pgcapp u6 – evaluation geraldine jones [email protected]

26
PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones [email protected]

Upload: hilary-joseph

Post on 13-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation

Geraldine [email protected]

Page 2: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Learning Outcomes

design an evaluation plan including formulating an appropriate research question. (LO1)

appreciate the pros and cons of a range of data collection methods (including survey, interview, moodle logs) and methods of analysis. (LO1)

identify and take account of the ethical issues that may arise from your proposed evaluation (LO1)

select relevant e-learning research literature to inform your practice in HE (LO2)

appreciate the affordances of a range of learning technologies, including a rationale for using a multimedia discourse facilitation tool, the Bath wiki and Moodle activities that support group work. (LO3)

Page 3: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Menu

Challenges of evaluating e-learning (5) Task - your projects – finding a focus for evaluation

(30) Definitions and purposes of evaluation (10) Task - your evaluation questions (10) BREAK Methods of data collection (10) Data analysis (5) Ethics – key concerns for U6 (5) Task – ethics scenario analysis (10) Spotlight on technologies for teaching (20) Next steps & Feedback (5)

Page 4: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

http://www.flickr.com/photos/86096256@N00/431703388

‘Learning technologies are not transparent, their processes not obvious and they do not broadcast their utility' (Salmon, 2005)

Page 5: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

“Without asking hard questions about learning, technology remains an unguided missile” (Ehrmann, 1996a)

http://www.flickr.com/photos/24656754@N00/3862379136

Page 6: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Messiness..

http://www.flickr.com/photos/80764244@N00/4113566073

It is difficult to separate a specific e-learning intervention from the complex interplay of cultural and social influences on the learning experience.

Page 7: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Task – I min plans

1 – Describe any plans you have for your e-learning activity to the whole group.

2 – In pairs or threes with similar designs/technologies or context discuss the following questions:

What outcomes are you seeking from your learning activity?

What do you really want to know? What aspects of the activity do you want to

evaluate?

Page 8: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Where is your focus?

pedagogical aims

learning and teaching processes

particular aspects of the learning environment.

technology itself,

the support surrounding the use of the technology.

Page 9: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

http://www.wordle.com

Page 10: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

A good evaluation will have explicit aims, address questions that are meaningful to these aims and to the intended audience, and use an appropriate mix of methods for gathering, analysing and presenting data

Page 11: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Purposes of evaluation

diagnostic – learning from the potential users; to inform plans to change practice;

formative - learning from the process; to inform practice;

summative - learning from the product; to inform others about practice.

Page 12: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Action Research

Page 13: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Action Research

Barrett and Whitehead (1985) ask six questions to help start an inquiry:

What is your concern? Why are you concerned? What do you think you could do about it? What kind of evidence could you collect to help you

make some judgement about what is happening? How would you collect such evidence? How would you check that your judgement about

what has happened is reasonable, fair and accurate?

Page 14: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Your question(s)

“If you don't have a question you don't know what to do (to observe or measure), if you do then that tells you how to design the study” (Draper, 1996)

Page 15: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Does it work? Do students like it?

Is easy to use ?

What is the nature of student engagement?

How does the effectiveness of the approach in learning gains compare with its efficiency in terms of teaching efforts (a form of cost-effectiveness) ?

How confident were female students in discussing their own ideas online compared to their male counterparts?

Page 16: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Task – think of a question(s)…

A few examples:

What do tutors/students think of the use of the wiki for a group work activity and what are the perceived benefits and limitations?

How has the forum discussion activity helped or hindered students achieve the learning outcomes (for the activity/unit)?

What impact has the role play activity had on student motivation?

How does an EVS supported activity promote deep learning? How does a ‘Moodle workshop’ mediated peer assessment

activity add or detract from the student learning experience? How has formative feedback been improved through the use

of a group project wiki? How and when do students use a self-test quiz activity to

support their learning on the unit?

Page 17: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Methods of Data Collection

Surveys – post/pre-task survey (prior experience/motivation) *

Focus group/individual interviews * VLE access logs * Reflective diaries * Observation and/or videotaping (e.g.Panopto) A learning test (quiz) Exam (assessment) performance

Recommended resource: Evaluation cookbookhttp://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook/contents.html

Page 18: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Example “recipe”

Project Aim: To develop on-line self assessment materials for Y1 UG Biology large enrolment class.

Evaluation purpose: To establish student use of and attitudes to on-line self assessment materials.

Methods: Access logs, post activity survey (all students), post exam focus group (6 students, refreshments provided)

Page 19: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Data analysis

Online surveys Word clouds

http://www.wordle.net/http://www.survey.bris.ac.uk/

Page 20: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Ethics is easy?

Do no harm Be open Be honest Be careful

Shank (2002) http://www.flickr.com/photos/61137578@N00/474514209

Page 21: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Task

Discuss the evaluation scenarios and identify any ethical issues that could arise.

Page 22: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Key concerns for U6

Tutors power over students possibly influencing disclosure.

What can be done to minimise this?

Informed consent

What would you include on a consent form?

Page 23: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

“satisfactorily completing an ethics form at the beginning of a study and/or obtaining ethics approval does not mean that ethical issues can be forgotten, rather ethical considerations should form an ongoing part of the research.”

Miller & Bell (2002)

Page 24: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Spotlight on technology

Mahara for your design briefs Voicethread - Multimedia discourse

facilitation tool Bath wiki Moodle wikis and forums

Page 25: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

Key dates

Get feedback on your draft design brief – submit by 12th Dec.

Participant presentations, get peer feedback & support – 5min presentations on 19th Jan (need to move to 26th Jan)

Review session – 16th Feb Final Submission - 22nd June

Page 26: PGCAPP U6 – Evaluation Geraldine Jones g.m.jones@bath.ac.uk

References

Cousin, G. (2009) Researching Learning in Higher Education. Oxon:Routledge

Miller, J. and Bell, L. (2002) Connecting to what? Issues of access, gatekeeping and “informed” consent, In M. Mauthner, M. Birch, J. Jessop and T. Miller (Eds.), Ethics in qualitative research. London:Sage

Oliver, M., Harvey, J., Connole, G. & Jones,A. (2007) Evaluation. In G. Connole & M. Oliver (Eds.) Contemporary Perspectives in E-learning Research. London:Routledge

Shank, G.D. (2002) Qualitative Research: a personal skills approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill Prentice Hall.