planning for teaching and learning in efl
TRANSCRIPT
1
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
PlanningforteachingandlearninginEFLEffectsofstandardisationandstandardisedtestingonthelearningandteachingofEFLatlowersecondarylevelClaudiaMewald*
AbstractThispaperdescribes thewashbackof competenceorientationandcompetenceoriented testingonplanningteachingandlearninginEnglishasaforeignlanguage(EFL)atAustrianlowersecondaryschools.ItanalysestheperceivedneedsofteachersworkinginEFLclassroomsingeneralsecondary,newmiddleschoolsandacademicsecondaryschoolsbasedonamixedmethodsstudy.Thestudyreliesondatafromon-linesurveys,interviews,non-participant observation and document research and this paper puts a focus on planning teaching andlearning.Findingspointtowardstheneedtoencouragelong-termplanningonthebasisofasetofdescriptorsfor eachof the four yearsof lower secondary foreign languageeducation. Thedescriptorspresented in thispaperareintendedtobuildabasisforassessingandtestingcommunicativecompetenceatbeginnerandlowerintermediatelevel.Moreover,theycanbeusedtoprovideformativefeedbackthatcaninformtheplanningofteachingandlearninginEFLclassrooms.
DasPlanenvonLehrenundLernenimUnterrichtsfachEnglischalsFremdspracheAuswirkungenderStandardisierungundstandardisierterÜberprüfungenaufdasLehrenundLerneninderSekundarstufeI
Zusammenfassung
Dieser Artikel beschreibt den Washback, also die Auswirkungen der Kompetenzorientierung und derstandardisierten Überprüfungen auf das Planen von Lehren und Lernen im Englischunterricht derSekundarstufe 1. Die akuten Bedürfnisse der Lehrkräfte, die das Fach Englisch in Hauptschulen, NeuenMittelschulen und in Allgemein bildenden höheren Schulen unterrichten,wurden in einer Mixed-Methods-Studie unter Heranziehung von Daten aus einer On-line Befragung, Interviews, nicht-teilnehmendenBeobachtungenundDokumentenanalysenerhobenundbeschrieben.DieserArtikelfokussiertdenTeilbereichdesPlanensvonLehrenundLernen imEnglischunterricht.DieErgebnissezeigtendendringendenBedarfderUnterstützung der Lehrkräfte bei der längerfristigen Planung von Unterricht durch die Entwicklung einerSammlung vonDeskriptoren für jeden Jahrgang.DieDeskriptoren solleneineBasis für dasÜberprüfenundBeurteilen von kommunikativer Kompetenz von Anfängern und leicht fortgeschrittenen Lernern undLernerinnendarstellen.AußerdemkönnensiebeiderFormulierungvonformativemFeedback,welchesbeimPlanenvonLehrenundLernenzumEinsatzkommt,dienlichsein.Keywords: Schlüsselwörter:BackwardDesign RückwärtigesLerndesignCommunicativecompetence KommunikativeKompetenzFormativeassessment FormativeBeurteilungStandardisationandstandardisedtesting StandardisierungundstandardisierteÜberprüfungenWashback Washback
*PädagogischeHochschuleNiederösterreich,Mühlgasse67,2500Baden.E-mail:[email protected]
2
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
1 Introduction
As early as 1993, Alderson and Wall described the effects of testing on teaching and learning in fifteenhypotheses.Withtheirclaimthat“testscanbepowerfuldeterminers,bothpositivelyandnegatively,ofwhathappensinclassrooms”(1993,p.117),washbackbecameawidelydiscussedissueinadditiontothepreviouslyquotedopinionthat“teacherswillteachtoatest(…)iftheyknowthecontentofatestand/ortheformatofatest…” (Swain,1985). Shohamyconceptualiseswashback in itswider contextandargues thatmeasurement-driveninstruction“drive[s]learning;curriculumalignmentfocusesontheconnectionbetweentestingandtheteaching syllabus; and systemic validity implies the integration of tests into the educational system and theneedtodemonstrate that the introductionofanewtestcan improve learning” (1993,p.7;emphasis in theoriginal).However,sheaddsthatdespitetheobviousconnectionbetweentestingandlearning,littleisknownaboutitseffects.
WheneducationalstandardswereenactedinAustriain2009,theyhadalreadybeentrialledinafive-yearpilotat lower secondary schoolswith thegoal tobeused in standardised testing. Shortlybefore their legalenactment,thecontentgoalsintheformofalistoffunctionsandnotionswerereplacedbysuchthatrelyondescriptors from the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching,assessment (CEFR; Council of Europe, 2001) at levels A1 to B1. The general goals and themethodologicalguidelineshavestayedthesame.Theso-called“ÜbergreifendenDynamischenFertigkeiten”(BIFIE&ÖSZ,2011,pp.14-15),henceforthcalled“DynamicCompetences”,whichwerepartofthestandardssetupbythegroupofdevelopers(Gassner,etal.,2005),wereneitherconsideredforimplementationintotothedecree,nordidtheyfindtheirwayintothecurriculum.
InApril2013,whenthefirststandardisedtest(E8test)wasimplemented,76,728pupilsin1,410schoolssatthistestinlistening,readingandwriting,whileonly2,744pupilstookitsspeakingcomponent(BIFIE,2014,pp.13, 68). The goal of standardised testing in Austria is systemmonitoring and the results of E8 testing areintendedtobeusedtoinformqualityassuranceandschooldevelopment.Thus,theE8testisconsideredalow-stakestestintermsofitsimpactonthepupils’learningbecauseitdoesnothaveanybearingontheirgradesanditsresultsarepublishedwhenmostofthemhavealreadylefttheirschools.
Thefocusofthispaperisonthewashbackofstandardisationandstandardisedtestingontheteachingandlearning of English as a foreign language (EFL) at classroom level in Shohamy’s terms (1993). It exploreswhetherstandardisationandstandardisedtestshavedrivenlearningandifcurriculumalignmenthasbroughtabout a sufficiently effective connection between testing and teaching. Moreover, it seeks to find out ifstandards and standardised tests have been successfully integrated into the educational systemand if theirintroductionhasimprovedlearning.
2 TheoreticalconsiderationsThe notion of competence oriented education was discussed intensively by general educationalists such asKlafki, Habermas, or Roth, as well as linguists in the early 1970s. In language education, competenceorientationcoincidedwiththedevelopmentofthecommunicativeapproachand its focusoncommunicativecompetence which is commonly described as the knowledge and skill to use a language effectively forcommunication ( (Brumfit& Johnson,1979;Canale&Swain,1980;Hymes,1972;Swain,2000).Competenceoriented approaches or competency-based language teaching (CBLT), used interchangeably in this paper,additionally emphasise functional, interactional and social aspects of language and its role as amedium ofinteractionbetweenpeoplewhowant toachievespecificgoalsandpurposes in real life (Richards&Rogers,2014).
CBLTestablishesadirectlinktocriterion-basedassessmentwhereperformancecriteriaarethebasisfortheassessment of language competencies defined in essential skills, knowledge, attitudes, and behavioursrequiredfortheeffectiveperformanceofareal-worldtask(Bachman&Palmer,2010;Linn&Gronlund,2000;Richards&Rogers,2014;Stiggins,Arter,Chappuis,&Chappuis,2006).AccordingtoAuerbach(1986,pp.414-415), CBLT programmes are characterised by the following components: a focus on real life, task orperformance-centred orientation, modularised instruction, outcomes that are made explicit in advance,continuousassessment,demonstratedmasteryofperformanceobjectives,andindividualised,learner-centredinstruction.
