pest management practices - cornell university · 4/4/2000 · targeted during the survey such as...
TRANSCRIPT
United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture
NationalAgriculturalStatisticsService
Sp Cr 1 (00)
Pest Mana gementPractices1999 Summar y
April 2000
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 1 NASS, USDA
1999 Pest Management Practices
Overview : The pest management practices in this report are based on data compiled from a survey conducted in the Fall of1999. All results refer to responses from sampled producersconcerning specific practices. The producers were asked how manyacres of a specific commodity they had and what pesticidemanagement practices they used. The producers were asked a seriesof questions to which they responded yes or no. Pests weredefined as weeds, insects, and diseases. If the respondent used aspecific practice on a crop, it was assumed that the practice wasused on all of the acres of that crop. For example, if a producerhad 500 acres of wheat, and used field mapping of previous weedproblems to assist in making weed management decisions, it wasassumed that all 500 acres were mapped.
For this report, each question has been categorized into one offour pest management categories: prevention, avoidance,monitoring, and suppression. However, not all possible questionsregarding specific management practices in each category wereasked. A copy of the actual questions used to collect these datais shown on pages 34-35.
The data are published in two tables for each crop: percent ofacres receiving the specific pest management practice and percentof farms using the specific pest management practice. Thesepercentages are published at the U.S. and regional level. Forbarley, corn, soybeans, wheat, fruits and nuts, vegetables, andall other crops and cropland pasture, the percentages refer onlyto farms and planted acres. For alfalfa hay and other hay, thepercentages refer only to farms and harvested acres. A singleasterisk in the table means there were too few reports to publishthe percentage while a double asterisk means the percentage isless than one percent. A blank indicates there were no reports ofthe practice being used. An NA, not applicable, indicates noquestions were asked for that particular practice that year.
Prevention is the practice of keeping a pest population frominfesting a crop or field. It includes such tactics as usingpest-free seeds and transplants, preventing weeds fromreproducing, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to insectsor disease, irrigation scheduling to avoid situations conducive todisease development, cleaning tillage and harvesting equipmentbetween fields or operations, using field sanitation procedures,and eliminating alternate hosts or sites for insect pests anddisease organisms.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 2 NASS, USDA
The following questions were categorized as prevention practices: Did you clean tillage or harvesting implements after completing fieldwork for the purpose of reducing the spread of weeds, diseases or other pests? Did you remove or plow down crop residues to control pests?
Did you use practices such as tilling, mowing, burning, or chopping of field edges, lanes, ditches, roadways or fence lines to manage pests?
Did you use water management practices, such as controlled drainage or irrigation scheduling, excluding chemigation, to control pests?
Avoidance may be practiced when pest populations exist in a fieldor site but the impact of the pest on the crop can be avoidedthrough some cultural practice. Examples of avoidance tacticsinclude crop rotation such that the crop of choice is not a hostfor the pest, choosing cultivars with genetic resistance to pests,using trap crops, choosing cultivars with maturity dates that mayallow harvest before pest populations develop, fertilizationprograms to promote rapid crop development, and simply notplanting certain areas of fields where pest populations are likelyto cause crop failure. Some tactics for prevention and avoidancestrategies may overlap.
The following questions were categorized as avoidance practices:
Did you use any crop varieties that were genetically modified to be resistant to insects (Bt, etc.)?
Did you adjust planting or harvesting dates to control pests?
Did you rotate crops for the purpose of controlling pests?
Did you use any crop varieties that were genetically modified to be resistant to plant pathogens or nematodes causing plant diseases?
Did you choose planting locations to avoid cross infestation of insects or disease?
Did you grow a trap crop to help control insects?
Monitoring includes proper identification of pests through surveysor scouting programs, including trapping, weather monitoring, andsoil testing where appropriate.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 3 NASS, USDA
The following questions were categorized as monitoring practices:
Was this crop scouted for pests (weeds, insects or disease) using a systematic method?
Were electronic or written records kept to track the activity or numbers of different pests? Did you use field mapping of previous weed problems to assist you in making weed management decisions?
Did you use soil analysis to detect the presence of soilborne pests or pathogens?
Did you use pheromones to monitor the presence of pests by trapping? Did you use weather monitoring to predict the need for pesticide applications?
