pink for girls, blue for boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/b1...predicting...

15
Pink for Girls, Blue for Boys: The Impact of Parental Gender- stereotypes on Child Preferences A/Prof Alina Morawska, Dr Sabine Baker, Stacy Siqi Zheng Parenting and Family Support Centre

Upload: others

Post on 04-Aug-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Pink for Girls, Blue for Boys:The Impact of Parental Gender-stereotypes on Child Preferences

A/Prof Alina Morawska, Dr Sabine Baker,Stacy Siqi Zheng

Parenting and Family Support Centre

Page 2: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Direct reinforcement on child behaviourfrom the parents

Indirect behaviouralmodelling from the

parents

Parents holding gender-stereotypical attitudesdirectly towards child behaviour itself

Indirect parental influence through

their attitudes about marital roles

Introduction – Research

Child Preferences –

Gender Stereotypes

Social Learning Theory

(Bandura & Walters, 1969; Bussey & Bandura, 1999; Cooper & Fazio, 1984; Endendijk et al., 2013, 2018; Festinger and Carlsmith, 1959; Friedman et al., 2007; Gerull and Rapee, 2002; Groeneveld and Mesman, 2018; Halpern & Perry-Jenkins, 2016; Jilani et al., 2018; Perry & Bussey, 1979; Skinner, 1938)

Interplay of parental attitudes and behaviour?Cognitive Dissonance?

Direct – operant conditioning

Indirect – observational learning

Page 3: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Introduction – Hypotheses

Attitudes Behaviour

Parental Attitudes

Marital Roles

Reinforcement

Modelling

Child Preferences

Hypothesis 1: Parental attitudes, marital roles, reinforcement and modelling could be predicting child preferences. (more gender-stereotypical parents = moregender-stereotypical preferences in children)

Hypothesis 2: Interrelationship between attitudes and behaviour. (congruent = moregender-stereotypical preferences; incongruent = less gender-stereotypical preferences in children)

Page 4: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Method - Participants

• 378 Australian parents

• with at least 1 children aged 1-5 years old

• Age: 20 – 65 years old

• 87% mothers

• 72% QLDers

• 89% Caucasians

• 66% University degree and above

• 76% employed

Page 5: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Method - Recruitment

Emails/Posts

Flyers Website Survey

Page 6: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

IVs

Parental attitudes about child behaviour

Parental attitudes towards marital roles

Parental reinforcement of child behaviour

Parental modelling

DV Child Preferences

Cross-sectional Design

Method - Design

Page 7: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Method - Measures

Child PreferencesPre-School Activities Inventory (PSAI; Golombok& Rust, 1993)

Parental AttitudesChild Gender Socialisation Scale(CGSS; Blakemore & Hill, 2008)

Marital RolesGender-based Attitudes toward Marital Roles Scales (GATMR; Hoffman & Kloska, 1995)

ReinforcementParent Reinforcement of

Gender Roles (PRGRC; Antill, Cunningham, & Cotton, 2003)

ModellingHousehold and Child Care Task Checklist (HCCTC; Spry, Morawska, & Sanders, 2009)

Page 8: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Results - Correlations

Marital roles, reinforcement, modelling & Child Preferences Sig. Negative correlations

Page 9: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Results - Regression

Hierarchical Multiple Regression

• Controls (not sig.) - F ch.(3, 374) = .65, p = .581

• Parent gender, education level, economic status

• 4 IVs: F (4, 370) = 9.84, p < .001 – 10% variance

• Sig. negative predictors of child preferences:

• Reinforcement (β = -.21, p < .001) – 4%

• Marital roles (β = -.17, p = .002) – >2%

• Not sig. predictors:

• Modelling (β = -.02, p = .784)

• Parental attitudes (β = -.06, p = .204)

Moderated Multiple Regression

• Direct effects of marital roles &

reinforcement

• Sig. 9% of the variance in child preferences

• F ch.(2, 375) = 18.40, p < .001

• Interaction: not significant predictor

• F (1, 374) = .01, p = .925

• No sig. interaction between marital roles &

reinforcement

• β = -.01, p = .925

Page 10: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Discussion – Hypothesis 1

• Inconsistent - No significant relationship between parental attitudes and child preferences

• Potential explanation: adaption made in CGSS

• Original – evaluation rating

• Now – likelihood rating

• Interpreted with caution!

• Stronger gender stereotypes in marital roles, reinforcement & modelling

• More gender-stereotypical preferences in children

• Social Learning Theory

Page 11: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

• Possible alternative explanations:

1. Explicit and implicit attitudes not differentiated in these measures• Having a discrepancy between implicit and explicit attitudes

= weaker attitudes overall (Karpen, Jia & Rydell, 2012) • Explicit attitudes are more prone to social desirability or consciousness

(Endendijk et al., 2013) • Solution: use separate measures specifically testing explicit & implicit

attitudes

2. Did not take the partners role in the household into account • Gender development is partly affected by childrens tendencies to

imitate same-gender models more than opposite-gender ones (Endendijk et al., 2018; Loureiro, Sanz- De-Galdeano, & Vuri, 2010; MacPhee & Prendergast, 2019)

• Daughters might imitate mothers behaviour more, sons might imitate fathers more (Perry & Bussey, 1979)

• Solution: conduct interviews with both parents about their child

Discussion – Hypothesis 2

• Marital roles & reinforcement intercorrelated as expected.

• Non-significant interaction found in predicting child preferences.

