PLAN REVIEW MEETING

TEAM ANIMAL HUSBANDRY

AUGUST 2018

tUm. \ntIjv Inc¬ sI. BÀ. t{]m{Kmw Hm^okÀ A\na lkv_³Udn

kpc£ 2018

Animal Birth Control - AhtemI\w

DELIVERABLES

42

tImSn

^­v

2 e£w

ABC

14 M.E.Umämt_

kv

kph\o

À

CXphsc hÔywIcWw sNbvXXv

HutZymKnI IW¡nse \mbv¡fpsS F®¯nsâ 5%¯nepw Xmsg am{Xw

t\«w..! ]s£ ap¶nÂ

IqSpXÂ km²yXIÄ

kvYnXn hnhc¡W¡v

2017-18

BsIbpÅ 1034  216 F®¯nÂ

216 LSG – 20.89 %

5 PnÃIfnse 11 amks¯ {]hÀ¯\w

15623 DOGS

58 bqWnäpIfpsS BsI hcpam\w

3.23 Crores

kwkvYm\s¯ BZys¯ samss_Â ABCInnovation

9 PnÃIfnse 818 LSGGap

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

• FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

kpc£

2018

PnÃmXe

Iymws]bn

³

Some Snaps

Imcy]cn]mSnIÄ

• Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\ ta[mhnIsf

DÄs¸Sp¯n t»m¡v Xe GIZn\ inev]ime

• Ip«nIÄ¡mbn s]bnânMv aÕcw

• s]mXpP\ t_m[hXvIcW ]cn]mSnIÄ

•FÃm Xt²i kzbw`cW kvYm]\¯nepw

t]mkvädpIÄ

PnÃmXe {]hÀ¯\w - AhtemI\w

OUTCOME OF SURAKSHA CAMPAIGN

Sl.No. DISTRICT LSGsPARTICIPATION(WM + Presidents)

POPULATION

(2012 Animal Census)

FUND

2018 - 19CORRESPONDING

POPULATION

1 Thiruvananthapuram 78 0 31749 31.24 1488

2 Kollam 73 0 49582 0.00 0

3 Pathanamthitta 57 199 11548 12.62 601

4 Alappuzha 78 277 24354 147.9 7042

5 Kottayam 77 257 10924 131.58 6266

6 Idukki 54 422 5827 37.00 1762

7 Ernakulam 96 925 16647 101.64 4840

TOTAL 513 2080 150631 328.87 21999

PnÃmXe {]hÀ¯\w - AhtemI\w

OUTCOME OF SURAKSHA CAMPAIGN

Sl.No. DISTRICT LSGsPARTICIPATION(WM + Presidents)

POPULATION

(2012 Animal Census)

FUND

2018 - 19CORRESPONDING

POPULATION

8 Thrissur 94 342 32833 31.50 1500

9 Palakkad 95 0 26772 0.00 0

10 Malappuram 106 0 15198 0.00 0

11 Kozhikode 78 76 15956 0.00 0

12 Wayanad 26 331 3520 7.50 357

13 Kannur 81 0 14753 0.00 0

14 Kasaragod 41 16 9331 3.00 143

TOTAL 521 765 118363 42.00 2000

GRANT TOTAL 1034 2845 268994 503.98 23999

kpc£ 2

018kwkvYm\Xe Iymws]bn³

2845 LSG {]Xn\n[nIÄ

BsIbpÅXv 20561 ]¦mfn¯w 13.8%

503.98 e£w cq]

{]XnioÀj \nt£]w 187.4 cq]/\mb

e£yw 42 tImSn

\nehn hIbncp¯nbncn¡p¶Xv 8.83%

PnÃmXe {]hÀ¯\w - AhtemI\w

Sl.No. DISTRICT LSG TOTAL

LSG ACTUAL

LSG

%

POPULATION(2012 Animal

Census)

