pearson btec level 2 certificate in military engineering (qcf) · unit 6: engineering maintenance...
TRANSCRIPT
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF)
Specification
BTEC Specialist qualification First teaching October 2014
Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications
Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications are awarded by Pearson, the UK’s largest awarding body offering academic and vocational qualifications that are globally recognised and benchmarked. For further information, please visit our qualification websites at www.edexcel.com, www.btec.co.uk or www.lcci.org.uk. Alternatively, you can get in touch with us using the details on our contact us page at www.edexcel.com/contactus
About Pearson
Pearson is the world's leading learning company, with 40,000 employees in more than 70 countries working to help people of all ages to make measurable progress in their lives through learning. We put the learner at the centre of everything we do, because wherever learning flourishes, so do people. Find out more about how we can help you and your learners at: www.pearson.com/uk
References to third party material made in this specification are made in good faith. Pearson does not endorse, approve or accept responsibility for the content of materials, which may be subject to change, or any opinions expressed therein. (Material may include textbooks, journals, magazines and other publications and websites.)
All information in this specification is correct at time of publication.
Authorised by Martin Stretton Prepared by Alice Jones
ISBN 9781446914168
All the material in this publication is copyright © Pearson Education Limited 2014
Contents
Purpose of this specification 1
1 Introducing BTEC Specialist qualifications 3
What are BTEC Specialist qualifications? 3
2 Qualification summary and key information 4
QCF Qualification Number and qualification title 5
Qualification objective 5
Apprenticeships 5
Relationship with previous qualifications 5
Progression opportunities through Pearson qualifications 5
Industry support and recognition 6
Relationship with National Occupational Standards 6
3 Qualification structure 7
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF) 7
4 Assessment 8
5 Recognising prior learning and achievement 9
Recognition of Prior Learning 9
Credit transfer 9
6 Centre resource requirements 10
General resource requirements 10
Specific resource requirements 10
7 Centre recognition and approval centre recognition 12
Approvals agreement 12
8 Quality assurance of centres 13
9 Programme delivery 14
10 Access and recruitment 15
11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs 16
12 Units 17
Unit title 17
Unit reference number 17
QCF level 17
Credit value 17
Guided learning hours 17
Unit aim 17
Essential resources 17
Learning outcomes 17
Assessment criteria 18
Unit amplification 18
Information for tutors 18
Unit 1: Working in Military Engineering 19 Unit 2: Materials, Maths and Science for Military Engineering 35 Unit 3: Principles of Maintenance Technology 45 Unit 4: Principles of Fabrication and Welding Technology 55 Unit 5: Operation and Maintenance of Fluid Power Systems and
Components 63 Unit 6: Engineering Maintenance Procedures 72 Unit 7: Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Systems and
Components 79 Unit 8: Using Bench Fitting Techniques 87 Unit 9: Application of Welding Processes 95
13 Further information and useful publications 104
14 Professional development and training 105
Annexe A 106
Mapping with NVQ/competence-based qualifications 106
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
1
Purpose of this specification
The purpose of a specification as defined by Ofqual is to set out:
● the qualification’s objective
● any other qualification that a learner must have completed before taking the qualification
● any prior knowledge, skills or understanding that the learner is required to have before taking the qualification
● units that a learner must have completed before the qualification will be awarded and any optional routes
● any other requirements that a learner must have satisfied before they will be assessed or before the qualification will be awarded
● the knowledge, skills and understanding that will be assessed as part of the qualification (giving a clear indication of their coverage and depth)
● the method of any assessment and any associated requirements relating to it
● the criteria against which the learner’s level of attainment will be measured (such as assessment criteria)
● any specimen materials
● any specified levels of attainment.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
2
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
3
1 Introducing BTEC Specialist qualifications
What are BTEC Specialist qualifications?
BTEC Specialist qualifications are qualifications from Entry to Level 3 on the Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF). They are work-related qualifications available in a range of sectors. They give learners the knowledge, understanding and skills they need to prepare for employment. The qualifications also provide career development opportunities for those already in work. The qualifications may be offered as full-time or part-time courses in schools or colleges. Training centres and employers may also offer these qualifications.
Some BTEC Specialist qualifications are knowledge components in Apprenticeship Frameworks, i.e. Technical Certificates.
There are three sizes of BTEC Specialist qualification in the QCF:
● Award (1 to 12 credits)
● Certificate (13 to 36 credits)
● Diploma (37 credits and above).
Every unit and qualification in the QCF has a credit value.
The credit value of a unit specifies the number of credits that will be awarded to a learner who has achieved the learning outcomes of the unit.
The credit value of a unit is based on:
● one credit for every 10 hours of learning time
● learning time – defined as the time taken by learners at the level of the unit, on average, to complete the learning outcomes to the standard determined by the assessment criteria.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
4
2 Qualification summary and key information
Qualification title Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF)
QCF Qualification Number (QN) 601/4141/4
Qualification framework Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF)
Regulation start date 30/07/2014
Operational start date 01/10/2014
Approved age ranges 16–18
19+
Credit value 33
Assessment Centre-devised assessment (internal assessment)
Guided learning hours 270–300
Grading information The qualification and units are at pass grade.
Entry requirements No prior knowledge, understanding, skills or qualifications are required before learners register for this qualification. However, centres must follow our Access and Recruitment Policy (see Section 10 Access and recruitment).
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
5
QCF Qualification Number and qualification title
Centres will need to use the QCF Qualification Number (QN) when they seek public funding for their learners. Every unit in a qualification has a QCF unit reference number (URN).
The qualification title, unit titles and QN are given on each learner’s final certificate. You should tell your learners this when your centre recruits them and registers them with us. There is more information about certification in our UK Information Manual, available on our website at: www.edexcel.com/iwantto/Pages/uk-information-manual
Qualification objective
The Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF) is for learners who work in, or who want to work in, the armed forces in an engineering capacity. Learners will choose between two pathways – Maintenance Technology and Fabrication and Welding.
It gives learners the opportunity to:
● develop knowledge related to engineering in a military context
● achieve a nationally-recognised Level 2 qualification that incorporates skills which are transferable to a future civilian career
● develop their personal growth and engagement in learning.
Apprenticeships
Semta, the Sector Skills Council (SSC) for the engineering sector, approves the Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF) as a knowledge component for the Intermediate Apprenticeship in Engineering Manufacture (Operator and Semi-skilled).
Relationship with previous qualifications
This is a new qualification and it does not replace any qualification previously offered by Pearson.
Progression opportunities through Pearson qualifications
Learners who achieve the Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF) can, as they are promoted in the armed services, progress to higher level qualifications.
As the qualification is designed to incorporate elements relevant to engineering in a civilian context, learners who leave military service can use the skills and knowledge they have gained in the qualification in their civilian careers.
After leaving military service, learners can progress to qualifications such as Pearson BTEC Level 3 Nationals in Engineering and Pearson BTEC Level 4 and 5 Higher Nationals, which are available in a wide range of engineering subjects.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
6
Industry support and recognition
This qualification is supported by Semta, the Sector Skills Council for the engineering sector.
Relationship with National Occupational Standards
This qualification relates to the National Occupational Standards in Engineering and Manufacture. The mapping document in Annexe A shows the links between the units in this qualification, the Pearson Edexcel Level 2 NVQ Diploma in Engineering Maintenance and Installation (QCF), and the Pearson Edexcel Level 2 NVQ Diploma in Performing Engineering Operations (QCF).
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
7
3 Qualification structure
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering (QCF)
The learner will need to meet the requirements outlined in the table below before Pearson can award the qualification.
Minimum number of credits that must be achieved 33
Number of mandatory credits that must be achieved 14
Number of core credits that must be achieved 7
Minimum number of optional credits that must be achieved 12
Unit Unit reference number
Mandatory units Learners must complete both units from this group.
Level Credit Guided learning hours
1 K/506/6187 Working in Military Engineering 2 7 60
2 K/506/6190 Materials, Maths and Science for Military Engineering
2 7 60
Core units Learners must complete one unit from this group according to the pathway chosen: Maintenance Technology (Unit 3) or Fabrication and Welding (Unit 4).
3 T/506/6192 Principles of Maintenance Technology
2 7 60
4 A/506/6193 Principles of Fabrication and Welding Technology
2 7 60
Optional units Learners must complete a minimum of 12 credits from this group.
5 H/600/3387 Operation and Maintenance of Fluid Power Systems and Components
2 10 60
6 D/600/0388 Engineering Maintenance Procedures
2 5 30
7 F/600/0402 Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Systems and Components
2 10 60
8 F/506/6194 Using Bench Fitting Techniques 2 7 60
9 K/600/0412 Application of Welding Processes 2 10 60
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
8
4 Assessment
The table below gives a summary of the assessment methods used in the qualification.
Units Assessment method
All units Centre-devised assessment
Centre-devised assessment (internal assessment)
Each unit has specified learning outcomes and assessment criteria. To pass an internally assessed unit, learners must meet all of the unit’s learning outcomes. Centres may find it helpful if learners index and reference their evidence to the relevant learning outcomes and assessment criteria.
Centres need to write assignment briefs for learners to show what evidence is required. Assignment briefs should indicate clearly which assessment criteria are being targeted.
Assignment briefs and evidence produced by learners must meet any additional requirements given in the Information for tutors section of each unit.
Unless otherwise indicated in Information for tutors, the centre can decide the form of assessment evidence (for example performance observation, presentations, projects, tests, extended writing) as long as the methods chosen allow learners to produce valid, sufficient and reliable evidence of meeting the assessment criteria.
Centres are encouraged to give learners realistic scenarios and to maximise the use of practical activities in delivery and assessment.
To avoid over-assessment, centres are encouraged to link delivery and assessment across units.
There is more guidance about internal assessment on our website. For details please see Section 13 Further information and useful publications.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
9
5 Recognising prior learning and achievement
Recognition of Prior Learning
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) is a method of assessment (leading to the award of credit) that considers whether a learner can demonstrate that they can meet the assessment requirements for a unit through knowledge, understanding or skills they already possess and so do not need to develop through a course of learning.
Pearson encourages centres to recognise learners’ previous achievements and experiences in and outside the workplace, as well as in the classroom. RPL provides a route for the recognition of the achievements resulting from continuous learning.
RPL enables recognition of achievement from a range of activities using any valid assessment methodology. If the assessment requirements of a given unit or qualification have been met, the use of RPL is acceptable for accrediting a unit, units or a whole qualification. Evidence of learning must be sufficient, reliable and valid.
Further guidance is available in our policy document Recognition of Prior Learning Policy and Process, available on our website at: www.edexcel.com/policies
Credit transfer
Credit transfer describes the process of using a credit or credits awarded in the context of a different qualification or awarded by a different awarding organisation towards the achievement requirements of another qualification. All awarding organisations recognise the credits awarded by all other awarding organisations that operate within the QCF.
If learners achieve credits with other awarding organisations, they do not need to retake any assessment for the same units. The centre must keep evidence of credit achievement.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
10
6 Centre resource requirements
As part of the approval process, centres must make sure that the resource requirements below are in place before offering the qualification.
General resource requirements
● Centres must have appropriate physical resources (for example IT, learning materials, teaching rooms) to support delivery and assessment.
● Staff involved in the assessment process must have relevant expertise and occupational experience.
● There must be systems in place that ensure continuing professional development (CPD) for staff delivering the qualification.
● Centres must have in place appropriate health and safety policies relating to the use of equipment by learners.
● Centres must deliver the qualification in accordance with current equality legislation. For further details on Pearson’s commitment to the Equality Act 2010, please see Section 10 Access and recruitment and Section 11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs. For full details of the Equality Act 2010, please go to www.legislation.gov.uk
Specific resource requirements
As well as the general resource requirements given above, there are specific resources that centres must provide. They are listed by unit below.
Unit Resources required
1: Working in Military Engineering Access to a suitably equipped workshop, manufacturers’ service manuals, data sheets, parts lists, diagrams and drawings
2: Materials, Maths and Science for Military Engineering
Engineering materials and supplier catalogues
3: Principles of Maintenance Technology
Access to a workshop environment, components, tools, service manuals, data sheets, parts lists, drawings, test schedules and personal protective equipment (PPE)
4: Principles of Fabrication and Welding Technology
Access to a workshop environment, cutting tools, measuring equipment, welding equipment, consumables, materials and personal protective equipment (PPE)
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
11
Unit Resources required
5: Operation and Maintenance of Fluid Power Systems and Components
Fluid power system circuits and components, pneumatic and hydraulic system test rigs, fluid power circuit drawings and computer simulation software, appropriate test equipment, data books and specifications, current health and safety legislation and regulations
6: Engineering Maintenance Access to a workshop, relevant manufacturers’ service manuals, date sheets, parts lists and diagrams and drawings
7: Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Systems and Components
Access to an electrical engineering workshop, industry standard electrical circuits, equipment and systems and their associated components and consumables, appropriate fault-finding instruments, safety equipment and tools, manufacturers’ data books and specifications, maintenance manuals, parts catalogues and/or databases, flow charts, electrical circuit and system diagrams
8: Using Bench Fitting Techniques Access to a workshop with bench fitting equipment, workpiece materials, components and drawings
9: Application of Welding Processes Access to appropriate welding equipment, consumables and materials, destructive and non-destructive test equipment
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
12
7 Centre recognition and approval centre recognition
Centres that have not previously offered Pearson qualifications need to apply for, and be granted, centre recognition as part of the process for approval to offer individual qualifications.
Existing centres will be given ‘automatic approval’ for a new qualification if they are already approved for a qualification that is being replaced by a new qualification and the conditions for automatic approval are met.
Guidance on seeking approval to deliver BTEC qualifications is given on our website.
Approvals agreement
All centres are required to enter into an approval agreement that is a formal commitment by the head or principal of a centre to meet all the requirements of the specification and any associated codes, conditions or regulations.
Pearson will act to protect the integrity of the awarding of qualifications. If centres do not comply with the agreement, this could result in the suspension of certification or withdrawal of approval.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
13
8 Quality assurance of centres
Quality assurance is at the heart of vocational qualifications. The centre assesses BTEC qualifications. The centre will use quality assurance to make sure that their managers, internal verifiers and assessors are standardised and supported. Pearson use quality assurance to check that all centres are working to national standards. It gives us the opportunity to identify and provide support, if needed, to safeguard certification. It also allows us to recognise and support good practice.
For the qualifications in this specification, the Pearson quality assurance model will follow one of the processes listed below.
1 Delivery of the qualification as part of a BTEC Apprenticeship (‘single click’ registration):
● an annual visit by a Standards Verifier to review centre-wide quality assurance systems and sampling of internal verification and assessor decisions.
2 Delivery of the qualification outside the Apprenticeship:
● an annual visit to the centre by a Centre Quality Reviewer to review centre-wide quality assurance systems
● Lead Internal Verifier accreditation – this involves online training and standardisation of Lead Internal Verifiers using our OSCA platform, accessed via Edexcel Online. Please note that not all qualifications will include Lead Internal Verifier accreditation. Where this is the case, each year we will allocate a Standards Verifier to conduct postal sampling of internal verification and assessor decisions for the Principal Subject Area.
For further details please see the UK Vocational Quality Assurance Handbook on our website.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
14
9 Programme delivery
Centres are free to offer this qualification using any mode of delivery (for example full time, part time, evening only, distance learning) that meets their learners’ needs. Whichever mode of delivery is used, centres must make sure that learners have access to the resources identified in the specification and to the subject specialists delivering the units.
Those planning the programme should aim to enhance the vocational nature of the qualification by:
● liaising with employers to make sure that a course is relevant to learners’ specific needs
● accessing and using non-confidential data and documents from learners’ workplaces
● developing up-to-date and relevant teaching materials that make use of scenarios that are relevant to the sector
● giving learners the opportunity to apply their learning in practical activities
● including sponsoring employers in the delivery of the programme and, where appropriate, in assessment
● making full use of the variety of experience of work and life that learners bring to the programme.
Where legislation is taught, centres must ensure that it is current and up to date.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
15
10 Access and recruitment
Pearson’s policy regarding access to our qualifications is that:
● they should be available to everyone who is capable of reaching the required standards
● they should be free from any barriers that restrict access and progression
● there should be equal opportunities for all those wishing to access the qualifications.
Centres are required to recruit learners to BTEC Specialist qualifications with integrity.
Applicants will need relevant information and advice about the qualification to make sure it meets their needs.
Centres should review the applicant’s prior qualifications and/or experience, considering whether this profile shows that they have the potential to achieve the qualification.
For learners with disabilities and specific needs, this review will need to take account of the support available to the learner during teaching and assessment of the qualification. The review must take account of the information and guidance in Section 11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
16
11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs
Equality and fairness are central to our work. Pearson’s Equality Policy requires all learners to have equal opportunity to access our qualifications and assessments. It also requires our qualifications to be awarded in a way that is fair to every learner.
We are committed to making sure that:
● learners with a protected characteristic (as defined by the Equality Act 2010) are not, when they are undertaking one of our qualifications, disadvantaged in comparison to learners who do not share that characteristic
● all learners achieve the recognition they deserve from undertaking a qualification and that this achievement can be compared fairly to the achievement of their peers.
Learners taking a qualification may be assessed in British sign language or Irish sign language where it is permitted for the purpose of reasonable adjustments.
Further information on access arrangements can be found in the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) document Access Arrangements, Reasonable Adjustments and Special Consideration for General and Vocational qualifications.
Details on how to make adjustments for learners with protected characteristics are given in the document Pearson Supplementary Guidance for Reasonable Adjustment and Special Consideration in Vocational Internally Assessed Units.
Both documents are on our website at: www.edexcel.com/policies
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
17
12 Units
Units have the following sections.
Unit title
The unit title is on the QCF and this form of words will appear on the learner’s Notification of Performance (NOP).
Unit reference number
Each unit is assigned a unit reference number that appears with the unit title on the Register of Regulated Qualifications.
QCF level
All units and qualifications within the QCF have a level assigned to them. There are nine levels of achievement, from Entry to Level 8. The QCF Level Descriptors inform the allocation of the level.
Credit value
When a learner achieves a unit, they gain the specified number of credits.
Guided learning hours
Guided learning hours are the times when a tutor, trainer or facilitator is present to give specific guidance towards the learning aim for a programme. This definition covers lectures, tutorials and supervised study in, for example, open learning centres and learning workshops. It also includes assessment by staff where learners are present. It does not include time spent by staff marking assignments or homework where the learner is not present.
Unit aim
This gives a summary of what the unit aims to do.
Essential resources
This section lists any specialist resources needed to deliver the unit. The centre will be asked to make sure that these resources are in place when it seeks approval from Pearson to offer the qualification.
Learning outcomes
The learning outcomes of a unit set out what a learner knows, understands or is able to do as the result of a process of learning.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
18
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria specify the standard required by the learner to achieve each learning outcome.
Unit amplification
This section clarifies what a learner needs to know to achieve a learning outcome.
Information for tutors
This section gives tutors information on delivery and assessment. It contains the following subsections.
● Delivery – explains the content’s relationship to the learning outcomes and offers guidance on possible approaches to delivery.
● Assessment – gives information about the evidence that learners must produce, together with any additional guidance if appropriate. This section should be read in conjunction with the assessment criteria.
● Suggested resources – lists resource materials that can be used to support the teaching of the unit, for example books, journals and websites.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
19
Unit 1: Working in Military Engineering
Unit reference number: K/506/6187
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 7
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit gives learners the opportunity to develop an understanding of what is required to carry out engineering activities in a military environment. Many reference documents and basic engineering skills are consistent across the Army, Navy and Air Force. However, each Service is responsible for its own specialist equipment and the technical, policy and training documentation particular to each.
Engineering working practices in a military environment involve the service, repair, adjustment and modification of engineering plant, equipment and machinery that support military operations both within the UK and across the world, from a tri-service perspective. Engineering in these circumstances requires an element of innovation and robust invention in order to support military operations remotely and locally, all within the letter of the law and under strict guidelines.
This unit introduces learners to the features of engineering procedures that determine their reliability, safety and maintainability. Learners will develop an understanding of the requirements when working in military engineering, emphasising the importance of safety, quality, training, maintenance procedures and planning. Learners will look in detail at health and safety regulations and procedures for the military workplace and the methods of communication used. The unit also introduces learners to the use of technical drawings and specifications in engineering and how to interpret them.
Learners will be expected to understand the requirements for integrating civilian personnel into a military environment. Learners will need to be aware of the steps required and the processes in place to ensure that integration is a success.
Essential resources Access to a military workshop environment that includes a wide range of equipment, systems, devices and components is required. Experiencing military maintenance activities is essential, together with relevant manufacturers’ service manuals, data sheets, parts lists, diagrams and drawings. Relevant test instruments, tools and safety equipment will also be required as appropriate to the equipment, systems, devices and components used. Official support from a current engineering service tradesperson (instructor qualified) as a ‘subject expert’ is also needed.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
20
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
O
utlin
e hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y re
gula
tions
applic
able
to
mili
tary
engin
eeri
ng
oper
atio
ns
□
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y re
gula
tions:
The
Min
istr
y of D
efen
ce (
MO
D)
Hea
lth
and S
afet
y han
dbook
– J
oin
t Ser
vice
Public
atio
n (
JSP)
375 is
applic
able
ac
ross
all
area
s of
MO
D a
nd t
he
Arm
ed F
orc
es.
□
Volu
me
1:
intr
oduct
ion t
o h
ealth a
nd s
afet
y m
anag
emen
t; s
taff h
ealth
and s
afet
y re
sponsi
bili
ties
; guid
ance
on t
he
pro
duct
ion o
f ac
tion p
lans;
M
OD
’s h
ealth a
nd s
afet
y tr
ainin
g s
trat
egy.
□
Volu
me
2:
spec
ific
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y duties
car
ried
out
in t
he
MO
D,
conta
ined
within
a s
erie
s of
leaf
lets
.
□
Volu
me
3:
per
mit-t
o-w
ork
pro
cedure
s (f
or
land-b
ased
act
ivitie
s only
) co
vering h
igh-h
azar
d a
ctiv
itie
s, e
.g.
hig
h v
oltag
e sw
itch
ing (
11000 v
olts
with n
o-b
reak
/short
bre
ak s
yste
ms)
, re
pla
cem
ent
of
X a
nte
nna
pro
tect
ive
pan
els
(inco
rpora
ting w
orki
ng a
t hei
ght/
clea
ring o
f ar
ea),
se
ttin
g u
p o
f te
mpora
ry e
lect
rica
l in
stal
lations
in b
uilt
-up a
reas
(risk
as
sess
men
t/per
mit t
o d
ig e
tc.)
, cl
ose
confinem
ent
area
s su
ch a
s sh
ips.
□
Volu
me
4:
info
rmat
ion for
conduct
ing M
OD
SH
E A
udits.
1
Know
hea
lth a
nd
safe
ty r
egula
tions
for
work
ing in
mili
tary
en
gin
eering
1.2
Sta
te t
he
resp
onsi
bili
ties
of
the
MO
D a
s an
em
plo
yer
to
ensu
re h
ealth a
nd s
afet
y in
th
e w
ork
pla
ce
□
Res
ponsi
bili
ties
of
the
MO
D:
to p
rovi
de
a sa
fe p
lace
of
wor
k, incl
udin
g
safe
acc
ess
to a
nd e
xit
from
it;
a h
ealthy
work
ing e
nvi
ronm
ent;
eq
uip
men
t, m
achin
ery
and s
yste
ms
of w
ork
that
are
saf
e an
d w
ithout
risk
s to
hea
lth;
safe
arr
angem
ents
for
the
use
(in
cludin
g p
roce
ssin
g),
han
dlin
g,
stora
ge,
tra
nsp
ort
atio
n a
nd d
isposa
l of
articl
es a
nd
subst
ance
s; s
uff
icie
nt
info
rmat
ion,
inst
ruct
ion,
trai
nin
g a
nd s
uper
visi
on
to e
nab
le a
ll em
plo
yees
to a
void
haz
ards
and t
o c
ontr
ibute
posi
tive
ly t
o
thei
r ow
n h
ealth a
nd s
afet
y at
work
; an
d a
deq
uat
e w
elfa
re f
acili
ties
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
21
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.3
Id
entify
the
polic
ies
and
pro
cedure
s use
d t
o en
sure
ef
fect
ive
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y im
ple
men
tation in a
mili
tary
en
gin
eering w
ork
pla
ce
□
Mili
tary
polic
ies
and p
roce
dure
s: J
SP3
75 V
olu
me
3 is
man
dat
ory
on t
he
def
ence
est
ate
and is
alig
ned
to t
he
stru
cture
and p
rinci
ple
s of
reco
gnis
ed s
afet
y m
anag
emen
t sy
stem
s, e
.g.