Inthelastfifteenyears,competenceorientationhasbeendirectlyassociatedwiththeCEFRandcriteriaare
3
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
phrased as can-do statements. TheCEFRplays a prominent role in Europe andbeyondandhas contributedvaluably to the paradigm shift from a deficit oriented to a performance oriented approach that puts thelearnersatthecentreofthelearningprocess.Itprovidesthemwiththeopportunitytorelatetocompetenciesthatarespecificandpracticalandwhichcanbejudgedtoberelevantandusefulornot.Can-dostatementsarespecificandpublic.Theyhelplearnerstounderstandwhatneedstobelearned,whatremainstobelearnedorwhatcouldbelearnednext(Richards&Rogers,2014,p.153).Successcriteriaprovidelearnersnotonlywiththe opportunity to identify the goals and to selectways to get there, they also help them self-assess theirlearningandtounderstanditsmainpurpose(Black&William,1998).
TheAustrianeducationalstandardsforforeignlanguagesforEFL(E8standards)encompassdescriptorsforreceptiveandproductivelanguageskillsfromA1toB1levelaswellassuchforthe“DynamicCompetences”,which comprisedescriptors for communication strategies, social competence, intercultural competence, andlanguage learning competence. The language performance descriptors are meant to describe the expectedlinguisticlearningoutcomesaftereightyearsofforeignlanguageeducation.
Whenteachersmakeuseofcan-dodescriptorstoplanteachingandlearning,theycreateroadmapstheirlearners can follow to take themtoaparticulardestination.Thus, theseplansalsomapwhat thepupilsareexpectedtolearn-thegoal-andhowlearningwillbestimulatedeffectivelyduringthelesson-theroutetogetthere(Mewald2014b).
AccordingtoWigginsandMcTighe(2005),thelearningobjectivesofanylessonshouldreflectthe“biggergoals”. In EFL education, this is the communicative competence that the learners are expected to develop.Communicative competence shows in theability touse the languageeffectively in authentic situations. ThisultimategoalisdescribedcomprehensivelyintheCEFRandthe“biggergoals”toguideteachingandlearninginAustrianFLclassroomsarethegoalsdescribedintheAustrianNationalCurriculum(BMBF,2016)andintheE8Standardsdescriptors (BMUKK,2009).Theyconstitute the foundation foranyplanning. Thecurriculargoalsbreakdownthe“biggergoals”intolearningobjectivesforeachyear.Thesearethe“steppingstonestoreachthebiggergoalsaswellastheultimategoalofcommunicativecompetence”(Mewald,2014b,p.2).
In“BackwardDesign” (Wiggins&McTighe,2005) and incompetenceorientedFLeducation,goalsettinghappensbeforechoosingcontentoractivitiestoteach.Thisensuresthatthecontenttaughtandtheactivitieschosenremainfocusedandareorganisedtowardsthe“biggergoals”tobereached.Assoonasthe“steppingstones”, the learning objectives, are identified, the target performance needs to be described and anappropriate assessment has to be found before teaching and learning can be planned. Conceptualising thetargetperformanceanditsassessmentbeforedecidingonactivitiesormaterialsisimportanttomakesurethatthe assessment, be it formative or summative, reflects the goals.When the assessment is alignedwith thelearninggoals,theendbecomesthebeginningandthepathsforteachingandlearningbecomedistinct.
Appropriate assessment, as described above, provides feedback which is based on defined goals andlearning outcomes that are fleshed out in performance descriptors. Descriptors define the expectedperformance and criteria of success provide information about its varying levels and qualities. They tellteachers and learners about the target performance, its expected level and the quality (not deficits) of theperformancebeloworbeyond the target. Thus learnerswill knowhow faron theway to success theyhavealreadytravelledwhentheyaregivenfeedback.Itisobviousthatsomelearnerswillreachthegoalearlierthanothers.Somemayreachthetargetgoalreallyquickly,othersmayrequiremoretime,choosedifferentpathstogetthereoraimatdifferentendresults.Assessmentthatprovidesfeedbackonwherethelearnersareontheirwaytothegoalandwhatstepsarestilltobetakentoreachitisthereforeassessmentforlearning.Tobeableto provide feedback that gives direction, descriptors need to be broken down into manageable steps.Moreover,theyneedtobepreciseandgradedtoshowthelearner’sprogressonthewaytosuccess.
3 MethodsThis paper is based on a longitudinal study which addresses the washback of competence orientation andcompetenceorientedtestingonteachingandlearninginEFLclassrooms.Amixedmethodsdesignwasappliedinwhichquantitativeandqualitativedatawerecollectedsequentially,analysedseparately,andthenmergedthrough triangulation. In this study, quantitative data were used as a springboard to examine the fifteenWashbackHypothesesbyAlderson&Wall(1993)whichpredictthattestingwouldinfluencetheteachingandlearningofaforeignlanguage.Todoso,aquantitativeon-linesurveyexploredthestatusquoofteachingandlearning of foreign languages at lower secondary level in Austria before the enactment of standards. Asubsequent longitudinal qualitative study explored thewashback effect of standardisation and standardised
4
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
testingontheteachingandlearningofEFLingeneralsecondaryschoolswithstreamingaswellasinacademicsecondaryschoolsandnewmiddleschools(NMS),i.e.inpotentiallymoreheterogeneoussettings.Thereasonforcollectingbothquantitativeandqualitativedatawastoexplorethewashbackfromanoverallaswellasanindividual perspective taking on a phenomenographic approach in order to be able to describe how therelevant stakeholders experience the washback. To capture the views of all relevant agents, the researchdesignconsideredthefollowinggroupsofstakeholders:
Level1:Organisinginstitutionsandchangeagents(ministry,schoolauthoritiesetc.)Level2:Executinginstitutionsandchangeagents(universities,universitycollegesofeducation,coursebookwriters,publishersetc.)Level3:Implementinginstitutionsandchangeagents(headteachers,teachers,pupils,parents)
The design then created varying focus areas in the exploration of the washback at the three levels.Whileeducationalchange,theperceivedneedsofteachersandteachereducationanddevelopmentwereconsideredmost interesting at the organising level, supportingmeasuresweremost important in the explorationwithchangeagentsattheexecutinglevel.Finally,theimpactoftestingonteachingwasinthecentreofinterestintheresearchofimplementinginstitutions.
Fig.1:Researchdesign:Varyinggoalsatfourlevels
Thus,thestudyexplored“thedescriptionsandexplanationsprovidedbyothers[thestakeholders]toidentifycriticalvariationsinthecollectiveexperience”(Feig&Alison,2011,p.26)andtriangulateddatafromvaryingreportswiththeinitialquantitativesurvey.WashbackstudiesbyCheng (2005) ,Cheng,Watanabe&Curtis (2004),Green (2007) ,Wall (2005)andmostimportantly the classical washback hypotheses by Alderson & Wall (1993) were used as an analyticalframeworkinthedesignofthisstudy.
