performance test report rendered to: cali bamboo … · performance test report rendered to: cali...

29
PERFORMANCE TEST REPORT Rendered to: CALI BAMBOO PRODUCT: Luxury Vinyl Flooring Report No.: G3432.01-106-31 Report Date: 01/24/17 Test Record Retention Date: 12/22/20

Upload: hoangxuyen

Post on 27-Jan-2019

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

PERFORMANCETESTREPORT

Renderedto:

CALIBAMBOO

PRODUCT:LuxuryVinylFlooring

ReportNo.: G3432.01-106-31 ReportDate: 01/24/17 TestRecordRetentionDate: 12/22/20

PERFORMANCETESTREPORT

Renderedto:

CALIBAMBOO6675MesaRidgeRd#100SanDiego,California92121

ReportNo.: G3432.01-106-31 TestDates: 10/31/16 Through: 12/22/16 ReportDate: 01/24/17 TestRecordRetentionDate: 12/22/20Product:LuxuryVinylFlooringProject Summary: Architectural Testing, Inc., an Intertek company ("Intertek-ATI"), wascontracted by Cali Bamboo to evaluate the properties of their Luxury Vinyl Flooring. Theproductdescription,testprocedures,andtestresultsarereportedherein.

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011TestResultsSummary

Section Results Requirement

ThicknessSwell3.2

4%Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≤12%)LightResistance

LightSample NoEffect3.3

DarkSample NoEffectClass4,HeavyCommercial,(NoMoreThanSlightEffect)

Cleanability/StainResistance

3.4Score10

Class4,HeavyCommercial,(Score˂20-NoMoreThanSlightEffect)

LargeBallImpactResistance3.5

>67.5in.Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(>1400mm(55.1in.))SmallBallImpactResistance

3.6>32in.

Class4,HeavyCommercial,(>500mm(19.7in.))

G3432.01-106-31Page2of21

TestSummaryResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011TestResultsSummary

Section Results Requirement

WearResistance3.7

4,400Class3,Commercial,IP≥4,000cycles

DimensionalTolerances

LengthRange:0.000in.Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≤0.50mm(0.020in.))

WidthRange:0.007in.Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≤0.20mm(0.008in.))

ThicknessRange:0.007in.Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≤0.50mm(0.020in.))

StraightnessRange:0.007in.Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≤0.30mm(0.012in.))

3.8

SquarenessRange:0.000in.Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≤0.20mm(0.008in.))CastorChairResistance3.9

Refertoreport102754999GRR-001 25,000Cycles-NoEffect

Class3,Commercial,(25,000Cycles-NoEffect)

SurfaceBond3.10

2.1N/mm2Class4,HeavyCommercial,

(≥1.5N/mm2)

G3432.01-106-31Page3of21

TestSummaryResults:(Continued)

TestSummaryResults

Standard Results RequirementHeatFlowMeter

ThermalResistance(Hr-ft2-ºF/Btu) (m2-K/W)

ASTMC518Refertoreport

102757999MID-0040.55963 0.0986

NoPass/FailCriteria

CoefficientofFrictionDryCoefficient:0.88ASTMC1028WetCoefficient:0.97

NoPass/FailCriteria

CriticalRadiantFluxASTME648Refertoreport

102757999SAT-001 0.94W/cm2 ClassI,(>0.45W/cm2)

SmokeDensity25KW/m2Radiant-ClearBeam

FactorCorrectionFactor12.0

25KW/m2RadiantwithPilotFlame-ClearBeamFactor

CorrectionFactor

ASTME662Refertoreport

102757999-mid-003

21.3

NoPass/FailCriteria

StaticLoad@250lbsASTMF970

0.0022in.indentation NoPass/FailCriteriaDimensionalStability

MachineDirection0.110in/linealfootdeviationAcrossMachineDirection

ASTMF1700,Sec.6.7

0.010in/linealfootdeviation

NoChange>0.50mm(0.020in.)

