peanut comb. 2r i , 6 7 oct 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37...

24
49. PEANUTS. SPANISH ORYLANO TEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION ESTIMATEO COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE FUEL,OIL. FIXEO ITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE LUB..REP. CCSTS OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE . MMM.M.C.).-.___.•«• a «_«-_«.<*« a*a.aa a.ai -D d GiCX) GHEZt <t„ OFFSET DISC 1.34 OCT 1.00 0.228 0.173 2.03 4.94 GRAIN ORILL 1 .46 OCT 1.00 C270 0.205 2.48 6.37 PEANUT DIG SHK2R 1.66 OCT 1.00 1.C84 0.821 9.77 13.83 PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 PICKUP TRUCK 10 OCT O.flO C.125 0.100 0.45 C.30 PICKUP TRUCK 10 OEC 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.45 0.30 PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.45 0.30 MOLDBOARD PLOW 1.32 MAR l.CO 0.571 0.432 5.72 12.28 TAMOEN DISC 1.58 MAR i.OO 0.208 0.158 1 .81 3.76 HERBICIDE SPRAYR 63 MAR l.CO C O 0.264 0.08 2.08 BEODER 6R 1.36 MAR 1.00 0.151 0.1 15 1.34 2.07 ROLLING CULT 6R 1 .38 MAR 1.00 0.216 0.164 1.91 3.71 PEANUT PLANTER 1 .68 APR 1 .CO 0.318 0.241 3.27 6.67 PICKUP TRUCK 10 APR 0.10 0.125 0.100 0.45 C.30 CULTIVATOR 6R 1 .40 MAY l.CO 0.151 0.115 1.32 2.47 PICKUP TRUCK 10 JULY 0.10 -£j_12§ -2a_G_ _____ .2x32 TOTALS 4.9C5 4.007 42.38 94.06 ^ \ ^**K ^V

Upload: others

Post on 29-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

49. P E A N U T S . S PA N I S H O R Y L A N OT E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O N

E S T I M AT E O C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E

F U E L , O I L . F I X E OI T E M T I M E S LABCR MACHINE L U B . . R E P . CCSTS

OPERATION N O . D AT E OVER HOURS HOURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E. ■ • ■ M M M . M . C . ). - . _ _ _ . • « • a«_«-_«.<*« a * a . a a a . a i-D d GiCX) GHEZt <t„

O F F S E T D I S C 1 . 3 4 OCT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 8 0 . 1 7 3 2 . 0 3 4 . 9 4G R A I N O R I L L 1 .46 OCT 1 . 0 0 C 2 7 0 0 . 2 0 5 2 . 4 8 6 . 3 7P E A N U T D I G S H K 2 R 1 . 6 6 OCT 1 . 0 0 1 . C 8 4 0 . 8 2 1 9 . 7 7 1 3 . 8 3PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1 . 0 0 1 . 0 8 4 0 - 8 2 1 1 0 . 3 9 3 4 . 3 7P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 OCT O . fl O C . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 OEC 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J A N 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0MOLDBOARD PLOW 1 . 3 2 MAR l . C O 0 . 5 7 1 0 . 4 3 2 5 . 7 2 1 2 . 2 8TA M O E N D I S C 1 . 5 8 MAR i . O O 0 . 2 0 8 0 . 1 5 8 1 .81 3 . 7 6H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 6 3 MAR l . C O C O 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 8BEODER 6R 1 . 3 6 MAR 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 1 . 3 4 2 . 0 7R O L L I N G C U LT 6 R 1 . 3 8 MAR 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 1 6 0 . 1 6 4 1 . 9 1 3 . 7 1PEANUT PLANTER 1 .68 APR 1 .CO 0 . 3 1 8 0 . 2 4 1 3 . 2 7 6 . 6 7P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 APR 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0C U LT I VAT O R 6 R 1 .40 MAY l . C O 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 1 . 3 2 2 . 4 7P I C K U P T R U C K 10 J U LY 0 . 1 0 - £ j _ 1 2 § -2a_G_ _ _ _ _ _ .2x32

TO TA L S 4 . 9 C 5 4 . 0 0 7 4 2 . 3 8 9 4 . 0 6

^ \

^ * * K

^ V

Page 2: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

_ B * Z I £ C

• n B / » 6 « B -1 3 b D .

s -8»cei s 3 tO.3 b D V

s_*_ i0 . * 2 f r6 3 * 1 2

3 b D V3MDV3 d D *

S S O ' & . I * 3 b D V

•Noixvinand _o_i asAObddv ony sdiauss noisn3ix31 - t f . U _ . D I d 9 V S V X 3 1 3 - l l _ i O S - > 3 8 * 3 « d r f V X S A 8 0 3 d O T 3 A 3 0 O N V 0 3 X D 3 ~ r t O D

3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 1 1 . _ _ d 3 H D N V d B O H b V _ b V I T O l l b V d 3 N 0A N V N O t M S N b n X S d O N V S I S O D 3 H 1 I D 1 0 3 t J d B O 3 Z I N 9 0 D 3 b 0 1 0 3 0 N 3 1 N 1 I O N

Sl 3NV 30109 1VU3N39 V SV A13105 03U.d3bd Sl 031N393bd NOIlVHbOdNI

- 6 B * 2 _ > S 3 d D V S N _ D 1 3 a 0 3 1 D 3 r 0 b d 1 3 N .

S 1 S D D 1 V 1 0 1 * 3 D l b d N 3 A 3 - ) . V 3 b 8

s i s o d a s i D a r o t i d i v i o j _

S I S O D 0 3 X l d T V 1 0 1< l N 3 b « _ H V H S 1 3 N > O N V T

N D U V D I b b l_ N 3 M d i n 0 3

b O l D V b l• b I S M I _ S 3 X V I * X S 3 b 3 X N I * * D 3 b d 3 0

S X S O D a s x i d * .

' $ 5 & - 0 1 S 3 b D Y S I S O D 3 1 B V l d _ A 3 A O B V 3 N 0 D N I _

•nfl/ZI _ . S1SDD 31BVlbVA _Dlbd N3A3-XV3bB

SXSOD 3T3VIHVA lYXOl

ISSAbVH •TYlOlHnSBS TnVH XSDD

BS AUVH -SOD91S0D 1S3ABVH

x s 3 A b V H 3 b d * i v x o i e n sIVX ldVD 9N l lVb3dO

B3HX0N01XV9IbbI

A b 3 N l H D Y H — — — - b O B V IN01XV9Ibbl

XN3M_1003bOX DVbX—••—Sb I Vd3b

N 0 I X V 9 I b b lXN3N_lln03

b o i D V b i — a s n i 3 i g n db31VM NOIltfDlbbl

H/0 N1H0V DS1N*l".dd. 30IDIXS3d3_nii«3_ NOlSriD

3Q1DIXD3SNI301DlUb3H31VHdS0Hd

033S NV38ADSSISOD ISSAbVHSbd

SXSOD 3~IBVIbVA *Z

V J r J l ^ L — . * S N b n x s b Q 3 X D 3 r o b d n v x o i

S 0 0 * 1 2m*_— 0 1 * 03bDV

•na 0 0 * _ £O S * _ I os*o •ne 0O*SC

- S 0 * B 9 1_r*r—

s9 1 * 0

3 b D .•nao 9 9 * 1 .

