pida rolling-out the pap
DESCRIPTION
PIDA Rolling-Out the PAP. 17th UPDEA Congress, Tunisia. Dr. J. Moulot AfDB, dept. ONRI. Overview of Presentation. PAP-Energy Investment Cost : $40.3 bn. PAP vs. Regions and Project Types. Energy 15 items USD 40 bn. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
African Development Bank Group
AfDB
Interconnecting, integrating andtransforming a continent
Programme for InfrastructureDevelopment in Africa
Africa’s Time for ACTION
PIDARolling-Out the PAP
17th UPDEA Congress, Tunisia
Dr. J. MoulotAfDB, dept. ONRI
Overview of Presentation •PI
DA Priority Action Plan
1
•Projects synopsis
2
•Implementation Issues
32
3
PAP-Energy Investment Cost: $40.3 bnInga Hydro Phase 1 6,000ECCAS Central Central African Interconnection 10,500ECCAS
Great Millennium Renaissance Dam 8,000COMESA/ IGAD
Eastern
Batoka Dam 2,800COMESA EAC
Ruzizi III Dam 450COMESA EAC
Rusumo Falls Dam 360COMESA EAC
Uganda-Kenya Petroleum Products Pipeline 150COMESA EAC
North Africa Transmission 1,200AMU Northern
Nigeria -Algeria Pipeline N/A UMA ECOWAS Northern, Western
North South Power Transmission Corridor 6,000COMESA EAC SADC IGAD
Southern Nphamda -Nkuwa Dam 2,400SADC
Lesotho HWP Phase II -hydropower component 800SADC
Sambagalou Dam 300ECOWAS
Western West African Power Transmission Corridor 1,200ECOWAS
Kaleta Dam II 179ECOWAS
PAP vs. Regions and Project Types
4
Central41%
Eastern29%
Northern3%
Southern23%
Western4%
Cost in Million USDTotal:40.3 billion
Generation Transmission O&G Pipeline
Series1 21289 18900 150
2,500
7,500
12,500
17,500
22,500
TYPE PROJECTS
Mill
ion
USD
The energy infrastructure program focuses on major hydroelectric projects and interconnects the power pools to meet the forecast increase in demand. One regional petroleum products pipeline is also included.
PID
A Pr
iorit
y Ac
tion
Plan
202
0
Energy15 itemsUSD 40 bn
5
Overview of Presentation •PI
DA Priority Action Plan
1
•Projects synopsis
2
•Implementation Issues
36
GREAT MILLENNIUM RENAISSANCE DAM
Cost (Million USD) 8,000
REC Involved COMESA/IGAD
Beneficiary countries
Ethiopia, Nile Basin Countries
Technical Organizations
Ethiopian Electric Company / Nile Basin, EAPP
Objectives Develop a 5,250 MW plant
Expected Results increase capacity of EEPCO six-fold (750 MW at present) Supply Ethiopian and export EAPP market
Project Challenges
Capacity of EEPCO to O&M commercially and financially plant Mobilization of financing: Some US$ 3 billion are still needed Issuance of local bonds a challenge Coordinate Generation with development of complementary
transmission and distribution Consensus building with neighboring countries (Sudan, Egypt)
7
Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
NORTH SOUTH POWER TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR
Cost (Million USD) 6,000
REC Involved COMESA/EAC/SADC/IGAD
Beneficiary countries
Kenya, Ethiopia, Tanzania, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, Zimbabwe, South Africa
Technical Organizations
SAPP
Objectives Transport energy of Great Millennium Renaissance Dam
Expected Results 8,000 km line from Egypt through Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia ,
Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia, Zimbabwe to South Africa
Project Challenges
Cooperation/Agreements among participating countries No regional entity for Overall project development, operation and
Maintenance Establishment of Cross Regional SPV Inter-regional interconnection between EAPP and SAPP
8
Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
NPHAMDA – NKUWA HP-DAM
Cost (Million USD) 2,400
REC Involved SADC
Beneficiary countries
Mozambique, Zambezi basin
Technical Organizations
Mphanda Nkuwa Hydro-Electric Company, SAPP
Objectives Export on the SAPP market
Expected Results Hydroelectric power plant with a capacity of 1,500 MW
Project Challenges
Completion of financing plan Project structure needs to minimize risk profile and attract
commercial financing Negotiation of off-take agreements ( South-Africa: Local or Hard
currency?; Capacity of Energy off-take TOP contract?) High Currency Risks and hydrology risks
9
Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
LESOTHO HWP PHASE II - HYDROPOWER COMPONENT
Cost (Million USD) 2,400
REC Involved SADC
Beneficiary countries
Lesotho, South Africa, Orange-Senqu River Basin
Technical Organizations
Lesotho Highlands Water Commission, SAPP
ObjectivesIWRM to provide energy to Lesotho and water transfer to SA and ensures the water security of South Africa’s Gauteng province
Expected Results
Lesotho Highlands Water Project Phase II consists of two separate components – a) the construction of Polihali Dam and transfer to tunnel to Katse dam, and b) the Kobong pump storage scheme hydro-electricity scheme.
Project Challenges
Proposed 1,200 MW pumped storage component new challenge from Phase I
Financing for preparation of the pumped storage component Risks mitigation for the pumped storage component.
10Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
INGA- HYDROPOWER PHASE 1
Cost (Million USD) 6,000
REC Involved ECCAS
Beneficiary countries
DRC, Congo River Countries
Technical Organizations
CAPP
ObjectivesContribute to energy security and Increase energy trade between DRC, Zambia and South Africa as well as DRC and Congo River Countries
Expected Results To Develop 4,200 MW capacity run of river hydropower station on the Congo river with eight turbines
Project Challenges
Final structure for project development yet to be established Weak capacity of SNEL as developer Large financial package not sustainable by National interest alone Power Off-take yet to be agreed Political risk of DRC Minimizing contingent liability on GODRC’s balance sheet
11Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
CENTRAL AFRICAN INTERCONNECTION
Cost (Million USD) 10,500
REC Involved ECCAS
Beneficiary countries
South Africa, Angola, Gabon, Namibia, Ethiopia
Technical Organizations
CAPP
ObjectivesDevelop the transmission lines associated to the Inga Site (Inga 3 and Grand Inga)
Expected Results 3,800 km line from DRC to South Africa through Angola, Gabon, Namibia and to the North to Eq. Guinea, Cameroon and Chad
Project Challenges
• Coordinated development of generation and transmission• Close Coordination between GoDRC and Regional Organization Establishment of single entity SPV for development /operation of
Line Regional approach to reduce transit risks
12Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
SAMBAGALOU HP DAM
Cost (Million USD) 300
REC Involved ECOWAS
Beneficiary countries
Senegal, OMVG countries (Senegal, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Gambia)
Technical Organizations
EBID
Objectives To provide power to the OMVG Member States
Expected Results 128 MW of hydropower capacity, 930 km from the mouth of the Gambia River to supply Senegal, Guinea, Guinea Bissau and Gambia
Project Challenges
The project structure is still undecided. (PPP, IFI, Public Financing)
Financial sustainability of Dam unproven The role of Kaleta Dam in project structure uncertain The political support at OMVG and WAPP level is strong; Country political commitment of the countries changing over time
13Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
WEST AFRICAN POWER TRANSMISSION CORRIDOR
Cost (Million USD) 1,200
REC Involved ECOWAS
Beneficiary countries
Guinea,Guinea Bissau, Gambia, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Côte d’ivoire, Ghana
Technical Organizations
WAPP, OMVS
ObjectivesEnsure transmission between the countries and transport regional energy to ECOWAS countries
Expected Results 2,000 km line along the coast connecting with the existing Ghana Nigeria line with a capacity of 1,000 MW
Project Challenges
Coordination between WAPP, OMVS and the Governments The lack of a single point of responsibility creditworthiness of the power sector in Guinea Bissau, Guinea
and The Gambia not established Establishment of single entity SPV for development /operation of
Line Link sufficient generation capacities in Guinea and Cote d’Ivoire
14
Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
NORTH AFRICA TRANSMISSION
Cost (Million USD) 1,200
REC Involved UMA
Beneficiary countries
Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt
Technical Organizations
COMELEC
ObjectivesEnsure transmission between the countries and transport regional energy to UMA countries
Expected Results 2,700 km line from Morocco to Egypt through Algeria, Tunisia and Libya
Project Challenges
Clarify role of COMELEC and the Governments Establish Trade frameworks and develop Agreements for the
exchanges Regional versus National power market development advantages
15
Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
BATOKA GORGE HP DAM
Cost (Million USD) 2800
REC Involved COMESA/EAC
Beneficiary countries
Zambia/Zimbabwe Zambezi basin
Technical Organizations
EAPP/ Zambesi River Authority
ObjectivesTo increase generation capacity and reduce reliance on electricity imports and improve generation mix
Expected Results construction of a 181 meter gravity dam; installation of 800 MW (4 x 200 MW units) for both Zimbabwe and Zambia. Transmission lines
Project Challenges
Mandate of Zambesi River Authority (ZRA) to raise financing or implement capital projects
Special Purpose Vehicle to raise financing and implement the project yet to be created
Poor Creditworthiness of participating utilities, ZESA and ZESCO Zimbabwe government classification with IFIs as defaulting
16Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
RUZZIZI III
Cost (Million USD) 450
REC Involved COMESA/EAC
Beneficiary countries
Rwanda/DRC
Technical Organizations
CEPGL, EGL
ObjectivesShare power between Rwanda, Burundi and DRC promoted by CEPGL and develop local renewable energy as well as regulation of water basin
Expected Results Hydroelectric plant with a capacity of 145 MW
Project Challenges
Resources limitation of EGL for needs of the project The studies were launched to review the interconnection of South
Kivu and North Kivu and their interface with the CEPGL interconnected network.
Finalization of Establishment of a Basin Authority, necessary Finalized selection of preferered investors for PPP
17Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
RUSUMO FALLS
Cost (Million USD) 360
REC Involved COMESA/EAC
Beneficiary countries
Nile River Basin Countries
Technical Organizations
NELSAP
ObjectivesProvide inexpensive electricity and improve energy security in the region
Expected Results
• dam and hydro-electric power station of about 61 MW on the Kagera River at Rusumo Falls;
• Power lines connecting the power plant to the electricity grids of Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania.
Project Challenges
• Power sharing agreement between Burundi, Rwanda and Tanzania
• Environmental issues related to flooding (could affect wetlands downstream, including in the Akagera National Park)
Reservoir have a negligible effect on net evaporation
18Issues: Updated Status of Project; Roles of Utility, RECs and Power Pool
Overview of Presentation
•PIDA Priority Action Plan1
•Projects synopsis2
•Implementation Issues319
Roles of Utilities and Power Pools
Projects Fiches
- Update- Package- Fill gaps (physical and soft)
Commitments and Needs
- Capacity needs- Reforms needs- Project Preparation
Funding + Actions
- Tariffs- Creditworthiness- Maintenance and Operation
Influencing, Making Commitments , Acting together…
A time for action
MERCIOBRIGADOTHANK YOU
شكرا21