ResistancetoChemicalsASTMF1700,Sec.6.8

NoChange NoMoreThanSlightChangeVolatileOrganicChemicalEmissionsCDPHCalifornia

Specification01350Refertoreport

10275799MID-005MetasStated

PrivateOffice,Classroom,andSingleFamilyHomes

G3432.01-106-31Page4of21

TestSummaryResults:(Continued)

TestSummaryResults

Standard ResultSeries/Model TransmissionLoss(STC)

DistressedNaturalFossilized®BambooFlooringwithCaliComplete™

63

CaliBamboo7mmWide+VinylFlooring 62NaturalFossilized®EucalyptusWood

FlooringwithCaliComplete™62

ASTME90Refertoreports:

G3432.02-113-11-R1,G3432.03-113-11-R0,G3432.04-113-11-R1,

andG3432.05-113-11-R1 WintermistCorkFlooringwithCaliComplete™

62

Series/Model SoundTransmission(IIC)DistressedNaturalFossilized®Bamboo

FlooringwithCaliComplete™67

CaliBamboo7mmWide+VinylFlooring 68NaturalFossilized®EucalyptusWood

FlooringwithCaliComplete™65

ASTME492Refertoreports:

G3432.02-113-11-R1,G3432.03-113-11-R0,G3432.04-113-11-R1,

andG3432.05-113-11-R1 WintermistCorkFlooringwithCaliComplete™

68

G3432.01-106-31Page5of21

TestMethods:Thetestspecimenswereevaluatedinaccordancewiththefollowingmethods.

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,LaminateFlooringSpecificationsandTestMethods, Sections3.2through3.10ASTMC518-15,StandardTestMethodforSteady-StateThermalTransmissionPropertiesbyMeansoftheHeatFlowMeterApparatusASTMC1028-07ε1,StandardTestMethodforDeterminingtheStaticCoefficientofFrictionofCeramicTileandOtherLikeSurfacesbytheHorizontalDynamometerPull-MeterMethodASTME648-15,StandardTestMethod forCritical Fluxof Floor-Covering SystemsUsingaRadiantHeatEnergySourceASTME662-15a,StandardTestMethodforSpecificOpticalDensityofSmokeGeneratedbySolidMaterialsASTM E90-09, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne SoundTransmissionLossofBuildingPartitionsandElementsASTM E492-09(2016) ε1, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of ImpactSoundTransmissionThroughFloor-CeilingAssembliesUsingtheTappingMachineASTMF970-15,StandardTestMethodforStaticLoadLimitASTMF1700-13a,StandardSpecificationforSolidVinylTile,Sections6.7and6.8CDPHCaliforniaSpecification01350,StandardTestMethod forTestingandEvaluationofVolatileOrganic Chemical Emissions From Indoor SourcesUsing Environmental ChambersVersion1.1

G3432.01-106-31Page6of21

ProductDescription:TheLuxuryVinylFlooringwassubmittedto Intertek-ATIbyCaliBambooonOctober31,2016andconsistedofvariousspecimensizesforeachASTMstandardspecimensize requirement. The material was tested as-received with the exception of machining thesmallertestspecimensfromthepieces.TestProceduresandTestResults:Thetestingproceduresandresultsobtainedfromtestingarereported as follows. All conditioning of test specimens and test conditionswere at standardlaboratoryconditionsunlessotherwisereported.RefertothetestrelatedphotosinAppendixB.

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.2ThicknessSwell

TwonominallysixinchsquareflooringspecimensweretestedinaccordancewithANSI/NALFALF-01-2011, Section 3.2. The attached underlayment was removed prior to testing. Eachspecimenwasmeasuredforthicknessattheedgeofthemiddlepointonallfoursidespriortobeing submersedunder1 in.±0.1 in.ofdeionizedwatermaintainedat68°F±2°F. Specimensremained submerged for 24 hours ±0.25 hours. Final thickness measurements were takenwithin15minutesofremovalfromthewater.Allthicknessmeasurementsweretakenusingamicrometer(ICN:65687).Theresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

Section3.2ThicknessSwellResults

SpecimenNo.

