pgpr in plant disease management
DESCRIPTION
includes rhizoplane bact and phylloplane bact -whole mechanismTRANSCRIPT
11/04/2023
Department of PLANT PATHOLOGYCCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar
Welcome
Plant growth promoting bacteria and their role in disease management
INTRODUCTION
• PGPB includes Rhizoplane and Phylloplane bacteria.
Rhizoplane Bacteria:• “Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria”(PGPR).• Term PGPR was first used by Joseph W. Kloepper
and Schroth in the late 1970s.• PGPR are root colonizing (rhizosphere) bacteria
benificial to plants.• Rhizosphere is the region around roots having
high microbial activity.
• Term Rhizosphere was coined by German agronomist Hiltner in 1904.
• Rhizoplane The external surface of roots together with closely adhering soil particles and debris.
DIVERSITY AMONG PGPRS
Diazotrophic PGPRNitrogen Fixation is one of the most beneficial
processes performed by rhizobacteria.Rhizobacteria converts gaseous nitrogen (N2) to
ammonia (NH3) making it available to the host plant.Nitrogenase enzyme is involved in nitrogen fixation
and requires anaerobic conditions.Ex- Azospirillum, Bradyrhizobium, Rhizobium,
Serratia, Enterobacter , Burkholderia spp.
Bacillus 95% of Gram +ve soil bacilli belong to the genus
Bacillus. The remaining 5% are confirmed to be Arthrobacter
and Frankia. Members form endospores to survive under
adverse conditions.
Pseudomonas Pseudomonas is the most abundant gram –ve genus
in rhizosphere. The ecological diversity of this genus is enormous.
• Pseudomonas strains show high versatility in their metabolic activity.
• Antibiotics, siderophores, HCN are the metabolites released by these strains.
Taxonomy of PGPB Earlier bacterial taxonomy relied on phenotypic traits like cell and colony morphologies. Taxonomy revolutionized with the discovery of PCR
technique in 1983. The gene sequences of 16S subunit of rRNA are
used to compare similarities among strains. Nowadays characteristics of strains are studied
using FAME technique, Protein estimation by SDS-PAGE technique and MLEE.
Classification of PGPR
1. Plant part they occupy
Extracellular (e-PGPR, free living
Intracellular (i-PGPR, symbiotics)
On the basis of
Exist inside root cells.Forms root nodules.Ex- Rhizobium
Exist in rhizosphere,on rhizoplane, in intercellular spaces of root cortex.
2. Mechanism of Action
Direct PGPR
Indirect PGPR
Ex. Solubilization of nutrients, nitrogen fixation, production of growth regulators
Ex. Exclusion of pathogens,production of siderophores,lytic enzymes,ISR
Siderophore Production• Siderophores are high-affinity iron chelating
compounds secreted by microorganisms.• Siderophores chelate ferric ion with high affinity,
allowing its solubilization and extraction from most mineral or organic complexes.
• Bacterial siderophores classified into four main classes carboxylate, hydroxamates, phenol catecholates and pyoverdines.
Siderophore Organism Bacillibactin Bacillus subtilis Ornibactin Burkholderia cepacia Azotobactin Azotobacter vinelandii Pyoverdine Pseudomonas aeruginosa
pathogens
Microbial Antagonism
AntibioticsPGPR produces antibiotics
and act as antagonistic.Biocontrol based on
antibiosis secretion of molecules that kill target pathogen
Achieved through bacteriocins, antibiotics hydrolytic enzymes,HCN production, SAR, ISR.
Antibiosis ISR Competition
Pathogen
Sr.No
Antibiotic
Source Action against
1. Pyrrolnitrin P. Fluorescens BL915 strain
Prevent the damage of Rhizoctonia solani during damping-off of cotton plants
2. DAPG Pseudomonas spp.
Membrane damage to Pythium spp.
