ph.d. student ben niu supervisor: ass.prof. alexander a. shapiro ass. prof. wei yan
DESCRIPTION
Phase Identification and Saturation Determination in Carbon Dioxide Flooding of Water Flooded Chalk Using X-ray Computed Tomography. Ph.D. Student Ben Niu Supervisor: Ass.Prof. Alexander A. Shapiro Ass. Prof. Wei Yan Prof. Erling H. Stenby. Content. Introduction Aim of the study - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Phase Identification and Saturation Determination in Carbon Dioxide Flooding of Water Flooded Chalk
Using X-ray Computed Tomography
Ph.D. Student Ben NiuSupervisor: Ass.Prof. Alexander A. Shapiro
Ass. Prof. Wei Yan Prof. Erling H. Stenby
04/21/23 Ben Niu 2
• Introduction• Aim of the study• Experimental facilities• Experimental procedures• Experimental results• Conclusions• Future plan
Content
04/21/23 Ben Niu 304/21/23 Ben Niu 3
Introduction • CO2 flooding of oil reservoir can potentially enhance oil recovery
significantly. At the same time, 1/3~1/2 injected CO2 could be stored during this process.
• CO2 flooding is characterized by complex phase behavior and geochemical reactions
• CO2 flooding experiments were performed using CT (Computed
Tomography) scanning to determine multiphase in-situ saturations for further understanding the recovery mechanisms.
• This study is a part of the project ‘EOR through CO2 Utilization’ funded by
the Danish National Advanced Technology Foundation and DONG Energy
04/21/23 Ben Niu 404/21/23 Ben Niu 4
Aim of the Study• Long – term goal: Three phase flooding on chalk reservoir
samples at high P and T by using CT scanning, to obtain information on phase saturation.
• Flooding experiments with CT scanning in the literature– Two immiscible phases (many)– Two miscible phases (some)– Three-phase flooding at irreducible water saturation
(immobile water) at high P and T (several)– Three-phase flooding at high P and T (almost none)
• Short–term objectives: – Investigate if different phases could be identified
simultaneously– Find solutions for identifying the various phases in three
phase flooding
04/21/23 Ben Niu 5
Experimental Facilities CT Scanner
• Fourth generation Siemens SOMATOM scanner
• Three energy levels: 80kV, 120kV, 137kV
• X-ray computer tomography may provide information on density, porosity, mineralogy, hetergeneities, phase saturations……
04/21/23 Ben Niu 6
Experimental Facilities Core Holder
• Aluminium core holder (Max. 100bar) • Carbon fiber core holder (1000bar,150C)
Carbon fiber wrapped coreholder Shematic of experimental setup
04/21/23 Ben Niu 704/21/23 Ben Niu 7
Experimental Procedures
• Four core flooding experiments were carried out to investigate if different phases could be identified simultaneously.
• Fluids: • Isopar-L, n-decane • Distilled water• CO2
• Dopants needed to increase contrast of CT numbers • Gas and oil phases have similar densities at high pressure
experimental conditions (65bar-100bar); • Oil phase: Iodododecane (C12H25I), Water phase: potassium
iodide (KI), sodium tungstate dihydrate (Na2WO4·2H2O).
• Two energy levels, 80 kV( 250mA·s) and 120 kV (330mA·s) • Reduce the beam-hardening effects;• Protect the machine (the tube life of CT scanner).
04/21/23 Ben Niu 804/21/23 Ben Niu 8
Experimental ProceduresReference scans: dry core, core saturated with each fluid
100% Oil
Water flooding
Gas flooding
Oil at 1-Swi
Gas flooding
Water flooding
Gas flooding
No flooding Oil at 1-Swi
Flooding: inj. rate 0.1 cc/min, scanned at every 2mm
1st Exp. 3rd Exp.2nd Exp. 4th Exp.
Clean and dry the core
04/21/23 Ben Niu 9
1st Experiment Core Materials
Plug sample properties P and T Fluids and dopant
NameLength(mm)
Diameter (mm)
Porosity(%)
kwater
(md)P
(bar)T
(oC)Oil and dopant
(wt %)Water and dopant
(wt%)Gas
Core#1 44.00 25.69 35.50 0.32 65 15Isopar-L
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
7% Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#2 77.02 25.72 40.00 0.13 65 15Isopar-L without
dopant
Distilled water1 % Na2WO4·2H2O
3 % Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#3 37.93 25.82 25.74 0.16 65 15Isopar-L without
dopantDistilled water
5 % KICO2
Core#4 74.82 37.04 26.74 0.23 100 15n-decane,
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
3 % KICO2
• Perfrom CO2 flooding at residual oil saturation with doped water and doped oil.