LocationInitial

Thickness(in)Final

Thickness(in)(%)Thickness

Increase

AverageThickness

Increase(%)A 0.22585 0.23635 5B 0.22990 0.23725 3C 0.23195 0.23695 2

1

D 0.23295 0.24165 4A 0.22570 0.23745 5B 0.22675 0.23700 5C 0.23130 0.23755 3

2

D 0.22640 0.23615 4

4

G3432.01-106-31Page7of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.3LightResistance

Onehalfoftheeachspecimenfacewascoveredpriortoexposuretobeusedasthecontrolinevaluating the light resistance. Two specimens of light and dark variations were exposed toacceleratedweathering cycle per ANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section 3.3 inside anAtlas Ci5000Weatherometer (ICN:63081)atan irradiance levelof1.10W/m2at340nmwavelength.Theblackpanelthermometerwassetto70°C,drybulbat50°C,wetbulbat39°C,continuouswater20°C, total irradiance of 396 kj/m2. The specimens were exposed for 100 hours. Specimenswere allowed to recover for a 24 hour ±1 hour period without exposure of light. At theconclusionoftherecoveryperiod,specimenswereviewedonahorizontalsurfaceilluminatedasoutlinedinSection3.3.4.3withthenakedeyeatadistanceof30to36inchesonanangleofapproximately 45° to 75° to the horizontal plane. The results are displayedwithin the tablebelow.

Section3.3LightResistanceResults

SpecimenType

SpecimenNo. LightResistanceGrade

1 NoEffectLight

2 NoEffect1 NoEffect

Dark2 NoEffect

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.4CleanabilityandStainResistance

Fifteen specimenswere tested in accordancewithANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section3.4. Eachspecimensurfacewascleanedandallowedtothoroughlydrypriortochemicalexposure.A6mm(1/4in.)spotofeachreagentwasappliedtothesurfaceofeachspecimen,coveredwithawatchglass.Watchglasswasmovedaroundtospreadauniformcoatofthereagentacrossthespecimensurface.Watchglasswaspositionedsoreagentwaspartiallycoveredforaperiodof16 to 24 hours. At the end of test period, each test specimen was cleaned and graded inaccordancewithSection3.4.4.9.Each specimenwasgivena cleanability scoreandevaluatedforstainresistance.Theresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

G3432.01-106-31Page8of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.4CleanabilityandStainResistance(Continued)

Section3.4CleanabilityandStainResistanceResults

Reagent StainGradeScore StainResistanceDistilledWater 0 NoEffectEthanolSolution 0 NoEffect

Acetone 0 NoEffect HouseholdAmmonia 0 NoEffect

10%CitricAcid 0 NoEffect VegetableOil 0 NoEffect

Coffee 0 NoEffect Tea 0 NoEffect

Ketchup 0 NoEffect Mustard 1 NoEffect

10%PovidoneIodine 0 NoEffectBlackPermanentMarker 3 NoEffect

#2Pencil 1 NoEffectWaxCrayon 2 NoEffect

BlackPasteShoePolish 3 NoEffectTotalStainGradeScore 10

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.5LargeBallImpactResistance

Testing was performed in accordance with ANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section 3.5. The testspecimen was clamped to an Impactor (ICN: 006000) equipped with a 225 gram 1-1/2 in.diametersteelball.Impactsweremadefromseveraldropheights,including67.5inches,whichisthemaximumheightoftheimpactor.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

Section3.5LargeBallImpactResistanceResults

ImpactNo.ImpactLevel(in) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

31.5 P 39.5 P 47.5 P 55.5 P P P 67.5 P P P

G3432.01-106-31Page9of21

Note:Therewerenosignsofcrackingattheimpactpointonthespecimenforeachofthe impacts.

