penn v. richie 480 u.s. 39

Upload: thalia-sanders

Post on 30-May-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    1/29

    Supreme Court of the United States

    PENNSYLVANIA, Petitioner

    v.

    George F. RITCHIE.

    No. 85-1347.

    Argued Dec. 3, 1986.

    Decided Feb. 24, 1987.

    Defendant was convicted before the Court of Com-

    mon Pleas, Criminal Division, No. CC7903887A,

    Allegheny County, of rape, involuntary sexual in-

    tercourse, incest, and corruption of minor, and de-

    fendant appealed. The Superior Court, No. 137 Pitt-

    sburgh 1981, 324 Pa.Super. 557, 472 A.2d 220, va-

    cated and remanded for further proceedings. The

    Commonwealth appealed. The Supreme Court of

    Pennsylvania, No. 69 W.D. Appeal Docket 1984,

    McDermott, J., 509 Pa. 357, 502 A.2d 148, re-

    manded. State sought writ of certiorari. The Su-

    preme Court, Justice Powell, held that: (1) defend-

    ant was entitled to have Pennsylvania Children and

    Youth Services file reviewed by trial court to de-

    termine whether it contained information that prob-

    ably would have changed outcome of trial, and (2)

    defense counsel was not entitled to examine confid-

    ential information in Children and Youth Services

    file. Furthermore, Justice Powell, with the Chief

    Justice and two other Justices concurring, and one

    Justice concurring in result, held that failure to dis-

    close Children and Youth Services file did not viol-

    ate the confrontation clause.

    Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for

    further proceedings.

    Justice Blackmun filed opinion concurring in part

    and concurring in judgment.

    Justice Brennan, with whom Justice Marshall

    joined, filed dissenting opinion.

    Justice Stevens, with whom Justices Brennan, Mar-

    shall, and Scalia, joined, filed dissenting opinion.

    West Headnotes

    [1] Federal Courts 170B 503

    170B Federal Courts

    170BVII Supreme Court

    170BVII(E) Review of Decisions of State

    Courts

    170Bk503 k. Finality of Determination.

    Most Cited Cases

    Normally, finality doctrine contained in statute

    governing Supreme Court review of decision of

    highest court of state is not satisfied if state court

    still must conduct further substantive proceedings

    before rights of parties as to federal issues are re-

    solved. 28 U.S.C.A. 1257(3).

    [2] Federal Courts 170B 503

    170B Federal Courts

    170BVII Supreme Court

    170BVII(E) Review of Decisions of State

    Courts

    170Bk503 k. Finality of Determination.

    Most Cited CasesAlthough Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to

    review interlocutory judgment, jurisdiction is prop-

    er where federal claim has been finally decided,

    with further proceedings on merits in state court to

    come, but in which later review of federal issue

    could not be had whatever ultimate outcome of

    case. 28 U.S.C.A. 1257(3).

    [3] Courts 106 99(1)

    106 Courts

    106II Establishment, Organization, and Proced-ure

    106II(G) Rules of Decision

    106k99 Previous Decisions in Same Case

    as Law of the Case

    106k99(1) k. In General. Most Cited

    Cases

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 1

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1984108864http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1985160104http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106IIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106II%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106II%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106k99http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106k99%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=106k99%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=106k99%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=106k99%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=106k99%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106k99%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106k99http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106II%28G%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106IIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=106http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk503http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1985160104http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1984108864
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    2/29

    Law of case principles are not bar to Supreme

    Court's jurisdiction.

    [4] Federal Courts 170B 506

    170B Federal Courts

    170BVII Supreme Court

    170BVII(E) Review of Decisions of State

    Courts

    170Bk504 Nature of Decisions or Ques-

    tions Involved

    170Bk506 k. Criminal Matters; Habeas

    Corpus. Most Cited Cases

    Existence of several proceedings in Pennsylvania

    courts did not preclude review of issue concerning

    extent to which State's interest in confidentiality of

    its investigative files concerning child abuse must

    yield to criminal defendant's Sixth and Fourteenth

    Amendment right to discover favorable evidence,

    where Sixth Amendment issue had been finally de-

    cided by highest court of Pennsylvania, and unless

    Supreme Court reviewed decision, harm that State

    sought to avoid, the disclosure of confidential files,

    would occur regardless of result on remand.

    U.S.C.A. Const.Amends. 6, 14; 28 U.S.C.A. 1257

    (3).

