2 of 2 DOCUMENTS Analysis As of: Jun 20, 2013 No. 855. PETER LEMIEUX v. UNITED STATES AND SHAH BAH YAUST. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 273 U.S. 749; 47 S. Ct. 458; 71 L. Ed. 872; 1927 U.S. LEXIS 841 February 28, 1927. PRIOR HISTORY: [*1] Petition for writ of cer tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. COUNSEL: Mr . We bster Balli nger for pet iti one r. Solicit or Gener al Mitch ell, Assis tant Attorn ey Gener al Parmenter, and Mr. Nat M. Lacey for respondents. OPINION The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis denied for the reason that the Court, upon examinati on of the unpri nted record herei n submi tted, fi nds th at th er e is no gr ound upon whic h a wr it of certiorari can be issued, application for which is therefore hereb y also denie d. The costs already incu rred herei n by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody as provided in the order ofOctober 29, 1926. Page 1
