peru c o n s u l t i n g peru programme assurance method
TRANSCRIPT
peruperuc o n s u l t i n gc o n s u l t i n g
PeruProgramme Assurance Method
© Peru Consulting 2014
Our Programme Assurance method provides clear focus
Slide 2
Business Objectives
Cost/Time/ Quality
Sourcing / Suppliers
TechnologyProcess
People
Relation-ships
ProgrammeAssurance
© Peru Consulting 2014
Using a simple, clear, tried and tested methodology. Emphasising the key risk areas likely to impact project delivery:
Project – Requirements against quality and timescales, and by implication budget.
People – Governance & structure, Relationships, skills and availability. Process – Methods, and quality assurance. Environment – Technology, Tools and the external environment.
Rapidly highlighting risks, issues and hidden dependencies that could impact success whilst defining pragmatic actions to resolve them.
Covering the breadth of the programme whilst allowing drill down on specific areas when issues are detected.
Linking with project delivery benchmarks to provide meaningful metrics
around cost, time and remaining effort.
We provide a practical assessment based on experience
Slide 3
© Peru Consulting 2014
Whilst making use of proven methods
Slide 4
© Peru Consulting 2014
Overcoming barriers to change
Slide 5
© Peru Consulting 2014
Our overall Assurance process
Slide 6
Agree termsof reference
Interview key staff
Document & data review
Site visits
Analysis Action
Peru &external data
© Peru Consulting 2014
Our Assurance is both broad and deep
Slide 7
Project
Scope & Requirements
DeliveryTimescale
QualityRequired
Cost
People
Organisation& Structure
Motivation& Focus
Skills &Experience
Number &Availability
A Project is delivered...
...by people & teams...
...using processes...
...onto an environment.
© Peru Consulting 2014
Example high level output is shown below
Slide 8
Project
Scope& Requirements
DeliveryTimescale
QualityRequired
Cost
People
Organisation& Structure
Motivation& Focus
Skills &Experience
Number &Availability
Processes
Stakeholder Management
QAMethods & Standards
ProjectManagement
• Timescales aggressive given level of staff skills and number, otherwise fine.
• Already one month behind, can be recovered but needs project governance to be strengthened .
• Critical: Staff resources approx 20%less than expected to meet dates.
• Critical: Staff have no previous experience of development tools or application set.
• Processes as expected on a project of this size and complexity.
• No changes required.
• Some external supplier risks. Mitigation Plan is attached.
• No urgent work required here.
© Peru Consulting 2014
Outputs from the assessment
Slide 9
Report content: Overall Health Assessment
Dashboard Health Check
Governance Themes Spreadsheet results
Areas of Concern
Recommended Actions
Agreed Action Plan
Learning Points
peruperuc o n s u l t i n gc o n s u l t i n g
Trusted. Independent. Experts.