    [5] Criminal Law 110 662.1

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    110k662.1 k. In General. Most Cited

    Cases

    Criminal Law 110 662.7

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    110k662.7 k. Cross-Examination and

    Impeachment. Most Cited Cases

    Confrontation clause provides two types of protec-

    tion for criminal defendant: right physically to face

    those who testify against him, and right to conduct

    cross-examination. (Per Justice Powell, with the

    Chief Justice and two Justices concurring and one

    Justice concurring in result.) U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 6.

    [6] Witnesses 410 372(1)

    410 Witnesses

    410IV Credibility and Impeachment

    410IV(C) Interest and Bias of Witness

    410k372 Cross-Examination to Show In-

    terest or Bias

    410k372(1) k. In General. Most Cited

    Cases

    Right to cross-examine includes opportunity to

    show that witness is biased, or that testimony is ex-

    aggerated or unbelievable. (Per Justice Powell, with

    Chief Justice and two Justices concurring and one

    Justice concurring in result.) U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 6.

    [7] Criminal Law 110 662.4

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    110k662.4 k. Failure to Produce or

    Disclose Witnesses or Evidence. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 110k662.1)

    Confrontation clause is not constitutionally com-

    pelled rule of pretrial discovery. (Per Justice Pow-

    ell, with Chief Justice and two Justices concurring

    and one Justice concurring in result.) U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 6.

    [8] Criminal Law 110 662.7

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 2

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk504http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk506http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk506http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410IVhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410IV%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410IV%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k372http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k372%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k372%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k372%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k372%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k372%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k372%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k372http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410IV%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410IVhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=170Bk506http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk506http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170Bk504http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVII%28E%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170BVIIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=170B
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    3/29

    Witnesses

    110k662.7 k. Cross-Examination and

    Impeachment. Most Cited Cases

    Right of confrontation is trial right, designed to pre-

    vent improper restrictions on types of questions that

    defense counsel may ask during cross-examination.

    (Per Justice Powell, with Chief Justice and two

    Justices concurring and one Justice concurring in

    result.) U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 6.

    [9] Criminal Law 110 627.6(1)

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(A) Preliminary Proceedings

    110k627.5 Discovery Prior to and Incid-

    ent to Trial

    110k627.6 Information or Things, Dis-

    closure of

    110k627.6(1) k. In General. Most

    Cited Cases

    Criminal Law 110 1999

    110 Criminal Law

    110XXXI Counsel

    110XXXI(D) Duties and Obligations of Pro-

    secuting Attorneys

    110XXXI(D)2 Disclosure of Information

    110k1993 Particular Types of Informa-

    tion Subject to Disclosure

    110k1999 k. Impeaching Evidence.

    Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 110k700(2.1), 110k700(2))

    Ability to question adverse witnesses does not in-

    clude power to require pretrial disclosure of any

    and all information that might be useful in contra-

    dicting unfavorable testimony. (Per Justice Powell,

    with Chief Justice and two Justices concurring and

    one Justice concurring in result.) U.S.C.A.Const.Amend. 6.

    [10] Criminal Law 110 662.1

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    110k662.1 k. In General. Most Cited

    Cases

    Criminal Law 110 662.7

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    110k662.7 k. Cross-Examination and

    Impeachment. Most Cited Cases

    Normally right to confront one's accusers is satis-

    fied if defense counsel receives wide latitude at tri-

    al to question witnesses. (Per Justice Powell, with

    Chief Justice and two Justices concurring and one

    Justice concurring in result.) U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 6.

    [11] Criminal Law 110 662.7

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    110k662.7 k. Cross-Examination and

    Impeachment. Most Cited Cases

    Confrontation clause only guarantees opportunity

    for effective cross-examination, not cross-

    examination that is effective in whatever way, and

    to whatever extent, defense might wish. (Per Justice

    Powell, with Chief Justice and two Justices concur-

    ring and one Justice concurring in result.) U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 6.

    [12] Criminal Law 110 662.4

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(C) Reception of Evidence

    110k662 Right of Accused to Confront

    Witnesses

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 3

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1993http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1999http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k1999http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.1http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28C%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k1999http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1999http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1993http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.7http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.7
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    4/29

    110k662.4 k. Failure to Produce or

    Disclose Witnesses or Evidence. Most Cited Cases

    Confrontation clause was not violated by withhold-

    ing Pennsylvania Children and Youth Services'

    child abuse investigative file from defendant; de-

    fense counsel was able to cross-examine all trial

    witnesses fully. (Per Justice Powell, with Chief

    Justice and two Justices concurring and one Justice

    concurring in result.) U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 6.