G3432.01-106-31Page10of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.6SmallBallImpactResistance

Testing was performed in accordance with ANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section 3.6. The testspecimenwasplacedonthesmallballImpactor(ICN:INT00528)equippedwitha25gramsteeldarttippedwitha5mmdiametersteelball.Impactsbeganatthestartingheightof5inches.Iffailurewasnotobserved,theimpactheightwasraised1inch.Nofailureswereobserveduptothe height of 21 inches so three impacts were made from a drop height of 32 inches themaximumheightoftheimpactor.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

Section3.6SmallBallImpactResistance

ImpactNo.ImpactLevel(in) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

5 P 6 P 7 P 8 P 9 P 10 P 11 P 12 P 13 P 14 P 15 P 16 P 17 P 18 P 19 P 20 P 21 P 32 P P P

Note: There were no signs of cracking at the impact point on the specimen for each of theimpacts.

G3432.01-106-31Page11of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.7WearResistance

Testing was performed in accordance with ANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section 3.7 on twonominallyfourinchsquarespecimens.TestspecimensweresecuredtotheTaber5130Abraser(ICN:Y001522).StandardizationoftheabrasivewasperformedasdetailedinSection3.7.4withS-34 zinc plates and a correction factor calculated. The specimen surface was cleaned andabraded in 200 revolution cycles in accordancewith Section 3.7.5 until an initialwear pointgreater than or equal to 0.60 mm2 was observed and documented utilizing a TAPPI SizeEstimationChart.Specimenswere thenabraded in25 revolutioncyclesand inspecteduntilathirdwearpointwasobservedanddocumented. Test results aredisplayedwithin the tablesbelow.

Section3.7Standardization

Mass(g) WeightLoss(mg)CalibrationStandard W1 W2 W3 W1-W2 W2-W3

CorrectionFactor

S-34ZincPlate 57.068 56.971 56.861 97 110 0.9409

Section3.7WearResistance

WearPointSpecimenNo. 1stQuadrant

No.ofCycles3rdQuadrantNo.ofCycles

WearResistance

CorrectionFactor

1 4,600 4,725 4,446

2 4,400 4,675 4,399

Average 4,500 4,700 4,422

WearResistance 4,400

G3432.01-106-31Page12of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.8DimensionalTolerances

Testing was performed in accordance with ANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section 3.8 on five fullsheet specimens. All visual inspections and measurements were conducted according to allapplicablecriteriafoundinSection3.8utilizingcalipers(ICN:65102)forallmeasurements.Thedimensional tolerances, the difference between theminimumandmaximummeasurements,aredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

Section3.8DimensionalTolerancesResults

Parameter Tolerance(in)

Length 0.000

Width 0.007

Thickness 0.007

Straightness 0.007

Squareness 0.000

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.9CastorChairResistance

Testing was performed at Intertek Kentwood, located in Kentwood, Michigan. Refer tocomprehensivereport102754999GRR-001.

G3432.01-106-31Page13of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ANSI/NALFALF-01-2011,Section3.10SurfaceBonding

Testing was performed in accordance with ANSI/NALFA LF-01-2011, Section 3.10 on fivespecimenpanelswithnominaldimensions175mmx125mmx7mm.Eachspecimensurfacewaspreparedwithacirculargrooveintothedecorativefaceandextending0.0-0.3mmintothecorecreatingatestareaof35.7±2mm.Thesurfaceofeachspecimenwaslightlycleanedwithisopropylalcohol,anda35.6mmdiameteraluminumpull-offtabwasfirmlysecuredwithLoctiteE-40HTHysol®EpoxyAdhesive.Theadhesivewasallowedtocureforaminimumof48hoursprior toeach specimenbeing individually secured to the test stageof an Instron3369UniversalTestMachine(ICN:005740)utilizing10kNLoadCell (ICN:005965).Tensile loadwasuniformlyapplied to thepull-off tabata rateof41.4N/mm2/minuntil failurewasobserved.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

Section3.10SurfaceBondingResults

SpecimenID

TestAreaDiameter(mm)

PeakLoad(N)

TensileStrength(N/mm2)

FailureModeLocation

1 1,850 1.86 10%Core-AdhesiveFailure

2 1,690 1.70 100%CoreFailure

3 2,210 2.22 100%CoreFailure 4 2,420 2.43 100%CoreFailure 5

35.611

2,150 2.16 100%CoreFailure Mean 2,070 2.07

StandardDeviation 293 0.29

ASTMC518-HeatFlowMeterTesting

Testing for ASTM C518-15 was performed at Intertek Middleton, located in Middleton,Wisconsin.Refertocomprehensivereport102757999MID-004.

