Pipeline Evaluation Compendium

California Health Professions Consortium

&

UCLA HCOE

Background

• CHPC• Evaluation Committee

– Lourdes Rivera, Andrew Alvarado, Hy Doyle– Kathy Flores, Sandra Daley, Sebastian

Uijtdehaage– Kevin Barnett

Evaluation Compendium Steps I

• To Improve Pipeline Programs and Outcomes• To gather techniques, approaches and

experiences• To share evaluation tools and ideas• To provoke discussion and interaction

Important Studies

Impact of the University of California, Los Angeles/Charles R. Drew University Medical Education Program on Medical Students’ intentions to practice in underserved areas

• Ko M, Edelstein RA, Heslin KC, Rajagopalan S, Wilkerson L, Colburn L,Grumbach K.

• Acad Med. 2005 Sept; 80(9): 803-808.

Important Studies

The role of medical education in reducing health care disparities: the first ten years of the UCLA/Drew medical education program

• Ko M, Heslin KC, Edelstein RA, Grumbach K.

• JGIM. 2007; 22: 625-631.

Important Studies

• Student body racial and ethnic composition and diversity-related outcomes in US medical schools.

• Saha S, Guiton G, Wimmers P, Wilkerson L.

• JAMA. 2008 Sept 10; 300(10): 1135-1145.

Important Studies

Effectiveness of University of California postbaccalaureate premedical programs in increasing medical school matriculation for minority and disadvantaged students.

• Grumbach K, Chen E.• JAMA. 2006 Sept 6; 296(9): 1079-1085.

Important Studies

• The Stanford Medical Youth Science Program: 18 years of a biomedical program for low-income high school students.

• Winkleby MA.

• Acad Med. 2007 Feb 7; 82(2): 139-145.

Test Committee Ideas

Lourdes Rivera found Interest from Publisher at NEA

Presentations to validate ideas and gather feedback: California Health Professions Consortium, Association of American Medical Colleges, American Evaluation Association, Bureau of the Health Professions HRSA

Create a Compendium?

• Place to gather evaluation ideas, techniques, and experiences

• Plan to share within CHPC and beyond.

Authors Involved

• E. Wilson, A. Alvarado, S. Uijtdehaage and K. Grumbach

• G. Sanchez, T. Nevarez, W. Schink, D. Hayes-Bautista

• S. Uijtdehaage, H. Doyle, R. Richter, M. Vermillion

Authors Involved

• Invited– M. Nivet-AAMC Diversity– J. Lanphear, M.Matte-Northern Ontario School of

Medicine

• To be ?– C. Alexander, UCLA and NAMME– M.A. Winkleby, Stanford University

Compendium Evaluation Model

• Cycle– Needs Analysis– Program Planning– Program Implementation and Monitoring– Tracking and Program Outcomes

• ‘A’ model not ‘The’ model

Evaluation Compendium Steps 2

• In your hands is a current compendium.– It will change

• We’d like to include description of other CHPC Program-tried evaluation tools and experience.

• Submit, we’ll vet for inclusion

Compendium Roll-Out

• CHPC Quarterly Meeting

• UC PRIME Council

• AAMC Committee on Diversity Affairs

• National Association of Minority Medical Educators Annual Meeting

• PRIME Statewide-annual meeting

• AAMC National RIME/GDI Workshop

Evaluation Compendium Steps 2

• Cycle– Assess, Plan, Implement, Measure

• Structure can serve as basis for– Grant Proposals– Research Presentations– Poster Presentations– Published Papers

Compendium Currently

• Need to gather information about additional programs.

• After doing compendium needs assessment, planning, and on-going implementation---– NEED TO GATHER OUTCOMES