    [13] Witnesses 410 2(1)

    410 Witnesses

    410I In General

    410k2 Right of Accused to Compulsory Pro-

    cess

    410k2(1) k. In General. Most Cited Cases

    Criminal defendants have right under compulsory

    process clause to government's assistance in com-

    pelling attendance of favorable witnesses at trial

    and right to put before jury evidence that might in-

    fluence determination of guilt. U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 6.

    [14] Witnesses 410 2(1)

    410 Witnesses

    410I In General

    410k2 Right of Accused to Compulsory Pro-

    cess

    410k2(1) k. In General. Most Cited Cases

    Sixth Amendment compulsory process provides no

    greater protection in areas governing defendant's

    right to discover identity of witnesses, or to require

    government to produce exculpatory evidence, than

    protections afforded by due process. U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amends. 6, 14.

    [15] Criminal Law 110 1992

    110 Criminal Law

    110XXXI Counsel

    110XXXI(D) Duties and Obligations of Pro-

    secuting Attorneys

    110XXXI(D)2 Disclosure of Information

    110k1992 k. Materiality and Probable

    Effect of Information in General. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 110k700(2.1), 110k700(2))

    Government has obligation to turn over evidence in

    its possession that is both favorable to accused and

    material to guilt or punishment. U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amends. 5, 14.

    [16] Criminal Law 110 1992

    110 Criminal Law

    110XXXI Counsel

    110XXXI(D) Duties and Obligations of Pro-

    secuting Attorneys

    110XXXI(D)2 Disclosure of Information

    110k1992 k. Materiality and Probable

    Effect of Information in General. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 110k700(2.1), 110k700(2))

    Evidence is material to guilt or punishment only if

    there is reasonable probability that, had evidence

    been disclosed to defense, result of proceeding

    would have been different.

    [17] Privileged Communications and Confidenti-

    ality 311H 376

    311H Privileged Communications and Confidenti-

    ality

    311HVI Public Officers and Records

    311Hk376 k. Juvenile Records. Most Cited

    Cases

    (Formerly 110k627.5(6))

    Public interest in protecting sensitive information

    such as that in Pennsylvania Children and Youth

    Services child abuse records does not necessarily

    prevent disclosure in all circumstances.

    [18] Criminal Law 110 627.8(4)

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(A) Preliminary Proceedings

    110k627.5 Discovery Prior to and Incid-

    ent to Trial

    110k627.8 Proceedings to Obtain Dis-

    closure

    110k627.8(4) k. Examination by

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 4

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311HVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311HVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k1992http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2%281%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410k2http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410Ihttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=410http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDVI&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k662.4http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k662.4
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    5/29

    Court; Inspection in Camera. Most Cited Cases

    Criminal Law 110 914

    110 Criminal Law110XXI Motions for New Trial

    110k914 k. Errors and Irregularities in Pre-

    liminary Proceedings. Most Cited Cases

    Privileged Communications and Confidentiality

    311H 376

    311H Privileged Communications and Confidenti-

    ality

    311HVI Public Officers and Records

    311Hk376 k. Juvenile Records. Most Cited

    Cases(Formerly 110k627.5(6))

    Defendant charged with child abuse was entitled to

    have Pennsylvania Children and Youth Services file

    reviewed by trial court to determine whether file

    contained information that probably would have

    changed outcome of his trial; furthermore, if file

    did contain such information, defendant was en-

    titled to new trial, but, if records contained no such

    information, or if nondisclosure was harmless bey-

    ond reasonable doubt, lower court would be free to

    reinstate prior conviction. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend.

    14.

    [19] Criminal Law 110 627.6(2)

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(A) Preliminary Proceedings

    110k627.5 Discovery Prior to and Incid-

    ent to Trial

    110k627.6 Information or Things, Dis-

    closure of

    110k627.6(2) k. Documents or Tan-

    gible Objects. Most Cited Cases

    Criminal Law 110 627.6(6)

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(A) Preliminary Proceedings

    110k627.5 Discovery Prior to and Incid-

    ent to Trial

    110k627.6 Information or Things, Dis-

    closure of

    110k627.6(6) k. Records. Most

    Cited Cases

    Defendant's right to discover exculpatory evidence

    does not include unsupervised authority to search

    through Commonwealth's files and make determin-

    ation as to materiality of information. U.S.C.A.