O B * 0 t 0 9 * C dnoH oo*e0 2 * » OS _ bODM 0 2 * 16 6 * 0 1 0 9 * . wnD-i ,♦ • 2. 0 * 8 3 b D VC V 2 3bDVf r _ * 2 3b DV0 8 * 2 2 3_DV9 0 * 1 3 b D V_ 1 * E 1 3 b D V

N I D V 0 0 * 2 10 0 * 0 1 0 0 * 0 1 3 b D V 0 0 * 10 0 * 5 0 9 * 2 3 b D V 0 0 * 25 * * I S _ . M 3 b D * 0 0 * 10 0 * 8 1 0 0 * 9 T d d V 0 0 * 2OS* 3 05. _ 3 b D V 0 0 * 1OB* 92 2 E * 0 •an 0 0 * E 90 5 * 0 1 9 2 * 0 * 9 T 0 0 * 2 *

ssn xndx

5 _ _ T f f 7 0 0 * 8 * f . B 0 0 * S E

3 X V N I X S 3 3 H 1 V A l l M n / S X H n 0 T 3 I Aa n o A ~ ~ o _ x 5 3 . * 5 S d o s x D a r o a d

N 0 i 9 3 b a a j m o * s o b v « 3 3 s . x a i03XV9IbbI *SN.33A0S

SNV3BAOSSldI3D3b SSDbO

Ab093XVD

( 9 1 D > l t r 2 l - a * l e / 9 0 / I 0 b 3 X d V 9 M i X V a d f > i n O H X i A 0 3 S D 3 B 0 1 X O NA H N O S B S O d U n d O M I N N V l d t t O d S N 0 I l D 3 r 0 b d •os

Page 3: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

51. SOYBEANS, IRRIGATEDTEXAS EOWARCS AQUIFER REGION

/-1*sSv

OPERATION

O F F S E T D I S CC H I S E L P L O WHARROW SPIKEL A N D P L A N EC U LT I VAT O R 4 RH E R B I C I D E S P R AY RR O L L I N G C U LT 6 RROD WEEDERP L A N T E R 6 RP I C K U P T R U C KC U LT I VAT O R 6 RC U LT I VAT O R 6 RPICKUP TRUCKP I C K U P T R U C KO F F S E T D I S CC H I S E L P L O WP I C K U P T R U C K

TO TA L S

T E M T I M E S LABCR M A C H I N E L U B . . R E P . C C S T SN O . D AT E O V E R H O U R S H C U R S P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

1 . 3 4 OEC 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 4 6 0 . 0 3 5 0 . 4 1 C . 9 91 . 3 3 OEC 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 0 . 1 5 3 1 . 8 8 2 . 8 5

7 3 OEC 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 9 5 0 . 0 1 0 . 8 01 . 5 0 OEC 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 4 4 2 7 . 1 91 . 3 9 J A N l . C O 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 5

6 3 F E B l . C O C O 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . C 81 . 3 8 F E B I - 0 0 0 . 2 1 6 0 . 1 6 4 1 . 9 1 3 . 7 11 ,65 MAY 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 7 0 0 . 1 2 9 1 . 4 4 2 . 1 41 ,42 MAY l . C O 0 . 2 2 4 0 . 1 7 0 2 . 2 9 5 . 6 0

1 0 MAY 0 . 1 0 C . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 01 . 4 0 JUNE 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 1 . 3 2 2 . 4 71 . 4 0 J U LY 1 . 5 0 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 9 3 . 7 0

1 0 J U LY 0 . 1 0 C . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 010 S E P T 0 . 1 0 C . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0

1 . 3 4 NOV l . C O 0 . 2 2 3 0 . 1 7 3 2 . 0 3 4 . 9 41 .33 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 0 . 1 5 3 1 . 8 8 2 . 8 5

10 NOV 0 . 1 0 .2*125 -2*122 - 2 * ± 5 - 2 * 3 22 . 4 4 2 2 . 2 3 1 1 9 . 4 6 6 3 . 9 9

^

Page 4: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

bZ.PROJECTIONS FOP PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY

NOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/81.

SUNFLOWERS, IRRIGATEOTEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION

e-1241 (C l6 )

CATEGORY

1. GROSS RECEIPTSSUNFLOWERS

TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS

2. VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST CCSTS

SUNFLOWER SEEDNITROGEN (DRY)HERB. SUNFL.INSECT. SUNFL.CUSTOM FERTILIZEPESTICIDE -APPLI •MISC AOMIN 0/HIRRIGATION WATERFUEL & LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

RE PA I RS——TR A CTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

L A B O R — - — M A C H I N E R YIRRIGATION

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL^ PREHARVEST

HARVEST COSTSHARV HAUL SUNFCUSTOM HAUL

SUBTOTAL. HARVEST

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. FIXED COSTSDEPREC. INTEREST. TAXES & INSUR.

TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LANO (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXEO COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTEO COSTS

6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS

PROJECTECY I E L D U N I T

1 6 0 0 . 0 0 L B .

e S S J f £ T £ f i Y O U RS / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E

0 . 1 5 2 * 2 * 2 2$ 2 4 0 . O C $

I N P U T U S E

4 . 0 0 L 8 . 7 . 5 0 3 0 . 0 05 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 6 1 3 . C O

1 . 0 03 . 0 0

ACREA P P L

8 . 2 54 . 0 0

8 . 2 51 2 . 0 0

1 . 0 03 . 0 0

ACREACRE

1 . 7 52 . 5 0

1 . 7 57 . 5 0

C . 5 0 ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 09 . 0 0 A C I N

ACRE 3 . 4 0ACREACRE

0 . 5 31 7 . 1 0

ACRE 0 . 8 2ACREACREhCUR 4 . 5 0

1 . 2 46 . C 34 . 5 21 . 0 0

0 . 9 0 HCUR 3 . 5 0 3 . 1 53 2 . 0 6 C C L .

ACRE0.15 ___

$±*&1

1 1 9 . 0 9 f

1 . 0 01 6 . 0 0

ACREC W T.ACRE

1 1 . 0 00 . 2 0

1 1.002*22

1 4 . 2 0 $ , ' .

ACRE s 1 3 3 . 2 9 f

ACRE s 1 0 6 . 7 1 $

ACREACRE

6 . 2 39 . 3 7

.

ACREACRE

$

1 4 . 8 9~22*S2

6 0 . 4 9ACRE $

ACRE $ 1 9 3 . 7 9 *

ACRE $ 4 6 . 2 1 S

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO ISNOT INTENOEO TO RECOGNIZE OR PREOICT TfcE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANYPHFi S^_I_.C__ARri£ftS.M_.SS-.R^NCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTEO ANO DEVELOPEO BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THEEXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FOF PUBLICATION. TEXAS AGRICULTURAL

Page 5: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

53 SUNFLOWERS. IRRIGATEDTEXAS ECWAROS AQUIFER REGION

F U E L . O I L . FIXEDITEM TIMES LABOR MACHINE L U B . , R E P. CCSTS

OPERATION NO. DATE OVER HOURS HOURS PER ACRE PER ACRE

PICKUP TRUCK 10 JAN O.IO 0 . 1 2 5 C.100 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0PICKUP TRUCK 10 APR 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0OFFSET DISC 3 . 3 4 MAY 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 8 0 . 1 7 3 1 . 4 3 4 . 2 9BEDDER 6R 3 . 3 6 MAY 1 . 0 0 0.151 0 . 11 5 0 . 9 4 1 .64PLANTER 6R 3 . 4 2 MAY 1 . 0 0 0 .224 0 . 1 7 0 1 . 7 0 4 . 9 6CULTIVATOR 6R 3 , 4 0 MAY 1 . 0 0 0.151 0 . 11 5 0 . 9 3 2 . 0 4HERBICIDE SPRAYR 6 3 MAY l .CO -J2_0— -2*2&± ______S -2*25

TOTALS 1 _GC4 1 . 0 3 6 5 . 9 9 15.61

^ \

/ ^ %

Page 6: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

54.

r

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/04/81.

WINTER WHEAT, IRRIGATEDTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATED COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

B - 1 2 4 K C 1 6 )

CATEGORY

GROSS RECEIPTSWINTER WHEATGRAZING

TOTAL PROJECTED

PROJECTEDY I E L D U N I T

3 5 . 0 09 0 . 0 0

RETURNS

INPUT USE

8 0 . 0 0120.002 0 . 0 0

0 . 5 012 .00

2. VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

WHEAT SD TREATEDNITROGEN (ANHY)PHOSPHATEMISC ADMIN 0/HIRRIGATION WATERFUEL & LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

R E P A I R S T R A C T O REQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

L A B O R M A C H I N E R YIRRIGATION

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL, PREHARVEST

HARVEST COSTSCUS HARV WHEAT IHAUL WHEAT

SUBTOTAL, HARVEST

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. FIXED COSTSDEPREC, INTEREST,TAXES & INSUR.

TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXED COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS

4 . 5 41 . 2 0

4 1 . 1 9

3 5 . 0 03 5 . 0 0

BU.DAYS

L B .LB.LB.ACREACINACREACREACREACREACREACREHOURHOURDOL.ACRE

BU.BU.ACRE

ACRE

ACRE

ACREACREACREACREACRE

ACRE

ACRE

fi B Q J E S I E C L . . . Y O U RS / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E

4 . 4 0 1 5 4 . 0 00 . 5 0 ± 5 x Q 2 J l 11

$ 1 9 9 . 0 0 S

0 . 1 8 1 4 . 4 00 . 1 5 1 8 . 0 00 . 3 2 6 . 4 0

1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 1 ~6 . 3 7

1 2 . 1 4 122. 80 11 11

1 . 5 4 1 14 . 7 2 1 1 —8 . 0 4

4 . 5 0 2 0 . 4 2 1 1 I3 . 5 0 4 . 2 0 H I0 . 1 5 f e ^ i S 1 ~ Z Z

S 1 3 1 . 5 5 S

0 . 2 0 7 . 0 00 . 1 3 ± A § § 1 ~ ~

S 1 1 . 5 5 $

$ 1 4 3 . 1 0 $

$ 5 5 . 9 0 S

11 . 6 73 3 . 8 61 9 . 8 5 ~30__l<_0_ Jl_lll—

$ 9 5 . 3 8 $

S 2 3 8 . 4 8 %

S - 3 9 . 4 8 S

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

Page 7: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

55.WINTER WHEAT. IRRIGATED

TEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGIONESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE

F U E L . O I L . F I X E DI T E M T I M E S LABOR MACHINE L U B . • R E P . COSTS

O P E R AT I O N N O . D AT E OVER HOURS HOURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

SHREDDER 3 . 3 0 S E P T 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 0 . 1 9 9 1 . 7 0 3 . 1 7P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 S E P T 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0CHISEL PLOW 3 . 3 3 OCT 1 . 0 0 0.2 02 0 . 1 5 3 1 . 3 5 2 . 2 8O F F S E T D I S C 3 . 3 4 OCT 1 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 1 . 7 2 5 . 1 5L A N D P L A N E 3 . 5 0 OCT 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 9 4BEDDER 6R 3 . 3 6 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 e l 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 0 . 9 4 1 . 6 4TRACTOR 3 NOV 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1DRY FERT SPRDER 3 . 6 0 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 2 9 3 . 4 4G R A I N D R I L L 3 , 4 6 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 0 . 2 0 5 1 . 7 7 5 . 6 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 NOV 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J A N 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0TRACTOR 3 F E B 1 . 0 0 1.2 50 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 MAR 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 MAY 0 . 1 0 .- ________ -2*122 __l__S -2x32

TO TA L S 4 . 5 3 8 3 . 5 7 0 2 4 . 7 7 4 3 . 5 5

^ \

Page 8: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

56. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT JPDATING AFTER 02/04/81.

WINTER WHEAT, DRYLANDTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE

B-124MC16)

CATEGORY

GROSS RECEIPTSWINTER WHEATGRAZING

TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS

VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

WHEAT SD TREATEDNITROGEN (ANHY)PHOSPHATEMISC ADMIN 0/HFUEL & LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTR E P A I R S T R A C T O R

EQUIPMENTL A B O R M A C H I N E R YOPERATING CAPITAL

SUBTOTAL. PREHARVESTHARVEST COSTS

CUST HARV WHEATHAUL WHEAT

SUBTOTAL, HARVEST

TOTAL VA.IA8LE COSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. FIXED COSTSDEPREC. INTEREST, TAXES & INSJR

TRACTOREQUIPMENT

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXED COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS

PROJECTEDY I E L D U N I T

__S________IS-__._.-S / U N I T VA L U E

YOURESTIMATE

2 0 . 0 0 BU.4 5 . 0 0 DAYS

IN»UT USE

8 3 . 0 0 LB.8 0 . 0 0 LB.2 0 . 0 0 LB.

0 . 3 0 ACREACREACREACREACRE

4 . 5 4 HOUR2 7 . 2 0 DOL.

ACRE

1 .00 ACRE2 0 . 0 0 BU.

ACRE

ACRE

S ACRE

ACREACREACREACRE

ACRE

ACRE

4 . 4 0 8 8 . 0 00 . 5 0 2 2 _ _ § a

$ 1 1 0 . 5 0 $

0 . 1 8 1 4 . 4 00 . 1 5 1 2 . 0 00 . 3 2 6 . 4 0

1 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 06 . 3 7

1 2 . 1 41. 544 . 7 2

4 . 5 0 2 0 . 4 20 . 1 5 ± x 2 3

$ 8 6 . 4 1 $

1 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 00 . 1 3 a _ _ _

S 1 7 . 6 0 $

$ 1 0 4 . 0 1 $

$ 6 . 4 9 $

11 . 6 73 3 . 8 6__._&_

S 7 5 . 5 3 S

S 1 7 9 . 5 4 $

$ - 6 9 . 0 4 S

I N F O R M AT I O N P R E S E N T E D I S P R E PA R E D S O L E LY A S A G E N E R A L G U I D E A N D I SN O T I N T E N D E D TO R E C O G N I Z E O R P R E D I C T T H E C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S F R O M A N YO N E PA R T I C U L A R FA R M O R R A N C H O P E R AT I O N . T H E S E P R O J E C T I O N S W E R EC O L L E C T E O A N D D E V E L O P E D B Y S TA F F . E M B E R S O F T H E T E X A S A G R I C U LT U R A LE X T E N S I O N S E R V I C E A N D A P P R O V E D « = 0 R P U B L I C AT I O N .

Page 9: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

57.WINTER WHEAT. DRYLAND

TEXAS EDWARDS AQJIFER REGIONESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE

F U E L . O I L . F I X E DI T E M T I M E S LABOR MACHINE L U B . . R E P . COSTS

O P E R AT I O N N O . O AT E DVER HOURS HOJRS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

SHREDDER 3 . 3 0 S E P T 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 0 . 1 9 9 1 . 7 0 3 . 1 7P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 SEPT 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0CHISEL PLOW 3 . 3 3 OCT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 0 . 1 5 3 1 . 3 5 2 . 2 8O F F S E T D I S C 3 , 3 4 OCT 1 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 1 . 7 2 5 . 1 5L A N D P L A N E 3 . 5 0 OCT 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 9 4BEDDER 6R 3 . 3 6 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 0 . 9 4 1 . 6 4TRACTOR 3 NOV 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1DRY FERT SPRDER 3 . 6 0 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 3 0 o l 5 4 1 . 2 9 3 . 4 4P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 NOV 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 O o l O O 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0G R A I N D R I L L 3 . 4 6 OEC 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 0 . 2 0 5 1 . 7 7 5 . 6 0P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 J A N 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 „ 4 5 0 . 3 0TRACTOR 3 F E B 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 MAR 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 MAY 0 . 1 0 ..2x125. -2x122 - 2 x * 5 -_u2_2

T O T A L S 4 . 5 3 8 3 . 5 7 0 2 4 . 7 7 4 3 . 5 5

/ a s \

^ * V

"̂"X

Page 10: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

58. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 02/04/81.

SPRING WHEAT, IRRIGATEDTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATED COSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE

B-124KC16)

CATEGORY

GROSS RECEIPTSSPRING WHEAT

TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS

VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

WHEAT SD TREATEDNITROGEN (ANHY)PHOSPHATEMISC ADMIN 0/HIRRIGATION WATERFUEL & LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

R E P A I R S T R A C T O REQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

L A B O R M A C H I N E R YIRRIGATION

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST

HARVEST COSTSCUS HARV WHEAT IHAUL WHEAT

SUBTOTAL, HARVEST

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. FIXED COSTSDEPREC. INTEREST. TAXES & INSUR.

TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXED COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS

PROJECTEDY I E L D U N I T

£8Q______I___>___ YOURS / U N I T VA L U E E S T I M AT E

3 5 . 0 0 BU. 4 . 0 0 _S

_ _ _ . _ _ . fl fl1 4 0 . 0 0 S

INPUT USE

8 0 . 0 0 L B .L B .

0 . 1 80 . 1 5

1 4 . 4 01 2 . 0 08 0 . 0 0

2 0 . 0 0 L B .ACREACIN

0 . 3 21 0 . 0 0

6 . 4 05 . 0 00 . 5 0

1 0 . 0 0ACREACRE

6 . 3 71 2 . 1 4

ACRE 1 9 . 0 0ACREACREACRE

1 . 5 44 . 7 26 . 7 0

4 . 5 4 HOURHOURDOL.ACRE

4 . 5 03 . 5 00 . 1 5 _ .

S

2 0 . 4 23 . 5 0____.&

11 8 . 9 1

1 . 0 03 5 . 8 8

s3 5 . 0 0 BU.

BU.ACRE

0 . 2 00.13 __..

$

7 . 0 0__-_5S

1 1 . 5 53 5 . 0 0

sACRE S 1 3 0 . 4 6 s

S ACRE $ 9 . 5 4 s

ACRE 1 1.67 .ACRE 3 3 . 8 6ACRE 1 6 . 5 4ACRE __ __30_00ACRE S 9 2 . 0 7 $

ACRE s 2 2 2 . 5 4 $

ACRE s - 8 2 . 5 4 S

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

Page 11: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

59.S P R I N G W H E AT. I R R I G AT E D

T E X A S E D WA R D S A Q J I F E R R E G I O NE S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E

F U E L . O I L . F I X E DI T E M T I M E S LABOR M A C H I N E L U B . , R E P . COSTS

O P E R AT I O N N O . D AT E OVER HOURS HOURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

SHREDDER 3 . 3 0 SEPT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 0 . 1 9 9 1 . 7 0 3 . 1 7P I C K U P T R U C < 1 0 S E P T 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0CHISEL PLOW 3 , 3 3 OCT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 0 . 1 5 3 1 . 3 5 2 . 2 8O F F S E T D I S C 3 , 3 4 OCT 1 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 1 - 7 2 5 . * 5L A N D P L A N E 3 . 5 0 OCT 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 9 4BEDDER 6R 3 . 3 6 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 0 . 9 4 1 . 6 4TRACTOR 3 NOV 1 .00 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1DRY FERT SPRDER 3 . 6 0 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 2 9 3 . 4 4P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 NOV 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0G R A I N D R I L L 3 . 4 6 OEC 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 7 0 0 . 2 0 5 1 . 7 7 5 . 6 0P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 J A N 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0TRACTOR 3 F E B 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 MAR 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 MAY 0 . 1 0 ..2*125 -2*122 - 2 * ± 5 -___.2S

TO TA L S 4 . 5 3 8 3 . 5 7 0 2 4 . 7 7 4 3 . 5 5

^ \

Page 12: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

60. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT JPDATING AFTER 02/04/81.

SP=MMG WHEAT. DRYLANDTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATED CDSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE

B - 1 2 4 K C 1 6 )

CATEGORY

GROSS RECEIPTSSPRING WHEAT

TOTAL PROJECTED

PR3JECTEDY I E L D U N I T

2 0 . 0 0 B U .RETURNS

IN3UT USEVARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

W H E A T S D T R E A T E D 6 0 . 0 0N I T R O G E N ( A N H Y ) 4 0 . 0 0P H O S P H A T E 1 0 . 0 0M I S C A D M I N 0 / H 0 . 3 0FUEL & LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTR E P A I R S T R A C T O R

EQUIPMENTL A B O R M A C H I N E R Y 4 . 4 4O P E R A T I N G C A P I T A L 2 1 . 5 0

SUBTOTAL. PREHARVESTHARVEST COSTS

CUST HARV WHEATHAUL WHEAT

SUBTOTAL. HARVEST

LB.LB.LB.ACREACREACREACREACREHOURDOL.ACRE

1 . 0 0 A C R E2 0 . 0 0 B U .

ACRE

T O T A L V A R I A B L E C O S T S A C R E

3 . I N C O M E A 3 0 V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S A C R E

4. FIXED COSTSDEPREC..INTEREST,TAXES & INSJR.

T R A C T O R A C R EE Q U I P M E N T A C R E

L A N D ( N E T S H A R E - R E N T ) A C R ET O T A L F I X E D C O S T S A C R E

5 . T O T A L P R O J E C T E D C O S T S A C R E

6 . N E T P R O J E C T E D R E T U R N S A C R E

_._.__eBQ_.E_;iE__._-. YOURS / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

4 . 0 0 3 2 * 2 2$ 8 0 . 0 0 $

0 . 1 8 1 0 . 8 00 . 1 5 6 . 0 00 . 3 2 3 . 2 0

1 0 . 0 0 3 . 0 05 . 9 4

1 2 . 1 41 . 4 34 . 6 7

4 . 5 0 1 9 . 9 90 . 1 5 3 * 2 3

S 7 1 . 7 3 S

1 5 . 0 0 1 5 . 0 00 . 1 3 2 * £ f l

$ 1 7 . 6 0 S

$ 8 9 . 3 3 S

S - 9 . 3 3 $

1 0 . 8 83 2 . 8 632*22

S 7 3 . 7 3 S

$ 1 6 3 . 0 7 S

S - 8 3 . 0 7 S

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE AND ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FR3M ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED AMD DEVELOPED BY STAF* MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

Page 13: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

6.1.S P R I N G W H E AT, D R Y L A N D

T E X A S E D WA R D S A Q U I F E R R E G I O NE S T I M AT E D C O S T S A N D R E T U R N S P E R A C R E

F U E L . O I L . F I X E DI T E M T I M E S LABOR M A C H I N E L U B . , R E P . COSTS

O P E R AT I O N N O . D AT E 3VER HOURS HOURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

SHREDDER 3 . 3 0 S E P T 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 0 . 1 9 9 1 . 7 0 3 . 1 7P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 S E P T 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0CHISEL PLOW 3 , 3 3 OCT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 0 2 0 . 1 5 3 1 . 3 5 2 . 2 8O F F S E T D I S C 3 , 3 4 OCT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 8 0 . 1 7 3 1 .43 4 . 2 9BEODER 6R 3 , 3 6 NOV 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 0 . 9 4 1 , 6 4TRACTOR 3 NOV 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1DRY FERT SPRDER 3 , 6 0 NQV 1 . 0 0 0 « 2 0 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 2 9 3 . 4 4P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 NOV 0.1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 , 3 0G R A I N O R I L L 3 , 4 6 DEC 1 .00 0 . 2 7 0 0 . 2 0 5 I * ? 7 7 5 . 6 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J A N O o l O 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0TRACTOR 3 FEB 1 . 0 0 1 . 2 5 0 1 . 0 0 0 6 . 7 2 9 . 9 1P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 MAR 3 . 1 0 Ool 25 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 MAY 0.1 0 __»_.ia_i - 2 * 1 2 2 -2**5 _ft-___0

TO TA L S 4 . 4 4 2 3 . 4 9 8 2 4 * 1 8 4 1 . 7 5

^*5R\

Page 14: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

64. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USSD WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/06/81.