HSG
65 a
nd B
S O
SH
AS
18001,
it a
lso s
erve
s to
ensu
re t
hat
the
requirem
ents
of
UK leg
isla
tion
are
bei
ng m
et;
JSP3
75 –
MO
D H
ealth a
nd S
afet
y H
andbook
is s
ponso
red
by
2nd P
erm
anen
t U
nder
Sec
reta
ry (
PUS)
as P
roce
ss O
wner
for
Saf
ety
(and S
ust
ainab
le D
evel
opm
ent
and E
nvi
ronm
enta
l Pr
ote
ctio
n).
1.4
D
escr
ibe
the
esse
ntial
hea
lth
and s
afet
y re
quirem
ents
to
pro
tect
ser
vice
and c
ivili
an
per
sonnel
and b
ysta
nder
s
□
Ess
ential
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y re
quirem
ents
: e.
g.
Sec
reta
ry o
f Sta
te P
olic
y an
d s
ite
Org
anis
atio
n a
nd A
rran
gem
ents
sta
tem
ent
up t
o dat
e, a
nd
dis
pla
yed t
hro
ughout
site
; lo
cal si
te S
afet
y H
ealth E
nvi
ronm
ent
arra
ngem
ents
/pro
cedure
s m
ainta
ined
up t
o d
ate;
sys
tem
s fo
r re
port
ing
of
Acc
iden
ts/I
nci
den
ts/N
ear
Mis
ses,
sta
ff c
om
pet
ent
for
role
with c
lear
Ter
ms
of
Ref
eren
ce (
OH
S,
RSO
, RPS
, et
c.);
suffic
ient
num
ber
s of
firs
t ai
d t
rain
ed s
taff;
site
SH
E C
om
mitte
e es
tablis
hed
, in
cludin
g t
rade
unio
n
repre
senta
tion a
nd m
eets
reg
ula
rly;
the
follo
win
g a
s re
quired
in p
lace
an
d u
p t
o dat
e: S
ite
Haz
ard R
egis
ter,
Site
Ris
k Ass
essm
ents
, risk
as
sess
men
ts,
Asb
esto
s M
anag
emen
t Pl
an (
AM
P),
Rad
on M
anag
emen
t Pla
n (
wher
e nec
essa
ry),
Leg
ionel
la M
anag
emen
t Pla
n,
Fire
Saf
ety
Man
agem
ent
Plan
s (F
SM
P),
Com
pre
hen
sive
Em
ergen
cy P
roce
dure
s, 4
C's
sy
stem
, si
gnag
e, p
rote
ctiv
e bar
rier
s, P
PE a
vaila
ble
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
22
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.5
Sta
te t
he
types
and
clas
sifica
tion o
f hea
lth a
nd
safe
ty s
igns
use
d in a
n
engin
eering/m
anufa
cturing
envi
ronm
ent
□
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y si
gns:
as
required
by
the
Hea
lth a
nd S
afet
y (S
afet
y Sig
ns
and S
ignal
s) R
egula
tions
1996 (
the
Saf
ety
Sig
ns
Reg
ula
tions)
, w
hic
h im
ple
men
t Euro
pea
n C
ounci
l D
irec
tive
92/5
8/E
EC o
n m
inim
um
re
quirem
ents
for
the
pro
visi
on o
f sa
fety
sig
ns
at w
ork
; CH
IP –
Chem
ical
s (H
azar
d I
nfo
rmat
ion a
nd P
acka
gin
g f
or
Supply
) Reg
ula
tions.
□
Typ
es a
nd c
lass
ific
atio
n:
as s
et o
ut
in J
SP3
75 V
olu
me
2 L
eaflet
44
‘Saf
ety
Sig
ns’
: pro
hib
itio
n s
ign –
bla
ck p
icto
gra
m o
n a
white
bac
kgro
und
with r
ed e
dgin
g a
nd d
iagonal
lin
e; w
arnin
g s
ign –
bla
ck p
icto
gra
m o
n a
ye
llow
or
amber
bac
kgro
und w
ith b
lack
edgin
g;
man
dat
ory
sig
n –
white
pic
togra
m o
n a
blu
e bac
kgro
und;
safe
conditio
n s
ign –
white
pic
togra
m
on a
gre
en b
ackg
round;
fire-
fighting s
ign –
white
pic
togra
m o
n a
red
bac
kgro
und.
1.6
O
utlin
e th
e ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
within
the
chai
n o
f co
mm
and o
f per
sonnel
with r
esponsi
bili
ty
for
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y
□
Role
s an
d r
esponsi
bili
ties
: as
set
out
in J
SP375 V
olu
me
1.
□
Em
plo
yer
(see
Unit a
mplif
icat
ion f
or
1.2
).
□
Line
man
ager
– iden
tify
haz
ards
and a
sses
s risk
s in
volv
ed w
ith t
he
activi
ties
under
thei
r co
ntr
ol;
elim
inat
e haz
ards
or
imple
men
t co
ntr
ol
mea
sure
s; s
upply
sta
ff w
ith a
deq
uat
e in
form
atio
n,
inst
ruct
ion a
nd
trai
nin
g;
ensu
re s
taff a
re a
deq
uat
ely
super
vise
d;
inve
stig
ate
and r
eport
an
y in
jury
to a
mem
ber
of
thei
r st
aff
or
any
per
son r
esultin
g fro
m t
he
activi
ties
under
thei
r co
ntr
ol in
acc
ord
ance
with M
OD
polic
y.
□
All
staf
f to
tak
e re
asonab
le c
are
for
thei
r hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y, a
nd t
he
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y of
oth
er p
erso
ns
affe
cted
by
thei
r ac
ts o
r om
issi
ons;
co
oper
ate
with t
hei
r em
plo
yer
to e
nsu
re M
OD
dis
char
ges
its
leg
al
oblig
atio
ns
(e.g
. at
tendin
g m
andat
ory
tra
inin
g,
report
ing a
ccid
ents
);
report
any
haz
ards
or
short
falls
in M
OD
saf
ety
syst
ems
to t
hei
r lin
e m
anag
er.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
23
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
O
utlin
e sa
fe w
ork
ing
pra
ctic
es t
hat
shou
ld b
e fo
llow
ed in t
he
work
pla
ce
□
Saf
e w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
: e.
g.
suffic
ient
num
ber
s of firs
t ai
d t
rain
ed
per
sonnel
; hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y in
duct
ion t
rain
ing c
om
ple
ted a
nd r
efre
sher
tr
ainin
g a
vaila
ble
; use
of per
sonal
pro
tect
ive
equip
men
t, c
orr
ect
lifting
and h
andlin
g t
echniq
ues
, m
ainta
inin
g a
tid
y w
ork
are
a, c
orre
ct d
isposa
l of
was
te m
ater
ials
; per
mit t
o w
ork
; is
ola
tion;
risk
ass
essm
ents
com
ple
te
(both
site
and t
ask
focu
sed);
rep
ort
ing o
f in
juries
; id
entifica
tion o
f noi
se
haz
ardous
area
s; h
ealth s
urv
eilla
nce
pro
gra
mm
e in
pro
gre
ss.
2
Know
pro
cedure
s to
follo
w t
o e
nsu
re
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y in
the
mili
tary
en
gin
eering
work
pla
ce
2.2
D
escr
ibe
the
hum
an,
envi
ronm
enta
l an
d s
ervi
ce
conditio
ns
that
lea
d t
o
acci
den
ts in t
he
work
pla
ce
and w
ays
of co
ntr
olli
ng
them
□
Hum
an c
onditio
ns:
e.g
. la
ck o
f kn
ow
ledge
or
skill
, im
pro
per
motiva
tion,
phys
ical
or
men
tal st
ress
, in
adeq
uat
e phys
ical
or
psy
cholo
gic
al
capab
ility
, fa
ilure
to w
arn o
r si
gnal
, nulli
fyin
g s
afet
y dev
ices
, oper
atin
g
without
auth
ority
, co
mbat
situat
ions.
□
Way
s of
contr
ol:
e.g
. tr
ainin
g p
rogra
mm
es,
robust
contr
ol st
rate
gie
s (w
elfa
re s
upport
, su
per
viso
ry a
ctiv
itie
s, a
ssig
nin
g r
esponsi
bili
ties
),
dev
elop s
kills
, pro
vide
enco
ura
gem
ent
and c
lear
inst
ruct
ion,
phys
ical
an
d m
enta
l pre
par
atio
n f
or
com
bat
situat
ions.
□
Envi
ronm
enta
l co
nditio
ns:
e.g
. haz
ardous
atm
osp
her
ic c
onditio
ns,
in
adeq
uat
e ill
um
inat
ion o
r nois
e, c
onges
tive
work
ing e
nvi
ronm
ent,
pro
ject
ion h
azar
ds,
haz
ardous
pla
cem
ent
or
stora
ge,
com
bat
situat
ions.
□
Way
s of
contr
ol:
e.g
. risk
rec
ognitio
n p
roce
ss,
effe
ctiv
e co
mm
unic
atio
n
with a
ll st
aff,
appro
priat
e si
gnag
e, P
PE a
s re
quired
, tr
ainin
g in h
ot,
Arc
tic
or
incl
emen
t en
viro
nm
enta
l co
nditio
ns.
□
Ser
vice
conditio
ns:
e.g
. in
adeq
uat
e w
arnin
g s
yste
ms,
inad
equat
e des
ign
or
mai
nte
nan
ce,
inad
equat
e pro
visi
on o
f co
rrec
t eq
uip
men
t fo
r m
ainte
nan
ce,
inad
equat
e PP
E,
inad
equat
e w
ork
and p
urc
has
ing
stan
dar
ds,
norm
al w
ear
and t
ear.
□
Way
s of
contr
ol:
e.g
. re
dev
elopm
ent
of co
ntr
ol st
rate
gie
s (r
isk
asse
ssm
ents
, pla
nnin
g b
ette
r pro
visi
on o
f re
sourc
es,
set
obje
ctiv
es a
nd
stan
dar
ds,
red
efin
e an
d im
ple
men
t im
pro
ved s
yste
ms,
pro
cedure
s an
d
work
inst
ruct
ions)
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
24
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.3
D
efin
e w
hat
is
mea
nt
by
a dan
ger
ous
occ
urr
ence
□
D
anger
ous
occ
urr
ence
: as
def
ined
in A
nnex
B o
f JS
P375 V
olu
me
2
Leaf
let
14.
2.4
D
escr
ibe
how
to
carr
y ou
t a
risk
ass
essm
ent
□
Ris
k as
sess
men
t: a
s det
aile
d in J
SP3
75 V
olu
me
2 L
eaflet
39 –
5 s
teps
to
risk
ass
essm
ent.
2.5
Id
entify
pote
ntial
haz
ards
that
a r
isk
asse
ssm
ent
may
re
veal
□
Pote
ntial
haz
ards:
anyt
hin
g t
hat
may
cau
se h
arm
or
has
the
pote
ntial
to
cause
har
m,
e.g.
man
ual
han
dlin
g,
exposu
re t
o h
azar
dous
subst
ance
s,
nois
e, v
ibra
tion,
work
ing a
t hei
ght,
lifting o
per
atio
ns,
confined
spac
es,
exposu
re t
o el
ectr
icity,
tra
nsp
ort
, ex
pose
d m
achin
ery,
con
stru
ctio
n
activi
ties
, ra
dia
tion,
exce
ssiv
e st
ress
, pre
ssure
sys
tem
s, e
xposu
re t
o blo
od-b
orn
e vi
ruse
s, e
xplo
sive
atm
osp
her
es a
nd d
evic
es,
fatigue,
ex
cess
ive
hea
t or
cold
, fire
, lig
hting lev
els.
2.6
D
escr
ibe
met
hods
of
fire
pre
vention a
nd c
ontr
ol in
ac
cord
ance
with h
ealth a
nd
safe
ty p
olic
y in
a m
ilita
ry
engin
eering w
ork
pla
ce
□
Fire
pre
vention a
nd c
ontr
ol:
robust
induct
ion t
o en
sure
that
indiv
idual
s kn
ow
the
follo
win
g in t
he
work
pla
ce:
fire
ala
rm,
evac
uat
ion r
oute
s,
evac
uat
ion a
ssem
bly
poin
t, loca
tion a
nd h
ow t
o o
per
ate
fire
ex
tinguis
her
s an
d fire
alar
ms,
the
emer
gen
cy t
elep
hone
num
ber
for
airc
raft
fire
and e
mer
gen
cies
(se
par
ate
num
ber
s),
actions
to b
e ta
ken
on d
isco
vering a
fire,
rule
s re
lating t
o t
he
oper
atio
n o
f fire
doors
, th
e lo
cation o
f th
e m
ain iso
lation s
witch
es,
the
loca
tion a
nd c
onte
nts
of th
e fire
saf
ety
notice
boar
d (
e.g.
two-h
at s
yste
m,
the
fire
saf
ety
man
agem
ent
pla
n).
2.7
O
utlin
e pro
cedure
s use
d t
o
mak
e a
haz
ardous
area
saf
e bef
ore
sta
rtin
g w
ork
, in
ei
ther
a m
ilita
ry o
r a
civi
lian
work
pla
ce
□
Proce
dure
s to
mak
e a
haz
ardous
area
saf
e: e
.g.
emer
gen
cy a
nd d
isas
ter
pla
nnin
g s
trat
egy;
hea
lth s
urv
eilla
nce
and h
ealth m
onitoring
pro
gra
mm
e; r
isk
asse
ssm
ents
com
ple
ted (
e.g.
man
ual
han
dlin
g,
CO
SH
H,
wor
king a
t hei
ghts
, co
nfined
spac
es,
lifting o
per
atio
ns,
el
ectr
icity
safe
ty,
off
ice
safe
ty,
contr
ol of
nois
e);
man
agem
ent
of PP
E,
per
mit t
o w
ork
pro
cedure
, firs
t ai
d a
t w
ork
; lo
ne
work
ing p
roce
ss;
safe
use
of pre
ssure
sys
tem
s; D
SEAR if ap
plic
able
; sa
fety
sig
ns
in p
lace
; m
anag
emen
t of
asb
esto
s an
d a
sbes
tos-
conta
inin
g m
ater
ials
; bar
rier
s in
pla
ce;
contr
ol of
vibra
tion n
eeded
; 4C s
yste
m in p
lace
that
man
ages
vi
siting w
ork
ers
and c
ontr
acto
rs;
safe
ty in e
xcav
atio
n p
roce
dure
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
25
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
Id
entify
the
com
munic
atio
n
syst
ems
use
d in m
ilita
ry a
nd
civi
lian e
ngin
eering
work
pla
ces
□
Com
munic
atio
n s
yste
ms
use
d in b
oth m
ilita
ry a
nd c
ivili
an e
ngin
eering
work
pla
ces:
e.g
. em
ail;
tel
ephone;
engin
eering w
ebsi
tes
iden
tify
ing
upgra
des
/com
mon f
aults
on e
quip
men
t use
d;
gro
up b
rief
s on iden
tify
ing
task
del
egat
ion a
nd t
hei
r priorities
; vi
sual
man
agem
ent
boa
rds
within
th
e w
ork
shop o
f ta
sks,
sta
ges
of re
pai
r/co
mple
tion,
targ
et d
ates
; ve
rbal
/vis
ual
lin
e m
anag
emen
t/te
am lea
der
direc
tion o
n c
urr
ent
engin
eering p
roce
sses
and p
roce
dure
s; s
atel
lite
syst
ems,
rad
io s
yste
ms;
dig
ital
sys
tem
s; w
ritt
en c
om
munic
atio
n.
□
Com
munic
atio
n s
yste
ms
use
d in m
ilita
ry e
ngin
eering w
ork
pla
ces
only
: D
efen
ce I
nte
rnal
Brief
s (D
IBs)
on t
he
Def
ence
Intr
anet
(i.e.
an
nounce
men
t of th
e D
efen
ce E
quip
men
t an
d S
upport
Mat
eria
l Str
ateg
y);
Inte
rnal
Brief
ing N
otes
(IB
Ns)
(i.e.
form
atio
n o
f 906
exped
itio
nar
y w
ing);
Def
ence
Inst
ruct
ions
and N
otice
s (D
INs)
(i.e.
eq
uip
men
t ta
ble
s, s
cale
s an
d s
ched
ule
); join
t se
rvic
e public
atio
ns
iden
tify
ing a
nd inst
ruct
ing p
erso
nnel
on c
om
mon p
ract
ices
, in
form
atio
n
and g
uid
elin
es e
xpec
ted o
n a
wid
e ra
nge
of
equip
men
t/se
rvic
es/C
OP/
safe
ty;
air
public
atio
ns
ensu
ring c
orr
ect
engin
eering p
ract
ices
car
ried
out
on p
articu
lar
equip
men
t; S
tation
Routine
Ord
ers
det
ailin
g c
orr
ect
action r
equired
by
per
sonnel
within
st
atio
n b
oundar
ies
incl
udin
g e
ngin
eering a
reas;
Sta
tion E
ngin
eering
Ord
ers
det
ailin
g s
pec
ific
engin
eering iss
ues
/act
ion o
n s
pec
ific
eq
uip
men
t.
3
Know
effec
tive
m
ethods
of
com
munic
atio
n f
or
an e
ngin
eering
envi
ronm
ent
3.2
O
utlin
e th
e ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
within
the
chai
n o
f co
mm
and in a
m
ilita
ry w
ork
shop
□
Role
s an
d r
esponsi
bili
ties
: as
set
out
in A
P(D
)100E-1
5 M
anag
emen
t of
G
ener
al E
ngin
eering W
orks
hops
and A
ssoci
ated
Equip
men
t an
d t
he
ove
rall
contr
ol def
ined
by
the
rele
vant
serv
ice,
HQ
or
unit,
e.g.
Sen
ior
Engin
eering O
ffic
er (
Leve
l K)
has
ove
rall
resp
onsi
bili
ty f
or
work
shop
equip
men
t on t
hei
r unit;
resp
onsi
bili
ty is
dis
char
ged
thro
ugh e
ither
the
esta
blis
hed
Gro
und S
upport
Equip
men
t Contr
olle
r, O
ffic
er C
om
man
din
g
use
r se
ctio
n,
Avi
atio
n W
ork
shops
Man
ager
, or
auth
orise
d inve
nto
ry
hold
er a
nd incl
udes
oper
atio
n w
ithin
the
unit’s
Qual
ity
Man
agem
ent
Sys
tem
(Q
MS).
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
26
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.3
Id
entify
a r
ange
of so
urc
es
of
engin
eering info
rmat
ion
□
Sourc
es o
f en
gin
eering info
rmat
ion:
e.g.
man
ufa
cture
r’s
docu
men
tation/h
andboo
k; u
nit/l
oca
l en
gin
eeri
ng o
rder
s; B
ritish
Sta
ndar
ds;
Def
ence
Sta
ndar
ds;
Qual
ity
Sta
ndar
ds;
tra
de
trai
nin
g
docu
men
tation;
equip
men
t ai
r public
atio
ns;
arm
y eq
uip
men
t su
pport
public
atio
ns;
engin
eering w
ebsi
tes,
Inte
rnat
ional
Sta
ndar
ds;
appro
ved
codes
of
pra
ctic
e; e
ngin
eering p
olic
y docu
men
tation;
work
inst
ruct
ions
and p
roce
dure
s; h
isto
rica
l m
ainte
nan
ce d
ocu
men
tation;
notice
boar
ds;
en
gin
eering lea
flet
s/m
agaz
ines
; su
bje
ct m
atte
r ex
per
ts (
SM
Es)
with
exper
ience
in t
hei
r fiel
d;
RAF
Engin
eering P
olic
y.
3.4
Id
entify
appro
priat
e so
urc
es
of
advi
ce a
nd g
uid
ance
□
Sourc
es o
f ad
vice
and g
uid
ance
: e.
g.
team
lea
der
, lin
e m
anag
er,
engin
eering s
upport
tea
m f
or
spec
ialis
t SM
E s
upport
, eq
uip
men
t use
r co
mm
unity
list
for
regio
nal
/nat
ional
advi
ce o
n e
ngin
eering iss
ues
, m
ilita
ry p
ublic
atio
ns
libra
ry.
3.5
D
escr
ibe
the
import
ance
of
mai
nta
inin
g g
ood
rela
tionsh
ips
with inte
rnal
an
d e
xter
nal
sta
kehold
ers
□
Mai
nta
inin
g g
ood r
elat
ionsh
ips:
e.g
. giv
es c
ontinuity
of
key
supplie
r ro
ute
s/pro
visi
on;
allo
ws
regula
r, s
truct
ure
d a
nd info
rmal
com
munic
atio
n
route
s bet
wee
n t
he
inte
rnal
/ext
ernal
sta
kehold
ers,
whic
h in t
urn
lea
ds
to a
n o
pen
and h
ones
t re
lationsh
ip;
pro
mote
s cl
ear
expec
tations
and
under
stan
din
g o
f th
e se
rvic
es n
eeded
/pro
vided
; if p
roble
m r
esolu
tion
pro
cess
es a
re w
ell def
ined
and u
sed,
this
ensu
res
min
or
pro
ble
ms
do
not
esca
late
and c
ause
rel
atio
nsh
ip iss
ues
, av
oid
ing a
‘bla
me
culture
’.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
27
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.1
D
escr
ibe
how
tec
hnic
al
dra
win
gs
and s
pec
ific
atio
ns
are
use
d in e
ngin
eering
□
Tec
hnic
al d
raw
ings
and s
pec
ific
atio
ns:
how
tec
hnic
al d
raw
ings
and
tech
nic
al s
pec
ific
atio
ns
rela
te t
o e
ach
oth
er;
conte
nts
, e.
g.
stan
dar
ds
of
mat
eria
ls a
nd w
ork
man
ship
req
uired
, det
ails
of
the
work
req
uired
to
achie
ve c
om
ple
tion,
det
ails
of
fact
ory
tes
ts r
equired
, ty
pe
and n
um
ber
(i
.e.
pre
ssure
tes
ts,
tensi
le t
esting).
4.2
In
terp
ret
the
esse
ntial
in
form
atio
n f
ound o
n
tech
nic
al d
raw
ings
usi
ng
curr
ent
stan
dar
ds
□
Ess
ential
info
rmat
ion:
def
ines
what
a p
art
looks
lik
e, h
ow
it
is m
ade
and
how
it
fits
toget
her
with o
ther
par
ts.
□
Curr
ent
stan
dar
ds:
as
set
out
in t
he
Man
ual
of Engin
eering D
raw
ing,
incl
udin
g t
echnic
al p
roduct
spec
ific
atio
n a
nd d
ocu
men
tation t
o B
ritish
an
d I
nte
rnat
ional
Sta
ndar
ds,
abbre
viat
ions
and s
ymbols
, dra
win
g
com
ponen
ts,
dim
ensi
onin
g,
geo
met
ric
tole
rance
s, let
tering,
tole
rance
s.
4.3
D
escr
ibe
the
purp
ose
of
stan
dar
ds
in e
ngin
eering
□
Purp
ose
: to
ensu
re t
hat
pro
duct
s, ite
ms
or
par
ts c
onsi
sten
tly
mee
t th
e st
andar
ds
set,
whet
her
they
are
British
or
Inte
rnat
ional
Sta
ndar
ds;
to
enco
ura
ge
man
ufa
cture
rs/d
esig
ner
s/oper
ators
to a
dher
e to
a c
om
mon
m
ethod f
or
that
par
ticu
lar
stan
dar
d/s
pec
ific
atio
n.
4.4
D
escr
ibe
how
spec
ific
atio
ns
and q
ual
ity
syst
ems
are
use
d in e
ngin
eering
□
Spec
ific
atio
ns:
use
d in e
ngin
eering t
o s
upple
men
t an
d a
dd s
trin
gen
cy t
o
spec
ific
nee
ds
and c
larify
ISO
9001 r
equirem
ents
in o
rder
to p
rovi
de
a st
andar
dis
ed a
nd c
onsi
sten
t ap
pro
ach
□
Qual
ity
syst
ems:
the
Qual
ity
Man
agem
ent
Sys
tem
(Q
MS)
is s
tandar
d
thro
ughout
mili
tary
org
anis
atio
ns
and incl
udes
all
work
shop
s th
at h
ave
mili
tary
/civ
ilian
per
sonnel
res
ponsi
ble
for
carr
ying o
ut
engin
eering a
nd
logis
tic
activi
ties
.
4
Under
stan
d
engin
eering
dra
win
gs
and
spec
ific
atio
ns
4.5
In
terp
ret
stan
dar
d
conve
ntions
use
d o
n
tech
nic
al d
raw
ings
□
Sta
ndar
d c
onve
ntions
use
d o
n t
echnic
al d
raw
ings:
e.g
. 1st
/3rd
angle
pro
ject
ion,
tech
nic
al s
ketc
h,
mec
han
ical
dra
ftin
g,
com
pute
r-ai
ded
dra
ftin
g (
CAD
).
