performance plan 2014/2015 - department of correctional services · 2018. 8. 24. · 2 department...

Correctional ServicesDepartment:

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

correctional services

annual

Plan

2014/2015

performance

errata

1DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES • Annual Performance Plan 2014/2015

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES Annual Performance Plan

2014/2015

Correctional ServicesDepartment:

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

correctional services


Successful implementation of this 2014/2015 Annual Performance Plan (APP) is crucial as part of our commitment to South African citizenry. As a department responsible for the custody and management of remand detainees (RDs), as well as sentenced offenders in custody and under community corrections supervision, the Department of Correctional Services (DCS) is capable of, and competent in, delivering services as per the mandate vested upon us.

Our correctional facilities must become centres of excellence offering new beginnings to those on the wrong side of the law. Therefore, the manner in which correctional officials execute their duties throughout the correctional services value chain is of paramount importance.

As part of our review of the past financial year (2012/2013), we also reflect on what difference we made to the lives of our citizens. DCS has raised the bar not only in terms of improving the quality of service delivery, but also in ensuring that our Vision of “Providing the best Correctional Services for a safer South Africa” becomes a reality.

As we move into the new five-year cycle of government, DCS will ensure that service delivery is aligned to the National Development Plan (NDP). This APP is an essential building block towards realisation of the NDP. It is of utmost importance that, whatever we do as a government department, all our efforts are aligned to the broader government outcomes and the NDP.

The recommendations of the National Planning Commission (NPC), in respect of building safer communities (Chapter 12) and fighting corruption (Chapter 14), provide the basis for our performance plans over the next 16 years. Chapter 12 of the NDP places priority on the implementation of the seven-point plan with immediate effect. Although our service delivery mandate is not limited purely to, and exclusively guided by, the two chapters mentioned above, these chapters essentially capture the essence of what needs to be done to make sure all South Africans are and feel safe.

In our quest to rehabilitate and successfully reintegrate offenders into society, Chapter 9 of the NDP, pertaining to education and training of South Africans including offenders, is also relevant. In partnership with the Department of Basic Education (DBE) and Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET), we will pay attention to the targeted number of learners assessed in literacy, mathematics and science, the number of learners completing 12 years of schooling and vocational education as well as to producing 30 000 artisans by 2030.

Mr JS Ndebele, MPMinister of Correctional Services

FOREWORD by thE MiNiStER


Other chapters in the NDP, relevant to our Strategic Plan and APP, include:

• Promoting health (Chapter 10)

• Economy and employment (Chapter 3)

• Building a capable and developmental state (Chapter 13)

As part of the Justice, Crime Prevention and Security (JCPS) cluster, DCS remains committed to providing humane correctional services to all inmates and offenders with full consideration of the rights of victims and their families. Our commitment to delivering on our mandate as per the Constitution, relevant legislation, policies and the NDP 2030 is clearly reflected in the performance indicators, and targets set out in this APP.

Mr J.S. Ndebele (MP)

Minister of Correctional Services


It is hereby certified that this Annual Performance Plan:

Was developed by the management of the Department of Correctional Services under the guidance of Minister Sibusiso Ndebele

Was prepared in line with the current Strategic Plan of the Department of Correctional Services

Accurately reflects the performance targets that the Department of Correctional Services will endeavour to achieve given the resources made available in the budget for 2014/2015.

N. MarekaChief Financial Officer (Acting) Signature:

t.b. RaserokaHead Official responsible for Planning (Acting) Signature:

N.J. JolinganaAccounting Officer (Acting) Signature:

Approved by:

S. NdebeleExecutive Authority Signature:

OFFiciAl SigN-OFF


tAblE OF cONtENtS

Foreword by the Minister of correctional Services.....2

Official sign-off............................................................4

PARt A: StRAtEgic OvERviEW .................................................6

1. Updated situational analysis ................................... 8

1.1 Performance delivery environment ..............8

1.2 Organisational environment ..............................9

2. Revisions to legislative and other mandates ........... 9

3. Overview of 2014/2015 budget and Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) estimates ............ 10

3.1 Expenditure estimates 2014 ............................ 10

PARt b: PROgRAMME AND Sub-PROgRAMME PlANS ...........12

4. Programme 1: ADMINISTRATION .......................... 14

4.1 Sub-Programme: Management .................... 14

4.2 Sub-programme: Finance ................................. 18

4.3 Sub-programme: Corporate Services ........ 21

5. Programme 2: INCARCERATION ............................ 23

5.1 Sub-programme: Security Operations...... 23

5.2 Sub-programme: Facilities................................ 25

5.3 Sub-programme: Remand Detention ....... 27

5.4 Sub-Programme: Offender Management ...................................... 30

6. Programme 3: REHABILITATION ............................ 32

7. Programme 4: CARE .............................................. 37

7.1 Sub-programme: Nutritional Services ....................... 37

7.2 Sub-programme: Health Services ................................ 38

7.3 Sub-programme: Hygiene Services ........................... 40

8. Programme 5: SOCIAL REINTEGRATION...................... 42

8.1 Sub-Programme: Parole Administration .................. 42

8.2. Sub-Programme: Supervision ........................................ 43

8.3. Sub-Programme: Community Reintegration ........ 46

8.4. Sub-programme: Office Accommodation: Community Corrections .................................................... 48

PARt c: liNkS tO OthER PlANS .............................................50

Links to the long-term infrastructure and other capital plans ................................................................................. 52

Acronyms ..................................................................................................... 59

Technical Indicator Descriptors ..................................................... 61

6

APART

7

Strategic Overview


PARt A: Strategic Overview

1. Updated sitUational analysis

1.1 Performance delivery environment

The performance delivery environment of the DCS is rooted in the new-found ideals of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa (1996), the White Paper on Corrections in South Africa (2005), and the draft White Paper on Remand Detention, all of which contribute to government’s outcome approach to service delivery. The performance delivery environment is fundamentally shaped by the criminal justice system, size and nature of the inmate population and the community corrections population, the state of the departmental infrastructure and the organisational environment.

Various activities of other departments in the criminal justice system, such as arrest trends, the management of investigation processes, case management and case backlogs and sentencing trends, impact directly on the service delivery environment of the DCS, and are beyond the direct control of the department. There are three points at which the department receive inputs from the criminal justice system, which are as follows:

• During the arrest and court processes when accused persons are incarcerated as remand detainees (RDs) with or without bail.

• At the end of the trial process when an accused person is convicted and sentenced either to incarceration, or as a probationer, sentenced to a non-custodial sentence under the department’s correctional supervision systems.

• From within the department’s own processes as parolees are released into the community corrections system.

There is massive diversity in terms of infrastructure size, minimum standards and facilities across the South African correctional centres, given the time periods during which they were built, the purposes for which they were built and the political landscape that prevailed when they were built. The DCS must manage this legacy to enable a set of minimum norms and standards to prevail across all centres and to ensure cost-effective and efficient centres. At the beginning of the 2012/2013 financial year, of the 243 correctional centres, there were:

• 156 centres with a capacity of 500 beds with a combined capacity of 27 840 beds. Of these

– 112 correctional centres had a bed capacity of less than 250, which represent 13 214 approved bed spaces.

– 44 centres had a bed capacity of 251 to 500 beds, which represents 14 626 approved bed spaces.

• Altogether 61 centres in the capacity group 501 to 1 000 beds have a combined capacity of 42 502 beds.

• Eleven centres had a capacity of 1 001 to 1 500 bed spaces, accounting for 13 705 beds.

• Fifteen centres (13 plus the two public-private partnership correctional centres) have a capacity of more than 1 500, which represents 34 397 approved bed spaces.

The partnership between the DCS and the Department of Public Works (DPW) for the management and delivery of the infrastructure development programme will remain a primary area of attention in the 2014/2015 financial year, focusing especially on the successful implementation of the signed Service Level Agreement (SLA) between the two departments.

As a crucial component at various nodes in the integrated criminal justice value chain, the performance delivery environment of the department is also impacted on by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) systems of the criminal justice system. The department is working in developing end points to interface with the CJS common database in order to exchange information of the agreed Key Performance Indicators. This is aiming at interfacing, interoperable and integration


of relevant systems to feed the Integrated Justice System, enhancing criminal justice information management and data alignment.

In particular, the department is contributing to delivery on Outcome 3 – All people in South Africa are and feel safe – by providing services to remand detainees, incarcerated offenders and, increasing the number of parolees who do not violate their parole conditions, the number of victims who are involved in parole sittings, and the number of offenders who participate in rehabilitation programmes.

1.2 Organisational environment

Remand detention, incarceration and corrections, and community corrections are all essentially people driven services. The performance delivery environment is thus directly dependent on the management of human resources and hence on the organisational environment. Over the past few years the organisational environment has experienced instability of leadership, inadequate and inappropriate staffing patterns, unstable and insecure ICT systems, inconsistencies in spending patterns, and challenges in procurement and contract management.

The adequate staffing of correctional centres, remand detention facilities and community corrections offices cannot be addressed without a turnaround in relation to entry level appointments, who require completion of basic training before appointment in the department. To this end, the department has decided to increase the annual intake.

The retention and attraction of scarce professionals like psychologists, artisans, pharmacists, social workers, healthcare workers and educators remain a challenge and the department has identified that it needs to revise its retention strategies.

The Department has stabilize its IT Network and unfunctional emails, by shutting down unused servers and services and controlling the access to the network by limiting network administration rights and centralise email access to SITA. It improved connectivity and information security by migrating to the SITA VPN. The Department also reviewed and revised consultants contracts, job assignments and paired consultants with IT officials as part of the skills transfer. It developed a professional development plan for IT officials to enhance technical, administration and management skills. The Department developed an IT Governance and controls according to international standards (processes and/or procedures), implemented a validation framework to determine and ensure the validity of the business-IT alignment. Review and revise SITA SLA’s, outstanding debts and negotiated and agreed on the governance and engagement models with SITA.

2. Revisions to legislative and otheR mandates

The Correctional Matters Amendment Act, (Act 5 of 2011), which has been implemented in a phased approach since 1 March 2013, has brought a major policy development in relation to the management of remand detention. The policy development is outlined in the draft White Paper on Remand Detention on which several stakeholders were consulted in the 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 financial years.

In 2013/2014, the proclamation for the implementation date of 1 July 2013 for section 49G was signed by the President on 23 June 2013. The section makes provision for the referral of RDs to court based on the length of detention. Referrals are initiated by the DCS through sending applications to courts three months before the RDs complete a period of two years in detention. If the courts decide that the detainees must continue with detention, subsequent applications are submitted annually i.e., three months before the RDs complete successive years from the third year onwards.

Since section 49G is not aligned with the Criminal Procedure Act (Act 51 of 1977), the Criminal Justice System Review Committee referred the provision to the office of the State Law Adviser for an interpretation so that there could be uniformity in the implementation of the provision in all courts. The detailed interpretation dated 2 August 2013 was communicated to all the regions so that the heads of centres could provide appropriate response to the families of the remand detainees who were enquiring about the court decision.


A fu

rthe

r key

are

a in

the

Am

endm

ent A

ct is

the

Med

ical

Par

ole

Polic

y, w

hich

was

fina

lised

with

impl

emen

tatio

n ta

king

pla

ce in

the

2012

/201

3 fin

anci

al y

ear.

Ano

ther

key

pol

icy

deve

lopm

ent t

hat w

as a

ppro

ved

by th

e M

inis

ter a

nd d

isse

min

ated

to re

gion

s for

inpu

ts in

201

1/20

12 w

as th

e O

ffend

er L

abou

r Pol

icy

Fram

ewor

k. T

his p

olic

y is

aim

ed a

t im

prov

ing

the

part

icip

atio

n of

offe

nder

s in

labo

ur a

nd fa

cilit

ates

the

poss

ibili

ty o

f em

ploy

men

t aft

er re

leas

e.

Two

sign

ifica

nt c

hang

es in

the

busi

ness

pro

cess

resu

lted

in th

e in

itiat

ion

of p

olic

y de

velo

pmen

t in

rela

tion

to H

alfw

ay H

ouse

s an

d th

e el

ectr

onic

mon

itorin

g of

par

olee

s. Th

ese

polic

ies

will

be

impl

emen

ted

durin

g 20

14/2

015.

3.

ov

eRv

iew

of

2014

/201

5 b

Ud

get

an

d m

ediU

m t

eRm

ex

pen

dit

UR

e fR

am

ewo

Rk

(m

tef)

est

ima

tes

3.1

Exp

end

itu

re e

stim

ates

201

4

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

esA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

R’00

0R’

000

R’00

0R’

000

R’00

0R’

000

R’00

0

Prog

ram

me

Adm

inis

trat

ion

2 81

7 17

63

547

465

3 13

9 63

83

674

714

3 62

2 85

53

837

078

4 10

3 43

5

Min

istr

y24

410

35 1

5538

544

34 2

8130

940

32 6

3034

622

Man

agem

ent

653

664

815

682

767

963

1 10

8 84

91

024

926

1 07

6 59

71

158

553

Corp

orat

e Se

rvic

es96

0 86

61

639

108

1 24

5 97

81

371

973

1 47

6 56

91

567

715

1 70

7 42

9

Fina

nce

1 01

6 37

487

6 46

892

8 63

696

4 63

793

9 55

21

009

053

1 04

1 13

5

Inte

rnal

Aud

it40

453

53 2

3950

136

68 8

9895

115

90 9

2898

168

Offi

ce A

ccom

mod

atio

n10

1 70

110

6 05

210

7 95

812

4 07

655

753

60 1

5563

528

Resi

dent

ial A

ccom

mod

atio

n19

708

21 7

6142

32

000

00

0

Prog

ram

me

Inca

rcer

atio

n9

120

661

9 78

2 80

810

994

780

11 5

27 0

6912

299

037

12 9

24 8

4813

708

685

Secu

rity

Ope

ratio

ns4

389

716

4 74

2 64

35

746

233

5 67

7 19

26

230

783

6 55

0 54

36

961

329

Faci

litie

s2

795

333

2 94

0 03

33

380

091

3 51

0 50

33

676

234

3 84

3 66

44

038

542

Rem

and

Det

entio

n59

7 26

159

9 96

724

7 59

970

8 18

874

1 14

178

1 68

785

3 42

0

Offe

nder

Man

agem

ent

1 33

8 35

11

500

165

1 62

0 85

71

631

186

1 65

0 87

91

748

954

1 85

5 39

4

Prog

ram

me

Reha

bilit

atio

n75

2 73

780

8 15

284

1 62

61

077

287

1 16

5 76

31

237

000

1 33

3 45

1

Corr

ectio

nal P

rogr

amm

es22

581

26 4

4827

333

53 2

7457

929

61 0

7665

108


Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

esA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

R’00

0R’

000

R’00

0R’

000

R’00

0R’

000

R’00

0

Offe

nder

Dev

elop

men

t51

2 70

953

5 73

855

6 18

167

0 43

873

9 35

577

2 50

284

2 11

0

Psyc

holo

gica

l, So

cial

and

Spi

ritua

l Se

rvic

es21

7 44

724

5 96

625

8 11

235

3 57

536

8 47

940

3 42

242

6 23

3

Prog

ram

me

Care

1 41

6 92

01

482

991

1 66

8 87

31

667

008

1 74

7 22

61

852

168

1 93

8 85

2

Nut

ritio

nal S

ervi

ces

815

929

828

798

1 00

4 00

187

5 63

792

3 16

397

4 95

41

022

173

Hea

lth S

ervi

ces

507

708

518

867

584

311

657

221

693

978

748

213

779

723

Hyg

ieni

c Se

rvic

es93

283

135

326

80 5

6113

4 15

013

0 08

512

9 00

113

6 95

6

Prog

ram

me

Soci

al R

eint

egra

tion

591

349

655

385

668

637

802

415

886

230

944

177

996

471

Paro

le A

dmin

istr

atio

n58

374

64 9

4862

980

102

732

110

513

118

324

126

116

Supe

rvis

ion

492

456

546

083

552

516

625

195

692

218

738

039

777

612

Com

mun

ity R

eint

egra

tion

18 5

7921

317

33 5

3739

488

41 4

5943

588

46 0

74

Offi

ce A

ccom

mod

atio

n: C

omm

unity

Co

rrec

tions

21 9

4023

037

19 6

0435

000

42 0

4044

226

46 6

69

12

PART b

13

PROGRAMME AND SUB-PROGRAMME PLANS


Part

b: P

rogr

amm

e an

d Su

b-pr

ogra

mm

e pl

ans

4.

pRo

gR

am

me

1: a

dm

inis

tRa

tio

n

Prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

adm

inis

trat

ive

supp

ort a

nd s

trat

egic

lead

ersh

ip to

the

depa

rtm

ent

4.1

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: M

anag

emen

t

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

lead

ersh

ip fo

r the

ove

rall

man

agem

ent a

nd a

dmin

istr

atio

n of

the

depa

rtm

ent

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

Ann

ual t

arge

ts fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Effec

tive

man

agem

ent o

f bus

ines

s pr

oces

ses

to p

rom

ote

good

gov

erna

nce

and

ethi

cal a

dmin

istr

atio

n.

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tPr

otec

t dep

artm

enta

l dec

isio

n pr

oces

ses f

rom

unj

ustifi

able

cou

rt c

halle

nges

by

defe

ndin

g 10

0 pe

r cen

t of c

ases

inst

itute

d ag

ains

t the

dep

artm

ent

Just

ifica

tion

To e

nsur

e th

at d

ecis

ion

mak

ing

pow

ers

of th

e de

part

men

tal f

unct

iona

ries

are

defe

nded

so

as to

avo

id s

ame

bein

g re

view

ed a

nd s

et a

side

by

cour

ts.

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe.

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

20

13/2

014

Targ

ets

per a

nnum

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Effec

tive

man

agem

ent

of

litig

atio

n ca

ses

Perc

enta

ge o

f ca

ses

brou

ght

agai

nst t

he

depa

rtm

ent

defe

nded

80%

9

0% 1

00%

100

% 1

00%

100

%


Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prov

ide

relia

ble,

inte

grat

ed a

nd s

ecur

ed IC

T in

frast

ruct

ure

and

busi

ness

app

licat

ion

syst

em

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

t Im

plem

enta

tion

of e

nter

pris

e-w

ide

busi

ness

sol

utio

ns, i

nclu

ding

a s

ingl

e vi

ew o

f inm

ates

and

offe

nder

s in

form

atio

n, to

impr

ove

info

rmat

ion

secu

rity

and

inm

ate

and

offen

der i

dent

ifica

tion.

Pr

ovid

e a

secu

red,

relia

ble

and

resp

onsi

ve te

leco

mm

unic

atio

ns a

nd n

etw

ork

infra

stru

ctur

e th

roug

h co

nsol

idat

ion

and

inte

grat

ion

of s

ecur

ity

tech

nolo

gies

into

one

sin

gle

infra

stru

ctur

e pl

atfo

rm.

Just

ifica

tion

Des

ign,

dev

elop

, dep

loy

and

mai

ntai

n sy

stem

s th

at s

uppo

rt b

usin

ess

proc

esse

s

Link

sN

DP,

Cha

pter

12,

Sev

en p

oint

pla

n.

Poin

t 5: E

stab

lish

an in

tegr

ated

and

sea

mle

ss in

form

atio

n an

d te

chno

logy

dat

abas

e or

sys

tem

or b

oth

for t

he n

atio

nal c

rimin

al ju

stic

e sy

stem

Out

put

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Sing

le v

iew

of i

nmat

e an

d off

ende

r inf

orm

atio

nSi

ngle

cap

ture

of

inm

ate

and

offen

der

info

rmat

ion

Core

bus

ines

s pr

oces

ses

map

ped

Proc

urem

ent a

nd

confi

gura

tion

of In

tegr

ated

of

inm

ate

man

agem

ent

syst

em p

hase

1

Confi

gura

tion

of

inte

grat

ed in

mat

e m

anag

emen

t sy

stem

(IIM

S)ph

ase

2

Posi

tive

iden

tifica

tion

of a

n in

mat

e

Inte

grat

ed In

mat

e

Man

agem

ent

Syst

em (I

IMS)

en

hanc

ed

IIMS

enha

nced

Core

ope

rati

ons

supp

ort

syst

ems

Aut

omat

ed

and

Inte

grat

ed

core

ope

ratio

ns

supp

ort s

yste

m

Elec

tron

ic

Mon

itorin

g (E

M)

syst

em p

ilot

impl

emen

ted

Elec

tron

ic

Mon

itorin

g (E

M) s

yste

m

impl

emen

ted

EM s

yste

m

enha

nced

pha

se 1

EM s

yste

m

enha

nced

pha

se 2

EM s

yste

m

enha

nced

pha

se 3

EM s

yste

m

enha

nced

pha

se 4

Cons

olid

ated

ICT

and

com

mun

icat

ion

infr

astr

uctu

re

Cons

olid

ated

ne

twor

k co

mpo

nent

s an

d in

frast

ruct

ure

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

as

the

indi

cato

r w

as in

itiat

ed

durin

g 20

13/2

014

finan

cial

yea

r

Phas

e 1

of L

AN

in

frast

ruct

ure

upgr

aded

VO

IP

Net

wor

k in

frast

ruct

ure

(LA

Ns)

upg

rade

d (5

0 si

tes)

Net

wor

k in

frast

ruct

ure

(LA

Ns)

upg

rade

d (5

0 si

tes)

Net

wor

k in

frast

ruct

ure

(LA

Ns)

upg

rade

d (5

0 si

tes)

Net

wor

k in

frast

ruct

ure

(LA

Ns)

upg

rade

d (5

0 si

tes)

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

er a

rchi

tect

ure

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d ph

ase

1

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

er a

rchi

tect

ure

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d ph

ase

2

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

er a

rchi

tect

ure

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d ph

ase

3

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

er a

rchi

tect

ure

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d ph

ase

4

Inte

grat

ed p

hysi

cal

secu

rity

sys

tem

Cons

olid

ated

an

d in

tegr

ated

ph

ysic

al s

ecur

ity

syst

em

Secu

rity

VPN

as

sess

men

t and

re

quire

men

ts

Secu

rity

virt

ual

priv

ate

netw

ork

(VPN

) ten

der

awar

ded

Secu

rity

VPN

im

plem

ente

dSe

curit

y so

lutio

ns

into

the

Loca

l Are

a N

etw

ork

(LA

N)

inte

grat

ed

Secu

rity

solu

tions

in

to th

e Lo

cal A

rea

Net

wor

k (L

AN

) in

tegr

ated

– p

hase

1

Secu

rity

solu

tions

in

to th

e Lo

cal

Are

a N

etw

ork

(LA

N) i

nteg

rate

d –

phas

e2

Secu

rity

solu

tions

in

to th

e Lo

cal A

rea

Net

wor

k (L

AN

) in

tegr

ated

– p

hase

3


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rA

udit

ed/a

ctua

l per

form

ance

Esti

mat

edpe

rfor

man

ceM

ediu

m-t

erm

targ

ets

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

4.1.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of

case

s br

ough

t ag

ains

t the

de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

80%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

90%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

100%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

100%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

4.1.

2Si

ngle

cap

ture

of

inm

ate

and

offen

der

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Core

bus

ines

s pr

oces

ses

map

ped

Proc

urem

ent a

nd

confi

gura

tion

of

IIMS

of In

mat

e M

anag

emen

t Sy

stem

Pha

se 1

Confi

gura

tion

of In

tegr

ated

of

Inm

ate

Man

agem

ent

Syst

em P

hase

2

Posi

tive

iden

tifica

tion

of

an in

mat

e

4.1.

3A

utom

ated

an

d In

tegr

ated

co

re o

pera

tions

su

ppor

t sys

tem

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

2/20

13.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

2/20

13.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Busi

ness

re

quire

men

ts

deve

lope

d an

d EM

Pi

lot P

hase

EM s

yste

m

impl

emen

ted

pilo

tEM

sys

tem

en

hanc

ed p

hase

1EM

sys

tem

en

hanc

ed p

hase

2EM

sys

tem

en

hanc

ed p

hase

3

4.1.

4Co

nsol

idat

ed

netw

ork

com

pone

nts

and

infra

stru

ctur

e

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

estim

ated

pe

rfor

man

ce

info

rmat

ion

Phas

e 1

of L

AN

in

frast

ruct

ure

upgr

ade

and

VOIP

LAN

s up

grad

ed (5

0 si

tes)

LAN

s up

grad

ed

(50

site

s)

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d du

ring

2013

/201

4 fin

anci

al y

ear,

no h

isto

rical

in

form

atio

n

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

er a

rchi

tect

ure

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d ph

ase

1

A c

entr

alis

ed a

nd

virt

ualis

ed s

erve

rs

arch

itect

ure

impl

emen

ted

ph

ase

2

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

ers

arch

itect

ure

impl

emen

ted

ph

ase

3

4.1.

5Co

nsol

idat

ed

and

inte

grat

ed

phys

ical

sec

urity

sy

stem

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Secu

rity

VPN

as

sess

men

t and

re

quire

men

ts

The

Secu

rity

VPN

te

nder

aw

arde

d S

ecur

ity V

PN

impl

emen

ted

Secu

rity

solu

tions

in

to th

e LA

N

inte

grat

ed

solu

tions

into

the

loca

l are

a ne

twor

k in

tegr

ated

Secu

rity

solu

tions

into

the

LAN

inte

grat

ed


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rRe

port

ing

peri

odA

nnua

l tar

get

2014

/201

5Q

uart

erly

targ

ets

1st2nd

3rd4th

4.1.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e D

epar

tmen

t de

fend

ed

Qua

rter

ly90

% o

f cas

es

brou

ght a

gain

st

the

depa

rtm

ent

defe

nded

90%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

90%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

90%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

90%

of c

ases

br

ough

t aga

inst

th

e de

part

men

t de

fend

ed

4.1.

2Si

ngle

cap

ture

of

inm

ate

and

offen

der

info

rmat

ion

Annu

alPr

ocur

emen

t and

co

nfigu

ratio

n of

in

tegr

ated

inm

ate

man

agem

ent s

yste

m

phas

e 1

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Proc

ured

and

co

nfigu

red

inte

grat

ed o

ffend

er

man

agem

ent s

yste

m

(IIM

S) (p

hase

1)

4.1.

3A

utom

ated

and

In

tegr

ated

cor

e op

erat

ions

sup

port

sy

stem

Annu

ally

EM s

yste

m

impl

emen

ted

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

EM in

tegr

ated

w

ith c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

syst

em

4.1.

4Co

nsol

idat

ed

netw

ork

com

pone

nts

and

infra

stru

ctur

e

Annu

ally

Infra

stru

ctur

e up

grad

edTa

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

lyTa

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

lyTa

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

lyIn

frast

ruct

ure

at p

riorit

ized

si

tes

upgr

aded

as

per

regi

onal

re

quire

men

ts

Annu

ally

A c

entr

alis

ed

and

virt

ualis

ed

serv

er a

rchi

tect

ure

desi

gned

and

im

plem

ente

d ph

ase

1

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

The

cent

ral

virt

ualis

ed s

erve

r ar

chite

ctur

e im

plem

ente

d

4.1.

5Co

nsol

idat

ed a

nd

inte

grat

ed p

hysi

cal

secu

rity

syst

em

Annu

ally

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

se

curit

y VP

N

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Secu

rity

syst

em

cons

olid

ated

ont

o th

e LA

N p

er s

ite


Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Man

agem

ent

653

664

815

682

767

963

1 10

8 84

91

024

926

1 07

6 59

71

158

553

4.2

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: F

inan

ce

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

To

prov

ide

effec

tive

and

effici

ent fi

nanc

ial a

nd s

uppl

y ch

ain

man

agem

ent

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Bu

ildin

g or

gani

satio

nal c

apac

ity fo

r enh

ance

d se

rvic

e de

liver

y

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tTo

pro

vide

effe

ctiv

e an

d effi

cien

t fina

ncia

l and

sup

ply

chai

n m

anag

emen

t

Just

ifica

tion

Ensu

re s

ound

man

agem

ent o

f rev

enue

, exp

endi

ture

, ass

ets

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe.

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Effec

tive

fina

ncia

l m

anag

emen

t – a

ctua

l ex

pend

itur

e an

d re

venu

e to

rem

ain

wit

hin

budg

et

Perc

enta

ge o

f al

loca

ted

budg

et

spen

t

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re

limite

d to

a

quar

ter o

f a p

er

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re

limite

d to

a

quar

ter o

f a p

er

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re

limite

d to

a

quar

ter o

f a p

er

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re

limite

d to

a

quar

ter o

f a p

er

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re

limite

d to

a

quar

ter o

f a p

er

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re

limite

d to

a

quar

ter o

f a p

er

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Unq

ualifi

ed a

udit

op

inio

n ex

pres

sed

by

Aud

itor

-Gen

eral

of

Sout

h A

fric

a (A

GSA

)

Num

ber o

f aud

it qu

alifi

catio

nsO

ne (1

) aud

it qu

alifi

catio

n on

ass

ets

in

2012

/201

3

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

ns

with

a re

duct

ion

of e

mph

asis

of

mat

ters

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

ns

with

a re

duct

ion

of e

mph

asis

of

mat

ters

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

ns w

ith

zero

em

phas

is

of m

atte

rs a

nd a

re

duct

ion

of o

ther

im

port

ant m

atte

rs

Zer

o au

dit

qual

ifica

tions

with

ze

ro e

mph

asis

of

mat

ters

and

a

redu

ctio

n of

oth

er

impo

rtan

t mat

ters

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

ns w

ith

zero

em

phas

is

of m

atte

rs a

nd a

re

duct

ion

of o

ther

im

port

ant m

atte

rs


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Perf

orm

ance

Indi

cato

rA

udit

ed/A

ctua

l per

form

ance

Esti

mat

edpe

rfor

man

ceM

ediu

m-t

erm

targ

ets

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

4.2.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of

allo

cate

d bu

dget

sp

ent

Act

ual

expe

nditu

re o

f R1

4,69

9 bi

llion

in

curr

ed v

ersu

s fin

al a

ppro

pria

tion

of R

15,4

27 b

illio

n w

hich

is 9

5.3%

ex

pend

iture

of

final

app

ropr

iatio

n

Act

ual

expe

nditu

re o

f R1

6,27

7 bi

llion

in

curr

ed v

ersu

s fin

al a

ppro

pria

tion

of R

16,6

87 b

illio

n w

hich

is 9

7.5%

ex

pend

iture

of

final

app

ropr

iatio

n

The

expe

nditu

re

for t

he fi

nanc

ial

year

201

2/20

13

was

R17

,313

bi

llion

ver

sus

the

adju

sted

al

loca

tion

of

R17

700

billi

on –

97

.8%

of b

udge

t sp

ent.

Und

er-

expe

nditu

re o

f vo

ted

fund

s w

as

2.2%

(R38

6.72

9 m

illio

n)

Und

er-

expe

nditu

relim

ited

to a

qua

rter

of

a pe

rcen

t of

vote

d fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

relim

ited

to a

qua

rter

of

a pe

rcen

t of

vote

d fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

relim

ited

to a

qua

rter

of

a pe

rcen

t of

vote

d fu

nds

Und

er-

expe

nditu

relim

ited

to a

qua

rter

of

a pe

rcen

t of

vote

d fu

nds

4.2.

2N

umbe

r of a

udit

qual

ifica

tions

Aud

it Re

port

of

2010

/201

1 ha

d on

e qu

alifi

catio

n

Aud

it Re

port

of

2011

/201

2 ha

d on

e qu

alifi

catio

n

One

(1) a

udit

qual

ifica

tion

on

asse

ts

Info

rmat

ion

will

be

ava

ilabl

e on

ce

audi

t pro

cess

is

final

ised

and

an

audi

t rep

ort i

s re

ceiv

ed fr

om

AG

SA

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

nsw

ith a

redu

ctio

n of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

em

phas

es o

fm

atte

r

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

nsw

ith a

redu

ctio

n of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

em

phas

es o

fm

atte

r

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

nsw

ith a

redu

ctio

n of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

em

phas

es o

fm

atte

r


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rRe

port

ing

peri

odA

nnua

l tar

get

2014

/201

5Q

uart

erly

targ

ets

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

4.2.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of

allo

cate

d bu

dget

sp

ent

Qua

rter

lyU

nder

-exp

endi

ture

lim

ited

to a

qua

rter

of

a p

erce

nt o

f vot

ed

fund

s

Und

er-e

xpen

ditu

re

limite

d to

a q

uart

er

of a

per

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-e

xpen

ditu

re

limite

d to

a q

uart

er

of a

per

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-e

xpen

ditu

re

limite

d to

a q

uart

er

of a

per

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

Und

er-e

xpen

ditu

re

limite

d to

a q

uart

er

of a

per

cent

of v

oted

fu

nds

4.2.

2N

umbe

r of a

udit

qual

ifica

tions

Bi-a

nnua

llyZe

ro a

udit

qual

ifica

tions

with

a re

duct

ion

of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

emph

ases

of

mat

ter

Zer

o au

dit

qual

ifica

tions

with

a re

duct

ion

of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

emph

ases

of

mat

ter

Zer

o au

dit

qual

ifica

tions

with

a re

duct

ion

of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

emph

ases

of

mat

ter

Zero

aud

it qu

alifi

catio

nsw

ith a

redu

ctio

n of

in

the

num

ber o

f em

phas

es o

fm

atte

r

Zer

o au

dit

qual

ifica

tions

with

a re

duct

ion

of

in th

e nu

mbe

r of

emph

ases

of

mat

ter

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Fina

nce

1 01

6 37

487

6 46

892

8 63

61

014

637

939

552

1 00

9 05

31

041

135


4.3

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: C

orp

ora

te S

ervi

ces

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

To

impr

ove

hum

an re

sour

ce c

apac

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t to

enab

le th

e de

part

men

t to

fulfi

ll its

man

date

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Bu

ildin

g or

gani

satio

nal c

apac

ity fo

r enh

ance

d se

rvic

e de

liver

yPr

ofes

sion

alis

ing

for e

ffect

ive

hum

an re

sour

ces

man

agem

ent a

nd d

evel

opm

ent

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tBu

ild o

rgan

isat

iona

l cap

acity

for e

nhan

ced

serv

ice

deliv

ery

by e

nsur

ing

98%

of t

he fu

nded

pos

ts a

re fi

lled

annu

ally

Cont

ribut

e to

a p

ositi

ve, m

otiv

ated

and

hea

lthy

wor

kfor

ce b

y ro

lling

out

the

Inte

grat

ed E

mpl

oyee

Hea

lth a

nd W

elln

ess

(IEH

W) P

rogr

amm

e by

12

man

agem

ent a

nnua

lly.

Just

ifica

tion

This

obj

ectiv

e w

ill e

nsur

e th

at th

ere

is e

ffect

ive

hum

an re

sour

ce c

apac

ity a

nd m

anag

emen

t to

enab

le th

e de

part

men

t to

fulfi

ll its

man

date

.

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

cans

are

and

feel

saf

e N

DP

chap

ter 1

3: B

uild

ing

a ca

pabl

e an

d de

velo

pmen

t sta

te

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

Targ

ets

per a

nnum

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Filli

ng o

f vac

ant p

osts

Perc

enta

ge o

f fu

nded

pos

ts fi

lled

97%

(4

0 74

6/ 4

200

6).

98%

(4

1 15

3/ 4

2 00

6)98

%

(41

153/

42

006)

98%

(4

1 15

3/ 4

2 00

6)98

%

(41

153/

42

006)

98%

(4

1 15

3/ 4

2 00

6)

Offi

cial

s tr

aine

d in

line

w

ith

the

Wor

kpla

ce

Skill

s Pl

an (W

SP)

Num

ber o

f offi

cial

s tr

aine

d in

line

with

th

e W

SP

15 0

00 o

ffici

als

trai

ned

in li

ne w

ith

the

WSP

16 5

00

18 1

50

19 9

65

21 9

62

24

158

A p

osit

ive,

mot

ivat

ed

and

heal

thy

wor

kfor

ce

enab

ling

the

depa

rtm

ent t

o ac

hiev

e it

s ob

ject

ives

und

er th

e au

spic

es o

f em

ploy

ee

heal

th a

nd w

elln

ess

(EH

W).

Num

ber o

f m

anag

emen

t ar

eas

whe

re

inte

grat

ed

empl

oyee

he

alth

and

w

elln

ess

(IEH

W)

prog

ram

mes

ro

lled

out

IEH

W ro

lled

out

in 5

man

agem

ent

area

s pe

r yea

r

1010

1112

12


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rA

udit

ed/a

ctua

l per

form

ance

Esti

mat

edpe

rfor

man

ceM

ediu

m-t

erm

targ

ets

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

4.3.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of

fund

ed p

osts

fille

d84

,7%

96,7

%97

%

97%

(4

0 74

6/ 4

2 00

6)98

%

(41

153/

42

006)

98%

(4

1 15

3/ 4

2 00

6)98

%

(41

153/

42

006)

4.3.

2N

umbe

r of

offici

als

trai

ned

in

line

with

the

WSP

29 9

78

22 9

66

14 1

00

15 0

00

16 5

00

18 1

50

19 9

65

4.3.

3N

umbe

r of

man

agem

ent

area

s w

here

IEH

W

prog

ram

mes

ro

lled

out

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

1/20

12.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

510

10.

1010

11

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rRe

port

ing

peri

odA

nnua

l tar

get

2014

/201

5Q

uart

erly

targ

ets

1st2nd

3rd4th

4.3.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of f

unde

d po

sts

fille

dA

nnua

lly

98%

(4

1 15

3/ 4

2 00

6)Ta

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

ly

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Ta

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

ly

98%

(4

1 15

3/ 4

2 00

6)

4.3.

2N

umbe

r of o

ffici

als

trai

ned

in li

ne w

ith

WSP

Qua

rter

ly16

500

2

500

6 00

06

000

2 00

0

4.3.

3N

umbe

r of

man

agem

ent

area

s w

here

IEH

W

prog

ram

mes

rolle

d ou

t

Qua

rter

ly

102

3 2

3

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Corp

orat

e Se

rvic

es96

0 86

61

639

108

1 24

5 97

81

371

973

1 47

6 56

91

567

715

1 70

7 42

9


5.

pRo

gR

am

me

2: in

Ca

RC

eRa

tio

n

Prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

app

ropr

iate

ser

vice

s an

d w

ell-m

aint

aine

d ph

ysic

al in

frast

ruct

ure

that

sup

port

s sa

fe a

nd s

ecur

ed c

ondi

tions

of d

eten

tion

cons

iste

nt w

ith th

e hu

man

di

gnity

of

inm

ates

, per

sonn

el a

nd t

he p

ublic

, and

pro

vide

for

the

pro

filin

g of

inm

ates

and

the

com

pila

tion

of n

eed-

base

d co

rrec

tiona

l sen

tenc

e pl

ans,

adm

inis

trat

ion

and

inte

rven

tions

.

5.1

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: S

ecu

rity

Op

erat

ion

s

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

saf

e an

d se

cure

con

ditio

ns fo

r inm

ates

, con

sist

ent w

ith h

uman

dig

nity

.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

RDs

and

offen

ders

are

hel

d in

sec

ure,

saf

e an

d hu

man

e co

nditi

ons.

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tTo

ens

ure

that

offe

nder

s ar

e he

ld in

sec

ure,

saf

e an

d hu

man

e co

nditi

ons,

by re

duci

ng th

e nu

mbe

r of e

scap

es, a

llege

d as

saul

ts a

nd u

nnat

ural

dea

ths

of in

mat

es b

y 20

% o

ver t

he n

ext fi

ve y

ears

.

Just

ifica

tion

The

depa

rtm

ent u

ses

over

crow

ding

, unn

atur

al d

eath

s, as

saul

ts a

nd e

scap

es to

det

erm

ine

the

cond

ition

of c

orre

ctio

nal s

ervi

ce fa

cilit

ies

to im

prov

e th

e pr

ovis

ion

of s

afe

and

a se

cure

env

ironm

ent t

o in

mat

es

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe.

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rBa

selin

e20

13/2

014

Targ

ets

per a

nnum

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Impr

oved

sec

ured

an

d sa

fe c

usto

dy o

f al

l inm

ates

Perc

enta

ge o

f inm

ates

al

lege

dly

assa

ulte

d in

co

rrec

tiona

l and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per

year

2,0

%

(3 1

17/1

55 8

36)

4,1%

(6

325

/154

278

)3,

9%

(5 9

56/1

52 7

35)

3,7%

(5 5

94/1

51 2

08)

3,5%

(5 2

39/1

49 6

96)

3,4%

(5

038

/148

199

)

Perc

enta

ge o

f unn

atur

alde

aths

in c

orre

ctio

nal a

nd

rem

and

dete

ntio

nfa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

0,03

6%(5

6/15

5 83

6)0,

035%

(54/

154

278)

0,03

4%

(52/

152

735)

0,03

3%(5

0/15

1 20

8)0,

032%

(4

8/14

9 69

6)0,

031%

(4

6/14

8 19

9)

Perc

enta

ge o

f inm

ates

w

ho e

scap

e fro

m

corr

ectio

nal a

nd re

man

d de

tent

ion

faci

litie

s pe

r ye

ar

0,03

2%(5

0/15

5 83

6)0,

026%

(4

0/15

4 27

8)0,

025%

(3

8/15

2735

)0,

024%

(3

6/15

1 20

8)0,

023%

(3

4/14

9 69

6)0,

022%

(3

3/14

8 19

9)


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

5.1.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

esal

lege

dly

assa

ulte

d in

corr

ectio

nal a

nd re

man

d de

tent

ion

faci

litie

spe

r yea

r

3,1%

(5

043

/161

021

)3,

3%

(5 2

84/1

60 1

03

4,5%

(6 8

84/1

51 5

17)

2,0%

(3

117

/155

836

)4,

1%

(6 3

25/1

54 2

78)

3,9%

(5

956

/152

735

)3,

7%(5

594

/151

208

)

5.1.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of u

nnat

ural

de

aths

in c

orre

ctio

nal

and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

0,03

%(5

1/16

1 02

1)0,

03%

(4

6/16

0 10

3)

0,03

8%

(57/

151

517)

0,

036%

(56/

155

836)

0,03

5%(5

4/15

4 27

8)0,

034%

(52/

152

735)

0,03

3%(5

0/15

1 20

8)

5.1.

3Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

who

esc

ape

from

co

rrec

tiona

l and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per

year

0,06

5 %

(1

06/1

61 0

21)

0,03

%

(41/

160

103)

0,

028%

(4

3/15

1 51

7) 0

,032

%(5

0/15

5 83

6)0,

026%

(40/

154

278)

0,02

5%(3

8/15

2 73

5)0,

024%

(36/

151

208)

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5.1.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

alle

gedl

y as

saul

ted

in

corr

ectio

nal a

nd re

man

d de

tent

ion

faci

litie

s pe

r ye

ar

Qua

rter

ly4,

1%(6

325

/154

278

)1,

025%

(1 5

82/1

54 2

78)

1,02

5%(1

581

/154

278

)1,

025%

(1 5

81/1

54 2

78)

1,02

5%(1

581

/154

278

)

5.1.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of u

nnat

ural

de

aths

in c

orre

ctio

nal

and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

Qua

rter

ly0,

035%

(54/

154

278)

0,00

9%

(14/

154

278)

0,00

9 %

(14/

154

278

0,00

8%

(13/

154

278)

0,00

8%

(13/

154

278)

5.1.

3Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

who

esc

ape

from

co

rrec

tiona

l and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per

year

Qua

rter

ly0,

026%

(40/

154

278)

0,00

65%

(10/

154

278)

0,00

65%

(10/

154

278)

0,00

65%

(10/

154

278)

0,00

65%

(10/

154

278)


Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Secu

rity

Ope

rati

ons

4 38

9 71

64

742

643

5 74

6 23

35

677

192

6 23

0 78

36

550

543

6 96

1 32

9

5.2

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: F

acili

ties

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

phy

sica

l inf

rast

ruct

ure

that

sup

port

s sa

fe c

usto

dy, h

uman

e co

nditi

ons,

and

the

prov

isio

n of

cor

rect

iona

l and

dev

elop

men

t pro

gram

mes

, car

e an

d ge

nera

l adm

inis

trat

ion.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

Ann

ual t

arge

ts fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

RDs

and

offen

ders

are

hel

d in

sec

ure,

saf

e an

d hu

man

e co

nditi

ons

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

t To

cre

ate

5 78

7 ad

ditio

nal b

ed s

pace

s in

the

next

five

yea

rs a

nd s

uppo

rt a

men

ities

that

are

con

duci

ve to

reha

bilit

atio

n an

d hu

man

e in

carc

erat

ion

of in

mat

es.

Just

ifica

tion

The

depa

rtm

ent m

ust p

rovi

de p

hysi

cal i

nfra

stru

ctur

e th

at s

uppo

rts

safe

cus

tody

, hum

ane

cond

ition

s, an

d th

e pr

ovis

ion

of c

orre

ctio

nal a

nd

deve

lopm

ent p

rogr

amm

es, c

are

and

gene

ral a

dmin

istr

atio

n.

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe.

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

In

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Faci

litie

s co

nduc

ive

to re

habi

litat

ion

and

hum

ane

inca

rcer

atio

n of

in

mat

es

Num

ber o

f new

bed

-sp

aces

cre

ated

by

upgr

adin

g of

faci

litie

s pe

r yea

r

Nil

1 08

151

83

149

39

1 00

0


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

5.2.

1 N

umbe

r of n

ew b

ed-

spac

es c

reat

ed b

y up

grad

ing

of fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

Nil

346

Nil

Nil

1 08

151

83

149

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5.2.

1 N

umbe

r of n

ew

bed-

spac

es c

reat

ed b

y up

grad

ing

of fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

Annu

ally

1 08

1 Ta

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

ly

Targ

et m

easu

red

annu

ally

Ta

rget

mea

sure

d an

nual

ly

1 08

1

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

11/2

012

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Faci

litie

s2

795

333

2 94

0 03

33

380

091

3 51

0 50

33

676

234

3 84

3 66

44

038

542


5.3

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: R

eman

d D

eten

tio

n

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

ens

ure

the

effec

tive

and

effici

ent r

eman

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent b

y ca

rryi

ng o

ut c

ourt

dec

isio

ns a

nd a

ccom

mod

atio

n of

RD

s in

saf

e an

d se

cure

fa

cilit

ies

cons

iste

nt w

ith a

Hum

an R

ight

s en

viro

nmen

t

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Eff

ecti

ve m

anag

emen

t of r

eman

d de

tent

ion

proc

ess

to p

rom

ote

and

enab

le p

arti

cipa

tion

in c

ourt

pro

cess

es.

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tIm

prov

e m

anag

emen

t of r

eman

d de

tent

ion

proc

esse

s by

det

aini

ng R

Ds

in s

ecur

e, s

afe

and

hum

ane

cond

ition

s w

hils

t pro

mot

ing

and

crea

ting

an

envi

ronm

ent t

hat s

uppo

rts

part

icip

atio

n in

crim

inal

just

ice

proc

esse

s.

Just

ifica

tion

This

obj

ectiv

e en

sure

s th

at re

man

d de

tent

ion

proc

esse

s ar

e eff

ectiv

ely

man

aged

, and

that

RD

s ar

e he

ld in

saf

e, s

ecur

e an

d hu

man

e co

nditi

on.

Link

sC

hapt

er 1

2 of

the

ND

P 20

30: B

uild

ing

safe

r com

mun

ities

O

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r Ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Rem

and

Det

aine

es

have

con

diti

ons

cond

uciv

e to

pa

rtic

ipat

ion

in C

ourt

Pr

oces

ses

Ope

rati

onal

po

licie

s al

igne

d w

ith

the

Whi

te P

aper

on

Rem

and

Det

enti

on

App

rove

d W

hite

Pa

per o

n Re

man

d D

eten

tion

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y an

d pr

oced

ure

man

ual o

n re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

App

rove

d po

licy

and

proc

edur

e m

anua

l on

rem

and

dete

ntio

n m

anag

emen

t

App

rove

d pr

oced

ure

man

ual o

n re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rA

udit

ed/a

ctua

l per

form

ance

Esti

mat

edpe

rfor

man

ceM

ediu

m-t

erm

targ

ets

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

5.3.

1O

pera

tiona

l po

licie

s al

igne

d w

ith th

e W

hite

Pa

per o

n Re

man

d D

eten

tion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Dra

ft re

gula

tions

w

ere

appr

oved

by

Parli

amen

t

App

rove

d dr

aft

Whi

te P

aper

fo

r ext

erna

l co

nsul

tatio

n

App

rove

d dr

aft

Whi

te P

aper

on

Rem

and

Det

entio

n

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y on

rem

and

dete

ntio

n m

anag

emen

t

App

rove

d po

licy

on re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

App

rove

d po

licy

proc

edur

e m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of R

Ds

to c

ourt

bas

ed

on th

e le

ngth

of

dete

ntio

n

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual o

n re

ferr

al

of te

rmin

ally

ill

or s

ever

ely

inca

paci

tate

d RD

s to

cou

rt

App

rove

d po

licy

proc

edur

e m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

term

inal

ly

ill o

r sev

erel

y in

capa

cita

ted

RDs

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Fina

l dra

ft

priv

ilege

sys

tem

fo

r RD

s

App

rove

d pr

ivile

ge s

yste

m

for R

Ds

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Fina

l dra

ft

disc

iplin

ary

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r RD

s

App

rove

d di

scip

linar

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual

for t

he R

Ds

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual

for u

nifo

rm o

f RD

s

App

rove

d po

licy

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r uni

form

of R

Ds

Impl

emen

tatio

n an

d m

onito

ring


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5.3.

1O

pera

tiona

l Pol

icie

s al

igne

d w

ith th

e W

hite

Pap

er o

n Re

man

d D

eten

tion

Qua

rter

ly

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y on

re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

Dra

ft p

olic

y on

re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

deve

lope

d

Dra

ft p

olic

y on

re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

cons

ulte

d w

ith th

ree

regi

ons

(Lim

popo

/ M

pum

alan

ga/

Nor

th-

Wes

t (LM

N),

Wes

tern

Ca

pe a

nd F

ree

Stat

e/N

orth

ern

Cape

(F

SNC

)

Dra

ft p

olic

y on

re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

cons

ulte

d w

ith th

ree

regi

ons

(Gau

teng

, Kw

aZul

u-N

atal

(KZN

), Ea

ster

n Ca

pe)

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y on

re

man

d de

tent

ion

man

agem

ent

App

rove

d po

licy

proc

edur

e m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of R

Ds

to

cour

t bas

ed o

n th

e le

ngth

of d

eten

tion

Dra

ft p

roce

dure

m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

RDs

to c

ourt

bas

ed

on th

e le

ngth

of

dete

ntio

n de

velo

ped

Dra

ft p

roce

dure

m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

RDs

to c

ourt

bas

ed

on th

e le

ngth

of

dete

ntio

n co

nsul

ted

with

thre

e re

gion

s (L

MN

, Wes

tern

Cap

e an

d FS

NC

)

Dra

ft p

roce

dure

m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

RDs

to c

ourt

bas

ed

on th

e le

ngth

of

dete

ntio

n co

nsul

ted

with

thre

e re

gion

s (G

aute

ng, K

ZN,

East

ern

Cape

)

App

rove

d po

licy

proc

edur

e m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of R

Ds

to

cour

t bas

ed o

n th

e le

ngth

of d

eten

tion

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual o

n re

ferr

al o

f ter

min

ally

ill

or s

ever

ely

inca

paci

tate

d RD

s to

co

urt

Dra

ft p

roce

dure

m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

term

inal

ly

ill o

r sev

erel

y in

capa

cita

ted

RDs

deve

lope

d

Dra

ft p

roce

dure

m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

term

inal

ly

ill o

r sev

erel

y in

capa

cita

ted

RDs

cons

ulte

d w

ith L

MN

, W

este

rn C

ape

and

FSN

C)

Dra

ft p

roce

dure

m

anua

l on

refe

rral

of

term

inal

ly

ill o

r sev

erel

y in

capa

cita

ted

RDs

cons

ulte

d w

ith

Gau

teng

, KZN

, and

Ea

ster

n Ca

pe

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual o

n re

ferr

al o

f ter

min

ally

ill

or s

ever

ely

inca

paci

tate

d RD

s

Fina

l dra

ft p

rivile

ge

Syst

em fo

r RD

sD

raft

priv

ilege

sys

tem

fo

r RD

s de

velo

ped

Dra

ft p

rivile

ge s

yste

m

for R

Ds

cons

ulte

d w

ith L

MN

, Wes

tern

Ca

pe, a

nd F

SNC

Dra

ft p

rivile

ge s

yste

m

for R

Ds

cons

ulte

d w

ith G

aute

ng, K

ZN,

and

East

ern

Cape

Fina

l dra

ft p

rivile

ge

Syst

em fo

r RD

s

Fina

l dra

ft d

isci

plin

ary

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r the

RD

s

Dra

ft d

isci

plin

ary

proc

edur

e m

anua

l for

th

e RD

s de

velo

ped

Dra

ft d

isci

plin

ary

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r the

RD

s co

nsul

ted

with

3 re

gion

s (L

MN

, W

este

rn C

ape

and

FSN

C)

Dra

ft d

isci

plin

ary

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r the

RD

s co

nsul

ted

with

Gau

teng

, KZN

, an

d Ea

ster

n Ca

pe

Fina

l dra

ft d

isci

plin

ary

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r the

RD

s


Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5.3.

1O

pera

tiona

l Pol

icie

s al

igne

d w

ith th

e W

hite

Pap

er o

n Re

man

d D

eten

tion

Qua

rter

lyFi

nal d

raft

pol

icy

proc

edur

e m

anua

l fo

r uni

form

of R

Ds

Dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual

for u

nifo

rm o

f RD

s de

velo

ped

Dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual

for u

nifo

rm o

f RD

s co

nsul

ted

with

LM

N,

Wes

tern

Cap

e an

d FS

NC

Dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual

for u

nifo

rm o

f RD

s co

nsul

ted

LMN

, W

este

rn C

ape

and

FSN

C

Fina

l dra

ft p

olic

y pr

oced

ure

man

ual

for u

nifo

rm o

f Re

man

d D

etai

nees

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Rem

and

dete

ntio

n59

7 26

159

9 96

724

7 59

970

8 18

874

1 14

178

1 68

785

3 42

0

5.4

Sub

-Pro

gra

mm

e: O

ffen

der

Man

agem

ent

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

an

envi

ronm

ent s

uppo

rtiv

e of

the

reha

bilit

atio

n an

d sa

fety

of o

ffend

ers

thro

ugh

regu

lar c

lass

ifica

tion,

ass

essm

ent,

com

pila

tion

of c

orre

ctio

nal

sent

ence

pla

ns, a

nd e

ffect

ive

adm

inis

trat

ion

and

oper

atio

ns in

wel

l mai

ntai

ned

faci

litie

s.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Sub

Prog

ram

me

OFF

END

ER M

AN

AG

EMEN

TSt

rate

gic

Obj

ecti

veEff

ectiv

e ca

se m

anag

emen

t pro

cess

esO

utpu

tsPr

ovid

e an

env

ironm

ent

supp

ortiv

e of

the

reha

bilit

atio

n an

d sa

fety

of o

ffend

ers

thro

ugh

regu

lar c

lass

ifica

tion,

ass

essm

ent,

effec

tive

adm

inis

trat

ion

and

oper

atio

ns in

wel

l mai

ntai

ned

faci

litie

s.

Just

ifica

tion

This

obj

ectiv

e en

sure

s th

at fa

cilit

ies

are

effec

tivel

y ad

min

iste

red

and

oper

ated

, tha

t ove

rcro

wdi

ng c

ontr

olle

d.

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

In

dica

tor

Base

line

(201

3/20

14)

Targ

ets

per A

nnum

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9Im

prov

ed le

vel o

f ov

ercr

owdi

ng in

co

rrec

tion

al fa

cilit

ies

Perc

enta

ge o

f ov

ercr

owdi

ng

in c

orre

ctio

nal

cent

res

and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

in e

xces

s of

offi

cial

ca

paci

ty

30%

(3

5 74

0/11

9 13

4)29

%(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)28

%(3

3 62

8/12

0 09

9)27

%(3

3 27

7/12

3 24

8)26

%(3

2 05

5/12

3 28

7)25

%(3

1 07

2/12

4 28

7)


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

5.4.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of

over

crow

ding

in

corr

ectio

nal c

entr

es

and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

in e

xces

s of

offi

cial

ca

paci

ty

34,8

7%(4

1 24

0/11

8 15

4)35

,6%

(42

481/

118

154)

28,7

%(3

3 95

3/11

8 50

0)30

%

(35

740/

119

134)

29%

(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)28

%

(33

628/

120

099)

27%

(33

277/

123

248)

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

Perf

orm

ance

In

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual T

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

5.4.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of

over

crow

ding

in

corr

ectio

nal c

entr

es

and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies

per y

ear

in e

xces

s of

offi

cial

ca

paci

ty

Qua

rter

ly29

%(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)29

%(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)29

%(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)29

%(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)29

%(3

5 11

4/11

9 16

4)

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Off

ende

r man

agem

ent

1 33

8 35

11

500

165

1 62

0 85

71

631

186

1 65

0 87

91

748

954

1 85

5 39

4


6.

pRo

gR

am

me

3: R

eha

bil

ita

tio

n*

Prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

inm

ates

with

nee

ds-b

ased

pro

gram

mes

and

inte

rven

tions

to fa

cilit

ate

thei

r reh

abili

tatio

n an

d en

able

thei

r soc

ial r

eint

egra

tion

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

O

ffend

ers’

pers

onal

dev

elop

men

t is

impr

oved

thro

ugh

liter

acy,

edu

catio

n an

d sk

ills

com

pete

ncy

prog

ram

mes

Effec

tive

inca

rcer

atio

n an

d re

habi

litat

ion

to p

rote

ct s

ocie

ty.

Offe

ndin

g, b

ehav

ior i

s ta

rget

ed th

roug

h ac

cess

to c

orre

ctio

nal p

rogr

amm

es a

nd p

sych

olog

ical

, soc

ial a

nd s

pirit

ual s

ervi

ces.

Offe

nder

s hu

man

dev

elop

men

t is

impr

oved

thro

ugh

liter

acy,

edu

catio

n an

d sk

ills

com

pete

ncy

prog

ram

mes

Re

duce

d re

offen

ding

to c

ontr

ibut

e to

a s

afer

Sou

th A

frica

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tPr

ovid

e pr

ogra

mm

es a

nd s

ervi

ces

to o

ffend

ers

to in

crea

se th

eir l

evel

of e

duca

tion

and

skill

s ac

quis

ition

.To

pro

vide

psy

chol

ogic

al, s

ocia

l and

spi

ritua

l ser

vice

s to

ass

ist i

n th

e re

habi

litat

ion

of o

ffend

ers

and

thei

r rei

nteg

ratio

n ba

ck in

to s

ocie

ty.

Just

ifica

tion

This

pro

gram

me

is g

earin

g to

war

ds p

repa

ring

offen

ders

for t

he e

vent

ual r

elea

se. P

rovi

ding

edu

catio

nal,

corr

ectio

nal a

nd s

kills

dev

elop

men

t pr

ogra

mm

es, a

s w

ell a

s ps

ycho

logi

cal,

soci

al a

nd s

pirit

ual c

are

serv

ices

hel

p off

ende

rs im

prov

e th

eir r

eent

ry in

to c

omm

uniti

es.

Link

sO

utco

me

1: Im

prov

e th

e qu

ality

of b

asic

edu

catio

nO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe

Out

com

e 5:

Ski

lled

and

capa

ble

wor

k fo

rce

to s

uppo

rt a

n in

clus

ive

grow

th p

ath

ND

P ch

apte

rs 3

, 9 a

nd 1

2

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Incr

ease

d le

vel

of e

duca

tion

and

sk

ills

acqu

isit

ion

of

offen

ders

Perc

enta

ge o

f off

ende

rs w

ho

part

icip

ate

ined

ucat

iona

l pr

ogra

mm

es

mea

sure

d ag

ains

t th

e en

rolm

ent

regi

ster

per

ac

adem

ic y

ear

56,8

%(9

720

/17

100)

Adu

lt ed

ucat

ion

and

trai

ning

(AET

)

80%

(11

007/

12 5

09)

AET

80%

(11

007/

13 7

60)

AET

80%

(12

108/

15 1

36)

AET

80%

(13

319/

16 6

50)

AET

80%

(14

651/

18 3

15)

AET

1,6%

(638

/39

966)

Furt

her e

duca

tion

and

trai

ning

(FET

) m

ains

trea

m

80%

(498

/622

)80

%(5

48/6

84)

80%

(603

/752

)80

%(6

63/8

27)

80%

(729

/910

)

* Pe

rfor

man

ce in

dica

tors

are

pub

lishe

d at

pro

gram

me

leve

l


Incr

ease

d le

vel

of e

duca

tion

and

sk

ills

acqu

isit

ion

of

offen

ders

Perc

enta

ge o

f off

ende

rs w

ho

part

icip

ate

in s

kills

de

velo

pmen

t pr

ogra

mm

es

mea

sure

d ag

ains

t th

e lis

t of o

ffend

ers

regi

ster

ed fo

r pa

rtic

ipat

ion

(enr

olm

ent

regi

ster

).

50,2

5%

(4 1

88/8

334

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(4 2

87/5

359

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(4 7

16/5

894

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(5 1

87/6

483

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(5 7

05/7

131)

Skill

s tr

aini

ng

80%

(6 2

75/7

844)

Skill

s tr

aini

ng

33,9

0%

(3 5

25/1

0 39

6)FE

T Co

llege

80%

(2 5

76/3

222

)FE

T Co

llege

80%

(2 8

35/3

544

)FE

T Co

llege

80%

(3 1

19/3

898

)FE

T Co

llege

80%

(3 4

30/4

288

)FE

T Co

llege

80%

(3 7

73/4

717

)FE

T Co

llege

Impr

oved

men

tal

wel

lbei

ng, s

ocia

l and

sp

irit

ual f

unct

ioni

ng

of o

ffen

ders

Perc

enta

ge o

f in

mat

es w

ho

are

invo

lved

in

psyc

holo

gica

l se

rvic

es

13%

(20

865/

157

410)

14%

(21

599/

154

278)

15%

(22

910/

15 2

73)

16%

(24

193/

151

208)

17%

(25

448/

149

696)

18%

(26

676/

148

199)

Perc

enta

ge

offen

ders

who

are

in

volv

ed in

soc

ial

wor

k se

rvic

es

99%

(1

0 40

7/10

533

)57

%(1

02 7

32/1

80 2

33)

67%

(124

040

/185

135

)67

%(1

27 6

69/1

90 5

52)

77%

(151

325

/196

526

)76

%(1

54 3

59/2

03 1

05)

Perc

enta

ge o

f in

mat

es w

ho

bene

fit fr

om

spiri

tual

ser

vice

s

49,5

7%

(83

198/

167

816)

54%

(8

3 31

0/15

4 27

8)

56%

(8

5 53

2/15

2 73

5)57

%

(86

189/

151

208)

59%

(88

321/

149

696

)60

%(8

8 91

9/14

8 19

9)


6.1.

Su

b-p

rog

ram

me

per

form

ance

ind

icat

ors

an

d a

nn

ual

tar

get

s fo

r 20

14/2

015

– 20

16/2

017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

6.1.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of

offen

ders

who

pa

rtic

ipat

e in

ed

ucat

iona

l pr

ogra

mm

es

mea

sure

d ag

ains

t the

en

rolm

ent r

egis

ter p

er

acad

emic

yea

r

69,8

%(1

2 05

1/17

273

)A

ET

65,4

%(1

1 29

6/17

273

)A

ET

56,8

%(9

720

/17

100)

AET

67,2

%(1

1 37

2/16

929

)A

ET

80%

(10

007/

12 5

09)

AET

80%

(11

007/

13 7

60)

AET

80%

(12

108/

15 1

36)

AET

12%

(4 8

44/4

0 37

0)FE

T m

ains

trea

m

1,4%

(546

/40

370)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

1,6%

(638

/39

966)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

1,4%

(565

/39

566)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

80%

(498

/622

)FE

T m

ains

trea

m

80%

(548

/684

)FE

T m

ains

trea

m

80%

(603

/752

)FE

T m

ains

trea

m

6.1.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of

offen

ders

who

pa

rtic

ipat

e in

ski

lls

deve

lopm

ent

prog

ram

mes

m

easu

red

agai

nst

the

list o

f offe

nder

s re

gist

ered

for

part

icip

atio

n (e

nrol

men

t reg

iste

r).

14,1

6%(5

036

/35

571)

Skill

s tr

aini

ng

18,9

2%

(7 0

58/3

7 30

3)Sk

ills

trai

ning

50,2

5%(4

188

/8 3

34)

Skill

s tr

aini

ng

28,7

%(4

872

/16

954)

Skill

s tr

aini

ng

80%

(4 2

87/5

359

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(4 7

16/5

894

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(5 1

87/6

483

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

FET

colle

geN

ew ta

rget

–

info

rmat

ion

avai

labl

e fro

m

2012

/201

3

FET

colle

geN

ew ta

rget

–

info

rmat

ion

avai

labl

e fro

m

2012

/201

3

33,9

0%(3

525

/10

396)

FET

colle

ge

13,6

%(2

929

/21

427)

FET

colle

ge

80%

(2 5

76/3

222

)FE

T co

llege

80%

(2 8

35/3

544

)FE

T co

llege

80%

(3 1

19/3

898

)FE

T co

llege

6.1.

3Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

who

are

invo

lved

in

psyc

holo

gica

l ser

vice

s

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

2/20

13.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

2/20

13.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

13%

(20

865/

157

410)

5% im

prov

emen

t in

the

num

ber

inm

ates

who

ar

e in

volv

ed in

ps

ycho

logi

cal

serv

ices

aga

inst

th

e ba

selin

e of

20

12/2

013

14%

(21

599/

154

278)

15%

(22

910/

152

735)

16%

(24

193/

151

208)


Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

6.1.

4Pe

rcen

tage

offe

nder

s w

ho a

re in

volv

ed in

so

cial

wor

k se

rvic

es

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

2/20

13.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

54%

(4

0 46

9/75

517

) 99

%

(104

073

/104

533

)57

%

(98

449/

172

718)

57%

(1

02 7

32/1

80 2

33)

67%

(1

24 0

40/1

85 1

35)

67%

(1

27 6

69/1

90 5

52)

6.1.

5Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

who

ben

efit f

rom

sp

iritu

al s

ervi

ces

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

2/20

13.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

49,4

9%

(83

198/

167

816)

70,3

8%

(106

478

/151

298

)52

%

(81

035/

155

836)

54%

(8

3 31

0/15

4 27

8)56

%

(85

532/

152

735)

57%

(8

6189

/151

208

)

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

6.1.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of

offen

ders

who

pa

rtic

ipat

e in

ed

ucat

iona

l pr

ogra

mm

es

mea

sure

d ag

ains

t th

e lis

t of o

ffend

ers

regi

ster

ed fo

r pa

rtic

ipat

ion

(enr

olm

ent r

egis

ter)

per a

cade

mic

yea

r

Annu

ally

(aca

dem

ic

year

)80

%(1

0 00

7/12

509

)A

ET

80%

(10

007/

12 5

09)

AET

80%

(10

007/

12 5

09)

AET

80%

(10

007/

12 5

09)

AET

80%

(11

007/

13 7

60)

AET

80%

(4

98/6

22)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

80%

(4

98/6

22)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

80%

(4

98/6

22)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

80%

(4

98/6

22)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

80%

(5

48/6

84)

FET

mai

nstr

eam

6.1.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of

offen

ders

who

pa

rtic

ipat

e in

ski

lls

deve

lopm

ent

prog

ram

mes

m

easu

red

agai

nst

the

list o

f offe

nder

s re

gist

ered

for

part

icip

atio

n (e

nrol

men

t reg

iste

r).

Fina

ncia

l yea

r80

%(4

287

/5 3

59)

Skill

s tr

aini

ng

80%

(4 2

87/5

359

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(4 2

87/5

359

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(4 2

87/5

359

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

80%

(4 2

87/5

359

)Sk

ills

trai

ning

Acad

emic

yea

r80

%(2

576

/3 2

22)

FET

colle

ge

80%

(2 5

76/3

222

)FE

T co

llege

80%

(2 5

76/3

222

)FE

T co

llege

80%

(2 5

76/3

222

)FE

T co

llege

80%

(2 8

35/3

544

)FE

T co

llege


Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

6.1.

3Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

who

are

invo

lved

in

psyc

holo

gica

l ser

vice

s

Qua

rter

ly

14%

(21

599/

154

278)

3,5%

(5 4

00/1

54 2

78)

3,5%

(5 4

00/1

54 2

78)

3,5%

(5 4

00/1

54 2

78)

3,49

%(5

3 99

/154

278

)

6.1.

4Pe

rcen

tage

offe

nder

s w

ho a

re in

volv

ed in

so

cial

wor

k se

rvic

es

Qua

rter

ly

57%

(1

02 7

32/1

80 2

33)

14%

(2

5 23

2/18

0 23

3)14

%

(25

232/

180

233)

14%

(2

5 23

2/18

0 23

3)15

% (2

7 03

6/18

0 23

3)

6.1.

5Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

who

ben

efit f

rom

sp

iritu

al s

ervi

ces

Qua

rter

ly

54%

(83

310/

154

278)

13,5

%(2

0 82

7/15

4 27

8)13

,5%

(20

827/

154

278)

13,5

%(2

0 82

8/15

4 27

8)13

,5%

(20

828/

154

278)

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Reha

bilit

atio

n 75

2 73

780

8 15

284

1 62

61

077

287

1 16

5 76

31

237

000

1 33

3 45

1


7.

pRo

gR

am

me

4: C

aR

e

Prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

nee

ds-b

ased

car

e se

rvic

es to

mai

ntai

n th

e pe

rson

al w

ellb

eing

of a

ll in

mat

es in

the

depa

rtm

ent’s

cus

tody

.

7.1

Su

b-p

rog

ram

me:

Nu

trit

ion

al S

ervi

ces

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

inm

ates

with

app

ropr

iate

nut

ritio

nal s

ervi

ces

cons

iste

nt w

ith h

ealth

nor

ms

and

stan

dard

s as

defi

ned

in th

e nu

triti

on p

olic

y.

Sub

Prog

ram

me:

Nut

ritio

nal S

ervi

ces

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

In

mat

es a

re p

rovi

ded

with

app

ropr

iate

nut

ritio

nal s

ervi

ces

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tTo

pro

vide

inm

ates

with

app

ropr

iate

nut

ritio

nal s

ervi

ces

to im

prov

e th

eir n

utrit

iona

l sta

tus

Just

ifica

tion

To c

ompl

y w

ith in

tern

atio

nal,

natio

nal a

nd d

epar

tmen

tal l

egis

latio

n an

d po

licie

s th

e de

part

men

t is

oblig

ed to

pro

vide

ser

vice

s th

at w

ill im

prov

e th

e nu

triti

onal

sta

tus

of a

ll in

mat

es a

nd b

abie

s of

inca

rcer

ated

wom

en th

roug

h pr

omot

ion

of h

ealth

y lif

esty

les

and

prov

isio

n of

inte

grat

ed a

nd h

igh

qual

ity n

utrit

ion

serv

ices

.

Link

sO

utco

me

2: A

long

and

hea

lthy

life

for a

ll So

uth

Afri

cans

. N

DP

Cha

pter

10.

Pro

mot

ing

heal

th

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Impr

oved

nut

riti

onal

st

atus

Perc

enta

ge o

f th

erap

eutic

die

ts

pres

crib

ed fo

r in

mat

es

No

base

line.

New

indi

cato

r10

%(1

5 42

8/15

4 27

8)10

%(1

5 27

4/15

2 73

5)10

%(1

5 12

1/15

1 20

8)10

%(1

49 7

0/14

9 69

6)10

%(1

4 82

0/14

8 19

9)

Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rA

udit

ed/a

ctua

l per

form

ance

Esti

mat

edpe

rfor

man

ceM

ediu

m-t

erm

targ

ets

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

7.1

Perc

enta

ge o

f th

erap

eutic

die

ts

pres

crib

ed fo

r in

mat

es

New

indi

cato

r N

ew in

dica

tor

New

indi

cato

r N

ew in

dica

tor

10%

(15

428/

154

278)

10%

(15

274/

152

735)

10%

(15

121/

151

208)


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

7.1.

1Pe

rcen

tage

of

ther

apeu

tic d

iets

pr

escr

ibed

for i

nmat

es

Qua

rter

ly

10%

(15

428/

154

278)

2,5%

(3 8

57/1

54 2

78)

5%(7

714

/154

278

)7.

5%(1

1 57

0/15

4 27

8)10

%(1

5 42

8/15

4 27

8)

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Nut

riti

onal

ser

vice

s81

5 92

982

8 79

81

004

001

825

637

923

163

974

954

1 02

2 17

3

7.2

Su

b-p

rog

ram

me:

Hea

lth

Ser

vice

s

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

inm

ates

with

acc

ess

to a

ppro

pria

te h

ealth

care

ser

vice

s in

acc

orda

nce

with

app

licab

le h

ealth

nor

ms

and

stan

dard

s.

Sub-

prog

ram

me:

Hea

lth s

ervi

ces

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

In

mat

es a

re p

rovi

ded

with

hea

lthca

re s

ervi

ces

to im

prov

e lif

e ex

pect

ancy

Sc

ale

up p

reve

ntio

n in

terv

entio

ns to

redu

ce n

ew H

IV a

nd tu

berc

ulos

is in

fect

ions

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tTo

pro

vide

inm

ates

with

hea

lthca

re s

ervi

ces

in o

rder

to im

prov

e th

eir l

ife e

xpec

tanc

y.

Just

ifica

tion

To c

ompl

y w

ith in

tern

atio

nal,

Nat

iona

l Dep

artm

ent o

f Hea

lth a

nd D

epar

tmen

tal l

egis

latio

n an

d po

licie

s, th

e de

part

men

t is

oblig

ed to

pro

vide

se

rvic

es th

at w

ill im

prov

e th

e he

alth

sta

tus

and

life

expe

ctan

cy o

f all

inm

ates

and

bab

ies

of in

carc

erat

ed w

omen

, thr

ough

com

batin

g H

IV,

tube

rcul

osis

(TB)

, sex

ual t

rans

mitt

ed il

lnes

ses

(STI

s) a

nd o

ther

acu

te a

nd c

hron

ic c

ondi

tions

.

Link

sO

utco

me

2: A

long

and

hea

lthy

life

for a

ll So

uth

Afri

cans

.N

DP:

Cha

pter

10.

Pro

mot

ing

heal

th

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

In

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9


Incr

ease

life

exp

ecta

ncy

Com

bat H

IV a

nd A

ids

and

decr

ease

the

burd

en

of d

isea

ses

from

TB

Perc

enta

ge o

f in

mat

es te

sted

fo

r HIV

50%

(77

918/

155

836)

70%

(107

995

/15

4 27

8)80

%

(122

188

/ 15

2 73

5)90

%

(136

087

/ 15

1 20

8)90

%

(134

726

/ 14

9 69

6)

90%

(13

379/

148

199)

Perc

enta

ge

of in

mat

es o

n an

tiret

rovi

ral

ther

apy

(ART

) (c

umul

ativ

e)

94%

(16

577/

17 6

36)

95%

(19

158/

20

166)

96%

(21

788/

22

696)

97%

(24

469/

25 2

26)

98%

(27

201/

27

756)

98%

(2

9 68

0/30

286

)

TB (n

ew

pulm

onar

y) c

ure

rate

75%

(4 6

75/

6 23

3)80

%(4

937

/6 1

71)

85%

(5 1

93/6

109

)85

%(5

141

/ 6

048)

85%

(5

089

/5 9

88)

85%

(5

038

/5 9

28)

Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

7.2.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

test

ed fo

r HIV

32,6

5%(5

2 57

3/ 1

61 0

21)

42,5

%

(67

409/

158

577)

50%

(7

6 20

2/15

1 90

6)

50%

(77

918/

155

836)

70%

(107

995

/154

278

)80

%

(122

188

/152

735

)90

%

(136

087

/151

208

)

7.2.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

on A

RT (c

umul

ativ

e)98

,9%

(8

091

/8 1

78)

69 %

(6

095

/8 8

19)

96 %

(1

1 81

4/12

321

)94

%(1

6 57

7/17

636

)95

%(1

9 15

8/20

166

)96

%(2

1 78

8/22

696

)97

%(2

4 46

9/25

226

)

7.2.

3TB

(new

pul

mon

ary)

cu

re ra

te

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Indi

cato

r ini

tiate

d in

201

3/20

14.

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

75%

(4 6

75/6

233

)80

%(4

937

/6 1

71)

85%

(5 1

93/6

109

)85

%(5

141

/6 0

48)


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

7.2.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

test

ed fo

r HIV

Qua

rter

ly

70%

(107

995

/154

278

) 1

7%

(26

227/

154

278)

17%

(2

6 22

7/15

4 27

8) 1

8%

(27

770/

154

278)

18%

(2

7 77

1/15

42 7

8)

7.2.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of i

nmat

es

on A

RT (c

umul

ativ

e)Q

uart

erly

95

%(1

9 15

8/20

166

)95

%(4

790

/5 0

42)

95%

(9 5

79/1

0 09

8)95

%(1

43 6

9/15

125

)95

%(1

9 15

8/20

166

)

7.2.

3TB

(new

pul

mon

ary)

cu

re ra

te

Qua

rter

ly

80%

(4

937

/6 1

71)

80%

(1

234

/1 5

43)

80%

(2

468

/3 0

86)

80%

(3

702

/4 6

29)

80%

(4

937

/6 1

71)

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Hea

lth

serv

ices

507

708

518

867

584

311

657

221

693

978

748

213

779

723

7.3

Sub

-pro

gra

mm

e: H

ygie

ne

serv

ices

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

per

sona

l and

env

ironm

enta

l hyg

iene

ser

vice

s fo

r inm

ates

with

in th

e co

rrec

tiona

l cen

tres

and

rem

and

dete

ntio

n fa

cilit

ies.

Sub

Prog

ram

me:

Hyg

iene

ser

vice

s

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

In

mat

es a

re p

rovi

ded

with

app

ropr

iate

hyg

ieni

c se

rvic

es

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tTo

pro

vide

inm

ates

with

sui

tabl

e hy

gien

e se

rvic

es to

mai

ntai

n th

eir h

ealth

and

per

sona

l wel

lbei

ng

Just

ifica

tion

To c

ompl

y w

ith in

tern

atio

nal,

natio

nal a

nd d

epar

tmen

tal l

egis

latio

n an

d po

licie

s th

e de

part

men

t is

oblig

ed to

pro

vide

ser

vice

s th

at w

ill im

prov

e th

e he

alth

and

hyg

iene

sta

tus

of a

ll in

mat

es a

nd b

abie

s of

inca

rcer

ated

wom

en to

impr

ove

the

life

Link

sO

utco

me

2: A

long

and

hea

lthy

life

for a

ll So

uth

Afri

cans

.N

DP:

Cha

pter

10.

Pro

mot

ing

heal

th

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r Ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Incr

ease

life

ex

pect

ancy

N

umbe

r of

man

agem

ent a

reas

w

ith c

ontr

acte

d he

alth

care

was

te

serv

ices

186

66

66


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

7.3.

1 N

umbe

r of

man

agem

ent

area

s w

ith c

ontr

acte

dhe

alth

care

was

te

serv

ices

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

11

18

6 6

6

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

7.3.

1 N

umbe

r of

man

agem

ent

area

s w

ith c

ontr

acte

dhe

alth

care

was

te

serv

ices

Qua

rter

ly

6 1

1 2

2

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Hyg

iene

Ser

vice

s93

283

135

326

80 5

6113

4 15

013

0 08

512

9 00

113

6 95

6


8. p

Ro

gR

am

me

5: s

oC

ial

Rei

nte

gR

ati

on

Prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

ser

vice

s fo

cuse

d on

offe

nder

s’ pr

epar

atio

n fo

r rel

ease

, effe

ctiv

e su

perv

isio

n of

offe

nder

s pl

aced

und

er th

e sy

stem

of c

omm

unity

cor

rect

ions

and

the

faci

litat

ion

of th

eir s

ocia

l re-

inte

grat

ion

into

thei

r com

mun

ities

.

8.1

Sub

-Pro

gra

mm

e: P

aro

le A

dm

inis

trat

ion

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

ser

vice

s re

late

d to

the

cons

ider

atio

n of

pla

cem

ent o

f offe

nder

s in

to c

omm

unity

cor

rect

ions

by

corr

ectio

nal s

uper

visi

on a

nd p

arol

e bo

ards

and

he

ads

of c

orre

ctio

nal c

entr

es.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Eff

ectiv

e m

anag

emen

t and

func

tioni

ng o

f cor

rect

iona

l sup

ervi

sion

and

par

ole

boar

ds

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tFa

cilit

ate

offen

ders

’ rei

nteg

ratio

n in

to c

omm

uniti

es b

y en

surin

g th

at e

ligib

le c

ases

sub

mitt

ed b

y ca

se m

anag

emen

t com

mitt

ees

are

cons

ider

ed

timel

y an

d ap

prop

riate

ly b

y co

rrec

tiona

l sup

ervi

sion

and

par

ole

boar

ds.

Just

ifica

tion

This

obj

ectiv

e w

ill e

nsur

e th

at th

ere

is e

ffect

ive

func

tioni

ng a

nd m

anag

emen

t of c

orre

ctio

nal s

uper

visi

on a

nd p

arol

e bo

ards

. Soc

ial r

eint

egra

tion

is c

ritic

al a

nd n

eces

sary

for s

uper

visi

on o

f pro

batio

ners

. The

aim

is to

faci

litat

e su

cces

sful

rein

tegr

atio

n in

to th

e co

mm

unity

.

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2014

/201

5M

ediu

m-t

erm

targ

ets

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Incr

ease

d pe

rcen

tage

of

cas

es c

onsi

dere

d by

pa

role

boa

rd

Perc

enta

ge o

f cas

es

subm

itted

by

the

case

man

agem

ent

com

mitt

ees

(CM

Cs)

an

d co

nsid

ered

by

paro

le b

oard

94%

(42

338/

44 8

78)

95%

(42

634/

44 8

78)

96%

(43

083/

44

878

97%

(43

532/

44 8

78)

98%

(43

980/

44 8

78)

99%

(44

429/

44 8

78)

Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

8.1.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of c

ases

su

bmitt

ed b

y C

MC

s an

d co

nsid

ered

by

paro

le b

oard

s.

No

hist

oric

al d

ata

No

hist

oric

al d

ata

No

hist

oric

al d

ata

94%

(42

338/

44 8

78)

95%

(42

634/

44 8

78)

96%

(43

083/

44 8

7897

%(4

3 53

2/44

878

)


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

tQ

uart

erly

targ

ets

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

8.1.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of c

ases

su

bmitt

ed b

y C

MC

s an

d co

nsid

ered

by

paro

le b

oard

s

Qua

rter

ly95

%(4

2 63

4/44

878

)95

%(1

0 65

8/11

219

)95

%(1

0 65

8/11

219

)95

%(1

0 65

9/11

220

)95

%(1

0 65

9/11

220

)

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Paro

le A

dmin

istr

atio

n58

374

64 9

4862

980

102

732

110

513

118

324

126

116

8.2.

Su

b-P

rog

ram

me:

Su

per

visi

on

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

for t

he s

ound

and

effe

ctiv

e ad

min

istr

atio

n an

d su

perv

isio

n of

offe

nder

s pl

aced

und

er c

orre

ctio

nal a

nd p

arol

e su

perv

isio

n in

ord

er to

enh

ance

pu

blic

saf

ety.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Pr

obat

ione

rs a

nd p

arol

ees

are

reha

bilit

ated

, mon

itore

d an

d ac

cept

ed a

s la

w a

bidi

ng c

itize

ns b

y th

e co

mm

uniti

es.

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Prom

ote

publ

ic s

afet

y an

d se

curit

y by

pro

vidi

ng s

ervi

ces

and

inte

rven

tion

that

will

ens

ure

that

offe

nder

s pl

aced

und

er c

orre

ctio

nal a

nd p

arol

e su

perv

isio

n ad

here

to th

eir p

arol

e/pr

obat

ion

cond

ition

s

Just

ifica

tion

The

depa

rtm

ent u

ses

paro

le a

nd p

roba

tion

viol

atio

ns to

det

erm

ine

effec

tive

rein

tegr

atio

n of

offe

nder

s in

to c

omm

uniti

es, a

nd to

dev

elop

and

im

plem

ent n

ew m

easu

res

to in

crea

se c

ompi

latio

n to

par

ole/

prob

atio

n co

nditi

ons

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

can

are

and

feel

saf

eN

DP

Cha

pter

12:

Bui

ldin

g sa

fer c

omm

uniti

esD

raft

Med

ium

Ter

m S

trat

egic

Fra

mew

ork

(MTS

F) 2

014/

2019


Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r Ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Pers

ons

unde

r th

e sy

stem

of

com

mun

ity

corr

ecti

ons

are

succ

essf

ully

re

inte

grat

ed

Perc

enta

ge o

f pa

role

es w

ithou

t vi

olat

ions

79,6

%(3

8 76

8/48

703

)80

,9%

(44

247/

54 6

94)

81,9

%(4

8 78

1/59

562

)82

,9%

(53

771/

64 8

63)

83,9

%(5

9 26

3/70

635

) 84

,9%

(65

307/

76 9

22)

Perc

enta

ge o

f pr

obat

ione

rs w

ithou

t vi

olat

ions

80%

(13

560/

16 9

50)

81%

(14

211/

17 5

45)

82%

(15

300/

18 6

59)

83%

(16

470/

19 8

44)

84%

(17

727/

21 1

04)

85%

(19

077/

22 4

44)

Num

ber o

f pe

rson

s (p

arol

ees,

prob

atio

ners

and

aw

aitin

g tr

ial p

erso

ns

[ATP

s]) p

lace

d un

der a

n el

ectr

onic

m

onito

ring

syst

em

(EM

S)

150

500

1 0

001

000

1 00

01

000

Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

Perf

orm

ance

In

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

8.2.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of p

arol

ees

with

out v

iola

tions

74,9

%(2

8 16

9/37

609

)76

,1%

(35

819/

47 0

95)

84,8

9%(3

9 26

9/46

259

)79

,6%

(38

768/

48 7

03)

80,9

%(4

4 24

7/54

694

)81

,9%

(48

781/

59 5

62)

82,9

%(5

3 77

1/64

863

)

8.2.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of

prob

atio

ners

with

out

viol

atio

ns

No

hist

oric

alin

form

atio

nN

o hi

stor

ical

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

alin

form

atio

n80

%

(13

560/

16 9

50)

81%

(14

211/

17 5

45)

82%

(15

300/

18 6

59)

83%

(16

470/

19 8

44)

8.2.

3N

umbe

r of

pers

ons

(par

olee

s, pr

obat

ione

rs a

nd A

TPs

plac

ed u

nder

EM

S

Busi

ness

cas

ean

d ad

dend

umto

bus

ines

s ca

se

deve

lope

d bu

t no

t app

rove

d

App

oint

men

t of

serv

ice

prov

ider

an

d pi

lot p

roje

ct

mob

ilisa

tion

and

test

ing

136

paro

lees

w

ere

unde

r EM

S on

the

31 M

arch

20

13 a

t sel

ecte

d co

mm

unity

co

rrec

tions

offi

ces

in W

C,

FS/N

C, E

C, K

ZN,

LMN

, and

GP

Prep

arat

ion

and

EM ro

llout

and

im

plem

enta

tion

and

plac

emen

t of

500

offe

nder

s un

der E

M

500

1 00

01

000


Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

8.2.

1 Pe

rcen

tage

of p

arol

ees

with

out v

iola

tions

Qua

rter

lyIn

crea

se th

e nu

mbe

r of

par

olee

s w

ithou

t vi

olat

ion

from

79.

9%

to 8

0.9%

(4

4 24

7/54

694

)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

arol

ees

with

out

viol

atio

n by

0,2

5% to

80

.15

(43

837/

54 6

94)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

arol

ees

with

out

viol

atio

n by

0.2

5%

to 8

0.4

(43

973/

54 6

94)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

arol

ees

with

out

viol

atio

n by

0.2

5% to

80

.65

(44

110/

54 6

94)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

arol

ees

with

out

viol

atio

n by

0.2

5 to

80

.9(4

4 24

7/54

694

)

8.2.

2Pe

rcen

tage

of

prob

atio

ners

with

out

viol

atio

ns

Qua

rter

lyIn

crea

se th

e nu

mbe

r of

pro

batio

ners

w

ithou

t vio

latio

n fro

m 8

0% to

81%

(1

4 21

1/17

545

)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

roba

tione

rs

with

out v

iola

tion

by

0,25

% to

80.

25%

(14

079/

17

545)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

roba

tione

rs

with

out v

iola

tion

by

0,25

% to

80.

5%(1

4 12

4/17

545

)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

roba

tione

rs

with

out v

iola

tion

by

0,25

% to

80.

75%

(14

168/

17

545)

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

roba

tione

rs

with

out v

iola

tion

by

0,25

% to

81%

(14

211/

17

545)

8.2.

3N

umbe

r of

pers

ons

(par

olee

s, pr

obat

ione

rs a

nd

ATPs

) pl

aced

und

er

EMS

Qua

rter

ly50

0

Aw

ard

EM te

nder

Ro

ll-ou

t EM

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

erso

ns (p

arol

ees,

prob

atio

ners

, and

AT

Ps p

lace

d un

der

EMS

from

150

to 3

50

Incr

ease

the

num

ber

of p

erso

ns (p

arol

ees,

prob

atio

ners

, and

AT

Ps p

lace

d un

der

EMS

from

350

to 5

00

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Supe

rvis

ion

492

456

546

083

552

516

625

195

692

218

738

039

777

612


8.3.

Su

b-p

rog

ram

me:

Co

mm

un

ity

Rei

nte

gra

tio

n

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Pro

vide

and

faci

litat

e su

ppor

t sys

tem

s fo

r the

rein

tegr

atio

n of

offe

nder

s in

to s

ocie

ty.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

Pr

obat

ione

rs a

nd p

arol

ees

are

reha

bilit

ated

, mon

itore

d an

d ac

cept

ed a

s la

w a

bidi

ng c

itize

ns b

y th

e co

mm

uniti

es.

Offe

nder

s ar

e pr

ovid

ed w

ith a

cces

s to

rest

orat

ive

just

ice

prog

ram

me

Obj

ecti

ve s

tate

men

tFa

cilit

ate

offen

der r

eint

egra

tion

into

soc

iety

by

crea

ting

supp

ort s

yste

m a

nd p

rovi

ding

rest

orat

ive

just

ice

prog

ram

mes

that

con

trib

ute

to

acce

ptan

ce o

f offe

nder

s an

d he

alin

g vi

ctim

s w

ithin

com

mun

ities

.

Just

ifica

tion

Redu

ce re

-offe

ndin

g th

roug

h re

stor

ed re

latio

nshi

p am

ong

vict

ims,

offen

ders

and

the

com

mun

ity to

enh

ance

soc

ial s

tabi

lity

Link

sO

utco

me

3: A

ll pe

ople

in S

outh

Afri

ca a

re a

nd fe

el s

afe

ND

P C

hapt

er 1

2: B

uild

ing

safe

r com

mun

ities

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Pers

ons

unde

r sy

stem

of c

omm

unit

y co

rrec

tion

s ar

e re

inte

grat

ed

Num

ber o

f par

olee

s re

inte

grat

ed th

roug

h ha

lfway

hou

se

part

ners

hip

5080

110

140

170

200

Num

ber o

f vic

tims

and

offen

ders

who

pa

rtic

ipat

ed in

re

stor

ativ

e ju

stic

e pr

ogra

mm

es (v

ictim

off

ende

r med

iatio

n -V

OM

; vic

tim o

ffend

er

dial

ogue

- VO

D)

1 75

0 vi

ctim

s/

23 9

21 o

ffend

ers

2 00

0 vi

ctim

s/23

921

off

ende

rs2

250

vict

ims/

23

921

offe

nder

s 2

500

vict

ims

/ 23

921

offe

nder

s2

750

vict

ims/

23

921

offen

ders

3 00

0 vi

ctim

s/

23 9

21 o

ffend

ers


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

8.3.

1 N

umbe

r of p

arol

ees

rein

tegr

ated

thro

ugh

halfw

ay h

ouse

pa

rtne

rshi

ps

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

Polic

y a

nd

proc

edur

e fra

mew

ork

deve

lope

d

Roll

out S

LAs

for s

ix h

alfw

ay

hous

es

80

110

140

8.3.

2N

umbe

r of v

ictim

s an

d off

ende

rs w

ho

part

icip

ated

in

rest

orat

ive

just

ice

prog

ram

mes

(vic

tim

offen

der m

edia

tion

-VO

M; v

ictim

offe

nder

di

alog

ue -

VOD

)

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

8 VO

Ds

2 00

0 vi

ctim

s/

23 9

21 o

ffend

ers

2 25

0 vi

ctim

s/

23 9

21 o

ffend

ers

2 50

0 vi

ctim

s/

23 9

21 o

ffend

ers

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

8.3.

1 N

umbe

r of p

arol

ees

rein

tegr

ated

thro

ugh

halfw

ay h

ouse

pa

rtne

rshi

ps

Qua

rter

ly50

1313

12

12

8.3.

2N

umbe

r of v

ictim

s an

d off

ende

rs w

ho

part

icip

ated

in

rest

orat

ive

just

ice

prog

ram

mes

(vic

tim

offen

der m

edia

tion

-VO

M; v

ictim

offe

nder

di

alog

ue -

VOD

)

Qua

rter

ly2

000

vict

ims/

23 9

21

offen

ders

500

vict

ims/

5 98

0 off

ende

rs

500

vict

ims/

5 98

0 off

ende

rs

500

vict

ims/

5 98

0 off

ende

rs

500

vict

ims/

5 98

1 off

ende

rs


Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Com

mun

ity

rein

tegr

atio

n18

579

21 3

1733

537

39 4

8841

459

43 5

8846

074

8.4.

Su

b-p

rog

ram

me:

Offi

ce a

cco

mm

od

atio

n: C

om

mu

nit

y co

rrec

tio

ns

Sub-

prog

ram

me

purp

ose:

Fac

ilita

te th

e pr

ovis

ion

of c

omm

unity

cor

rect

ions

offi

ces

to e

nhan

ce c

omm

unity

rein

tegr

atio

n.

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive

and

annu

al ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15 –

201

6/20

17

Stra

tegi

c O

bjec

tive

O

ffend

ers

are

prov

ided

with

acc

ess

to c

omm

unity

cor

rect

ion

serv

ices

Obj

ecti

ve S

tate

men

tEn

hanc

e ac

cess

ibili

ty o

f com

mun

ity c

orre

ctio

n se

rvic

es b

y de

cent

raliz

ing

exis

ting

com

mun

ity c

orre

ctio

n offi

ces

and

esta

blis

hing

new

co

mm

unity

cor

rect

ion

serv

ice

poin

ts

Just

ifica

tion

This

obj

ectiv

e w

ill fa

cilit

ate

com

mun

ity re

inte

grat

ion

by p

rom

otin

g ac

cess

to c

omm

unity

cor

rect

ion

serv

ices

Link

sLi

nkag

es to

Out

com

e 12

/ N

DP

Out

com

e 3

Out

puts

Perf

orm

ance

In

dica

tor

Base

line

2013

/201

4Ta

rget

s pe

r ann

um

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

720

17/2

018

2018

/201

9

Impr

oved

adm

inis

trat

ion

and

supe

rvis

ion

of p

erso

ns u

nder

th

e sy

stem

of c

omm

unit

y co

rrec

tion

s w

ill le

ad to

: •

Redu

ctio

n of

re-o

ffen

ding

•Cr

ime

prev

enti

on •

Succ

essf

ul re

inte

grat

ion

Dec

entr

alis

atio

n of

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n se

rvic

es

211

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n offi

ces

Twel

ve (1

2)

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n se

rvic

e po

ints

es

tabl

ishe

d w

ithin

exi

stin

g co

mm

unity

co

rrec

tion

office

s

Incr

ease

num

ber

of c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts

by fo

ur

Incr

ease

num

ber

of c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts

by s

ix

Incr

ease

num

ber

of c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts b

y

eigh

t

Incr

ease

num

ber

of c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts b

y

ten


Sub-

prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

indi

cato

rs a

nd a

nnua

l tar

gets

for 2

014/

2015

– 2

016/

2017

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Aud

ited

/act

ual p

erfo

rman

ceEs

tim

ated

perf

orm

ance

Med

ium

-ter

m ta

rget

s

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

8.4.

1D

ecen

tral

isat

ion

of

com

mun

ity c

orre

ctio

n se

rvic

es

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

No

hist

oric

al

info

rmat

ion

App

rove

d co

ncep

t do

cum

ent o

n th

e de

cent

raliz

atio

n of

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

ns

serv

ices

Twel

ve (1

2)co

mm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts

esta

blis

hed

with

in e

xist

ing

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n offi

ces

Incr

ease

num

ber

of c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts to

four

per

re

gion

Incr

ease

num

ber

of c

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts s

ix p

er

regi

on

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s fo

r 201

4/20

15

Prog

ram

me

perf

orm

ance

in

dica

tor

Repo

rtin

g pe

riod

Ann

ual t

arge

t20

14/2

015

Qua

rter

ly ta

rget

s

1st

2nd

3rd

4th

8.4.

1D

ecen

tral

isat

ion

of

com

mun

ity c

orre

ctio

n se

rvic

es

Qua

rter

lyTw

elve

(12)

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n se

rvic

e po

ints

est

ablis

hed

with

in e

xist

ing

com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n offi

ces

Thre

e (3

) com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n se

rvic

e po

ints

est

ablis

hed

Thre

e (3

) com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n se

rvic

e po

ints

est

ablis

hed

Thre

e (3

) com

mun

ity

corr

ectio

n se

rvic

e po

ints

est

ablis

hed

Thre

e (3

) cc

omm

unity

co

rrec

tion

serv

ice

poin

ts e

stab

lishe

d

Expe

nditu

re e

stim

ates

Prog

ram

me

Aud

ited

out

com

eA

djus

ted

budg

etM

ediu

m-t

erm

exp

endi

ture

est

imat

e

R th

ousa

nd20

10/2

011

2011

/201

220

12/2

013

2013

/201

420

14/2

015

2015

/201

620

16/2

017

Offi

ce a

ccom

mod

atio

n:

com

mun

ity

corr

ecti

ons

21 9

4023

037

19 6

0435

000

42 0

4044

226

46 6

69

50

PART C

51

LINKS TO THE OTHER PLANS


Part

c: L

inks

to o

ther

pla

ns: t

he lo

ng-t

erm

infra

stru

ctur

e an

d ot

her

ca

pita

l pla

nsCu

rren

tSe

rvic

e de

liver

y st

age

Proj

ect s

tage

Proj

ecte

d co

mpl

etio

n da

te

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Kim

berle

y co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

3 00

0 be

ds,

supp

ort a

men

ities

, de

velo

pmen

t and

ca

re fa

cilit

ies,

office

s, an

d cl

inic

pro

vide

d;

inte

grat

ed IT

in

stal

led

Han

dove

r20

09/1

2/02

986

453

1 52

03

084

--

--

Wor

cest

er,

Bran

dvle

i co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

346

addi

tiona

l be

ds in

per

man

ent

stru

ctur

es to

repl

ace

tem

pora

ry st

ruct

ures

, su

ppor

t am

eniti

es,

deve

lopm

ent a

nd

care

faci

litie

s, an

d cl

inic

pro

vide

d

Han

dove

r20

12/1

0/11

386

790

139

694

32 0

8712

374

--

--

Vanr

hyns

dorp

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

328

addi

tiona

l bed

s, su

ppor

t am

eniti

es,

and

adm

inis

trat

ion

and

visi

tatio

n bl

ock

prov

ided

Cons

truc

tion

2014

/03/

3127

8 46

475

000

49 9

1419

537

--

--


Curr

ent

Serv

ice

deliv

ery

stag

ePr

ojec

t sta

gePr

ojec

ted

com

plet

ion

date

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Cere

s, W

arm

bokk

evel

d co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

282

addi

tiona

l bed

s, su

ppor

t am

eniti

es,

and

deve

lopm

ent

and

care

faci

litie

s pr

ovid

ed; e

xist

ing

dila

pida

ted

stru

ctur

es u

pgra

ded

Cons

truc

tion

2014

/03/

3123

1 63

666

000

30 9

3040

912

--

--

Burg

ersd

orp

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

311

addi

tiona

l bed

s, su

ppor

t am

eniti

es,

and

deve

lopm

ent

and

care

faci

litie

s pr

ovid

ed; e

xist

ing

dila

pida

ted

stru

ctur

es u

pgra

ded

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

298

000

--

-1

000

38 1

2835

000

90 0

00

Estc

ourt

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

309

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed

Cons

truc

tion

2015

/04/

2523

0 00

09

000

10 7

7016

646

92 5

0047

500

70 0

0095

000

Tzan

een

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

435

addi

tiona

l bed

s, su

ppor

t am

eniti

es,

and

deve

lopm

ent

and

care

faci

litie

s pr

ovid

ed

Cons

truc

tion

2015

/03/

3126

4 00

056

000

65 5

5567

761

715

--

-

Ingw

avum

a co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

212

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s fo

r mal

es p

rovi

ded;

ol

d st

ruct

ures

re

furb

ishe

d

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

278

000

3 00

020

120

2-

15 0

0025

000

60 0

00

Zeer

ust

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

500

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

230

000

2 50

053

684

-9

914

20 0

0045

000

Non

gom

a co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

191

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed; h

erita

ge

build

ing

rest

ored

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

219

000

3 00

06

601

1 51

870

000

30 5

0020

000

45 0

00


Curr

ent

Serv

ice

deliv

ery

stag

ePr

ojec

t sta

gePr

ojec

ted

com

plet

ion

date

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Nka

ndla

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

153

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed; h

erita

ge

build

ing

rest

ored

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

225

000

3 00

012

2-

34 5

1950

000

20 0

0045

000

Map

hum

ulo

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

33 a

dditi

onal

bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed; h

erita

ge

part

s of

exi

stin

g bu

ildin

g re

stor

ed

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

89 0

00-

1 10

3-

31 0

9830

000

--

Stan

dert

on

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

787

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed

Tend

erN

ot s

tart

ed32

8 03

213

900

23 2

771

552

80 4

0764

419

65 0

0080

000

Pret

oria

, C-M

ax

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

12 a

dditi

onal

bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed; s

ecur

ity

upgr

aded

Cons

truc

tion

2014

/05/

3113

1 00

09

228

31 8

5535

920

48 6

861

000

--

Pary

s co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

176

addi

tiona

l bed

s, su

ppor

t am

eniti

es,

and

deve

lopm

ent

and

care

faci

litie

s pr

ovid

ed; e

xist

ing

dila

pida

ted

stru

ctur

es u

pgra

ded

Des

ign

Not

sta

rted

94 3

9827

122

--

30 0

0035

500

10 0

0010

185

New

cast

le

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

186

addi

tiona

l bed

s an

d su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed

Iden

tifica

tion

Not

sta

rted

100

000

--

-52

0-

20 0

00-

Lich

tenb

urg

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e up

grad

ed, i

nclu

ding

23

4 ad

ditio

nal b

eds

prov

ided

Cons

truc

tion

Not

sta

rted

220

000

--

66 5

8162

861

62 0

0070

000

85 0

00

Potc

hefs

troo

m

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e up

grad

ed, i

nclu

ding

76

1 ad

ditio

nal b

eds

prov

ided

Vario

usN

ot s

tart

ed90

0 00

0-

--

9 32

7-

70 0

0030

000


Curr

ent

Serv

ice

deliv

ery

stag

ePr

ojec

t sta

gePr

ojec

ted

com

plet

ion

date

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Berg

ville

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

Corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e up

grad

ed, i

nclu

ding

6

cells

ere

cted

(39

ad

ditio

nal b

eds)

and

su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed

Vario

usN

ot s

tart

ed39

004

-81

316

5-

--

-

Mat

atie

le

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e up

grad

ed, i

nclu

ding

10

cel

ls e

rect

ed (2

4 ad

ditio

nal b

eds)

and

su

ppor

t fac

ilitie

s pr

ovid

ed; h

erita

ge

part

s of

exi

stin

g bu

ildin

g re

stor

ed

Des

ign

2014

/12/

1760

701

5 50

82

975

23 7

05-

19 9

00-

-

Odi

cor

rect

iona

l ce

ntre

Cons

truc

tion

of a

ne

w a

cces

s co

ntro

l ga

te a

nd v

isito

rs’

wai

ting

room

s pr

ovid

ed

Cons

truc

tion

2013

/03/

209

800

3 76

86

941

2 15

1-

--

-

Paro

le b

oard

offi

ces

53 p

arol

e bo

ard

office

s co

mpl

eted

co

nstr

ucte

d

Cons

truc

tion

2012

/12/

3114

0 23

818

666

6 98

32

282

--

--

Inde

pend

ent

Dev

elop

men

t Tr

ust

Perim

eter

sec

urity

fe

ncin

g an

d in

terc

oms

inst

alle

d;

imm

ovab

le a

sset

m

anag

emen

t aud

its

cond

ucte

d

Cons

truc

tion

2014

/02/

2851

3 00

0-

85 9

5826

4 86

311

992

28 3

7870

000

-

Rem

and

dete

ntio

n fe

asib

ility

stu

dies

Feas

ibili

ty s

tudi

es fo

r re

man

d de

tent

ion

faci

litie

s co

mpl

eted

Des

ign

Vario

us

date

s30

000

10 0

00-

--

13 0

00-

-

Hea

d offi

ceFe

asib

ility

stu

dy fo

r a

new

hea

d offi

ce

build

ing

com

plet

ed

Iden

tifica

tion

3

000

1 00

066

--

--

-


Curr

ent

Serv

ice

deliv

ery

stag

ePr

ojec

t sta

gePr

ojec

ted

com

plet

ion

date

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Aud

it of

faci

litie

sCo

rrec

tiona

l cen

tre

faci

litie

s au

dite

d in

com

plia

nce

with

Gov

ernm

ent

Imm

ovab

le A

sset

M

anag

emen

t Act

(2

007)

Des

ign

IDT

Phas

e 1

Not

sta

rted

15 0

001

000

--

--

--

Kim

berle

y,

Bran

dvle

i, Ce

res,

Vanr

hyns

dorp

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

s

Inte

grat

ed IT

sys

tem

s in

stal

led

Vario

usVa

rious

da

tes

63 0

007

000

--

--

--

King

W

illia

mst

own

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e up

grad

edVa

rious

Not

sta

rted

6 00

0-

--

-6

000

--

Mth

unzi

ni

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e up

grad

edD

esig

nN

ot s

tart

ed3

233

--

-2

233

1 00

0-

-

Goe

dem

oed

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Wat

er c

hann

el

upgr

aded

Cons

truc

tion

Not

sta

rted

70 6

018

500

15 5

19-

--

--

Vario

us c

entr

es:

Stan

dby

gene

rato

rs

Stan

dby

gene

rato

rs

inst

alle

dD

esig

nCo

ntin

uing

18

000

2 00

010

479

36 1

04-

50 0

0010

000

-

Vario

us c

entr

es:

Scho

ol fa

cilit

ies

New

sch

ool f

acili

ties

cons

truc

ted

Vario

usCo

ntin

uing

13

5 00

0-

--

1 00

010

000

30 0

00-

Vario

us c

entr

es:

Repl

acem

ent o

f eq

uipm

ent

Kitc

hen

equi

pmen

t, bo

ilers

, inc

iner

ator

s, po

wer

, wat

er

and

sew

erag

e sy

stem

s re

plac

ed

in c

ompl

ianc

e w

ith

Occ

upat

iona

l Hea

lth

and

Safe

ty A

ct (1

993)

Cons

truc

tion

Cont

inui

ng

343

000

67 9

5859

003

26 3

56-

80 0

0060

000

50 0

00


Curr

ent

Serv

ice

deliv

ery

stag

ePr

ojec

t sta

gePr

ojec

ted

com

plet

ion

date

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Oth

er s

mal

l gr

oupe

d pr

ojec

tsIn

tegr

ated

sec

urity

sy

stem

s in

stal

led;

ki

tche

n eq

uipm

ent

and

boile

rs re

plac

ed;

stan

dby

gene

rato

rs

inst

alle

d; w

ater

and

se

wer

age

plan

ts

upgr

aded

, etc

.

Vario

usCo

ntin

uing

1

342

188

190

575

83 7

8757

749

127

209

13 5

188

214

-

Piet

erm

aritz

burg

, Q

alak

abus

ha

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Inte

grat

ed s

ecur

ity

syst

em p

rovi

ded

Cons

truc

tion

71

000

40 0

0029

817

855

--

--

Koks

tad

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Wat

er a

nd s

ewer

age

pipe

s re

plac

ed a

nd

othe

r civ

il w

orks

Iden

tifica

tion

Not

sta

rted

--

10 4

7620

714

989

10 0

005

000

8 59

1

Bran

dvle

i co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

Stru

ctur

es re

paire

d an

d m

aint

aine

dId

entifi

catio

nN

ot s

tart

ed-

645

10 0

0040

000

10 0

0025

000

Port

Eliz

abet

h,

Nor

th E

nd

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Stru

ctur

es re

paire

d an

d m

aint

aine

d -

Maj

or re

pair

and

reno

vatio

n to

ent

ire

corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e an

d offi

ces

Cons

truc

tion

Unk

now

n-

-15

810

35 5

0730

700

--

-

Rust

enbu

rg

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re

Stru

ctur

es re

paire

d an

d m

aint

aine

d -

maj

or re

pair

and

reno

vatio

n to

ent

ire

corr

ectio

nal c

entr

e,

office

s an

d st

aff

hous

ing

Vario

usN

ot s

tart

ed-

--

8 90

432

822

29 6

4441

092

40 0

00

Dur

ban

Wes

tvill

e co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

Stru

ctur

es re

paire

d an

d m

aint

aine

d -

tota

l rep

airs

to th

e en

tire

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re c

ompl

ex

incl

udin

g ci

vil w

orks

an

d bu

ildin

gs

Iden

tifica

tion

Not

sta

rted

--

--

--

20 0

0040

000


Curr

ent

Serv

ice

deliv

ery

stag

ePr

ojec

t sta

gePr

ojec

ted

com

plet

ion

date

Tota

l pr

ojec

t co

stA

udit

ed o

utco

me

Mai

n ap

prop

riat

ion

Med

ium

-ter

m e

xpen

ditu

re e

stim

ate

RTh

ousa

nd

2010

/201

120

11/2

012

2012

/201

320

13/2

014

2014

/201

520

15/2

016

2016

/201

7

Joha

nnes

burg

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

Stru

ctur

es re

paire

d an

d m

aint

aine

d -

tota

l rep

airs

to th

e en

tire

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re c

ompl

ex

incl

udin

g ci

vil w

orks

an

d bu

ildin

gs

Iden

tifica

tion

Not

sta

rted

--

3 29

8-

--

20 0

0040

000

St A

lban

s co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

Stru

ctur

es re

paire

d an

d m

aint

aine

d -

tota

l rep

airs

to th

e en

tire

corr

ectio

nal

cent

re c

ompl

ex

incl

udin

g ci

vil w

orks

an

d bu

ildin

gs

Iden

tifica

tion

Not

sta

rted

--

1 04

2-

--

15 0

0030

000

Vario

us c

entr

es:

Stru

ctur

es

repa

ired

and

mai

ntai

ned

Repa

irs to

co

rrec

tiona

l ce

ntre

faci

litie

s an

d pl

anni

ng fo

r co

rrec

tiona

l cen

tre

faci

litie

s su

ch

as R

uste

nbur

g,

Bran

dvle

i Max

imum

, Br

its e

tc.

Des

ign

Cont

inui

ng

-18

6 00

03

421

21 8

9111

0 48

912

7 55

910

5 64

244

630

Tota

l

8 35

2 53

895

0 93

959

2 42

374

4 47

180

3 06

781

2 96

081

9 94

886

3 40

6

* Li

chte

nbur

g up

grad

ing,

whi

ch w

as p

revi

ously

gro

uped

with

Tho

hoya

ndou

You

th a

nd L

yden

burg

, occ

upie

s its

ow

n ro

w. T

he 2

34 a

dditi

onal

bed

spa

ces

attr

ibut

ed to

Lic

hten

burg

wer

e

subt

ract

ed fr

om th

e pr

ojec

t gro

up a

nd re

port

ed se

para

tely

und

er L

icht

enbu

rg. *

Bra

ndvl

ei M

axim

um, w

hich

was

pre

viou

sly g

roup

ed w

ith Z

onde

rwat

er a

nd V

oorb

erg

occu

pies

its o

wn

row

.

Its b

udge

t of R

140

mill

ion

was

subt

ract

ed fr

om th

e gr

oup

proj

ect t

otal

cos

t and

repo

rted

sepa

rate

ly u

nder

Bra

ndvl

ei M

axim

um.


aCRonyms

A&R Admission and release

ACSA African Correctional Services Association

AET Adult education and training

AGSA Auditor-General South Africa

APP Annual performance plan

ART Antiretroviral treatment/therapy

ATP Awaiting trial person

CJS Criminal Justice System

CMC Case Management Committee

DBE Department of Basic Education

DCS Department of Correctional Services

DHET Department of Higher Education and Training

DPW Department of Public Works

EC Eastern Cape

EHW Enviromental Health Watch

EM Electronic Monitoring

EMS Electronic Monitoring System

FET Further Education and Training

FSNC Free State Northern Cape

GITO Government Information Technology Office

GP Gauteng Province

HCT Hiv Counselling and Testing

HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus

ICT Information and Communications Technology

IEHW Integrated Employee Health and Wellness

IIMS Integrated Inmate Management System

IJS Integrated Justice System


IT Information Technology

JCPS Justice Crime Prevention and Security

KZN KwaZulu-Natal

LAN Local Area Network

LMN Limpopo Mpumalanga North West

MDG Millennium Development Goal

MP Member of Parliament

MoU Memorandum of understanding

MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework

MTSF Medium-term Strategic Framework

NDP National Development Plan

RD Remand Detainee

RJ Restorative Justice

SANDF South African National Defence Force

SITA State Information Technology Agency

SLA Service Level Agreement

STI Sexually Transmitted Illness

VOD Victim Offender Dialogue

VOIP Voice Over Internet Protocol

VOM Victim-Offender Mediation

VPN Virtual Private Network

WC Western Cape

WSP Workplace Skills Plan


teChniCal indiCatoR desCRiptoRs

Indicator title 1 Percentage of cases brought against the department defended

Short definition The department is inundated with court challenges, mostly from offenders who want to be transferred from one correctional centre to the other and from offenders serving life sentences who want to be considered for and placed on parole. It is, therefore, imperative that DCS is represented in court to defend its decisions on review

Purpose/importance To avoid a situation where the courts step into the shoes of the Minister and other functionaries who are legally charged with the responsibility of taking certain administrative decisions

Source/collection of data Litigation databases

Method of calculation Checking against databases of litigation matters whether all litigation matters instituted against the department have been defended

Data limitations Cases that are brought in court without the department having received the necessary court documents

Type of indicator Output: Effective management of litigation cases

Calculation type Cumulative

Reporting cycle Quarterly

New indicator Existing

Desired performance 100% of all cases brought against the department defended

Indicator responsibility Deputy Commissioner: Legal Services

Indicator title 2 Single capture of inmate and offender information

Short definition An offender/inmate record is captured once and will seamlessly integrate with all other relevant systems

Purpose/importance To ensure that there is a single version of the truth and to eliminate duplication and man-ual user input errors

Source/collection of data Project reports

Method of calculation Qualitative reviews on progress

Data limitations Progress based on estimates

Type of indicator Output: Single view of inmate and offender information

Calculation type Non-cumulative

Reporting cycle Annually

New indicator New indicator

Desired performance Actual performance that is higher than targeted performance is desirable

Indicator responsibility Deputy Commissioner: Applications Management


Indicator title 3 Automated and integrated core operations support system

Short definition Automation and integration of operational systems

Purpose/importance Automate and integrate the business processes supporting the DCS core operations


Method of calculation Quantitative reviews on progress


Type of indicator Output: Automated and Integrated core support systems

Calculation type Cumulative as per system




Indicator responsibility Deputy Commissioner: Applications Management

Indicator title 4 Consolidated network components and infrastructure

Short definition Implementation of a centralised and virtualised server architecture

Purpose/importance Ensure optimum performance of the infrastructure and reduce complexity




Type of indicator Output: Centralised and virtualised infrastructure





Indicator Responsibility Deputy Commissioner: IT Infrastructure Management

Indicator title 5 Consolidated and integrated physical security system

Short definition Consolidate security network into the LAN

Purpose/importance Reduction of duplication, less complexity and ease of management




Type of indicator Output: Consolidated network infrastructure



New indicator New


Indicator responsibility Deputy Commissioner: IT Infrastructure Management


Indicator title 6 Percentage of allocated budget spent

Short definition Monitoring of expenditure against allocated budget

Purpose/importance It measures the extent to which the current allocated budget is spent

Source/collection of data BAS information as from 2004 Non-electronic - annual reportExisting - beginning of each financial year the transversal system is updated with the current allocated budget for the financial year

Method of calculation Amount spent on budget divided by current allocated budget x 100, cumulative

Data limitations Risk of erroneous, fraudulent and late capturing of data at different levels

Type of indicator Outcome: There is good governance, accurate monitoring, evaluation reporting and accountabilityOutput: Spending of allocated budgetActivities: Monitoring of spending, in-year monitoring, monthly financial meetings, bud-get committee meetings

Calculation type Amount spent on budget divided by current allocated budget x 100

Reporting cycle Monthly (month close between 6th and 8th of every month), quarterly (month close be-tween 6th and 8th of every month) and annually (annual close 30 April of each financial year).


Desired performance Desirable performance should be underspending between 0,25% and 0%

Indicator responsibility Director: Management Accounting

Indicator title 7 Number of audit qualifications

Short definition Measure compliance of department to legislation and prescripts.

Purpose/importance To measure compliance to legislation and prescripts

Source/collection of data Audit report in the annual report.

Method of calculation Number of audit qualifications and emphases of matter for the reporting year minus the number of audit qualifications and matters of emphasis for the previous reporting year. (Reduction of audit qualification in relation to the previous financial year). Remain with calculation target is just a number and that is zero.

Data limitations Incorrect data submitted to AGSA may contribute to number of qualifications.

Type of indicator Outcome: There is good governance, accurate, monitoring, evaluation reporting and accountabilityOutput: Zero audit qualification (unqualified audit opinion)Activities: Measure compliance to legislation and prescripts

Calculation type Number of audit qualifications and emphases of matter for the previous reporting year



Desired performance Zero audit qualification is desirable (unqualified audit opinion)

Indicator responsibility Chief Director: Internal Control and Compliance


Indicator title 8 Percentage of funded posts filled

Short definition The indicator aims to maintain a vacancy rate of less than 5% by einsuring that 98% of funded posts are filled against approved funded establishment

Purpose/importance The purpose of the indicator is to ensure that 98% of funded posts are filled.

Source/collection of data Persal system

Method of calculation Total number of vacant posts divided by the approved funded establishment x 100

Data limitation Persal data integrity

Type of Indicator This indicator measures outputs and it assist in determining the immediate outcomes are being achieved or not




Desired performance Maintenance of less than 5% vacancy rate

Indicator responsibility Director Human Resource Administration and Utilisation

Indicator title 9 Number of officials trained in line with the WSP

Short definition This indicator determines the number of officials trained per WSP training priorities

Purpose/importance It determines the extent to which the WSP is being implemented. The WSP contains all the development needs of the officials in the organisation.

Source/collection of data Correctional centres - training attendance registers

Method of calculation Count the number of officials trained per WSP priority

Data limitation It will not assist in determining whether officials attended more than one WSP programme

Type of Indicator Performance indicator measures output and contributes to the strategic objectives of building organisational capacity for enhanced service delivery and professionalisation for effective human resource management and development




Desired performance Number of officials trained per WSP priority = WSP priority targets

Indicator responsibility Director :Training Standards


Indicator title 10 Number of management areas where the IEHW programme rolled out

Short definition Number of management areas where IEHW programme has been rolled out

Purpose/importance It measures the number of management areas where the IEHW programme has been rolled out and thereby assisted in determining the extent to which the IEHW framework is implemented

Source/collection of data Management areasArea management IEHW utilisation report: Groenpunt, Johannesburg, Pollsmor, Kokstad, Baviaansport

Method of calculation Count the number of management areas where IEHW programmes have been implemented

Data limitation Inconsistency of implementation of the IEHW framework, ie different management areas implementing different programmes

Type of Indicator Strategic objective: Building organisational capacity for enhanced service deliveryStrategic outcome goal: Effective justice through effective management of remand processesIndicator outcome: Productive and healthy workforce




Desired performance All management areas implementing IEHW programmes

Indicator responsibility Director: Integrated Employee Health and Wellness

Indicator title 11 Percentage of inmates allegedly assaulted in correctional and remand detention facilities per year

Short definition The indicator measures the actual recorded number of inmate injuries as a result of alleged assaults by fellow inmates or officials, indicated as a percentage of the inmate population.

Purpose/importance This indicator is an important tool in measuring, among others, perceptions of safety and security of inmates in correctional facilities

Source/collection of data G336 injury register as per healthcare policy and procedureThe consolidated unlock totals of inmate population (daily unlock template)

Method of calculation Actual recorded number of inmates injured and the causes of injuries being recorded as alleged assault divided by the inmate population multiplied by 100 = % of alleged assaults

Data limitations Inconsistent capturing of information at centre level on the source document.

Type of indicator Outcome: Inmates are held in safe, secure and humane custodyOutput: Improved secure and safe custody of all inmates




Desired performance Desired performance is 3% or less

Indicator responsibility Director: Security Management


Indicator title 12 Percentage of unnatural deaths in correctional and remand detention facilities per year

Short definition This indicator measures the actual recorded number of inmates who died from unnatural causes. It is indicated as a percentage of the inmate population.

Purpose/importance Inmates are held in safe secure and humane custody

Source/collection of data Death register as per healthcare policy and procedureThe consolidated unlock totals of inmate population (daily unlock template)

Method of calculation Actual recorded number of inmates who died from unnatural causes divided by inmate population x 100 = % of unnatural deaths.

Data limitations Final cause of death needs to be investigated and is therefore not always available at the end of the reporting period. The result of this is that the actual statistics reported for a specific period can change later.

Type of indicator Outcome: Inmates are held in safe, secure and humane custodyOutput: Improved secure and safe custody of all inmates




Desired performance Desired performance is less than 0,03% - 0% targeted over time.


Indicator title 13 Percentage of inmates who escape from correctional and remand detention facilities per year

Short definition The indicator measures the actual recorded number of inmates who escaped from the custody of DCS indicated as a percentage of the inmate population.

Purpose/importance Inmates are held in safe, secure and humane custody. Indicator is linked to JCPS Outcome 3 (All people in South Africa are and feel safe.).

Source/collection of data Escape registerThe consolidated unlock totals of inmate population (daily unlock template)

Method of calculation The actual recorded number of inmates who escaped from the custody of DCS divided by the inmate population, x 100 = % escapes

Data limitations Possible late reporting of escapes can influence the statistics for a specific reporting period

Type of indicator Outcome: Inmates are held in safe, secure and humane custody. Inmates and staff and service providers have safe and healthy conditions. Output: Improved secure and safe custody of all inmates




Desired performance Desirable performance is zero %



Indicator title 14 Number of new bedspaces created by upgrading facilities per year

Short definition The indicator measures the actual number of new bedspaces created upon completion of correctional facility upgrading projects

Purpose/importance To assist in monitoring overcrowding in correctional facilities

Source/collection of data G309 forms

Method of calculation The difference between the number of bedspaces in upgraded correctional facilities and the original number of bedspaces before upgrading

Data limitations Possible late reporting

Type of indicator Output: Facilities conducive for rehabilitation and humane incarceration of inmates

Calculation type Type (number of bedspaces in completed upgraded facility) – (number of bedspaces before upgrading) = number of new bedspaces created by upgrading of facilities



Desired performance Achieve 100% completion of upgrading construction projects in completion year

Indicator responsibility Directorate

Director: Facilities Planning and Development

Indicator title 15 Operational policies aligned with the White Paper on Remand Detention

Short definition Operational policies aligned with the White Paper on Remand Detention

Purpose/importance The indicator will show that the department has a broad policy that has been aligned with the White Paper on Remand Detention and several procedure manuals that outline the processes to be followed in the following areas: • referral of RDs to court based on the length of detention • referral of terminally ill or severely incapacitated RDs to court • privilege system for RDs • disciplinary procedure manual for the RDs and • procedure manual for uniform of RDs

Source/collection of data Progress reports on the development of operational policies

Method of calculation Review alignment of operational policies with White Paper on Remand Detention.

Data limitations None

Type of indicator Process indicator

Calculation type Not applicable



Desired performance Aligned operational policies with White Paper on Remand Detention.

Indicator responsibility Shared Indicator as follows: • Director: Remand Policy Analysis

– Final draft policy on Remand Detention Management – Approved policy procedure manual on referral of RDs to court based on the length

of detention – Final draft policy procedure manual on referral of terminally ill or severely

incapacitated RDs to court • Director: Remand Detention Systems and Safety

– Final draft priviledge system for RDs – Final draft disciplinary procedure manual for the RDs

• Director: Remand Administration and Case Flow Management – Final draft policy procedure manual for uniform of RDs


Indicator title 16 Percentage of overcrowding in correctional centres and remand detention facilities per year in excess of official capacity

Short definition This indicator measures the population levels of remand detention facilities and correctional centres.

Purpose/importance Calculation of the number of RDs and sentenced offenders against the approved capacity

Source/collection of data G251: Movement register (variation), G252; Lock-up, G253; Certification, G309 Approved accommodation. These are the source documents that are used to capture the information on the A&R system

Method of calculation Total number of inmates divided by the approved and available accommodation x 100 -100.

Data limitations Delays in capturing when data lines are down. Changes not updated in the system, eg when a facility has been temporarily closed. Data integrity.

Type of indicator Outcome: Offending behaviour is targeted Output: Management of overcrowding Activity: Effective implementation of eight-pronged strategy to down manage overcrowding.

Calculation type Non-cumulative.



Desired performance Actual performance should be lower that the set target

Indicator responsibility Director: Correction Administration

Indicator title 17 Percentage of offenders who participate in Educational programmes measured against the enrolment register per academic year.

Short definition The indicator measures the actual number of offenders (as a percentage) who participate in literacy, AET and FET mainstream programmes against the enrolment register per programme per academic year.

Purpose/importance This indicator is that it seeks to ensure that offendersare literate, educated, skilled and have competencies

Source/collection of data Enrolment register at beginning of academic year Class attendance register as learners attend per timetable

Method of calculation The actual attendance divided by the enrolment x 100

Data limitations Denominator changes frequently because of offenders being released on a continuous basis.Capturing is done manually on a spreadsheet and there is, therefore, a serious risk for human error.Unavailability of ICT Infrastructure to capture information in certaincentres

Type of indicator Outcome: Offenders are literate, educated, skilled and have competenciesOutput: Number of offenders who participated in the programmes increased.


Reporting cycle Enrolment – annually

New indicator Significantly changed from the previous year

Desired performance Actual performance should be higher than the set target

Indicator responsibility Director: Formal Education


Indicator title18 Percentage of offenders who participate in skills development

programmes measured against the list of offenders registered for participation (enrolment register)

Short definition The indicator measures the actual number of offenders (as a percentage) who participate in skills training and FET college programmes against the list of offenders registered for participation (enrolment register)

Purpose/importance This indicator seeks to ensure that offendersare educated, skilled and have competencies

Source/collection of data List of offenders registered for participation (enrolment register) At beginning of academic year (FET college programmes) At the beginning of the financial year (skills training programmes) Attendance register as learners attend per timetable

Method of calculation The actual attendance divided by the enrolment x 100

Data limitations Denominator changes frequently because of offenders being released continuously.Capturing is done manually on a spreadsheet and there is, therefore, a serious risk of human error.Unavailability of ICT infrastructure to capture information in certaincentres

Type of indicator Outcome: Offenders are skilled and have competenciesOutput: Number of offenders who participated in skills development programmes in-creased

Calculation type Skills development – non-cumulativeFET college – non-cumulative

Reporting cycle Skills training programmes - reported annuallyFET college programmes - reported per academic yearParticipation – daily/weekly/monthly/quarterly

New indicator Significantly changed from the previous year


Indicator responsibility Directorate : Skills Development


Indicator title 19 Percentage of inmates who are involved in psychological services

Short definition Measuring whether offenders are receiving psychological services and programmes according to their needs

Purpose/importance The indicator measures the number of inmates who are participating in individual psychological services against the inmate population

Source/collection of data Monthly statistics formPsychological services annexure G: attendance register for individual interventionsPsychological services annexure H: attendance register for group programmes (management areas)Consolidated unlock totals of all sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees

Method of calculation Number of inmates who participated in individual psychological services and programmes divided by total inmates population (sentenced and unsentenced) x 100

Data limitations Systematic capturing tools are in place, but human error remains a risk.Manual data collection at different levels of reporting allows for human error, which might cause under/over-reporting

Type of indicator The indicator describes outcomes and activitiesOutcome: Improved psychological functioning of inmates (sentenced and unsentenced) involved in needs-based therapeutic interviews and programmesActivities: Rendering of therapeutic interviews and programmes to sentenced and unsentenced inmates Rendering of programmes to inmates (sentenced and unsentenced) Monitoring provision of services and therapeutic programmes





Indicator responsibility Director: Psychological Services


Indicator title 20 Percentage of offenders who are involved in social work service

Short definition Measuring the actual number of sentenced, incarcerated offenders, probationers and parolees who participated in social work services according to their needs

Purpose/importance To improve the social functioning of the incarcerated offenders, probationers and parolees

Source/collection of data G388 social work statistics form (regions and head office)Social work diary page G388 (A) (management areas)Social work reports (assessment, process and progress) for relevant interventions (management areas level)The consolidated unlock totals of sentenced offenders including probationers and parolees

Method of calculation Number of sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees who were involved in therapeutic interviews and programmes divided by total number of sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees x 100

Data limitations Systematic capturing tools are in place, but human error remains a riskManual data collection at different levels of reporting allows for human error, which might cause under/over-reporting

Type of indicator Outcome: Improved social functioning of sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees.Output: Increased number of sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees involved in therapeutic interviews Increased number of sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees involved in therapeutic programmes. Activities: Rendering of therapeutic interviews to sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees.Rendering of programmes to sentenced offenders, probationers and parolees.Monitoring the provision of services and therapeutic programmes




Desired performance High performance is desirable

Indicator responsibility Director: Social Work Services


Indicator title 21 Percentage of inmates who benefit from spiritual services

Short definition Measuring whether offenders are receiving spiritual services and programmes according to their needs

Purpose/importance The indicator measures the number of inmates who are participating in individual spiritual care sessions against the inmate population (sentenced and unsentenced)

Source/collection of data G249 (monthly return: Remuneration to and activities of religious workers) and Annexure A to G249 (spiritual care specific programme report) and Annexure B to G249 (name list of inmates/offenders participating in spiritual care services and programmes). The data source for the Inmate population is the reporting document: ‘Daily reporting of inmate population’ provided by Correctional Administration. An information system (monthly spiritual care data collection tool) is in place and information is recorded, but it is either not recorded systematically or is not of high quality

Method of calculation Number of inmates who participated in individual spiritual care sessions divided by unlock total inmates population (sentenced and unsentenced) x 100

Data limitations Systematic capturing tools are in place, but human error remains a risk. Manual data collection at different levels of reporting allows for human error, which might cause under/over-reporting

Type of indicator Outcome: Offenders experience spiritual wellbeing and are able to function sociallyOutput: Increased offender involvement in spiritual care programme Activities: Assess and identify offenders according to their spiritual needs. Provide spiritual care-based programmes. Monitor the provision of spiritual care programmes

Calculation type Cumulative: Every month’s total of inmates participating in individual spiritual care sessions adds up to the annual total for the year. The inmate population for quarterly and annual reports is calculated per average for the quarter and year respectively



Desired performance Higher performance is desirable

Indicator responsibility Director: Spiritual Care

Indicator title 22 Percentage of therapeutic diets prescribed for inmates

Short definition The indicator measures the number of therapeutic diets prescribed to inmates

Purpose/importance Monitors the number of therapeutic diets prescribed for inmates.

Source/collection of data Therapeutic diet register

Method of calculation Number of therapeutic diets (numerator) divided by the number of inmate population (denominator) multiplied by 100.

Data limitations Prone to human error as data is collected and captured manually. Non-availability of func-tioning health information systems and lack of computers to capture information.

Type of indicator The indicator is measuring the proportion of therapeutic diets prescribed for inmates against all diets.

Calculation type Cumulative.


New indicator New Indicator

Desired performance Less than 10%

Indicator responsibility Director: Health Care Service


Indicator title 23 Percentage of inmates tested for HIV

Short definition The indicator measures the number of inmates tested for HIV

Purpose/importance To measure the number of inmates tested for HIV

Source/collection of data HIV counselling and testing (HCT) register

Method of calculation Number of inmates tested for HIV divided by the actual inmate population multiplied by 100.

Data limitations Prone to human error as data is collected and captured manually. Non-availability of func-tioning health information systems and lack of computers to capture information.

Type of indicator Indicator measures: Outcome : Inmates are healthy Output : Inmates have voluntarily tested for HIV




Desired performance Above 70%

Indicator responsibility Director: HIV and AIDS

Indicator title 24 Percentage of inmates on Antiretroviral therapy (ART)

Short definition The indicator measures the percentage of all HIV positive inmates who are on ART.

Purpose/importance To measure the cumulative number of inmates on ART and to improve the quality of life of people living with HIV and AIDS.

Source/collection of data ART register

Method of calculation Cumulative number of inmates on ART divided by cumulative number of inmates on ART plus the number of inmates qualifying for ART (not yet on ART) multiplied by 100.

Data limitations Prone to human error as data is collected and captured manually. Non-availability of functioning health information systems and lack of computers to capture information.

Type of indicator Indicator is measuring: Outcome: Inmates are healthy Output: Provision of ART to HIV-positive inmates.





Indicator responsibility Director: HIV and AIDS


Indicator title 25 TB (new pulmonary) cure rate

Short definition The indicator measures the number of inmates with new pulmonary TB smear positive and culture positive cured on completion of treatment.

Purpose/importance Monitors cured new pulmonary TB inmates on completion of treatment.

Source/collection of data TB register

Method of calculation Number of TB (new pulmonary) inmates cured (numerator) divided by the Number of TB (new pulmonary) inmates initiated on treatment (denominator multiplied by 100. (NB within the treatment period).

Data limitations Prone to human error as data as collected and captured manually. Non-availability of functioning health information systems and lack of computers to capture information.

Type of indicator Indicator measures treatment outcome/success.

Calculation type Cumulative per quarter


New indicator Existing, but have significantly changed


Indicator responsibility Director: Healthcare Service

Indicator title 26 Number of management areas with contracted healthcare waste services

Short definition The indicator measures number of management areas that have contracted healthcare waste services.

Purpose/importance The indicator measures the number of management areas that have contracted service providers for the management of healthcare waste services to prevent spread of communicable disease and illegal dumping, which may lead to environmental pollution.

Source/collection of data Signed contracts with service providers. Information will be collected manually by nurses and environmental hygiene supervisors.

Method of calculation Counting the number of management areas that have contracted healthcare waste services.

Data limitations Prone to human error as data is collected and captured manually. Non-availability of functioning health information systems and lack of computers to capture information.

Type of indicator Indicator measures the number of management areas with contracted healthcare waste services. Output: Number of management areas that have contracted healthcare waste services. Outcome: Effective management of healthcare waste.

Calculation type Non-cumulative.




Indicator responsibility Director: Healthcare Service


Indicator title 27 Percentage of cases submitted by CMCs and considered by Parole Boards

Short definition This indicator measures the percentage of cases (profiles) that were submitted by CMC for consideration that have been considered for possible placement/release by Parole Boards. All offenders with sentences of longer thantwo years. NB: G306 cases ( first consideration) are not included in cases eligible/submitted or cases considered.

Purpose/importance This indicator measures the number of cases (profiles) considered by the Parole Board after being submitted by the CMC.

Source/collection of data Profile register and agenda for Parole Board session.

Method of calculation Number of cases considered (parole + correctional supervision + medical parole + day parole + sentence expiry + further profile) by the Parole Board divided by number of cases (profiles) submitted by the CMC to the Parole Board x 100.NB: G306 cases (first consideration) are not included in cases considered.

Data limitations Data lines down causes delays in capturing. Changes not updated on the system due to unavailability of basic IT infrastructure. Data integrity.

Type of indicator Output: Increased percentage of cases considered by Parole Board. Activities: Consider eligible offenders for placement/release.




Desired performance The desired performance must be higher than 95%

Indicator responsibility Directorate: Pre-Release Resettlement


Indicator title 28 Percentage of parolees without violations

Short definition Parolees under the system of community corrections without violations

Purpose/importance The indicator encourages parolees to comply with their parole conditions and reduce violations

Source/collection of data • Monitoring list

The following steps must be followed to generate these reports: • Access the community corrections system • Select option ‘F’ – reports • Select option ‘M’ – control reports • Select option ‘B’ – name list per status • Select type of probationer – options are: correctional/awaiting trial/parole/all (for

the calculation of the indicator on parolees without violations, select ‘parole’ and for the calculation of the indicator on probationers without violations, select ‘correctional’)

• ‘Click’ on the status code block and then press ‘F5’ • Select the status type for each report individually. Options are:

19 (changed over to prison conditions violated) – Section 287 and 276(1)(i) cases referred back to the correctional centre upon violation of condition(s)29 (change over to prison crime conditions) – Section 287 and 276(1)(i) cases who committed crime whilst under the system of community corrections38 (to prison alt sentence con violated)– Section 276 (1)(h) cases where the court sen-tences offender to alternative sentence of imprisonment for violation(s) of conditions39 (to prison alt sentence crime committed)– Section 276(1)(h) cases where the court sentences offender to alternative sentence of imprisonment for committing another crime 41 (alternative sentence cond violated) – Section 276(1)(h) cases where the court sen-tences offender to alternative sentence (non-imprisonment, eg fine, suspended sentence) for violation of condition(s)42 (alternative sentence cond crime committed)– 276(1)(h) cases where the court sentences offender to alternative sentence (non-imprisonment, eg fine, suspended sentence) for committing another crime49 (pri-par permanently suspended) – parole suspended and referred back to the correc-tional centre • Fill in the date: Date from: ___/___/___ to ___/___/___ • Press ‘OK’ • Print report

Method of calculation Number of parolees without violations divided by the total number of parolees x 100 = % answer

Data limitations • Systems offline • Delay in capturing and printing of reports • Changes not updated in the system, eg when an office has been closed or moved to a

new location • Data integrity, eg system sometimes count individuals twice on violations • No access to regional offices to conduct monitoring on the A&R, LAN system and

community corrections system

Type of indicator Outcome: Persons under community corrections are accepted back into communitiesOutput: Increase compliance to parole conditionsActivities: Physical monitoring of parolees


Indicator title 28 Percentage of parolees without violations

Calculation type To calculate this you need to determine the following:• Daily average caseload of parolees at the end of the month• Number of parolees who violated their conditionsEXAMPLE: • The average monthly parolee case load for the month is 6 553 • A total of 2 571 parolees have violated their conditions• Subtract the total of violations (2 571) from the average monthly caseload (6 553) to give the number of parolees without violations 6 553 – 2 571 = 3 982• To calculate the percentage: Multiply the number of parolees without violations by 100 and then divide it through the average monthly case load 3 982 x 100 ÷ 6 553 = 61%


New indicator Existing indicator


Indicator responsibility Director: Supervision (Probationers and Parolees)

Indicator title 29 Percentage of probationers without violations

Short definition Probationers under the system of community corrections without violations

Purpose/importance The indicator encourages probationers to comply with their correctional supervision conditions and reduce violations

Source/collection of data • Monitoring list • Access the community corrections system • Select option ‘F’ – reports • Select option ‘M’ – control reports • Select option ‘B’ – name list per status • Select type of probationer – options are: correctional/awaiting trial/parole/all (for

the calculation of the indicator on parolees without violations, select ‘parole’ and for the calculation of the indicator on probationers without violations, select ‘correctional’)

• ‘Click’ on the status code block and then press ‘F5’ • Select the status type for each report individually. Options are:

19 (changed over to prison conditions violated) – Section 287 and 276(1)(i) cases referred back to the correctional centre upon violation of condition(s)29 (change over to prison crime conditions) – Section 287 and 276(1)(i) cases who committed crime whilst under the system of community corrections38 (to prison alt sentence con violated)– Section 276 (1)(h) cases where the court sentences offender to alternative sentence of imprisonment for violation(s) of conditions39 (to prison alt sentence crime committed)– Section 276(1)(h) cases where the court sentences offender to alternative sentence of imprisonment for committing another crime 41 (alternative sentence cond violated) – Section 276(1)(h) cases where the court sentences offender to alternative sentence (non-imprisonment, eg fine, suspended sentence) for violation of condition(s)42 (alternative sentence cond crime committed)– 276(1)(h) cases where the court sentences offender to alternative sentence (non-imprisonment, eg fine, suspended sentence) for committing another crime49 (pri-par permanently suspended) – parole suspended and referred back to the correctional centre • Fill in the date: Date from: ___/___/___ to ___/___/___ • Press ‘OK’ • Print report

Method of calculation Number of probationers without violations divided by the total number of probationers x 100 = % answer


Indicator title 29 Percentage of probationers without violations

Data limitations • Data line down • Delay in capturing and printing of reports • Changes not updated in the system, eg when an office has been closed or moved to a

new location • Data integrity, eg system sometimes count individuals twice on violations • No access to regional offices to conduct monitoring on the A&R, LAN system and

community corrections system

Type of indicator Outcome: Persons under community corrections (including those on correctional supervision) are accepted back into communitiesOutput: Increase compliance to correctional supervision conditionsActivities: Physical monitoring of probationers

Calculation type To calculate this you need to determine the following: • Daily average caseload of probationers at the end of the month • Number of probationers who violated their conditions

EXAMPLE: • The average monthly probationer case load for the month is 6 553 • A total of 2 571 probationers have violated their conditions • Subtract the total of violations (2 571) from the average monthly caseload (6 553) to

give the number of probationers without violations 6 553 – 2 571 = 3 982 • To calculate the percentage:

– Multiply the number of probationers without violations by 100 and then divide it through the average monthly case load

– 3 982 x 100 ÷ 6 553 = 61%


Calculation Type Non-cumulative

New indicator Existing indicator



Indicator title 30 Number of persons (parolees, probationers and ATPs) placed under EMS

Short definition Persons under EMS within community corrections

Purpose/importance The indicator effectively monitors compliance with community corrections conditions; To promote public safety and securityTo alleviate overcrowding in correctional centresTo reduce incarceration costsTo prevent re-offending

Source/collection of data EM register

Method of calculation • The total number of persons (parolees, probationers and ATPs) under EM versus the total number of persons under the system of community corrections

Data limitations • Unavailability of computers • System offline • Delay in capturing and printing of reports • Changes not updated on the system, eg when an office has been closed or moved to

a new location • Interface between DCS (A&R, LAN system and community corrections system) and

service provider’s computer system (EM)

Type of indicator Outcome: Effective supervision of persons under the system of community correctionsOutput: Increased compliance to community corrections conditionsActivities: EM of persons under the system of community corrections





Indicator responsibility Director: Supervision (Probationers and Parolees)

Indicator title 31 Number of parolees reintegrated through halfway house partnerships

Short definition Number of parolees reintegrated through halfway house partnerships

Purpose/importance The indicator reintegrates offenders through halfway house partnerships

Source/collection of data Halfway house register

Method of calculation The number of offenders who have been reintegrated through halfway houses against the total number of parolees under the system of community corrections

Data limitations Lack of referrals from the centresInaccuracy of the data in the halfway house register due to human error

Type of indicator Outcome: Persons under community corrections are accepted back into the communityOutput: Reconstruction and restoration of relationshipsActivity: Identify and place offenders who are not having monitorable addresses upon release on parole



New indicator New


Indicator responsibility Director: Community Liaison


Indicator title32 Number of victims and offenders who participated in restorative justice

programmes (victim offender mediation -VOM; victim offender dialogue - VOD)

Short definition Participation of victims and offenders in RJ/VOD programmes

Purpose/importance Afford an opportunity for victims and offenders to mediate and for victims to make representation to the Parole Board

Source/collection of data • Name list of offenders participated in RJ/VOD programmes • Register of victims who participated

Method of calculation Number of victims participated in RJ/VOD programmes against the total number of sentenced offenders

Data limitations • Data lines down causes delays in capturing. • Unavailability of basic IT infrastructure • Unwillingness of victims and offenders to participate • Tracing of victims • Lack of information on victims

Type of indicator Outcome: Restoration of relationships Output: Improved participation of victims and offenders in RJ programmes Activities: Involvement of victims and offenders in RJ (VOM/VOD) programmes



New indicator New

Desired performance Restored relationships between victims and offenders


Indicator title 33 Decentralisation of community correction services

Short definition Access of services to persons under the system of community corrections

Purpose/importance This indicator decentralises supervision services to communities where offenders reside through establishing service points (eg tribal authorities, clinics and multipurpose centres in urban, semi-urban, remote and rural areas)

Source/collection of data Service points register

Method of calculation Service points established against the total number of community corrections offices

Data limitations • Systems offline • Delay in capturing and printing of reports • Changes not updated in the system, eg when an office has been closed or moved to a

new location • Delays in signing of SLAs and memorandum of understanding (MoU)

Type of indicator Outcome: Accessibility of community correction servicesOutput: Database on service pointsActivities: Identification of service points




Desired performance Access to services


performance plan 2014/2015 - department of correctional services · 2018. 8. 24. · 2 department...

Documents