physical stability of spray dried solid dispersions of

29
PHYSICAL STABILITY OF SPRAY DRIED SOLID DISPERSIONS OF AMORPHOUS TOLFENAMIC ACID AND POLYVINYLPYRROLIDONE K-30 Pia Thybo The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences Copenhagen, Denmark

Upload: others

Post on 17-Mar-2022

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

PHYSICAL STABILITY OF SPRAY DRIED SOLID DISPERSIONS OF AMORPHOUS TOLFENAMIC ACID AND

POLYVINYLPYRROLIDONE K-30

Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Copenhagen, Denmark

GPEN October 2006 Side 2Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Outline of Today’s Presentation

Introduction

• Spray drying method

• Amorphous versus crystalline material

• Stabilization - solid dispersions

Specific study

• Tolfenamic acid

• Methods

• Results (stability, dissolution)

Summery

GPEN October 2006 Side 3Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Spray Drying

• Simple up-scaling. Unique ability to produce specific particle

size and volatile content regardless of dryer capacity

• Continuous reliable operation. Powder quality remains constant

throughout the dryer run time under constant operating

conditions

• Ability to handle heat sensitive, thermoplastic and/or

hygroscopic materials

GPEN October 2006 Side 4Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Spray Drying - Continued

•Ability to handle solutions, suspensions, emulsions, pastes or

melts

• Ability to handle materials under cGMP and aseptic drying

conditions

• Ability to handle hazardous substances i.e. flammable solvents,

dust explosion hazards, toxic materials

• Wide choice of spray dryer designs allows product

specifications to be met by tailoring the design

GPEN October 2006 Side 5Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Examples of Spray-Dryers

Laboratory scale Pilot scale Production scale

GPEN October 2006 Side 6Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Applications in the Pharmaceutical IndustryFormation of micro-particles

Inhalable products

• Particle size

• Particle size distribution

Micro encapsulation

• Controlled Release formulations

• Masking of a bad taste

Polymorphism

• Solubility/dissolution

GPEN October 2006 Side 7Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Key Elements in Spray Drying

Atomization

of liquid feed into a spray of droplets

Droplet-Gas Contact

mixing and flow pattern

Drying of Droplets

moisture / volatiles evaporation (~ 10 sec.)

Product Recovery

separation of particles from the gas

GPEN October 2006 Side 8Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Atomization

Rotary atomizer

Two-fluid nozzle

Co-current mode

Two-fluid nozzle

fountain mode

Pressure nozzle

GPEN October 2006 Side 9Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Droplet-Gas Contact

Ref.: Masters 2002

GPEN October 2006 Side 10Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Dry particle

Drying – From Droplet to Particle

time

Drying rate

Constant rate period (Saturated surface)

Falling rate period (liquid/vapour diffusion)

Heating up

Ref.: Masters 2002

Formation of surface

GPEN October 2006 Side 11Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Schematic picture of spray drying process

Feed

Heater

2 fluid nozzle

Feed flow Nozzle gas flow

Drying

chamber

Cyclone

Collection

vessel

Bag filter

Tin

(Tout)

Feed

flow rate

Nozzle gas

flow rate

Feed

concentration

Exhaust

air

GPEN October 2006 Side 12Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Effect of Spray Drying Parameters

Particle size

Feed concentration, Atomization ratio (Atom. gas flow

rate/Feed flow rate), Outlet temperature, Particle

morphology, Nozzle type

Volatile content

Outlet temperature, Drying gas flow rate (residence

time), Particle morphology, Particle size

Particle morphology

Solvent and carrier choice, Outlet temperature,

Formulation

Yield

Particle size, Volatile content, Particle Morphology

GPEN October 2006 Side 13Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Amorphous versus Crystalline- DefinitionCrystalline

…“the adjective, crystalline, implies an ideal crystal in

which the structural units, termed unit cells, are repeated

regularly and indefinitely in three dimensions in space”

Vippagunta et al, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 48, 2001

Amorphous

”Similar to a crystalline solid an amorphous solid may

have short-range molecular order, but unlike a crystalline

solid, an amorphous solid have no long-range order of

molecular packing”

L. Yu., Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 48, 2001

GPEN October 2006 Side 14Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Amorphous versus Crystalline

Positive

• Improved dissolution rate

• Bioavailability

Negative

• Stability

• More hygroscopic

GPEN October 2006 Side 15Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Physical Stability

