peer review publication: why not me - tsicp · •read all thoroughly & highlight key items...
TRANSCRIPT
Peer Review Publication:Why Not Me ?
42nd Annual TSICP Conference
Patti Grant, RN, BSN, MS, CIC, FAPIC
Methodist Hospital fur Surgery: Infection Preventionist / ISO Lead Audit
OBJECTIVES
• State Basic Questions & Premise Behind the Peer-Review Publication Process
• Describe Resources Available to Use (Generic Yet Mandatory Guide)
• Explain Basic Organizational Steps from Idea to Submission, Re-Write, and Final
… Not About Writing or Scientific Process …
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
BASIC QUESTION
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
BASIC ANSWER
Of Being an Author of a Peer-Review Publication
(Thank You Very Much)
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
…. But Seriously … WHY?
• To Give Back
• Mentors who shared their time, experience, and expertise … expect nothing in return
• To help colleagues avoid “Reinventing that darn Wheel”
• Personal Glory … Do Not Expect It
• Yet your reputation is ‘On The Line’
• Your professional life is forever altered
• Feeling of “actualization” professionally
• Because You Can and It Is Awesome
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Aside From Textbooks …Types of “Scientific” Publications
• Newsletters
• Magazines
• Trade Journals
• Vanity Publications
• Peer-Review … Is THE Gold Standard
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Peer Review Publication
• Not Just Semantics• Peer Review = Editorial Review Board
• Magazine = Advisory Panels (or Nothing)
• Newsletters = Editorial Advisory Boards
• Abstract vs. Full-Length Article• Abstract not ‘scrutinized’ yet important … can be referenced
but does not hold as much weight
• Full length article ‘must pass muster’ • Can be referenced and holds much weight
• Published Does Not Equal Truth• Must learn ‘good vs. not so good research’
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Getting Started: Questions & Roadmap
• Who Is Your Audience? Query Editor?
• Do Your Homework• Go to library and review various journals
• Journal Style? Reference Type? Etc.
• Advance Schedule of Topics?
• Information for Authors on-line? Hard-Copy?
• Snail Mail vs. Electronic Submission?
• Each Publication is Unique to Itself• Doing Your Homework Pays Off
• Increases Chances of Publication
• Example: AJIC Author Information
http://journals.elsevierhealth.com/periodicals/ymic/authorinfo
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Author Information Gives “Nitty Gritty” Details
→Avoid Obvious Manuscript Rejection
-- Word Count
-- Check-Lists
-- # Tables
-- # References
-- Spacing Rules
-- Graphic Rules
-- Software
-- Article Type(s)
-- Key Words ?
-- Abstract Type
-- Max # Pages
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Rock Solid Truth: Easy
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Overall Peer-Review Concepts
• Solid Reference Material →Problems
•Defuse Defensiveness
•Rigorous Scientific Process
• Ethics Galore
• IT TAKES A VILLAGE
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Resources• Start At The Beginning: IRB Needed?
• Institutional Review Board (IRB)
• Any type of human research: approval
• Informed Consent needed? … Present Study
• Qualify for Expedited Review? Exempt?
• Informed Consent vs. Expedited Review
• Regardless: Must earn ‘certificate’ to participate in research: self-paced & on-line → NIH no longer “free” as of 9/26/18
• Primary Investigator and all co-investigator’s of research
http://phrp.nihtraining.com/users/login.php
• Must mention IRB approval/exemption unless “PI” pure
• https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/guidance/faq/quality-improvement-activities/index.html
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
The Resource for Medical PR Journals
• ICMJE: International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
• Short History of ICMJE
• Originated in 1978 as “Vancouver Group” of biomedical journal editors to begin standardization requirements of publication
• By 1981 established ICMJE and published first uniform requirements … still called
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts (URM) Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing & Editing for Biomedical Publication
• Look in Journal “Author Information” • Actual Journal or Publisher of Journal
• Are these requirements are referenced … if so, increases creditability of publication
• If not referenced? This is still your peer-review roadmap
• Wealth of Gold Standard Information• FAQ’s
• List of Journals that follow URM
http://www.icmje.org/
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Plan Ahead: Some Fine Points• Internal P&P for “Permission”
• Check for internal facility requirements
• Authorship• Follow The Guidelines of order & contribution
• Data collection & entry alone not enough
• Authorship vs. Acknowledgement
• Conflict of Interest• Author Information
• Using Copy Right Material
• Signed Statement (Disclosure)
• Ethics: For All Aspects of Publication• Publish Same Data Only Once
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Good Ethics … Avoid Pitfalls
• Ingelfinger Rule originated with NEJM co-editor in chief 1969
• Single journal submission or publication
• Posters/Abstracts ≠ Previous Publication
• Self-Plagiarism is duplicate publication without full disclosure
• Might actually violate copyright laws
• Clutter literature databases, waste time
• “Artificially” inflates topic importance
• Plagiarism is as obvious as always
• Salami Publications: Be able to defend
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Reference Database Software
• Compatible with journal publisher
specifications in “Authors Info” ?