G3432.01-106-31Page14of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ASTMC1028-CoefficientofFriction

Testingwas performed in accordancewithASTMC1028-07ε1. Three specimenswere used inthisevaluation.TestingwasconductedusingathreeinchsquareNeolitepad(ShoreA96)andadigitalforcegage(ICN:63711).Asledwithaweightof51.6lbswaspulledalongthesurfaceofthevinylflooringwithincreasingforceuntilanoticeableslipoccurred.Forthewetmethod,theNeolite pad was saturated for five minutes before fully saturating the surface of the vinylflooringandthetestingwasrepeated.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablesbelow.

CalibrationDataSledAssemblyWeight(W)=51.6lbs

(3"Neolitepad)

DryCalibration WetCalibration

PullNo. Result(lbs) PullNo. Result(lbs)

1 37.3 1 14.0

2 36.0 2 14.2

3 35.9 3 14.8

4 37.4 4 14.0

Total(RD) 146.6 Total(RW) 57

XD 0.128

XW 0.225

Calibrationcalculation(Dry):XD=

Calibrationcalculation(Wet):XW=

WhereRisthetotalvalueofthepullsconducted,Nequalsthetotalnumberofpulls(i.e.four)andWistheweightofthesledassembly(SeeSections7and9inASTMC1028-07e1forfurtherdetail).

ThecalculationfortheCoefficientofFriction:FD=

WhereRisthetotalvalueofthepullsconducted,Nequalsthetotalnumberofpulls(i.e.12),WistheweightofthesledassemblyandXisthecalibrationadjustmentfactor.(SeeSections8and10inASTMC1028-07e1forfurtherdetail).

G3432.01-106-31Page15of21

TestProcedureandTestResults:(Continued)

ASTMC1028Results(Continued)

DryStaticCoefficientofFriction

SpecimenNo. PullOrientation Result(lbs)

0° 39.0

90° 39.2

180° 37.6

270° 39.8

Total(RD) 155.6

1

CoefficientofFriction(FD) 0.90

0° 36.2

90° 36.2

180° 38.7

270° 37.8

Total(RD) 148.9

2

CoefficientofFriction(FD) 0.87

0° 35.8

90° 37.6

180° 34.9

270° 38.7

Total(RD) 147

3

CoefficientofFriction(FD) 0.86

AverageCoefficientofFriction(FD) 0.88

G3432.01-106-31Page16of21

TestProcedureandTestResults:(Continued)

ASTMC1028Results(Continued)

WetStaticCoefficientofFriction

SpecimenNo. PullOrientation Result(lbs)

0° 33.1

90° 35.9

180° 35.9

270° 36.7

Total(RD) 141.6

1

CoefficientofFriction(FW) 0.93

0° 35.8

90° 37.1

180° 37.2

270° 39.7

Total(RD) 149.8

2

CoefficientofFriction(FW) 0.97

0° 38.6

90° 39.0

180° 38.9

270° 41.1

Total(RD) 157.6

3

CoefficientofFriction(FW) 1.01

AverageCoefficientofFriction(FW) 0.97

ASTME648-CriticalRadiantFluxofFloor-CoveringSystems

TestingforASTME648-15wasperformedat IntertekElmendorf, located inElmendorf,Texas.Refertocomprehensivereport102757999SAT-001.

ASTME662-OpticalDensityofSmoke

Testing for ASTM E662-15a was performed at Intertek Middleton, located in Middleton,Wisconsin.Refertocomprehensivereport102757999MID-003.

G3432.01-106-31Page17of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ASTME90-AirborneSoundTransmissionLoss

TestingforASTME90-09wasperformedatIntertekYork, locatedinYork,Pennsylvania.RefertocomprehensivereportsG3432.02-113-11-R1,G3432.03-113-11-R0,G3432.04-113-11-R1,andG3432.05-113-11-R1.

