perceptual development (cross cultural studies)

Upload: elias-vouzounis

Post on 03-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    1/14

    Perceptual Development

    1

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    2/14

    Perceptual Development

    One way of investigating perceptual development in terms ofnature or nurture is to look at the perceptual abilities of peopleliving in different environments to see how their environmental(cultural) experiences might alter the development of their

    perceptual abilities. If such abilities are innate, we should expectpeople living in different environments to develop in the sameway.

    Although this information is important to the understanding of

    the topic it is not worthy of any marks and so you should onlyuse the information to create an introductory sentence.

    2

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    3/14

    Depth Perception across Cultures

    Hudson (1960):

    3

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    4/14

    Hudson (1960)

    Method: Experiment

    Sample: Bantu, Indian and European Cultures

    Procedure: The children were shown various drawings each with an elephant, anantelope and spear.

    Results: At the beginning of their primary education ALL children had difficulty

    using these depth cues BUT by the end of primary education nearly all the

    European children could interpret the depth cues accurately. The Bantu

    though still saw the pictures as two-dimensional.

    Conclusion: SO not only important in showing how depth perception develops over

    time but also highlights cross-cultural differences too. As they did not

    perceive depth in the same way it must be learned ability rather than an

    innate one (Nurture). 4

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    5/14

    Evaluation (AO2)

    However, it was thought that this inability was more to do with

    the fact that there were no depth cues such as motion parallax

    or texture gradient. The pictures were thought to be more

    epitomic than eidolic and thus included no information regarding

    depth. The study by Jahoda & McGurk (1974) is more eidolic(uses texture gradients) and this explains why there were more

    3D responders than in Hudsons study.

    5

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    6/14

    Support? (AO2)

    Jahoda & McGurk (1974):

    Using Children from Scotland and Ghana they found that when these depth

    cues were included in the pictures perception improved across the board.

    Further, older children were able to perceive depth better than the youngerones showing support for development over time.

    BUT although cultural differences existed, results did not support the view

    that Ghanaian children were more deficient in perceiving pictorial depth.

    Conclusion: Any differences could have been due to lack of familiarity with

    the conventions of Western Art as opposed to any difficulty in perceiving

    depth showing that experience matters (Gregory/nurture). However, this may

    be to less of an extent than was originally thought

    .6

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    7/14

    Further support (AO2)

    Hagen & Jones (1978):

    Certain cues such as texture gradient seem more

    important to people from non-western cultures and

    that these people can quickly learn to interpret

    pictorial cues when exposed to formal western

    education (nurture). They concluded that the closer toreal life the pictures were the more easily understood

    they became.

    7

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    8/14

    However (AO2)

    The pictures were more epitomic in nature and so provided no information

    regarding depth (e.g. motion parallax or texture gradient).

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    9/14

    Size Constancy in Cross-Cultural Research

    Segall (1963):

    9

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    10/14

    Debate

    Freewill or Biological Determinism?

    Myopia = shortsightedness!

    10

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    11/14

    SO:Nature or Nurture?

    11

    One of the issues here is being able to determine what counts as nature and

    what counts as nurture. The visual system of an infant has yet to fully mature

    and such physical or innate abilities need to develop with age.

    Thus, we cannot claim that any abilities which appear after birth are due to

    experience (nurture)

    they might be, but they might also be the result of amaturing visual system (nature). In addition, abilities that appear at birth could

    be the result of sensory learning in the womb (nurture not nature)!

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    12/14

    Methodological Issues

    It is difficult to draw conclusion about perception from studies

    using infants. They cannot speak or understand instructions and

    may become bored or fatigued quite easily. Such issues have led

    to researchers coming up with ingenious methods for testing

    perceptual abilities and as such can only make assumptions

    about the outcome.

    12

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    13/14

    Exam Question

    Discuss the development of perceptual abilities.Include examples from infant and cross-cultural

    studies in your answer (8 marks + 16 marks)

    13

  • 7/28/2019 Perceptual Development (Cross Cultural Studies)

    14/14

    Markscheme

    Clear understanding of the implications

    of these findings in terms ofperceptual development.

    14