penn state - institutional review board - open 2011
TRANSCRIPT
Ethical Challenges in Research with Developing Communities
Humanitarian Engineering & Social Entrepreneurship (HESE) Program
The Pennsylvania State University
Carey Bell Rachel Dzombak Tara Sulewski Khanjan Mehta
Road Map
• Current Ventures • Importance of ‘Research’• The Institutional Review Board (IRB)• Challenges Faced & Lessons Learned
1. Navigating the IRB process2. Conducting study in Kenya3. Larger Conflicts and Challenges
HESE @ Penn StateTeaching
• 13-credit ECE Certificate
• Fall semester:• Sensor and Controller System
Integration• Social Entrepreneurship
• Spring semester:• Projects in Community
Service Engineering• Design for Developing
Communities
Research• IJSLE: HESE
• eplum Assessment• Systems Thinking• Cultural Anthropology• Social networks, trust
and cellphones• Indigenous Knowledge
Systems and Sticky Info• Design Space Exploration• Changing the
Conversation• Global Jugaad Commons
Engagement• Mashavu• WishVast• Essential Design• iSPACES• HESE - India
• Invention 2 Venture Conference
• Milking the Rhino: ISS• Kochia Chronicles• AcademIK Connections• *K-12(Center for
Science in the Schools)
the ventures
ED
SG
N 4
52
||
Secti
on
1
ESSENTIAL DESIGNRenewable Energy Solar Driers Anaerobic Digesters
Wastewater Management Water Filtration Systems
Briquetting Machines Water Well Drilling Rigs
ED
SG
N 4
52
||
Secti
on
2
Mashavu: Networked Health Solutions for the Developing World
234 Students + 5 Faculty 40 Majors & Ten colleges
WishVastBuilding Trust and Social Capital using Cell Phones
Beta-tested in Kenya; Pilot Testing in South Africa
ED
SG
N 4
52
||
Secti
on
3
iSPACES: Rethinking Science Education in Tanzania
Bachelors of Education (Science) Degree
Science, Systems and Entrepreneurship
ED
SG
N 4
52
||
Secti
on
4
Project Prerana + MpowerICT Solutions for Women’s Education
Affordable Technologies for Maternal Health
ED
SG
N 4
52
||
Secti
on
5
Fieldwork: Real; Rigorous; Intense
23P; 6R; 9M; 5D; 12N
Applied Science, Designs,Methodologies, Curricular ModelsLessons Learned & Resources
Research Emphasis
Why Research?
• Anecdotal vs. (in)Credible Research• Increased Academic Rigor• Enhanced Résumés• Building a body of knowledge
Institutional Review Board
1932
1947 1974National
Research Act
1930 2011
Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Nuremburg Trials
1964
Declaration of Helsinki
Institutional Review Board
• Review and Approve ‘research’ involving human participation• Operates independently in compliance with Federal Regulations
Exempt Expedited Full Review
Navigating the IRB
Minimal RiskExpedited(3 weeks)
LocationLocal
Approval
Collaboration Letters
Recruitment Script
Detailed Protocol
Data Storage &
Disposal
FDA Approval
Informed Consent
FormPhotos
Benefits of IRB
Standardization; Rigor; Peace of Mind
Critiques of IRB
Biomedical Res; Time constraints; Simplification
Research in Developing Communities
Chaotic;
Chaotic; Dynamic;
Research in Developing Communities
Chaotic; Dynamic; Unfamiliar
Research in Developing Communities
Countdown: Lessons Learned
98765
43210
Preparing Protocol
START EARLY!!!
10: Kumi
Preparing Protocol
Be concise; Meet Face to Face; Get Letters
9: Tisa
Preparing Protocol8: Nane
Risk Management: What if???
Hakuna Matata
Recruitment and Consent
7: Saba
Hakuna Matata
Language Barrier
6: Sita
Hakuna Matata
Research Participation Incentives
5: Tano
Hakuna Matata
Involvement Criteria
4: Nne
Non-medical student Engagement
3: TatuHakuna Matata
Larger Conflicts
Research on a shoestring budget
2: Mbili
Larger Conflicts1: Moja
“Hit and Run” Research Ethical?
Larger Conflicts
Chaos of Eship (in Africa) vs. Discipline of Research
0: Sifuri
Appropriate & Rigorous Research and Design to
Build Multi-Million Smile Enterprises