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
28
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
5.1
D
escr
ibe
polic
ies
that
rel
ate
to r
ights
and r
esponsi
bili
ties
in
mili
tary
em
plo
ymen
t
□
Polic
ies
that
rel
ate
to r
ights
and r
esponsi
bili
ties
in m
ilita
ry e
mplo
ymen
t:
AP1
iden
tifies
mili
tary
eth
os,
core
val
ues
and s
tandar
ds
emphas
isin
g
resp
ect,
inte
grity
, se
rvic
e, e
xcel
lence
; AP3
376 det
ails
ter
ms
and
conditio
ns
of
serv
ice
of tr
ade
per
sonnel
; em
plo
ymen
t, c
aree
r an
d
com
pet
ency
str
uct
ure
s e.
g.
for
airm
en,
incl
udin
g c
om
man
d m
anag
emen
t tr
ainin
g c
ours
es;
Quee
n’s
Reg
ula
tions
det
ailin
g m
any
aspec
ts incl
udin
g
gen
eral
ser
vice
pro
fici
ency
and q
ual
ific
atio
ns
for
pro
motions;
Hum
an
Res
ourc
es M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
(H
RM
S)
for
MO
D e
mplo
yees
; org
anis
atio
nal
str
uct
ure
cle
arly
iden
tify
ing r
ole
s, r
ights
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
.
5
Know
about
work
ing in
engin
eering
5.2
D
escr
ibe
how
to
work
ef
fect
ivel
y in
a m
ilita
ry a
nd
civi
lian e
ngin
eering
work
pla
ce
□
Work
effec
tive
ly:
e.g.
adher
ing t
o p
olic
y st
atem
ents
; en
suring t
rade
abili
ty a
nd c
om
pet
ence
is
at t
he
corr
ect
leve
l in
the
work
pla
ce;
a ro
bust
an
d f
unct
ionin
g m
anag
ing s
afet
y re
gim
e; c
lear
visi
on o
f th
e en
d g
oal
an
d t
he
outp
ut
required
; en
suring g
ood lea
der
ship
and m
anag
emen
t of
all st
aff;
ensu
ring e
quip
men
t, p
roce
sses
, pro
cedure
s an
d w
ork
in
stru
ctio
ns
are
fully
funct
ional
and f
it f
or
purp
ose
; em
phas
is o
n g
ood
qual
ity
and s
afet
y sy
stem
s.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
29
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
5.3
G
ive
reas
ons
for
poss
ible
co
nflic
t si
tuat
ions
in a
m
ilita
ry a
nd c
ivili
an
engin
eering w
ork
pla
ce,
and
way
s to
avo
id t
hem
□
Conflic
t si
tuat
ions:
rea
sons,
e.g
. m
ilita
ry s
tandar
ds
of
dis
ciplin
e,
diffe
rence
s in
the
stan
dar
ds
expec
ted f
rom
both
a m
ilita
ry a
nd c
ivili
an
per
spec
tive
(M
AA P
olic
y an
d C
AA P
olic
y),
stan
dar
ds
of th
e bas
ic a
nd
trad
e tr
ainin
g e
xper
ience
d b
y a
mili
tary
em
plo
yee
as o
ppos
ed t
o a
ci
vilia
n (
AP1
and A
P3376).
□
Way
s to
avo
id:
e.g.
a co
nsi
sten
t an
d h
igh lev
el o
f w
ork
pla
ce s
tandar
ds
and inst
ruct
ions
from
induct
ion t
rain
ing t
o a
war
enes
s of up-t
o-d
ate
chan
ges
in p
olic
y st
atem
ents
; st
rong lea
der
ship
fro
m e
nco
mpas
sing
both
mili
tary
and c
ivili
an n
eeds.
5.4
Sta
te t
he
role
s an
d
resp
onsi
bili
ties
of
team
m
ember
s in
a m
ilita
ry a
nd
civi
lian e
ngin
eering
work
pla
ce
□
Role
s: e
.g.
in R
AF
– m
ilita
ry r
ole
s in
clude
Off
icer
Com
man
din
g t
he
Flig
ht,
Sen
ior
Non-C
om
mis
sioned
Offic
er/M
anag
er,
Non-C
om
mis
sioned
O
ffic
er/S
uper
viso
r, S
enio
r Aircr
afts
man
/Pro
duce
r; c
ivili
an r
ole
s in
clude
Lead
ing C
har
ge
Han
d,
Char
ge
Han
d,
Civ
ilian
Mec
han
ic,
Civ
ilian
Tec
hnic
ian.
□
Res
ponsi
bili
ties
: as
outlin
ed o
n t
he
Ter
ms
of Ref
eren
ce iss
ued
to e
ach
team
mem
ber
, det
ailin
g p
articu
lar
role
within
the
man
agem
ent
chai
n
and o
utlin
ing r
esponsi
bili
ties
for
that
par
ticu
lar
role
.
5.5
D
escr
ibe
how
to
work
ef
fect
ivel
y in
a t
eam
in a
m
ilita
ry a
nd c
ivili
an
engin
eering w
ork
pla
ce
□
Work
effec
tive
ly:
contr
ibuto
ry f
acto
rs,
e.g.
trai
nin
g,
ethos,
com
mon
goal
s, p
ride,
innova
tion,
inve
ntive
nes
s, c
om
mitm
ent
to q
ual
ity,
join
t w
elfa
re p
rovi
sion,
cam
arad
erie
, co
rrec
t eq
uip
men
t pro
visi
on,
team
work
aw
ay d
ays
(hig
h/l
ow
rop
e ex
erci
ses)
.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
30
Information for tutors
Delivery
Since most learners are unlikely to have had prior experience in this area of work, it is essential to have some formal introduction to the content. The unit can then be regarded as essentially investigative. Visits to military engineering workshops would allow learners to carry out a practical investigation and through open discussion clarify essential points within the unit amplification.
The approach will be best determined through a tutor analysis of each learner’s needs and, in particular, through consideration of the range of types of military workshop they are working with or preparing their learners for. Whichever approach is taken, the learner’s experience should be sufficiently varied to provide them with knowledge and understanding of military engineering processes, procedures and planning in most military settings.
This unit is largely theoretical, although learners should have the opportunity to examine a range of military engineering workshops, particularly with regard to health and safety procedures. The unit is best delivered through a programme of lectures followed by some form of practical investigations or activities.
The unit gives learners an opportunity to work individually or in groups when planning or discussing military engineering policy, processes, training and procedures.
The learning outcomes are ordered logically and it would be a reasonable approach to develop them sequentially throughout the unit. In this way, the learner will understand military engineering requirements and then be able to carry out activities that support their understanding.
Tutors should always ensure that each learner has the correct personal protective equipment and that systems are safe for inspection and operation. It is also important that learners work in a safe manner when visiting a military establishment.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Learning outcomes 1 and 2 could be covered through an assignment that requires learners to respond to pre-set questions. These questions may be based around a case-study style scenario or test questions that have each been set within a relevant military engineering context. In either case, it is most likely that controlled conditions will be required to ensure the authenticity of the responses. For assessment criterion 1.1, learners will need to outline all four volumes of JSP375. For 1.2, learners should state at least three of the MOD’s responsibilities as an employer. For 2.1, they should outline at least four safe working practices. For 2.2, they should describe at least one type of human, one type of environmental and one type of service condition with ways of controlling each. For 2.6, at least five potential hazards should be identified. For 2.7, learners need to outline at least four procedures used to make a hazardous area safe.
Learning outcome 3 could be assessed using a practical assignment that requires learners to identify the resources required for effective communication within a
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
31
military engineering environment. The communicative piece should be simple and include processes for engineering support from ‘source to output’, for example ‘engine change required on a Chinook helicopter that is grounded overseas in Afghanistan’. Tutor observation will be necessary during the activity to capture the process evidence of correct communications being used, whilst adhering to the safe use of correct procedures. The evidence collected by direct observation could be supported with evidence from professional discussion or from authenticated reflective accounts provided by the learner. For 3.1, learners should identify at least four communication systems common to military and civilian engineering workplaces, and at least four communication systems used in military workplaces only. For 3.3, at least five sources of engineering information need to be identified, and at least three sources of advice and guidance for 3.4.
Learning outcome 4 could be assessed using a practical assignment that requires learners to understand engineering drawings and specifications within a military engineering environment. The engineering drawings and specifications piece should be simple and include processes for engineering support from ‘source to output’, for example ‘modification required to improve performance of MK12 Air Starting Trolley’. Tutor observation will be necessary during the activity to capture the process evidence of engineering drawings and specifications being used. The evidence collected by direct observation could be supported with evidence from professional discussion or from authenticated reflective accounts provided by the learner.
Learning outcome 5 could be assessed using a practical assignment that requires learners to show knowledge of how to work effectively in a military engineering environment. The working in engineering piece should be simple and include processes for engineering support from ‘source to output’, for example ‘setting up a forward operating base in a remote location’. Tutor observation will be necessary during the activity to capture the process evidence of equipment being used, detailed requirements, facilities provision etc., whilst adhering to the safe use of correct procedures. The evidence collected by direct observation could be supported with evidence from professional discussion or from authenticated reflective accounts provided by the learner. For 5.1, learners need to describe at least three policies. For 5.3, at least two reasons for possible conflict situations are required, with ways to avoid each.
Learners will also need to produce a report that includes the identification of resources and all handover documentation and completed records.
An alternative approach to assessment could be for learners to build a portfolio of evidence for the unit as a whole as they carry out a range of investigations and operations in the workplace.
A further alternative method could be the use of an integrated assignment, which links this unit with other practical units in a programme of study. If this approach is adopted, the evidence for the specific learning outcomes and associated assessment criteria will need to be identified clearly.
Suggested resources
Publications
Some of the following publications are specific to the Royal Air Force. Equivalent publications for the other Services should be used as required.
Air Publication 1 Royal Air Force Ethos, Core Values and Standards
Air Publication 2 Continuous Improvement
Air Publication 100C-10 Quality Assurance Activity Manual
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
32
Air Publication 3376 Vol 1 Ground Trade Personnel and Non-Commissioned Aircrew T&C of Service
Air Publication 3376 Vol 2 Employment, Careers and Competency Structures for Airman of the RAF
Air Publication 7001 Leadership in the RAF
Air Publication (Digital) 100E-15 Military Aviation Workshop Support Management and Policy
Approved Code of Practice HSG65
Fire Safety Order No.2
Joint Air Publication 100E-10 Military Aviation GSE Management & Policy
Joint Service Publication 375 MOD Health and Safety Handbook
Joint Service Publication 912 Human Factors Integration for Defence Systems
Manual of Maintenance and Airworthiness Processes 001
Manual of Maintenance and Airworthiness Processes 002
Military Aviation Authority
OSHAS 18001
Queen’s Regulations (RAF)
Legislation
British Standards
Civil Aviation Authority
COSHH Regulations
DSEAR Regulations
Health & Safety at Work Act 1974
Health & Safety Signs Regulations 1996
International Standards
ISO 9001:2008
RIDDOR
Websites
www.hse.gov.uk – Health and Safety Executive
www.raf.mod.uk – Royal Air Force
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
33
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Exploring a given engineering activity from different perspectives to identify the resources required
Reflective learners
Reviewing progress with the engineering activity in a military workshop, acting on outcomes
Self-managers Working towards a successful engineering activity in a military workshop, showing initiative, commitment and perseverance
Organising time and resources, prioritising actions when carrying out an engineering activity in a military workshop
Effective participators
Identifying improvements when planning and carrying out a engineering activity that would benefit themselves and others
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Reflective learners
Evaluating experiences during workshop activities to inform progress with engineering tasks
Team workers Collaborating with others when working in groups to gather information on engineering tasks and planning
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
34
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Finding and selecting information
Select information from a variety of sources to meet requirements of a complex task
Selecting and using the sources of information required to carry out an engineering activity independently
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Speaking and listening to operators/supervisors when planning for and carrying out engineering activity within a military workshop
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Comparing, selecting, reading and understanding resource material when preparing for a given engineering activity
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Writing documents in support of all engineering activity and explaining effect of resulting outputs, whether serviceability states or long term reliability
Writing documents to describe planned and unplanned maintenance procedures
Writing reports to document the maintenance procedures carried out on an engineering activity in a military workshop
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
35
Unit 2: Materials, Maths and Science for Military Engineering
Unit reference number: K/506/6190
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 7
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim Working in an engineering workshop requires knowledge and understanding of the materials found within the components and products being used. In this unit learners will have the opportunity to investigate the properties of these materials.
This unit gives learners knowledge and understanding of the technology applied to military engineering. This will involve considering materials that are commonly used in military engineering solutions, and finding out about and understanding the properties of certain materials and how these properties can be altered.
Workshop calculations using simple mathematics are important and learners will have the opportunity to practise and use these mathematical skills when applied to military engineering problems. These skills are also required for scientific applications in a military environment, such as circuit parameter calculations.
Learners will develop the skills needed to apply analytical methods to military engineering mathematical applications. This will involve calculating areas and volumes of various shapes and solids, and calculating angles and lengths of objects. Learners will use graphical information to find relationships between parameters.
As well as using analytical methods in mathematical applications, learners will use them to solve problems in military engineering scientific applications. This will include calculating work carried out by simple machines along with the power used and energy generated. In doing so, learners will be able to calculate efficiency in terms of mechanical and electrical power and energy.
Essential resources For this unit learners must have access to a range of engineering materials and supplier catalogues.
Although not essential, access to scientific equipment suitable for determining mechanical properties, work carried out by simple machines, power and strength of materials would be useful, as would a range of simple machines and equipment used to determine circuit parameters and to carry out heat-treatment processes.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
36
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
Id
entify
the
range
of
mat
eria
ls c
om
monly
use
d in
mili
tary
engin
eeri
ng
□
Ran
ge
of m
ater
ials
: fe
rrous
mat
eria
l, e
.g.
cast
iro
n,
low
to
hig
h c
arbon
st
eel, s
tain
less
ste
el;
non-f
erro
us
mat
eria
l, e
.g.
alum
iniu
m,
bra
ss,
bro
nze
, co
pper
, le
ad;
ther
mopla
stic
s, e
.g.
PVC,
nyl
on,
PTFE
, poly
then
e,
Per
spex
; th
erm
ose
ttin
g p
oly
mer
, e.
g.
Bak
elite,
Form
ica,
mel
amin
e;
smar
t m
ater
ials
, e.
g.
pie
zoel
ectr
ic m
ater
ials
, sh
ape
mem
ory
allo
ys,
mag
net
o-r
heo
stat
ic f
luid
s, e
lect
ro-r
heo
stat
ic f
luid
s, K
evla
r; c
om
posi
tes,
e.
g.
gla
ss fib
re,
carb
on fib
re,
aram
id f
ibre
; ru
bber
.
1.2
D
escr
ibe
the
form
s of su
pply
of
mat
eria
ls
□
Form
s of
supply
: fo
rm,
e.g.
bar
sto
ck (
flat
, ro
und,
squar
e, h
exag
onal
),
shee
t m
ater
ials
, pip
e/tu
be,
wire,
rolle
d s
teel
sec
tions,
cas
tings,
forg
ings,
m
ould
ings,
ext
rusi
ons,
pow
der
s an
d f
luid
s; s
urf
ace
finis
h,
e.g.
bright
dra
wn,
cold
dra
wn,
pla
ted,
pai
nte
d,
pla
stic
coat
ed;
size
, e.
g.
dia
met
er(s
), t
hic
knes
s, g
auge.
1
Know
about
mat
eria
ls u
sed in
engin
eering
1.3
Id
entify
mat
eria
ls b
y phys
ical
met
hods
□
Phys
ical
met
hods:
tac
tile
met
hods,
e.g
. to
uch
, w
eight,
tex
ture
; vi
sual
, e.
g.
colo
ur,
appea
rance
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
37
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
D
escr
ibe
the
phys
ical
pro
per
ties
of
mat
eria
ls
□
Phys
ical
pro
per
ties
: m
elting p
oin
ts o
f m
etal
s, d
ensi
ty,
colo
ur,
m
agnet
ism
, co
nduct
ivity,
insu
lation;
chem
ical
and d
ura
bili
ty,
e.g.
resi
stan
ce t
o c
orr
osi
on,
solv
ents
, en
viro
nm
enta
l deg
radat
ion,
wea
r.
2.2
D
efin
e w
hat
is
mea
nt
by
mec
han
ical
pro
per
ties
of
mat
eria
ls
□
Def
initio
n o
f m
echan
ical
pro
per
ties
: te
nsi
le s
tren
gth
, to
ughnes
s,
har
dnes
s, e
last
icity,
duct
ility
, m
alle
abili
ty.
2.3
D
escr
ibe
the
mec
han
ical
pro
per
ties
of
mat
eria
ls
□
Mec
han
ical
pro
per
ties
: te
nsi
le,
com
pre
ssiv
e an
d s
hea
r st
rength
; to
ughnes
s, h
ardnes
s, e
last
icity,
duct
ility
, m
alle
abili
ty.
2
Know
about
the
pro
per
ties
of
engin
eering
mat
eria
ls
2.4
D
escr
ibe
met
hods
of
modifyi
ng p
roper
ties
of
mat
eria
ls
□
Met
hods
of m
odific
atio
n:
hea
t tr
eatm
ent,
e.g
. an
nea
ling,
har
den
ing,
norm
alis
ing,
tem
per
ing;
surf
ace
trea
tmen
ts,
e.g.
case
har
den
ing,
pla
ting,
coat
ing;
effe
cts
of
cold
work
ing.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
38
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
Apply
appro
priat
e deg
ree
of
accu
racy
to e
xpre
ss
num
ber
s
□
Deg
ree
of
accu
racy
: dec
imal
pla
ces,
sig
nific
ant
figure
s, fra
ctio
ns
as a
dec
imal
quan
tity
.
3.2
Cal
cula
te t
he
area
s of
bas
ic
shap
es
□
Bas
ic s
hap
es:
squar
e, r
ecta
ngle
, tr
iangle
, ci
rcle
.
3.3
Cal
cula
te t
he
area
s of
com
pound s
hap
es
□
Com
pou
nd s
hap
es:
L-sh
apes
, par
alle
logra
ms,
oth
er s
hap
es,
e.g.
invo
lvin
g s
quar
es,
rect
angle
s, t
rian
gle
s, c
ircl
es,
sem
icircl
es,
quad
rants
of
a ci
rcle
.
3.4
Cal
cula
te t
he
surf
ace
area
s of
regula
r sh
aped
solid
s □
Reg
ula
r so
lids:
cube,
rec
tangula
r prism
, cy
linder
(cu
rved
surf
ace
area
only
).
3.5
Cal
cula
te t
he
volu
mes
of
regula
r sh
aped
solid
s □
Reg
ula
r so
lids:
cube,
rec
tangula
r prism
, cy
linder
.
3.6
D
eter
min
e th
e va
lue
of
angle
s in
trian
gle
s □
Trian
gle
s: r
ight-
angle
d,
isosc
eles
, eq
uila
tera
l.
3.7
U
se S
ine,
Cosi
ne
and
Tan
gen
t ru
les
and
Pyth
agora
s’ T
heo
rem
to
solv
e right-
angle
d t
rian
gle
pro
ble
ms
□
Rig
ht-
angle
d t
rian
gle
: bas
e, a
dja
cent,
hyp
oten
use
.
□
Proble
ms:
e.g
. dis
tance
bet
wee
n h
ole
cen
tres
, dia
gonal
dis
tance
acr
oss
a se
ctio
n,
slope
or
incl
ine,
len
gth
of st
rength
enin
g w
eb,
slope
of
a lin
ear
gra
ph.
3
Be
able
to u
se
anal
ytic
al m
ethods
in e
ngin
eering
mat
hem
atic
al
applic
atio
ns
3.8
U
se d
ata
found o
n a
str
aight
line
gra
ph t
o inte
rpre
t a
rela
tionsh
ip
□
Str
aight
line
gra
phs:
det
erm
inin
g g
radie
nt;
inte
rcep
t; f
indin
g
rela
tionsh
ips,
e.g
. dis
tance
tra
velle
d,
linea
r ac
cele
ration,
work
done;
giv
en d
ata
(incl
udin
g s
cale
s, a
xes,
X c
oord
inat
es,
Y c
oord
inat
es,
usi
ng
giv
en d
ata)
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
39
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.1
D
efin
e w
ork
done
by
a si
mple
mac
hin
e □
W
ork
done:
def
initio
n;
solv
ing p
roble
ms
by
form
ula
e, f
orc
e x
dis
tance
m
ove
d.
□
Sim
ple
mac
hin
e: e
.g.
incl
ined
pla
ne,
pulle
y, lev
er.
4.2
Cal
cula
te p
ow
er u
sed
□
Typ
es o
f pow
er:
mec
han
ical
, el
ectr
ical
.
4.3
Cal
cula
te e
ner
gy
use
d
□
Typ
es o
f en
ergy:
mec
han
ical
, el
ectr
ical.
4.4
Cal
cula
te t
he
effici
ency
of
a m
achin
e □
Effic
iency
: m
echan
ical
(pow
er,
ener
gy)
, el
ectr
ical
(pow
er,
ener
gy)
.
4.5
Solv
e si
mple
ele
ctri
cal ci
rcuit
pro
ble
ms
usi
ng O
hm
’s law
□
Circu
it p
roble
ms:
ser
ies
and p
aral
lel ci
rcuit n
etw
ork
s; c
urr
ent
and
resi
stan
ce d
ata
for
calc
ula
tion
s; d
efin
itio
n o
f O
hm
’s L
aw.
4
Be
able
to u
se
anal
ytic
al m
ethods
in e
ngin
eering
scie
nce
ap
plic
atio
ns
4.6
Cal
cula
te t
he
stre
ngth
of
engin
eering m
ater
ials
, quoting t
he
answ
er u
sing
appro
priat
e m
ultip
le p
refix
sym
bols
□
Str
ength
of m
ater
ials
: ca
lcula
tions,
e.g
. yi
eld s
tres
s, t
ensi
le s
tres
s,
per
centa
ge
elongat
ion;
use
of
gra
phs,
e.g
. fo
rce/
exte
nsi
on g
raph,
stre
ss/s
trai
n g
raph.
□
Multip
le p
refix
sym
bols
: fa
ctor,
e.g
. 10
6,
10
3;
nam
e, e
.g.
meg
a, k
ilo;
sym
bol, e
.g.
M,
k.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
40
Information for tutors
Delivery
This unit should be delivered using lectures, tutor demonstrations and practical engineering activities. Centres must ensure sufficient coverage of the learning outcomes and content.
Learning outcome 1 is best delivered by practical means, whereby learners have access to a range of engineering materials and are able to touch and feel the materials, comparing the physical forms with those found in supplier catalogues. Learning outcomes 2 and 3 are again best suited to a practical approach. Learners could carry out simple mechanical tests and simple heat treatment processes to develop their knowledge of mechanical properties and methods of modifying them. Finally, learning outcome 4 requires learners to develop and practise their skills in carrying out calculations for a range of scientific applications associated with engineering.
For learning outcome 1, learners must be made aware of, and have access to, a range of different engineering materials. Tutors should ensure that each learner has knowledge of ferrous, non-ferrous, thermoplastic and thermosetting polymers, SMART materials and composites. Referring regularly to suppliers’ catalogues is good practice. Learners need to have tactile contact with these materials and being in a military engineering workshop environment would be advantageous. Each learner could develop a simple checklist, or a competition about identifying the most materials could be set up, increasing learner motivation.
Learning outcome 2 will again be addressed better if learners have access to a military engineering workshop environment, relevant equipment that can demonstrate mechanical properties and, if possible, equipment to demonstrate and investigate physical properties. This learning outcome could be delivered so that learners see for themselves how these properties are measured and modified through experience of testing and heat treatment processes.
Learning outcomes 3 and 4 require practise with calculations involving mathematical and scientific applications. Preferably learners should be given an opportunity to perform practical activities with electrical circuits to confirm calculations using Ohm’s Law. Likewise, using test equipment to produce load extension graphs for materials would be beneficial in developing their knowledge of strength of materials.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
41
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Much of the assessment evidence for this unit could come from written activities, including a range of solutions to problems using skills of calculation, and could be based on outcomes from practical activities. Learning outcomes 1 and 2 are probably best assessed through a written assignment. Learning outcomes 3 and 4 are likely to be practical exercises, in the form of a range of calculations to be carried out. Learner work used as evidence for practical activities should be supported by witness testimony or observation records.