    Const.Amend. 14.

    [20] Criminal Law 110 627.8(4)

    110 Criminal Law

    110XX Trial

    110XX(A) Preliminary Proceedings

    110k627.5 Discovery Prior to and Incid-

    ent to Trial

    110k627.8 Proceedings to Obtain Dis-

    closure

    110k627.8(4) k. Examination by

    Court; Inspection in Camera. Most Cited Cases

    Privileged Communications and Confidentiality

    311H 376

    311H Privileged Communications and Confidenti-

    ality

    311HVI Public Officers and Records

    311Hk376 k. Juvenile Records. Most Cited

    Cases

    (Formerly 110k627.5(6))

    Interest of defendant charged with child abuse, as

    well as that of Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in

    insuring fair trial could be fully protected by requir-

    ing that Pennsylvania Children and Youth Services

    child abuse file be submitted only to trial court for

    in camera review; to allow full disclosure to de-

    fense counsel of file would sacrifice unnecessarilyCommonwealth's compelling interest of protecting

    child abuse information.

    [21] Criminal Law 110 2007

    110 Criminal Law

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 5

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k914http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k914http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k914http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311HVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6%286%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%286%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%286%29http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311HVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311HVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8%284%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.8http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%286%29http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%286%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6%286%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.6%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6%282%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.6http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k627.5http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XX%28A%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=USCOAMENDXIV&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hk376http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311HVIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=311Hhttp://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k914http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k914http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k627.8%284%29
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    6/29

    110XXXI Counsel

    110XXXI(D) Duties and Obligations of Pro-

    secuting Attorneys

    110XXXI(D)2 Disclosure of Information

    110k2007 k. Time and Manner of Re-

    quired Disclosure. Most Cited Cases

    (Formerly 110k700(2.1), 110k700(5),

    110k700(2))

    Duty to disclose exculpatory information is ongo-

    ing.

    *39 **991 SyllabusFN*

    FN* The syllabus constitutes no part of the

    opinion of the Court but has been prepared

    by the Reporter of Decisions for the con-

    venience of the reader. See United States v.

    Detroit Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337, 26

    S.Ct. 282, 287, 50 L.Ed. 499.

    Respondent was charged with various sexual of-

    fenses against his minor daughter. The matter was

    referred to the Children and Youth Services (CYS),

    a protective service agency established by

    Pennsylvania to investigate cases of suspected child

    mistreatment and neglect. During pretrial discov-

    ery, respondent served CYS with a subpoena, seek-

    ing access to the records related to the immediatecharges, as well as certain earlier records compiled

    when CYS investigated a separate report that re-

    spondent's children were being abused. CYS re-

    fused to comply with the subpoena, claiming that

    the records were privileged under a Pennsylvania

    statute which provides that all CYS records must be

    kept confidential, subject to specified exceptions.

    One of the exceptions is that **992 CYS may dis-

    close reports to a court of competent jurisdiction

    pursuant to a court order. At an in-chambers hear-

    ing in the trial court, respondent argued that he was

    entitled to the information because the CYS filemight contain the names of favorable witnesses, as

    well as other, unspecified exculpatory evidence. Al-

    though the trial judge did not examine the entire

    CYS file, he refused to order disclosure. At the tri-

    al, which resulted in respondent's conviction by a

    jury, the main witness against him was his daugh-

    ter, who was cross-examined at length by defense

    counsel. On appeal, the Pennsylvania Superior

    Court held that the failure to disclose the daughter's

    statements contained in the CYS file violated the

    Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment. The

    court vacated the conviction and remanded for fur-

    ther proceedings to determine whether a new trial

    should be granted. On the State's appeal, the

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that, by denying

    access to the CYS file, the trial court order had vi-

    olated both the Confrontation and the Compulsory

    Process Clauses of the Sixth Amendment, and that

    the conviction must be vacated and the case re-

    manded to determine if a new trial was necessary.

    The court concluded that defense counsel was en-

    titled to review the entire file for any useful evid-ence.

    Held: The judgment is affirmed in part and re-

    versed in part, and the case is remanded.

    509 Pa. 357, 502 A.2d 148 (1985), affirmed in part,

    reversed in part, and remanded.