PRCCESSEO BEETS IRRIGATEDTEXAS EC-ARCS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO COSTS ANC RETURNS PER ACRE

e - 1 2 4 H C 1 6 )

PROJECTEOV I E L O U . I T

1 3 . 0 0 T O N

CATEGORY

GROSS RECEIPTSBEETS. PROCESS

TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS

VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

BEET SEEDNITROGEN CCRYlMTROGEN (LIQ)PHOSPHATEHERBICIDEBORONBORON APPLICAT.FUNGICIDEFUNGICIDE APPLI.MISC AOMIN 0/HIRRIGATION HATERFUEL . LUBE—TRACTOR

EOUIPMENTIRRIGATION

REPAIRS-——TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

L A B O R — — — M A C H I N E RYIRRIGATIONOTHER

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST

HARVEST COSTSCUSTOM HARV&HAUL

SUBTOTAL. HARVEST

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. FIXED COSTSDEPREC.INTEREST.TAXES & INSUR.

TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LANO <NET SHARE-RENT}TOTAL FIXED COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS

_ « _ _ _ ; _ _ _ _ _ Y O U RS / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

40.00 52___2$ ~ 3 2 0 . 0 0 _

INPUT USE

le .oo L B . 2 . 4 0 4 3 . 2 02 4 . 0 0 LB. 0 . 2 6 6 . 2 42 4 . 0 06 0 . 0 0

LB.LB.ACREACREACRE

0 . 2 30 . 3 ?

2 0 . 0 02 . 0 02.SO

s . 5 219 .202 0 . 0 0

2 . 0 02 . 5 0

1.001 . 0 01 . 0 03 . 0 03 . 0 0C . 5 0

ACREACREACRE

4 . 5 02 . 5 0

1 0 . 0 0

13.SO7.SOS . 0 0

12 .00 ACINACREACREACRE

1 7 . . 81 . 0 6

2 2 . e oACRE 3 . 9 8ACREACREHCURHOURHOUR

4.SO3 . 5 03 . 5 0

3 . 4 88 . 0 4

1 4 . e i4 . 2 0

2 1 . 0 0

3. 251.20e.oo

5 5 . 3 8 OCL.ACRE

0 . 1 5 _S

-.__!2 3 0 . 1 2 S

13.00 TCNACRE

a.ao _s _---__■_

11 4 . 4 0 s ~ACRE s 3 4 4 . 5 2 s

s ACRE s 175 .48 a

ACRE 2 8 . e oACRE 48. eiACREACREACRE

19.65____2

« 1 2 7 . 4 5 _ACRE S 4 7 1 . 9 7 1

ACRE S 4 8 . 0 3 •YIELD BASED ON MEIGHTEO AVERAGE OF 12X*i; 42X12; I9X USABLECULLS AND 27X NCNUSABLE CULLS

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO ISNOT INTENOED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FRCM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS MERECOLLECTED AND OEVELOPEO BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVEO FCR PUBLICATION.

Page 15: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

65.PRCCESSEO BEETS IRRIGATED

TEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGIONESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

F U E L , O I L , F I X E DI T E M T I M E S LABCR MACHINE L U B . , R E P . COSTS

O P E R AT I O N N O . O AT E OVER HOURS HCURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

SHREDDER 2 . 3 0 SEPT 1 . 0 0 C . 2 . 3 0 . 1 9 9 2 . 0 8 3 . 0 6O F F S E T D I S C 2 . 3 4 SEPT 1 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 2.1 1 5 . 0 4MOLDBOARD PLOW 1 . 3 2 SEPT 1 . 0 0 0 . 5 7 1 0 . 4 3 2 5 . 7 2 1 2 . 2 8L A N D P L A N E 1 . 5 0 SEPT 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 4 4 2 7 . 1 93 E D 0 E R 6 R 1 ,36 OEC 1 . 0 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 1 . 3 4 2 . 0 7P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 OEC 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 6 3 J A N 1 .00 0 . 0 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 8DRY FERT SPRDER 1 ,60 J A N l . C O 0 . 2 0 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 8 3 4 . 0 2P L A N T E R 4 R 1 .41 J A N 1 . 0 0 0 . 3 0 3 0 . 2 3 0 2 . 9 8 6 . 7 3BED SHAPER 6R 1 . 4 8 J A N 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 5 2 0 . 1 9 1 2. 18 3 . 5 7P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J A N 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 1 . 3 9 F E B I . 0 0 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 5C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 1 .39 MAR 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 5P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 MAR 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 1 ,39 APR 1 . 0 0 C . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 9P I C K U P T R U C K 10 MAY 0. 10 .Q.xl25 -2*122 - 2 * ± 5 -L\x32

TO TA L S 3 . 2 4 8 2 . 7 4 6 2 6 . 4 9 7 7 . 6 1

/tffsB%l.

/^N

^ % .

Page 16: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

66. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/06/81. 8 - 1 2 4 H C 1 6 .

CA6BAGE. IRRIGATEDTEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

CATEGORY PROJECTEDY I E L D U N I T

1. GROSS RECEIPTSCABBAGE

TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS

2. VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

CABBAGE SEEDNITROGEN (LIQ)PHOSPHATEHERBICO. CABBAGENITROGEN (ORY)INSECTICIOEFUNGICIDEPESTICIDE APPLI .I .SC ADMIN 0/HIRRIGATION HATERFUEL 6 LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

RE PA I RS—- —-TR ACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LABOR*- -——MACHINERYIRRIGATIONOTHER

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST

HARVEST C0ST6HVST.PKG.MKT CBG

SUBTOTAL. HARVEST

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

S 5 0 . 0 0 B A G S

S B fl i - E S T E fl Y O U RS / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

4.SO __2_.2fl.tJB_S 2 4 7 5 . 0 0 S

NPUT USE

l . S O L B . 4 2 . 0 0 6 3 . 0 05 0 . 0 0 L B .

L E .0 . 2 30 . 3 2

1 1 . 5 02 5 . 6 0eo.oo

1 . 0 0 ACRE 8 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 __-» -_ — _■__ _T5 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 6 1 3 . 0 01 5 . 0 0 A P P L 6 . S O 9 7 . 5 0 ■ ■■l___IIU-

3 . 0 0 APPL 6 . S O 1 9 . 5 01 9 . 0 0 ACRE 2 . S O 3 7 . 5 0

O . S O ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0 «-_-_____-.-_.-___.1 2 . 0 0 A C I N

ACRE 1 4 . 9 6ACREACRE

1 . 3 22 2 . 8 0

ACRE 3 . 3 9ACREACRE

3 . 2 1C C 4

2 . 9 9 HOURHOUR

4 . 5 03 . 5 0

1 3 . 4 54 . 2 01 . 2 0

2 4 . 0 0 HCURO C L .

3 . 5 00 . 1 5 .

8 4 . 0 0Sj-22. . . 2 6

ACRE S 4 4 5 . 7 6 S

5 5 0 . 0 0 BAGS 2 . 2 0 ._A_1____ACRE « 1 2 1 0 . 0 0 ». .ACRE S 1 6 5 5 . 7 6 S

J ^ N

B R E A K - E V E N P R I C E . VA R I A B L E C C S T S

3 . I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C C S T S

4 . F I X E O C C S T SDEPREC..INTEREST.TAXES C INSUR.

TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXED COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTEO COSTS

3.01/EAGS

ACRE

ACREACREACREACREACRE

ACRE

8 19.24 S_

2 3 . 3 24 6 . 5 9 .1 9 . e s .

.S 1 2 9 . 7 5 S .

S 17eS.S2 «

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS

6. NET PROJECTED RETURNS

S 3 . 2 S / B A G S

A C R E S 6 _ _ . 4 8 S

CABBAGE ARE PACKEO AND MARKETED IN SO PCUNO BAGS.BUOGET RASED ON A FALL CROP

INFORMATION PRESENTEO IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUICE ANO ISNOT INTENOEO TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH CPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS HERECOLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF .EMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FCR PUBLICATION.

Page 17: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

67.CAEBAGE, IRRIGATED

TEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGIONESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

F U E L . O I L . F I X E DI T E M T I M E S LABCR MACHINE L U B . , P E P . COSTS

O P E R AT I O N N O .