Page 12: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Strengths: • Further empirical

evidence

• Validated measurements with moderate to good reliability

• Relatively big sample size with strong power

Limitations: • Did not examine how

demographics influence parental

attitudes and behaviour

• Not representative sample –

educated, employed Caucasian

QLDers, mostly mothers

Discussion

Page 13: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

ImplicationsParents need to be more careful about expressing opinions that confirm traditional gender-stereotypes and to be more aware of their own behaviour in the household

Future research

The development or improvement of parenting interventions: start early by targeting young children and their parents

Page 14: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

ReferenceAntill, J. K., Cunningham, J. D., & Cotton, S. (2003). Gender-role Attitudes in Middle Childhood: In What Ways Do Parents Influence Their Children? Australian Journal of Psychology, 55(3), 148-153. doi:10.1080/0004953042000298602. Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). QuickStats. In 2016 Census. Retrieved from https://quickstats.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2016/qui kstat/036?opendocument Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1969). Social learning and personality development: London: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Blakemore, J. E. O., & Hill, C. A. (2008). The Child Gender Socialization Scale: A Measure to Compare Traditional and Feminist Parents. Sex Roles, 58(3), 192-207. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9333-y. Blommaert, L., van Tubergen, F., & Coenders, M. (2012). Implicit and explicit interethnic attitudes and ethnic discrimination in hiring. Social Science Research, 41(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.09.007 Bradbard, M. R., Martin, C. L., Endsley, R. C., & Halverson, C. F. (1986). Influence of sex stereotypes on children's exploration and memory: A competence versus performance distinction. Developmental Psychology, 22(4), 481-486. doi:10.1037/0012 1649.22.4.481 Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social Cognitive Theory of Gender Development and Differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 676-713. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.106.4.676. Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 229– 262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Endendijk, J., Groeneveld, J., Berkel, M., Hallers-Haalboom, G., Mesman, S., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, R. (2013). Gender Stereotypes in the Family Context: Mothers, Fathers, and Siblings. Sex Roles, 68(9), 577-590. doi:10.1007/s11199 013-0265-4. Endendijk, J., Groeneveld, M., & Mesman, J. (2018). The Gendered Family Process Model: An Integrative Framework of Gender in the Family. The Official Publication of the International Academy of Sex Research, 47(4), 877-904. doi:10.1007/s10508-018- 1185-8. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203-210. http://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593 Friedman, C. K., Leaper, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2007). Do mothers’ gender-related attitudes or comments predict young children’s gender beliefs? Parenting: Science and Practice, 7, 357–366. https://doi. org/10.1080/15295190701665656. Gerull, F. C., & Rapee, R. M. (2002). Mother knows best: effects of maternal modelling on the acquisition of fear and avoidance behaviour in toddlers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40(3), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(01)00013-4 Golombok, S., & Rust, J. (1993). The Pre-School Activities Inventory: A standardized assessment of gender role in children. Psychological Assessment, 5(2), 131. Halpern, H., & Perry-Jenkins, P. (2016). Parents’ Gender Ideology and Gendered Behavior as Predictors of Children’s Gender-Role Attitudes: A Longitudinal Exploration. Sex Roles, 74(11), 527-542. doi:10.1007/s11199-015-0539-0. Hoffman, L. W., & Kloska, D. D. (1995). Parents' gender-based attitudes toward marital roles and child rearing: Development and validation of new measures. Sex Roles, 32(5), 273-295. doi:10.1007/bf01544598. Jilani, Hannah S., Pohlabeln, Hermann, Buchecker, Kirsten, Gwozdz, Wencke, De Henauw, Stefaan, Eiben, Gabriele, ... Hebestreit, Antje. (2018). Association between parental consumer attitudes with their children's sensory taste preferences as well as their food choice. PLoS ONE, 13(8), e0200413. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200413 Karpen, S. C., Jia, L., & Rydell, R. J. (2012). Discrepancies between implicit and explicit attitude measures as an indicator of attitude strength. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 24–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.849 Loureiro, M. L., Sanz-De-Galdeano, A., & Vuri, D. (2010). Smoking Habits: Like Father, Like Son, Like Mother, Like Daughter?*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 72(6), 717-743. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2010.00603.x MacPhee, D., & Prendergast, S. (2019). Room for improvement: Girls’ and boys’ home environments are still gendered. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 80(5-6), 332-346. doi:10.1007/s11199-018-0936-2 Mesman, J., & Groeneveld, M. G. (2017). Gendered parenting in early childhood: Subtle but unmistakable if you know where to look. Child Development Perspectives, No Pagination Specified-No Pagination Specified. doi:10.1111/cdep.12250 Monteith, L., & Pettit, J. (2011). Implicit and explicit stigmatizing attitudes and stereotypes about depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 30(5), 484–505. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2011.30.5.484 Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1699 1712.https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1699 Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eich- stedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000078.Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of organisms: An experimental analysis. New York: Appleton-Century. Spry, C., Morawska, A., & Sanders, M. R. (2009). Household and Baby Care Task Checklist. Brisbane: Parenting and Family Support Centre; University of Queensland. Weinraub, M., Pritchard Clemens, L., Sockloff, A., Ethridge, T., Gracely, E., & Myers, B. (1984). The development of sex role stereotypes in the third year: Relationships to gender labeling, gender identity, sex-typed toy preference, and family characteristics. Child Development, 55, 1493–1503. doi:10.1111/1467- 8624.ep7303030.

Page 15: Pink for Girls, Blue for Boyshelpingfamilieschange.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/B1...predicting child preferences. (moregender-stereotypical parents = more gender-stereotypical preferences

Thank You !