planning and development act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · planning and development act 2005 ....

20

Upload: dangtu

Post on 08-Mar-2018

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham
Page 2: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham
Page 3: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

Planning and Development Act 2005

Shire of Kalamunda Local Planning Scheme No. 3

Metro East Joint Development Assessment Panel

Determination on Development Assessment Panel Application for Planning Approval

Location: Lot 100 (121) Canning Road, Kalamunda Description of proposed Development: Extension of an Existing Supermarket In accordance with regulation 8 of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011, the above application for planning approval was granted on 15 July 2016, subject to the following: Approve DAP Application reference DAP/16/01042 and accompanying plans SK01 Site Plan, SK02 Floor Plan and SK03 Elevations in accordance with Schedule 2, Part 9, Clause 68 of the of the Planning and Development (Local Planning Schemes) Regulations 2015, subject to the following conditions: Conditions 1. This decision constitutes planning approval only and is valid for a period of 2

years from the date of approval. If the subject development is not substantially commenced within the 2 year period, the approval shall lapse and be of no further effect.

2. Development shall be carried out in accordance with the terms of the application as approved herein and all approved plans (including any amendments made by the Metro East JDAP).

3. Before applying for a building permit, the applicant shall provide a detailed

schedule of external materials, finishes and colours to the satisfaction of the Shire of Kalamunda. For the purposes of this condition, design features similar to those depicted in the revised north elevation dated 1 July 2016 shall be applied to the north and west walls of the proposed development. The building must thereafter be completed in accordance with the approved materials, finishes and colours.

4. The site is to be connected to the reticulated sewerage system. 5. A landscaping and irrigation plan for the northern portion of the development

site and adjoining road verge adjacent to the proposed development is to be submitted to, and approved by, the Shire of Kalamunda.

6. Landscaping and irrigation of the northern portion of the development site and

adjoining road verge adjacent to the proposed development is to be installed prior to occupying the proposed development, and thereafter maintained, in accordance with the approved landscaping plan to the satisfaction of the Shire of Kalamunda.

Page 1 of 2

Page 4: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

7. The seven (7) existing street trees adjacent to the north boundary located on the Seymour Road verge shall be protected and maintained with no pruning permitted without the prior approval of the Shire of Kalamunda.

8. Prior to commencing site works, the landowner/applicant shall submit and obtain Shire approval of a construction management plan detailing measures to minimise nuisance to nearby properties (including dust, noise, waste, vibration and vehicle parking) during site works and construction. Works shall thereafter be completed in accordance with the approved construction management plan, during the entire construction phase.

9. Stormwater runoff generated from the proposed development shall be

contained on site.

10. Any modifications to vehicle access ways that are required to facilitate the proposed development shall be suitably constructed, sealed and drained to the specifications and satisfaction of the Shire of Kalamunda.

Advice Notes 1. The applicant is advised that the food premises must comply with the Food Act

2008 and Food Standards Code. The premise must meet all requirements and pass an inspection without requiring any corrective actions before the commencement of trade. Further advice on these requirements is available from the Shire of Kalamunda Environmental Health Services.

2. The applicant is reminded of their obligations to comply with the “Land

development sites and impacts on air quality: a guideline for the prevention of dust and smoke pollution from land development sites in Western Australia”, prepared by the Department of Environment & Regulation.

3. Any plant or equipment placed on or adjacent to the northern boundary of the new development is required to comply with the Environmental Protection (Noise) Regulations 1997.

4. The applicant is advised that the seven (7) mature trees adjacent to the north

boundary are located on the Seymour Road verge. Development works adjacent to these trees are to be carried out in accordance with Australian Standard 4970 (2009) Protection of trees on Development sites.

5. As part of the construction management plan, the applicant is strongly

encouraged to provide a Structural Engineer’s dilapidation report, specifying which structures on adjacent/adjoining sites may be adversely affected by the works and providing a record of the existing condition of the structures. A copy of each dilapidation report should be submitted to the Shire of Kalamunda and the owners of affected adjacent properties.

Where an approval has so lapsed, no development shall be carried out without further approval having first been sought and obtained, unless the applicant has applied and obtained Development Assessment Panel approval to extend the approval term under regulation 17(1)(a) of the Planning and Development (Development Assessment Panels) Regulations 2011.