• Various Programs Available: University of Toronto w/good chart https://guides.library.utoronto.ca/c.php?g=250610&p=1671260
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
References Are Sticklers• Always Cite “First” Reference
• Go to the original article first referenced
• Cross Reference & Double-Check To Text
• Must be in order and style of journal
• APA (American Psychological Association) → alpha style
• Vancouver Style → number style
• ICMJE URM → Uniform Requirements Manuscripts
• Sample References → 44 Types
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
More Reference Sticklers
• How Do I Know “THE” Journal Abbreviation to Cite?
• American Journal of Infection Control … Am J Infect Control
• American Journal of Nursing … Am J Nurs
• Inexperienced Option
• Permission to Laugh … I did this the first time ☺
• Go to other articles
• Look for the journal in the reference section of their articles
• Until you see find what you are looking for
• Then copy it or write it down
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Experienced Option #1
• Go to the internet • Cumulated Index Medicus (simple alpha)
• Bibliographic list of references to biomedical journals worldwide
http://www2.bg.am.poznan.pl/czasopisma/medicus.php?lang=eng
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Experienced Option #2
• Go to the internet • NCBI: http://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=journals
• NML Catalogue & use the drop-down menu to PubMed
• Type in the journal name and click SEARCH
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
User-Friendly:Ethics & General Guide
Am J Infect Control 1999;27:35-46. P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Basic Organizational Steps
• IRB Approval? • Full Monty?
• Expedited?
• Exempt?
• Process Improvement (not research)?
• Internal Organization P&P Required?
• Authorship Determined?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Conduct Literature Search First:Painful But Necessary
• The “Reference Shuffle” (Home Grown)• Conduct your search & scan abstracts
• Get full articles of those that match your paper
• Read all thoroughly & highlight key items
• Alphabetize Articles by Author … Then• Write a symbol or color code each article based on main topic as
relates to your paper, then
• Create a personal informal reference list that is alphabetical and includes your ‘code system’
• Write 1-4 sentence summary for each article
• As You Use A Reference In Your Paper• In pencil write the number as it appears in text
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Start Writing (REALLY)
• A Title Isn’t Just a Title … Ever
• Make 100% Descriptive
• First “Glance” for literature searches
• Describes generic external generalizability
• Keep It Less Than 21 Words
• Will Change “Ump-Teen” Times
• Ask for opinions
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Keep Your Readers “In Mind”
• While writing anticipate other perceptions
• “Shadowbox” Your Readers *
• Are there any gaps?
• Any potential contradictions?
• DRAFT: Keep a notepad or add footnotes
• Write down gaps or contradictions
• Do not misplace these concepts
• DRAFT → Final Submission
* Am J Infect Control 1999;27:35-46.
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Abstract … Your Next Foot
• Needs to Stand Alone*
• Make Every Word Meaningful – Limited
• Follow ‘Author Info’ for format required
• Scientific Format (B →M → R → C)
• Summary Format (Review, Educational, etc.)
