perspectives on fiduciary responsibility planning for ...€¦ · jane jones board member yes yes...
TRANSCRIPT
Perspectives on Fiduciary Responsibility
• Michael Gouldin, Gouldin & McCarthy
• Dave Dacey, WithumSmith+Brown
• June 8, 2011
Planning for Recent Developments and Best Practice Considerations
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
1
Today’s Disclaimer
The information presented in this webinar represent our perspectives, is not necessarily all inclusive, does not constitute legal or any other advice, and should not be relied upon
without first consulting with appropriate qualified professionals for your plan’s individual
facts and circumstances.
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
2
Understanding Respective Roles
• Auditors audit, identify findings and communicate findings to clients
• Co-fiduciaries work to maintain the successful operations of the plan
• Qualified ERISA attorneys practice law to help plans stay in compliance and out of trouble
• Plan sponsors are ultimately responsible for the successful operation of the plan
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
3
Who are Considered Fiduciaries?
• Exercise any discretionary authority or control over:– Managing the plan
– Managing or disposing assets of the plan
• Renders (or has authority to render) investment advice for a fee or other direct or indirect compensation
• Has discretionary authority or responsibility in administrating the plan
1
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
4
Let’s Look at an
Example Evaluation!
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
5
Dealing With Plan Deficiencies
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
6
Auditing ConsiderationsPlan Deficiencies
Disclosure and / or Auditor Report Management Comment Requirement
Prohibited party-in-interest transaction disclosure
Tax status for potential plan disqualification disclosure
Supplemental schedules
• Loans or fixed income obligations in default
• Leases in default
• Untimely deposits
• Non-exempt prohibited transactions
Breach of fiduciary responsibility
Prohibited party-in-interest transactions
Loan or leases in default
2
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
7
Auditing Prohibited Transactions• Be aware of the possibility of party in interest
transactions prohibited by ERISA
• For possible prohibited transactions:
– Gain understanding of the transaction
– Evaluate effect on audit and financials (Consult specialist as needed)
– Adequacy of disclosures (including contingencies) and required supplemental schedules
– Evaluate management representations
• Fiduciary requirement to restore profits that the fiduciary made to participants
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
8
Can a Loss of Tax Exempt Status Happen?
• March 2011 – Christy & Swan Profit Sharing Plan– Plan failed to keep current with changes to the tax
code
– Plan argued there was no need to keep the plan current since there were no new contributions
– Tax court recently upheld IRS decision to revoke tax deferred status of the plan
• January 2011 – Hollen dealing with adopting amendments with incorrect effective dates
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
9
Another Loss of Tax Exempt Status
• 1981 – Tionesta Sand and Gravel
• Failure to include language requiring full vesting on any plan termination
• Repercussions of retroactive plan disqualification
– Trust income becomes taxable
– Plan sponsor contributions are disallowed
– Plan sponsor penalties for failure to withhold payroll taxes
– Participants are taxed with no rollover eligibility
3
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
10
Fees and the DOL
• First 408(b)(2)
• Then Form 5500 Schedule C
• Then Quarterly Participant Reporting of Fees
• First Schedule C
• Then Question #40 (Good Faith Effort)
• 408(b)(2) Planned Rollout Originally Effective July 2011
• 5 ½ Month Deferral of 408(b)(2) Until January 1, 2012
• Quarterly Participant Fee Disclosure Rules Effective January 1, 2012
What was Planned What Actually Happened
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
11
Can a Plan Sponsor Be Sued Over Fees?
• July 2009 – Tibble vs. Edison, International– Edison offered retail share classes as investment
options, which have higher fees than institutional investments
– Court found that Edison should have considered offering institutional shares
– Judgment subject to appeal approximately $300,000
• April 2011 – George vs. Kraft Foods– Not clear whether reliance on a consultant was
sufficient to show that the plan committee acted appropriately (e.g. no factors considered in minutes)
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
12
So Does This Mean That Retail Plan Investments are Not Acceptable to My Plan?
• No, they are typically acceptable.
• Size matters
• Reasonable fees are based on several variables, including average account balance
• 401(k) Averages Book www.401(k)source.com
4
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
13
SPD vs. Plan Document
• CIGNA Corporation v. Amara
• Supreme Court ruled that the terms of SPD may not be enforced if such terms are contrary to the plan document
• Message point is that the SPD and operations of the plan need to be consistent with the plan document
• Monitoring should clearly document the actions of fiduciaries vs. plan document
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
14
A Trend Towards Disclosure
• More fee disclosure – 408(b)(2) and quarterly
• Clarity disclosure for targeted date funds
• Future projected benefits for 401(k) plans
• E-Fast2 as a benchmarking vehicle
Click to edit Master title style
• Click to edit Master text styles
– Second level
• Third level
15
Enjoy the Rest of Your Day!
Mike Gouldin; Gouldin & McCarthy; [email protected]
Dave Dacey; WithumSmith+Brown; [email protected]
5
Perspectives on Fiduciary Responsibility Example Evaluation of Plan Fiduciaries June 8, 2011 The following is a summary of an evaluation of the ABC Plan’s Fiduciaries for the year ended December 31, 2010, along with a basis for conclusions reached:
Name
Title
Any One of These Conditions Would Trigger a Fiduciary Relationship
Exercise Discretionary
Authority or Control Over the Plan or Its
Assets
Renders (or has Authority to Render)
Investment Advice for a Fee or Other Direct or Indirect Compensation
Has Discretionary
Authority or Responsibility in
Administering the Plan
Plan Sponsor Yes Yes, through overseeing its relationships with outside professionals.
Yes
John Jones 100% Stockholder
Yes Yes (See above) Yes
Jane Jones Board Member Yes Yes (See above) Yes Jim Jones (no relation to John)
CFO Yes, Jim hired the firm, which decides on the investments that are made.
Yes (See above) Yes
Joan Jones (also no relation)
HR Director No authority Has no involvement in this area.
Yes. Joan oversees that employee elective deferrals are made timely to the investment custodian.
Pensions are Us TPA No discretion. Has no involvement in this area.
Yes, Pensions are Us are actively involved in administering the plan.
Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc. Etc.
6
Perspectives on Fiduciary Responsibility Example Evaluation of Plan Document Monitoring June 8, 2011 The following is a summary of an evaluation of the ABC Plan’s Operations, as compared to the Summary Plan Description and the Plan Document for the year ended December 31, 2010:
Plan Process Requirements Per Plan Document
Requirements Per Summary Plan
Description
Standard Processes In Place
Eligibility Timeliness of Employee Elective Deferral Contributions
Employer Matching Contributions
Etc. Etc. Etc.
7