pediatric tuberculosis

Upload: asena-tuiketei

Post on 07-Mar-2016

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Hot topics / Unresolved issues inClinical Practice

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    1/36

    PEDIATRIC TUBERCULOSIS

    Hot topics / Unresolved issues inClinical Practice

    Ann M. Loeffler, M.D.Legacy Emanuel Childrens Hospital

    Portland, ORFaculty Consultant

    Francis J. Curry National TB Center

    February 28, 2009

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    2/36

    Hot topics / unresolved issues

    The continuum between LTBI and TB disease Bacteriologic diagnosis of TB in children

    Imaging of pediatric TB suspects Treatment of pediatric TB

    Use of and need for EMB

    Doses of drugs (more needed)

    MDR and MDR-LTBI

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    3/36

    TB vs. LTBI Latent TB infection is defined as a positive TST (or

    IGRA) with a normal chest radiograph and no signsor symptoms of TB disease

    TB disease suggests metabolically active

    populations of M. tuberculosis In pediatrics, common radiographic findings

    include intrathoracic lymphadenopathy and

    parenchymal changes in any lobe Cavitary disease is unusual before adolescents

    Pleural disease is relatively uncommon

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    4/36

    TB vs. LTBI Approximately 50% of children diagnosed with TB

    in the developed world are asymptomatic Many have been diagnosed early in their course

    (especially during contact investigation of a

    contagious adult) In developing countries,

    there is limited active case

    findings, and essentially all

    individuals with TB disease

    are symptomatic

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    5/36

    TB vs. LTBI Continuum between LTBI and

    TB disease

    Early after infection, air space focus andadenopathy (primary complex) seen

    Most of these cases involute and can be treated asLTBI

    Some are actively replicating and will result insevere disease if not treated

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    6/36

    TB vs. LTBI In the developed world we treat almost any infiltrate or

    enlarged intrathoracic lymph node in a TST positive child asTB disease (Even WHO treats isolated LAD as disease)

    In early INH studies:

    among children with asymptomatic primary TB treated withINH alone, 90% reduction in complications compared to

    placebo

    Mount NEJM 1961 265; 713-21

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    7/36

    TB vs. LTBI Among placebo recipients: 9% complications in those with

    parenchymal changes and 2.5% in those with only LAD

    Among 1400 children who received INH only 2 had

    definite extrapulmonary progression, 30 intrathoracicprogression

    Mount NEJM 1961 265; 713-21

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    8/36

    TB vs. LTBI

    To complicate things more: Not all children with culture confirmed

    tuberculosis have a positive TST 14% of 200 children had negative TST at dx

    5.5% had persistently negative TST (less severe dz)

    Some children with normal chest radiographshave positive cultures

    Steiner Am J Dis Child. 134:747-50 1980

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    9/36

    TB vs. LTBI - My philosophy Try not to overcall TB on the chest radiograph

    Isolated calcification, pleural thickening, andperibronchial cuffing are unlikely to be TB

    If it doesnt look like TB - consider treatment ofother causes and repeat a film in a few weeks(monitor closely)

    Treat more aggressively: Contacts, TST positive, symptomatic and young

    children

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    10/36

    Bacteriologic diagnosis Fewer than 25% of pediatric

    cases confirmed by culture

    Sputum, gastric aspirates,BAL

    CSF

    Biopsy specimens

    Others

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    11/36

    Gastric aspiration People swallow mucus in

    their sleep

    Collect gastric contentsbefore the stomach empties

    www.nationaltbcenter.edu/pediatric_tb

    RESOURCE button at left

    has many forms andreferences as well as l ink tothis video instruction

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    12/36

    Gastric aspirate yield

    A negative culture does not rule out TB First specimen is the very highest yield

    Nearly 100% yield for

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    13/36

    Respiratory specimen yield

    Outpatient gastric aspirates 3 California clinics

    41% overall yield

    48% yield for inpatients

    37% yield for outpatients

    90% of positives obtained on the first day

    Lobato, Loeffler, Furst et al Pediatrics. 102(4):E40, 1998

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    14/36

    Induced sputum vs. gastric aspirates

    South Africa

    Sputum induction: salbutamol MDI, 15 minnebulized saline, chest PT and NP suctioning

    22% yield (n=54)

    Gastric aspiration: 20 ml saline, wait 2-3 min

    16% yield (n=40)

    High rate of smear positive and HIV infected

    Zar, Hanslo, Apolles, et al Lancet 365:130-4 2005

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    15/36

    Sputum induction

    Induced sputum Ugandan children 12% positive smear and 30% positive

    culture in HIV endemic area

    Int J TB Lung Dis 9:716-26, 2005

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    16/36

    Nasopharyngeal aspiration

    94 children enrolled 8.5% smear and 24% culture pos by NPA

    9.6% smear and 22% culture pos by sputuminduction

    Owens Arch Dis Child 2007;92:693696

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    17/36

    Other tests

    Stool PCR 38% sensitive among culture + children Laryngeal swabs 28% culture positive

    String test intriguing Transoesophageal endosonography with fine needle

    aspiration

    Wolf Am J Trop Med Hyg. 79:893-8, 2008

    Thakur An Trop Paed 19 :333-6, 1999Chow F BMC Infect Dis 6:67, 2006

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    18/36

    Bronchoscopy / BAL

    Valuable for evaluation of other diagnoses

    Evaluation / treatment of airway compression

    AFB culture collection

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    19/36

    BAL culture yield

    Author Year Region % + cxBAL % +gastric

    Cakir 2008 Turkey 12.8% 10%

    Bibi 2002 Israel 4% ----

    Singh 2000 India 22% 12%

    Somu 1995 India 12% 32%

    Abadco 1992 USA 10% 50%

    Norrman 1988 Scandanavia 21% 12%

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    20/36

    Imaging

    Standard of care is two view chest radiograph

    CT scan clearly identifies abnormalities notseen on plain film

    Most helpful for lymphadenopathy (NEED IV contrast) >80% of children have LAD on CT

