Pilot Project

IEC Materials forChild Friendly City

Endah Sri RejekiINDONESIA

Outline of Presentation:Background Stakeholders MatrixProblem TreeObjective TreeAlternative AnalysisLFA MatrixMonitoring and Evaluation

BACKGROUND• Social problems of child in

Indonesia have notably increased• Ministry of Woman Empowerment

and Child Protection has developed Child Friendly City (CFC) since 2006

• CFC is considered as solution to provide a better space for children

• However, after 4 years implementation only few cities and districts implement CFC• Society in general does not know about the policy

• Children’s views about how a child friendly city or district looks like are also mostly not yet heard in the process of developing the CFC

• Mechanism is not yet well established• The issue of the child’s participation is less

popular among the authorities and communities in general

• This pilot project proposes IEC material about children’s opinions on a place which is child friendly

Stakeholder MatrixStakeholders Beneficiary Decision

MakerCommunity

Leader Potential Opponent

Funding Agency

ImplementingAgency

Central Government X X X

Provincial governmentX X

City governmentX X

Sub-district government

X X

Government of Kelurahan Pejompongan

X X

Related government at central level X

Children in cities and districts + families X

Community members X X

School + TeachersX

Religious leaders X X X

Children’s group in Kelurahan Pejompongan

X X X

Care Providers X X

Problem Tree

Development plan does not fit with children needs

Mechanism to integrate children’s views in

development is not yet well established

Children’s voices are not taken into account by the decision makers

Children less confident in providing their voices

Increased social problems of the child in community

Children participation is not considered as important

aspect in development by the authorities

Community, parents and teachers less support child participation in

daily activities

Authorities, in specific, and community, in general, have

less awareness on the importance of child participation issue

Authorities and community have less

knowledge about child participation issue

Objective Analysis

City plan development fit with the children needs

Mechanism to integrate children’s views in

development is better developed

Children’s voices are taken into account by the decision makers

Children develop confidence and

strengthen self-esteem, identity and sense of

pride

Decreased social problems of the child in community

Children participation is considered as important aspect in development

by the authorities

Community, parents and teachers support child participation in daily

activities

Authorities, in specific, and community, in general, aware

on the importance of child participation issue

Authorities and community gain more knowledge about

child participation issue

Alternatives Analysis

Mechanism to integrate children’s views in

development is better developed

Children develop confidence and strengthen self-esteem, identity and sense of pride

Children participation is considered as important

aspect in development by the government

Community, parents and teachers support child participation in daily

activities

Authorities, in specific, and community, in general,

aware on the importance of child participation issue

Authorities and community gain more knowledge

about child participation issue

City plan development fit with the children needs

Children’s voices are taken into account by the decision makers

Decreased social problems of the child in community

Develop IEC Materials Develop Child’s confidence and self-esteem

Develop mechanism

Narrative Summary Verifiable Indicators Sources of Verification Important AssumptionsOverall GoalCity plan development fit with the children’s needs

By year 5, the CFC development in city of Central Jakarta fit with children’s need

Report from local authorities of Kelurahans, sub districts and yearly community survey

The pilot project is replicated to the other Kelurahan in Central Jakarta

Project PurposeChildren’s voices are taken into account by decision makers

The local government in the project area consider children’s views on child friendly place in developing CFC program

Record of local government (Kelurahan Pejompongan) in involving children’s group in meetings of CFC development in their area

1. Less resistance of authorities and community on child participation

2. Local government in project area continue to use material as references and involve children’s group in the process of CFC development

Outputs1.Authorities, in specific, and community, in general, aware on the importance of child participation issue

2.Children develop confidence and strengthen self-esteem, identity and sense of pride

Number of booklets about children’s view on child friendly place received by the local authorities (at province, city, sub-district, and kelurahan level)

20 children join the activities on drawing, making poems, pictures, and taking photos