FUND

2018 - 19

FUND TO

POPULATION

RATIO

1 Kottayam 77 70 90.9 10924 131.58 1204.5

2 Idukki 54 54 100 5827 37 635

3 Ernakulam 96 48 50 16647 101.64 610.6

8 Alappuzha 78 78 100 24354 147.9 607.3

4 Wayanad 26 26 100 3520 7.5 213.1

5 Pathanamthitta 57 54 94.7 11548 12.62 109.3

6 Thiruvananthapuram 78 73 93.6 31749 31.24 98.4

7 Thrissur 94 0 32833 31.5 95.9

9 Kasaragod 41 0 9331 3 32.2

10 Kannur 81 0 14753 0 0

11 Malappuram 106 0 15198 0 0

12 Kozhikode 78 0 15956 0 0

13 Palakkad 95 95 100 26772 0 0

14 Kollam 73 0 49582 0 0

TOTAL 1034 498 48.16 268994 503.98 187.4

kwcw` km²yXIÄ

tlmkvä

Â

{KqanMv

tjm¸v

{_oUnMv

tUmÀ äp

tUmÀ

¢n\nIv

kwcw` km²yXIÄ

tUmKv

s{Sbn\À

ao³

Irjn

Ae¦mc

aÕyIrjn

Ghnbdn

Targets for ABCSl.No. DISTRICT FUND

PRESENT STATUS

ADDITIONAL

FUNDTOTAL FUND

(to do ABC of 70% dogs)ME UNITS

1 Kottayam 131.58 38.98 170.56 1

2 Idukki 37.00 53.98 90.98 1

3 Ernakulam 101.64 158.28 259.92 1

8 Alappuzha 147.90 232.36 54.96 1

4 Wayanad 7.50 47.46 180.31 1

5 Pathanamthitta 12.62 167.69 495.72 1

6 Thiruvananthapuram 31.24 464.48 512.65 1

7 Thrissur 31.50 481.15 380.26 1

9 Kasaragod 3.00 142.69 145.69 1

10 Kannur 0 230.35 230.35 1

11 Malappuram 0 237.30 237.30 1

12 Kozhikode 0 249.13 249.13 1

13 Palakkad 0 418.01 418.01 1

14 Kollam 0 774.16 774.16 1

TOTAL 503.98 3696.02 4200.00 14

Kerala Chicken – New Unit DemandSl.No. DISTRICT INDIVIDUAL GROUP TOTAL

1 Thrissur 80 26 106

2 Ernakulam 68 22 90

3 Wayanad 50 31 81

4 Kollam 46 16 62

5 Malappuram 40 5 45

6 Kozhikode 32 5 37

7 Alappuzha 36 0 36

8 Kasargod 36 0 36

9 Pathanamthitta 35 0 35

10 Palakkad 21 5 26

11 Kottayam 20 0 20

12 Kannur 20 0 20

13 Idukki 18 0 18

14 Thiruvananthapuram 0 0 0

Total 502 110 612

Kerala Chicken – CIF RepaymentSl.No. DISTRICT

GROUPS

SUPPORTED

GROUPS

STARTED

REPAYMENT

TOTAL

REPAYMENT

AMOUNT

GROUP

TO REPAYMENT

RATIO

1 Kollam 18 18 2.33 12968

2 Palakkad 15 9 1.11 7400

3 Kozhikode 10 7 0.68 6860

4 Kottayam 18 8 0.98 5469

5 Thiruvananthapuram 39 12 1.87 4816

6 Pathanamthitta 18 3 0.53 2982

7 Thrissur 11 3 0.29 2636

8 Idukki 19 2 0.19 1000

9 Alappuzha 21 0 0 0

10 Ernakulam 18 0 0 0

11 Malappuram 14 0 0 0

12 Wayanad 12 0 0 0

13 Kannur 6 0 0 0

14 Kasargod 20 20 0 0

TOTAL 239 82 8.01

Dairy – CIG RepaymentSl.No. DISTRICT

NO OF CDS

SELECTED

NO OF GROUPS

SUPPORTED

NO OF GROUPS STA

RTED REPAYMENT

TOTAL REPAYME

NT AMOUNTGROUP TO REP

AYMENT RATIO

1 Kottayam 7 21 21 8.95 42622

2 Alappuzha 7 21 21 8.37 39870

3 Pathanamthitta 6 18 18 6.81 37861

4 Ernakulam 8 24 24 8.90 37112

5 Idukki 8 24 24 8.81 36748

6 Thiruvananthapuram 7 21 19 6.32 30121

7 Kollam 5 15 15 4.33 28895

8 Kozhikode 5 15 15 4.20 28015

9 Palakkad 13 22 13 4.15 18886

10 Thrissur 8 24 21 3.93 16410

11 Kannur 5 15 15 1.20 8000

12 Wayanad 13 24 10 1.70 7121

13 Malappuram 4 9 0 0 0

14 Kasargod 3 3 0 0 0

TOTAL 99 256 216 67.72

Ksheera Sagaram Status

Sl. No YearNo.of

PanchaythsGroups Beneficiaries

Subsidy

Amount

Corres.

number of

Cows

1 2012 -13 21 83 415 81.50 375

2 2013 -14 16 116 598 59.80 275

3 2014 -15 48 279 1405 140.40 646

4 2015 - 16 28 159 814 115.97 533

5 2016 - 17 16 119 598 185.43 853

6 2017 - 18 15 79 397 171.68 789

Total 144 835 4227 754.80 3470

Goat Village Status

Sl. No YearNo.of

PanchaythsGroups Beneficiaries

Subsidy

Amount

Corres.

number of

Goats

1 2012 - 13 32 360 1803 180.30 7212

2 2013 -14 120 1457 7322 732.00 29280

3 2014 -15 107 1216 6042 604.00 24160

4 2015 - 16 43 379 1926 192.60 7704

5 2016 - 17 36 324 1641 164.10 6564

6 2017 -18 23 206 1045 101.42 4057

Total 361 3942 19779 1974.42 78977

Goat Village Expected Population

0.0

50.0

100.0

150.0

200.0

250.0

2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Po

pu

lati

on

in

10

00

’s

TARGETS

ONE ME UNIT/DISTRICT

42 CRORE ABC FUND

IMPACT STUDY GV KS

VIABILITY STUDY - EGG

CIG CIF REPAYMENT

Thank you