Two assignments could be used for the assessment of this unit. However, this would involve a large number of tasks within each assignment addressing the individual criteria, so it may be preferable to have one assignment for each learning outcome. In this case the first, relating to learning outcome 1, would cover assessment criteria 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. This could be a written assignment with a practical element requiring learners to identify at least one material for each type of material, i.e. ferrous, non-ferrous, thermoplastic and thermosetting polymers, SMART materials and composites. This practical element should be extended by giving learners the opportunity to identify these materials by tactile and visual methods. A record of this will need to be made, for example by ensuring that each material has a label and that learners use this labelling to identify the different materials on a written record, along with details of the physical methods they used to help in this identification.
A second assignment, relating to learning outcome 2, would cover assessment criteria 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4. A holistic written assignment giving learners the opportunity to describe the physical and mechanical properties of a range of materials would be most suitable. This range should be similar to that used for assessment criterion 1.1. Learners should also be given a task asking them to define the full range of mechanical properties: tensile strength, toughness, hardness, elasticity, ductility, malleability. Learners should have opportunities to describe both heat treatment and surface treatment methods of modifying properties for criterion 2.4.
Assessment criteria 3.1 to 3.8 could be addressed through a third assignment. This would be purely practical with a range of questions or tasks to address the assessment criteria. For 3.1, the range of tasks given must include opportunities to demonstrate the degree of accuracy using decimal places, significant figures and fractions as a decimal quantity. The task for 3.2 must include calculating areas for all four shapes listed in the unit amplification. The task for 3.3 must include L-shapes, parallelograms and one from other shapes listed in the unit amplification. When setting tasks for the areas and volumes of regular shaped solids, for 3.4 and 3.5 respectively, all three solids should be covered (cube, rectangular prism, cylinder), however only the curved surface area is required to be calculated for the cylinder for 3.4. When setting a task for determining the angles of triangles, care must be taken to ensure all three triangles are covered as ranged by the unit amplification for 3.6. For 3.7, at least two problems need to be given to enable Pythagoras’ Theorem to be used. These problems should be of an engineering nature. Finally, for 3.8, a task should be given that involves the learner interpreting a straight line relationship. They will need to determine the gradient and intercept and be able to find at least one of the relationships such as distance travelled, linear acceleration or work done. Different graphs could be given to different learners to help authenticity. In many of the tasks for this learning outcome, different problems or data could be given to different learners to help authenticity.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
42
The last assignment, addressing assessment criteria 4.1 to 4.6, should be similar to that for learning outcome 3 and be purely practical, with a range of questions or tasks to address the assessment criteria. For 4.1, the task should include the need to define work done but also to solve a problem using the appropriate formulae, force x distance moved. Tasks addressing 4.2 and 4.3 should give learners opportunities to calculate for both mechanical and electrical systems power and energy respectively. A further task is then required that asks learners to calculate efficiency of both mechanical and electrical machines in terms of power and energy to address 4.4. To address 4.5 a task needs to be developed that allows Ohm’s Law to be used on both series and parallel circuits to find potential difference, current and resistance. Finally, 4.6 should be addressed using a task that gives learners the opportunity to calculate yield stress or tensile stress or percentage elongation and use an appropriate graph. The outcomes will need to be quoted using multiple prefix symbols. In doing so, at least two materials need to be considered.
Suggested resources
Books
Aldis B – Mathematics for Technicians (McGraw Hill, 2002) ISBN 9780074711576
Askeland D – Science and Engineering of Materials (Cengage Publishing, 2006) ISBN 9780495244424
Bird J – Basic Engineering Mathematics (Elsevier, 2005) ISBN 9780750665759
Bolton W - Newnes Engineering Materials Pocket Book (Newnes, an imprint of Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd; 3rd Revised edition, 2000) ISBN 9780750649742
Clarke S, Darbyshire A, Mantovani B, Weatherill B – BTEC Level 2 First Engineering (Heinemann, 2010) ISBN 9781846907234
Clarke S, Darbyshire A, Goulden S, Hallgarth C, Watkins N – BTEC Level 2 First Engineering Student Book (Pearson Education, 2012) ISBN 9781446902431
Sullivan M and Shackelford J – Introduction to Materials Science for Engineers (Prentice Hall, 2004) ISBN 9780131276192
Tooley M, Deacon M, O’Dwyer N – Engineering Level 2 Higher Diploma Student Book (Heinemann, 2008) ISBN 9780435756208
Tooley M – BTEC First in Engineering (Newnes, 2006) ISBN 9780750680608
Websites
www.bbc.co.uk/schools/ks3bitesize/maths
www.khanacademy.org/math
www.learnerstv.com/Free-Maths-video-lecture-courses.htm
www.onlinemathlearning.com
www.freestudy.co.uk
www.key2study.com
www.matweb.com – database of materials and properties
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
43
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Identifying information used on given engineering documentation Identifying the forms of supply available for a given engineering material
Analysing and evaluating information, judging its relevance and value
Exploring issues and problems relating to electrical and mechanical engineering science
Creative thinkers
Asking questions when reviewing the properties of engineering materials to extend their thinking
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Creative thinkers
Trying out alternatives or new solutions to mathematical problems
Trying out alternatives or new solutions to electrical and mechanical engineering science problems
Reflective learners
Explaining the properties that are used to define the behaviour of common engineering materials
Describing the properties of a given engineering material
Reviewing progress when solving problems during the learner’s activities and acting on the outcomes to make corrections to understanding/solutions
Team workers Participating in small groups to carry out exercises in material identification and forms of supply
Collaborating with others when working on investigative group work to achieve a valid solution
Self-managers Preparing for and carrying out set assignments
Organising time and resources, prioritising actions
Organising time and resources to carry out practical work relating to electrical and mechanical engineering science experiments and investigations
Effective participators
Discussing issues relating to the properties and applications of engineering materials
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
44
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Finding and selecting information
Select information from a variety of sources to meet requirements of a complex task
Identifying forms of supply available for engineering materials
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Speaking with and listening to peers and supervisors to establish an understanding of mathematical concepts and issues in engineering
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Selecting, reading and using appropriate mathematical data sources to solve engineering problems
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Taking notes and solving engineering mathematical problems to communicate accurate solutions effectively
Mathematics
Representing – selecting the mathematics and information to model a situation
Recognising the relevant parameters and formulae to be applied to given situations involving areas, volumes, right-angled triangles and scientific applications
Analysing – processing and using mathematics
Using mathematical skills in given situations involving areas, volumes, right-angled triangles and scientific applications
Interpreting – interpreting and communicating the results of the analysis
Checking the results of solutions to given situations involving areas, volumes, right-angled triangles and scientific applications to evaluate their effectiveness and reality at each stage of the calculation
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
45
Unit 3: Principles of Maintenance Technology
Unit reference number: T/506/6192
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 7
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit gives learners the opportunity to explore the basic principles of engineering maintenance in order to develop an understanding of how to perform maintenance activities safely in engineering environments.
Learners will investigate the importance of following specified procedures and complying with generic health and safety requirements and policies specific to the military workplace.
Learners will understand how planned maintenance can minimise or eliminate downtime due to failure, and will explore a range of fault finding techniques. They will understand the importance of planning so that the correct tools, equipment and documentation are available for a maintenance procedure. Learners will look at a range of activities associated with maintenance procedures, including the use of access equipment, safe lifting and moving of heavy items, how to replace life-determined components and apply lubricants, and how to dismantle and reassemble engineering systems and devices. They will also learn about the need to restore work areas to a tidy condition, correctly dispose of waste materials and fill out relevant documentation on completion of the procedure.
Essential resources For this unit centres need to provide access to a workshop environment so that engineering maintenance procedures can be demonstrated. A range of equipment is required; this should include components, tools, service manuals, data sheets, parts lists, drawings, test schedules and personal protective equipment (PPE).
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
46
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
D
escr
ibe
safe
work
ing
pra
ctic
es a
nd h
ealth a
nd
safe
ty r
equirem
ents
when
ca
rryi
ng o
ut
mai
nte
nan
ce
pro
cedure
s
□
Ow
n a
nd o
ther
s’ r
espon
sibili
ties
: e.
g.
Hea
lth a
nd S
afet
y at
Work
Act
and
rela
ted leg
isla
tion,
Pers
onal
Pro
tect
ive
Equip
men
t at
Wor
k Reg
ula
tions,
M
anual
Han
dlin
g O
per
ations
Reg
ula
tions,
Con
trol of
Subst
ance
s H
azar
dous
to H
ealth R
egula
tions,
the
Min
istr
y of
Def
ence
(M
OD
) H
ealth
and S
afet
y H
andbook
– J
oin
t Ser
vice
Public
atio
n (
JSP)
375 –
applic
able
ac
ross
all
area
s of
MO
D a
nd t
he
Arm
ed F
orc
es,
work
pla
ce p
olic
ies
and
pro
cedure
s, e
quip
men
t is
ola
tion/l
ock
-off,
per
mit-t
o-w
ork
, w
ork
pla
ce
pre
par
atio
n a
nd c
lean
dow
n,
sign o
ff p
roce
dure
.
□
Em
ergen
cy p
roce
dure
s: w
ork
shop inci
den
ts,
appro
priat
e qual
ifie
d
per
sons
to m
anag
e in
ciden
ts,
actions
to t
ake,
inci
den
t re
port
ing.
1.2
Id
entify
the
haz
ards
asso
ciat
ed w
ith m
ainte
nan
ce
pro
cedure
s
□
Haz
ards:
hig
h-p
ress
ure
flu
ids,
fla
mm
able
mat
eria
ls,
hig
h v
oltag
e el
ectr
icity,
hea
vy e
quip
men
t, lubrica
nts
, cl
eanin
g flu
ids,
dam
aged
/bad
ly
mai
nta
ined
tools
, not
follo
win
g s
pec
ifie
d m
ain
tenan
ce p
roce
dure
s.
1.3
Id
entify
dat
a use
d for
refe
rence
purp
ose
s w
hen
pla
nnin
g a
nd c
arry
ing o
ut
a m
ainte
nan
ce p
roce
dure
□
Dat
a: e
.g.
man
ufa
cture
rs’ se
rvic
e m
anual
s, s
ervi
cing s
ched
ule
s an
d
logs,
fau
lt r
eport
s, a
ssem
bly
dra
win
gs,
sys
tem
dia
gra
ms,
tec
hnic
al
spec
ific
atio
ns,
com
ponen
t dat
abas
es.
1
Know
how
to
pre
par
e fo
r m
ainte
nan
ce
activi
ties
usi
ng
safe
and e
ffec
tive
w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
1.4
D
escr
ibe
types
of
pla
nned
an
d u
npla
nned
mai
nte
nan
ce
pro
cedure
s
□
Proce
dure
s: p
lanned
mai
nte
nan
ce,
e.g.
sched
ule
d r
outine
serv
icin
g,
pre
venta
tive
, co
nditio
n m
onitoring,
per
form
ance
tes
ting,
front
line;
unpla
nned
mai
nte
nan
ce,
e.g.
bre
akdow
n,
run t
o f
ailu
re.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
47
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.5
D
escr
ibe
the
fact
ors
to b
e co
nsi
der
ed w
hen
pla
nnin
g a
m
ainte
nan
ce p
roce
dure
□
Fact
ors
: tim
esca
les,
min
imis
atio
n o
f dow
ntim
e, e
conom
ics
of
repai
r or
repla
ce c
om
ponen
ts,
tools
and e
quip
men
t, a
vaila
bili
ty o
f m
ainte
nan
ce
per
sonnel
, av
aila
bili
ty o
f sp
are
par
ts,
loca
tion o
f eq
uip
men
t re
quirin
g
mai
nte
nan
ce,
on-s
ite
serv
ices
, e.
g.
elec
tric
ity,
wat
er,
com
pre
ssed
air,
dis
posa
l of
was
te m
ater
ials
; co
nsu
mab
les,
e.g
. so
lven
ts,
clea
nin
g
mat
eria
ls,
lubrica
nts
, w
eldin
g e
lect
rodes
, drill
bits,
nuts
, bolts,
scr
ews,
lo
ckin
g w
ire.
1.6
D
escr
ibe
the
pro
cedure
for
rein
stat
ing a
work
are
a fo
llow
ing s
pill
age
of
a haz
ardous
fluid
□
Proce
dure
s: a
ppro
ved w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
when
usi
ng a
bso
rben
t su
bst
ance
s, d
eter
gen
ts a
nd s
olv
ents
; dis
posa
l of
was
te m
ater
ials
; si
gn-
off
docu
men
tation.
1.7
O
utlin
e fa
ult f
indin
g
tech
niq
ues
and a
ssoci
ated
re
fere
nce
mat
eria
ls
□
Tec
hniq
ues
: vi
sual
chec
ks,
e.g.
leak
age,
dam
age,
mis
sing p
arts
, ove
rhea
ting,
wea
r/det
erio
ration,
mal
funct
ion;
senso
ry c
hec
ks,
e.g.
sound,
smel
l, t
ouch
; m
echan
ical
chec
ks,
e.g.
oper
atio
n o
f m
ovi
ng p
arts
, co
rrec
t w
ork
ing c
lear
ance
s, b
elt/
chai
n t
ensi
on,
bea
ring loadin
g,
torq
ue
load
ing o
f fa
sten
ings,
hyd
raulic
sys
tem
pre
ssure
s; e
lect
rica
l ch
ecks
, e.
g.
continuity,
voltag
e, c
urr
ent,
res
ista
nce
; te
chniq
ues
, e.
g.
six
poin
t, h
alf
split
, in
put/
outp
ut,
com
ponen
t su
bst
itution.
□
Ref
eren
ce m
ater
ials
: re
pai
r m
anual
s, f
low
char
ts,
chec
klis
ts,
dra
win
gs,
m
ainte
nan
ce r
ecord
s, p
erfo
rman
ce d
ata,
equip
men
t se
lf-d
iagnost
ic
report
ing.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
48
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
D
escr
ibe
how
to
use
acc
ess
equip
men
t so
that
a
mai
nte
nan
ce p
roce
dure
can
be
carr
ied o
ut
under
saf
e co
nditio
ns
□
Equip
men
t: e
.g.
step
ladder
s, lad
der
s, p
latf
orm
s, s
caffold
ing,
cher
ry-
pic
kers
, sc
isso
r lif
ts,
scre
w jac
ks,
hyd
raulic
jac
ks,
mobile
hois
ts,
four-
post
hois
ts,
ram
ps,
hea
vy lift
airb
ags,
under
-car
tro
lley,
axl
e st
ands.
□
Saf
e co
nditio
ns:
equip
men
t oper
atin
g inst
ruct
ions,
e.g
. hei
ght
rest
rict
ions,
tyi
ng in/o
n,
guar
d r
ails
, ce
ntr
e of gra
vity
posi
tion,
slip
and
fall
pre
vention,
corr
ect
footing,
inte
r-lo
cks.
2.2
D
escr
ibe
safe
tec
hniq
ues
for
lifting h
eavy
load
s □
Tec
hniq
ues
: su
spen
sion,
e.g.
chai
ns,
ropes
, w
ire
slin
gs,
pulle
y blo
cks,
w
inch
es;
atta
chm
ent,
e.g
. hooks
, sh
ackl
es,
eye
bolts;
dam
age
pre
vention,
e.g.
pad
din
g,
wooden
blo
cks;
load
ing p
aram
eter
s, e
.g.
safe
w
ork
ing load
, ce
ntr
e of gra
vity
; eq
uip
men
t, e
.g.
ove
rhea
d g
antr
y cr
anes
, m
obile
cra
nes
, der
rick
s, t
ripods,
fork
lifts
, hea
vy lift
airb
ags,
ra
tchet
lev
er h
ois
ts.
2.3
O
utlin
e how
to m
ove
hea
vy
equip
men
t ac
ross
a f
lat
surf
ace
□
Move
men
t usi
ng:
rolle
rs,
pull-
lifts
, cr
ow
bar
, ro
ller
pin
ch b
ar;
load
m
ovi
ng s
kate
s, e
.g.
fixe
d w
hee
l, s
teer
able
, ca
terp
illar
.
2.4
D
escr
ibe
corr
ect
sele
ctio
n
and u
se o
f to
ols
when
ca
rryi
ng o
ut
a m
ainte
nan
ce
pro
cedure
□
Han
d t
ools
: e.
g.
torq
ue
wre
nch
, im
pac
t drive
r, c
ircl
ip p
liers
, so
ft fac
ed
mal
let,
ham
mer
, drift
s, h
ub p
ulle
r, b
earing e
xtra
ctor,
scr
ew d
rive
rs,
hex
ke
ys,
feel
er g
auges
, sp
anner
s, s
ock
et s
ets,
sold
erin
g iro
n,
de-
sold
erin
g
tool, p
liers
, cr
impin
g t
ools
, w
ire
cutt
ers,
wire
stripper
s, t
aps,
die
s, e
asy-
outs
, drills
, sp
ring c
om
pre
ssors
.
□
Pow
er t
ools
: e.
g.
drill,
scr
ewdrive
r, a
ngle
grinder
, nut
drive
r.
2
Know
how
to
sele
ct w
ork
ing
met
hods,
too
ls a
nd
equip
men
t
2.5
D
escr
ibe
how
to
per
form
co
nfo
rmity
chec
ks u
sing
mea
suring e
quip
men
t
□
Mea
sure
men
ts:
e.g.
pos
itio
nal
, al
ignm
ent,
cle
aran
ce,
bac
klas
h/s
lack
, su
rfac
e co
nditio
n,
torq
ue
sett
ings,
pre
ssure
, flow
rat
e, v
oltag
e, c
urr
ent.
□
Equip
men
t: e
.g.
rule
s, t
apes
, sq
uar
es,
feel
er g
auges
, m
icro
met
er,
Ver
nie
r ca
liper
s, V
ernie
r hei
ght
gau
ge,
dia
l te
st indic
ator,
spirit lev
el,
bel
t te
nsi
on g
auge,
las
er d
evic
es,
elec
tric
al m
ulti-
met
er,
pre
ssure
gau
ge,
optica
l dev
ices
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
49
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.6
D
escr
ibe
the
repla
cem
ent
of
life-
det
erm
ined
com
pon
ents
□
Li
fe-d
eter
min
ed c
ompon
ents
: e.
g.
bat
teries
, el
ectr
ic m
oto
r bru
shes
, filter
s, lubrica
ting o
il, h
ydra
ulic
oil,
bea
rings,
bra
king c
om
ponen
ts,
clutc
hes
, se
als
and g
aske
ts,
hig
h t
ensi
le b
olts
and w
asher
s, lock
ing
dev
ices
, st
ruct
ura
l co
mponen
ts.
□
Rep
lace
men
t: r
epla
ce in a
ccord
ance
with m
anufa
cture
r’s/
oper
ator
spec
ifie
d p
roce
dure
s.
2.7
D
escr
ibe
met
hods
and
purp
ose
for
apply
ing
lubrica
nts
□
Met
hods:
e.g
. bru
sh,
spra
y, s
pla
sh,
pre
ssure
fee
d,
gre
ase
gun a
nd
nip
ple
.
□
Purp
ose
: re
duce
d frict
ion,
reduce
d w
ear
bet
wee
n s
lidin
g p
arts
, sm
oot
her
ru
nnin
g,
hea
t dis
sipat
ion,
incr
ease
d life
of
com
ponen
ts,
reduce
d s
urf
ace
deg
radat
ion.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
50
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
D
escr
ibe
how
to
dis
man
tle
an e
ngin
eering s
yste
m o
r dev
ice
□
Dis
man
tle:
pre
par
e e.
g.
sequen
ce o
f oper
atio
ns,
iso
late
and lock
off,
rele
ase
pre
ssure
/forc
e/el
ectr
ical
char
ge,
iden
tifica
tion m
arki
ng a
nd
stora
ge
of
com
ponen
ts;
rem
ova
l of
lock
ing d
evic
es,
e.g.
wire
lock
s, t
ab
was
her
s, c
lips,
split
pin
s; r
emova
l of re
tain
ing d
evic
es,
e.g.
nuts
, bolts,
st
uds,
scr
ews,
pin
s, d
ow
els,
key
s, c
ircl
ips,
riv
ets;
ext
ract
ing
com
ponen
ts,
e.g.
bea
rings,
shaf
ts,
gea
rs,
couplin
gs,
springs,
sea
ls,
gas
kets
, va
lves
, m
oto
rs,
elec
tric
al/
elec
tronic
com
ponen
ts,
fluid
pow
er
com
ponen
ts.
3.2
D
escr
ibe
how
to
re-
asse
mble
an e
ngin
eering
syst
em o
r dev
ice
□
Re-
asse
mble
: so
urc
e re
pla
cem
ent
com
ponen
ts,
e.g.
single
com
ponen
ts,
sub-a
ssem
blie
s, s
eals
, gas
kets
, lo
ckin
g d
evic
es,
nuts
, bolts,
was
her
s;
lay
out
com
ponen
ts a
nd c
onsu
mab
les,
sel
ect
corr
ect
asse
mbly
tools
, se
lect
adju
stin
g c
om
pon
ents
, e.
g.
shim
s, p
acki
ng;
asse
mble
co
mponen
ts a
nd m
atin
g p
arts
, co
rrec
tly
tighte
n f
aste
nin
gs,
e.g
. tighte
nin
g s
equen
ce,
torq
ue
load
ing;
corr
ectly
fit
secu
ring/l
ock
ing
dev
ices
; in
spec
t/te
st,
e.g.
alig
nm
ent,
dim
ensi
onal
acc
ura
cy,
corr
ect
bel
t/ch
ain t
ensi
on,
dev
ice/
syst
em o
per
atin
g t
o s
pec
ific
atio
n.
3.3
D
escr
ibe
how
to
use
corr
ect
pro
cedure
s to
res
tore
a w
ork
ar
ea t
o a
rea
dy
conditio
n
□
Res
tore
work
are
a: c
orr
ect
stora
ge
of
tools
, eq
uip
men
t an
d p
erso
nal
pro
tect
ive
equip
men
t, r
emova
l an
d s
tora
ge
of unuse
d c
onsu
mab
les,
st
ora
ge
and d
isposa
l of
was
te m
ater
ials
, cl
ean d
ow
n,
sign-o
ff
docu
men
tation.
□
Rea
dy
conditio
n:
clea
n,
tidy,
rea
dy
for
nex
t jo
b.
3
Know
how
to u
se
dis
man
tlin
g a
nd
asse
mbly
te
chniq
ues
for
com
ponen
ts o
r sy
stem
s
3.4
O
utlin
e th
e in
form
atio
n t
hat
sh
ould
be
incl
uded
in r
eport
s pro
duce
d o
n c
om
ple
tion o
f m
ainte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s
□
Info
rmat
ion incl
uded
in r
eport
: ty
pe
of
mai
nte
nan
ce u
nder
take
n,
repai
rs
carr
ied o
ut,
rep
lace
d c
om
ponen
ts/a
ssem
ble
s an
d c
onsu
mab
les,
tim
e ta
ken,
serv
icea
bili
ty o
f dev
ice
or
syst
em;
advi
sory
info
rmat
ion f
or
nex
t sc
hed
ule
d s
ervi
ce,
e.g.
com
ponen
ts t
hat
are
beg
innin
g t
o s
how
sig
ns
of
wea
r or
deg
radat
ion,
com
ponen
ts t
hat
hav
e bee
n r
epla
ced o
n a
te
mpora
ry b
asis
, lif
e-det
erm
ined
com
ponen
ts t
hat
are
alm
ost
tim
e ex
pired
.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
51
Information for tutors
Delivery
All learning outcomes should be delivered through lectures, tutor demonstrations, practical activities or learner investigation. It is important to ensure that there is sufficient coverage of the learning outcomes and unit content. Relevance and interest may be added to delivery by showing learners exemplars of maintenance work being carried out on military equipment. There is no requirement for learners to perform assessed practical activities because the unit focus is on the theoretical aspects of maintenance. Learners have the opportunity to demonstrate their application and practical skills in other units within the qualification.
As learners may not have any prior knowledge of maintenance principles it is suggested that, before starting on delivery of the learning outcomes, they are given an overview presentation about why effective maintenance is important. This could include concepts about cost and inconvenience if equipment breaks down, prevention better than cure, repair or replace, etc.
All the unit content is applicable to any type of engineering context but because the unit is within a military engineering programme it is important to keep this in mind during delivery. Learners should be aware that maintenance activities take place in the field as well as in fully equipped workshops.
Learning outcome 1 starts by investigating safe working practices and health and safety requirements. As there is a large amount of information in the public domain, learners should be guided to focus their attentions on safety requirements specific to maintenance activities.