    Justice POWELL delivered the opinion of the Court

    as to Parts I, II, III-B, III-C, and IV, concluding

    that:

    *40 1. This Court does not lack jurisdiction on the

    ground that the decision below is not a final judg-

    ment or decree, as required by 28 U.S.C. 1257

    (3). Although this Court has no jurisdiction to re-

    view an interlocutory judgment, jurisdiction is

    proper where a federal claim has been finally de-

    cided, with further proceedings on the merits in the

    state courts to come, but in which later review of

    the federal issue cannot be had whatever the ulti-

    mate outcome of the case. Here, the Sixth Amend-

    ment issue will not survive for this Court to review

    regardless of the outcome of the proceedings on re-mand. The Sixth Amendment issue has been finally

    decided by the highest court of Pennsylvania, and

    unless this Court reviews that decision, the harm

    that the State seeks to avoid-the disclosure of the

    confidential file-will occur regardless of the result

    on remand. Pp. 996-998.

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 6

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXIhttp://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k2007http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k2007http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1985160104http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000546&DocName=28USCAS1257&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1985160104http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1906101604&ReferencePosition=287http://www.westlaw.com/Digest/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=MCC&DocName=110k2007http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110k2007http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%292http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI%28D%29http://www.westlaw.com/KeyNumber/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&CMD=KEY&DocName=110XXXI
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    7/29

    2. Criminal defendants have the right under the

    Compulsory Process Clause to the government's as-

    sistance in compelling the attendance of favorable

    witnesses at trial and the right to put before a jury

    evidence that might influence the determination of

    guilt. However, this Court has never held that the

    Clause guarantees the right to discover the identity

    of witnesses, or to require the government to pro-

    duce exculpatory evidence. Instead, claims such as

    respondent's traditionally have been evaluated un-

    der the broader protections of the Due Process

    Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Compulsory

    process provides no greater protections in this area

    than those afforded by due process, and thus re-

    spondent's claims more properly are considered by

    reference to due process. Pp. 1000-1001.

    3. Under due process principles, the government

    has the obligation to turn over evidence in its pos-

    session that is both favorable to the accused and

    material to guilt or punishment. Evidence is materi-

    al only if there is a reasonable probability that, had

    the evidence been disclosed, the result of the pro-

    ceeding would have been different. Although the

    public interest in protecting sensitive information

    such as that in CYS records is strong, this interest

    does not necessarily prevent disclosure in all cir-

    cumstances. Because the Pennsylvania Legislaturecontemplated some use of CYS records in judicial

    proceedings, there is no reason to believe that rel-

    evant information would not be disclosed when a

    court of competent jurisdiction determined that the

    information was material to the accused's**993

    defense. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court thus

    properly ordered a remand for further proceedings.

    Respondent is entitled to have the CYS file re-

    viewed by the trial court to determine whether it

    contains information that probably would have

    changed the outcome of his trial. If it does, he must

    be given a new trial. If the CYS file contains no

    such information, or if the nondisclosure is harm-

    less beyond a reasonable doubt, the trial court will

    be free to reinstate the prior conviction. Pp.

    1001-1002.

    *41 4. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred in

    holding that defense counsel must be allowed to ex-

    amine the confidential information. A defendant's

    right to discover exculpatory evidence does not in-

    clude the unsupervised authority to search the

    State's files and make the determination as to the

    materiality of the information. Both respondent's

    and the State's interests in ensuring a fair trial can

    be protected fully by requiring that the CYS files be

    submitted only to the trial court for in camera re-

    view. To allow full disclosure to defense counsel in

    this type of case would sacrifice unnecessarily the

    State's compelling interest in protecting its child ab-

    use information. Pp. 1002-1004.

    Justice POWELL, joined by THE CHIEFJUSTICE, Justice WHITE, and Justice

    O'CONNOR, concluded in Part III-A that the

    Pennsylvania Supreme Court erred in holding that

    the failure to disclose the CYS file violated the

    Confrontation Clause. There is no merit to respond-

    ent's claim that by denying him access to the in-

    formation necessary to prepare his defense, the trial

    court interfered with his right of cross-examination

    guaranteed by the Clause. Respondent argued that

    he could not effectively question his daughter be-

    cause, without the CYS material, he did not know

    which types of questions would best expose theweaknesses in her testimony. However, the Con-

    frontation Clause is not a constitutionally com-

    pelled rule of pretrial discovery. The right of con-

    frontation is a trial right, guaranteeing an opportun-

    ity for effective cross-examination, not cross-

    examination that is effective in whatever way and

    to whatever extent the defense might wish. Pp.