Page 2 of 2

Page 5: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL - APPROVED - 15 JULY 2016

Page 6: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL - APPROVED - 15 JULY 2016

Page 7: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT PANEL - APPROVED - 15 JULY 2016

Page 8: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham
Page 9: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham
Page 10: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

Attachment 5 – Schedule of Submissions

Nature of submission Submitter name Officer Comment

No objection Tracey Henderson 8 Lane Road, Kalamunda

Noted.

Page 11: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham
Page 12: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

Document Status

0 A Wetton

A Wetton

SHAWMAC PTY LTD ABN 51 828 614 001

PO BOX 937

SOUTH PERTH WA 6951

T: + 61 8 93551300

F: + 61 8 93551922

E: [email protected]

© Shawmac Pty. Ltd . 2016

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

I . . . . .

EWilks 13/04/16 Draft

EWilks 14/04/16 Review

Z:\JobsActive 2016\T&T - Traffic and P..-king\Whelans Kalamunda Glades Shopping Centre expansion\Report\Whelans_Kalamunda Glades_TIA_V1.docx

ii

I . .

13/04/16

14/04/16

Page 13: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

=== SHAW MAC

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

CONTENTS

1. Introduction .... .. ... ............... ...... ....... ............. .... .............. ..... ....... ....... .. ....... ..... ..... ........ ........... .. .. .................... 1

1.1 . Proponent ........ ......... .... ... ...................... ............ .... ............. ... ...................... ............. .... ......................... 1

1.2. Site Location and Land Use ....... ......... ...... .................... .. ....................................... ........ .. ..................... 1

1.3. Reference Information .. .. ........................................................... .. .... .............. ....... .. ... ... .. ...... .............. ... 2

2. Site Proposal ........................ ... ............................ ........................................ .... .. ............................................. 3

2.1 . Regional Context ........ .... ..... .... ....... ... ..... ....... ........... .. ...... ... .... .......... ...... .. ........ ... ....... ........ .............. .... 3

2.2. Proposed Land Use ... ................... .. ....... ........ ........ .. ....... ....... ..... ......... ........... .... ............... ..... .... .... ....... 3

2.3. Major Attractors and Generators of Traffic .... ....... .. ................... .. ........................... ......... .... ................. .4

3. Existing Situation ... .... .... ... .......... ......... .. .......... ............................................................................ ......... .......... 6

3.1 . Existing Roads .. ... .... ... ..... ... ................. .... .. ...................... .......... ....................................... ...... ... .... ..... ... 6

3.2. Road Hierarchy vs Actual Flows ......................... ...... ......... .. ............ .. .................. ........ .... ........... ..... ..... . 7

3.3. Changes to the Surrounding Network .... .... .................................. .... ... .... .. ........ ....... ........ .. ...... ......... ..... 8

3.4. Existing Traffic Generation .... .. .... ... .. ... ........... .. ............... .. ............................ ... ..... .... ..... .. ... .. ... ... ... .... ... 8

4. Transport Assessment ........ ..... ... ......... ... .. ..................................................................................................... 9

4.1. Assessment Years ................. ....... ............... .... ...... ..... ....... .. .. ... .... ... ...... .................................... .... ..... ... 9

4.2. Time Periods for Assessment.. .............................................................................................................. 9

4.3. Development Generation and Distribution .............................. ...... .......... ...................... ................ .. ..... .. 9

4.4. Distribution .............. .. ......... ........... .. ... .... .. ............. .. .................. ............. .. .. .. .... .. ....................... .. .. ......... 9

4.5. Impact on Intersections .... ............. ....... .. .... ........... .. ............... ... .. ................... .......... ............ .. ... ... .... ... 11

5. Pedestrian and Cycle Networks .................................. .. ............................................................................... 12

6. Public Transport ................. .......................... ...... .. ... ... ............................... ...... ... ... ............. .............. .. ... ... ... . 13

7. Parking ...... ...................... ........... .................................................................... .. ...... .... ....... ...... ..................... 14

7.1. Car Parking ..................................................................................... .... ..... ........ ............ .... ... ................. 14

7.2. Parking Layout. ...................... ... ...... ... ................................. ... .. .. ............. ...... .. .... ..... .............. ............. . 15