The learning outcomes follow a logical order and it would be a reasonable approach to develop them sequentially throughout the unit. In this way, the learner will understand maintenance procedures and be able to apply this knowledge to future practical situations.
The unit gives learners opportunities to work individually or in groups when carrying out research activities.
Tutors should always ensure that each learner uses the correct personal protective equipment if they are exposed to practical activities. It is important that learners take responsibility for their own safety and that of others when being shown maintenance procedures.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
There are close links between this unit and the following units in this qualification:
Unit 5: Operation and Maintenance of Fluid Power Systems and Components
Unit 6: Engineering Maintenance Procedures
Unit 7: Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Systems and Components.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
52
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Evidence of learner achievement of the assessment criteria could be collected from three assignments.
The focus of the unit is on the principles of engineering maintenance and learners should be aware from the start that assessment evidence needs to be in the form of written descriptions, presented as a portfolio. Images and diagrams can be used to support descriptive writing and it is acceptable for them to be clipped from approved sources, provided these sources are referenced. An example of unacceptable evidence is text cut and pasted from the internet.
Learning outcome 1, incorporating assessment criteria 1.1–1.7, could be covered through an assignment requiring learners to respond to pre-set questions, which could be based around a case study style scenario or could be test questions that have been set within a relevant engineering maintenance context. In either case, it is most likely that controlled conditions will be required to ensure the authenticity of the responses.
Assessment of learning outcomes 2 and 3 will be similar to that for learning outcome 1.
For assessment criteria 3.1 and 3.2, learners should be given an engineering system or device applicable to Level 2, i.e. not over complex. This could be a sub-system of something much larger, for example the wheel, bearing and brake assembly of a vehicle.
This unit links to other practical units in the programme of study and there is the opportunity, where the centre considers it appropriate, to set assignment tasks that cross over units. If this approach is adopted, it is important that portfolios include clear pointers to where evidence that addresses specific unit content and assessment criteria can be found.
Suggested resources
Books
Health and Safety Executive – Essentials of Health and Safety at Work (HSE, 2006) ISBN 9780717661794
Health and Safety Executive – Health and Safety in Engineering Workshops (HSE, 2004) ISBN 9780717617173
Kibbe R – Mechanical Systems for Industrial Maintenance (Prentice Hall, 2001) ISBN 9780130164902
Mobley K – Maintenance Fundamentals, 2nd Edition (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004) ISBN 9780750677981
Sinclair I and Lewis G – Electronic and Electrical Servicing (Newnes, 2002) ISBN 9780717661794
Website
www.hse.gov.uk – Health and Safety Executive
Other
Manufacturers’ specifications, as appropriate
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
53
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Investigating how to carry out maintenance procedures in a military engineering environment safely
Reflective learners
Reviewing progress and deciding what written evidence to put into their portfolio of evidence
Self-managers Demonstrating initiative, commitment, perseverance and time management when investigating the principles of maintenance technology
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Team workers Collaborating with others, if working in groups to gather information about safe working and maintenance procedures
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
54
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Finding and selecting information
Use appropriate search techniques to locate and select relevant information
Selecting and using sources of information when preparing a portfolio of evidence for assessment
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Listening to and speaking with tutors when investigating the principles of engineering maintenance
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Selecting, reading and using appropriate sources of information when preparing portfolio evidence
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Describing how to work safely in an engineering maintenance environment, describing how to select working methods, tools and equipment, and describing how to dismantle and assemble engineered products
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
55
Unit 4: Principles of Fabrication and Welding Technology
Unit reference number: A/506/6193
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 7
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit gives learners the opportunity to explore the basic principles of fabrication and welding so that they have an understanding of how to select, prepare and weld metals to produce joints that can be inspected and tested for defects.
Welding is a fusion technique for producing permanent joints in metal, a method that involves heat and melting. Learners will investigate the use of electric arc, electrical resistance and gas combustion to produce the necessary heat at the weld position. Learners will understand that components joined by fusion cannot be separated back into their original configurations; they will investigate how to edge prepare and align materials correctly before the weld is made. Heat distortion and the strategies for controlling it are investigated.
Learners will consider the use of filler material and shielding gases in the production of welds that are structurally sound, free from defects and have the correct profile and surface finish. Identification of weld defects using non-destructive and workshop test methods is a topic covered in the unit.
Welded joint configurations are defined by welding standards; learners will gain a basic understanding of them and the symbols that are used on engineering drawings to represent them. Learners will look at the metals commonly used in welding and how to identify them. They will use basic mathematical skills to calculate bending and rolling allowances for materials that are shaped into curves before welding.
Learners can be given the opportunity to perform welding techniques but this is not mandatory to achieving a pass for the unit.
Essential resources For this unit, centres need to provide access to a workshop environment so that fabrication and welding processes can be demonstrated. A range of equipment is required; this should include cutting tools, measuring equipment, welding equipment, consumables, materials and personal protective equipment (PPE).
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
56
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
D
escr
ibe
the
effe
cts
of
elec
tric
ity
on t
he
wel
din
g
pro
cess
□
Eff
ects
: e.
g.
supply
voltag
e, c
urr
ent
(am
per
age)
, direc
t cu
rren
t,
alte
rnat
ing c
urr
ent,
direc
tion o
f cu
rren
t, p
osi
tive
ly/n
egat
ivel
y ch
arged
an
ode,
arc
blo
w.
1.2
Id
entify
ele
ctro
de
cove
rings
□
Ele
ctro
de
cove
rings:
e.g
. ru
tile
, bas
ic,
nic
kel al
loy,
cel
lulo
sic,
cal
cium
fluoride,
iro
n p
owder
.
1.3
D
escr
ibe
the
impac
t of
diffe
rent
elec
trode
cove
rings
on t
he
wel
din
g p
roce
ss
□
Impac
t: e
.g.
pool si
ze,
wel
d p
enet
ration,
atm
ospher
ic c
onta
min
atio
n,
wel
d s
urf
ace
pro
file
/conto
ur,
eas
e of
pro
duci
ng t
he
wel
d,
final
ap
pea
rance
.
1.4
Id
entify
shie
ldin
g g
ases
and
gas
mix
ture
s
□
Shie
ldin
g g
ases
: in
ert
gas
, ac
tive
gas
; gas
es, e.
g.
argon,
hel
ium
, ca
rbon
dio
xide,
nitro
gen
, oxy
gen
, m
ixtu
res.
1.5
D
escr
ibe
the
impac
t of
diffe
rent
shie
ldin
g g
ases
and
gas
mix
ture
s on t
he
wel
din
g
pro
cess
□
Impac
t on t
he
pro
cess
: w
eldin
g p
roce
ss,
e.g.
met
al iner
t gas
(M
IG),
m
etal
act
ive
gas
(M
AG
), t
ungst
en iner
t gas
(TIG
); e
ffec
t of
the
gas
, e.
g.
wel
d s
pee
d,
wel
d s
urf
ace
finis
h,
wel
d b
ead p
rofile
, poro
sity
, pen
etra
tion,
mec
han
ical
pro
per
ties
of
the
wel
d.
1
Know
the
bas
ic
princi
ple
s of
wel
din
g m
etal
lic
mat
eria
ls
1.6
D
escr
ibe
the
impac
t of
wel
din
g f
lam
e co
nditio
ns
on
the
wel
din
g p
roce
ss
□
Flam
e co
nditio
ns:
oxy
acet
ylen
e w
eldin
g;
flam
e zo
nes
, e.
g.
inner
cone,
oute
r co
ne,
tem
per
ature
s, c
olo
ur;
fla
me
type,
e.g
. neu
tral
, re
duci
ng,
oxi
dis
ing.
2.1
D
escr
ibe
the
feat
ure
s of
w
elded
join
ts
□
Feat
ure
s: fill
et p
rofile
, e.
g.
conve
x, c
onca
ve,
mitre
; w
eld w
idth
, fu
sion
zone
(pen
etra
tion),
hea
t af
fect
ed z
one,
surf
ace
finis
h.
2.2
D
escr
ibe
the
types
of w
elded
jo
ints
confo
rmin
g t
o c
urr
ent
stan
dar
ds
□
Typ
es o
f jo
int:
butt
, te
e, c
orn
er,
lap,
edge,
wel
d s
ymbols
(BS E
N22553).
□
Typ
es o
f w
eld:
fille
t, g
roove
, ta
ck,
spot.
2
Know
how
to a
pply
w
eldin
g
term
inolo
gy
and
sym
bols
2.3
D
escr
ibe
how
to
sele
ct join
t pre
par
atio
n f
or
type
of w
eld □
Edge
pre
par
atio
n:
e.g.
flat
, sq
uar
e butt
(op
en),
squar
e butt
(cl
ose
d),
bev
el,
cham
fer,
gro
ove
, ve
e butt
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
57
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
D
escr
ibe
the
effe
cts
of
diffe
rent
hea
t so
urc
es for
wel
din
g
□
Hea
t dis
trib
ution
: w
eld m
etal
, par
ent
met
al,
stru
cture
as
a w
hole
.
3.2
D
escr
ibe
hea
t dis
trib
ution
pro
duce
d b
y w
eldin
g
pro
cess
es
□
Dis
tort
ion:
e.g.
shrinka
ge,
exp
ansi
on,
unev
en e
xpan
sion a
nd
contr
action,
bow
ing,
dis
hin
g,
twis
ting,
buck
ling.
□
Dis
tort
ion c
ontr
ol:
set
ting u
p,
e.g.
tack
wel
ds,
bac
k-to
-bac
k posi
tionin
g,
stiffe
ner
s, c
lam
ps,
jig
s, f
ixtu
res;
wel
din
g,
e.g.
dep
osi
t w
eld m
etal
as
quic
kly
as p
oss
ible
, bac
kste
p w
eld for
long r
uns,
bal
ance
wel
ds
around
neu
tral
axi
s, u
niform
hea
t dis
trib
ution.
3.3
D
escr
ibe
dis
tort
ion c
ause
d
by
wel
din
g a
nd w
ays
of
contr
olli
ng it
□
Wel
d d
efec
ts:
lack
of fu
sion,
inco
mple
te p
enet
ration,
exce
ssiv
e pen
etra
tion,
crac
ks,
poro
sity
, sl
ag incl
usi
ons,
inco
rrec
t w
eld s
hap
e an
d
size
, burn
thro
ugh.
□
Cau
ses:
inco
rrec
tly
set
wel
din
g p
aram
eter
s, e
.g.
flam
e co
nditio
n,
curr
ent
flow
, sh
ield
ing g
as f
low
, el
ectr
ode,
wel
d s
pee
d;
oper
ator
erro
r.
3.4
O
utlin
e w
eld d
efec
ts a
nd
what
cau
ses
them
□
M
ethods:
e.g
. vi
sual
, dye
pen
etra
nt,
mag
net
ic p
articl
e, x
-ray
, el
ectr
om
agnet
ic,
ultra
sonic
; bas
ic p
rinci
ple
s of
oper
atio
n;
adva
nta
ges
an
d d
isad
vanta
ges
of
each
met
hod.
3.5
D
escr
ibe
non-d
estr
uct
ive
test
(N
DT)
met
hods
that
are
use
d t
o id
entify
wel
d d
efec
ts
□
Tec
hniq
ues
: vi
sual
tes
ts,
e.g.
insp
ect
by
eye,
mac
ro-e
tch;
mec
han
ical
te
sts
e.g.
ben
d (
root/
face
), n
ick
bre
ak (
frac
ture
), im
pac
t; w
eld g
auges
, e.
g.
fille
t, leg
len
gth
, under
cut,
hi-
lo g
auges
.
3
Under
stan
d t
he
effe
cts
of w
eldin
g
3.6
D
escr
ibe
wor
kshop
tech
niq
ues
for
test
ing w
elds
□
Hea
t dis
trib
ution
: w
eld m
etal
, par
ent
met
al,
stru
cture
as
a w
hole
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
58
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.1
D
escr
ibe
met
als
use
d in
fabrica
tions
□
M
etal
s: low
car
bon s
teel
, au
sten
itic
sta
inle
ss s
teel
, gal
vanis
ed s
teel
, al
um
iniu
m,
alum
iniu
m a
lloy.
4.2
Id
entify
form
s of
supply
for
met
als
use
d in f
abrica
tions
□
Form
s of
supply
: pla
te,
thin
shee
t; b
ar,
e.g.
circ
ula
r, s
quar
e,
rect
angula
r; s
truct
ura
l se
ctio
ns,
e.g
. an
gle
, te
e, ‘I’;
hol
low
sec
tions,
e.g
. ci
rcula
r, s
quar
e, r
ecta
ngula
r.
4
Know
how
to
iden
tify
com
mon
met
als
use
d in
fabrica
tion
4.3
Sel
ect,
agai
nst
crite
ria,
m
ater
ials
for
giv
en
applic
atio
ns
□
Crite
ria:
mec
han
ical
pro
per
ties
, e.
g.
stre
ngth
, m
alle
abili
ty,
duct
ility
, har
dnes
s; p
hys
ical
pro
per
ties
, e.
g. co
rrosi
on r
esis
tance
, den
sity
; ot
her
, e.
g.
wel
dab
ility
, co
st,
surf
ace
appea
rance
.
5
Know
how
to
det
erm
ine
form
ing
allo
wan
ces
for
com
mon m
etal
s use
d in fab
rica
tion
5.1
D
eter
min
e, u
sing g
iven
dat
a, t
he
ben
din
g a
nd r
olli
ng
allo
wan
ces
for
fabrica
ted
form
s
□
Ben
din
g:
configura
tion,
e.g.
right
angle
, 45 d
egre
e, ‘U
’.
□
Cal
cula
tion
s: s
pring-b
ack
and b
end a
llow
ance
for
tube
and p
late
, ro
lling
allo
wan
ce f
or
shee
t m
ater
ial.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
59
Information for tutors
Delivery
All learning outcomes should be delivered through lectures, tutor demonstrations, practical activities or learner investigation. It is important to ensure that there is sufficient coverage of the learning outcomes and unit content. Relevance and interest may be added to delivery by showing learners examples of fabrication and welding being carried out on military equipment. There is no requirement for learners to perform assessed practical activities because the unit focus is on the theoretical aspects of delivery. Learners have the opportunity to demonstrate their practical skills in Unit 9: Application of Welding Processes.
As learners may not have any prior knowledge of fabrication and welding, it is suggested that, before starting on delivery of the learning outcomes, they are given an overview presentation about how fabrication and welding sit alongside other manufacturing processes.
All the unit content is applicable to any type of engineering context, but because the unit is in a military engineering programme it is important to keep this in mind during delivery. Learners should be aware that welding activities take place on a mobile basis in the field as well as in fully equipped workshops.
Learning outcome 1 starts by investigating the basic principles of welding and formal delivery will benefit from being supported by practical demonstration and video presentation. Care should be taken to ensure that presentations are pitched at the correct level, i.e. Level 2. It is not the intention that learners be expert welders on completion of this unit and the welding application unit.
The learning outcomes follow a logical order and it would be a reasonable approach to develop them sequentially throughout the unit. In this way, the learner will understand the basic principles of welding and be able to apply this knowledge to future practical situations.
The unit gives learners opportunities to work individually or in groups when carrying out research activities.
Tutors should always ensure that each learner has the correct personal protective equipment and that equipment is in a serviceable form when being demonstrated. It is also important that learners take responsibility for their own safety and that of others when being shown fabrication and welding procedures.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
There are close links between this unit and the following unit in this qualification:
Unit 9: Application of Welding Processes.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
60
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Evidence of learner achievement of the assessment criteria could be collected from four assignments.
The focus of the unit is on the principles of fabrication and welding technology and learners should be aware from the start that assessment evidence should be in the form of written description, presented as a portfolio. Images and diagrams can be used to support descriptive writing and it is acceptable for them to be clipped from approved sources, provided these sources are referenced. An example of unacceptable evidence is text cut and pasted from the internet.
Learning outcome 1, incorporating assessment criteria 1.1–1.6 could be covered through an assignment that requires the learner to respond to pre-set questions. These could be based around a case study style scenario or could be test questions that have been set within a relevant engineering context. In either case, it is most likely that controlled conditions will be required to ensure the authenticity of the responses.
Assessment of learning outcomes 2, 3, 4 and 5 will be similar to that of learning outcome 1.
This unit link to Unit 9: Application of Welding Processes and there is the opportunity, where the centre considers it appropriate, to set assignment tasks that cross over units. For example, for this unit weld testing is addressed by assessment criteria 3.5 and 3.6, which would link to 4.1 in Unit 9. If this approach is adopted, it is important that portfolios include clear pointers to where evidence that addresses specific unit content and assessment criteria can be found.
Suggested resources
Books
Jeffus L – Welding Principles and Applications (Delmar Learning, 2007) ISBN 9781418052751
Kenyon W – Basic Welding and Fabrication (Longman, 1987) 9780582005365
Timings R – Fabrication and Welding Engineering (Newnes, 2008) ISBN 9780750666916
Websites
www.millerwelds.com/resources/video_library – short video clips of welding procedures
www.twi.co.uk – The Welding Institute
www.youtube.com – step-by-step welding videos
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
61
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Investigating the principles of fabrication and welding technology in a military engineering environment
Reflective learners
Reviewing progress and deciding what written evidence to put into their portfolio of evidence
Self-managers Demonstrating initiative, commitment, perseverance and time management when investigating the principles of fabrication and welding technology
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Team workers Collaborating with others if working in small groups to gather information about fabrication and welding technology
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
62
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Finding and selecting information
Use appropriate search techniques to locate and select relevant information
Selecting and using sources of information when preparing a portfolio of evidence for assessment
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Listening to and speaking with tutors when investigating the principles of fabrication and welding technology
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Selecting, reading and using appropriate sources of information when preparing portfolio evidence
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Describing the basic principles and terminology of welding, describing the thermal effects of welding, describing weld defects, describing types, selection and application of materials for fabricating products
Mathematics
Representing – selecting the mathematics and information to model a situation
Calculating bending and rolling allowances from information supplied
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
63
Unit 5: Operation and Maintenance of Fluid Power Systems and Components
Unit reference number: H/600/3387
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 10
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit provides learners with a knowledge and understanding of fluid power systems, circuits, and components. Learners will also develop the skills needed to safely carry out maintenance activities on a range of pneumatic and hydraulic systems used in industry.
In every engineering workshop, processes and service operations need maintaining. The maintenance engineer is a key member of staff in ensuring the process or service continues to operate safely. This unit is about those aspects of fluid power systems and components that a maintenance engineer is likely to be involved with.
Learners will gain an understanding of fluid power diagrams, symbols, systems and their components. They will also develop an understanding of the operation of components such as pumps, reservoirs, air service units, control valves, actuators, sensors, regulators, compressors, pipes and hoses.
Learners will develop the skills needed to locate faults and carry out scheduled and corrective maintenance activities on pneumatic and hydraulic systems and components in accordance with approved procedures. In carrying out these activities learners will need to use a range of tools and fault-finding and diagnostic techniques. Learners will be able to identify and locate faults at unit, component and system level. They will then remove, replace and/or repair the faulty component and carry out tests to ensure that the system performs to specification.
Learners will gain an understanding of the procedures that must be followed before handing over maintained and/or installed equipment and confirming that the equipment is now ready to run in a safe and operable condition. They will be expected to demonstrate safe working practices when carrying out fault location and maintenance activities and the necessary safeguards to protect their own safety and that of others in the workplace.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
64
Essential resources In order to gain the relevant practical skills required for this unit it is essential that learners have access to:
● fluid power system circuits and components
● pneumatic and hydraulic system test rigs
● fluid power circuit drawings and computer simulation software
● appropriate test equipment
● data books and specifications
● current health and safety legislation and regulations and related publications.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
65
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
Id
entify
the
rele
vant
hea
lth
and s
afet
y re
gula
tions
that
nee
d t
o b
e fo
llow
ed w
hen
w
ork
ing w
ith f
luid
pow
er
syst
ems
□
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y re
gula
tions:
e.g
. H
ealth a
nd S
afet
y at
Work
Act
1974,
Contr
ol of
Subst
ance
s H
azar
dous
to H
ealth (
CO
SH
H),
Man
agem
ent
of
Hea
lth a
nd S
afet
y Reg
ula
tions,
Pre
ssure
Sys
tem
s an
d T
ransp
ort
able
Gas
Conta
iner
s Reg
ula
tions
1989 (
SI
1989 N
o 2
169),
The
Pres
sure
Ves
sels
D
irec
tive
.
1
Know
the
hea
lth
and s
afet
y re
gula
tions
and
pre
cautions
that
nee
d t
o b
e obse
rved
when
w
ork
ing w
ith f
luid
pow
er s
yste
ms
1.2
D
escr
ibe
the
safe
pra
ctic
es
that
nee
d t
o b
e fo
llow
ed
when
ass
emblin
g,
test
ing
and m
ainta
inin
g a
flu
id
pow
er s
yste
m
□
Saf
e pra
ctic
es:
pra
ctic
es t
o b
e fo
llow
ed w
hen
ass
emblin
g,
test
ing a
nd
mai
nta
inin
g p
neu
mat
ic e
quip
men
t an
d s
yste
ms,
e.g
. use
of
per
sonal
pro
tect
ive
equip
men
t, c
orr
ect
lifting a
nd h
andlin
g t
echniq
ues
, re
leas
ing
pre
ssure
fro
m s
yste
ms,
mai
nta
inin
g a
tid
y w
ork
are
a, c
orr
ect
dis
posa
l of
was
te m
ater
ials
, per
mit t
o w
ork
, is
ola
tion,
risk
ass
essm
ent,
rep
ort
ing o
f in
juries
.
2.1
Id
entify
the
sym
bols
use
d t
o
repre
sent
seve
n g
iven
flu
id
pow
er s
yste
m c
om
ponen
ts
□
Sym
bols
: pneu
mat
ic a
nd h
ydra
ulic
sym
bols
for
com
mon c
om
ponen
ts,
dev
ices
and e
quip
men
t, e
.g.
pum
ps,
cyl
inder
s, c
om
pre
ssors
, filter
s,
rece
iver
s, s
pools
, re
gula
tors
, ac
tuat
ors
, ac
cum
ula
tors
, va
lves
, bea
rings,
se
nso
rs,
filter
s.
2
Be
able
to r
ead
and inte
rpre
t fluid
pow
er s
ymbols
an
d d
iagra
ms
2.2
In
terp
ret
a fluid
pow
er
circ
uit d
iagra
m a
nd e
xpla
in
the
funct
ion o
f th
e ci
rcuit
com
ponen
ts s
how
n
□
Dia
gra
ms:
e.g
. ci
rcuit d
iagra
ms,
blo
ck d
iagra
ms,
sys
tem
lay
out
dia
gra
ms,
dis
pla
cem
ent
step
dia
gra
ms,
rel
ated
docu
men
tation
(com
ponen
t an
d e
quip
men
t dat
a sh
eets
, fu
nct
ional
char
ts,
oper
atin
g
inst
ruct
ions)
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
66
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
D
escr
ibe
the
const
ruct
ion
and o
per
atio
n o
f si
x fluid
pow
er s
yste
m c
om
ponen
ts
□
Com
pon
ents
: e.
g.
pum
ps,
direc
tional
, flow
, pre
ssure
and n
on-r
eturn
va
lves
, lin
ear
and r
ota
ry a
ctuat
ors
, hyd
raulic
and p
neu
mat
ic m
oto
rs,
hose
s/pip
ework
, fitt
ings,
sea
ls,
air
serv
ice
units.
3
Know
the
const
ruct
ion,
oper
atio
n a
nd
pra
ctic
al
applic
atio
n o
f fluid
pow
er s
yste
m
com
ponen
ts a
nd
equip
men
t
3.2
D
escr
ibe
the
const
ruct
ion,
oper
atio
n a
nd a
pplic
atio
n o
f a
type
of f
luid
pow
er
equip
men
t
□
Equip
men
t: c
onst
ruct
ion;
oper
atio
n;
applic
atio
n;
types
, e.
g.
pneu
mat
ic,
hyd
raulic
, va
cuum
.
4
Be
able
to c
arry
out
test
ing,
fault
dia
gnosi
s an
d
mai
nte
nan
ce
activi
ties
on f
luid
pow
er e
quip
men
t an
d s
yste
ms
4.1
U
se t
wo
inst
rum
ents
to
carr
y out
test
ing a
nd
mai
nte
nan
ce r
outines
on a
giv
en f
luid
pow
er s
yste
m
□
Tes
ting:
regula
tions
and c
odes
of
pra
ctic
e re
lating t
o t
he
test
ing o
f pneu
mat
ic a
nd h
ydra
ulic
equip
men
t an
d s
yste
ms;
tes
t eq
uip
men
t, e
.g.
pre
ssure
indic
ators
, flow
indic
ators
, m
easu
ring d
evic
es,
self-d
iagnost
ic
equip
men
t; p
roce
dure
s an
d t
echniq
ues
for
carr
ying o
ut
test
s.
