planner as expert by geordie gordon, nru publishing inc

Upload: daniel-fusca

Post on 21-Feb-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/24/2019 Planner as Expert by Geordie Gordon, NRU Publishing Inc.

    1/2

    FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2015 Vol. 19 No.4

    Steve Paikin

    When planning

    and politics collide

    p 3 >

    Height reduction

    Board rules on

    LuCliff Place

    p 11 >

    Dollars and cents

    Transit funding

    challenge

    p2 >

    INSIDE

    Professional-political divide

    PLANNERAS EXPERTBy Geordie Gordon

    City o oronto chie planner Jennifer Keesmaat told an

    audience o planning proessionals that planners need to

    reclaim their role as experts and not be swayed rom their

    proessional opinion in the interests o political expediency.

    Te proession needs to reocus itsel on planner as expert,

    and away rom planner as acilitator.

    Speaking to members o the Ontario Professional Planners

    Instituteat its annual conerence this week, Keesmaat talked

    about the relationships between planners and elected offi cials.

    She called on planners to not let the work that they do be

    compromised by what she called the proessional-political

    divide.

    Speaking withNRUafer her keynote address, Keesmaat high-

    lighted the ofen contentious work environment that planners

    have to navigate.

    Planners are immersed in an environment that, by necessity,

    is raught with constant tension. Our opportunity is to bridge

    the administrative-political divide by embracing evidence, data,

    negotiation and leadership in our planning practice.

    Ward 27 Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tamagrees that planners

    ofen work in environments where

    TORONTO EDITION

    Economics Matters

    416-641-9500 1-877-953-9948

    [email protected]

    altusgroup.com

    demographics

    construction economics planning impacts

    real estate markets expert testimony forecasting

    Addressing Torontos challenges

    FEDERALROLEBy Leah Wong

    City o oronto leaders are seeking a ederal partner tha

    will help address its biggest challengesaffordable housing

    transit, gridlock and preparing the city or the impacts o

    climate change.

    Te ederal leaders are paying attention to oronto. Give

    the citys shif away rom being a Liberal stronghold in th

    2011 ederal election, the parties all see opportunities to win

    seats in Canadas largest city.

    With changes to the ederal ridings shaking up the down

    town boundaries, candidates rom all parties are looking t

    take advantage o changing demographics in three key ridings

    Spadina-Fort York, oronto Centre and University-Rosedale

    With the creation o new downtown ridings oronto is gettin

    an additional representative in this election.

    While Liberal MPs Chrystia Freeland and Adam Vaugha

    won their ridings or the Liberal Party in recent by-elections

    the boundaries have changed signicantly since then.

    Freeland is running in University-Rosedale against broadcas

    journalist Jennifer Hollett (NDP), lawyer Karim Jivraj (Con

    servative) and lawyer Nick Wright (Green Party). With Freelan

    running in the new University-RosedaleCONTINUED PAGE 5 > CONTINUED PAGE 6

  • 7/24/2019 Planner as Expert by Geordie Gordon, NRU Publishing Inc.

    2/2

    CITY OF TORONTO EDITION FRIDAY, OCTOBER 9, 20

    consensus on a particular topic is never a certainty. But they

    should remain committed to their proessional opinion,regardless o what end result o the political process may be.

    I [the chie planner is talking] about ensuring that

    planners uphold their proessional opinion and stand by the

    integrity o their proessional opinions regardless o what

    may or may not happen on the oor o council, I think thats

    what they should do. Tey should always adhere to their core

    planning principles, recommendations inormed by good

    planning, regardless o what direction the political winds may

    send them in, she told NRU.

    Keesmaat warned that planners, when ocussed on what

    they think can realistically be accomplished, may be losingsight o what their proessional opinion should be.

    In some instances, weve gotten so used to [the

    proessional-political divide] that we dont even begin with

    recommendations that are rooted in the idealism o creating

    great communities, weve actually become a bit trapped. We

    lessen our own aspirations or our city, or our planning

    work, because we dont have the condence, the belie that

    the gul between proessional practice and politics will ever be

    bridged, Keesmaat said.

    Wong-am says that occasional disagreement between

    council and planning staff is part o the ramework in whichmunicipal planning takes place. Furthermore, political

    decisions are not made based solely on planning evidence.

    I have over 100 development les, and I can tell you that

    the planners that I work with in downtown, midtown oronto,

    are extremely proessional, extremely intelligent, they

    know exactly what theyre talking about, and we have, more

    ofen times than not, agreement on where they land on their

    planning decisions.

    And then there are times that we may disagree. But Ill tell

    them, you write the report that you need to write, because its

    the right thing to do, because that is what you honestly believein your proessional opinion, and perhaps I may need to make

    a different political decision, she said.

    Wong-am also says that the prospect o an OMB hearing

    has a signicant impact on the relationship between planning

    and politics. She characterizes the OMB process as problematic

    when it comes to land use planning and development in

    Ontario and the threat o an appeal is ofen used by developers

    as way to get what they want.

    Whatever the context, Keesmaat stressed the importance bridging the divide but not blurring the lines between planne

    and politicians.

    Id like to suggest that this political-administrative divid

    does exist, and we do have tools to bridge the gap. But th

    most common tool weve used, mysel included, is the lea

    effective: We loosen our grip on our vision, we loosen our gr

    on our idealism, on our belie that achieving something gre

    is in act possible. Tat is one way to bridge the gap, but, m

    oh my, its dangerous. Its consequences are ar reaching an

    undamentally undermine the overall integrity o our experti

    as proessionals. In act it is a way o bridging the divide thsimply blurs the lines, she said.

    I planners go too ar in adjusting their positions, Keesma

    warns, We begin as planners to resemble politicians. Politicianhave a critical and important role in our democratic proces

    but it is not [a planners] role. I were going to act politic

    instead o acting proessional, we might as well be politician

    we might as well run or offi ce. nru

    PLANNER AS EXPERTCONTINUED FROM PAGE1

    In some instances, weve gotten so used to [the

    professional-political divide] that we dont even begin

    with recommendations that are rooted in the idealism

    of creating great communities, weve actually become

    a bit trapped. Jennifer Keesma