Fig.2:Mixedmethodsdesign
5
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Data fromquestionnaireswere interpreted using descriptive statistics to develop observation and interviewschedulesandsurveysforheadteachers,parentsandpupils.Sequentialtriangulationmadeuseoftheconstantcomparative method (Strauss & Corbin, 1990; Strauss & Corbin, 1998) within an analytic framework thatmapped Watanbe’s five dimensions of washback (1997) onto Shohamy’s criteria (1993) to describe theconnectionbetweentestingandlearning.
4 Findings
The resultsof the first standardised test in Englishwerepublished in January 2014, almosthalf a year afterpupilshadsat it.Mostof themhad left theirschoolsandreportswerepresentedtoparentswhosechildrenhadnotbeentestedandwouldnotbetested.Thus, theE8testhas tobeconsidereda lowstakes testwithregardtoitsimpactonthetesttakers’learning.
TheeffectsofE8testingonteachingandlearning inAustrianEFLclassroomshavetobeevaluated inthelight of this fact. Nevertheless, the washback is expected to be specific because the schools and teachersreceivemonitoredfeedbackbasedontheirpupils’testresults(BIFIE,2014).Itsintensity,ontheotherhand,isexpectedtobeweakwhileitsimpactislikelytobelong-lastingduetoitslegalenactment.
The initialon-linesurveycarriedout in2009provided informationabout the teachers’habits inplanningteaching and learning in terms of the selection of goals, content, activities and materials. It suggests thatteachers mostly made use of the course book in their planning. The mean results for all four skills in thecategory“coursebooks”makeup79,68%ofalltheanswers.Conversely,coursebookunitsdidnotseemtobeadrivingforceforplanning.88,9%ofallanswerssuggestthatteachersusedcoursebookunitsasthebasisfortheir planning in less than half of their lessons to none of them.With 73,1% and 75% E8 standards andmaterialsweresimilarlyinfrequentlyusedforplanning.Topicsthatareinterestingforlearnersseemtobeasunpopular as E 8 standards or E8 materials for planning. 75,9% of the teachers said that they would planaccordingtolearnerinterestinlessthanhalfthelessonstonone.
InplanninglessonsImakeuseof….(answersin%)
never
inafewlessons
inlessthan
halfthelessons
inabouthalfthelessons
inmorethanhalfofthe
lessons
inmostlessons
innearlyeverylesson
Teacher'shandbook 1,10 20,50 13,60 34,10 2,30 15,90 12,50Coursebookunits 26,50 31,60 30,80 6,80 1,70 2,70 0,00E8standards 26,30 31,50 15,30 23,10 3,80 0,00 0,00E8materials 25,90 33,00 16,10 7,10 9,80 5,40 2,70Activities 16,70 26,30 21,90 21,10 7,00 4,40 2,60Topicsinterestingforlearners 19,00 32,80 24,10 17,20 5,20 0,90 0,90Lexicalfields 8,00 15,00 25,70 25,70 12,40 7,10 6,20Grammaritems 7,00 23,50 27,80 20,90 8,70 7,00 5,20Coursebook-listening 0,00 2,50 3,10 3,70 11,10 41,40 38,30Coursebook-reading 0,60 2,30 2,30 9,40 19,90 30,40 35,10Coursebook-speaking 0,70 7,70 7,70 13,30 24,50 21,70 24,50Coursebook-writing 0,00 3,80 9,00 15,40 17,90 26,30 27,60Publishedmaterials-listening 10,50 24,80 18,30 15,00 11,80 17,00 2,60Publishedmaterials-reading 0,60 12,90 17,60 24,10 20,00 18,80 5,90Publishedmaterials-speaking 3,60 15,80 17,30 20,90 16,50 20,10 5,80Publishedmaterials-writing 1,90 14,10 14,10 23,10 19,20 20,50 7,10Ownmaterial-listening 40,30 28,60 9,70 4,50 7,10 5,80 3,90Ownmaterial-reading 7,00 20,30 18,00 16,90 15,70 15,70 6,40Ownmaterial-speaking 6,30 16,90 12,00 17,60 14,10 23,90 9,20Ownmaterial-writing 7,20 14,40 12,40 18,30 17,00 16,30 14,40Authenticmaterial-listening 18,20 29,90 13,00 15,60 9,10 9,70 4,50Authenticmaterial-reading 3,60 22,50 20,70 16,60 20,10 10,70 5,90Authenticmaterial-speaking 9,10 17,40 18,20 14,40 17,40 16,70 6,80
6
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Reading Listening Speaking Wriung Grammar
Quest2009 19.21 16.52 24.83 18.62 19.90
Quest2012-14 21.50 18.20 30.30 10.00 20.00
Obs2012-14 21.10 17.50 22.80 21.60 17.00
0.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.0030.0035.00
%
Authenticmaterial-writing 6,00 24,80 18,10 17,40 14,80 13,40 5,40ModernMedia-listening 9,40 24,50 13,80 13,80 18,20 13,20 6,90ModernMedia-reading 5,80 27,90 16,30 15,10 16,90 14,00 4,10ModernMedia-speaking 11,90 27,60 14,90 16,40 11,90 11,90 5,20ModernMedia-writing 13,90 25,80 16,60 18,50 7,90 9,30 7,90
Table1:Whatteachersmakeuseofwhenplanningtheirlessons(answersin%)Inadditiontocoursebooks,publishedmaterialswerequitefrequentlyusedforplanningreading,speakingandwriting by the responding teachers in 2009. Planning for listeningwas hardly ever guidedbymaterial otherthan course books.What seems also striking is the infrequent use ofModernMedia for planning teaching.AbouthalfoftheanswerssuggestaminorroleofModernMediaintheplanningEFLlessons.
Observationdrewacompletelydifferentpicturetenyearslater.Ofthe95observedlessons,28madeuseofpublishedE8teachingmaterialsorpublishedE8testingmaterials.Another5teachersusedpublishedmaterialfocussingonthetasktypesused inE8testing intheir lessons. Inthe interviews,nearlyall teacherssaidtheywouldplantheirlessonswithstandarddescriptorsinmindandtheywouldregularlyusematerialspublishedontheBIFIEwebpageinordertopreparetheirpupilsforthetests. Inthesameveintheycomplainedaboutthelackoffocusoncan-descriptors,strategiesandformativefeedbackincoursebooks,especiallyinthereceptiveskills.
The analysis of teaching time according to the four skills, based on two surveys and on classroomobservation,suggeststhatheteachershavereducedtheteachingtimeforwritingdrasticallyfrom18%in2009to10%between2012and2014.Theteachingtimeforspeakingincreasedfromabout25%to30%inthesameperiod.Observationsandpost-observationinterviewsshowedalackintheassessmentofspeaking.Onlyoneschool had initiated the systematic assessment of speakingwith the help of a native speaker assistantwhowouldtakepairsofpupilsoutoftheclassroomsonaregularbasistoassesstheirspokeninteraction.
Theteachingtimeforreadingandlisteningalsoincreasedbetween2009and2014,whilethetimeusedfortheteachingofgrammarnearlystayedthesame.Mostoftheobservedlessonsdeliveredabalancedpictureofteaching time, i.e. teachers follow curricular guidelines andput equal emphasis on all four skills. If teachinggrammar, however, is added to writing, there is a clear surplus for this skill which is also reflected in thecontributionofwritingtothefinalgrade(seeFigures3and4).