3. Phenazine Pseudomonas spp.
F. oxysporum, Gaeumannomyces graminis
4. Polymyxin, circulin and colistin
Bacillus spp. Pathogenic fungi
5. Zwittermicin A B. cereus UW85 strain
Bio-control of alfalfa damping off
Production of Phytohormones• Phytohormone production by PGPR was first
reported in 1940.• Auxin and Ethylene are more commonly produced
hormone, Cytokinin is less common.• Auxin promotes lateral root formation, cell division,
apical dominance etc.• Among PGPR species, Azospirillum is one of the best
studied IAA producers (Dobbelaere et al., 1999)
• Production of Gibberellins by PGPR is rare,• However two strains have been reported, Bacillus
pumilis and Bacillus licheniformis.
ROOTS WITHOUT PGPR ROOTS WITH PGPR
Bacteriocin
HCN producing rhizobacteria• HCN is a powerful inhibitor of metal enzymes, especially
cytochrome C oxidases. • HCN production is a common trait within the group
of Pseudomonas. • Include species of Alcaligenes, Bacillus,
Pseudomonas and Rhizobium.
Sr.No Bacteriocin PGPR
1. Pyocins P. pyogenes2. Cloacins Enterobacter cloacae3. Marcescins Serratia marcescens4. Megacins B. megaterium
• Strawberry fruits were harvested and transported to the laboratory.
• Dipped in a suspension of B. cinerea conidia and allowed to dry for 1 h.
• Then inoculated with bacterial suspensions. • Control fruits dipped in conidia, dried and dipped in
nutrient broth diluted with sterile distilled water, • Fruits were incubated for 4 days at 25°C, and then
observation was recorded.
Donmez et al., 2011
Donmez et al., 2011
Cont..
Result:• No significant differences between CD-8, MFD-4,
MFD-18, MFDÜ-1 and control• Highest percentage of gray mold infection (79.2%)
was observed in the control and• Lowest (20.8%) was in MFD-45, followed by MFD-
81 (25.0%) and T26 (37.5%). Conclusion: PGPB were effective in biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea on strawberry fruit.
Fixation of Atmospheric N2
• There are two types of biological fixation: symbiotic and non-symbiotic.• The first is the most important mechanism by which
most atmospheric N is fixed.• It is limited to legume plant species and various trees
and shrubs that form actinorrhizal roots with Frankia.
• Non-symbiotic N-fixing rhizospheric bacteria belongs to genera including Azoarcus, Azospirillum, and Pseudomonas
Most studied symbiotic bacteria are Rhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Sinorhizobium and Mesorhizobium
Induced Systemic Resistance• PGPR interact with plant in a restricted area but
response is extended to whole plant.• Salicylic acid, which plays a protective role in
acquired systemic resistance .• While acquired systemic resistance is induced upon
pathogen infection, induced systemic resistance can be stimulated by other agents, such as PGPB inoculants.
• Plants inoculated with the biocontrol PGPB, P. putida and Serratia marcescens were protected against the cucumber pathogen P. syringae pv. lachrymans. Bashan &Bashan., (2005)
Induced Systemic Resistance
• E. chrysanthemi produces two siderophores
Achromobactin ( iron limiting condition) Chrysobactin (severe iron deficiency)
The role of CB in induction of SAR has been studied in Arabidopsis- Erwinia chrysanthemi system.
Role of siderophore in induction of SAR
Fig: PR1 gene expression and SA production in Arabidopsis leaves following CB treatment (Dellagi et al., 2009).
Cont.
Production of Enzymes • Hydrolytic enzymes produced by some biocontrol PGPB
lyse specifically fungal cell walls, and thereby prevent phytopathogens from proliferating .
• Ex. Pseudomonas stutzeri produces chitinase that lyse cell wall of Fusarium solani.
• Another strategy is the hydrolysis of fungal products harmful to the plant.
• Ex.Cladosporium werneckii and B. cepacia can hydrolyze fusaric acid that causes severe damage to plants.
(Hillel, 2005)
111114
Lim et al., 1991
Lim et al., 1991
Cont..
Cont..
Competition and Displacement of Pathogens
• Competition for nutrients and suitable niches among pathogens and is another mechanism of biocontrol of some plant diseases.