    998-1000.

    Justice BLACKMUN concluded that the Confronta-

    tion Clause may be relevant to limitations placed on

    a defendant's pretrial discovery. There may well be

    a confrontation violation if, as here, a defendant is

    denied pretrial access to information that would

    make possible effective cross-examination of a cru-

    cial prosecution witness. A State cannot avoid Con-

    frontation Clause problems simply by deciding to

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 7

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    8/29

    hinder the defendant's right to effective cross-

    examination, on the basis of a desire to protect the

    confidentiality interests of a particular class of indi-

    viduals, at the pretrial, rather than at the trial, stage.

    However, the procedure the Court has set out for

    the lower court to follow on remand is adequate to

    address any confrontation problem. Pp. 1004-1006.

    POWELL, J., announced the judgment of the Court

    and delivered the opinion of the Court with respect

    to Parts I, II , III-B, III-C, and IV, in which

    REHNQUIST, C.J., and WHITE, BLACKMUN,

    and O'CONNOR, JJ., joined, and an opinion with

    respect to Part III-A, in which REHNQUIST, C.J.,

    and WHITE and O'CONNOR, JJ., joined. BLACK-

    MUN, J., filed an opinion concurring in part andconcurring in the judgment, post, p. ---. BREN-

    NAN, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which MAR-

    SHALL, J., joined, *42 post, p. ---. STEVENS, J.,

    filed a dissenting opinion, in which BRENNAN,

    MARSHALL, and SCALIA, JJ., joined, post, p.

    1009.

    Edward Marcus Clark argued the cause for peti-

    tioner. With him on the briefs was Robert L. Eber-

    hardt.

    John H. Corbett, Jr., by invitation of the Court, 478

    U.S. 1019, argued the cause and filed a brief asamicus curiae in support of the judgment below.

    With him on the brief was Lester G. Nauhaus.*

    * Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed

    for the State of California et al. by John K. Van de

    Kamp, Attorney General, Steve White, Chief Assist-

    ant Attorney General, Arnold Overoye, Assistant

    Attorney General, Joel Carey, Supervising Deputy

    Attorney General, and Karen Ziskind, Deputy At-

    torney General, and by the Attorneys General for

    their respective States as follows: Duane Woodard

    of Colorado, Joseph Lieberman of Connecticut,Corinne Watanabe, Acting Attorney General of

    Hawaii, Neil F. Hartigan of Illinois, Linley E.

    Pearson of Indiana, David Armstrong of Kentucky,

    William J. Guste, Jr., of Louisiana, James E. Tier-

    ney of Maine, Hubert H. Humphrey III of Min-

    nesota, Edwin L. Pittman of Mississippi, Michael

    Greely of Montana, Stephen E. Merrill of New

    Hampshire, Lacy H. Thornburg of North Carolina,

    Mike Turpen of Oklahoma, LeRoy S. Zimmerman of

    Pennsylvania, Mike Cody of Tennessee, David L.

    Wilkinson of Utah, Jeffrey L. Amestoy of Vermont,

    William A. Broadus of Virginia, Kenneth O. Eiken-

    berry of Washington, Charlie Brown of West Vir-

    ginia, and Archie G. McClintock of Wyoming; for

    the County of Allegheny, Pennsylvania, on behalf

    of Allegheny County Children and Youth Services

    by George M. Janocsko and Robert L. McTiernan;

    for the Appellate Committee of the District Attor-

    neys Association of California by Ira Reiner, Harry

    B. Sondheim, and Arnold T. Guminski; for the

    Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape et al. by

    Nancy D. Wasser; and for the Sunny von BulowNational Victim Advocacy Center, Inc., et al. by

    Frank Gamble Carrington, Jr., David Crump, and

    Ann M. Haralambie.

    Justice POWELL announced the judgment of the

    Court and delivered the opinion of the Court with

    respect to Parts I, II, III-B, III-C, and IV, and an

    opinion with respect to Part III-A, in which THE

    CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice WHITE, and Justice

    O'CONNOR join.

    The question presented in this case is whether and

    to what extent a State's interest**994 in the confid-

    entiality of its investigative*43 files concerning

    child abuse must yield to a criminal defendant's

    Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment right to discover

    favorable evidence.

