physical planning strategies of national high-technology industrial development zones in china
DESCRIPTION
Sisi Liang's presentation from thePenn Urban Doctoral SymposiumMay 13, 2011Co-sponsored with Penn’s Urban Studies program, this symposium celebrates the work of graduating urban-focused doctoral candidates. Graduates present and discuss their dissertation findings. Luncheon attended by the students, their families and their committees follows.TRANSCRIPT
Sisi LiangDepartment of City and Regional Planning, University of Pennsylvania
5.13.2011
Penn's 8th Annual Urban Doctoral Symposium
PHYSICAL PLANNING STRATEGIES of
NATIONAL HIGH-TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONES in
CHINA
America
2010s
1980s
Europe AsiaAustralia
1950s
UK Cambridge
Silicon Valley
France Sophia
Novosibirsk
Moscow State
Korea Daedeok
Australia ATP
JapanTsukuba
Sweden Finland
Belgium
SpainNetherland
RTP U.S.
Route 128 US
UK
India BangaloreSingapore
China
UK Cambridge
Silicon Valley
France Sophia
Novosibirsk
Moscow State
Korea Daedeok
Australia ATP
JapanTsukuba
Sweden Finland
Belgium
SpainNetherland
RTP U.S.
Route 128 US
UK
India BangaloreSingapore
China
High-Technology Industrial Development Zone (HIDZ),An Increasing Dominant Form
Close linkage with rapid urbanizationLarge Scale Site
Trend toward New Township or Science CityEconomic Contribution
Beijing Birdview Source: NASAWuhan Eastlake HIDZ in 1990sSuzhou Industrial Park in 2010
10% of China GDPAnnual Growth Rate 36.5%
In 2008, 663,000 jobs = 1.5 Silicon ValleyIn 2009, Total Area = 10 San Francisco
China’s High-Tech Zones
ARCHITECTURE
PLANNING STRATEGIES
L-S Development DistrictsCHINA AS BACKGROUND
CHINA’S PLANNING HIGH-TECH ZONES
Urban Design
US vs. ChinaComparative
Industrial Development
Districts
QUESTION:How and to what extent do planning and management strategies impact the outcomes of China’s High-Technology Industrial Development Zones?
MISSION,LAND USE
LOCATION
Mixed-use Oriented
Single Use (R&D) Oriented
Isolated
Integrated
TYPE 1 TYPE 2
TYPE 4 TYPE 3
13 HIDZse.g. Beijing, Chengdu, Xi’an
• Rich resources• Existing framework
8 HIDZse.g. Suzhou, Tianjin• Self-sufficient
• Newly planned framework
18 HIDZse.g. Shenzhen, Ningbo, Zibo•R&D Base•Isolated district
18 HIDZse.g. Shanghai, Wuhan, Qingdao•R&D industry domain•Based on small town
Criteria Selected Cases Planning Strategies Assess Dimensions
•Across Variations
•Across Types
•Plenty of Activities
•Exemplars
•Beijing ZGC Park
•Shanghai ZJ Park
•Suzhou SIP
•Shenzhen SHIP
•Planning System•Site Selection•Land Development•Infrastructure•Land Use•Transit Program•Open Space Design
•Effect on action and outcome
•Net Benefit: worth cost
•Internal Validity: Proper Mission
•External Validity: Social Impact
A Typology
Case Studies
TYPE 1: Beijing ZGC Park TYPE 2: Shanghai ZJ ParkMixed + IntegratedClusters of UniversitiesInnovation Center
Single-Use + IntegratedGovernmental Guidance
Innovation Base
PUDONG NEW AREALujiazui Financial Trade Zone
Zhangjiang High-Tech Park
TYPE 3: Suzhou Industrial Park TYPE 4: Shenzhen High-Tech Park
Sustainable Planning System: China and SingaporeMixed + Self-sufficient New TownshipTool for Attracting International Firms
Single-Use + IsolatedEconomic Anchor
Virtual University Park
South Sea
Toward HONG KONG
Toward Center
City
Residential Area
Nanshan District
Shenzhen University
Comparative Discussion
Type 1 Beijing
Type 2 Shanghai
Type 3 Suzhou
Type 4 Shenzhen
Management
Transit & Environment
Role of Planning
Nature of Plan
Address Local Contexts
Outcomes:
1. Diverse and sometimes competing purposes of national HIDZs;
2. Importance of adopting a sustainable strategy for development of HIDZs;
3. Versatility of planning approaches;4. A series of key factors that shape planning
strategies5. Suggestions for tailoring the approach to
planning to local resources and conditions
Next Steps
1. Publications(Journal Articles+ Book + Conferences)
2. Academic career in Tsinghua University
• Research on planning and management strategies in other development projects
• Practices of urban design projects