Fig.3:Teachingtimein%
Although the surveys carried out between 2012 and 2014 suggested that E8 testing of speaking andstandardisation had created positive washback on classroom assessment, post-observation interviews anddocumentresearchcontradictedthisinformation.Teacherstalkedalotaboutthedifficultiesintheassessmentof speaking and how cumbersome it was. Hardly any teachers reported about testing speaking or itscontribution to the pupils’ final grades. Nevertheless, compared to the 2009 survey, where writing andgrammarmade up 93% of the final grade and where listening or reading only receivedminimal attention,positivewashback towards amore homogeneous contribution of all fours skills to the final grade could beobservedin2014(seeFigure4).
7
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Fig.4:Contributionofthe4skillstothefinalgradein%
Intheanalysisofteachingandlearning,datafromthe2009questionnairessuggeststhatteachershadnotyetchangedtheirteachinginreactiontostandardisationorstandardisedtesting.Inthelatersurveysin2012and2014aswellasinpost-observationinterviewsonly25%saidthattheyhadchanged“whattheyteach”,i.e.thecontent. 20%of the teachers reported that theyhadnot changed theirmethodsor strategies andanevenbigger number, namely 70% of the teachers, said that they had not changed their testing in response tostandardisedtesting,either.Thus,thewashbackhypotheses3and4,namelythat“[a]testwillinfluencewhatteachersteach[and]….howteachersteach”(Alderson&Wall,1993,p.117)hadtoberejectedforthepresentsample.Sinceonly16,7%ofthepupilshadcrossedthattheyhadchangedtheirlearningbecauseofE8testing,andnonehadsaidthattheywouldfeelmotivatedtolearnbyE8Standardsortesting,hypotheses2,6and11werealsodeemeduntrueforthequestionedsample.
Fig.5:TheimpactofE8testsonwhatandhowteachersteach,howtheytest,howpupilslearnandpupilmotivation.
Theanalysesofpost-observationinterviewsgeneratedvariouscategoriesandtrendswhichsuggesta“positiveattitudetowardsE8shownbytrainedwritingratersorspeakinginterlocutorsandassessors”.Trainedwritingratersusetheratingscalesinclassroomtestingandsomeofthempresentedthekindofdiagnosticfeedbackthey give to any written text or assignment. Trained teachers also teach and test speaking using thestandardisedtestformatmorefrequentlythantheiruntrainedcolleagues.However,teachersreportedaboutthelackofmaterialsforspeakingbecausethecoursebooksdidnotofferanysuitableones.Themostpressingneedphrasedbytheinterviewedteachers,however,stemsfromthefactthatthecurriculumisgeneral in itsdescriptionsofgoalsandthatteacherslackdetailedlistsofdescriptorsforyears5-8.DoingthisontheirownwasconsideredanoverwhelmingtaskalthoughespeciallyNMSteachersfeltthattheyhadtodosoinorderto
Reading Listening Speaking Wriung GrammarQuest2009 3.10 2.10 1.23 65.20 28.37
Quest2012-14 16.80 17.60 31.80 15.00 18.80
Obs2012-14 17.50 10.30 19.70 41.10 11.40
0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.0070.00
%
…whatIteach
…howIteach
…howItest
…howpupilslearn
…pupilmouvauon
true 31.4 26.8 11 16.7 0.00
mostlytrue 26.5 27.7 1.3 6.8 5.45
somewhattrue 21.6 35.1 9.5 7.55 25.30
nottrue 3.4 8.2 65.2 23.4 30.90
010203040506070
%
8
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
beabletoprovidesufficientinformationaboutgoalstopupilsandparents.TeacherswhohadnotattendedanyE8trainingortakenpartinthepilotingofE8standardsreportedthey
wouldonlyusepublishedtestfoldersfortestdesign.Theysaidthattheywouldhardlyeveraddtheirownideastoavailableclassroomtestmaterials.NeitherteachersnorheadteachersbelievedthatpupilswouldbeawareofE8standards.Thus,theyweredoubtfulaboutadeliberatechangeinpupils’attitudethoughstandardisationorE8testing.Thisopinionphrasedininterviewsbyteacherswasconfirmedinthequestionnairesansweredbyparentsandpupils.
The least impactwasdescribed tohavehappened in the teachingof readingand listening.Although theteaching time had increased in both skills, teachers did not sufficiently focus their learners on reading orlisteningasskillsoronstrategiesthatmightimprovetheirperformance.OnlyteachersinASS,whowerealsofamiliarwiththetestformatsofthenewMaturaexam,madeeffortstoteachreadingorlisteninginastrategicwayandtocreateawarenessfortheireffectsintheirpupils.
5 ConclusionConcludingitcanbesaidthatstandardisedtestingandanewlyadaptedcurriculumhavecausedwashbackinAustrianEFLclassrooms.UsingWatanabe’s fivedimensionstodescribethiswashback itcanbesaidthat thewashbackisspecific,strongandpositiveinthecurrentpracticeofteachingofspeaking.Teachershavenotonlyincreased the teaching time for speaking, they have also adopted the format of the speaking test and thuscreatedmoreopportunitiesfortheirpupilstocommunicatewitheachother.Asfarastheotherthreeskillsareconcerned,thewashbackisalsospecificbutweakatthesametime.Severalcoursebooksarealreadymakinguseofthestandardisedpromptformatseffectivelybuttheydonotsupportteachingorlearningstrategiesthatwouldencouragepeer-writingorpeer-assessmentordecreasethenumberofgap-fillingexercisestoincreasewritingattextlevel.
Teacherswhodonotteachinuppersecondaryclassesfailtoexplicitlyteachreadingorlisteningstrategies.Their practice of treating reading and listening tasks as mere input which does not require any structuredoutputorstrategyusecannotbeconsideredpositivewashbackfromE8testingorstandardisation.However,itmust be said that the so-called “Dynamic Competences”, which are aiming at strategy use and thedevelopmentofmetacognitiveskills,arenotsufficientlyknownorimplemented.
Thus,theintendedwashbackofE8testingonclassroompracticehasnotbeenfullyachieved.Assessmentliteracy has only increasedwith trained raters, where thewashback can be considered strong, but has notreachedthemajorityofteacherswithoutratertraining.
Themotivationofpupilsthroughstandardisedtestinghasbeenpositivewiththosepupilswhoweretestedinspeakingbutnearlyalltheotherpupilssaidthattheyhadratherdislikedthetestandthelongandstressfulmorning.Finally,thewashbackonthepupils’attitudetowardslearninghastobeconsideredtheweakest.