    37% of patients mangt altered by CT

    CT should be reserved for ptswith equivocal dx

    Kim AJR 168:1005-9 1997

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    21/36

    Pediatric treatment Pediatric TB is paucibacillary and likely needs less

    aggressive treatment to cure

    Because the populations are small, there is lessrisk of emergence or amplification of resistance

    Many providers use INH & RIF alone for isolatedLAD

    Studies show efficacy and tolerability of early twiceweekly regimens for three drug regimen

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    22/36

    Pediatric treatment - ethambutol (EMB)

    Providers reluctant to use ethambutol in children due to

    difficulty in monitoring optic toxicity

    Several reports now support the safety of ethambutol use in

    children

    Given that the vast majority of children with asymptomaticTB are successfully treated with INH alone - ? Is EMB

    necessary

    I have been involved in treatment of three children with INH

    resistant TB who failed INH, RIF, PZA

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    23/36

    Pediatric treatment - ethambutol (EMB)

    Ocular toxicity 40% of adults at 50 mg/kg/dose

    0-3% of adults at 15 mg/kg/dose

    No well documented cases in children

    2 of 3800 children stopped EMB with possible toxicity

    Mean peaks markedly lower in children

    Doses of at least 20 mg/kg/dose needed

    Donald Int J Tuberc Lung Dis10:1318-1330 2006

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    24/36

    Pediatric treatment pyrazinamide (PZA

    Children have lower levels of PZA compared to adults

    ATS dose 15 30 mg/kg/day 50 mg/kg/ biw

    WHO 20 30 mg/kg/day 35 mg/kg/tiw

    AAP 20 40 mg/kg/day 50 mg/kg/biw or tiw

    I suggest AAP dose

    Graham Antimic Agents Chemoth 2006 50:407-13

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    25/36

    Pediatric treatment - PK

    Isoniazid Studies show that many children require higher doses of

    INH to reach 2 3 mcg/ml Young children require more than older

    Fast acetylators in particular at risk

    WHO recommends 5 mg/kg

    AAP / ATS dose of 10 15 mg/kg probably better

    Schaaf Arch Dis Child 2005;90:614-8

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    26/36

    PK - levofloxacin

    Fluoroquinolones not used widely in children due toarthropathy observed in puppy models

    Large survey of 2500 participants of efficacy trialsshowed rates of musculoskeletal complaints 2.1% vs.0.9% for comparators (p 5 years of age Levofloxacin available IV; tabs: 250, 500, 750 mg and

    suspension: 25 mg/ml

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    27/36

    Please paste in

    Francis J. Curry National Tuberculosis Center , 2008: Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Survival Guide for Clinicians,

    Figure 1, Page 35 www.nationaltbcenter.edu/drtb Second Edition

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    28/36

    Largest series of 38 children with MDR-TB in Peru

    Children received 5-7 drugs to which theisolate was susceptible (includinginjectables and fluoroquinolones)

    Minimum of 18 - 24mo (12 mo. Cx neg)

    94% cure

    MDR-TBResistance to at least INH & RIF

    Drobac Pediatrics 2006;17:2022-9

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    29/36

    South African experience 36 child contacts to MDR tx for disease

    Treatment was mostly oral

    4 5 drugs

    6 months for isolated LAD; most 9 12 months

    Severe disease 12 months from cultureconversion

    10% death; 15% default

    Schaaf Arch Dis Child 203;88: 1106-11

    MDR-TB

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    30/36

    New York experience Extensive disease treated for 18 24 mo

    Modest / asymptomatic disease 12 months LTBI treated with two drugs to which the

    isolate was susceptible no breakthroughcases (no fluoroquinolones)

    MDR-TB & MDR-LTBI

    Steiner P Unpublished data

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    31/36

    New York experience 1995 - 2003 20 children with MDR-TB

    Average 4.4 drugs for mean 18.8 months 45% treated without an injectable drug

    40% treated without a fluoroquinolone One died shortly after starting therapy

    MDR-TB

    Feja PIDJ 2008;27: 907912

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    32/36

    New York experience 1995 - 2003

    51 children with MDR-LTBI

    2-7 drugs used (avg 3 drugs) mean 10.3mos

    88% COT for children treated in chestclinic compared to 22% not

    MDR-LTBI

    Feja PIDJ 2008;27: 907912

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    33/36

    South African contacts of MDR-TB TB disease on 20% of untreated children

    TB disease in 5% of children tx with 2 drugs

    MDR-LTBI

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    34/36

    No studied regimens Most experts recommend using adult type regimens for

    TB disease

    MDR-LTBI treatment controversial

    Given lack of data, many recommend treating only

    high risk contacts (conversions, youngest children)

    If treating I suggest fluoroquinolone and a second

    drug to which the isolate is susceptible (PZA, EMB,

    ETH)

    Pediatric MDR and MDR-LTBI

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    35/36

    Children are the unreached in many parts of theworld as their early, asymptomatic and not

    contagious disease does not get the attention of

    the public health machinery

    Their identification offers an opportunity to find

    and treat a contagious source case

    Conclusions

  • 7/21/2019 Pediatric Tuberculosis

    36/36

    Unresolved clinical issues include: the difficulty in determining who has true

    disease requiring multi-drug treatment vs. who

    will control their infection

    Difficulty in confirming disease bacteriologically

    and confirming drug-susceptibility Optimal doses and regimens for drug

    susceptible and drug resistant disease

    Conclusions