100% Oil Wat. flooding Gas flooding
04/21/23 Ben Niu 10
1st Experiment Data Analysis
• CT number at different energy levels
04/21/23 Ben Niu 11
1st Experiment Data Analysis
• Sarutations are not corrected, negative saturation is calculated.
Before water
flooding
Water flooding
CO2 flooding
Oil in the core (cc) 7.9 3.1 1.7
Water in the core(cc) 0 4.8 1.4
Oil produced (cc) — 4.8 1.4
Water produced (cc) — — 3.4
Oil recovery 0 55% 18%
04/21/23 Ben Niu 12
1st Experiment Data Analysis
• Dopant is adsorbed at the inlet of the core.
CT and 3-D reconstruction images (120 kV) of a dry core after the experiment
04/21/23 Ben Niu 13
2nd Experiment Core Materials
Plug sample properties P and T Fluids and dopant
NameLength(mm)
Diameter (mm)
Porosity(%)
kwater
(md)P
(bar)T
(oC)Oil and dopant
(wt %)Water and dopant
(wt%)Gas
Core#1 44.00 25.69 35.50 0.32 65 15Isopar-L
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
7% Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#2 77.02 25.72 40.00 0.13 65 15Isopar-L without
dopant
Distilled water1 % Na2WO4·2H2O
3 % Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#3 37.93 25.82 25.74 0.16 65 15Isopar-L without
dopantDistilled water
5 % KICO2
Core#4 74.82 37.04 26.74 0.23 100 15n-decane,
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
3 % KICO2
• Test dopant (C12H25I) with various concentrations
No flooding
04/21/23 Ben Niu 14
2nd Experiment Data Analysis
Fig.7 CT number at different energy levels (Experiment 2)
• Three-phase can be treated as pseudo-two phase flooding.
04/21/23 Ben Niu 15
2nd Experiment Data Analysis
• Adsorption happens even at low concentration of dopant.
04/21/23 Ben Niu 16
3rd Experiment Core Materials
Plug sample properties P and T Fluids and dopant
NameLength(mm)
Diameter (mm)
Porosity(%)
kwater
(md)P
(bar)T
(oC)Oil and dopant
(wt %)Water and dopant
(wt%)Gas
Core#1 44.00 25.69 35.50 0.32 65 15Isopar-L
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
7% Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#2 77.02 25.72 40.00 0.13 65 15Isopar-L without
dopant
Distilled water1 % Na2WO4·2H2O
3 % Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#3 37.93 25.82 25.74 0.16 65 15Isopar-L without
dopantDistilled water
5 % KICO2
Core#4 74.82 37.04 26.74 0.23 100 15n-decane,
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
3 % KICO2
• Determine water saturation under three phases conditions
Oil at 1-Swi Gas flooding
04/21/23 Ben Niu 17
3rd Experiment Data analysis
• CT number at different energy levels
04/21/23 Ben Niu 18
3rd Experiment Data analysis
• Water saturations from mass balnce and CT scanning agree well
Original core At Swi CO2 Flooding
Isopar-Lin the core (cc)
0 4.5 –Water
In the core(cc)5.2 0.7 –
Isopar-L produced (cc) – – –
Water produced (cc) – 4.5 –
Water saturation
1.0 0.13 –Isopar-L
saturation0 0.87 –
04/21/23 Ben Niu 19
Challenges in Data Analysis
• In a homogenous chalk, the CT number of the pixels follows a normal distribution. The mean value and standard deviation obtained from different software are correct (FPImage and Image J).
CT number distribution in the region of interest of the dry core
04/21/23 Ben Niu 20
Challenges in Data Analysis
• Software Challenges:
1. Inhomogeneity of the core
• High density objects in the core, give high CT numbers
• Mean value and standard deviation are affected by the noise
04/21/23 Ben Niu 21
Challenges in Data Analysis2. Maximum CT number CTmax
• The maximum CT number is 3071, and any pixels with a higher value will be set to 3071.