Suppression tactics include cultural practices such as narrow rowspacings or optimized in-row plant populations, alternativetillage approaches such as no-till or strip-till systems, covercrops or mulches, or using crops with allelopathic potential inthe rotation. Physical suppression tactics may includecultivation or mowing for weed control, baited or pheromone trapsfor certain insects, and temperature management or exclusiondevices for insect and disease management. Biological controls,including mating disruption for insects, could be considered asalternatives to conventional pesticides, especially where long-term control of an especially troublesome pest species can beobtained. Chemical pesticides are important and some use willremain necessary. However, pesticides should be applied as a lastresort in suppression systems.
The following questions were categorized as suppression practices:
Did you use any crop varieties that were genetically modified to be resistant to specific herbicides (Roundup Ready, Liberty Link, Poast-Protected corn, STS soybean, IT corn)?
Did you use scouting data and compare it to university or extension guidelines for infestation thresholds to determine when to take measures to control pests?
Did you use beneficial organisms (insects, nematodes or fungi) to control pests?
Did you use topically applied biological pesticides such as Bt (Bacillus Thuringiensis), insect growth regulators, neem or other natural products to control pests?
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 4 NASS, USDA
Did you maintain ground covers, mulches or physical barriers to reduce pest problems?
Did you adjust row spacing, plant density or row direction to control pests?
Did you alternate pesticides to keep pests from becoming resistant to pesticides (use pesticides with different mechanisms of action)?
Did you use pheromones to control pests by disrupting mating?
Questions asked during the 1999 survey but not asked during the1998 survey were:
Did you choose planting locations to avoid cross infestation of insects or disease?
Did you grow a trap crop to help control pests?
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 5 NASS, USDA
Regions:
Northeast CT, DE, ME, MD, MA, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT
North Central IL, IN, IA, KS, MI, MN, MO, NE, ND, OH, SD, WI
South AL, AR, FL, GA, KY, LA, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, TX, VA, WV
West AZ, CA, CO, ID, MT, NV, NM, OR, UT, WA, WY
Alaska and Hawaii were not included in the survey.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 6 NASS, USDA
Highlights
Barley: The leading pest management practice for barley was rotating crops to control pests. Fifty-nine percent of the farms usedthis practice on 67 percent of the acres across the United States. Pestmanagement practices used on over 40 percent of the barley acres includetillage practices to manage pests, cleaning implements after fieldwork,rotating crops to control pests, scouting for pests to make decisions,and using alternate pesticides.
Corn: Rotating crops to control pests was used on 77 percent of the corn acres and was the leading pest management practice forcorn. It was also the most widely used practice in terms of number offarms, at 67 percent. Scouting for pests was reported on 55 percent ofthe corn acres. Use of alternate pesticides and using tillage practicesto manage pests were also common, each being reported on nearly half ofthe corn acres.
Cotton: Scouting for pests was used by 71 percent of the cotton farms on 78 percent of the cotton acres. Prevention practices, suchas using tillage practices to manage pests, removing or plowing downcrop residue, and cleaning implements after fieldwork were used on morethan half of the cotton farms and acres. Other practices used on 50percent or more of the acres include using records to keep track ofpests and using pheromones to monitor pests.
Soybeans: The most common pest management practice was rotating crops to control soybean pests, which was done on 76 percent ofthe soybean acres and on 73 percent of the soybean farms. Otherpractices used on 40 percent or more of the acres included tillage tomanage pests, clean implements after fieldwork, scouting for pests, andusing crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant.
All Wheat: The leading pest management practice used on wheat was rotating crops to control pests, which was used by 48percent of the wheat farms on 56 percent of the wheat acres. Cleaningimplements after fieldwork was the second most widely used practice,with 49 percent of the acres and 33 percent of the farms. Using tillageto manage pests and scouting for pests were each reported on 40 percentor more of the acres.
Alfalfa Hay: Scouting for pests was the most widely used pest management practice on alfalfa acreage at 29 percent. Rotating crops to control pests was used on 28 percent of the alfalfaacreage and 27 percent of the farms while tillage was used to controlpests on 22 percent of the acres.
