pinal partnership government relations committee

17
Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee February 16, 2016

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jan-2022

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Pinal Partnership

Government Relations Committee

February 16, 2016

Page 2: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

6 things we’ve done right- or -

“why we’re not California”

Page 3: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

We know we’re in an arid state.

Page 4: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee
Page 5: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Our system has built in resiliency.

Greater Phoenix Water Sources

CAP

41%

Ground

Water

30%

Effluent

2%

Salt-Verde

27%

Source: Arizona Dept. of Water Resources

Page 6: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

0

200,000

400,000

600,000

800,000

1,000,000

1,200,000

1,400,000

1,600,000

Acre

Fe

et

Indian

Priority

326 KAF

M&I Priority

448 KAF

NIA Priority 222 KAF

Ag Pool 157 KAF

Ag Pool Shortage 143

KAF

Other Excess Shortage

32

0,0

00

Priority 3 - 68 KAF

CA

P D

eli

ve

ry P

rio

rity

Lo

wH

igh

Excess

Long-Term Contracts

We have a plan for CAP shortage impacts.

Tier 1 Shortage; Projected 2017 Orders

Source: Central Arizona Project

Page 7: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

We’re into banking.

CAP Deliveries by Type 1985 -

2011 CAP & AWBA: 3.7 MAF ( > 2x total annual deliveries)

SRP: > 1 MAF

Total Water Banked: > 9 MAF

Page 8: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Demand for water is changing.

Page 9: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Arizona’s Water Management Story

0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

5.5

6.5

7.5

8.5

9.5

10.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

220

240

260

1957 1973 1980 1990 2000 2010 2013

Mil

lio

n (

acr

e-f

ee

t o

r p

eo

ple

)

$ B

illi

on

AZ Water Demand & Growth (1957 – 2013)

Adjusted Gross Domestic Income Population Water Use (Acre-Feet)Source: Arizona Dept. of Water Resources

Page 10: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

what we should be worried about

Page 11: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Lake Mead Elevation

Lower Basin Structural

Deficit

Page 12: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Adjudication Areas

General Stream Adjudications

Gila Adjudication • Est. 1974• 24,000 parties• 78,000 claims• > $100,000,000 for lawyers

Little Colorado Adjudication • Est. 1978• 5,000 parties• 14,000 claims

Massive Water Rights Uncertainty

Adjudication Areas

Page 13: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Conflict Over Rural Groundwater Issues

Page 14: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Water for Projected Growth

Page 15: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

How will this work forPinal County?

ADWR’s Planning Areas

Page 16: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Projected Demands Basin & Range AMAs

30 – 40% increase in demand

mostly municipal

Source: ADWR Strategic Vision

Page 17: Pinal Partnership Government Relations Committee

Sarah Porter

[email protected]

602-496-0586