pebble bed modular reactor
DESCRIPTION
Pebble Bed Modular Reactor. Eric Glatstein, May 8, 2003. Pebble Bed Modular Reactor. nuclear fission reactor uranium or thorium fueled graphite “moderated” high temperature operation helium cooled small, “modular” construction intrinsic safety. Electrostatics. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Pebble Bed Modular Reactor
Eric Glatstein, May 8, 2003
![Page 2: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Pebble Bed Modular Reactor
• nuclear fission reactor
• uranium or thorium fueled
• graphite “moderated”
• high temperature operation
• helium cooled
• small, “modular” construction
• intrinsic safety
![Page 3: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Electrostatics
“+” and “–” charges like charges repel opposite charges attract
![Page 4: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Plum-pudding
Since atoms evidently are electrically neutral,
+ / - charges must be uniformly distributed.
![Page 5: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Rutherford scattering (c.1911)
(Really Marsden and Geiger.)
![Page 6: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Rutherford scattering
“+” concentrated in small volumes
![Page 7: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
So, what’s holding “nucleus” together against “+” electrical repulsion?
![Page 8: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
So, what’s holding “nucleus” together against “+” electrical repulsion?
Strong Nuclear Force
![Page 9: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The New Physics
• Niels Bohr (1913)– hypothesizes quantized angular momentum
• Erwin Schrödinger (1925)– describes electron orbits with “wave equation”
• Werner Heisenberg (1927)– ties it all together with the “indeterminacy principle”
• Karl Llewellyn (1930)– describes the law with quantum jargon
![Page 10: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Neutrons
• James Chadwick (1932)
– in addition to positively charged “protons,” nuclei contain neutral “neutron” particles.
– together, called “nucleons.”
![Page 11: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Atomic mass
neutron number, N, v. proton number, Z
N
Z
![Page 12: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Missing mass
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
mass-measured (amu)
ma
ss
(a
mu
)
measured
calculated
![Page 13: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Missing mass
The weight of a nucleus is less than the sum of its parts.
-0.0120
-0.0100
-0.0080
-0.0060
-0.0040
-0.0020
0.0000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
mass-measured (amu)
mis
sin
g m
as
s p
er
nu
cle
on
(a
mu
)
delta / A
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
mass-measured (amu)
ma
ss
(a
mu
)
measured
calculated
Fe
U
H
![Page 14: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Nuclei (like everything else) try to approach lowest energy level:
lowest point on graph
• light nuclei undergo “fusion”
• heavy nuclei undergo “fission”
Missing mass released from “Binding Energy” between nucleons.
(E = m c2 )
Stability
![Page 15: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Fission• Otto Hahn (1939)
– bombarded uranium with neutrons
– light “fragments” and heat unexpectedly appear
• more neutrons out than put in
• energy largely released as “Kinetic Energy” (gets Hot)
![Page 16: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Neutrons “Fast” and “Slow”
Most emitted neutrons travel too fast to cause another uranium fission:
do not remain near nucleus long enough to cause instability
For self-sustaining “chain” reactions, a “moderator” is need to slow emitted neutrons.
• light -- transfer momentum
• low neutron absorption
![Page 17: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Self-sustaining “chain” reactions
• Oklo, Gabon,
1.7 – 1.5 BYBP
• Chicago, Illinois,
61 YBP (1942)
Enrico Fermi
(1st artificial)
![Page 18: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Common moderators
• Graphite
• Hydrogen-2 (deuterium; “heavy” water)
• Hydrogen-1 (“light” water)
• Boron
![Page 19: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Useful materials
Atomic Energy Act of 1954
42 U.S.C. § 2014. Definitions. (z) The term "source material" means (1) uranium, thorium, or any other material which is determined by the Commission . . . to be source material; or (2) ores containing one or more of the foregoing materials, in such concentration as the Commission may by regulation determine from time to time. (aa) The term "special nuclear material" means (1) plutonium, uranium enriched in the isotope 233 or in the isotope 235, and any other material which the Commission . . . determines to be special nuclear material, but does not include source material; or (2) any material artificially enriched by any of the foregoing, but does not include source material.
![Page 20: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
“Fissile” materials
23592U (naturally occurring at ~ 0.7% ) t½ = 700 million yr
23392U (effectively zero in nature)
10n +
23892U 239
92U 23993Np 239
94Pu
t½ = 24 min t½ = 2.4 day t½ = 24,000y
10n +
23290Th 233
90Th 23391Pa 233
92U
t½ = 22 min t½ = 27 day t½ = 160 thous yr
![Page 21: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Coolants• Air
– O2 can support corrosion / combustion
• Carbon dioxide
• Water– “light” and “heavy”
• Liquid metals, e.g., sodium
• Inert gases, e.g., helium– good heat transfer– no corrosion
![Page 22: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Nuclear “reactor”
(“batch” configuration)
![Page 23: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Reactor control
• control rod withdrawal and insertion
• reactivity “poisoning” at higher temperatures
![Page 24: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Pressurized Water Reactor
![Page 25: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Pressurized (Light) Water Reactors
USS NAUTILUS (SSN-571)Launched: January 21, 1954
Byron Generating StationOperating license (first unit) granted: 1985
![Page 26: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Optimism . . .
“Our children will enjoy in their homes electrical energy too cheap to meter.”
Lewis L. Strauss, Chairman, Atomic Energy Commission,
September 16, 1954.
![Page 27: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Cynicism . . .
![Page 28: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Problems for reactors to overcome . . .
– hard to build and operate well– “run-away” danger– radioactive leaks– waste / proliferation risk– low temperature; low thermal efficiency– output not easily dispatchable– outages necessary for regular refueling– uranium-235 is rare– people make mistakes– still waiting for the waste repository . . .
