performance-based monitoring analysis system
DESCRIPTION
Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System. 2013 Results. Guiding Principles of the PBMAS. Guiding Principles of the PBMAS. Guiding Principles of the PBMAS. Performance Indicators. Performance Levels. Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD. 2013 PBMAS Results. Change in Performance Levels. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Performance-Based MonitoringAnalysis System
2013 Results
Guiding Principles of the PBMAS
Annual Statewide Accountability
Public Input
Coordination
Guiding Principles of the PBMAS
Maximum Inclusion
Individual ProgramAccountability
High Standards
Guiding Principles of the PBMAS
School DistrictEffectiveness
Statutory Requirements
Valid Indicators of Performance
Performance IndicatorsBE/
ESL
•30 Indicators
CTE
•25 Indicators
NCLB
•26 Indicators
Sp.Ed.
•35 Indicators
Performance Levels
Level 0Level 1
Level 2 Level 3
Report Only NA No Data Agency
Review
Hurst-Euless-Bedford ISD
2013 PBMAS Results
Change in Performance Levels
• 69 of 80 Indicators met (86%)
2012
• 101 of 116 Indicators met (87%)
2013
Bilingual Education/ESL
District 0 1 2 3Report Only NA
No Data
H-E-B 19 6 1 0 4 0 0
Birdville 11 6 7 0 4 2 0
Carroll 18 0 0 0 4 2 6
Keller 18 4 1 1 4 2 0
Grapevine-Colleyville 11 5 8 1 4 1 0
Northwest 15 4 1 2 4 4 0
Conroe 13 10 3 0 4 0 0
Richardson 15 3 3 3 4 2 0
Katy 20 5 1 0 4 0 0
Bilingual Education/ESL
Level 1 Indicators• Bilingual STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate in Writing• ESL STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate in Mathematics• ESL STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate in Reading• ESL STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate in Science• LEP STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate in Writing• LEP RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate
Level 2 Indicators• ESL STAAR 3-8 Passing Rate in Writing
Career & Technical Education
District 0 1 2 3Report Only NA
No Data
H-E-B 24 1 0 0 0 0 0
Birdville 24 1 0 0 0 0 0
Carroll 14 0 0 0 0 0 11
Keller 23 0 0 0 0 2 0
Grapevine-Colleyville 19 1 0 0 0 5 0
Northwest 22 1 0 0 0 2 0
Conroe 24 1 0 0 0 0 0
Richardson 18 1 0 0 0 1 5
Katy 25 0 0 0 0 0 0
Career & Technical EducationLevel 1 Indicators
• CTE Nontraditional Course Completion Rate - Females
No Child Left Behind
District 0 1 2 3Report Only NA
No Data
H-E-B 20 0 0 0 2 3 1
Birdville 12 1 0 1 2 3 7
Carroll 4 0 0 0 2 2 18
Keller 12 1 0 0 2 0 11
Grapevine-Colleyville 9 0 0 0 2 3 12
Northwest 10 0 0 0 2 2 12
Conroe 18 1 0 0 2 5 0
Richardson 13 2 0 0 2 7 2
Katy 10 1 0 1 2 0 12
No Child Left Behind
Made Required Improvement• Title 1, Part A RHSP/DAP Diploma Rate
(from 66.7 to 69.7)
Special Education
District 0 1 2 3ReportOnly NA
AgencyReview
H-E-B 21 3 4 0 6 0 1
Birdville 17 9 3 0 6 0 0
Carroll 27 2 0 0 6 0 0
Keller 16 9 3 0 6 0 1
Grapevine-Colleyville 15 12 1 0 6 0 1
Northwest 21 7 1 0 6 0 0
Conroe 17 7 4 0 6 0 1
Richardson 17 9 2 1 6 0 0
Katy 21 7 0 0 6 0 1
Special Education
Made Required Improvement• Special Education Representation (from 9.1
to 8.8)
Level 1 Indicators• SPED Year-After-Exit STAAR 3-8 Passing
Rate – Writing• SPED Placements in Instructional Settings
40/41 (Ages 6-11)• SPED Placements in Instructional Settings
40/41 (Ages 12-21)
Special Education
Level 2 Indicators• SPED STAAR Participation Rate• SPED STAAR Modified Participation Rate• SPED Placements in Instructional Settings
40/41 (Ages 3-5)• SPED Discretionary ISS Placements
Texas Accountability Intervention System (TAIS)
TAIS Continuous Improvement Process Diagram