ASTME492-ImpactSoundTransmission

Testing for ASTM E492-09(2016) ε1 was performed to Intertek York, located in York,Pennsylvania. Refer to comprehensive reports G3432.02-113-11-R1, G3432.03-113-11-R0,G3432.04-113-11-R1,andG3432.05-113-11-R1.

ASTMF970-StaticLoad

TestingwasperformedinaccordancewithASTMF970-15.Threespecimenswereusedforthisevaluation. Prior to testing the center of each sample was measured for thickness using aDigital Indicator (ICN: Y000118). The samples were then alternately stacked under steelindenter plates having a one square inch circular loading area. A load of 250 pounds wasappliedtothecombinedstackofsamplesandloadingplatesforaperiodof24hours.Aftertheremoval of the weight, the samples were allowed to recover for a period of 24 hours. Theindentationdepthwas thenmeasuredusing the sameDigital Indicator and averaged for thethreesamples.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

StaticLoadResults

SampleOriginal

Thickness(in)Post-test

Thickness(in)Residual

Indentation(in)1 0.2840 0.2820 0.0020

2 0.2845 0.2825 0.0020

3 0.2845 0.2820 0.0025

Average 0.0022

G3432.01-106-31Page18of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ASTMF2199DimensionalStability

The dimensional stability evaluation specified in ASTM F1700, Section 6.7 was conducted inaccordance with the procedures detailed in ASTM F2199 for both machine and crosswisedirections for the provided product. In accordance with ASTM F2199, Section 6.1, a 9.0 in.square specimenwas prepared from a full-size tile specimen and allowed to condition for aperiodof24hoursatstandardlaboratoryconditions(23±1ºC,50±5%relativehumidity)priorto initialmeasurementofbothspecimenedges inboth length (machinedirection)andwidth(crosswise direction)with 12.0 in. digital calipers (ICN: 65102). The specimenwas then ovenexposedat180±3.6°F(82±2°C)forsixhourspriortoremovalandre-acclimationtostandardlaboratoryconditionsforaminimumof24hours.Post-exposuremeasurementsweretakenandinitial measurements were subtracted as specified in Section 9.1 to determine dimensionalstability. Product performance was evaluated against the criteria presented in ASTM F1700,Section6.7.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablesbelow.

ASTMF2199DimensionalStability

MeasurementExposureConditions

MeasuredLength(in)

DeviationFromInitialLength

ProductionDirection

No.Temp(°C)

Duration(hrs)

InitialPost

Exposure(in) (in/linealfoot)

1 11.725 11.619 -0.106 -0.1042 11.729 11.620 -0.109 -0.1073 11.730 11.614 -0.116 -0.113

Machine

4

82 6

11.728 11.608 -0.120 -0.117SeriesMean -0.110

MeasurementExposureConditions

MeasuredLength(in)

DeviationFromInitialLength

ProductionDirection

No.Temp(°C)

Duration(hrs)

InitialPost

Exposure(in) (in/linealfoot)

1 7.414 7.430 0.016 0.0102 7.414 7.431 0.017 0.0113 7.415 7.432 0.017 0.011

Crosswise

4

82 6

7.415 7.432 0.017 0.011SeriesMean 0.010

G3432.01-106-31Page19of21

TestProceduresandTestResults:(Continued)

ASTMF925ResistancetoChemicals

The chemical resistance exposure specified in ASTM F1700, Section 6.8 was conducted inaccordancewiththeproceduresdetailedinASTMF925-13,onatotaloftwelve6.0in.x6.0in.specimenspreparedfromfull-sizetilespecimens.PreandpostcolorreadingsweretakenusingaSpectrometerColori5(ICN:004725).ThespecimenswereexposedtothereagentsspecifiedinASTMF1700,Sections6.8.1-6.8.12underawatchglassforaperiodof60±1minutespriortoremovalofthereagentandblottingdryofthesurfaceasdetailedinASTMF925,Section8.10andvisualexaminationoftheexposedareaagainstanadjacent,unexposedareaasspecifiedinSection9.1.Post-exposureperformancewasratedonthescalepresentedinSection9.2.Post-exposure performance was further evaluated against the criteria presented in ASTM F1700,Section6.8.Testresultsaredisplayedwithinthetablebelow.

