physician leadership program: part ii assuring appropriate ... · the governance institute’s...
TRANSCRIPT
PAGE 1The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
Physician Leadership Program: Part II
Assuring Appropriate Physician Performance
New Credentialing & Privileging Challenges in the Era of Accountable Care
PAGE 2The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
3
Keeping the Public Safe
Credentialing may be the single most effective tool for assuring safe and high quality health care in a health care organization.
Outside of healthcare organizations that credential and perform professional practice evaluations, the patients are poorly protected from inadequate and/or inappropriate care.
4
Who is Responsible for Oversight of Credentialing and Peer Review in the Age of Accountable Care?
Historic Players: Hospital Board/Organized Medical Staff
Newer Players: Health System Boards & System Wide
Credentialing Bodies Employed Physician Groups Accountable Care Organizations/Clinically
Integrated Networks
PAGE 3The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
5
Credentialing is Becoming More Challenging and More Consequential
A Rising Flood of Lawsuits:
Negligent CredentialingCorporate NegligenceNegligent Oversight or Peer Review
6
Caught Between Scylla & Charybdis
Corporate Negligent Lawsuits • Negligent Credentialing• Negligent Peer Review
Suits from the Federal Government• False Claims Act• Fraud and Abuse/Stark
Legal action by staff: hostile workplace/sexual harassment
Lawsuits from Physicians• Breach of contract• Restraint of trade• Interference with business opportunity• Discrimination• Defamation• Injunctions and restraining orders
PAGE 4The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
7
8
Considerations at Initial Appointment or Employment
Do we need this practitioner? Consistent with our hospital medical staff development plan or group practice needs? Looking for privileges covered by an exclusive contract?Should we get an intended practice plan if applicant will be in private practice?Should we give membership without privileges or privileges without membership? Has this practitioner demonstrated compatibility with our member performance expectations (clinical and behavioral)?
How will we handle ‘red flags’?
PAGE 5The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
9
Case Scenario
Garner Health System has been looking for an endocrinologist for many years to fulfill an identified need. Its recruitment efforts have resulted in an application from Dr. Manson who would like to join Garner Medical Group and the medical staff of Garner Health System. The group practice recruitment committee has interviewed Dr. Manson and has recommended employment and extended him a contract. However, the medical staff credentials committee has noted several concerns with his application. These concerns include the following:
Dr. Mason had his license suspended for four years after several female patients complained of inappropriate physical exams. His license was recently reinstated after he completed a course on professional boundaries.
10
Several credentials committee members were concerned by Dr. Mason’s heavy involvement performing CME programs on behalf of pharmaceutical companies that produce diabetic medications.Also, several references submitted with his application suggested that his clinical care was less than stellar. These references were vague but the implication was clear.
PAGE 6The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
11
A Growing Physician Shortage Will Make Credentialing and Recruitment More Challenging
12
Newer Challenges Facing Hospital Credentialing Bodies:
• A growing numbers of “re-entering” doctors after practice hiatus
PAGE 7The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
13
Credentialing Concerns Regarding ‘Late Career Practitioners’
A New Focus of Credentialing Controversy
14
Why are Late Career Physicians A Concern?
• Demographic changes in the physician workforce
• A growing number of doctors working into their seventh, eighth, and ninth decades
PAGE 8The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
15
Michael DeBakey – Performed Surgery Into His mid-90s
16
Why are Late Career Physicians A Concern?• A high percentage of doctors plan poorly for retirement and
find it necessary to work longer than they would like
• A high percentage of late career physicians work part time and thereby becoming ‘low volume’ practitioners
• Evidence linking quality of care and patient safety concerns to late career practitioners
• Colleagues often reluctant to challenge the quality of a long-standing member of their medical community, either because they don’t want to tarnish their reputation at the end of their career or because they are influential and often in positions of seniority.
PAGE 9The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
17
18
Demographics of the Physician Workforce
• Approximately 1/3 of practicing physicians are 55 and older
• Approximately 40% of practicing physicians are 50 and older
• Only one in six general surgeons is younger than 40
PAGE 10The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
19
Aging Physician Population
AMA estimate of number of active physicians in 2020 by age: 65 years of age: 189,000 (18%) 55 years of age: 409,500 (39%)
20
A Growing Physician Shortage
• 18% of practicing physicians are planning to leave medicine in the next 5 years
• 36% of practicing physicians are planning to leave medicine in the next 10 years
• Projections suggest a shortage of as many as 100,000 physicians nationwide by 2020.