Other Hay: Thirteen percent of the hay acres, other than alfalfa, used tillage practices to manage pests. Cleaningimplements after fieldwork was used on 7 percent of the farms andscouting for pests was used on 6 percent of the farms.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 7 NASS, USDA
Fruits and Nuts: Scouting for pests in fruits and nuts, the most widely used pest management practice, was usedby 72 percent of the fruit and nut farms on 92 percent of theacres. Tillage methods to manage pests and use of alternatepesticides were each used on 73 percent of the fruit and nutacres. More than 35 percent of the farms cleaned implements afterfield work, kept records to track pests, and monitored the weatheras pest management practices.
Vegetables: Eighty-one percent of vegetable acres were scouted for pests, making it the most common pest managementpractice for vegetable crops. Rotating crops was reported on 77percent of the acres, while using tillage to manage pests and useof alternate pesticides were used on more than 60 percent of theacres.
All other Crops and Cropland Pasture: This group includes crops that were not specificallytargeted during the survey such as sorghum, oats, rice, peanuts,etc. The most widely used pest management practice was rotatingcrops to control pests on 48 percent of the acres. Using tillageto manage pests, cleaning implements after fieldwork, and scoutingfor pests, were each used on more than 40 percent of the acres.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 8 NASS, USDA
Planted and Harvested Acres for Selected Crops,by State and Region, 1999 Crop Year
Stateand
Region
Area Planted Area Harvested
Barley 1 Corn Cotton Soybeans All Wheat 1 AlfalfaHay
OtherHay
1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres
CT DE ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT
Northeast
IL IN IA KS MI MN MO NE ND OH SD WI
North Central
30
55
6
75
166
1623
200
51,350
8080
1,754
3816933
4702615
1101,1501,500
3106
3,620
10,8005,800
12,1003,1502,2007,1002,6508,600
8203,4503,6003,600
63,870
33
380
413
205
490
105130370
1,300
10,6005,600
10,8002,8501,9507,0005,4004,3001,3504,6004,1001,350
59,900
75
215
42130195
657
1,05055040
10,000610
2,045980
2,0009,4101,0503,105
133
30,973
117
1260177
30550700
145
1,440
500400
1,300850950
1,600450
1,4001,450
6002,4002,100
13,000
508
1501509055
100950
1,2007
200
2,960
350300400
1,850350850
3,2001,8001,450
7001,600
500
13,350See footnotes at end of table. --continued
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 9 NASS, USDA
Planted and Harvested Acres for Selected Crops,by State and Region, 1999 Crop Year (continued)
Stateand
Region
Area Planted Area Harvested
Barley 1 Corn Cotton Soybeans All Wheat 1 AlfalfaHay
OtherHay
1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres 1,000 Acres
AL 2
AR FL 2
GA 2
KY LA 2
MS 2
NC OK SC 2
TN TX VA WV
South
AZ CA CO ID MT NV NM OR UT WA WY
West
US 3
9
2443
1580
135
6317095
7101,300
5
14590
50090
3,168
5,223
22010590
3501,320
340340750430300630
1,95050060
7,385
50550
1,23016565
1504561
15585
2,556
77,431
565970107
1,470
6151,200
880240330570
6,183110
12,240
275850
77
1,202
14,855
2403,450
20220
1,2001,0201,9501,400
480480
1,250400470
12,580
73,780
14097016
300650110180650
6,400225500
6,20028011
16,632
86590
2,6531,4205,560
17445870176
2,525210
14,552
62,814
20
250
20360
3013012050
980
2001,030
9001,1501,650
255290420540470660
7,565
23,985
8001,220
260600
2,150380850690
2,200300
1,8505,4001,150
530
18,380
4054062028095022590
680160270630
4,485
39,175
1 Includes area planted in preceding fall.2 Alfalfa and alfalfa mixtures are included in all other hay.3 Alaska and Hawaii were not included in the survey.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 10 NASS, USDA
Number of Farms and Land in Farmsby State and Region, 1999 Crop Year
Stateand
Region
Numberof
Farms
Landin
Farms1,000 Acres
CT DE ME MD MA NH NJ NY PA RI VT
Northeast
IL IN IA KS MI MN MO NE ND OH SD WI
North Central
4,0002,6006,900
12,4006,1003,1009,600
39,00059,000
7006,700
150,100
79,00065,00096,00065,00053,00081,000
110,00055,00030,50080,00032,50078,000
825,000
370580
1,2702,100
570420830
7,8007,700
601,340
23,040
27,70015,50033,00047,50010,40028,80030,10046,40039,40014,90044,00016,300
354,000--continued
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 11 NASS, USDA
Number of Farms and Land in Farms,by State and Region, 1999 Crop Year (continued)
Stateand
Region
Numberof
Farms
Landin
Farms1,000 Acres
AL AR FL GA KY LA MS NC OK SC TN TX VA WV
South
AZ CA AZ ID MT NV NM OR UT WA WY
West
US 1