8. Site Access ......... ......... ..... .... ........ .. .... .. ..... ........ .. ............ ............................................................................. 16

8.1 . Development Accesses ....................................................................................................................... 16

iii

Page 14: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

8.2. Service Vehicles ....... .......... ............... ...... ........... ........ .......... ....... ................... .. ......................... ..... ..... 16

8.3. Access Vehicle Sight Distance ........................ .... ........................................ .... .. ............ .................. .. .. 16

8.4. Access Pedestrian Sight Distance .... ......... .... .... .. .. ..... ........ ... .................... ............... ..... ... .. ... ............ .. 17

9. Conclusion .... ... .............. ................... .. .... .............. ........ ....... .... ....... .. ..... ... ..... .... ............... ......... ....... .... ........ 18

Appendix A- Site Plan ..... .. ................ ........ ... ................. ..... ............ ... .... ...... .............. .. .... .. .. ..... ... .... .... ... .............. 19

Appendix B - Traffic Counts .................... .... .................. ......... .. ..... .......... ....... ... ........ .... .. .. ............ ....... .......... .. .... . 21

Appendix C- SIDRA Movement Summary Results ........ .. ...... ........ .. ............................ .. .............. .... .............. ...... 24

TABLES

Table 1 - Road Classification and Indicative Maximum Traffic Volumes .... .................. .... .... ................................... 7

Table 2- Existing Thursday Trip Generation .... ........ .. ...... .. .......... ...... ..... .... ................ ...... ........... ........ .................. 8

Table 3 - Predicted Daily Trip Generation .. .. ............ ............................................................................................... 9

Table 4-Predicted site-generated traffic volumes ............ .................................................... ........ ........................ 10

Table 5 - Analysis Warrants ........... ................ .. ............ .. ... ....... ........ ....... ........... ...... .. ............. .. .. .. .............. ........ .. 11

Table 6- Maximum Parking Provisions - Residential ...... .......... ................................................ ..... .................. .. .. 14

Table 7 -AS 2890 requirements .......... .. .. .. .......... ...... ................ ...... .. ........ ........... .... ........ ... ........................ .. .. .... . 15

FIGURES

Figure 1 -Site Location ...... ...... ...... ........ ............. ........... ..... ... ......... .... .... ...... ........ .... .. ............................................ 1

Figure 2 - Local Context ......... ...... ... ...... ........... ........ ..... ...... ... ......................................................... .. .. ..... .... ........ ... 2

Figure 3 - Regional Context ...................................... ..... .. ... ..... ... ................... .... .. ................................................... 3

Figure 4 - Zoning .................................................................. .. ... .... ... ..... ..... ... .................................... .................... .. 4

Figure 5- Major Attractors and Generators .............................. ....... ...... .. ....... .......... ...... .................................. .. .. .. 5

Figure 6 - Road Hierarchy ........ .. ...... .......... .. .. .................... .. .. ........................... .............. ..... ... .. .. ............... ........ ..... 7

Figure 7 - Site Generated Traffic - Daily Traffic .. ............ .... ...... ........ .... .............. .......... ...... ................ .... .............. 11

Figure 8 - Cyclist Facilities ....... .... .............. .. ............................ ........ ......................... ............ .... ... ......................... 12

Figure 9 - Public Transport Facilities ................. ............ ...... ............................................................ .. .. ............ ...... 13

iv

Page 15: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

-- Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

Figure 10 - Thursday PM Peak Parking Demand .... .... .. ........... .. .... ... ....................... ..... .... .. ............... .. .. .. .. ......... . 14

Figure 11 - Saturday Peak Parking Demand .. ........ ......... .............. .... ............ ............ .. ...... .. .. .. ...... ...... .... .... ......... 15

Figure 12 - Sight Distance Requirements .... ...... ...... .... .. .. ............ ...... .... .. .......... .......... .... .......... .. .. ............. .......... 16

Figure 13 - AS 2890 Requirements for Pedestrian Sight Lines .... ............ ............ .... .. ................ .. ... .... .......... .... .. .. 17

v

Page 16: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

1. Introduction

1.1. Proponent

Shawmac Pty Ltd has been commissioned by Whelans Town Planning to review the proposed expansion of the

existing Kalamunda Glades Shopping Centre.