    I

    As part of its efforts to combat child abuse, the

    Commonwealth of Pennsylvania has established

    Children and Youth Services (CYS), a protective

    service agency charged with investigating cases of

    suspected mistreatment and neglect. In 1979, re-

    spondent George Ritchie was charged with rape, in-

    voluntary deviate sexual intercourse, incest, and

    corruption of a minor. The victim of the alleged at-

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 8

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&DocName=478US1019&FindType=Yhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&DocName=478US1019&FindType=Yhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&DocName=478US1019&FindType=Yhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&DocName=478US1019&FindType=Yhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&DocName=478US1019&FindType=Yhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=780&DocName=478US1019&FindType=Y
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    9/29

    tacks was his 13-year-old daughter, who claimed

    that she had been assaulted by Ritchie two or three

    times per week during the previous four years. The

    girl reported the incidents to the police, and the

    matter then was referred to the CYS.

    During pretrial discovery, Ritchie served CYS with

    a subpoena, seeking access to the records concern-

    ing the daughter. Ritchie requested disclosure of the

    file related to the immediate charges, as well as cer-

    tain records that he claimed were compiled in 1978,

    when CYS investigated a separate report by an

    unidentified source that Ritchie's children were be-

    ing abused.FN1

    CYS refused to comply with the

    subpoena, claiming that the records were privileged

    under Pennsylvania law. The relevant statuteprovides that all reports and other information ob-

    tained in the course of a CYS investigation must be

    kept confidential, subject to 11 specific exceptions.FN2

    One of those exceptions is that the agency may

    *44 disclose the reports to a court of competent

    jurisdiction pursuant to a court order.

    Pa.Stat.Ann., Tit. 11, 2215(a)(5) (Purdon

    Supp.1986).

    FN1. Although the 1978 investigation took

    place during the period that the daughter

    claimed she was being molested, it is un-disputed that the daughter did not tell CYS

    about the assaults at that time. No criminal

    charges were filed as a result of this earlier

    investigation.

    FN2. The statute provides in part:

    (a) Except as provided in section 14 [

    Pa.Stat.Ann., Tit. 11, 2214 (Purdon

    Supp.1986) ], reports made pursuant to

    this act including but not limited to re-

    port summaries of child abuse ... andwritten reports ... as well as any other in-

    formation obtained, reports written or

    photographs or X-rays taken concerning

    alleged instances of child abuse in the

    possession of the department, a county

    children and youth social service agency

    or a child protective service shall be con-

    fidential and shall only be made avail-

    able to:

    (5) A court of competent jurisdiction

    pursuant to a court order. Pa.Stat.Ann.,

    Tit. 11, 2215(a) (Purdon Supp.1986).

    At the time of trial the statute only

    provided five exceptions to the general

    rule of confidentiality, including the ex-

    ception for court-ordered disclosure. The

    statute was amended in 1982 to increase

    the number of exceptions. For example,

    the records now may be revealed to law

    enforcement officials for use in criminal

    investigations. 2215(a)(9). But, the

    identity of a person who reported the ab-

    use or who cooperated in the investiga-

    tion may not be released if the disclosure

    would be detrimental to that person's

    safety. 2215(c).

    Ritchie moved to have CYS sanctioned for failing

    to honor the subpoena, and the trial court held a

    hearing on the motion in chambers. Ritchie argued

    that he was entitled to the information because the

    file might contain the names of favorable witnesses,

    as well as other, unspecified exculpatory evidence.

    He also requested disclosure of a medical report

    that he believed was compiled during the 1978 CYS

    investigation. Although the trial judge acknow-

    ledged that he had not examined the entire CYS

    file, he accepted a CYS representative's assertion

    that there was no medical report in the record.FN3

    The judge then denied the motion and refused to or-

    der CYS to disclose the files.FN4

    See App. 72a.

    FN3. The trial judge stated that he did not

    read 50 pages or more of an extensive re-

    cord. App. 72a. The judge had no know-

    ledge of the case before the pretrial hear-

    ing. See id., at 68a.

    FN4. There is no suggestion that the Com-

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 9

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2214&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2214&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2214&FindType=Lhttp://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=1000262&DocName=PS11S2215&FindType=L
  • 8/9/2019 Penn v. Richie 480 U.S. 39

    10/29

    monwealth's prosecutor was given access

    to the file at any point in the proceedings,

    or that he was aware of its contents.

