performance appraisal
DESCRIPTION
Performance Appraisal. Mohsin, Putri Saniyah Fullerton, Christopher Rautajuuri, Ilkka. Agenda. Introduction Definition Purposes of performance appraisal How to develop an effective program Who is involved? The evaluated are… Performance appraisal in Finland - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Performance Appraisal
Mohsin, Putri Saniyah
Fullerton, Christopher
Rautajuuri, Ilkka
Agenda Introduction
Definition Purposes of performance appraisal
How to develop an effective program Who is involved? The evaluated are… Performance appraisal in Finland How to convince the employees that is not a punitive process
Appraisal methods MBO 3600
Conclusion
Introduction
Definition Purposes of performance appraisal Performance appraisal in Finland Why BP-CENTRO must use this
approach
Definition
Performance appraisal are very helpful tools an organization can use to maintain and enhance productivity and facilitate progress toward strategic goals.
They can serve many purposes that benefit both the organization and the employee whose performance is being appraised
Definition (continue)
They give employees the opportunity to discuss performance with supervisors
They provide the supervisor with a means of identifying the strengths and weaknesses of an employee’s performance
They provide a basis for salary recommendations
The most common uses of performance appraisal are: Administrative Purposes: they provide input
that can be used for the entire range of HRM activities (ex. Compensation decisions)
Developmental Purposes: they provide the feedback essential for discussing strengths and weaknesses as well as improving performance
Purposes of Performance Appraisal
How to develop an effective program
Who is involved? Who is evaluated? What is the frequency? How to convince employees that this is not a
punitive process?
Who is involved ?
To develop an effective program, the HR department has to take the primary responsibility for co-ordinating the activities with the managers from the other departments whom must be actively involved in helping to establish the objectives for the program
Later, give the chance to participate low level employees
The evaluated are:
CEO BP-CENTRO: ==> Annually, MBO Top Managers: ==> Annually, MBO Country managers: ==> Annually, MBO, 3600
Regional managers:==> Annually, MBO, 3600
Facility managers: ==> Quarterly, MBO, 3600
Facility assistants: ==> Quarterly, 3600
Performance Appraisal in Finland
Appraisal system is very familiar to every Finnish company and the managers are used to work with this system
In Eastern European Countries and Russia this system is not that familiar as it is in Finland
How to convince employees that is not a punitive process?
In Finland it should not be a problem In Eastern Europe and Russia, before
implementing the appraisal system, it should be an introduction. (Ex. Seminars, take employees to Finland and show how the system works, etc)
Appraisal Methods
Management by objectives
3600
Management by objectives
measures performance on the basis of employee achievement of goals set by mutual agreement of employee and manager
Why MBO is chosen? The system acts as a goal setting process whereby
objectives are established for the organization (BP-CENTRO), and departments, and individual managers and employees (country, regional and facility managers)
BP-CENTRO MBO PROGRAMCEO
Organization’s common goals.
Finance, Marketing, HR, Logistics managers
Departments’ specific goals
Country, regional, facility and assistant facility manager lists goals and measures for subordinate
Country, regional, facility and assistant facility manager proposes goals and measures for his or her job
Review period providing feedback on results measures against establish goals
Joint agreement on goals
New input provided
Inappropriate goals eliminated
Review of organization performance
Final review of results measures against establish goals
3600 Is an all-rounder form of evaluating
employees’ performance from all angles that includes supervisors, peers, subordinates and customer
Quality of information is better than other systems
It may lessen bias/prejudice because feedback comes from more people
Conclusions
The success of an organization depends largely on the performance of its human resources and how they design effective appraisal programs
Performance appraisal programs give the basis to compensation