48,00048,50045,00050,00091,00030,00043,00058,00084,00025,00091,000
227,00050,00020,500
911,000
7,70089,00029,00024,50028,0003,000
15,50040,50015,50040,0009,200
301,900
2,188,000
9,20014,65010,40011,20013,6008,150
11,4009,300
34,0004,850
11,900130,500
8,6003,600
281,350
27,50027,80031,80011,90057,0006,800
44,70017,20011,60015,70034,600
286,600
944,9901 Alaska and Hawaii were not included in the survey.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 12 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Barley, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
654918 *
*5
54
*
35396
17
15
*10 ** * * *15
402745 **
1375
41
532024 *
21
17 ** *18 *45
121112
*21
** *
7 * * * *4
** *
** *8 *10
46345711
**3268
**16 **
7128259
**20
**18 ** **116
49 **
43324914
*2271
**NANA
4718219 *16
**9
**1
171144
4331497
**2367
**24 **
6025226
**19
**16 **
1136
44 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percentNA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 13 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Barley, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
372427 *
**3
78
**
331597
8
*9 *
** *
**11
271929 **
1067
16
361116 **
11
8 ** **
9 *26
242414
*32
* *
19 * * * *16
* * * *12 *19
45314313
*2353
**12 **
5314156
**13
**11 **
1145
38**
34253912
*1363
**NANA
329
125 *9
**7
** **106
30
3525326
*1459
*12 **
4012144
**12
**822
114
28**
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percentNA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 14 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Corn, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
3936418
111067
**15 **
52201612 **24
3175 *165
46 **
4417349
199
80
**133
572318152
15
61851
138
44 **
53455011
82160
**20 **
441911191
17
192033
121333
50343429
71361
113 **
623920253
31
82372
269
50 *
48253713
138
77
**NANA
522316141
10
7194
**148
49 **
45223610
171177
**143
552317162
16
81952
138
44 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 15 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Corn, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
4428414
217
59
**9
**
361096
**16
973
**124
34 **
3716276
306
73
**92
4513108
**9
12103
**95
34 **
3937388
51244
**10 **
27748
**9
1971196
17
50232718
79
56
29
**
48221114 **17
16133
**134
36 **
3722289
206
67
**NANA
371198
**7
1192
**106
36 **
3820296
257
67
**92
4212108
**10
13103
**95
32 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 16 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Cotton, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
* * * *
*
* * *
*
*
857044
**42
*
44 * * *18 *
11 *
**
*
* **
67536115
262038
1126
775814186522
334816598
4217
81796040
262774
19 *
1008350203738
1771 * * *1879 *
61575919
172548
3NANA
725312255315
2441145
14125714
69556116
262140
1126
785917186322
324815599
4416
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 17 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Cotton, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
* * * *
*
* * *
*
*
895654
*51
*
28 *
** *8 *
29 ** **
*
* **
61525511
321744
1146
714411176223
443713597
3917
65686136
163333
13 *
937211151817
4041 * * *1344 *
56585314
222152
3NANA
65468
245414
3436104
12115220
62535513
301844
1136
714511165822
443713697
3916
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 18 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Soybeans, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
4318405
**7
70
218
49181521 **22
5327 *3
179
53 **
4616377
**8
82
213 **
56181718 **14
4914 **
1131641 **
58405211
31354
214 **
39121111 **18
4521 **
29
1629
* * * *
*
* *
**
* *
*
*
48233911
17
78
3NANA
501814151
10
341611
131546 **
4820408
**9
76
214 **
53171617 **15
4816 **
1121639 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 19 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Soybeans, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
4615393
**5
62
59
42141111 **12
6114 *3
128
47 **
4014306
**5
76
29
**
48121111 **
9
619
** **101234 **
4934478
61050
310 **
33777
**13
5610 **
27
1123
* * * *
*
* * *
* *
*
*
4220318
*5
76
3NANA
42121010 **
8
48111
**111238 **
4116336
16
73
29
**
46121010 **
9
6110 ** **
91233 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 20 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
All Wheat, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
443444 *
**1777
19
52291617
21
*24 * *135
49
4427495
**2469
**22 **
4917145
**16
**151
**177
34
4032406
**1030
**8
**
21736
**8
19
** **
54
15 **
4432609
13460
**17 **
66242312 **21
**18 **
2191141 **
43304910
**2358
**NANA
4115127
**11
112 **
