peer transportation systems research program
TRANSCRIPT
Quantification of variation in seismic response of bridges with
seat-type abutments to shear key modeling technique
PEER Transportation Systems Research Program Principal Investigator: Farzin Zareian, UC Irvine
Student Investigators: Bahareh Mobasher, UC Irvine, Peyman Kaviani,UC Irvine
University of California, Irvine
Objective Shear key Models
Conclusion • Deck Rotation in bridge is sensitive to employed exterior shear
key modeling technique and strength, and abutment skew
angle.
• Probability of shear key failure in the bridge with strut and tie
shear key model is smaller than sacrificial shear key model
for all skew angles
Evaluate effects of two
different exterior shear key
modeling techniques on
bridge response
Development of the sacrificial shear key
model using Concrete 02
Development of the shear key
model using bilinear material
based on Strut and Tie failure
mechanism
Record deck rotation and number of
shear key failures for each modeling
technique
Strut and Tie Shear Key Failure Strut and Tie failure
Test Observation of strut and Tie failure mechanism (Megally et
al.,2001. Bozorgzadeh et al. 2004)
Bridge Properties
Results
Concrete02
Model2(Sacrificial)
Concrete02
Angle μ(Strut and tie) σ(Strut and tie) μ(Sacrificial) σ(Sacrificial)
0 0.305 0.546 1.269 3.798
30 1.354 3.031 1.829 2.774
60 1.954 3.399 1.905 3.340
0
2
4
6
8 Bilinear Concrete02
0' 30' 60'
Skew Angle
Dec
k r
ota
tio
n (
Rad
.)
ENT
EPPG Bilinear
Bilinear
Model1(Strut and Tie)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
0 2 4 6
Displacement(in)
Forc
e(K
ips)
0 1 2 3 4 5 60
200
400
600
800
1000
Displacement(in)
Forc
e(K
ips)
Bridge A
Bridge Type Skewed
Length of Span 220.6ft
Number of Spans
2
Column Height 220ft
Column Type Single
Column
Abutment Type Seat Abut.
Sacrificial Strut and Tie
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 10
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
PGA(g)
Prob
abili
ty o
f she
ar k
ey fa
ilure
0' Strut and Tie
30' Strut and Tie
60' Strut and Tie
0' Sacrificial
30' Sacrificial
60' Sacrificial