□
Inst
rum
ents
: e.
g.
mea
suring d
evic
es,
pre
ssure
indic
ators
, flow
in
dic
ators
, se
lf-d
iagnost
ic e
quip
men
t.
□
Mai
nte
nan
ce r
outines
: re
gula
r m
ainte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s on f
luid
pow
er
com
ponen
ts,
dev
ices
and s
yste
ms,
e.g
. in
spec
tion a
nd f
unct
ional
te
stin
g,
rem
ovi
ng a
nd r
epla
cing u
nits/
com
pon
ents
, se
ttin
g,
alig
nin
g a
nd
adju
stin
g r
epla
ced c
om
ponen
ts,
rem
ovin
g a
ir lin
es a
nd h
ose
s, lea
k det
ection,
repla
cing s
eals
, filter
s, g
aske
ts,
carr
ying o
ut
adju
stm
ents
as
nec
essa
ry;
reco
rdin
g o
f co
nditio
n;
reco
mm
ended
fre
quen
cies
for
mai
nte
nan
ce;
the
use
of
mai
nte
nan
ce m
anual
s an
d d
ocu
men
tation;
the
nee
d t
o r
ecord
mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd f
inal
tes
t; h
andove
r pro
cedure
s.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
67
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.2
U
se t
wo
fault d
iagnosi
s te
chniq
ues
and t
wo
dia
gnost
ic a
ids
to iden
tify
a
fluid
pow
er s
yste
m p
roble
m
and r
eport
the
findin
gs
□
Faults:
ter
min
olo
gy
use
d,
e.g.
‘sym
pto
m’, ‘fa
ult’, ‘ca
use
’; t
ypic
al f
aults
in p
neu
mat
ic a
nd h
ydra
ulic
com
ponen
ts a
nd e
quip
men
t; s
ympto
ms
of
non-c
om
ple
x fa
ults
and t
hei
r ca
use
s.
□
Fault d
iagnosi
s te
chniq
ues
: e.
g.
visu
al e
xam
inat
ion,
unit s
ubst
itution,
input
to o
utp
ut,
insp
ection a
nd s
amplin
g,
six
poin
t (c
olle
ct t
he
evid
ence
, an
alys
e ev
iden
ce,
loca
te f
ault,
det
erm
ine
and r
emove
cau
se,
rect
ify
fault,
chec
k sy
stem
), fau
lt/r
epai
r re
port
ing;
emer
gen
t se
quen
ce.
□
Dia
gnost
ic a
ids:
e.g
. fu
nct
ional
char
ts,
dia
gra
ms,
flo
w c
har
ts,
trou
ble
-sh
ooting c
har
ts,
com
pon
ent
dat
a sh
eets
, oper
atio
n a
nd m
ainte
nan
ce
man
ual
s, s
oftw
are-
bas
ed r
ecord
s an
d d
ata.
□
Proble
m:
e.g.
inte
rmitte
nt,
par
tial
fai
lure
/out-
of-
spec
ific
atio
n o
utp
ut,
co
mple
te b
reak
dow
ns.
□
Rep
ort
fin
din
gs:
e.g
. sc
hed
ule
d m
ainte
nan
ce r
eport
, co
rrec
tive
m
ainte
nan
ce r
eport
, oth
er c
om
pan
y-sp
ecific
rep
ort
s, job c
ards,
m
ainte
nan
ce log.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
68
Information for tutors
Delivery
This unit should be delivered using lectures, tutor demonstrations and practical engineering activities. During the delivery of the unit, centres must ensure sufficient coverage of the learning outcomes and content. Learning outcomes 2 and 3 are best suited to a practical approach, although learners will at first need a broad overview of different pneumatic and hydraulic diagrams, systems and components to enable correct selection and application of maintenance, diagnostic and testing techniques. A good knowledge and understanding of the circuits and components prior to diagnosing faults or maintaining systems is essential.
Learners must be made aware of, and have access to, relevant UK health and safety legislation and know the importance of the use of appropriate risk assessment. Tutors should ensure that each learner has the correct PPE and that the system is safe for operation. It is also important that learners work in a safe manner when using equipment or working on fluid power systems.
The unit should be delivered by focusing on developing learners’ diagnostic and practical skills together with an understanding of pneumatic systems maintenance, construction and operation.
The delivery approach will be determined through an analysis of learners’ needs and, in particular, through consideration of the range of industries that the centres are working with or preparing their learners for. However, it is expected that learners’ experience should be sufficiently varied to provide them with the underpinning knowledge and skills needed to apply fault-finding techniques and repair and maintain pneumatic systems in most industrial settings. It would not be appropriate for this unit to be taught without any practical application, as the use of theory lessons and simulation exercises does not have the same value that real practical experience in a working environment can bring.
The learning outcomes are ordered logically and it would be reasonable to develop them sequentially throughout the unit. In this way, the learner will be able to apply health and safety precautions and knowledge of circuit diagrams and components before attempting to locate faults and maintain systems. For example, a short introduction to a component (or a range of components), the function of the component within the larger system, the tools necessary to carry out the maintenance task and their limits with any safety considerations – followed by practise.
Centres are encouraged to find innovative ways of bringing the unit to life for the learner and giving it true relevance. This will generally be achieved through the use of practical ‘hands-on’ experiences for the learner, which can be achieved in a learning environment or through actual work place experience. The learners could be provided with access to workshops and the necessary tools, materials and equipment to carry out practical exercises on fault finding, repair and maintenance of fluid power systems. Learners can also be given a range of system and component faults on which to practice their skills.
Each task should be designed so that it requires the learners to prepare the work environment, prepare for the activity and then complete the work activity. The opportunity to work with individuals during the delivery of this practical work can be used to good effect to underpin learning. In particular, it can be used to reinforce working practices/skills, help them to deal with problems affecting the engineering processes being experienced or to support them when they need to work with others more effectively in order to achieve the task.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
69
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Much of the assessment evidence for this unit could come from practical activities. These can be carried out solely for the purpose of this unit but, equally, could be the activities associated with other units or from work-based evidence.
Learning outcomes 1, 2 and 3 are probably best assessed through the use of written assignments. Learning outcome 4 is likely to be combination of both written assignments and practical exercises, supported by tutor observation reports and learners’ portfolio work logs and other documentation.
Four assignments could be used for the assessment of this unit. The first, relating to learning outcome 1, would cover 1.1 and 1.2. This could be a written assignment that asks for a description of the relevant health and safety regulations and safe working practices that need to be followed when working with fluid power systems. Evidence could be in the form of a written report, or alternatively an information leaflet or poster.
A second written assignment could be used to cover 2.1 and 2.2, based on a given list of components and a fluid power circuit containing a minimum of six different components. Learners would first need to identify the symbols used to represent seven different fluid power components. They would then need to identify and describe the function of six fluid power components from the diagram.
The third assignment will require learners to provide a description of the construction and operation of fluid power components and a type of equipment (pneumatic, hydraulic or vacuum).
The fourth assignment should be based on practical testing and fault diagnosis on a fluid power system. Assessment evidence is therefore likely to be in the form of witness statements and annotated photographs along with the learner’s report/log of the work carried out.
Suggested resources
Books
Health and Safety Executive – Essentials of Health and Safety at Work (Health and Safety Executive, 2006) ISBN 9780717661794
Timings R L – Basic Manufacturing (Newnes, 2004) ISBN 9780750659901
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
70
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Analysing and evaluating information relating to health and safety regulations, judging its relevance to working with fluid power systems
Self-managers Anticipating, taking and managing risks when carrying out fault location, testing, and maintenance activities on pneumatic equipment and systems in a safe and approved manner
Working towards an engineering maintenance activity showing initiative, commitment and perseverance
Organising time, resource and prioritising actions to prepare for and carry out an engineering maintenance activity
Team workers Collaborating with others when identifying faults and maintaining pneumatic systems
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Reflective learners
Reviewing progress during practical activities and acting on the outcomes
Creative thinkers
Questioning their own and others’ ideas during group work activities on the assessment when identifying faults and maintaining pneumatic systems
Effective participators
Identifying improvements that benefit others as well as themselves when identifying faults and maintaining pneumatic systems
Discussing issues of concern with respect to the relevant health and safety precautions/legislation relevant to fault diagnosis and maintenance of pneumatic systems
Seeking resolution with colleagues/tutor where needed
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
71
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Use ICT systems
Select, interact with and use ICT systems independently for a complex task to meet a variety of needs
Using software-based systems for circuit simulation construction and fault diagnosis
Manage information storage to enable efficient retrieval
Using software-based data systems when diagnosing faults
ICT – Develop, present and communicate information
Present information in ways that are fit for purpose and audience
Using software-based systems when handing over and commissioning system
English
Speaking and listening – make a range of contributions to discussions and make effective presentations in a wide range of contexts
Speaking and listening to colleagues and others when carrying out fault location, testing, and maintenance activities on pneumatic equipment and systems
Reading – compare, select, read and understand texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Reading current safety legislation to select the information required enabling the learners to complete tasks safely
Reading information to enable learners to prepare for and carry out fault diagnosis, location, testing, and maintenance activities on pneumatic equipment and systems in a safe and approved manner
Writing – write documents, including extended writing pieces, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Explaining the importance of applying safe working practices when carrying out maintenance on a fluid power system
Writing a report analysing the system for ease of maintenance, comparing and contrasting the diagnostic techniques used to locate faults and identifying how a work activity can be improved.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
72
Unit 6: Engineering Maintenance Procedures
Unit reference number: D/600/0388
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 5
Guided learning hours: 30
Unit aim This unit gives learners the opportunity to explore the purpose, procedures and resources required to carry out maintenance activities on non-complex engineering systems.
Engineering maintenance involves the service, repair and adjustment of engineering plant, equipment and machinery in order to ensure that it continues to perform its intended function. In recent years, maintenance needs have changed due to advances in manufacturing systems and increasing sophistication of industrial equipment and computer technology. It is therefore vital for modern manufacturing organisations to have effective maintenance planning and procedures in place to guarantee the reliable and safe operation of plant and equipment.
This unit introduces learners to the features of engineering systems that determine their reliability, safety and maintainability. The unit gives learners an understanding of the fundamentals of engineering system maintenance procedures and planning.
Learners will understand the causes and effects of equipment failure and know how planned maintenance can minimise or eliminate downtime due to failure. Learners will develop knowledge and understanding of engineering maintenance methods and procedures, and develop the skills needed to plan and carry out maintenance activities on engineering systems.
Learners will be expected to carry out maintenance procedures and planning activities on a non-complex engineering system and complete the necessary documentation before handing over and confirming that the system is now ready to run in a safe and operable condition.
Essential resources Learners need access to a workshop environment and a wide range of equipment, systems, devices and components required to carry out engineering maintenance activities, together with relevant manufacturers’ service manuals, data sheets, parts lists, diagrams and drawings. Relevant test instruments, tools and safety equipment will also be required as appropriate to the equipment, systems, devices and components used.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
73
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
D
escr
ibe
four
diffe
rent
cause
s of
engin
eering
equip
men
t fa
ilure
□
Cau
ses
of
equip
men
t fa
ilure
: e.
g.
age,
wea
r, v
ibra
tion,
corr
osi
on,
foulin
g,
envi
ronm
ent,
lac
k of m
ainte
nan
ce.
1.2
D
escr
ibe
the
effe
ct o
f ea
ch
of
the
four
failu
res
□
Eff
ects
: e.
g.
import
ance
of
dow
ntim
e, incr
ease
d c
ost
, eq
uip
men
t/co
mponen
t lif
e.
1.3
D
escr
ibe
a pla
nned
typ
e of
mai
nte
nan
ce p
roce
dure
□
Pla
nned
mai
nte
nan
ce:
e.g.
routine
mai
nte
nan
ce,
pre
venta
tive
m
ainte
nan
ce,
conditio
n m
onitoring,
front-
line
mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd
when
/wher
e th
ey a
re u
sed,
serv
icin
g.
1.4
D
escr
ibe
an u
npla
nned
typ
e of
mai
nte
nan
ce p
roce
dure
□
U
npla
nned
mai
nte
nan
ce:
e.g.
bre
akdow
n,
front-
line
mai
nte
nan
ce a
nd
when
/wher
e th
ey a
re u
sed,
repai
r, e
quip
men
t fa
ilure
, ru
n t
o f
ailu
re.
1
Know
about
engin
eering
mai
nte
nan
ce
purp
ose
s,
pro
cedure
s an
d
reso
urc
es
1.5
D
escr
ibe
the
reso
urc
es
nee
ded
for
engin
eering
mai
nte
nan
ce o
per
atio
ns
□
Res
ourc
es o
f m
ainte
nan
ce o
per
atio
ns:
hum
an (
role
s an
d
resp
onsi
bili
ties
), e
.g.
man
ager
s, m
ainte
nan
ce p
erso
nnel
, oper
ators
; to
ols
, m
ater
ials
and e
quip
men
t – f
or s
pec
ific
mai
nte
nan
ce funct
ions,
e.
g.
bas
ic t
est
inst
rum
ents
, han
d t
ools
, re
pla
cem
ent
par
ts,
clea
nin
g a
nd
lubrica
ting m
ater
ials
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
74
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
Id
entify
the
reso
urc
es
required
for
a giv
en
mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
ity
□
Mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
ity:
mai
nte
nan
ce u
nder
take
n f
or
spec
ific
par
ts o
f an
en
gin
eering s
yste
m,
e.g.
pum
p,
valv
e, c
om
pre
ssor,
hea
ting,
lighting,
fluid
pow
er,
man
ufa
cturing o
r te
st e
quip
men
t.
□
Iden
tifica
tion
of
reso
urc
es:
avai
labili
ty o
f m
ainte
nan
ce a
nd p
roduct
ion
staf
f; a
ppro
priat
e docu
men
tation,
e.g.
per
mit t
o w
ork
, m
ainte
nan
ce
chec
k lis
ts,
pro
duct
ion s
ched
ule
s, m
achin
e/pro
cess
rec
ord
s, h
andove
r docu
men
ts,
equip
men
t m
anual
s; f
ault-f
indin
g a
ids;
appro
priat
e sp
ares
/mat
eria
ls/c
onsu
mab
les;
appro
priat
e te
st e
quip
men
t an
d t
ools
.
2.2
U
se m
ainte
nan
ce
docu
men
tation t
o p
lan a
giv
en m
ainte
nan
ce a
ctiv
ity
on a
n e
ngin
eering s
yste
m
□
Mai
nte
nan
ce p
lannin
g:
freq
uen
cy o
f m
ainte
nan
ce;
reas
ons
for
sele
ctin
g
diffe
rent
freq
uen
cy r
ates
for
spec
ific
mai
nte
nan
ce,
e.g.
on
shift/
dai
ly/w
eekl
y/m
onth
ly/y
early
routines
; id
entifica
tion o
f pla
nned
re
pai
rs/r
epla
cem
ents
; hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y is
sues
; en
viro
nm
enta
l is
sues
; es
tim
atio
n o
f co
sts.
2
Be
able
to p
lan
and c
arry
out
a m
ainte
nan
ce
activi
ty o
n a
non-
com
ple
x en
gin
eering
syst
em
2.3
U
se d
ocu
men
tation t
o c
arry
out
a m
ainte
nan
ce a
ctiv
ity
□
Mai
nte
nan
ce d
ocu
men
tation:
info
rmat
ion,
e.g.
man
ufa
cture
rs’ m
anual
s,
dra
win
gs,
char
ts a
nd d
iagra
ms,
pla
nnin
g s
hee
ts,
inst
ruct
ions,
sch
edule
s;
reco
rdin
g,
e.g.
mai
nte
nan
ce logs,
oth
er r
ecord
s; h
andove
r docu
men
ts;
fault-f
indin
g a
ids.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
75
Information for tutors
Delivery
Since most learners are unlikely to have had prior experience in this area of work, it is essential to have some formal introduction to the content. The unit can then be regarded as essentially investigative; the use of non-complex rigs would allow learners to carry out a practical investigation.
The approach will be determined best through an analysis of each learner’s needs and, in particular, through consideration of the range of industries that centres are working with or preparing their learners for. Whichever approach is taken, the learner’s experience should be sufficiently varied to provide them with knowledge and understanding of engineering system maintenance procedures and planning in most industrial settings.
This unit is a mix of theoretical and practical aspects and learners should have the opportunity to examine a range of mechanical, electrical and manufacturing systems. The unit is best delivered through a programme of lectures followed by some form of practical investigations or activities.
The unit provides an opportunity for learners to work individually or in groups when planning engineering system maintenance procedures.
The learning outcomes are ordered logically and it would be a reasonable approach to develop them sequentially throughout the unit. In this way, the learner will understand maintenance methods and procedures and then be able to carry out a maintenance planning activity.
Tutors should always ensure that each learner has the correct personal protective equipment and that systems are safe for inspection and operation. It is also important that learners work in a safe manner when using equipment or working on systems.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Learning outcome 1 and the associated criteria (1.1–1.5) could be covered through an assignment that requires the learner to respond to preset questions. These questions may be based around a case study style scenario or test questions that have each been set within a relevant engineering context. In either case, it is most likely that controlled condition will be required to ensure the authenticity of the responses.
Learning outcome 2 and its associated criteria (2.1–2.3) could be assessed using a practical assignment that requires the learners to identify the resources required for a given maintenance activity and use maintenance documentation to plan for and carry out a given maintenance activity on an engineering system. The engineering system should be a non-complex system, for example pumps, valves, compressors, heating, lighting, fluid power and manufacturing or test equipment. Tutor observation will be necessary during the activity to capture the process evidence of maintenance documentation use and the safe use of correct procedures. The learners will also be required to produce a report that includes the identification of resources and all handover documentation and completed records.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
76
An alternative approach to assessment could be to require the learners to build a portfolio of evidence for the unit as a whole as they carry out a range of investigations and operations in the workplace.
A further alternative method could be the use of an integrative assignment, which links this unit with other practical units in a programme of study. If this approach is adopted, the evidence for the specific learning outcomes and associated assessment criteria will need to be clearly identified.
Suggested resources
Books
Kibbe R – Mechanical Systems for Industrial Maintenance (Prentice Hall, 2001) ISBN 9780130164902
Mobley K – Maintenance Fundamentals, 2nd Edition (Butterworth-Heinemann, 2004) ISBN 9780750677981
Other
Engineering data handbooks and manufacturers’ specifications
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
77
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Exploring a given maintenance activity from different perspectives to identify the resources required
Reflective learners
Reviewing progress with the maintenance activity on an engineering system, acting on outcomes
Self-managers Working towards a successful maintenance activity on an engineering system
Showing initiative, commitment and perseverance
Organising time and resources, prioritising actions when carrying out a maintenance activity on an engineering system
Effective participators
Identifying improvements when planning and carrying out a maintenance activity that would benefit themselves and others
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Reflective learners
Evaluating experiences during workshop activities to inform future progress with maintenance tasks
Team workers Collaborating with others when working in groups to gather information on engineering maintenance and maintenance planning
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
78
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Finding and selecting information
Select information from a variety of sources to meet requirements of a complex task
Selecting and using the sources of information required to carry out a maintenance activity independently
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Speaking and listening to operators/supervisors when planning for and carrying out maintenance activities on engineering systems
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Comparing, selecting, reading and understanding resource material when preparing for a given maintenance activity
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Writing documents to describe causes of engineering equipment failure and explaining effect of failure
Writing documents to describe planned and unplanned maintenance procedures
Writing reports to document the maintenance procedures carried out on an engineering system
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
79
Unit 7: Operation and Maintenance of Electrical Systems and Components
Unit reference number: F/600/0402
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 10
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit will develop learners’ knowledge of the function, operation and maintenance of a variety of electronic systems and system components.
Electrical engineering equipment, systems, processes and service operations, all need to be maintained to ensure continued serviceability and fitness for purpose. This unit has been designed to ensure that learners have the knowledge and skills necessary to undertake such maintenance in a safe and efficient manner.
Learners will gain knowledge of the safety precautions required for personal protection, the protection of others and the safe handling of the equipment and systems they will find in an electrical engineering environment.
Learners will be introduced to the function and operation of a variety of electrical systems and system components and will be expected to carry out maintenance on them. In particular, learners will carry out activities that develop their skills and knowledge in fault-finding, routine maintenance, dismantling and assembly of a variety of electrical systems.
Learners will be expected to obtain all necessary information, documentation, tools and equipment, prior to carrying out any given maintenance activity. They will also need to demonstrate that they can select, follow and correctly interpret maintenance procedures, safe working practices, and health and safety requirements when carrying out routine maintenance activities.
Essential resources Learners will require access to an electrical engineering workshop and relevant tools and equipment. In particular learners should have access to:
● a wide range of industry standard electrical circuits, equipment and systems and their associated components and consumables
● appropriate fault-finding instruments, safety equipment and tools
● manufacturers’ data books and specifications
● maintenance manuals, parts catalogues and/or databases, flow charts, electrical circuit and system diagrams
● British/International Standards, health and safety publications and local workshop safety documentation and procedures.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
80
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1
Know
the
work
pla
ce h
azar
ds
and h
ealth a
nd
safe
ty
requirem
ents
as
soci
ated
with
elec
tric
al
mai
nte
nan
ce
oper
atio
ns
1.1
D
escr
ibe
the
work
pla
ce
haz
ards
and h
ealth a
nd
safe
ty r
equirem
ents
rel
evan
t to
a g
iven
ele
ctrica
l m
ainte
nan
ce a
ctiv
ity
□
Work
pla
ce h
azar
ds:
e.g
. flam
mab
le s
ubst
ance
s, p
ress
urise
d s
yste
ms,
hot
surf
aces
, el
ectr
ical
equip
men
t, e
lect
rost
atic
haz
ards,
unfe
nce
d
mac
hin
ery,
toxi
c su
bst
ance
s an
d fum
es,
falli
ng o
bje
cts,
liq
uid
spill
age,
untidy
work
are
a, b
adly
mai
nta
ined
tools
and e
quip
men
t.
□
Hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y re
quirem
ents
: per
sonal
saf
ety,
e.g
. ap
pro
priat
e dre
ss,
pro
tect
ive
cloth
ing,
appro
priat
e or
pro
tect
ive
hea
dgea
r, p
rote
ctiv
e glo
ves
and f
ootw
ear,
eye
pro
tect
ion,
face
mas
ks a
nd r
espirat
ors
, el
ectr
ical
tes
ting s
afet
y; p
erso
nal
hea
lth,
e.g.
appro
priat
e use
of
bar
rier
cr
eam
s, p
erso
nal
cle
anlin
ess,
consu
mption o
f fo
od,
pro
mpt
atte
ntion t
o
inju
ries
; pro
cedure
s, e
.g.
trea
tmen
t fo
r el
ectr
ic s
hock
, re
sponse
to
alar
ms,
use
of
safe
ty e
quip
men
t, r
eport
ing o
f ac
ciden
ts,
report
ing o
f haz
ardous
item
s of
pla
nt
or
equip
men
t; s
afe
work
ing p
ract
ices
, e.
g.
per
mit t
o w
ork
, use
of dan
ger
tag
s, w
arnin
g n
otice
s, s
afet
y bar
rier
s,
cones
and t
apes
, is
ola
tion o
f eq
uip
men
t, p
roof
mar
king,
reco
rdin
g o
f m
ainte
nan
ce o
per
atio
ns.
2.1
D
escr
ibe
with t
he
aid o
f blo
ck d
iagra
ms,
the
oper
atio
n o
f a
giv
en
elec
tric
al s
yste
m
□
Ele
ctrica
l sy
stem
s: b
lock
dia
gra
m r
epre
senta
tion;
equip
men
t, e
.g.
switch
gea
r an
d d
istr
ibution p
anel
s, e
lect
rica
l pla
nt,
wirin
g e
ncl
osu
res,
port
able
applia
nce
s, m
oto
rs a
nd s
tart
ers,
lum
inar
ies,
contr
ol sy
stem
s,
smal
l fa
ns,
pum
ps,
com
pre
ssors
, al
arm
and s
afet
y sy
stem
s.
2
Know
the
oper
atio
n o
f el
ectr
ical
sys
tem
s an
d c
ircu
its
2.2
D
escr
ibe
with t
he
aid o
f dia
gra
ms
the
oper
atio
n o
f a
giv
en e
lect
rica
l ci
rcuit
□
Ele
ctrica
l ci
rcuits:
wirin
g d
iagra
m r
epre
senta
tion;
circ
uit,
e.g.
single
phas
e pow
er,
single
phas
e lig
hting,
thre
e phas
e pow
er,
direc
t cu
rren
t pow
er.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
81
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
31.