1 0

D AT E

DEC

OVER

0 . 1 0

HCURS

C . 1 2 5

HCURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

P I C K U P T R U C K 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0P ICKUP TRUCK 10 J A N 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0P I C K U P T R U C K 10 APR 0 . 1 0 C . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0SHREDDER 2 . 3 0 JUNE 0 . 5 0 0 . 1 3 1 O . I O O 1 . 0 4 1 . 5 3O F F S E T D I S C 2 . 3 4 JUNE 1 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 2. 1 1 5 . 0 4MOLDEOARD PLOW 1 .32 J U N E 1 .00 C . 5 7 1 0 . 4 3 2 5 . 7 2 1 2 . 2 6LANO PLANE 1 .50 JUNE 0 . 2 0 0 . 0 5 0 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 4 4 2 7 . 1 9ORY FERT SPRDER 2 , 6 0 JUNE 1 .00 0 . 2 0 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 5 8 3 . 3 6BEODER 6R 1 . 3 6 J U LY 1 . 0 0 C . l S l 0 . 11 5 1.3 4 2 . 0 7C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 1 , 3 9 J U LY 1 .CO 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 5H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 6 3 J U LY 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 8S TA N H AY P L A N T E R 2 , 4 4 J U LY 1 .CO 0 . 3 0 3 0 . 2 3 0 2 . 3 9 4 . 4 9OICKUP TRUCK 1 0 J U LY 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 1 ,39 SEPT 1 .CO 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 5C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 1 ,39 OCT 1 .00 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 9 8 3 . 4 5P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 CCT 0 . 1 0 _A_A__ -0*122 -2x±5 .2x32

s^%.

TOTALS 2 . 9 8 9 2 . 5 5 5 2 2 . 8 8 6 9 . 9 0> * V

Page 18: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

68.

| f P * \

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPDATING AFTER 01/06/81.

CANTALOUPES. IRRIGATEOTEXAS EDWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

e-1241 (C16 )

CATEGORY

1. GROSS RECEIPTSCANTALOUPS

TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS

2. VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

CANTALOUP SEFONITROGEN (LIO)PHOSPHATEHERBICO. CNTLPS.INSCTCD CNTLOUPS

FNGICO CANTALOUPPESTICIDE APPLI .BEEHIVE RENTNITROGEN (ORY)M I S C A D M I N 0 / HIRRIGATION WATERF U E L - L U e E — T R A C T O R

EQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

REPA I RS———TRACTOREOUIPMENTIRRIGATION

L A B O R — — - — M A C H I N E R YI R R I G AT I O NOTHER

O P E R AT I N G C A P I TA LS U B TO TA L . P R E H A RV E S T

HARVEST COSTSH R V. P K G . M K T C N T P

S U B TO TA L . H A RV E S T

T O TA L VA R I A B L E C O S T S

PROJECTEOY I E L D U N I T

3 0 C . 0 0 C S T N

£ E f l _ E _ : L _ _ _ _ v o u rS / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

5.50 .JLfiSfliSJiS 1650.00 S

JfPN

INPUT USE

2 . 0 04 0 . 0 080 .00

L B .LB.L B .

S.SO0 . 2 30 . 3 2

11 . 0 09 . 2 0

2 6 . 6 0—— .-

1 . 0 0 ACRE 1 3 . 3 0 1 3 . 5 05 . 0 06 . 0 0

APPLAPPLACRE

5 . 0 03 . 0 02 . 5 0

2 5 . 0 018 .0015 .00e.oo

O.SO ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 04C.00 LB. 0 . 2 6 10 .40

C.50 ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 01 2 . 0 0 ACIN

ACREACREACREACREACREACREHCUR 4 . 5 0

15 .801 . 5 9

2 2 . 8 03 . 6 94 . 2 3e . 0 4

1 7 . 5 33 . 8 91 . 2 0 HCUR 3 . 5 0 4 . 2 0

2 0 . 0 0 HCURDCL.ACRE

3 . 5 00.15 .

S

7 0 . 0 0£__§_.

2 9 4 . 0 85 6 . 6 8

9

30C.0O CRTNACRE

4 . 0 0 1 2 0 0 . Q QS 1200.00 1

ACRE S 1494.08 J

BREAKEVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS S 4 . 9 8 / C R T N

3 . I N C O M E A B O V E VA R I A B L E C O S T S

4 . F I X E O C O S T SDEPREC. INTEREST.TAXeS _ INSUR.

TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXEO COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS

6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS

A C R E S 1 5 5 . 9 2 S _ _ .

A C R E 2 8 . 0 4A C R E 1 8 6 . 3 0 2 Z ' .A C R E I 9 . e 5A C R E X m a S J IA C R E S 2 7 4 . 1 9 J

A C R E S 1 7 6 8 . 2 7 J

* 5 . 8 9 / C R T N

A C R E S - l i e . 2 7 S

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPAREO SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANC ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FRO. ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED ANO DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FCP PU-LICATION.

j P ^ N

Page 19: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

69.C A N TA L O U P E S , I R R I G AT E D

T E X A S E C WA R C S A Q U I F E R R E G I O NE S T I M AT E D C C S T S A N O R E T U R N S P E R A C R E

toaoa <pc

O P E R AT I O NI T E M

N O . D AT ET I M E SOVER

LABORHOURS

MACHINEHCURS

i cn_o-in a o o c _a aaa qdp t

F U E L . O I L , F I X E DL U B . . R E P . C C S T SP E P A C R E P E R A C R E

) Q3 0GBGOCB tm Gf Q4I QQ Vfl tSm) mMM mmmmW

^ ^ %

P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 O C TC U L T I V A T O R 4 R 3 . 3 9 N O VS H R E D D E R 3 . 3 0 D E CC U L T I V A T O R 4 R 3 , 3 9 D E CP I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 D E CO F F S E T D I S C 3 . 3 4 J A NM O L D B O A R D P L O W 1 , 3 2 J A NL A N O P L A N E 5 0 J ^ NC U L T I V A T O R 4 R 3 . 3 9 J A NP I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J A NO F F S E T D I S C 3 , 3 4 F E B9 E D D E R 6 R 1 . 3 6 F E BH E R B I C I D E S P R A Y R 6 3 F E BD R Y F E R T S P R D E R 3 . 6 0 F E BC U L T I V A T O R 4 R 3 , 3 9 M A RP L A N T E R 6 R 3 , 4 2 M A RP I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 M A RP O L L I N G C U L T 4 R 3 , 3 7 A P RL A N D P L A N E 5 0 M A YP I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 M A YP I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 J U L Y

0 . 1 01 . 0 0l . C O1 . 0 00 . 1 01 . 2 01 . 0 00 . 2 01 . 0 00 . 1 01 . 0 01 . 0 01 .001 .00l . C O1 . 0 00 . 1 01 . 0 01 .000 . 1 0

G.1250 .2270 . 2 * 30 .2270 . 1 2 50 . 2 7 30 . 5 7 10 . 00 . 2 2 7C.1250 . 2 2 8C o l - 10 . 00 . 2 0 30 . 2 2 7C . 2 2 40 . 1 2 50 .3240 . 00 . 1 2 5

0 . 1 0 00 . 1 7 20 . 1 9 90 . 1 7 20 . 1 0 00 . 2 C 70 . 4 3 20 . 0 3 80 . 1 7 2O o l O O0 . 1 7 30 . 1 1 50.26 40 . 1 5 40 . 1 7 20 . 1 7 00 . 1 0 00 . 2 4 60 . 1 9 10 . 1 0 0

o.io -2x125 -2x122

0 . 4 51 . 3 81 . 7 01 . 3 80 . 4 51 . 7 25 . 7 20 . 0 21 . 3 80 . 4 51 . 4 31 . 3 40 . 0 81 . 2 91 . 3 81 .700 . 4 51 . 9 60. 1 10 . 4 5

-2*±5

0 . 3 02 . 8 13 . 1 72 . 8 1C . 3 05 . 1 5

1 2 . 2 82 6 . 6 3

2 . 8 1C . 3 04 . 2 92 . 0 72 . 0 83 . 4 42 , 8 14 . 9 6Co 304 . C 8

->*«$*C . 3 0

-2*32^ \

TOTALS 3 . 8 9 5 3 . 4 7 6 25 .31 2 1 4 . 3 4

^•^sv

Page 20: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

70. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/81.