ThefollowingconcludingstatementsverbalisetheanalysisinTable2:
-Standardsandstandardisedtestinghaveincreasedtheamountandqualityofteachingspeaking;yetspeakingisnotseriouslytestedorpartofthefinalgrade.-Teacherswhodonotteachupperlevelclassesarenotawareofreadingorlisteningstrategies–theydonotteachthemandpupilshaveproblemswithtasksthatrequirestrategyuse,especiallywithinferencing.-Mostteachersarenotawareoftexttypesorhowtoteachskillsnecessarytoproducethemeffectively.-Coursebooksandtestfoldersdonotsupportexplicitinstructionofstrategiesorlinguisticmeanstogoabouttasksstrategically.-Pupilsandparentsfeelfrustratedbytheslowfeedback–moreimmediatefeedbackshouldbeconsidered.Otherwisetheywillnotseeanyreasontochangelearningbecauseofstandardsorstandardisedtestinginthefuture.-Testinginschoolshasnotchanged;itstilloveremphasiseswriting,especiallythroughgap-fillingtasks;textwritingisoftenbasedonpromptsthatresemblethetestformatbutthatdonotrequirehigherlevelthinking.-ChangesinattitudetowardsteachingandlearningofEFLseldombecamevisibleinobservedlessons.-Thepotentialcompetenceorientationthatcouldbeachievedthroughstandardsandstandardisedtestingmightbewastedifitisnotmademoreexplicitandconsciousinthefuture.Thiscanbeachievedthroughmoreexplicitandstrategicinputandmoreimmediatefeedbackbeforethepupilsleaveschoolsorgointosummerholidays.((Mewald,2015,pp.40-41)
9
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Watanabe’sfivedimensions(1997) Shohamy’s criteria (1993)
Specifity.generalvs.specific
Intensity.strongvs.weak
Length.shortvs.long
Intentionalityunintendedvs.
intended
Valuepositivevs.negative
washbackeffect general:courseandtestmaterialsarenotspecificenoughtocreatespecificwashback
weak:testislow-stakes;pupilsarenotawareofstandards,theydonotbenefitdirectlyfromthefeedbackofE8testingandtheyloseinterestinitsresults
long:standardshavebeenlegallyenacted
intended:legalenactment
positivewheretraininghasreachedteachers;nonegativeeffectsreported;neutralwhereithasnot
measurement-driveninstruction
specific:E8testingisbasedontestconstructsthatdefinecompetencesandusesclearassessmentcriteria
weak:classroomtestinghasnotchanged;itdoesnotdrivelearningeffectivelybutstillremainsalienatedfromlearning
long:classroomtestingmayimprovefromrepeatedE8tests
intended:testingmaterialsareavailableandusedbyteachers
positive:assessmentliteracywilleventuallyimproveclassroomtesting
curriculumalignment
specific:curriculumhaschangedtousecan-dodescriptorsandCEFRlevels
weak:curriculumchangehasnotyetreachedschoolbooks–notcompletelyalignedwithstandards&CEFRdescriptorsingoalsetting;teacherslackorientation
long:curriculumwillstaythesameandsowillstandardsdescriptors
intended:curriculum,standardsandtestconstructsarealigned
positive:alignmenthastakenplacesimultaneously
systemicvalidity general:needtodemonstratethattheintroductionofE8testingcanimprovelearning
weak:teachers’assessmentliteracyrequiressupport
long:teachers’assessmentliteracywilldevelop
intended:teachereducationhasdiscoveredassessmentliteracyasagoal
positive:growingassessmentliteracywillimproveclassroomtestingandassessment
Table2:Washbackinfivedimensionsbasedonthreecriteria
10
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
6 Limitations,ethicalconsiderationsandoutlook
Although the results presented in this paper rely on a relatively large sample and ample observation inclassrooms,thereare limitationsto itsgeneralisability.Anydatapresentedinthisstudystemsfromteacherswhohavecontributedvoluntarilytothesurveys,interviewsandobservations.
Teachers had opened their classrooms to the research upon invitation and they were committed andpositive towards competency based education. None of the schools or teachers had negative feelings orattitudestowardsstandardsorE8testing.Thus,ithastobeacknowledgedthatthestudyhadaimedatfindingwashback.Still,itwasnotdeterminedonlytoseethepositivewashbackbutalsotobecriticalifneeded.
Allparticipantshadbeeninformedabouttheirrighttowithdrawfromtheresearchatanytime.Noneoftheteachersdid.Onthecontrary,someofferedrepeatedvisits;thiswasespeciallyimportantwhennewchangesthrough the implementationof theNMSbecameoneof the research interests.Comingback to schoolsandengaging inaprofessionalexchangebroughtaboutgivingthedocuments intheappendix inexchangetothetaking away of information, impressions and valuable new ideas for teacher education. Thus, the lists ofdescriptors for years 5 to 8, based on the CEFR and the Austrian portfolios, are the product of an ongoingdebatewithteachersabouttheneedtomakeplanningmoretargetedandableto informpupilsaboutgoalsandachievements.Moreover,thelistoftexttypeswasintendedtoprovidestimuliforvariedtextproductionwhich is still rather limited in scope inmost coursebooks. Finally, the rating scalesweredeveloped tohelpteacherswithoutlongandprofessionaltrainingtoimplementcriterionorientedassessmentintheirclassroomsandtoencourageself-andpeer-assessmentwiththeirlearners.Itishopedthatwiththiscontributionresearchandclassroompracticehavecreatedwhatwasintendedtobepositivewashbackoneachother’spractice.
ReferencesAlderson,C.J.,&Wall,D.(1993).Doeswashbackexist?AppliedLinguistics,14,pp.115-29.Auerbach,E.(1986).Competency-basedESL:onestepforwardortwostepsback?TESOLQuaterly,20(3),pp.
411-430.Bachman,L.,&Palmer,A.(2010).LanguageAssessmentinPractice.Oxford:OUP.BIFIE(Ed.).(2011-2014a).KompetenzenundModelle.Retrieved0310,2014,from
https://www.bifie.at/node/49BIFIE(Ed.).(2012).HandbuchzurStandardüberprüfunginEnglisch,8.Schulstufe.RetrievedAugust20,2014,
fromBIFIE:https://www.bifie.at/system/files/dl/bist-ue_Handbuch-Standardueberpruefung-E8_20130204.pdf
BIFIE.(2014).BildungsstandardsMuster-RückmeldungSchulberichtIEnglisch8.Schulstufe.(BIFIE,Ed.)RetrievedAugust20,2014,fromBIFIE:https://www.bifie.at/system/files/dl/BiSt-UE_RM_E8_Schulbericht_I_20140131.pdf
BIFIE.(2014).Standardüberprüfung2013.Englisch,8.Schulstufe.Bundesergbnisbericht.Salzburg:BIFIE.BIFIE&ÖSZ(Ed.).(2011).Praxishandbuch.BildungsstandardsfürFremdsprachen(Englisch)8.Schulstufe.Graz:
Leykam.Black,P.,&William,D.(1998).Insidetheblackbox:Raisingstandardsthroughclassroomassessment.PhiDelta
Kappan80(2),pp.139-148.BMBF(Ed.).(2008).LehrplanLebendeFremdsprache.Retrieved0320,2014,from
http://www.bmukk.gv.at/medienpool/16682/bgbl_nr_ii_210_2008.pdfBMBF(Ed.).(2009).VerordnungderBundesministerinfürUnterricht,KunstundKulturüberBildungsstandards
imSchulwesenStF:BGBl.IINr.1/2009.Retrieved0310,2014,fromhttp://www.bmukk.gv.at/medienpool/24598/vo_bildungsstandards2013anl.pdf
BMBF.(2016).LehrplanLebendeFremdsprache.(BMUKK,Editor)Retrieved0320,2014,fromhttps://www.bmbf.gv.at/schulen/unterricht/lp/ahs8_782.pdf?4dzgm2
BMUKK.(2009).VerordnungderBundesministerinfürUnterricht,KunstundKulturüberBildungsstandardsimSchulwesenStF:BGBl.IINr.1/2009.(BMUKK,Ed.)Retrieved0310,2014,fromhttp://www.bmukk.gv.at/medienpool/24598/vo_bildungsstandards2013anl.pdf
Brumfit,C.,&Johnson,K.(1979).TheCommunicativeApproachtoLanguageTeaching.Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Canale,M.,&Swain,M.(1980).Theoreticalbasesofcommunicativeapproachestosecondlanguageteachingandtesting.AppliedLinguistics,1,pp.1-47.