    **995 At trial, the main witness against Ritchie was

    his daughter. In an attempt to rebut her testimony,

    defense counsel *45 cross-examined the girl at

    length, questioning her on all aspects of the alleged

    attacks and her reasons for not reporting the incid-

    ents sooner. Except for routine evidentiary rulings,

    the trial judge placed no limitation on the scope of

    cross-examination. At the close of trial Ritchie was

    convicted by a jury on all counts, and the judge

    sentenced him to 3 to 10 years in prison.

    On appeal to the Pennsylvania Superior Court,

    Ritchie claimed, inter alia, that the failure to dis-

    close the contents of the CYS file violated the Con-

    frontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, as ap-

    plied to the States through the Due Process Clause

    of the Fourteenth Amendment.FN5

    The court

    agreed that there had been a constitutional viola-

    tion, and accordingly vacated the conviction and re-

    manded for further proceedings. 324 Pa.Super. 557,

    472 A.2d 220 (1984). The Superior Court ruled,

    however, that the right of confrontation did not en-

    title Ritchie to the full disclosure that he sought. It

    held that on remand, the trial judge first was to ex-amine the confidential material in camera, and re-

    lease only the verbatim statements made by the

    daughter to the CYS counselor. But the full record

    then was to be made available to Ritchie's lawyer,

    for the limited purpose of allowing him to argue the

    relevance of the statements. The court stated that

    the prosecutor also should be allowed to argue that

    the failure to disclose the statements was harmless

    error. If the trial judge determined that the lack of

    information was prejudicial,*46 Ritchie would be

    entitled to a new trial. Id., at 567-568, 472 A.2d, at

    226.

    FN5. The Sixth Amendment of the United

    States Constitution protects both the right

    of confrontation and the right of compuls-

    ory process:

    In all criminal prosecutions, the ac-

    cused shall enjoy the right ... to be con-

    fronted with the witnesses against him;

    [and] to have compulsory process for ob-

    taining witnesses in his favor.

    Both Clauses are made obligatory on the

    States by the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400, 403-406,

    85 S.Ct. 1065, 1067-1069, 13 L.Ed.2d

    923 (1965) (Confrontation Clause);

    Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14,

    17-19, 87 S.Ct. 1920, 1922-1923, 18

    L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967) (Compulsory Pro-

    cess Clause).

    On appeal by the Commonwealth, the Supreme

    Court of Pennsylvania agreed that the conviction

    must be vacated and the case remanded to determ-

    ine if a new trial is necessary. 509 Pa. 357, 502

    A.2d 148 (1985). But the court did not agree that

    the search for material evidence must be limited to

    the daughter's verbatim statements. Rather, it con-

    cluded that Ritchie, through his lawyer, is entitled

    to review the entire file to search for any useful

    evidence.FN6

    It stated: When materials gathered

    become an arrow of inculpation, the person inculp-

    ated has a fundamental constitutional right to exam-ine the provenance of the arrow and he who aims

    it. Id., at 367, 502 A.2d, at 153. The Pennsylvania

    Court concluded that by denying access to the file,

    the trial court order had violated both the Confront-

    ation Clause and the Compulsory Process Clause.

    The court was unpersuaded by the Commonwealth's

    argument that the trial judge already had examined

    the file and determined that it contained no relevant

    information. It ruled that the constitutional infirm-

    ity in the trial court's order was that Ritchie was un-

    lawfully denied the opportunity to have the records

    reviewed by the eyes and the perspective of an ad-

    vocate, who may see relevance in places that a

    neutral judge would not. Ibid.

    FN6. The court noted that the trial court

    should take appropriate steps to guard

    against improper dissemination of the con-

    107 S.Ct. 989 Page 10

    480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989, 94 L.Ed.2d 40, 55 USLW 4180, 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1

    (Cite as: 480 U.S. 39, 107 S.Ct. 989)

    2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

    http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1984108864http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1984108864http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1984108864&ReferencePosition=226http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1984108864&ReferencePosition=226http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1984108864&ReferencePosition=226http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1965125051&ReferencePosition=1067http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1965125051&ReferencePosition=1067http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1965125051&ReferencePosition=1067http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1965125051&ReferencePosition=1067http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1967129547&ReferencePosition=1922http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1967129547&ReferencePosition=1922http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1967129547&ReferencePosition=1922http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=708&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1967129547&ReferencePosition=1922http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1985160104http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&SerialNum=1985160104http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1985160104&ReferencePosition=153http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.wl?rs=dfa1.0&vr=2.0&DB=162&FindType=Y&ReferencePositionType=S&SerialNum=1985160104&ReferencePosition=153http://www.westlaw.com/Find/Default.w