![Page 29: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Benefits . . .
– near zero greenhouse emissions
(at least from generating stations)
– Burn-up decommissioned bomb materials
– maintain an electrical generating mix
![Page 30: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Policy . . .
• Appropriate regulation
– set rigorous standards
– enforce standards consistently
– let new technologies thrive or die on their own
![Page 31: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Hard to build and operate well
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission believes that standardization of nuclear power plant designs is an important initiative that can significantly enhance the safety, reliability and availability of nuclear plants [and encourages] . . . plant designs which:
-- Are essentially complete in both scope and level of detail;
-- Cover plant design, construction, and quality assurance programs;
-- Satisfy regulatory requirements before construction begins; and
-- Can be referenced for individual plant applications.
52 FR 34884, September 15, 1987
![Page 32: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Hard to build and operate well (cont.)Experience has shown that the "one-of-a-kind" approach to reactor design, construction, and operation has led to an operating reactor population of great variability and diversity, even among reactors from the same vendor.* * *This variability has introduced significant differences in the licensing and operation of these plants, in the transfer of experience from one reactor to another, in technical specifications, in operating procedures, and in backfitting considerations.
Thus . . . 10 CFR PART 52 — EARLY SITE PERMITS;
STANDARD DESIGN CERTIFICATIONS; AND COMBINED LICESNSE FOR NUCLEAR PLANTS
![Page 33: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
March 24, 2002
DONOR WON PRAISE IN ENERGY REPORT
By DON VAN NATTA Jr.
WASHINGTON, March 23
In Chapter 5 of Vice President Dick Cheney's [May 2001] national energy report, executives of the once-moribund nuclear power industry were probably thrilled to read that the White House supported "the expansion of nuclear power in the United States as a major component of our national energy policy." * * *One such proposal was the development of a new nuclear reactor designed to produce electricity -- a gas-cooled reactor built on tennis-ball-size graphite spheres -- that the report said "has inherent safety features." * * *
![Page 34: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Cont.Exelon, the nation's largest nuclear energy company, is the only American corporation developing a design for the pebble-bed reactor, which it says will lead to a new generation of cheaper, smaller and more efficient nuclear reactors. The company says the pebble-bed reactor will be safer, too, though environmentalists in the United States and in other countries have sharply disputed this, calling the pebble-bed reactor a failed system vulnerable to terrorist attack. * * *The administration's endorsement of Exelon's technology was learned through interviews and documents provided to The New York Times by the corporation itself. * * *Exelon provided The New York Times with two documents that the company submitted to the task force that had not been made public by Mr. Cheney: a pamphlet describing the pebble-bed reactor and a one-page description of the reactor's benefits.
The document begins, "Exelon Corporation believes that we have found a technology that possesses the characteristics necessary to successfully compete in a deregulated environment in the P.B.M.R., a design under development in South Africa."
The document argues that the reactor is "safe, economic and clean."
![Page 35: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
“Pebble Bed Modular Reactor”
(“plug flow” configuration)
![Page 36: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Reactor interior
(AVR reactor)
![Page 37: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
“Pebble” fuel elements
![Page 38: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
“Pebble” fuel handling
AVR reactor• 360,000 “pebbles” in core • 120 day detention• 15 cycles
![Page 39: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Fuels
•PBMR developed for Thorium cycle (Germany 1967)
•Similar HTGR configuration operated with uranium
– PECO Peach Bottom unit 1 (Lancaster, Pa.)
(1967 - 1974)
![Page 40: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
SafetyProponents
• Each pebble self-contained• Fuel stable to 2,800°C
– “Design basis” 1,600°C accident
• Releases limited from one “module”
• No need for “defense in depth”• No need to cool pebbles before
disposal
Opponents
• Manufacturing defects
• Graphite burns
• Keep the “defense in depth”
• Pebbles large relative to fuel rods
![Page 41: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
“Bomb grade” fuels
• Highly enriched uranium (80% 235U)
– 500 tons of HEU from 30,000 dismantled Russian nuclear weapons to be blended to “proliferation-resistant” low-enriched uranium (LEU) by 2013.
• Mixed Oxide (“MOX”)
– DOE believes that half of 100 ton plutonium stockpile is excess of military needs.
![Page 42: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
“Light Water” / “Pebble Bed”
PWR PBMRThermal power (MW) 3,000 300
Burn-up (MWDt / MT) 60,000 80,000Power density (MW / m3) ~100 ~8
Reactor exit temperature (°C) 300 900Thermal efficiency 33% 45% - 50%
Capital cost (per Watt e) $75 (?) $1 (?)
![Page 43: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Thermodynamic efficiency
Hot Cool
work
Effmax = 1 - ——TC
TH
![Page 44: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
April 16, 2002
Exelon Generation Not Proceeding with PBMR
Exelon Generation has announced today that it will not be proceeding with Pebble Bed Modular Reactor (PBMR) project beyond the completion of the current feasibility study phase. Exelon Generation has advised PBMR Pty (Ltd.), the entity managing the project, that it will continue to devote technical personnel and executive leadership to the project for the time being. As of June 30, 2002, Exelon Generation’s support of the project will total
about $20 million.
Exelon recently conducted its regular review of investments to ensure a disciplined strategy focused on the fundamentals of generation, power marketing and distribution. Becoming a
reactor supplier is no longer consistent with Exelon’s strategy.
![Page 45: Pebble Bed Modular Reactor](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022081504/56814685550346895db3a84b/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Conclusions . . .
• Probably safer
• Probably cheaper
• It would be nice to beat the swords into plowshares
• Time will tell