11
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Cheng,L.(2005).ChangingLanguageTeachingthroughLanguageTesting.Cambridge:CUP.Cheng,L.,Watanabe,Y.,&Curtis,A.(Eds.).(2004).WashbackinLanguageTesting:ResearchContextsand
Methods.Mahwah:LaurenceErlbaum&Associates.CouncilofEurope,E.(Ed.).(2001).CommonEuropeanFrameworkofReferenceforLanguages:Learning,
teaching,assessment.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.Feig,A.D.,&Alison,S.(Eds.).(2011).QualitativeEnquiryinGeoscienceEducationResearch(Vol.SpecialPaper
474).Boulder:TheGoelogicalSocietyAmerica.Gassner,O.,Horak,A.,Mewald,C.,Moser,W.,Schober,M.,Stefan,F.,&Valsky,C.(2005).Bildungsstandardsin
Österreich.Fremdsprachen.Englisch8.Schulstufe.VersionSeptember‘05.Wien:bmbwk.Green,A.(2007).IELTSWashbackinContext.Cambridge:CUP.Hymes,D.H.(1972).Oncommunicativecompetence.InJ.Pride,&J.Holmes(Eds.),Sociolinguistics:selected
readings.(pp.269–293).Harmondsworth:Penguin.Johnson,D.W.,&Johnson,R.T.(2009).AnEduactionalPsychologySuccessStory:SocialInterdependence
TheoryandCooperativeLearning.EducationalResearcher,38(5),pp.365-379.Linn,R.L.,&Gronlund,N.E.(2000).Measurementandassessmentinteaching(8thed.).UpperSaddleRiver:
PrenticeHall.Lovelock,C.(1996).ThePost-PPPDebate:analternativemodel?TheTeacherTrainer,2(6),pp.3-6.Mewald,C.(2014a).Competencybasedforeignlanguageeducation:Trainingtips1.BildungsstandardsEnglisch
8:UnterrichtsvideosundBegleitmaterialien.(BIFIE,Ed.)Salzburg.Mewald,C.(2014b).Planningcompetencybasedforeignlanguagelessons.BildungsstandardsEnglisch8.
UnterrichtsvideosundBegleitmaterialien.Salzburg:BIFIE.Mewald,C.(2015).Theimpactofstandardisedtestingonclassroomteachingandtestinginlowersecondary
foreignlanguageeducactioninAustria:amixedmethodstudy.InS.Dawadi,J.Mader,&Z.Urkun(Ed.),Languagetesting:Currenttrendsandfutureneeds.Granada:IATEFL(TEASIG).
Nunan,D.(1991).CommunicativeTasksandtheLanguageCurriculum.TESOLQuarterly,25(2),pp.279–295.Richards,J.C.,&Rogers,T.S.(2014).ApproachesandMethodsinLanguageTeaching(Vol.SecondEdition).
Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.Shohamy,E.(1993).Thepoweroftests:Theimpactoflanguagetestsonteachingandlearning.NFLCOccasinal
Paper.Washington:NationalForeignLanguageCenter.Stiggins,R.,Arter,J.,Chappuis,J.,&Chappuis,S.(2006).ClassroomAssessmentforStudentLearning.DoingIt
Right-UsingItWell.Portland:EducationalTestingService.Strauss,A.,&Corbin,J.(1990).BasicsofQualitativeResearch:GroundedTheoryProceduresandTechniques.
NewburyPark:SagePublications.Strauss,A.,&Corbin,J.(1998).BasicsofQualitativeResearch.TechniquesandProceduresforDeveloping
GroundedTheory.ThousandOaks,CA:SagePublications.Swain,M.(1985).Large-scalecommunicativetesting:Acasestudy.InY.Lee,A.C.Fok,R.Lord,&G.Low,New
directionsinlanguagetesting(pp.35-36).Oxford:PergamonPress.Swain,M.(2000).Theoutputhypothesisandbeyond:Mediatingacquisitionthroughcollaborativedialogue.In
J.P.Lantolf,SocioculturalTheoryandSecondLanguageLearning(pp.97-115).Oxford:OxfordUniversityPress.
Wall,D.(2005).Theimpactofhigh-staketestingonteachingandlearning.Cambridge:CUP.Cambridge:CUP.Watanabe,Y.(1997).WashbackeffectsoftheJapaneseentranceexamination:Classroom-basedresearch.
LancasterUniversity:Unpublisheddoctoraldissertation.Wiggins,G.,&McTighe,J.(2005).UnderstandingbyDesign.Alexandria,VA:Pearson.
12
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
AppendixThe following descriptors have been adapted fromCEFRdescriptors following the suggestedpractice of theframework.TheCEFRintendsto“beopenandflexible,sothatitcanbeapplied,withsuchadaptationsasprovenecessary, to particular situations” (Council of Europe, 2001, p. 7). Moreover, descriptors in EuropeanLanguage Portfolios, such as the ESP Mittelstufe(http://www.oesz.at/sprachenportfolio/schueler.php?page=S1000)wereconsideredinthedevelopmentofthefollowingcollectionofdescriptorsforEFLinyears5-8.DESCRIPTORSFORLISTENINGYear5(inputtextswillmostlybeatA1–A2level)Canunderstandfamiliarwords,phrasesandsimplesentencesconcerningthemselvesandtheirsurroundings,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport(e.g.mime,gesture).Canunderstandsimpleinstructionsarticulatedcarefullyandslowly,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandmainideasandovertinformation/detailsinconversationswhicharecarefullyarticulated,withpausestoassimilatemeaning,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandwordsandnumbersthatarespelttothem.Canunderstandthemainideas,overtinformation/detailsandovertspeakerattitudeinverysimpletexts(e.g.stories,reports,songs…)thataresuitablefortheirage,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandthesocialorsituationalcontextinsimpleconversations,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandmainideas,simpledirectionsandhowtogetfromXtoY,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.CanunderstandthegistofTVprogrammesorfilmsthatareeasytounderstandandthataresuitablefortheirage.Caninferbasicunderlyinginformationfromsimpleconversations(e.g.simpleindirectrequests:It’shotinhere!-requesttoopenthewindow)Canunderstandmaininformationandspecificdetailsinpersonalconversations,phonecalls,instructions,routinecommands,time-tableannouncements,songs,poems,stories,andshortclassroompresentations/conversations.Year6(inputtextscanbeatA1–A2level;veryshortB1inputtextscanbeusedifthetaskisverysimple)Cancatchthemainpointsofeverydayconversations,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.CanunderstandsimpledirectionsandhowtogetfromXtoY.Canunderstandsimplemessagesandannouncementsiftheyareaudibleandclearanddistinguishthemfromsupportingdetail.Canidentifythetopicandthegistofsimplefact-basedinformation(news)ordiscussions(e.g.ontheradioorTV).Canunderstandspecificinformation/detailsinsimplefictionalandnon-fictionaltextsthataresuitablefortheirage,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandthemainideaandmostovertsimpleinformation/detailsinstories,sketches,dialogues,eventhoughtheydonotknowallofthewords,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canidentifythesituationalcontextinconversations,eventhoughtheydonotknowallofthewords.Canunderstandovertspeakerattitudeinstories,sketches,dialogues,eventhoughtheydonotknowallofthewords,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport(e.g.mimeandgesture,bodylanguage).Canunderstandsimplelyricseventhoughtheydonotknowallofthewordswhentheyhavetheopportunitytolistenmorethanonceandaregivenvisualsupport.Canunderstandmaininformationandspecificdetailsininterviews,anecdotes,travelaccounts,exerciseinstructions,simpletechnicaldescriptions,recipes,sportscommentaries,news,andlongerclassroompresentations/conversations.Year7(inputtextsatA1-B1levelandsuitableauthenticsourcescanbeused)Canunderstandthemainideasandspecificdetailsinuncomplicatedtextsthataresuitablefortheirageanddistinguishimportantinformationfromsupportingdetails.