PAGE 11The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
21
Connection Between Age & Competence
Increased incidence of illness and:
• Cognitive impairment
• Sensory impairment
• Medication side effects
• Mood disorders
• Substance use disorders
Some research shows diminishing competence correlates with time elapsed from residency/fellowship
22
Annals Internal Med15 Feb 2005/Vol. 142 Issue 4 p 260
Systematic Review: The Relationship between Clinical Experience and Quality of Health Care
Background: Physicians with more experience are generally believed to have accumulated knowledge and skills during years in practice and therefore to deliver high-quality care. However, evidencesuggests that there is an inverse relationship between the number of years that a physician has been in practice and the quality of care that the physician provides.
PAGE 12The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
23
The Canadian Experience: Ontario
22% of physician over 75 years of age had gross deficiencies in their practice
16% in the 50-74 age group had deficiencies
9% of physicians under age 49 had deficiencies
(Journal of Medical Regulation, Vol. 99, No. 1: 10-18. 2013)
24
There is evidence to suggest that older physicians are less adaptable to rapid change in medicine and technology.
PAGE 13The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
25
26
Traditional Approaches to Competency Assessment of Older Practitioners
• Almost none for outpatient practitioners • Medical staff peer review for those holding medical
staff privileges• Focused assessments after poor care discovered:
ordered by medical staff or a licensing body• No proactive competency assessments unless
attempting to return to practice and reactivate a license. Most people are surprised to learn that medicine is not regulated to protect the public from aging practitioners. This is unlike other industries (e.g. pilots) or practice in some other countries (e.g. mandatory retirement ages for surgeons).
PAGE 14The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
27
Case Scenario
Dr Jasmine Joiner has been a fixture on the medical staff for more than 40 years. As a solo internist she has provided service to the hospital and unassigned patients without complaint or request for additional compensation. She has outlived her husband, her four adult children are successful in the community, she is on multiple community boards or associations and she has held most of the leadership positions on the medical staff over the course of her career. Now in her seventh decade, her practice is declining. She visits her office daily and attends very few inpatients. She is no longer on the ED call schedule as the result of the implementation of a hospitalist program that is now in its 10th year of successful implementation.
28
Case Scenario (cont.)
Dr. Joiner’s patient care statistics are as follows:2015 admissions -------------- 4ALOS --------------------------- 6Complications ---------------- 0Readmits within 30d -------- 1No patient complaints/no staff complaintsNo incident reportsNo peer review issues/ No mortalities/No documentation issues
Dr. Joiner’s reappointment is fast approaching. She has full critical care core privileges, including critical care. She has indicated that medicine is her life-long calling, her father practiced until he was 90, she expects to practice another ten years or so. She has reapplied for appointment and full privileges.
Dr. Joiner’s application has come before the Credentials Committee. How should it proceed?
PAGE 15The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
29
How Are Health Care Organizations Responding to a Growing Number of Late Career Doctors?
• Most are doing nothing
• Some medical staffs are adopting credentialing policies on ‘aging’ physicians and making bylaws changes to accommodate these policies
• Licensing boards are requiring competency assessments when older doctors try to reactivate a license
• Specialty societies are relying on MOC, although this has become a flashpoint of opposition from older doctors
30
2015 AMA Report: Assuring Safe and Effective Care for Patients by Senior/Late Career Physicians
“Physicians must develop guidelines/standards for monitoring and assessing both their own and their colleagues’ competency.”
“Formal guidelines on the timing and content of testing of competence may be appropriate and head off a call for mandatory retirement ages or imposition of guidelines by others.”
PAGE 16The Governance Institute’s Physician Leadership Training Program – Fairmont Scottsdale Princess
Scottsdale, ArizonaApril 17, 2016
31
What do ‘Aging’ Credentials Policies Typically Include?
• A target age for implementation – most typical choice is age seventy. Some policies have a mandatory retirement age.
• Reappointment criteria that include a cognitive screen and a ‘fitness for work’ physical exam
• Some policies provide for annual assessments after a certain age – both health assessments and FPPE
• Reiterate the MEC’s authority to request functional assessments and health evaluations
• Some employed physician groups (especially hospital owned) have adopted such policies under their personnel requirements
32
Additional Credentialing Challenges
• Telemedicine• Credentialing Non-Physician Practitioners• Using ‘Proctoring’ Effectively and Efficiently• Outpatient/Ambulatory Credentialing and Peer
Review