peter uwer *)
DESCRIPTION
LoopFest VII May, 2008, Buffalo. NLO Q C D corrections to WW + 1-jet production at hadron colliders. Peter Uwer *). Universität Karlsruhe. Work in collaboration with S.Dittmaier, S. Kallweit. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Peter Uwer*)
Universität Karlsruhe
*) Financed through Heisenberg fellowship and SFB-TR09
LoopFest VII May, 2008, Buffalo
NLO QCD corrections to WW + 1-jet production at hadron colliders
Work in collaboration with S.Dittmaier, S. Kallweit
Comparable results by [Campbell, Ellis, Zanderighi] and [Binoth, Guillet, Karg, Kauer, Sanguinetti]
![Page 2: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Contents
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Conclusion / Outlook
![Page 3: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
WW + 1-Jet ― Motivation
Why is WW + 1 Jet important ?
Precise understanding important for tests of the SM at high scale, i.e. electro-weak gauge-boson
coupling analysis
● Benchmark process for loop calculations ?
● Important background process
● Large fraction of WW with additional jet activity
No, not enough colored particles to be really difficult…(# diagrams, # divergencies, #exceptional regions,…)
![Page 4: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
WW + 1-Jet ― Motivation
● For 155 GeV < mh < 185 GeV, H WW is important channel
● For 130 GeV < mh < 190 GeV, Vector Boson Fusion (VBF) dominates over ggH as far as signal significance is concerned
Higgs search:
[Atlas ‘03]
![Page 5: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
WW + 1-Jet ― Motivation
NLO corrections for Higgs production via VBF known:
[Figy, Oleari, Zeppenfeld ‘03, Berger,Campbell ‘04]
Experimental Signature:
Background reactions:
WW + 2 Jets, WW + 1 Jet
If only leptonic decay of W´s and 1 Jet is demanded(improved signal significance)
Two forward tagging jets + “Higgs”
NLO corrections unknown
Top of the Les Houches list ‘07
[Han, Valencia, Willenbrock '92; Spira '98; Djouadi, Spira '00]- Total cross section- Differential distributions
[Mellado, Quayle, Wu, ’05,’07]
QCD uncertainty ~ 4%
![Page 6: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Leading-order results
Basic process:
3 x 4 = 12 different partonic channels
Different quark flavours + crossing
Diagrams for uu:
![Page 7: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Leading-order results
Some features:
● Jet algorithm required to render cross section finite Ellis-Soper-Algorithm, no recombination at LO
● Dependence on 2x2-“CKM” matrix cancels (unitarity)● Significance of individual channels due to PDF’s● “Large” residual scale dependance LHC: 12(30)% for change 2(5)
Tevatron: 25(75)% for change 2(5)
![Page 8: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Methods
![Page 9: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Next-to leading order corrections
Every piece is individually divergent,only in the combination a finite result is obtained
Standard procedure:
Dipole subtraction method
[Frixione,Kunszt,Signer ´95, Catani,Seymour ´96, Nason,Oleari 98, Phaf, Weinzierl, Catani,Dittmaier,Seymour, Trocsanyi ´02]
in all single-unresolved regionsWith:
![Page 10: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Real corrections
Generic amplitudes:
Crossing + non-diagonal 2x2 flavour structure:
136 different channels
Some book keeping required
Sample diagrams:
Two independent computer codes, based on:● Short analytic expressions, using spinor helicity methods● Madgraph [Stelzer, Long ‘94]
![Page 11: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Dipole subtraction method
Universal structure:
Generic form:Leading-order amplitudes
Vector in color space
Color charge operators,induce color correlation
Spin dependent part,induces spin correlation
universal
Example: 10 dipoles required
! !
![Page 12: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Dipole subtraction method — implementation
LO – amplitude, with colour information,
i.e. correlations
List of dipoles we want to calculate
0
1234
5
reduced kinematics,“tilde momenta” + Vij,k
Dipole di
![Page 13: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Dipole subtraction method — implementation
LO – amplitude, with colour information,
i.e. correlations
List of dipoles we want to calculate
0
1234
5
reduced kinematics,“tilde momenta” + Vij,k
Dipole di
![Page 14: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Virtual corrections
Sample diagrams
Again many different channels!
Further decomposition possible:
“bosonic corrections” “fermionic corrections”
![Page 15: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Virtual corrections
Issues:
● Scalar integrals
● How to derive the decomposition
Traditional approach: Passarino-Veltman reduction
Scalar integrals
Large expressions numerical implementation
Numerical stability and speed are important
?
![Page 16: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Reduction of tensor integrals — what we did…
Reduction à la Passarino-Veltman,with special reduction formulae in singular regions,
Five-point tensor integrals:
Four and lower-point tensor integrals:
● Apply 4-dimensional reduction scheme, 5-point tensor
integrals are reduced to 4-point tensor integrals
Based on the fact that in 4 dimension 5-point integrals can be reduced to 4 point integrals
No dangerous Gram determinants!
[Melrose ´65, v. Neerven, Vermaseren ‘84]
[Denner, Dittmaier ‘02]
Two independent computer codes based on:
- Feynarts 1.0 + Mathematica library + Fortran library- Feynarts 3.2 [Hahn ‘00] + FormCalc/LoopTools [Hahn, Perez-Victoria ’98]
![Page 17: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Checks of the NLO calculation
● Leading-order amplitudes checked with Madgraph
● Subtractions checked in singular regions
● Structure of UV singularities checked
● Structure of IR singularities checked
Most important:
● Two complete independent programs for all parts of the calculation, inparticular:
complete numerics done twice !
![Page 18: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Tuned comparison with other groups
Campbell, Ellis, Zanderighi (CEZ), JHEP 0712:056,2007
Binoth, Guillet, Karg, Kauer, Sanguinetti (in progress) (BGKKS)
Stefan Kallweit LL2008
impressive agreement !
![Page 19: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Results
![Page 20: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Results WW+1-Jet –– Tevatron[Dittmaier, Kallweit, Uwer ‘07]
Phys.Rev.Lett.100:062003,2008
…as it should be…
Note: shown results independent from the decay of the W´s
![Page 21: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Results WW + 1-Jet –– LHC[Dittmaier, Kallweit, Uwer ‘07]
Note: shown results independent from the decay of the W´s
Phys.Rev.Lett.100:062003,2008
scale dependence only improved after jet-veto !
![Page 22: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Distributions including decay (LHC)[Campbell, Ellis, Zanderighi, JHEP 0712:056,2007]
LO rescaled by appropriate K-factor
![Page 23: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Conclusions
[Gudrun Heinrich ]
● Our group: Two complete independent calculations
● In addition: perfect agreement with two other groups
● Scale dependence is improved (LHC jet-veto)
● Corrections are important
● NLO has only mild effect on the shape of distributions [CEZ]
![Page 24: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Outlook
● Further improvements possible (and underway…)
(remove redundancy, further tuning, except. momenta,…)
● Distributions
● Include leptonic decay of the W´s
● Apply tools to other processes
![Page 25: Peter Uwer *)](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062803/568146c2550346895db3fb03/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
The End