13
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Canunderstandthemainideaandspecificdetails/informationinconversationsabouttopicsofimmediateneed(forexamplefamily,friends,hobbiesetc.).Canunderstandthemainpoints/informationinspeechthatisclearlyarticulatedaboutfamiliartopicsanddistinguishimportantinformationfromsupportingdetails.Canidentifyspeakerattitudeandsituationalcontextinconversations,eventhoughtheydonotknowallofthewords.Canunderstandovertinformationaboutfamiliartopicsandinferconsequentialunderlyingmeaning/information,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canfollowaudio-orvideorecordedinput/filmandidentifyspeakerattitudeifgivenvisualsupport.Canfollowinstructionsforeverydayequipmentoractivities,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandlyricseventhoughtheydonotknowallofthewordswhentheyhavetheopportunitytolistentothemmorethanonce.Canunderstandmaininformationandspecificdetailsandidentifyattitudinalandcontextualcluesinurbanlegends,simplifiedreaders,documentaries,simpletalks,bookreportsorsketchesappropriatefortheirageandlevel.Year8(inputtextsatA1-B1levelandsuitableauthenticsourcescanbeused)Canunderstandgist/mainideasandimportantdetail/informationintextsthataresuitablefortheirage.Canfollowdiscussionsaboutfamiliartopicsisabletounderstandthemainpoints,argumentsandspeakerattitudewhenstandardlanguageisused.Canunderstandpersonalconversationsonfamiliartopics,identifyspeakerattitude,situationalcontextandunderlyingmessagesiftheyareclearlylinkedtoexplicitlystatedideas/details.Canunderstandsimpletechnicalinformation,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canfollowdetaileddescriptionsofthewayoreverydaytechnicalequipmentintheirfieldsofinterest.Canfollowaudio-orvideorecordedinput/filmandidentifyspeakerattitude.Canfollowaudio-orvideorecordedinput/filmandunderstandstraightforward,concreteinformationandsituationalcontext.Canunderstandfactualinformationaboutfamiliartopicseveninmorecomplexinputtexts,especiallyifgivenvisualsupport.Canunderstandmaininformationandspecificdetailsandidentifyattitudinalandcontextualcluesinshortstories,youngadultliterature,jokes,simplelectures,moviesortheatreplaysappropriatefortheirageandlevel.DESCRIPTORSFORREADINGYear5(inputtextswillmostlybeatA1–A2level)Canunderstandfamiliarwordsandverysimplesentences(forexampleinnotices,posters,cataloguesetc.),especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandsimpleinstructionsandrules(e.g.classroomsrules,instructionsfortasks),especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandthegist/mainmessageofsimplestoriesandfactbasedtextsaboutfamiliartopics,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandconcreteinformationinsimplestoriesandfactbasedtextsaboutfamiliartopics,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandconcreteinformationinletters,e-mails,postcards,magazinearticles,web-pagesandshortsketchesifsimplelanguageissupportedbyvisuals.Canunderstandsimpleinstructionsandnotices(e.g.publicplaces,streets,shops…),especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canfollowshort,simplewrittendirections,forexampleunderstanddescriptionsofthewayfromXtoY,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandthesettingandthefunctionofsimpletexts.Canusecontentpagestofindtexteffectively.Canusewordlistsorpicturedictionariestofindthemeaningofunknownwords.Canuseglossariestounderstandthemeaningofunknownwords.
14
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Canunderstandthelogicalorganizationofatext:headline,beginning,middle,endifclearlymarked.Canunderstandreferencesinatext(e.g.throughpronouns:this,that,these,those,he,she,it,they,we…).Canidentifyparagraphsbasedonideaunits.Canidentifysimpleandfamiliartexttypes:e.g.letters,e-mails,stories,poems,fables,newspaperreports(weather),signs/notices,instructions…CanenjoyverysimplegradedreadersatA1level.Year6(inputtextscanbeatA1–A2level;veryshortB1inputtextscanbeusedifthetaskisverysimple)Canunderstandconcreteinformationinshort,simpletextsandspecific,predictableinformationinsimpleeverydaymaterial(forexampleadvertisements,prospectuses,menus,timetablesetc.)anddistinguishitfromsupportingdetail.Canreadforgisttoidentifythemainideaofatextandapplyskimmingandscanningstrategiestofindovertpre-specifiedinformationquickly.Canunderstandconcreteinformationinpersonalletters,e-mails,shortmessages,diaryentries,sketchesand(role-)playsiftheycontainthehighestfrequencyvocabulary.Canunderstandeverydaysigns,instructionsandnotices(forexampleinpublicplaces,suchasstreets,restaurants,schools,shoppingmalls,railwaystations,onpublictelephonesandscreensetc.).CanunderstandconcreteinformationinstoriesandfactbasedtextsaboutfamiliartopicsatA2level.Canuseindexestofindinformationeffectively.Canusebilingualdictionariestofindthemeaningofuncomplicatedunknownwords.Canunderstandthelogicalorganizationofatext,i.e.canidentifyheadings,sub-headings.Canidentifykeysentencesinparagraphs,especiallyinnon-fictionaltexts.Canenjoysimplegradedreaders(A1-A2).Canidentifylessfamiliartexttypes:e.g.notes,fairytales,diaryentries,magazinearticles,signs,timetables,food/medicinelabels,instructions,reports,menus,recipes…Year7(inputtextsatA1-B1levelandageappropriateauthentictextscanbeused)Canunderstandconcreteinformationwhichdependsonhighfrequencyeverydaylanguageinshort,simpletextsonfamiliarmattersanddistinguishitfromsupportingdetail.Canunderstandconcreteinformationinstandardroutineletters,e-mailsorfaxes:enquiries,ordersandlettersofconfirmationonfamiliartopics.Canfindandunderstandrelevantinformationanddistinguishmainpointsfromsupportingdetailinsimpleeverydaymaterial,onfamiliarsubjects(forexampleletters,brochures,prospectuses,advertisements,shortofficialdocumentsetc.).Canunderstandregulations,forexampleconcerningsafetyinpublicplacesoronplanes,trainsorthesubway,whenexpressedineveryday(non-technical)language.CanunderstandconcreteinformationandinfersimpleunderlyingmessagesinfictionalandfactbasedtextsaboutfamiliartopicsatA2–B1level.Canfindpre-specifiedinformationquicklyandeffectivelyfromarangeofdifferenttexts.Canusemonolingualdictionariestofindthemeaningofunknownwords,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.Canunderstandthelogicalorganizationofatext:headings,sub-headings,forwardandbackwardreferencing.Canidentifytopicsentencesinparagraphs,especiallyinnon-fictionaltexts.Canidentifymosttexttypes:personal,publicandprofessional(=school)domain.Canenjoyextensivereadingoflongernon-fictionaltexts,gradedreaders(B1)andauthenticyoungadultliteraturewhengivenguidance.Canidentifylessfamiliartexttypes:e.g.simplifiedreaders/youngadultliterature:crime,sciencefiction,loveandromance,travelreports,urbanlegends,newspaperarticles,book/filmreviews,factualreports,guides,referencebooks(science,nature,arts&crafts,house&home,health…),biographies,interviews…
Year8(inputtextsatA1-B1levelandageappropriateauthentictextscanbeused)
Canunderstandconcreteinformationandinferunderlyingmessagesintextsthatconsistmainlyofhighfrequencyeverydayorjob/school-relatedlanguageonsubjectsrelatedtothelearners’fieldsofinterest.