Record of local government s on booklets they receive

Attendance records of children in kelurahan Pejompongan in the activities

1. Budget to print the IEC materials is covered by national budget

2. Number of children in Kelurahan Pejompongan are available to do the activities

PROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK

Narrative Summary Verifiable Indicators

Sources of Verification

Important Assumptions

Activities:1.Organize a meeting with local government of kelurahan Pejompongan2. Organize a meeting with children to discuss the design of activities and the timeline3.Organize activity on drawing, making poems and pictures4.Organize activity on taking photos in spots they like and don’t like, and making the reasons5.Design and distribute IEC material on children’s views about child friendly city in kelurahan Pejompongan to local authorities (province, city, sub-district, and kelurahan)

Inputs

Budget:National budget

Experts5 experts from Ministry of Women Empowerment and Child Protection and CBOs

Staffs5 staffs are available to help

Policy on CFCEmpowerment and Child Protection and CBOs

Children in Kelurahan Pejompongan who will participate in the activities can be identified

Pre-conditionsThe local government is willing

MONITORING AND EVALUATIONMonitoring Evaluation

Who? Project Personnel External

When? Ongoing, during the duration of the project

Mid termProject CompletionYears after project completion

Why? Check indicators and assumptionsMake changesUpdate plans as necessary

Identify lessons to be learned to use for future projectsProvide accountability

Link to Logframe

InputsActivitiesOutputs

OutputsProject PurposeOverall Goal

Monitoring Questions

 Specific questions of monitoring:Is the local authority of Kelurahan Pejompongan

willing to consider children’s opinion on child friendly place as its concern in developing CFC?

Are the children, in Kelurahan Pejompongan who will participate in the activities, identified?

Are the children in Kelurahan Pejompongan available to do the activities?

How many children participate in the activities?

Specific questions of monitoring (continue..):

Is IEC material on children’s opinion about child friendly place available?

Is the IEC material on children’s opinion about child friendly place able to raise awareness of the local government of Kelurahan Pejompongan on the importance of child’s participation in development process?

Do the activities (drawing picture, making poems, and taking photos) that are printed into IEC materials make the children of Kelurahan Pejompongan feel more confident, and strengthen self-esteem, identity and sense of pride?

Generic Monitoring Questions:Overall effectiveness and management Is the project providing benefit as planned? Is the project well managed? Is the project still relevant and feasible? Is the project consistent with current priorities? Is the project still relevant to the target group? Are the project objectives being achieved? Are the results being delivered? Are the results of good quality? Does the target group find the result relevant? 

Generic Monitoring Questions (continue…):Is the project well managed? Are the inputs being provided on time and within budget? Are the activities being implemented on time?

Is verification information being collected and made available? Are plans and budgets being updated? Is the project sustainable? How will the project be financially sustainable in the future? Are the technique being used available in the future? Are skills being transferred, and is the institution being

strengthened? What is the plan for funding after financial assistance ends? What is the plan for management after technical assistance ends?

Evaluation QuestionsSpecific questions for evaluation:Is budget allocation to print the IEC material covered

by national budget?Are children in Kelurahan Pejompongan available to do

the activities?Is the IEC material on children’s opinion about child

friendly place able to raise awareness of the local government of Kelurahan Pejompongan on the importance of child’s participation in development process?

Do the activities (drawing picture, making poems, and taking photos) that are printed into IEC materials make the children of Kelurahan Pejompongan more confident, and strengthen self-esteem, identity and sense of pride?

Specific questions for evaluation (continue…):Is there any resistance of authorities and

communities on child participation issue?Does the local government of Kelurahan

Pejompongan continue to use IEC material as references on developing CFC and involving children in the process of development?

Are children’s voices being heard in the process of development?

Is the pilot project replicated to the other Kelurahan in Central Jakarta and at the provincial level?

Does the city plan development of Central Jakarta fit with the children’s needs?

Generic Evaluation QuestionsRelevance Was the project appropriate for addressing the identified problems? Efficiency Were the results achieved at a reasonable cost? Effectiveness Did the result contribute to achieving the project purpose? Did the target group benefit? Impact What was the project’s effect to the overall goal? Sustainability Will the benefit continue after the project period?