1149
33 *
4330496
**2356
**17 **
4616137
**15
**141
**147
31 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 21 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
All Wheat, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
523047 *
**7
66
10
3316109
12
*8
** *72
33
4020344
**2467
**12 **
401174
**10
**10 ** **115
23
2824293
**6
22
**7
**
13323
**5
74
** **
427
**
4228448
**2051
112 **
55171610 **16
*15 ** **176
35 **
3525338
**1853
**NANA
29965
**6
17
** **105
22 *
3623334
**1648
**10 **
31964
**9
38
** **
94
18 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 22 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Alfalfa Hay, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
308
334
**7
48
**3
341154
**9
**10 * *4
**19
165
103
**7
30
**3
**
24964
**8
**10 ** **
318
2011223
677
*9
308
**1
**5
*4
** ** ** **11
33102415
**1219
**4
**
37138729
**92372
19 **
238
178
18
33
1NANA
2695515
**91262
13 *
227
166
**8
28
**4
**
291075
**8
**101142
12 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 23 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Alfalfa Hay, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
377
343
**5
47
**5
26842
**8
**7 *
**4
**16
18492
**5
28
**2
**
23532
**5
**5
** **
315
188
174
366
*5
183
**2
**3
*2
** ** ** **
5
317
2111
**9
16
12
**
26754
**6
**5223
**11 **
216
135
16
30
1NANA
20443
**3
**611418 *
225
144
**5
27
**3
**
23643
**5
**5
** **
317
*** Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 24 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Other Hay, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
123
11 **
210
** **
4112
**1
** **
2 **
1
10 **
5 **
**6
** **
71
** ** ** **
** ** ** **
1 **
1
13392
** **
2
** **
81
**1
**1
** ** ** **
1 **
2
276
117
35
** **
18642
**5
**3
**53
**10 **
13371
**16
*NANA
6111 *1
**1
** **
311
13282
**14
** ** **
82
**1
**1
** ** ** **
1 **
2 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 25 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Other Hay, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
144
111
311
**2
5222
**2
** **
2 **
2
1115
**
17
** **
8 ** ** ** ** **
** ** ** **
1 **
1
9281
** **
1
** **
3 ** ** ** ** **
** ** ** **
1 ** **
205
103
34
** **
19332
**3
*4
**11
**7
**
12362
**16
*NANA
6111 *1
**1
** **
311
11271
** **
4
** ** **
6 ** ** ** ** **
** ** ** **
1 **
2 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 26 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Fruits and Nuts, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
9013463
** *6
*24 *
901913163
66
233
2041 **76 *
68 *26 *
* *
*
9967 *374956
61 * *80 *9641
68245234
**1
23 *
83552351 *44
39 *2321 *61 *
74364055
**93
**58
967523434756
**533019406
7816
79393439
243
4NANA
826215412740
14217143911727
73304444
**64
**126
926522433453
**472121368
7315
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 27 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Fruits and Nuts, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
8312512
* *8
*15 *
81199
104
59
173
1134 *65 *
80 *24 *
* *
*
9244 *102141
29 * *41 *6810
509
3011
*2
3 **
4716 **16 **14
9 **
28 *34 **
68314230
**53
**42
845114253047
**361618423
6210
69352519
145
4NANA
68354
161622
122108
265
494
64203720
**43
152
72369
191736
**248
11294
536
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 28 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
Vegetables, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
79625147
**3586
33 **
915825441051
*651914441076 *
31273824
*1984
31 *
776023171929
338
**151851 *
57445334
**1362
**274
733010343
32
331814191656 *
70725147
*3779
1034 *
856833408
41
**371115131660 *
74574847
32378
5NANA
805424381634
237199
3426722
61564940
42877
5322
815625359
38
**4013121916602
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 29 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
Vegetables, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
49433113
**2867
21 *
4721492
31
*25121
271940 **
1822156
*6
83
39 *
58174447
1732 *173
22 **
37313516
**1240
*123
3676
142
18
115388
32 *
71493732
**3757
136 *
71399
291116
*128
18271129 *
54483022
31564
5NANA
522313124
14
217114
3317412
39342815
101862
**275
52196
134
16
215165
189
302
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 30 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Acres Receiving Practice,
All Other Crops and Cropland Pasture, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Percent ofAcres
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
33233312
**3
40
11
382199 *20
**1910 *258
25
3923427
**1567
24 **
5121128