• Ex- high inoculum level of Pseudomonas syringae protected pears against Botrytis cinerea and Penicillium expansum .
• Bacteria capable of multiplying on the leaf surface to form a large population can compete successfully with pathogens for these sites and often reduce disease.
PGPR Disease promoting traits
References
Pseudomonas fluorescens
IAA, HCN Jeon et al. (2003)
Pseudomonas fluorescens
IAA, Siderophore, Antifungal activity
Dey et al. (2004)
Bacillus subtilis Antifungal activity Cazorla et al. (2007)
Bradyrhizobium spp. IAA,Siderophore, HCN Wani et al. (2007a)
Azospirillum amazonense
IAA, Nitrogenase activity Elisete et al. (2008)
Rhizobium leguminosarum
IAA, Siderophores, HCN,Exopolysaccharides
Ahemad and Khan (2009a)
Pseudomonas, Bacillus
, IAA and Siderophores Wani et al. (2007e)
List of PGPRs
PHYLLOPLANE BACTERIA• Defined as populations that can
survive and multiply on the surface of plants.
• Also called as epiphytic bacteria.• survive in trichomes base,
substomatal chambers, hydathodes, and especially, in between the depressions along the junctions of adjacent epithelial cells.
• They utilize similar mechanism for controlling of pathogens like antibiosis, siderophore production etc.
Location of the epiphytotic PGPB in tomato
P. macerans P. macerans
B. pumilus B. pumilus
control control
Bacterial spot and early blight biocontrol by epiphytotic bacteria in tomato plants
Filho et al., 2010
Filho et al., 2010
Cont…
Conclusion
(I) Paenibacillus macerans and Bacillus pumilus epiphytic bacteria and benzalkonium chloride reduce Xanthomonas vesicatoria and Alternaria solani disease severity in tomato plants.
(II) Epiphytic bacteria are able to inhibit the growth of tested phytopathogens, and efficiently colonize the phylloplane of tomato plants.
Challenges with PGPB
Challenges in Selection and Characterizati
on of PGPB
Challenges in Commercializati
on of PGPB
Natural variation
Challenges in Field
Application of PGPB
Challenges in Selection and Characterization of PGPB
• Lack of proper selection and screening procedure thus most promising organisms aren’t identified.
• Effective strategies for initial selection and screening of PGPB isolates are required.
• Selection of PGPB with the potential to control soil-borne pathogens
• Selection based on traits known to be associated with PGPB such as root colonization, ACC deaminase activity, antibiotic and siderophore production.
Con… Natural variation Prediction how an organism will respond
when placed in the field (compared to the controlled environment of a laboratory.
lack of consistency and many variation in results that are obtained in field trials
PGPB bacteria will not live forever in a soil/leaves, there is need to re-inoculate seeds to bring back populations.
Challenges in Field Application of PGPB
CHALLENGE• Lack of consistent
performance in the field due to heterogeneity of abiotic and biotic factors.
REMEDY• Knowledge of factors
optimal concentration, timing and placement of inoculant, and of soil and crop management strategies
• concept of managing the rhizosphere/phyllosphere by manipulation of the host plant, substrates for PGPB, or through agronomic practices.
MANAGEMENT
KNOWLEDGE
CHALLENGELack of better formulations to ensure survival and activity in the field
• REMEDYApproaches include development of improved carriers and application technology
Cont…
Challenges in Commercialization of PGPB• Maintaining quality, stability, and efficacy of
the product. • Factors like shelf life, compatibility
considered while formulation development.• Non-target effects on other organisms
including toxigenicity, allergenicity, pathogenicity.
• Capitalization costs and potential markets must be considered in the decision to commercialize.
CONCLUSION• PGPB has dual role as plant
growth promotion and as bioagent.
• They control the plant pathogen in direct as well as indirect way.
• PGPB is available in nature but their screening is not easy.
• It is included in IDM strategy for controlling several plant pathogens.
11/04/2023 46
“Happiness and bacteria have one thing in common; they multiply by
dividing!”
THANK
YOU