phy 114 a general physics ii 11 am-12:15 pm tr olin 101

33
4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 1 PHY 114 A General Physics II 11 AM-12:15 PM TR Olin 101 Plan for Lecture 23 (Chapter 40-42): Some topics in Quantum Theory 1. Particle behaviors of electromagnetic waves 2. Wave behaviors of particles 3. Quantized energies

Upload: others

Post on 21-Oct-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 1

PHY 114 A General Physics II 11 AM-12:15 PM TR Olin 101

Plan for Lecture 23 (Chapter 40-42):

Some topics in Quantum Theory

1. Particle behaviors of electromagnetic waves

2. Wave behaviors of particles

3. Quantized energies

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 2

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 3

www.wfu.edu/physics/sps/spszone52012conf/welcome.html

Part of SPS zone 5 conference April 20-21, 2012

Offer 1 point extra credit for attendance*

*After the lecture, email me that you attended. In the following email exchange you will be asked to answer one question about the lecture.

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 4

Webassign hint:

NdN

md1 ,grooves/cm 4160For

sin

==

= λθ

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 5

Webassign hint:

λλθ == md sin2:spotbright for Condition

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 6

If you have not already done so – please reply to my email concerning your intentions regarding Exam 4.

The material you have learned up to now in PHY 113 & 114 was known in 1900 and is basically still true. Some details (such as at high energy, short times, etc. ) have been modified with Einstein’s theory of relativity, and with the development of quantum theory.

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 7

Which of the following technologies do not need quantum mechanics. A. X-ray diffraction B. Neutron diffraction C. Electron microscope D. MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) E. Lasers

Which of the following technologies do not need quantum mechanics. A. Scanning tunneling microscopy B. Atomic force microscopy C. Data storage devices D. Microwave ovens E. LED lighting

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 8

From Physical Review Letters March 20, 2000 -- Volume 84, Issue 12, pp. 2642-2645

Image of Si atoms on a nearly perfect surface at T=7 K.

Image made using atomic force microscopy.

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 9

Quantum physics –

Electromagnetic waves sometimes behave like particles

one “photon” has a quantum of energy E=hf

momentum p=h/λ=hf/c

Particles sometimes behave like waves “wavelength” of particle related to momentum:

λ=h/p

quantum particles can “tunnel” to places classically “forbidden”

Stationary quantum states have quantized energies

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 10

Classical physics

Wave equation for electric field in Maxwell’s equations (plane wave boundary conditions):

Equation for particle trajectory r(t) in conservative potential U(r) and total energy E

( )( )ctxkEtxx

ct

−=∂∂

=∂∂ sinˆ),( :examplefor max2

22

2

2

jEEE

( )

200

2

ˆ21)( :examplefor

21

tgtt

EUdtdm

kvrr

rr

−+=

=+

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 11

Particle properties Wave properties

Position as a function of time is known -- r(t) Particle is spatially confined when E≤U(r). Particles are independent.

Phonomenon is spread out over many positions at an instant of time. Notion of spatial confinement non-trivial. Interference effects.

Particle wave properties in classical physics

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 12

Mathematical representation of particle and wave behaviors.

Consider a superposition of periodic waves at t=0:

( )∑=i

i xkEtxE sin),( max

single wave (one value of k)

superposed wave (many values of k)

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 13

[ ] ( )2

max2 sin)0,(

∑=

ii xkExE

∆x

∆x

∆k = 10

∆k = 1

∆x ∆k ≈ 2π

∆x smaller more particle like

∆k smaller more wave like

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 14

∆x ∆k ≈ 2π Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle

khhp ===π2λ/π2/

λ

De Broglie’s particle moment – wavelength relation:

Heisenberg’s hypotheses: 2

≥∆∆ px

2

≥∆∆ Et

h = 6.6×10-34 Js = 4.14×10-15 eVs

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 15

Wave equations

Electromagnetic waves:

Matter waves: (Schrödinger equation)

2

22

2

2

xc

t ∂∂

=∂∂ EE

( ) ( )txxUxm

txt

i ,)(2

, 2

22

Ψ

+

∂∂

−=Ψ∂∂

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 16

Electromagnetic waves Matter waves

Vector – E or B fields Second order t dependence Examples:

Scalar – probability amplitude First order t dependence Examples:

( )

( )tkxc

EtxB

tkxEtxE

z

y

ωsin),(

ωsin),(

max

max

−=

−=/

0 )sin(),( iEtekxtx −Ψ=Ψ

Comparison of different wave equations

00

2

0

//

30

8

1),( 00

aeE

eea

tr tiEar

πε

π

−=

=Ψ −−

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 17

What is the meaning of the matter wave function Ψ(x,t)?