**17
22141
181237 **
46384420
**1240
211 **
38158
131
17
**201286
25 **
40243314
**1142
**131
472617182
19
**1846
117
38 **
45314115
11251
1NANA
431710122
14
11922
129
34 **
43314215
**1248
**15 **
431811121
18
12022
128
30 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 31 NASS, USDA
Pest Management Practices,Percent of Farms Utilizing Practice,
All Other Crops and Cropland Pasture, 1999
PracticeRegion United States
North-east
NorthCentral
South West 1998 1999
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Percent ofFarms
Prevention Practices:
Tillage/etc. to manage pests Remove or plow down crop residue Clean implements after fieldwork Water management practices
Avoidance Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to resist insects Adjust planting/harvesting dates Rotate crops to control pests Crop varieties genetically modified to be pathogen/nematode resistant Alternate planting locations Grow trap crop to control insects
Monitoring Practices:
Scouted for pests Records kept to track pests Field mapping of weed problems Soil analysis to detect pests Pheromones to monitor pests Weather monitoring
Suppression Practices:
Crop varieties genetically modified to be herbicide resistant Scouting used to make decisions Biological pesticides Beneficial organisms Physical barriers Adjust planting methods Alternate pesticides Pheromones to disrupt mating
31133214
*1
27
3
30712
**10
*8
13 *244
23
2612208
**8
39
10 **
30943
**7
17
** **106
16 **
3633357
**8
25
39
**
24536
**8
462196
15 **
33142110
28
26
191
34159
103
12
383585
212
3321239
16
36
1NANA
2674616
1721
108
18 **
3324308
27
29
29
**
27745
**8
3622
106
16 **
* Insufficient reports to publish data.** Less than 1 percent.NA Not applicable, question not asked that year.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 32 NASS, USDA
Survey Procedures: The estimates in this report are based on the Fall Agricultural Survey conducted in December1999. This probability survey used an area frame design with asample of 6,930 segments or parcels of land. Each segmentaverages approximately one square mile in size. Enumeratorsconducting the area survey contact all farmers having operationswithin the sampled segments and collect a variety of information,including pest management practices for their entire operation. Estimates are then calculated, using the selection probability ofeach segment.
Estimation Procedures: For each crop/pest management practice combination, two ratios are calculated:percent of farms and percent of acres covered by that practice. If a farm operator used a given practice on a specific crop, allacres planted to that crop were considered to have been “treated”with the given pest management practice.
These data will not be revised even if there are subsequentrevisions to acreage for a given crop.
Reliability : The probability nature of the survey provides estimates that are statistically representative ofpest management practices on the targeted crops. Reliability ofsurvey results is affected by sampling variability and non-sampling errors. The sampling variability, expressed as apercentage of the estimate, is referred to as the coefficient ofvariation (cv).
Sampling variability of the estimates differs considerably bycrop/pest management practice combination. Some practices areseldom used on certain crops. In general, the more common the pestmanagement practice, the smaller the sampling variability. Forcommonly used pest management practices, cv’s will range from 1-15percent at the U.S. level and 5-40 percent at the Regional level.
Non-sampling errors occur during a survey process, and unlikesampling variability, are difficult to measure. They may becaused by interviewers failing to follow instructions, poorlyworded questions, non-response, problematic survey procedures, ordata handling mistakes between collection and publication. Inthis survey, all survey procedures and analyses were carried outin a consistent and orderly manner to minimize the occurrence ofthese types of errors.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 33 NASS, USDA
Terms and Definitions
Agricultural chemicals : Active ingredients in fertilizers and pesticides.
Allelopathic: The release of chemical compounds from a plant that will inhibit the growth of another plant, such as weeds.
Beneficial Insects: Insects collected and introduced into locations because of their value in biologic control as preyon harmful insects and parasites.
Chemigation: Application of an agricultural chemical by injecting it into irrigation water.