• The glass transition temperature (Tg) is often used to

predict stability

• As a rule of thumb Hancock et al. (1995) proposed that

the Tg of a pharmaceutical product should be at least 50 ºC

above the storage temperature

• Stabilization approaches are often necessary for

amorphous pharmaceutical drugs

GPEN October 2006 Side 16Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Physical Stability – Moisture sorption• Absorbed water act as plasticizer, increasing molecular

mobility resulting in a reduced Tg

• Absorbed water can alter the hydrogen bonding between

molecules

Phase separation often accompanied with

re-crystallization

GPEN October 2006 Side 17Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Stabilization - Solid Dispersions

Several studies have shown the potential of high Tg

polymers to inhibit/retard re-crystallization of amorphous

drugs

Mechanisms

• Anti-plasticizing effect

• Interactions between drug and polymer

• Enchanged solubility

GPEN October 2006 Side 18Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Specific Study

GPEN October 2006 Side 19Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Purpose

To increase the dissolution rate of Tolfenamic acid through

manipulation of solid state properties

The intension is to produce small amorphous particles prepared

by spray drying method

Stabilization of this high-energy amorphous form by addition of

crystal growth inhibiting compounds

GPEN October 2006 Side 20Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

The Drug – Tolfenamic Acid

• NSAID

• White and yellow polymorph

(conformational – geometry of amino group)

Hydrogen bonded dimers in crystal

• Comparable solubility

Solubility in water: ~ 50 µg/ml

Solubility in ethanol: ~10 mg/ml

• Solutions of both modifications are

colourless and have identical physical

properties

Yellow polymorph

White polymorph

GPEN October 2006 Side 21Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Preliminary Experiments

Part 1: Composition of feed solution

• Screening of suitable excipients, primarily within the

water soluble polymers

• Selection of drug/polymer ratios

• Selection of solvent for feed solution

• Concentration

Choices:

• Formulation as solid dispersion with PVP as excipient

• Drug/polymer ratio: (1:1, 1:3, 1:5, 1:7)

• Ethanol as solvent

GPEN October 2006 Side 22Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Preliminary Experiments

Part 2: Optimization of the spray drying process

(process parameters)

Feed

Heater

2 fluid

nozzle

1 mm

Feed flow

Nozzle gas flow

Drying

chamb

er

Cyclone

Collection

vessel

Bag

filter

115 º C

20 g/min

6 kg/hr

16 g/L

Exhaust air

80 kg/hr

GPEN October 2006 Side 23Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Preparation & Characterization

Solution

Solid particles

Initial

characterization

TGAXRPD SEMDissolution

Stability

study

Spray drying

Drug content FTIR

GPEN October 2006 Side 24Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Dissolution

Time(min)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

% R

ele

ase

d

0

20

40

60

80

100

Spray dried TA

Physical mixture 1:1

SD 1:1

SD 1:3

SD 1:5

SD 1:7

TA as obtained from supplier

GPEN October 2006 Side 25Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Morphology, Crystallinity & Stabilization

2θ (degrees)

5 10 15 20 25 30

2θ (degrees)

5 10 15 20 25 30

2θ (degrees)

5 10 15 20 25 30 5 10 15 20 25 30

2θ (degrees)

SD 1:1 12 weeks SD 1:1 24 weeks

GPEN October 2006 Side 26Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Stability - Interaction

SD1:1 SD1:3 SD1:5 SD1:7

50.0 75.0 83.3 87.5

Weig

ht

loss

(%

)

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Measured

Additive prediction

TA starting material

Physical mixture 1:1

Molar excess PVP prediction

% PVP

Measured after 12 weeks

storage – equilibrium reached

GPEN October 2006 Side 27Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Main Conclusions from Study - Summery• Able to transform tolfenamic acid into its amorphous form

in solid dispersions

• All solid dispersions show higher dissolution rate when

compared to physical mixture and starting material

• The drug to polymer ratio is important from a stability

point of view

• Indication of intermolecular interaction in the solid

dispersions

GPEN October 2006 Side 28Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

More Interested……..

The presented data is included in a paper accepted for

publication in Pharmaceutical Development and Technology

(January 2007).

GPEN October 2006 Side 29Pia Thybo

The Danish University of Pharmaceutical Sciences

Acknowledgments

• Lars Hovgaard, DUPS (main supervisor)

• Flemming Hansen, University of Copenhagen (XRPD)

• Sandoz (financial support)

• Drug Research Academy (financial support)