Ψ(x,t) is not directly measurable

|Ψ(x,t)|2 is measurable – represents the density of particles at position x at time t.

For a single particle system – represents the probability of measuring particle at position x at time t.

For many systems of interest, the wave function can be written in the form Ψ(x,t) = ψ(x)e-iEt/ |Ψ(x,t)|2 = | ψ(x)|2

1),( 2 =∫ Ψ∞

∞−dxtx

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 18

Wave-like properties of particles

Louis de Broglie suggested that a wavelength could be associated with a particle’s momentum

xi

xhihp

∂∂

−≡∂∂

−⇒= π2λ

“Wave” equation for particles – Schrödinger equation

( ) ( )txt

hitxxUxm

,π2

,)(2 2

22

Ψ∂∂

−=Ψ

+

∂∂

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

,,)(2

ψ, :ions wavefunctstate-Stationary

2

22

/

txEtxxUxm

et iEt

Ψ=Ψ

+

∂∂

=Ψ −

rr

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 19

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( )

2

or 2

2

2

sin

,,2

ψ, :0)( -- particle free -- Example

2

2

220

2

22

/

λλ

λπ

mhE

mEhk

mkE

(kx)eΨx,t Ψ

txEtxxm

etrU

-iEt/

iEt

==⇒=

=

=

Ψ=Ψ

∂∂

=Ψ= −

rr

Example: Suppose we want to create a beam of electrons (m=9.1x10-31kg) for diffraction with λ=1x10-10m. What is the energy E of the beam?

( )( ) 15010421010192

10662

1721031

234

2

2

eV J. mkg.

J.mhE -

-=×=

⋅×⋅

×==

λ

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 20

Electron microscope Typically E=120,000-200,000 eV for high resolution EM

From Microscopy Today article May 2009

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 21

Electrons in an infinite box:

( ) ( )

( )

3,2,1 πsinψψ

0for ψ2

ψ

0

2

22

=

=

≤≤

∂∂

−=

nL

xnx

Lxxxm

xE

mnEn 2

222π=

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 22

Electrons in a finite box:

finite probability of electron existing outside of classical region

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 23

Why would it be interesting to study electrons in a finite box?

A. It isn’t B. It is the mathematically most simple example of

quantum system C. Quantum well systems can be manufactured to

design new devices

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 24

Tunneling of electrons through a barrier

surface region

vacuum

tip

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 25

How a scanning tunneling microscope works:

Developed at IBM Zurich by Gerd Binnig and Heinrick Rohrer who received Nobel prize in 1986.

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 26

Visualization of | ψ(x)|2

A surface if a nearly perfect Si crystal

Physical Review Letters -- March 20, 2000 -- Volume 84, Issue 12, pp. 2642-2645

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 27

The physics of atoms –

Features are described by solutions to the matter wave equation – Schrödinger equation:

( ) ( )tUm

tt

i ,)(2

, 2

22

rrr

r Ψ

+

∂∂

−=Ψ∂∂

“reduced” mass of electron and proton

rZe

0

2

πε4−

( ) ( )

nm 0529.0πε4

eV 6.131πε8

:Solutions

ψ, :ions wavefunctstate-Stationary

2

20

0

2

2

200

22

/

==

−=−=

=Ψ −

mea

nZ

naeZE

et

n

iEt

rr

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 28

( )22 ψπ4 rr

Form of probability density for ground state (n = 1)

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 29

Angular degrees of freedom

-- since the force between the electron and nucleus depends only on distance and not on angle, angular momentum L ≡ r x p is conserved. Quantum numbers associated with angular momentum:

( ) ( )states 12 of total

1,....2,1,0 122

+≤≤−=−=+=

mmLn

z

L

Notation: dps ⇒⇒⇒= 2 ,1 ,0

s p

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 30

eV 6.13 2

2

nZEn −=

Summary of results for H-atom:

n = 1

n = 4 n = 3

n = 2

Balmer series

spectra

degeneracy associated with each n: 2n2

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 31

Atomic states of atoms throughout periodic table:

( ) ( )rrr

r ψ)(2

ψ 2

22

+

∂∂

−= Um

E

effective potential for an electron in atom

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 32

Example: Cu (Z=29) 1s22s22p63s23p63d104s1

s

p

d

4/19/2012 PHY 114 A Spring 2012 -- Lecture 23 33

( )22 ψπ4 rr