CARROTS. IRRIGATEOTEXAS ECWAROS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO CCSTS AND RETURNS PER ACRE

e - 1 2 4 t ( C 1 6 )

CATEGORY

1. GROSS RECEIPTSCARROTS

TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS

?. VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST COSTS

CARROT SEEONITROGEN (LIQ)PHOSPHATEHERBICIDEINSECTICIOEFUNGICIOEPESTICIDE APPLI .NITROGEN (DRY)MISC AOMIN 0/HIRRIGATION WATER

FUEL C LUBE—TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

REPA I RS—— -TRACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LABOR-———MACHINERYIRRIGATION

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST

HARVEST COSTSHRV.PKG.MKT CRRT

SUBTOTAL. HARVEST

P R O J E C T E D E B P - E C I E - Y O U RY I E L O U N I T S / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

300 .00 CELO 6 . 0 0 _ l M fl j . fl 2S 1800.00 J

NPUT USE

2 . 0 0 L B . 6 . 5 0 1 3 . 0 06 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 3 1 3 . e o7 5 . 0 0 L e . 0 . 3 2 2 4 . 0 0

3 . 0 0 ACREAPPL

8 . 0 04 . 0 0

2 4 . 0 03 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 04 . 0 0 APPL 3 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 04 . 0 0 ACRE 2 . 5 0 1 0 . 0 0

6 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 6 1 5 . 6 00 . 5 0 ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0

1 2 . 0 0 ACINACRE 1 2 . 8 3ACRE 1 . 5 9ACRE 2 2 . 8 0 .ACRE 2 . 9 7ACRE 3 . 6 0ACRE e . 0 4

3.21 HOUR 4 . 5 0 T 4 . 4 51 . 2 0 HCUR 3 . 5 0 4 . 2 0

69.OS OOL. 0 . 1 5 .ACRE S 2 1 0 . 2 4 S

3 0 0 . 0 0 CELO 4 . 2 5 ___!__»__ .ACRE S 1275 .00 J .

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. FIXEO COSTSDEPREC..INTEREST,TAXES 6 INSUR.

TRACTOREOUIPMENTIRRIGATION

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FIXEO COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

BREAK-EVEN PRICE, TOTAL CCSTS

A C R E S 1 4 6 5 . 2 4 S .

* 4 . 9 S / C E L 0

ACRE 314.76 S_

ACRE 2 2 . 5 3ACRE 5 2 . 9 - _ . ,ACREACREACRE

1 9 . 8 5-Qt°S _

S 1 3 5 . 3 4 S

ACRE S l 6 2 0 . S e s

S .40 /CEL0

6 . N E T P R O J E C T E O R E T U R N S A C R E S 1 7 9 . 4 2 S

CARROTS ARE PACKEO ANO MARKETEO IK 48 CNE PCUNO CELLO BAGSINFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIOE ANC ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS ANO RETURNS FRCM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED ANO OEVELOPEO BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE ANO APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

Page 21: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

71.

CARROTS, IRRIGATEOTEXAS ECWARCS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

OPERATION

OFFSET DISCMOLDBOARD PLOWLANO PLANEOFFSET DISCBEDOER 6RDRY FERT SPRDERPICKUP TRUCKCULTIVATOR 4RHERBICIDE SPRAYRSTANHAY PLANTERPICKUP TRUCKCULTIVATOR 4RHERBICIDE SPRAYRPICKUP TRUCKCULTIVATOR 4RHERBICIDE SPRAYRPICKUP TRUCKPTCKUP TRUCKPICKUP TRUCK

TOTALS

FUEL .O IL , FIXEOITEM TIMES LABCR MACHINE L U B . , R E P. COSTSNO. OATE OVER HCURS HOURS PER ACRE PEP ACRE

3 . 3 4 JUNE 1 . 2 0 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 2 0 7 1 . 7 2 5 . 1 51 . 3 2 JUNE 1 . 0 0 0.571 0 . 4 3 2 5 . 7 2 12 .281 . 5 0 JUNE 0 . 2 0 O.CSO 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 4 4 2 7 . 1 93 . 3 4 JULY 1 . 0 0 C.228 0 . 1 7 3 1 . 4 3 4 . 2 91 . 3 6 JULY 1.00 0.151 0 . 11 5 1 . 3 4 2 . 0 73 . 6 0 JULY l . C O 0 . 2 0 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 2 9 3 . 4 4

10 JULY 0 . 1 0 C.125 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C.303 . 3 9 AUG 1 .00 0 .227 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 3 8 2 . 8 1

63 AUG 1 .CO 0.0 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 83 . 4 4 AUG 1 . 0 0 0 .303 0 . 2 3 0 1 . 9 5 4 . 6 1

10 AUG 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C.303 , 3 9 SEPT 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 3 8 2 . 8 1

63 SEPT 1.00 0 . 0 0 . 2 6 4 o.oe 2 . 0 810 SEPT 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 9 0 . 3 0

3 , 3 9 OCT 1 . 0 0 C.227 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 3 8 2 . 8 163 OCT 1 .00 0 . 0 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 810 OCT 0 . 1 0 C.125 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C.3010 NOV 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C.3010 DEC 0 . 1 0 .2x125 .2x122 _ _ • _ _ .2x32

3 . 2 11 3 . 2 5 7 2 0 . 9 9 7 5.49

^-%v

^■ * \

Page 22: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

72. PROJECTIONS FOR PLANN INC PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USEO WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/81.

CUCUMBERS. IRRIGATEDTEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

B-1241 IC16)

PROJECTEDY I E L O U N I T

3 3 0 . 0 0 C RT N

CATEGORY

1. GROSS RECEIPTSCUCUMBERS

TOTAL PROJECTEO RETURNS

2. VARIABLE COSTSPREHARVEST CCSTS

CUCUMBER SEEONITROGEN (LIQ)PHOSPHATEHRBICO. CUCUMBERINSECTICIDEPESTICIOE APPLI.BEEHIVE RENTNITROGEN (ORY)MISC ADMIN 0/HIRRIGATION WATERFUEL - LUBE—TRACTOR

EQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

REPA I RS— —-TR ACTOREQUIPMENTIRRIGATION

L A B O R — — - M A C H I N E R YIRRIGATION

OPERATING CAPITALSUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST

HARVEST COSTSHRV.PKG.MKT

SUBTOTAL. HARVEST

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

S B f l J £ £ T £ B v o u RS / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

5 . 5 0 . i fl l fl a fl flS 1815.00 <

INPUT USE

2 . 5 0 L B . 4 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 04 0 . 0 0 Le. 0 . 2 3 9 . 2 0eo.oo L B . 0 . 3 2 2 S . 6 0

1 . 0 0 ACRE 2 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 03 . 0 0 APPL 7 . 5 0 2 2 . 5 03 . 0 0 ACRE 2 . 5 0 7 . 5 0C.50 ACRE 10.00 5 . 0 0

4 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 6 1 0 . 4 0C.50 ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 5 . 0 0

16 .00 ACINACRE 1 3 . 0 0ACRE 1 . 3 2ACRE 3 0 . 4 0ACRE 3 . 0 1ACRE 3 . 3 7ACRE 1 0 . 7 2

3 . 1 2 HCUR 4 . 5 0 1 4 . 0 51 . 6 0 HCUR 3 . 5 0 5 . 6 0

4 0 . 8 0 OCL. 0.15 _ -•13ACRE S 2 0 2 . 7 9 S

3 3 0 . 0 0 CRTN 3 . 3 0 _ _ _ ; _ _ _ _ .ACRE s 1155.00 S.