Crop year: The period immediately following harvest for the previous crop through harvest of the current crop.
Cultivars: A horticulturally or agriculturally derived variety of a plant, as distinguished from a natural variety.
Farm: Any establishment from which $1,000 or more of agricultural products were sold or would normally be sold during the year. Government payments are included in sales. Places with all acreageenrolled in set aside or other government programs are consideredoperating.
Fungi: A lower form of parasitic plant life which often reduces crop production and/or lowers the grade quality of its host.
Land in Farms: All land operated as part of a farming operation during the year. It includes crop and livestock acreage,wasteland, woodland, pasture, land in summer fallow, idle cropland, andland enrolled in the Conservation Reserve Program and other set aside orcommodity acreage programs. It excludes public, industrial, and grazingassociation land and nonagricultural land. It excludes all landoperated by establishments not qualifying as farms.
Nematodes: Microscopic, worm-shaped parasitic animals. Damage to many crops can be severe.
Pesticides: As defined by the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), includes any substance or mixtureof substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling or miti-gating any pest, and any substance or mixture of substances intended foruse as a plant regulator, defoliant, or desiccant.
Pheromone: A chemical substance produced by an insect which serves as a stimulus to other individuals of the same species for oneor more behavioral responses.
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 34 NASS, USDA
SECTION K - PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
1. [ ENUMERATOR ACTION. ]
[ Were any crops planted or harvested, hay cut, or cropland pasture reported on total acres operated? ]
YES - [Continue.] NO - [Enter 3 in Code Box 463, and go to Section L.]
000Completion Code for
Section K Only1- Incomplete 4633- Valid Zero
COLUMNSIN TABLE
440
CROP CODES FOR ITEM 3
191 - Corn 26 - Soybeans 8 - Cotton 34 - Wheat
190 - Barley 1 - Alfalfa Hay 11 - Other Hay225 - Wild Hay
142 - All Vegetables312 - All Fruits & Nuts401 - All Other crops & Cropland Pasture
2. [List all crops grownduring the 1999 cropyear.] . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
COLUMN NUMBER
401 402 403 404 405
Crop
3. [Enter crop code for each crop.]Crop
Code441 441 441 441 441
Now I have some questions about pest management practices you may have used on this operation for any crops grownduring 1999. By pests, we mean weeds, insects and diseases. Were any of the following practices used on youroperation by you or anyone else?
4. Did you use any crop varieties that were genetically modified to be resistant to:
4a. specific herbicides (Roundup-Ready,Liberty-Link, Poast-Protected corn, STS soybean, IT-corn)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If YES, how many acres:443 443 443 443 443
• • • • •
4b. insects (Bt., etc.)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
444 444 444 444 444
• • • • •
4c. plant pathogens or nematodes causingplant diseases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
445 445 445 445 445
• • • • •
5. Was this crop scouted for pests(weeds, insects or disease) using asystematic method? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If YES, enter Code=1 for each crop446 446 446 446 446
6. Were electronic or written records keptto track the activity or numbers ofdifferent pests?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
447 447 447 447 447
7. Did you use scouting data and compare
it to university or extension guidelines
for infestation thresholds to determinewhen to take measures to control pests?
448 448 448 448 448
8. Did you use field mapping of previousweed problems to assist you in makingweed management decisions?. . . . . . . .
449 449 449 449 449
9. Did you use soil analysis to detect thepresence of soilborne pests orpathogens? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
450 450 450 450 450
10. Did you use beneficial organisms(insects, nematodes or fungi) tocontrol pests?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
453 453 453 453 453
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 35 NASS, USDA
SECTION K - PEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (continued)COLUMN NUMBER
401 402 403 404 405
Crop
11. Did you use pheromones to monitorpests by trapping?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
If YES, enter Code=1 for each crop481 481 481 481 481
12. Did you use pheromones to controlpests by disrupting mating?. . . . . . . . .
482 482 482 482 482
13. Did you use topically applied biologicalpesticides such as Bt (BacillusThuringienses), insect growthregulators, neem or other naturalproducts to control pests?. . . . . . . . . . .
452 452 452 452 452
14. Did you use water management practices, such as controlled drainageor irrigation scheduling, excludingchemigation, to control pests?. . . . . . . .