Use
man
ufa
cture
rs’
dat
abas
es o
r par
ts
cata
logues
to s
elec
t fo
ur
elec
tric
al s
yste
m
com
ponen
ts
□
Sys
tem
com
ponen
ts:
elec
tric
al s
upply
, e.
g.
cable
s an
d c
onnec
tors
, bat
teries
, tr
ansf
orm
ers,
rec
tifier
s, c
onta
ctors
; ci
rcuit c
om
ponen
ts,
e.g.
capac
itors
, ci
rcuit b
oar
ds,
sw
itch
es,
sole
noid
s, t
her
mis
tors
, th
erm
oco
uple
s; d
evic
es,
e.g.
ove
rloa
d p
rote
ctio
n d
evic
e, inve
rter
and
serv
o c
ontr
olle
rs,
rela
ys,
senso
rs, en
coder
s, r
esolv
ers,
lock
ing a
nd
reta
inin
g d
evic
es,
lighting fix
ture
s; u
se o
f m
aker
’s c
atal
ogue
or
dat
abas
e fo
r se
lect
ing r
epla
cem
ents
.
3
Under
stan
d t
he
sele
ctio
n,
funct
ion
and o
per
atio
n o
f el
ectr
ical
sys
tem
co
mponen
ts
3.2
Exp
lain
the
funct
ion a
nd
oper
atio
n o
f si
x el
ectr
ical
sy
stem
com
ponen
ts
□
Funct
ion a
nd o
per
atio
n o
f si
x el
ectr
ical
sys
tem
com
ponen
ts a
s des
crib
ed
above
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
82
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.1
U
se f
our
fault-f
indin
g
aids/
tech
niq
ues
to
iden
tify
th
e pro
ble
m in a
n e
lect
rica
l sy
stem
and r
eport
fin
din
gs
□
Faults,
aid
s, t
echniq
ues
and d
ocu
men
tation:
faults,
e.g
. in
term
itte
nt
oper
atio
n,
par
tial
fai
lure
/out-
of-
spec
ific
atio
n o
utp
ut,
com
ple
te
bre
akdow
ns;
aid
s, e
.g.
funct
ional
char
ts,
dia
gra
ms,
tro
uble
-shooting
char
ts,
inst
rum
ents
(su
ch a
s m
ultim
eter
, in
sula
tion r
esis
tance
tes
ter,
lig
ht
met
er,
port
able
applia
nce
tes
ter,
ear
th loop im
ped
ance
tes
ter)
, co
mponen
t dat
a sh
eets
, so
ftw
are-
bas
ed r
ecord
s an
d d
ata;
tec
hniq
ues
, e.
g.
six
poin
t (c
olle
ct t
he
evid
ence
, an
alys
e ev
iden
ce,
loca
te f
ault,
det
erm
ine
and r
emove
cau
se,
rect
ify
fault,
chec
k sy
stem
), h
alf
split
, in
put/
outp
ut,
unit s
ubst
itution,
emer
gen
t se
quen
ce,
visu
al e
xam
inat
ion,
unit s
ubst
itution;
docu
men
tation,
e.g.
oper
atio
n a
nd m
ainte
nan
ce
man
ual
s, f
ault/r
epai
r re
port
s, fin
al t
est
han
dove
r pro
cedure
s.
4.2
U
se t
he
appro
priat
e ai
ds
and
tools
to d
ism
antle
and
reas
sem
ble
an e
lect
rica
l sy
stem
, re
pla
ce a
ny
iden
tified
fau
lty
com
pon
ents
an
d c
hec
k th
e sy
stem
for
serv
icea
bili
ty
□
Dis
man
tlin
g a
nd a
ssem
bly
: ai
ds,
e.g
. use
of
man
ufa
cture
rs’ se
rvic
e m
anual
s, p
arts
lis
ts a
nd d
raw
ings,
appro
ved w
ork
ing p
roce
dure
s, s
par
e par
ts c
atal
ogues
, m
ainte
nan
ce m
anual
s; s
yste
ms/
equip
men
t, e
.g.
switch
gea
r/dis
trib
ution p
anel
s, e
lect
rica
l pla
nt,
wirin
g e
ncl
osu
res,
port
able
applia
nce
s, m
oto
rs a
nd s
tart
ers,
lum
inar
ies,
contr
ol sy
stem
s,
fans,
pum
ps,
com
pre
ssors
, al
arm
and s
afet
y sy
stem
s.
□
Com
pon
ent/
equip
men
t re
mova
l an
d r
epla
cem
ent:
com
pon
ents
, e.
g.
dam
aged
wires
and c
able
s, e
lect
rica
l units/
com
ponen
ts,
term
inat
ion a
nd
connec
tion,
sold
erin
g a
nd d
e-so
lder
ing;
use
of ap
pro
priat
e to
ols
, eq
uip
men
t an
d d
ocu
men
tation,
e.g.
sold
er,
sold
erin
g iro
ns,
crim
pin
g
plie
rs,
han
d t
ools
, re
pla
cem
ent
par
ts,
appro
ved w
ork
ing p
roce
dure
s an
d
spar
e par
ts c
atal
ogues
.
4
Be
able
to f
ault-
find a
nd c
arry
out
routine
mai
nte
nan
ce
activi
ties
on
elec
tric
al
com
ponen
ts a
nd
syst
ems
4.3
Car
ry o
ut
routine
mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s on a
n
elec
tric
al c
om
ponen
t or
syst
em,
usi
ng t
he
corr
ect
docu
men
tation,
and r
ecord
ac
tions
□
Routine
mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s an
d d
ocu
men
tation:
insp
ection,
chec
ks
and t
ests
, e.
g.
as w
ear,
chaf
ing,
foulin
g,
secu
rity
of
atta
chm
ent,
mis
sing
or
loose
fittings,
adju
stm
ents
, re
pla
cem
ents
; re
port
s an
d
docu
men
tation,
e.g.
BS,
ISO
and/o
r BSEN
sta
ndar
ds,
sch
edule
d
mai
nte
nan
ce r
eport
, co
rrec
tive
mai
nte
nan
ce r
eport
, oth
er c
om
pan
y-sp
ecific
rep
ort
, jo
b c
ards,
mai
nte
nan
ce log,
reco
rdin
g o
f co
nditio
n,
use
of
mai
nte
nan
ce m
anual
s an
d p
arts
cat
alogues
.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
83
Information for tutors
Delivery
This unit can be delivered as a stand-alone package or integrated with other units in the qualification such as those outlined below.
This unit is essentially practical and learners should have the opportunity to dismantle, examine and reassemble a range of electrical components, equipment and systems. Ideally the learning outcomes should be achieved through investigation and participation in practical activities. Thus the unit is best delivered through a programme of lectures, demonstrations and practical work.
The approach used will be determined through an analysis of learners’ needs and through consideration of the range of industries that the centre is working with or preparing their learners for. Whichever approach is taken should provide learners with the underpinning knowledge and skills required to repair, replace and generally maintain electrical components, equipment and systems in most industrial settings.
Learners must be made aware of, and have access to, relevant UK health and safety legislation and know the importance of the use of risk assessment appropriate to the maintenance techniques they are using. Tutors should always ensure that each learner has the correct personal protective equipment and that the system is safe for operation. It is also important that learners work in a safe manner when using equipment or working on electrical circuits and systems.
The unit provides an opportunity for learners to work in teams or groups when diagnosing component or system faults. The delivery of this unit should focus on learners developing diagnostic and practical skills together with an understanding of electrical components, equipment and systems maintenance.
The four learning outcomes are ordered logically and it would be reasonable to deliver them sequentially throughout the unit.
All the learning outcomes can be delivered using a practical approach rather than spending too much time in theory lessons. For example, a short introduction to a component (or range of components), the function of the component within the larger equipment or system, the tools necessary to carry out the maintenance task together with any safety considerations, followed by practise. Learners need a broad overview of the different electrical components and systems to enable correct selection and application of maintenance, fault-finding and testing techniques.
Learning outcome 4 has a high reliance on understanding developed from the other three learning outcomes. As such, teaching and learning needs also to focus on the development of this knowledge in order that it may be applied to learning outcome 4. The use of demonstrations to introduce fault-finding, dismantling and assembly techniques, would be a beneficial method of delivery for the learner, prior to them carrying out their practise practical activities and assessments.
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Evidence of achieving the learning outcomes may be collected from well-planned investigative assignments or reports of practical workshop activities. It may be accumulated by learners building a portfolio from their investigations, maintenance activities in the workplace or by a tutor-led series of assignments, realistic maintenance exercises and tests.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
84
Evidence of achievement for learning outcome 1 could come from a written assignment, requiring learners to describe the hazards and safe working practices related to an electrical maintenance activity.
Learning outcomes 2 and 3 are linked, so might best be assessed using one combined assessment instrument. A written assignment (completed in a workshop environment) could be used, where learners provide evidence for 2.1 by sketching a block diagram of a required system, showing the interconnection of its major components. Then for 2.2, learners use a given simple circuit diagram and again describe its operation. A parts catalogue or access to a suitable database would be needed in order that learners can select four electrical system components (3.1). In order to satisfy 3.2 learners will need to describe the function and operation of six electrical system components/devices. These should be selected by tutors based on the specialist needs of the learner.
Learning outcome 4 is best assessed through one or more investigative practical-based activities carried out in an electrical workshop environment or at the learner’s workplace. A multi-stage practical/theoretical assignment could be set to cover the related criteria (4.1 and 4.2), where learners are first required to identify the problem/fault on a given electrical system using four fault-finding aids/techniques and report their findings. Evidence is likely to come from the learner’s report and the results of observation at the time the activity takes place. For 4.2, learners need to dismantle the system, replace the component/ part identified as causing the problem, reassemble the system and carry out a simple test/check to ascertain serviceability. Assessment evidence can be obtained from the results of tutor observations and by determining whether or not the learner returns the system to a serviceable condition.
Learners are required to undertake and successfully complete a routine maintenance activity in order to meet 4.3. The learner’s ability to use the correct documentation and accurately record their actions, as well as perform the practical aspects of the given maintenance, should be taken into account when tutor observation evidence, is obtained. This final assignment should be focused on the learner’s particular field of electrical maintenance and the routine maintenance activities applicable to their electrical systems, circuits or equipment.
The learner’s knowledge of and compliance with all related safety issues, also needs to be assessed during the time that all the above practical assignment activities are being carried out.
Suggested resources
Books
Adams J – Electrical Safety: A Guide to the Causes and Prevention of Electrical Hazards (Institution of Electrical Engineers, 1994) ISBN 9780852968062
Gates E – Introduction to Electronics (Delmar, 2006) ISBN 9781401889005
Health and Safety Executive – Essentials of Health and Safety at Work (HSE, 2006) ISBN 9780717661794
Sinclair I and Lewis G – Electronic and Electrical Servicing (Newnes, 2002) ISBN 9780717661794
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
85
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Analysing and evaluating information in manufacturers’ databases, evaluating its relevance and value
Identifying questions to answer and problems to resolve when using a variety of fault-finding techniques to identify the problem
Self-managers Organising time and resources when dismantling, inspecting and reassembling an electrical system
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Using the appropriate instruments, aids and tools to dismantle, inspect and reassemble, an electrical equipment or system
Replacing identified faulty components/devices and testing the system for serviceability, following safety and servicing procedures
Creative thinkers
Analysing a given electrical equipment or system for ease of maintenance
Effective participators
Carrying out a risk assessment investigation of an electrical work area and reporting their findings
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
86
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
ICT – Using ICT
Manage information storage to enable efficient retrieval
Using manufacturers’ databases and/or parts catalogues to identify and select electrical components/devices
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Describing the workplace hazards and health and safety requirements relevant to given electrical maintenance activities
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Researching and investigating the function and operation of electrical systems and components
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Describing the workplace hazards and health and safety requirements relevant to given electrical maintenance activities
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
87
Unit 8: Using Bench Fitting Techniques
Unit reference number: F/506/6194
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 7
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit gives learners knowledge and understanding of bench fitting techniques, especially when applied to a maintenance activity. Learners will also develop the skills needed to carry out bench fitting techniques safely in order to produce components.
Maintenance activities are required in every engineering workshop. Those undertaking maintenance activities are likely to need skills in making replacement parts for parts that may no longer be available. This unit gives learners the opportunity to experience this scenario.
Learners will gain understanding of relevant health and safety considerations, along with hazards associated with bench fitting activities. They will develop skills in extracting information from engineering drawings to enable successful bench fitting activities. Learners will develop skills in checking portable machines and equipment, such as angle grinders, for safe condition and operation. They will learn the importance of, and demonstrate, restoring a work area and disposing of waste materials in a recognised manner.
Essential resources For this unit, learners need access to a workshop fully equipped with a range of bench fitting equipment, including that used for measurement and marking out. A range of workpiece materials, components and drawings will be required to enable learners to gain the range of experience and coverage expected. Access to portable machines and equipment such as angle grinders is required.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
88
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.1
Exp
lain
how
to u
se s
afe
work
ing p
ract
ices
and
pro
cedure
s fo
r m
ainte
nan
ce
activi
ties
□
Saf
e w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
: w
earing a
ppro
priat
e pro
tect
ive
cloth
ing a
nd
equip
men
t, e
.g.
ove
ralls
, sa
fety
foo
twea
r, e
ye p
rote
ctio
n,
hea
ring
pro
tect
ion,
use
of
bar
rier
cre
am.
□
Proce
dure
s: m
ainta
inin
g a
cle
an a
nd t
idy
work
are
a; p
repar
ing t
he
work
ar
ea;
leav
ing t
he
work
are
a in
a s
afe
and c
lean
conditio
n;
risk
as
sess
men
ts.
□
Mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s: m
ainte
nan
ce u
nder
take
n f
or s
pec
ific
par
ts o
f an
en
gin
eering s
yste
m,
e.g.
pum
p,
valv
e, c
om
pre
ssor,
hea
ting,
fluid
pow
er,
man
ufa
cturing o
r te
st e
quip
men
t.
1.2
D
escr
ibe
the
haz
ards
asso
ciat
ed w
ith b
ench
fitting
activi
ties
□
Haz
ards:
e.g
. han
dlin
g o
f co
ola
nts
and c
utt
ing o
ils/c
om
pounds,
mis
use
of
tools
, use
of
dam
aged
or
bad
ly m
ainta
ined
tools
, st
ora
ge
of
mea
suring a
nd m
arki
ng o
ut
equip
men
t.
1
Know
how
to
pre
par
e fo
r ben
ch
fitt
ing a
ctiv
itie
s
1.3
U
se info
rmat
ion f
rom
en
gin
eering d
raw
ings
to
carr
y out
a giv
en b
ench
fitt
ing a
ctiv
ity
□
Info
rmat
ion:
dim
ensi
onal
; geo
met
rica
l; m
ater
ials
; lim
its.
□
Engin
eering d
raw
ings:
work
ing d
raw
ings,
e.g
. co
mponen
t, g
ener
al
asse
mbly
/sub-a
ssem
bly
, fa
brica
tion,
wel
din
g,
repai
r/m
odific
atio
n;
gra
phic
al r
epre
senta
tions,
e.g
. sk
etch
es,
flow
char
ts,
phys
ical
lay
out
dia
gra
ms,
illu
stra
tions
from
man
ufa
cture
rs’ m
anual
s.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
89
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
Sel
ect
tools
and e
quip
men
t to
under
take
a g
iven
ben
ch
fitt
ing a
ctiv
ity
□
Too
ls a
nd e
quip
men
t: t
ools
, e.
g.
engin
eer’s
rule
, sc
riber
, ce
ntr
e punch
, div
ider
s, o
dd-l
eg c
allip
ers,
engin
eer’s
squar
e, s
crib
ing b
lock
, Ver
nie
r pro
trac
tor,
Ver
nie
r hei
ght
gau
ge,
dia
l te
st indic
ators
, sl
ip g
auges
; w
ork
-hold
ing d
evic
es,
e.g.
surf
ace
table
s/pla
tes,
angle
pla
tes,
v-b
lock
s an
d
clam
ps;
mar
king o
ut
med
ium
s, e
.g.
lacq
uer
, w
hitew
ash,
engin
eer’s
blu
e; c
utt
ing a
nd s
hap
ing t
ools
and e
quip
men
t, e
.g.
drills
, ta
ps
and d
ies,
re
amer
s, p
ow
ered
han
d t
ools
, han
d g
rindin
g m
achin
e, a
ngle
grinder
, fo
rmin
g a
nd b
endin
g e
quip
men
t; c
alib
ration o
f m
easu
ring a
nd m
arki
ng
out
equip
men
t.
2.2
U
se s
afe
work
ing p
ract
ices
an
d p
roce
dure
s during
mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s
□
Saf
e w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
: w
earing a
ppro
priat
e pro
tect
ive
cloth
ing a
nd
equip
men
t, e
.g.
ove
ralls
, sa
fety
foo
twea
r, e
ye p
rote
ctio
n,
hea
ring
pro
tect
ion,
use
of
bar
rier
cre
am.
□
Proce
dure
s: m
ainta
inin
g a
cle
an a
nd t
idy
work
are
a; p
repar
ing t
he
work
ar
ea;
leav
ing t
he
work
are
a in
a s
afe
and c
lean
conditio
n;
risk
as
sess
men
ts.
□
Mai
nte
nan
ce a
ctiv
itie
s: m
ainte
nan
ce u
nder
take
n f
or s
pec
ific
par
ts o
f an
en
gin
eering s
yste
m,
e.g.
pum
p,
valv
e, c
om
pre
ssor,
hea
ting,
fluid
pow
er,
man
ufa
cturing o
r te
st e
quip
men
t.
2
Be
able
to a
pply
ben
ch f
itting
tech
niq
ues
to
pro
duce
co
mponen
t par
ts
2.3
Chec
k th
at p
ort
able
m
achin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t ar
e sa
fe t
o o
per
ate
□
Port
able
mac
hin
es a
nd e
quip
men
t: m
achin
es,
e.g.
off-h
and g
rindin
g
mac
hin
es,
angle
grinder
; eq
uip
men
t, e
.g.
emer
gen
cy s
top,
use
of
guar
ds,
inte
rlock
ing d
evic
es;
safe
oper
atin
g p
roce
dure
s, e
.g.
movi
ng
par
ts,
rem
oval
of
swar
f, s
etting,
chec
king g
ap b
etw
een r
est
and w
hee
l,
whee
l im
per
fect
ions,
posi
tion o
f guar
ds,
whee
l se
lect
ion,
chan
gin
g t
he
whee
l.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
90
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.4
M
ake
and a
ssem
ble
co
mponen
t par
ts u
sing s
afe
work
ing p
ract
ices
□
Mak
e an
d a
ssem
ble
com
ponen
t par
ts:
sett
ing o
f w
ork
dat
um
s; u
se
char
ts t
o o
bta
in d
rill
dia
met
ers
for
clea
rance
and t
appin
g h
ole
; as
sem
ble
co
mponen
t par
ts in t
he
corr
ect
sequen
ce a
nd w
ithout
dam
age.
□
Saf
e w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
: per
sonal
pro
tect
ion a
nd h
ygie
ne
pro
cedure
s,
e.g.
ove
ralls
, ey
e pro
tect
ion,
bar
rier
cre
ams;
appro
priat
e beh
avio
ur
in
the
work
ing e
nvi
ronm
ent;
mai
nta
inin
g a
tid
y an
d s
afe
wor
k ar
ea;
appra
isal
of
hea
lth a
nd s
afet
y risk
s to
sel
f an
d o
ther
s, e
.g.
risk
as
sess
men
ts.
2.5
Chec
k a
giv
en c
om
ponen
t fo
r ac
cura
cy a
nd q
ual
ity
□
Giv
en c
omponen
t: r
elat
ive
to m
ainte
nan
ce r
equirem
ent,
e.g
. gas
ket,
flan
ge,
bea
ring,
loca
tion p
ins,
loca
tion k
eys,
end p
late
, guar
d,
cove
r,
han
dle
.
□
Acc
ura
cy a
nd q
ual
ity:
insp
ection t
echniq
ues
; qual
ity
contr
ol ch
arts
; co
mplia
nce
rec
ord
s.
2.6
Res
tore
the
work
are
a usi
ng
the
corr
ect
pro
cedure
s fo
r th
e dis
posa
l of w
aste
□
Res
tore
work
are
a: lea
ving t
he
work
are
a in
a s
afe
conditio
n;
clea
nin
g o
f eq
uip
men
t; s
tora
ge
of m
easu
ring a
nd m
arki
ng o
ut
equip
men
t.
□
Dis
posa
l of w
aste
: le
gal
req
uirem
ents
for
the
dis
posa
l of
was
te a
nd t
he
implic
atio
ns
of
failu
re t
o c
om
ply
; m
ater
ials
, e.
g.
met
allic
mat
eria
ls,
pla
stic
s, t
extile
s, p
aper
and c
ard;
pro
cedure
s, e
.g.
segre
gat
e, lab
el,
dis
pose
.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
91
Information for tutors
Delivery
This unit should be delivered using lectures, tutor demonstrations and practical engineering activities. Centres must ensure sufficient coverage of the learning outcomes and content. Learning outcome 2 is best suited to a practical approach, although learners will at first need to be given a broad overview of different maintenance activities associated with bench fitting practices. A good knowledge and understanding of the health and safety requirements prior to doing any practical work is essential.
Learners must be made aware of, and have access to, relevant UK health and safety legislation and know the importance of the use of appropriate risk assessment. Tutors should ensure that each learner has the correct PPE and that any activity they work on is safe for operation. Referring to the HSE website regularly is good practice.
From a teaching point of view it is best to address both learning outcomes together.
Learning outcomes 1 and 2 require access to an engineering workshop environment with relevant tools and equipment, along with a suitable maintenance activity to undertake. During delivery, learners could undertake a range of simple bench fitting and marking out tasks to enable them to practise their skills and to provide an opportunity for support and guidance to be given. Each task should require learners to think about what they are going to do, including the selection of tools and equipment and health and safety considerations when planning and completing the work activity. The opportunity to work with other individuals during the delivery of this practical work can be used to good effect to underpin learning. In particular, working with others can be used to reinforce planning, marking out practices and skills, to help learners deal with problems experienced and to support them in achieving the task.
Continually practising bench fitting skills will ensure learners are well equipped to take on the assessment tasks.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Much of the assessment evidence for this unit could come from practical activities. These can be carried out solely for the purpose of this unit but, equally, could be derived from activities associated with other units or from work-based evidence.
Learning outcome 1 is best assessed through a written assignment. Learning outcome 2 is likely to be assessed through practical exercises, supported by tutor observation reports, annotated photographs and the learner’s portfolio work logs and other documentation.
Two assignments could be used for the assessment of this unit. The first, relating to learning outcome 1, would cover assessment criteria 1.1, 1.2 and 1.3. This could be a written assignment requiring an explanation of how the relevant health and safety practices and safe working procedures are used when a specific maintenance activity is carried out. Evidence could be in the form of a written report or, alternatively, an information leaflet or poster.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
92
A second assignment, relating to learning outcome 2, would cover assessment criteria 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6. A holistic practical assignment would be most suitable, involving a task that gives learners the opportunity to select fitting tools and to use holding devices, marking out mediums and cutting and shaping tools and equipment. Learners should also have the opportunity to calibrate measuring and marking out equipment. Another task should ensure learners carry out a maintenance activity for 2.2; produce and assemble parts for 2.4; and check a component for accuracy using appropriate inspection techniques and recording documentation for 2.5. The maintenance activity given should include an opportunity to check portable machines and equipment for 2.3, and also have a requirement to dispose of waste materials for 2.6. Most of this evidence can be captured in tutor observation reports, annotated photographs and the learner’s portfolio work logs and other documentation.
