people vs. genosa (digest)
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 People vs. Genosa (Digest)
1/1
PEOPLE V. GENOSA
GRNo.-135891 Sept. 29, 2000
Appellant was found guilty of parricide. She now requests an examination by
psychologists to determine her state of mind then under the ground of the batteredwoman syndrome.
Held:
There are four characteristics of the syndrome:1)woman believes that the violence was
her fault;2)she has an inability to place the responsibility for the violence
elsewhere;3)she fears for her life and/or the childrens lives;4)she has an irrational belief
that the abuser is omnipresent and omniscient. Trapped in a cycle of violence and
constant fear, it is not unlikely that she would succumb to her helplessness and fail to
perceive possible solutions to the problem than to injure or kill her batterer. She is
seized by fear of an existing or impending lethal aggression and thus would have noopportunity beforehand to deliberate o her acts and to choose a less fatal means of
eliminating her sufferings.
Petition granted. In P v Pares, after a final conviction of appellant therein, the Court
granted his Urgent Omnibus Motion and allowed him to undergo mental and neuralgic
other examinations to determine that he was a deaf-mute. Based on that finding and
that he was unaided in the trial, he was granted a rearrangement and retrial. This action
is justified on the rule that only upon proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt may an
accused to consigned to a lethal injection chamber. Also as Justice Pun said, man
should be adjudged or held accountable for wrongful acts so long as free will appearsunimpaired.