458 458 458 458 458
15. Did you remove or plow down cropresidues to control pests?. . . . . . . . . . .
456 456 456 456 456
16. Did you use practices such as tilling,mowing, burning, or chopping of fieldedges, lanes, ditches, roadways orfence lines to manage pests?. . . . . . . . .
455 455 455 455 455
17. Did you clean tillage or harvestingimplements after completing field work for the purpose of reducing thespread of weeds, diseases or otherpests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
457 457 457 457 457
18. Did you adjust planting or harvestingdates to control pests?. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
460 460 460 460 460
19. Did you choose planting locations toavoid cross infestation of insects ordisease? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
464 464 464 464 464
20. Did you rotate crops for the purpose ofcontrolling pests?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
462 462 462 462 462
21. Did you use weather monitoring topredict the need for pesticideapplication? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
480 480 480 480 480
22. Did you alternate pesticides to keeppests from becoming resistant topesticides (use pesticides withdifferent mechanisms of action)?. . . . .
461 461 461 461 461
23. Did you adjust row spacing, plantdensity or row direction to controlpests? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
459 459 459 459 459
24. Did you maintain ground covers,mulches or physical barriers to reducepest problems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
454 454 454 454 454
25. Did you grow a trap crop to helpcontrol insects? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
463 463 463 463 463
26. [Column completioncode]
1- Incomplete3- Valid Zero
401 402 403 404 405
442 442 442 442 442
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 36 NASS, USDA
Index
Page
Estimation Procedure s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Highlights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Number of Farms and Land in Farms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Pest Management Practices Barley . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Corn . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Cotton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 Soybeans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 All Whea t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 Alfalfa Ha y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 Other Ha y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Fruits and Nut s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 All Other Crops and Cropland Pasture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Planted and Harvested Acres for Selected Crops . . . . . . . . . . 8
Reliabilit y . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Report Feature s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Survey Instrumen t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
Survey Procedure s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
Terms and Definition s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary Agricultural Statistics BoardApril 2000 37 NASS, USDA
Released April 4, 2000, by the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), Agricultural StatisticsBoard, U.S. Department of Agriculture. For information on "Pest Management Practices 1999 Summary"call 202-690-1052, office hours 7:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. ET.
Report Features
Listed below are persons within the National Agricultural Statistics Service to contact for additionalinformation.
Ken A. Eriksen, Environmental Statistician (202) 690-1052
Norman W. Bennett, Head, Environmental and Demographics Section (202) 720-0684
Linda J. Hutton, Chief, Economic, Environmental and Demographics Branch (202) 720-5084
The next "Pest Management Practices Summary" report will be released April, 2001.
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs on thebasis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, andmarital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities whorequire alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.)should contact the USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD).
To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, WhittenBuilding, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410, or call 202-720-5964 (voiceor TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
ACCESS TO REPORTS!!
For your convenience, there are several ways to obtain NASS reports, data products, and services:
INTERNET ACCESS
All NASS reports are available free of charge on the worldwide Internet. For access, connect to the Internetand go to the NASS Home Page at: http://www.usda.gov/nass/. Select “Today’s Reports” or Publicationsand then Reports by Calendar or Publications and then Search, by Title or Subjetc.
E-MAIL SUBSCRIPTION
There are two options for subscribing via e-mail. All NASS reports are available by subscription free ofcharge direct to your e-mail address. 1) Starting with the NASS Home Page at http://www.usda.gov/nass/,click on Publications, then click on the Subscribe by E-mail button which takes you to the page describinge-mail delivery of reports. Finally, click on Go to the Subscription Page and follow the instructions. 2) Ifyou do NOT have Internet access, send an e-mail message to: [email protected]. In the body of the message type the word: list.
AUTOFAX ACCESS
NASSFax service is available for some reports from your fax machine. Please call 202-720-2000, using thehandset attached to your fax. Respond to the voice prompts. Document 0411 is a list of available reports.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PRINTED REPORTS OR DATA PRODUCTS
CALL OUR TOLL-FREE ORDER DESK: 800-999-6779 (U.S. and Canada)Other areas, please call 703-834-0125 FAX: 703-834-0110
(Visa, MasterCard, check, or money order acceptable for payment.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ASSISTANCE
For assistance with general agricultural statistics or further information about NASS or its products orservices, contact the Agricultural Statistics Hotline at 800-727-9540, 7:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ET, or e-mail:[email protected].