• Write First vs. Write Last
• Critical to be succinct and informative
• Must follow exactly progression of paper
• Launching Pad: Presentations …
* Am J Infect Control 1999;27:35-46
* Nyla J, Norman VL. Writing an effective abstract. Appl Nurs Res 1989;2:189-91
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Keep Sections Pure: Isolated Yet Connected
• Introduction
• Methods
• Results
• Discussion
• Conclusion
P.Grant TSICP 2019 / Austin TX
INTRODUCTION
• Get To The Point Quickly: Uniqueness
• Remember “SO WHAT” (Rationale)
• Capture Interest … Originality• What Your Paper Is, or,
• What Your Paper is not
• Logical Progression of Ideas → Focus
• Sparse ROL (Minimal References)
• Sets Track for Progression of Paper
• Cross-Check Once Paper Finalized
• Keep Asking Yourself:• Does This Belong Here?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
METHODS:Publication Recipe• Tells “How” of The Situation at Hand
• Can Someone Duplicate Your Study?• Setting? Subjects? Study Design? IRB?
• Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria
• Step by Step Process Involved
• Statistical Analysis
• Questionnaires/Tools Used?
• Validation? Inter-rater Reliability? Prior Reference?
• Multiple Sub-Sections Common
• Do these details support research findings?
• Keep Asking Yourself:• Does This Belong Here?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
RESULTS: Just The Facts Jack
• Facts Only: Absolutely No Discussion
• Logical Order: Mirror Previous Sections
• Accurate … Cross … Perfection
• Include All Finds (Not Just “Wanted”)
• Tables, Graphs, and Figures
• Do not repeat in narrative
• Emphasize only key findings
• Statistics in these match narrative?
• Keep Asking Yourself:
• Does This Belong Here?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
DISCUSSION:No Hallucinogens Please
• Logical Order: Mirror Previous Sections
• Dr. Elaine Larson, Editor of AJIC:• “Leap of Faith -- Cautious Latitude of Findings”
• Can Speculate on Results w/out Repeating
• Get Creative with References• Intertwine with your findings: Implications
• Similarities? Differences? Unexpected Findings?
• Can be reference heavy as appropriate (if adds to paper)
• Address Limitations in Detail: Proactive
• Future Research Suggestions Based on Findings?
• Keep Asking Yourself:• Does This Belong Here?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
CONCLUSION
• Don’t PROVE Anything → Correlate
• Key Findings = Abstract … Sort Of
• As hinted at in INTRODUCITON?
• As stated in RESULTS section?
• Words Count: “Can” vs. “May” vs. “Could”
• Application of Findings
• Contribution to Knowledge Base?
• Caution: Findings of This Population Only
• Keep Asking Yourself:
• Does This Belong Here?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Known Pearls: Stating The Obvious
• 1st Time: Abbreviations & Acronyms
• Tables: Stand Alone? Accurate?
• Titles are extremely important
• Abbreviations, Acronyms, Key
• Identical to Anything Quoted in Text?
• Columns & Rows labeled correctly?
• No Discrepancies to any part of manuscript?
• Do these match order referenced in text?
• References
• Spelled Correctly? Format? Correct Order?
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Now it is time …
•Submit The Manuscript
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Submission Process
• Not “Really Done” … Your Final Draft
• Do Not Get Rejected for Carelessness
• Follow All Author Information
• Word-processing
• Tables, Graphs, Figures
• Journal & Reference Style/Requirements
• Check-List (Use it)
• Wait For The Outcome
• Rejected?
• Accepted with minor or major revisions
• Accepted without revisions (rare)
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Review Process
• Blind vs. Open Review Process
• Must Address All Questions/Concerns
• Logical Approach
• Order of Reviewers Comments
• Respond … Must not accept all suggestions
• Yes
• No – Rationale Must Be Provided
• N/A
• Table Format is Best
• Might Be Last Shot Before Rejection
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
The End?Rejection & Acceptance
• REJECTION
• You are smarter on topic at hand ☺
• Worth it to look for another PR journal?
• Lessons Learned?
• Study Reviewers Comments in Detail
• Take paper to newsletter? Magazine? Etc.
• ACCEPTANCE
• Don’t drink too much at the party
• Don’t quit your day job
• Review Galley Proofs very carefully
• Often “Corrected Proof” published 1st on-line
• May take several attempts
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX
Patti Grant, RN, BSN, MS, CIC, FAPIC
Methodist Hospital fur Surgery: Infection Preventionist / ISO Lead Audit
P.G
ran
t T
SIC
P 2
01
9 / A
ustin
TX