Suggested resources
Books
Clarke S, Darbyshire A, Mantovani B, Weatherill B – BTEC Level 2 First Engineering (Heinemann, 2010) ISBN 9781846907234
Health and Safety Executive – Essentials of Health and Safety at Work (Health and Safety Executive, 2006) ISBN 9780717661794
Timings R L – Basic Manufacturing (Newnes, 2004) ISBN 9780750659901
Tooley M – BTEC First in Engineering (Newnes, 2006) ISBN 0750680601
Tooley M, Deacon M, O’Dwyer N – Engineering Level 2 Higher Diploma Student Book (Heinemann, 2008) ISBN 9780435756208
Website
www.youtube.com – demonstrations of bench fitting activities
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
93
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Identifying questions to answer and problems to resolve when selecting suitable measuring and marking out methods and equipment for marking out activities
Self-managers Organising time and resources, prioritising actions when producing and assembling component parts
Effective participators
Identifying improvements to working practice and good housekeeping
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Resolving problems by recommending corrective action for unsafe or defective equipment
Reflective learners
Collaborating with others when carrying out marking out activities
Team workers Reviewing progress and monitoring performance when carrying out checks to ensure that the marked out components meet the requirements of the drawing
Evaluating their own experience and learning when justifying the work-holding equipment and measurement techniques used in marking out applications
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
94
Functional Skills – Level 2
Skill When learners are…
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Discussing safe working and good housekeeping practices
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Reading information and drawings for component marking out applications
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Describing the hazards associated with bench fitting activities
Mathematics
Representing – selecting the mathematics and information to model a situation
Measuring marking out and carrying out checks for accuracy
Analysing – processing and using mathematics
Measuring marking out and carrying out checks for accuracy
Interpreting – interpreting and communicating the results of the analysis
Measuring marking out and carrying out checks for accuracy
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
95
Unit 9: Application of Welding Processes
Unit reference number: K/600/0412
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 10
Guided learning hours: 60
Unit aim This unit aims to give learners the knowledge and skills they need to safely carry out a range of welding techniques and to test welded joints for defects and irregularities.
Welding is frequently used in manufacturing engineering to ensure that permanent, high-quality joints are made between metal parts or components. This unit gives learners with little or no previous welding experience the opportunity to gain knowledge and understanding of the processes used throughout industry. This applies to a diverse number of engineering industries including those involving sheet metal, structural steel fabrication and motor vehicle bodies.
Learners will develop knowledge of the importance starting with the preparation of their work area, ensuring that health and safety legislation and safe working practices are understood and adhered to at all times. Learners will select appropriate welding equipment and check that it is in a safe and usable condition before welding. This is particularly important as learners will be working with electric currents or combustible gas mixtures.
Learners will be expected to interpret written, graphical and verbal instructions while carrying out practical tasks. They will become competent in using a fusion welding process through tutor-led demonstrations and supervised practice.
Continuous assessment should be carried out to ensure that learners’ skill levels are improved to meet the required standard. To measure their competence, learners will test their welded joints with reference to European quality standards, ensuring that they are able to produce acceptable welds as well as recognise them. This will be reinforced with the use of destructive and non-destructive tests.
Essential resources Centres delivering this unit will need access to appropriate welding equipment, consumables and materials as outlined in the Unit amplification. Centres must also have access to appropriate destructive and non-destructive test equipment.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
96
Learn
ing
ou
tcom
es,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emon
stra
te t
hat
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
omes
for
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1
Know
about
hea
lth
and s
afet
y le
gis
lation a
nd s
afe
work
ing p
ract
ices
w
hen
wel
din
g
1.1
O
utlin
e th
e hea
lth a
nd
safe
ty leg
isla
tion a
nd s
afe
work
ing p
ract
ices
use
d in a
w
eldin
g e
nvi
ronm
ent
□
Legis
lation:
aspec
ts r
elev
ant
to w
eldin
g,
e.g.
Hea
lth a
nd S
afet
y at
Work
Act
, Fi
re P
reca
utions
Act
, Contr
ol of
Subst
ance
s H
azar
dous
to H
ealth
(CO
SH
H),
Pro
visi
on a
nd U
se o
f W
ork
Equip
men
t Reg
ula
tions
(PU
WER),
H
ealth a
nd S
afet
y (F
irst
Aid
) Reg
ula
tions,
Man
ual
Han
dlin
g O
per
atio
ns
Reg
ula
tions.
□
Saf
e w
ork
ing p
ract
ices
: fire
pre
vention;
acci
den
t pre
vention a
nd
report
ing;
risk
ass
essm
ent;
fuse
s; c
ircu
it b
reak
ers;
ear
thin
g o
f eq
uip
men
t; m
anual
han
dlin
g,
e.g. m
ater
ials
, sa
fe h
andlin
g o
f gas
cy
linder
s; c
hec
king c
onditio
ns,
e.g
. gas
lea
ks,
voltag
e an
d a
mper
age,
le
ads;
per
sonal
pro
tect
ive
equip
men
t (P
PE);
ven
tila
tion a
nd e
xtra
ctio
n;
closi
ng d
ow
n e
quip
men
t sa
fely
; st
orin
g e
quip
men
t; s
afe
dis
posa
l of
was
te m
ater
ials
; em
ergen
cy p
roce
dure
s, e
.g.
within
the
lear
nin
g
envi
ronm
ent,
work
pla
ce;
com
mon h
azar
ds
asso
ciat
ed w
ith w
eldin
g,
e.g.
fum
es,
burn
s, r
adia
tion,
elec
tric
shock
.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
97
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
Sel
ect
the
tools
, eq
uip
men
t an
d info
rmat
ion n
eeded
w
hen
mat
eria
ls a
re t
o b
e jo
ined
by
wel
din
g
□
Too
ls a
nd e
quip
men
t: e
quip
men
t av
aila
bili
ty,
e.g.
cable
s, h
ose
s,
torc
hes
/ele
ctro
de
hold
ers,
gas
pre
ssure
reg
ula
tors
, flow
met
ers;
as
sem
blin
g w
eldin
g e
quip
men
t, e
.g.
cable
s, w
eld r
eturn
cla
mps,
el
ectr
ode
hold
ers,
gas
supplie
s, s
afet
y dev
ices
; se
ttin
g a
nd a
dju
stin
g
wel
din
g c
onditio
ns,
e.g
. gas
pre
ssure
s/flow
rat
es,
voltag
e, a
mper
age;
co
nnec
ting t
he
wel
d r
eturn
lea
d.
□
Info
rmat
ion s
ourc
es:
safe
ty inst
ruct
ions;
job inst
ruct
ions;
engin
eering
dra
win
gs;
qual
ity
contr
ol docu
men
tation,
e.g.
wel
d p
roce
dure
sp
ecific
atio
n,
reco
rd/r
eport
ing s
hee
t.
2
Be
able
to p
repar
e fo
r w
ork
in a
w
eldin
g
envi
ronm
ent
2.2
Pr
epar
e a
list
of
consu
mab
les
that
are
nee
ded
for
a w
eldin
g
pro
cess
□
Wel
din
g:
pro
cess
es,
e.g.
oxy
acet
ylen
e, m
anual
met
al a
rc (
MM
A),
met
al
iner
t gas
(M
IG),
met
al a
ctiv
e gas
(M
AG
), c
ore
d w
ire,
tungst
en iner
t gas
(T
IG),
pla
sma-
arc.
□
Consu
mab
les:
sto
rage
of
consu
mab
les;
consu
mab
les
appro
priat
e fo
r w
eldin
g p
roce
sses
, e.
g.:
□
for
MM
A:
e.g.
rutile
, bas
ic,
nic
kel al
loy,
cel
lulo
sic,
sta
inle
ss s
teel
, oth
er
elec
trodes
□
for
MIG
, M
AG
and c
ore
d w
ire:
e.g
. tw
o w
ire
types
fro
m d
iffe
rent
gro
ups,
tw
o d
iffe
rent
shie
ldin
g g
ases
wher
e ap
plic
able
□
for
TIG
, pla
sma-
arc:
e.g
. one
size
of
elec
trode,
tw
o t
ypes
of
fille
r w
ire
from
diffe
rent
mat
eria
l gro
ups
□
for
gas
wel
din
g:
oxy
gen
; ac
etyl
ene;
fill
er w
ire,
e.g
. tw
o d
iffe
rent
size
s,
two d
iffe
rent
mat
eria
l gro
ups.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
98
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
Pr
oduce
tw
o join
ts s
afel
y an
d t
o a
required
qual
ity
stan
dar
d u
sing d
iffe
rent
wel
din
g p
osi
tions
□
Saf
ety:
fire
pre
vention;
acci
den
t pre
vention a
nd r
eport
ing;
risk
as
sess
men
t; m
anual
han
dlin
g;
chec
king c
onditio
ns,
e.g
. gas
lea
ks,
voltag
e an
d a
mper
age,
lea
ds;
per
sonal
pro
tect
ive
equip
men
t (P
PE);
ve
ntila
tion a
nd e
xtra
ctio
n;
closi
ng d
ow
n e
quip
men
t sa
fely
.
□
Wel
din
g p
osi
tions:
to
British
Sta
ndar
d (
BS)
EN
287,
e.g.
flat
(PA
),
horizo
nta
l ve
rtic
al (
PB),
horizo
nta
l (P
C),
ver
tica
l upw
ards
(PF)
, ve
rtic
al
dow
nw
ards
(PG
); w
eldin
g t
echniq
ue,
e.g
. to
rch a
nd f
iller
angle
s fo
r va
rious
posi
tions.
3
Be
able
to p
roduce
jo
ints
to w
eldin
g
stan
dar
ds
3.2
Pr
oduce
tw
o join
ts s
afel
y an
d t
o a
required
qual
ity
stan
dar
d u
sing d
iffe
rent
types
of jo
int
□
Saf
ety:
fire
pre
vention;
acci
den
t pre
vention a
nd r
eport
ing;
risk
as
sess
men
t; m
anual
han
dlin
g;
chec
king c
onditio
ns,
e.g
. gas
lea
ks,
voltag
e an
d a
mper
age,
lea
ds;
per
sonal
pro
tect
ive
equip
men
t (P
PE);
ve
ntila
tion a
nd e
xtra
ctio
n;
closi
ng d
ow
n e
quip
men
t sa
fely
.
□
Join
ts:
pro
duci
ng join
ts u
sing w
eldin
g p
roce
sses
, e.
g.:
□
for
MM
A,
MIG
, M
AG
and c
ore
d w
ire:
a f
illet
and a
butt
wel
d
□
for
TIG
, pla
sma-
arc
and g
as w
eldin
g:
a butt
wel
d a
nd e
ither
a f
illet
wel
d
or
an a
uto
gen
ous
wel
d (
without
fille
r w
ire)
.
□
Mat
eria
l: t
ypes
, e.
g.
carb
on s
teel
, st
ainle
ss s
teel
, al
um
iniu
m;
form
s, e
.g.
pla
te,
sect
ion,
pip
e/tu
be,
shee
t m
etal
les
s th
an 3
mm
thic
k.
□
Qual
ity
stan
dar
d:
min
imum
wel
d q
ual
ity
equiv
alen
t to
the
leve
l giv
en in
the
rele
vant
Euro
pea
n/I
nte
rnat
ional
Sta
ndar
d,
e.g.
BS E
N I
SO
5817 a
nd
BS E
N I
SO
10042;
mee
ting t
he
required
dim
ensi
onal
acc
ura
cy w
ithin
the
spec
ific
atio
n.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
99
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4
Be
able
to p
erfo
rm
des
truct
ive
and
non-d
estr
uct
ive
test
s on
wel
ded
jo
ints
4.1
Pe
rform
tw
o d
estr
uct
ive
and
two n
on-d
estr
uct
ive
test
s an
d r
ecord
the
test
outc
om
es
□
Wel
d t
esting:
safe
ty w
hen
usi
ng t
est
equip
men
t an
d c
hem
ical
s; v
isual
in
spec
tion f
or
def
ects
and irr
egula
rities
; non-d
estr
uct
ive,
e.g
. vi
sual
, dye
pen
etra
nt,
flu
ore
scen
t par
ticl
e, m
agnet
ic p
articl
e; d
estr
uct
ive,
e.g
. m
acro
scopic
exa
min
atio
n,
nic
k bre
ak (
frac
ture
) te
sts,
ben
d t
ests
; non-
ther
mal
spec
imen
rem
ova
l pro
cess
es,
e.g.
han
d s
aws,
pow
er s
aws,
ab
rasi
ve d
iscs
; sp
ecim
en p
repar
atio
n p
roce
sses
, e.
g.
rem
ovi
ng s
lag,
spat
ter
and s
urf
ace
irre
gula
rities
, cl
eanin
g,
deg
reas
ing,
polis
hin
g,
mak
ing s
aw c
uts
in w
elds
to b
e fr
actu
re t
este
d;
typic
al d
efec
ts;
conse
quen
ces
of
def
ects
; re
cord
ing a
nd r
eport
ing o
f w
eld d
efec
ts.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
100
Information for tutors
Delivery
This unit should be delivered using tutor-led demonstrations followed by practical tasks, during which learners can gain experience of working with appropriate tools and equipment. Underpinning knowledge could be delivered using practical demonstrations supported by classroom based sessions focusing on specific theoretical aspects of the processes used.
Tutors must ensure that learners understand the hazards and safe working practices associated with welding equipment before they are allowed to use the process. Learners should be introduced to the process using a series of graded, formative tasks to enable them to demonstrate their competence before attempting the summative tasks.
Learners should be encouraged to evaluate their performance through formative tasks using a combination of tutor and self/peer assessment. Learners should be provided with appropriate feedback, both formative and summative, to further encourage their development. The early introduction of weld testing in the workshop will encourage discussion and self-assessment, enabling learners to improve weld quality by making adjustments to process parameters.
The learning outcomes are ordered to enable learners to develop an understanding of the fundamental stages involved in the production of welded joints, irrespective of the process used. Job instructions should be written in a logical format, that will lead learners to consider all aspects of the task from safety, selection of tools, equipment and materials, process set-up and operation, through to production and testing of the welded joint.
Summative tasks will assess learners’ competence in the use of the welding process and technique and their ability to control process parameters to produce welds that meet a specified quality standard.
Work-based learners should be encouraged to relate to the processes and techniques used at their place of work and also the wider perspective of welding processes used in industry. Centres should relate tasks to the needs of local industries to prepare learners not currently employed with the appropriate skills and knowledge necessary to enter employment.
Note that the use of ‘e.g.’ in the Unit amplification is to give an indication and illustration of the breadth and depth of the area or topic. As such, not all content that follows an ‘e.g.’ needs to be taught or assessed.
Assessment
The centre will devise and mark the assessment for this unit.
Learners must meet all assessment criteria to pass the unit.
Achievement of the assessment criteria will require evidence of the production of welded joints in a workshop environment and responses to questions, either oral, written or a combination of both. Observations carried out during practical sessions should evidence the learners understanding of health and safety legislation and safe working practices; however a written description would produce best evidence against this criterion (1.1). In the event of a breach of health and safety or approved safe working practices, the assessment should be terminated.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
101
Assessment criteria 2.1 and 2.2 must be completed satisfactorily before proceeding with criteria 3.1 and 3.2. It is expected that observation will capture learners’ performance when using these welding processes. On completion of the welded joints, it is recommended that learners carry out the mandatory visual inspection of the weld during 3.1 and 3.2. The outcome from these welding processes should compare with the quality standard required. The requirement for 4.1 can be achieved during or after the practical activities and could be listed as a separate task.
In order to document evidence of practical tasks, centres may wish to consider the use of a logbook or portfolio to record the processes and techniques used. The inclusion of photographic evidence, drawings and a written description of each stage of the task would enable learners to demonstrate their competence with regard to the tools and equipment. Health and safety legislation and working practices relative to the task should be included in each description, as well as references to the safe operation of specific tools and equipment.
Suggested resources
Books
Jeffus L – Welding Principles and Applications (Delmar Learning, 2007) ISBN 9781418052751
Timings R – Fabrication and Welding Engineering (Newnes, 2008) ISBN 9780750666916
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
102
Delivery of personal, learning and thinking skills
The table below identifies the opportunities for personal, learning and thinking skills (PLTS) that have been included within the assessment criteria of this unit.
Skill When learners are…
Independent enquirers
Analysing the welds that they have completed to visually examine the quality of welds and identify weld irregularities
Self-managers Planning and organising their time and resources when selecting the correct tools, equipment and consumables and carrying out welding techniques
Although PLTS are identified within this unit as an inherent part of the assessment criteria, there are further opportunities to develop a range of PLTS through various approaches to teaching and learning.
Skill When learners are…
Creative thinkers
Continuously exploring the effects of changing welding parameters and techniques
Generating ideas as to the cause of weld defects either by visual examination or destructive or non-destructive testing
Reflective learners
Analysing the outcomes of changing welding parameters and techniques
Visually examining their weld samples for defects and irregularities and understanding their causes
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
103
Functional Skills – Level 2
English
Speaking, listening and communication – make a range of contributions to discussions in a range of contexts, including those that are unfamiliar, and make effective presentations
Speaking and listening to peers and those supervising when reviewing the quality of welds produced, and the results of testing
Reading – select, read, understand and compare texts and use them to gather information, ideas, arguments and opinions
Selecting, reading and using appropriate sources of information during welding tasks, e.g. job instructions, safety instructions, quality
specifications
Writing – write a range of texts, including extended written documents, communicating information, ideas and opinions, effectively and persuasively
Describing health and safety legislation and common hazards associated with welding
Planning and justifying the tools and equipment required for welding, and listing consumables
Writing a report to show the results of destructive or non-destructive tests
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
104
13 Further information and useful publications
To get in touch with us visit our ‘Contact us’ pages:
● Edexcel: www.edexcel.com/contactus
● BTEC: www.edexcel.com/btec
● Pearson Work Based Learning and Colleges: www.edexcel.com/about-wbl
● books, software and online resources for UK schools and colleges: www.pearsonschoolsandfecolleges.co.uk
Key publications:
● Adjustments for candidates with disabilities and learning difficulties – Access and Arrangements and Reasonable Adjustments, General and Vocational qualifications (Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ))
● Equality Policy (Pearson)
● Recognition of Prior Learning Policy and Process (Pearson)
● UK Information Manual (Pearson)
● UK Quality Vocational Assurance Handbook (Pearson).
All of these publications are available on our website.
Publications on the quality assurance of BTEC qualifications are available on our website at www.edexcel.com/btec/delivering-BTEC/quality/Pages
Our publications catalogue lists all the material available to support our qualifications. To access the catalogue and order publications, please go to www.edexcel.com/resources/publications/Pages
Additional resources
If you need further learning and teaching materials to support planning and delivery for your learners, there is a wide range of BTEC resources available.
Any publisher can seek endorsement for their resources, and, if they are successful, we will list their BTEC resources on our website at: www.edexcel.com/resources/publications/Pages
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Certificate in Military Engineering – Specification – Issue 1 – September 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
105
14 Professional development and training
Pearson supports UK and international customers with training related to BTEC qualifications. This support is available through a choice of training options offered on our website: www.edexcel.com/resources/Training.
The support we offer focuses on a range of issues, such as:
● planning for the delivery of a new programme
● planning for assessment and grading
● developing effective assignments
● building your team and teamwork skills
● developing learner-centred learning and teaching approaches
● building in effective and efficient quality assurance systems.
The national programme of training we offer is on our website at: www.edexcel.com/resources/Training. You can request centre-based training through the website or you can contact one of our advisers in the Training from Pearson UK team via Customer Services to discuss your training needs.
BTEC training and support for the lifetime of the qualifications
Training and networks: our training programme ranges from free introductory events through sector-specific opportunities to detailed training on all aspects of delivery, assignments and assessment. We also host some regional network events to allow you to share your experiences, ideas and best practice with other BTEC colleagues in your region.
Regional support: our team of Curriculum Development Managers and Curriculum Support Consultants, based around the country, are responsible for providing advice and support in centres. They can help you with planning and curriculum developments.
To get in touch with our dedicated support teams please visit: www.edexcel.com/contactus
Your Pearson support team
Whether you want to talk to a sector specialist, browse online or submit your query for an individual response, there’s someone in our Pearson support team to help you whenever – and however – you need:
● Subject Advisors: find out more about our subject advisor team – immediate, reliable support from a fellow subject expert – at: www.edexcel.com/Aboutus/contact-us/Pages
● Ask the Expert: submit your question online to our Ask the Expert online service www.edexcel.com/aboutus/contact-us/ask-expert/Pages and we will make sure your query is handled by a subject specialist.
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering
– S
pec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
10
6
An
nexe A
Map
pin
g w
ith
NV
Q/
com
pete
nce
-base
d q
uali
fica
tio
ns
The
grid b
elow
map
s th
e kn
ow
ledge
cove
red in t
he
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering (
QCF)
agai
nst
the
under
pin
nin
g
know
ledge
of
the
Pea
rson E
dex
cel Le
vel 2 N
VQ
Dip
lom
a in
Engin
eering M
ainte
nan
ce a
nd I
nst
alla
tion (
QCF)
and t
he
Pea
rson E
dex
cel Le
vel 2
NVQ
Dip
lom
a in
Per
form
ing E
ngin
eering O
per
atio
ns
(QCF)
. Cen
tres
can
use
this
map
pin
g w
hen
pla
nnin
g h
olis
tic
del
iver
y an
d a
sses
smen
t ac
tivi
ties
.
KEY
#
indic
ates
par
tial
cove
rage
of
know
ledge
in t
he
NVQ
/com
pet
ence
-bas
ed q
ual
ific
atio
n u
nit
A b
lank
spac
e in
dic
ates
no c
over
age
of
the
know
ledge
BTEC
Sp
eci
ali
st u
nit
s
NV
Q/
com
pete
nce
-base
d u
nit
s
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
Unit 6
Unit 7
Unit 8
Unit 9
Pears
on
Ed
exce
l Level 2
NV
Q D
iplo
ma in
En
gin
eeri
ng
Main
ten
an
ce a
nd
In
stallati
on
(Q
CF)
1
Com
ply
ing w
ith S
tatu
tory
Reg
ula
tions
and
Org
anis
atio
nal
Saf
ety
Req
uirem
ents
#
2
Usi
ng a
nd I
nte
rpre
ting E
ngin
eering D
ata
and
Docu
men
tation
#
4
Han
din
g O
ver
and C
onfirm
ing C
om
ple
tion o
f M
ainte
nan
ce o
r In
stal
lation A
ctiv
itie
s
#
#
#
9
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Fault L
oca
tion o
n E
lect
rica
l Equip
men
t an
d
Circu
its
#
10
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Mai
nte
nan
ce A
ctiv
itie
s on E
lect
rica
l Equip
men
t
#
11
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Modific
atio
ns
or
Rew
irin
g E
lect
rica
l Circu
its
#
12
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Sch
edule
d M
ainte
nan
ce T
asks
on E
lect
rica
l Equip
men
t
#
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 C
ertifica
te in M
ilita
ry E
ngin
eering –
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Iss
ue
1 –
Sep
tem
ber
2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion
Lim
ited
2014
10
7
BTEC
Sp
eci
ali
st u
nit
s
NV
Q/
com
pete
nce
-base
d u
nit
s
Unit 1
Unit 2
Unit 3
Unit 4
Unit 5
Unit 6
Unit 7
Unit 8
Unit 9
16
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Fault L
oca
tion o
n F
luid
Pow
er E
quip
men
t an
d C
ircu
its
#
17
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Mai
nte
nan
ce A
ctiv
itie
s on F
luid
Pow
er
Equip
men
t
#
18
Car
ryin
g O
ut
Sch
edule
d M
ainte
nan
ce T
asks
on F
luid
Po
wer
Equip
men
t
#
Pears
on
Ed
exce
l Level 2
NV
Q D
iplo
ma in
Perf
orm
ing
En
gin
eeri
ng
Op
era
tio
ns
(QC
F)
3
Usi
ng a
nd C
om
munic
atin
g T
echnic
al I
nfo
rmat
ion
#
5
Produci
ng C
om
ponen
ts U
sing H
and F
itting T
echniq
ues
#
19
Mai
nta
inin
g M
echan
ical
Dev
ices
and S
yste
ms
#
21
Mai
nta
inin
g F
luid
Pow
er E
quip
men
t
#
#
27
Pre
par
ing a
nd U
sing M
anual
Met
al A
rc W
eldin
g
Equip
men
t
#
#
28
Pre
par
ing a
nd U
sing M
anual
TIG
or
Pla
sma-
Arc
Wel
din
g
Equip
men
t
#
#
29
Pre
par
ing a
nd U
sing M
anual
MIG
, M
AG
and O
ther
Continuous
Wire
Wel
din
g E
quip
men
t
#
#
30
Pre
par
ing a
nd U
sing G
as W
eldin
g E
quip
men
t
#
#
37
Mai
nta
inin
g E
lect
rica
l Equip
men
t/Sys
tem
s
#
#
38
Mai
nta
inin
g E
lect
ronic
Equip
men
t/Sys
tem
s
#
ma2
20914G
:\W
ORD
PRO
C\L
T\P
D\S
PEC
IALI
ST Q
UALS
\9781446914168_BTEC_L2
_SPL
T_CERT_M
E.D
OC.1
–112/1
September 2014 For more information on Edexcel and BTEC qualifications please visit our websites: www.edexcel.com and www.btec.co.uk BTEC is a registered trademark of Pearson Education Limited Pearson Education Limited. Registered in England and Wales No. 872828 Registered Office: Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM20 2JE. VAT Reg No GB 278 537121