pfa study with jupiter
DESCRIPTION
PFA Study with Jupiter. Contents : 1. Introduction 2. GLD-PFA 3. Z->qqbar Study 4. Zh Study 5. Summary. FJPPL Meeting @ KEK September 29 th , 2006 Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo. Introduction. Most of the important physics processes to be studied in the ILC - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 1
PFA Study with Jupiter
Contents :1. Introduction2. GLD-PFA3. Z->qqbar Study4. Zh Study5. Summary
FJPPL Meeting @ KEKSeptember 29th, 2006
Tamaki Yoshioka ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 2
Introduction- Most of the important physics processes to be studied in the ILC experiment have multi-jets in the final state. → Jet energy resolution is the key in the ILC physics.
- The best energy resolution is obtained by reconstructing momenta of individual particles avoiding double counting among Trackers and Calorimeters.
- Charged particles (~60%) measured by Tracker.- Photons (~30%) by electromagnetic CAL (ECAL).- Neutral hadrons (~10%) by ECAL + hadron CAL (HCAL).
→ Particle Flow Algorithm (PFA)
- In this talk, general scheme and performance of the GLD-PFA, using the GEANT4-based full simulator (Jupiter), will be presented.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 3
Geometry in Jupiter
Muon Detector
Solenoid
Hadron Calorimeter (HCAL)
Electromagnetic Calorimeter (ECAL)
TPC
VTX, IT
Dodecagonal ShapeAs of August 06
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 4
229.8cm
349.4cm
299.8cm419.4cm
Readout Line =10cm
270cm
Endcap.InnerRadius=40cm
BarrelHD
BarrelEM
EndcapEM
EndcapHD
Barrel.InnerRadius=210cm
Barrel.HalfZ=280cm
210cm
280cm
Calorimeter Geometry in Jupiter
IP
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 5
Calorimeter Structure
ECALW/Scinti./Gap
3/2/1 (mm) x 33 layers
HCALFe/Scinti./Gap
20/5/1 (mm) x 46 layers
Absorber
Active Layer
Current cell size :2x2cm
Can be changed.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 6
GLD-PFA
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 7
Particle Flow Algorithm for GLD
Flow of GLD-PFA
1.Photon Finding 2.Charged Hadron Finding3.Neutral Hadron Finding4.Satellite Hits Finding *Satellite hits = calorimeter hit cell which does not belong
to a cluster core
Note : Monte-Carlo truth information is used for muonand neutrino.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 8
Photon Likelihood (Input)
trkdis velocity meanlay
Edep/nhits chi2
Photon
Other
- Five variables are selected to form the photon likelihood function.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 9
Photon Likelihood (Output)
- Cut position is set to be 0.7.
linear
log
PhotonOther
Photon
Other
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 10
Charged Hadron Finding- Basic Concept : Extrapolate the charged track and calculate a distance between a calorimeter hit cell and the extrapolated track. Connect the cell that in a certain tube radius (clustering).
Charged TrackCalorimeter input position
Hit Cellsdistance
ECAL
HCAL
- Tube radius for ECAL and HCAL can be changed separately.
- Calculate the distance for any track/calorimeter cell combination.
Extrapolated Track
Tube Radius
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 11
Neutral Hadron Likelihood (Input)- Four variables are selected to form the NHD likelihood function.
Neutral Hadron
Satellite Hits
velocity Edensity
Edep/nhits meanlayer
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 12
Neutral Hadron Likelihood (Output)
- Cut position is set to be 0.73.
linear
log
NeutralHadron
SatelliteHits
Neutral Hadron
Satellite Hits
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 13
Z -> qqbar
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 14
Z-pole Event Display
End View Side View
- 2cm x 2cm tile (GLD backup solution) is used in this study.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 15Next: 電子、陽電子衝突
e+
e-
Event Display
Yellow : Photon
Red, Green : Charged Hadron
Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron Z → qqbar @ 91.2GeV
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 16
Yellow : Photon
Red, Green : Charged Hadron
Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron
Event Display
Gamma Finding
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 17
Yellow : Photon
Red, Green : Charged Hadron
Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron
Event Display
Charged Hadron Finding
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 18
Yellow : Photon
Red, Green : Charged Hadron
Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron
Event Display
Satellite Hits Finding
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 19
Yellow : Photon
Red, Green : Charged Hadron
Black, Blue : Neutral Hadron
Event Display
Remaining : Neutral Hadron
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 20
cluster type e photon e chd e nhd Pphoton Pchd PnhdPhoton 93.6 1.88 18.5 87.21 3.57 7.53
CHD 2.44 85.8 12.8 1.31 93.8 3NHD 1.07 3.6 52.8 3.28 22.7 70.7
Satellite 2.86 8.74 15.8 10.20 63.9 24.8
Definition
Efficiency : exxx (total xx E in collected hits)/(true xxx total E in CAL)
Purity : Pxxx (total xxx E in a cluster)/(total E in a cluster)
xxx = Photon, CHD, NHD, Satellite
both e and P values are energy-weighted
Performance
- Energy-weighted Efficiency and Purity
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 21
- In barrel region, ILC goal of 30% has been achieved.- Performance in 0.7<|cosθ|<0.8 is too bad. → Already fixed.
All angle
- Z → uds @ 91.2GeV, new calorimeter geometry, 2cm x 2cm tile
Jet Energy Resolution
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 22
Energy Dependence- Energy dependence of jet energy resolution.
- Bad performance for higher energy.- Not so bad performance for < 100 GeV Jet.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 23
Linearity
- Good linearity. Jet energy can be corrected.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 24
Zh → h
First look at the Zh events with Jupiter and realistic PFA.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 25
Typical Event Display
- Two jets from Higgs can be seen.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 26
Zh → h @ 350GeV
- Jet energy is corrected by an empirical formula obtained by Z → qqbar studies.- Selection Criteria
- 90 < Evis < 200 GeV - pt >20 GeV/c
Higgs Mass Visible Energy
Missing Mass
- Fast MC• w/o correction• w/ correction
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 27
Kinematical Fit- 6 Measured Variables
Jet1 : Ej1, j1, j1
Jet2 : Ej2, j2, j2 (Note : Ej1 > Ej2)- 3 Unmeasured Variables
Z0 : Ez, z, z
- 4 Constraintspj1cosj1sinj1pj2cosj2sinj2pZcosZsinZpj1sinj1sinj1pj2sinj2sinj2pZsinZsinZpj1cosj1pj2cosj2pZcosZEj1 + Ej2 + Ez – Ecm = 0
(Note: jet mass is fixed : pfit = √{Efit2
– (Emeas2 – pmeas
2)} )
→ 1C-fit can be performed.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 28
Fitted Results
Prob > 0.02
- Higgs mass resolution is significantly improved. … But,- Peak at prob=1 indicates the fitting didn’t work well.
Very Preliminary
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 29
Stretch Functions
2,
2,
,,
ifitimeas
ifitimeas XX
• The stretch function should form a normal Gaussian if the X and are proper.
Too Narrow= Overestimated
Strange
Need tounderstand.
9/29/2006 FJPPL Meeting@KEK 30
Summary
• Realistic PFA has been developed using the GEANT-4 based full simulator of the GLD detector.
• Jet energy resolution is studied by using Z->qq events. ILC goal of 30% has been achieved for Z-pole events.
• ZH study based on current PFA performance is now ongoing.