1.2. Site Location and Land Use

The site in located as shown in Figure 1 at 123 Canning Road, Kalamunda.

p Grove

Sampson Rd

Spnnodale Rd

B

l!I

Spnngdale Rd

Site W-lhs Kel&mu ~·

'111 CIJhcard ATM

BWS Kelrununda

le'o\ltSAd

Figure 1 - Site Location

Seymour Rd

Le..1sRd

Lal0< Pl

The study site is currently used as a Shopping Centre, with a supermarket, liquor store, pharmacy and

newsagency, Japanese takeaway store, delicatessen, and former video store .. The existing site together with

the surrounding area is shown on the aerial photograph on Figure 2.

Page 17: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

==

SHAW MAC

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

Figure 2 - Local Context

1.3. Reference Information

In undertaking the study, the information listed below was referenced.

• MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria;

• Livable Neighborhoods Guidelines 2009;

• Austroads Guide to Road Design, Part 4A;

• Austroads Guide to Traffic Management, Part 3, Traffic Studies and Analysis;

• WAPC R-Codes;

• Guide to Traffic Generating Developments Version 2.2, October 2002 - Roads and Traffic Authority,

New South Wales; and

• Trip Generation 7th edition, 2003 - Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, USA

2

Page 18: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

2. Site Proposal

2.1. Regional Context

The site is located within the Shire of Kalamunda and is bound by Canning Road , Seymour Road, Lane Road

and Lewis Road. Figure 3 shows the site location in a regional context.

Warwick

sley Balga a..,._ Rd

M1rrabooka

0

Balcatta

hng ~

2.2. Proposed Land Use

Ballajura

WhilM>On Park

Bassendean

Ascot

Perth Airport

P 1h Aioport +

I 1 West Swan

I CD

Midland

Q1

H19 ~ wycombe

CD

Red ~ill

e Jane Brook Siratton

t II

swan View John Forrtsf Nattomtl Park

Greenmount Grttnmo0nr

NauonalParlc Glen Forrest

Helena Valley Darlln91on

Maida Vale

Burswood Kewdale

G East Victoria

Park

Welshpool

Bentley

Riverton W

• - li

1 v ~ .

Queens Park

Figure 3 - Regional Context

SITE

Walhslon

Lesmurd1e

Bickley

CD Carmel

Ban owfa

a

p,

The application proposes the extension to the north of the existing shopping centre, with an approximate area

increase of 650m2. The subject site is zoned Commercial, with 'Shop' as a permitted use within the zone. See

Figure 4 for an extract from the Shire of Kalamunda Local Planning Scheme No. 3 (LPS3).

3

Page 19: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

--

.. Commercial

.. Distrid centre

c=J General industry

c::J Industrial development

~ Light industry

c=J Mixed use

Private dubs and institutions

~ Residential

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

Figure 4 - Zoning

An extract of the development site layout is shown in Appendix A.

2.3. Major Attractors and Generators of Traffic

The site has good connection to the Perth CBD and the Graham Farmer, Mitchell and Kwinana Freeways via

Thomas Road.

The main attractors and generators expected to influence traffic flows to and from the site include:

• Freight Distribution Centres; and

• Suburban residential areas;

Figure 5 shows the main desire lines to and from the site.

4

Page 20: Planning and Development Act 2005 daps/metro east jdap... · Planning and Development Act 2005 . ... • MRWA Functional Hierarchy Criteria; ... Parle f J West Swan Daylon C~versham

SHAW MAC

Q1 WarwK:k

sl•y Balga e...., ..

Mrrrabooka

v fl'

...,""""' ll>

Dianella

North P•rth

~

BallajUfa

Noranda

Consulting Civil and Traffic Engineers, Risk Managers

.............

w

W Kiara

Wh11eman Parle f J

West Swan

Daylon

C~versham

Red Hill

~ Jan• Brook

i &:

Swan View JohnFonosr NalfOl}ltlPMk

A Gall<fia CD Bassendcan

Ascot Q)

P.~rport Freight ano ~1 Al<W .t. HigH

uistributi n CentreS>'"be Q)

Maida Vale

Figure 5 - Major Attractors and Generators

5

Greenmount G rtt111TIOUnt

Nar10MJP11rk

Hel•na Vall•y Darlington

\

Glen Forrest

Residential

Pi