ACRE

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS

6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS

A C R E S 1 3 5 7 . 7 9 S .

$ 4 . 1 1 / C R T N

S 4 5 7 . 2 1 S _ .

4. FIXEO COSTSDEPREC. .INTEREST.TAXES C INSUR.

TRACTOR ACRE 2 2 . 6 3EOUIPMENT ACRE 4 8 . 5 6IRRIGATICN ACRE 2 6 . 4 6

LAND (NET SHARE-RENT) ACRE J___.fiTOTAL FIXEO COSTS ACRE S 1 2 7 . 6 6 S

A C R E S 1 4 6 5 . 6 4 S _

S 4 . 5 0 / C R T N

A C R E S 3 2 9 . 3 6 S

CUCUMBERS ARE PACKED AND MARKETED IN SO POUND CARTONS.BUOGET BASED ON A FALL CROP

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPAREO SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANC ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PREDICT THE COSTS ANO RETURNS FRCM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED AND OEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.

/ ^ * \

Page 23: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

73, CUCUMBERS. IRRIGATEDTEXAS ECWARCS AOUIFER REGION

ESTIMATE!}. COSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

I T E M T I M E S LABCR MACHINE L U B . . R E P • C O S T SOPERATION N O . O AT E OVER HOURS HOURS P E R A C R E P E R A C R E

PICKUP TRUCK 10 NOV 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 C . 3 0SHREOOER 3 , 3 0 JUNE 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 6 3 0 . 1 9 9 1 . 7 0 _ . 1 7O F F S E T O I S C 3 . 3 4 JUNE 2 . 2 0 * C . 5 C 1 0 . 3 8 0 3 . 1 6 9 . 4 4MOLDBOARD PLOW 1 , 3 2 JUNE 1 • CO 0 . 5 7 1 0 . 4 3 2 5 . 7 2 1 2 . 2 8L A N D P L A N E 1 . 5 0 J U N E 0 . 2 0 O.OSO 0 . 0 3 8 0 . 4 4 2 7 . 1 9H E R B I C I D E S P R AY R 6 3 JUNE 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 . 2 6 4 0 . 0 8 2 . 0 8P I C K U P T R U C K 1 0 JUNE 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0ORY FERT SPRDER 3 . 6 0 J U l / Y 1 .00 0 . 2 C 3 0 . 1 5 4 1 . 2 9 3 . 4 4P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 J U LY 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 3 0BEDDER 6R 1 . 3 6 AUG 1 * C 0 0 . 1 5 1 0 . 1 1 5 1 . 3 4 2 . 0 7C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 3 . 3 9 AUG 1 . 0 0 0 . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 3 8 2 . 8 1S TA N H AY P L A N T E R 3 . 4 4 AUG 1 . 0 0 C . 3 C 3 C . 2 3 0 1 . 9 5 4 . 6 1P ICKUP TRUCK 1 0 AUG 0 . 1 0 0 . 1 2 5 0 . 1 0 0 0 . 4 5 0 . 30C U LT I VAT O R 4 R 3 , 3 9 S E P T a _co C . 2 2 7 0 . 1 7 2 1 . 3 8 2 . 8 1P ICKUP TRUCK 10 SEPT o. io . 0 f 1 2 5 -2*122 - 2 * ± 5 - 2 * 3 2

TO TA L S 3 • 1 22 2 . 6 5 6 2 0 . 7 0 7 1 . 3 9

^ V

Page 24: PEANUT COMB. 2R I , 6 7 OCT 1.00 1.084 0-821 10.39 34.37 ...agrilifecdn.tamu.edu/agecoext/files/2013/09/Texas... · 3 d 3 M S N O I 1 3 3 r O t t d 3 S 3 H 1 * N 0 11 . _ _ d 3 H

74.

# * ^

PROJECTIONS FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLYNOT TO BE USED WITHOUT UPOATING AFTER 01/06/61.

CUCUMBERS (PICKLES) IRRIGATEDTEXAS ECWARDS AQUIFER REGION

ESTIMATEO CCSTS ANO RETURNS PER ACRE

B - 1 2 4 K C 1 6 )

CATEGORY

GROSS RECEIPTSCUCUMB. PICKLES

TOTAL PROJECTED RETURNS

PROJECTEDY I E L D U N I T

1 0 5 . 0 0 C U T.

EBQJ___I_La vowS / U N I T V A L U E E S T I M A T E

7 . 0 0 7 3 5 . 9 0 _ _S 735.00 »__.

VARIABLE COSTS INPUT USEPREHARVEST COSTS

CUCUMBER-PCKL SO 2 . 2 5 L B . 8 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0NITROGEN (LIQ) 4 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 3 9 . 2 0PHOSPHATE eo.oo L B . 0 . 3 2 8 6 . 6 0HRBICD. CUCUMBER 1 . 0 0 ACRE 2 0 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0INSECTICIOE 4 . 0 0 AFPL 7 . 5 0 3 0 . 0 0 .PESTICIOE APPLI. 4 . 0 0 ACRE 2 . 5 0 1 0 . 0 0BEEHIVE RENT 0 . 5 0 ACRE 1 0 . 0 0 e.ooNITROGEN (ORY) 4 0 . 0 0 L B . 0 . 2 6 1 0 . 4 0MISC AOMIN 0/H C . 5 0 ACRE 10.00 5 . 0 0IRRIGATION WATER 1 2 . 0 0 ACINFUEL 6 LUBE—TRACTOR ACRE 1 3 . 0 0

EQUIPMENT ACRE C.79IRRIGATION ACRE 2 2 . 8 0

REPAIRS—-»—TRACTOR ACRE 3 . 0 1EQUIPMENT ACRE 3 . 0 0IRRIGATION ACRE 6.C4

LABOR—- — —MACHINERY 2 . 8 7 HCUR 4 . 5 0 1 2 . 9 2IRRIGATION 1 . 2 0 HCUR 3 . 5 0 4 . 2 0OTHER 6 . 0 0 HOUR 3 . 5 0 2 1 . 0 0

OPERATING CAPITAL 4 2 . 5 3 OCL.ACRE

0 . 1 5S

$■_-_*SUBTOTAL. PREHARVEST 2 2 6 . 3 4 S

HARVEST COSTSHARVEST. PICKLES 105 .00 CWT. 3 . 5 0 __--2_S-SUBTOTAL. HARVEST ACRE S 367 .50 «

TOTAL VARIABLE COSTS ACRE s S9S.e4 «

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. VARIABLE CCSTS

3. INCOME ABOVE VARIABLE COSTS

4. PIXEO COSTSDEPREC INTEREST.TAXES £ INSUR.

TRACTOREOUIPMENTIRRIGATICN

LANO (NET SHARE-RENT)TOTAL FtxeO COSTS

5. TOTAL PROJECTED COSTS

BREAK-EVEN PRICE. TOTAL CCSTS

6. NET PROJECTEO RETURNS

S S . 6 7 / C W T .

A C R E S 139.16 S.

ACREACRE

2 2 . 8 34 7 . 9 6

ACRE 1 9 . e 5ACRE

s"—._____1 2 0 . 6 4ACRE s

ACRE s 7 1 6 . 4 8 1

9 6.,82/CWT

ACRE 18.52 S_

PRODUCTION VALUE AND HARVESTING EXPENSE CASED ON A WEIGHTEO AVERAGE OF 8JC-1 *S13%«2*S. 34X#3»S. NAD 4SX»4*S.BUOGET BASEO ON FALL CROP.

INFORMATION PRESENTED IS PREPARED SOLELY AS A GENERAL GUIDE ANO ISNOT INTENDED TO RECOGNIZE OR PRE01CT THE COSTS AND RETURNS FROM ANYONE PARTICULAR FARM OR RANCH OPERATION. THESE PROJECTIONS WERECOLLECTED AND DEVELOPED BY STAFF MEMBERS OF THE TEXAS AGRICULTURALEXTENSION SERVICE AND APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION.