performance review
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
RAISING STANDARDSPERFORMANCE
REVIEW
Glenn Hills Middle School
Celebrating Academic Success
Creating A Community of Excellence!
Aug-Sept 2009-2010
![Page 2: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
It’s Still A Critical Situation
Needs Improvement (NI9)
We are much better!
Yes! We are much better!
![Page 3: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Raising Standards Performance Review
Raising Standards For
Academic & Athletic Success
Creating A Community of Excellence!
![Page 4: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Student Performance (Pre-Test)
6th Grade Math Benchmark Achievement Level
34.1232.54
30
35.48 35.22 35.3233.2 32.64
20
32.3233.83
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Cadle* Carpenter* Daniels* Eastman Goodman Hamlett Roberson Robinson* Tilliski Walker* Average
![Page 5: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Student Performance (Pre-Test)
7th Grade Math Benchmark Achievement Level
35.2
3033.63 33.15
28.9831.32 32.81
30.8334.17
30.83 30.14 31.76 32.11
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
![Page 6: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Student Performance (Pre-Test)
8th Grade Math Benchmark Achievement Level
32.1234.42
30.68 30.16 29.6827.5
18.48
28.92
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Carpenter, B.* Mahoney* Moore Nobles Peterson* Rollins Stark Average
![Page 7: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Student Performance (Attendance)
Students ABS.
0
50
100
150
Students
Students 134 61 24 10 6 3 1 1 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
![Page 8: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Student Performance (Discipline)
Discipline 2009-2010
095 136
267359
497572
688 747812
881984 1037
11371201
1306 13511421
14951584
0 10 28 52 63 77 97 135 177 213 219289 302 350 388 409 437 489 508 541
-200
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
11-Aug
18-Aug
25-Aug1-S
ep8-S
ep
15-Se
p
22-Se
p
29-Se
p6-O
ct
13-Oct
20-Oct
27-Oct3-N
ov
10-Nov
17-Nov
24-Nov1-D
ec8-D
ec
15-Dec
22-Dec
29-Dec5-Jan12-Jan19-Jan26-Jan2-F
eb9-F
eb
16-Fe
b
23-Fe
b2-M
ar9-M
ar
16-Mar
23-Mar
30-Mar6-A
pr
13-Apr
20-Apr
27-Apr
4-May
11-May
18-May
25-May
Refe
rral
s
2007-2008 0 95 136 267 359 497 572 688 747 812 881 984 1037 1137 1201 1306 1351 1421 1495 1584
2008-2009 0 10 28 52 63 77 97 135 177 213 219 289 302 350 388 409 437 489 508 541
2009-2010 0 8 17 22
11-Aug
31-Aug
11-Sep
30-Sep
11-Oct
31-Oct
11-Nov
30-Nov
11-Dec
31-Dec
11-Jan
30-Jan
11-Feb
28-Feb
11-Mar
30-Mar
11-Apr
30-Apr
11-May
30-May
![Page 9: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Teacher Performance (Attendance)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Personal 0 0 0.5 0 1 0 2 1 1
Sick 10 5 4 2.5 43 11 0 1.5 11
Professional Development 2 1 1.5 2 1 4 3 1
Clemson GA So.Augusta
STTusk.
Univ. of Florida
UGA GT ISS/SPED Conn
![Page 10: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Student Age Analysis
158
57
9
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Number of Students
Age
6th Grade Ages
Series1 158 57 9
11 12 13
![Page 11: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Student Age Analysis
1
183
40
9
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Number of Students
Age
7th Grade Ages
Series1 1 183 40 9
11 12 13 14
![Page 12: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Student Age Analysis
1
125
66
6
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Number of Students
Ages
8th Grade Ages
Series1 1 125 66 6
12 13 14 15
![Page 13: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Item Analysis
![Page 14: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Item Analysis
![Page 15: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Item Analysis
![Page 16: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Teacher Performance (SSR)
SSR Focus Walk Results
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
Engaged inReadingActivity
Student Logs SummarizingText
MonitoringStudents
Reading Aloud Conferencingw ith Students
Off Task
Strategies
Nu
mb
er
of
Teach
ers
Total Observed
Total observations
![Page 17: Performance Review](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062709/558e7e801a28ab9f0b8b4578/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
5th Grade Writing Assessment
Does Not Meet 100 – 199
Meets 200 – 249
Exceeds 250+