ASTMF925ResistancetoChemicals

ExposureDetails Observations1F1700Sub-

Section ChemicalSurfaceDulling

ColorChange(Staining)

SurfaceAttack

ColorChangeΔE

6.8.1 Whitevinegar(5%aceticacid) 0 0 0 0.116.8.2 Rubbingalcohol(70%Isopropanol) 0 0 0 0.076.8.3 Whitemineraloil(medicinalgrade) 0 0 0 0.206.8.4 Sodiumhydroxidesolution(5%NaOH) 0 0 0 0.226.8.5 Hydrochloricacidsolution(5%HCl) 0 0 0 0.116.8.6 SulfuricAcidSolution(5%H2SO4) 0 0 0 0.086.8.7 Householdammoniasolution(5%NH4OH) 0 0 0 0.146.8.8 Householdbleach(5.25%NaOCl) 0 0 0 0.066.8.9 Oliveoil(light) 0 0 0 0.316.8.10 Kerosene(K1) 0 0 0 0.066.8.11 Unleadedgasoline(RegularGrade) 0 0 0 0.066.8.12 Phenol(5%activephenol) 0 0 0 0.111ASTMF925,Section9.2visualevaluationratingsareasfollows:0=Nochange,1=SlightChange,2=ModerateChange,3=SevereChange

G3432.01-106-31Page20of21

Intertek-ATIwillservicethisreportfortheentiretestrecordretentionperiod.Testrecordsthatareretainedsuchasdetaileddrawings,datasheets,representativesamplesoftestspecimens,or other pertinent project documentationwill be retained by Intertek-ATI for the entire testrecordretentionperiod.Resultsobtainedaretestedvaluesandweresecuredusingthedesignatedtestmethods.Thisreportdoesnotconstitutecertificationofthisproductnoranopinionorendorsementbythislaboratory. It is theexclusivepropertyof the client sonamedherein and relatesonly to thespecimen(s) tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without the writtenapprovalofIntertek-ATI.ForINTERTEK-ATI:J.RichHammons DawnM.ChaneyTechnicianII TechnicianTeamLeadComponents/MaterialsTesting Components/MaterialsTestingJRH:dmc/kfAttachments(pages) Thisreportiscompleteonlywhenallattachmentslistedareincluded. AppendixA-Photographs(6)

G3432.01-106-31Page21of21

RevisionLogRev.# Date Page(s) Revision(s)

0 01/24/17 N/A Originalreportissue

ThisreportproducedfromcontrolleddocumenttemplateATI00231,revised11/22/16.

G3432.01-106-31

APPENDIXA

Photographs

G3432.01-106-31

PhotoNo.13.2-ThicknessSwellMeasurementDetail(Typical)

PhotoNo.23.3-LightResistanceSpecimensPost-TestResults

G3432.01-106-31

PhotoNo.33.4-CleanabilityStainResistancePost-TestResults

PhotoNo.43.5-LargeBallImpactTestSetup

G3432.01-106-31

PhotoNo.53.6-SmallBallImpactTestPost-TestResult

PhotoNo.63.7-WearResistancePost-TestSpecimens

G3432.01-106-31

PhotoNo.73.8-DimensionalToleranceTestIn-Progress

PhotoNo.83.10-SurfaceBondPost-TestSpecimen

G3432.01-106-31

PhotoNo.9ASTMC1028-CoefficientofFrictionTestingSetup

PhotoNo.10ASTMF970-StaticLoadTestSetupDetail

G3432.01-106-31

PhotoNo.11ASTMF1700Sec.6.7-DimensionalStabilityPost-TestResultDetail

PhotoNo.12ASTMF1700Sec.6.8-ResistancetoChemicalsTestIn-Progress