• By using dopant, decent contrast of CT numbers can be obtained at 120kV. But CT numbers at 80kV may exceed the upper limit.
• Can we estimate the correct mean value if some of the CT values are higher than CTmax?
04/21/23 Ben Niu 22
Challenges in Data Analysis• An optimization method (nonlinear Huber estimation) is used to meet the
two challenges, correcting the CT number, thus avoid the influence from inhomogeneity of the core and compensate for overflow of CT values.
Challenge 1
04/21/23 Ben Niu 23
Challenges in Data Analysis• Optimization changes the mean value by 25 for Challenge 1 and 101 for Challenge 2 • ΔCT between oil and water is around 100
Challenge 2
04/21/23 Ben Niu 24
Challenges in Data Analysis
• An example for the corrected data at 80kV (3rd Experiment), in which ImageJ does not work well.
• Saturation calculated based on optimization is better than that from ImageJ. (Results form 120kV as reference)
• When oil and water both are doped, the accuracy of saturation calculation could be enhanced
04/21/23 Ben Niu 25
4th Experiment Core Materials
Plug sample properties P and T Fluids and dopant
NameLength(mm)
Diameter (mm)
Porosity(%)
kwater
(md)P
(bar)T
(oC)Oil and dopant
(wt %)Water and dopant
(wt%)Gas
Core#1 44.00 25.69 35.50 0.32 65 15Isopar-L
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
7% Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#2 77.02 25.72 40.00 0.13 65 15Isopar-L without
dopant
Distilled water1 % Na2WO4·2H2O
3 % Na2WO4·2H2OCO2
Core#3 37.93 25.82 25.74 0.16 65 15Isopar-L without
dopantDistilled water
5 % KICO2
Core#4 74.82 37.04 26.74 0.23 100 15n-decane,
5% IodododecaneDistilled water
3 % KICO2
• Identify three phases saturation with application of optimization method
Wat. flooding Gas floodingOil at 1-Swi
04/21/23 Ben Niu 26
4th Experiment Data analysis
• CT number at different energy levels
04/21/23 Ben Niu 27
4th Experiment Data analysis
• Three phase saturation and mass balance
Swi
conditionWater
floodingGas
flooding
Water in the core
(cc) 6.63 10.81 5.45
Oil in the core(cc) 14.92 10.74 5.08
CO2 in the core (cc) 0.00 0.00 11.02
Oil Recovery – 28% 38%
04/21/23 Ben Niu 28
4th Experiment Data analysis
• Calculation of three-phase saturatons1
1 11 1
1 1 1 113 3
2 2 2 2
2 2 2 2
1
1
wog wo w
g w g wg
o o w wog w
g w g w
CT CTCT CT
CT CT CT CTS
S CT CT CT CT
CT CT CT CT
A B
Subscripts o oilphase w water phase g gas phase wog three phases 1, 2 energy level 1, 2
• The CT numbers of different phases increase similarly when the energy level changes from 80 to 120 kV, making the coefficient matrix A3 ill-conditioned (the smallest determinant is 0.018) and calculated saturation extremely sensitive to CT numbers (1 unit error in CTo1 leads to a maximum deviation of 0.127 in the calculated So)
• If the entries in the second column of A3 have opposite signs, A3 can be well-conditioned. Possible dopant with Kedge between 120 kV and 80 kV could be the choice (rarely used).
04/21/23 Ben Niu 2904/21/23 Ben Niu 29
Conclusions• Comparison of the dry core images before and after
experiment is important to reveal the problem of dopant adsorption
• High pressure three-phase flooding can be visualized as pseudo two-phase, where the most interesting phase can be identified at a single energy level.
• CT numbers in a homogeneous chalk sample follow normal distribution at 80 kV and 120 kV. The nonlinear Huber estimation is a useful tool to correct the average CT number at 80 kV.
• The major reason for the failure in simultaneous determination of the three-phase saturations is the is ill-conditioned saturation equation.
04/21/23 Ben Niu 3004/21/23 Ben Niu 30
Future Plans
• The concept of ‘Pseudo two-phase’ flooding will be applied in the future experiments with the Danish chalk cores.
• More dopants, with suitable properties, will be tested under the two scanning energies.