15
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Canunderstandthedescriptionofevents,feelings,andwishesinpersonalconversationswellenoughtoreactappropriatelytospeakerattitudeorbehaviour.Canunderstandthemainidea,specificdetailsandsituationalcontextsinsimpleliterarytexts.Canunderstandthemostovertfeelingsandattitudesofspeakersinsimpleliterarytexts.Canuseskimmingandscanningstrategiesinordertolocatedesiredinformationandgatherinformationfromdifferentpartsofatextinordertofulfilaspecifictask(e.g.selectpassagesforcarefulreadingquickly).Canrecognisethelineofargumentinashorttext,thoughnotnecessarilyindetail.Canunderstandclearlywritten,straightforwardinstructionsforapieceofequipmentoractivities(e.g.electronicdevices,gymnasticexercises…).CanunderstandstoriesandfactbasedtextsaboutfamiliartopicsatB1level,especiallyifthereisvisualsupport.CanusemonolingualdictionariestofindthemeaningofmostunknownwordsatB1level.Canidentifyconcludingsentences(justifications)inparagraphing,especiallyinnon-fictionaltexts.Canenjoylongerauthentictextsforyoungadultswhengivenguidanceintheselectionoftextsorchoosingcarefullybasedoninterestandreadiness.Canidentifylessfamiliartexttypesanddifferentiatebetweenfictionandnon-fiction:e.g.simplifiedreaders/youngadultliterature,referencebooks,travelreports,historicalnovels–historicalaccounts,safetyregulations,advertisements,forms,simplebusinessletters(letterofcomplaint,applicationsforholidayjobs/schools)…DESCRIPTORSFORSPEAKINGYear5Descriptorsfororalproduction Texttypes CommunicativefunctionsCandescribehimself/herself,familiarplaces,people,animalsandobjects(e.g.home,classroom,familyandfriends,food,clothes,petsetc.).
descriptions todescribe(tocompare)people,places,objects
Candescribeeventsandactivities(e.g.dailyroutine,birthdayparties,hobbies,sportsactivities,weather,seasonsetc.).
descriptions todescribeeventsoractivities
Cantell/retellshort,simplenarrativesorstoriesonfamiliartopics,guidedwithpictures,keywords,orphrases.
stories totellandretellpresentevents
Descriptorsforspokeninteraction Canaskfororpassonsimplepersonalinformation(e.g.familyandfriends,hobbies,pets...).
functionaldiscourse/informalconversation
toaskforandgiveinformation
Canaskaboutthingsandmakesimpletransactions(shopping,askingforthetime/well-beingetc.).
functionaldiscourse togreetanddepart,toaskforthings,tothank,toaskfor/offerhelp/attention
Canmakesimplearrangements(e.g.whereandwhentomeet,whattodoetc.).
functionaldiscourse/informalconversation
toinvite/requesttojoin
Canexpresslikesanddislikes informalconversation toexpressopinionsLinguisticcompetenceCanlinkwords,groupsofwordsorsimplesentenceswithverybasiclinearconnectorslike‘and’,‘but’or‘because’(‘then’)asasimplelistofpoints.Canuseverysimplesentencestarterslikefirst,thenoratlast(afterawhile,later,finally)tostructureatextandgiveitasenseofbeginning,middle,andend.Canuseaverysimplelearntrepertoireofwords,phrases,andstructureswithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageisusuallyclear.Startsusingverysimpleturntakingphrases(e.g.Andyou?Whataboutyou?)
Year6
16
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Descriptorsfororalproduction Texttypes Communicativefunctions*Candescribeandcompareplaces,people,animalsandobjects.
descriptions todescribeandtocomparepeople,places,objects
Candescribepasteventsandactivities(e.g.birthdayparties,festivals,holidaysetc.)andgivesimpleinstructions.
descriptions todescribepasteventsoractivities,togiveinstructions
Cantell/retellshort,simplenarrativesorstories,guidedwithpictures,keywords,orphrasesinpresentandpasttense.
stories totellandretellpresentandpastevents
Descriptorsforspokeninteraction Canaskfororpassonpersonalinformationofsomedetail(e.g.aboutfamily,friends,homeetc.)
functionaldiscourse/informalconversation
toaskforandgiveinformation
Cangetsimpleinformationabouttravel,usepublictransport:buses,trains,andtaxis,askandgivedirections,andbuytickets.
functionaldiscourse toaskfor/offerhelp,toaskfor/giveinformation
Canexpressandrespondtofeelingssuchassurprise,happiness,sadness,interestandindifference.
informalconversation
toexpressfeelings,attitudes,opinions
Canmakeandrespondtoinvitationsandapologies. informalconversation
toinvite,toapologise
LinguisticcompetenceCanuseasimplelearntrepertoireofwords,phrasesandstructureswithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageisusuallyclear.Startsusinglexicalandgrammaticalelementsindependentlyandcreatively(withlesscontrol).Cancreatesimplesentencelevelcohesionthroughconjunctionslike‘or’,‘if’,‘when’or‘where’(for,since,if,while,before...),reference(pronouns,demonstratives,comparatives),orsubstitution(one/ones).Canusesimplephrasesforbasicturntaking(e.g.Whatdoyouthink?Ithinksotoo.Iagree.).
(*)year5functionssupplementedby...Year7Descriptorsfororalproduction Texttypes Communicativefunctions*Canaskfororpassondetailedpersonalinformation. functionaldiscourse/
informalconversation
toaskforandgiveinformation
Cangivesimpleaccountsofexperiencesandevents. personalreport toreportaboutevents/personalexperiences
Canbrieflygivereasonsandexplanationsforopinions,plans,andactions.
personalstatement togivereasons,explanations
Cangiveashort,rehearsedpresentationonfamiliartopics.Canrespondtostraightforwardfollow-upquestions.
expositorydiscourse toreportaboutatopic
Cantell/retellnarrativesorstories,trueorinvented. stories totellandretellastory
Descriptorsforspokeninteraction Cancommunicateinsimpleroutinesituationsineverydaylife.
functionaldiscourse/informalconversation
toinitiate,maintain,andcloseaconversation;torequestaction;toexpresspreference
Candiscusswhattodoandmakeplans. argumentativediscourse
toagree/accept/disagree
Caninitiate,maintainorclosesimple,face-to-faceconversationsontopicsthatarefamiliarorofpersonalinterest.
informalconversation
toinitiate,maintainandcloseconversations
17
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
LinguisticcompetenceCanuselinkingwordslike‘firstly’,‘lastly’or‘finally’(‘inaddition’,‘afterall’)tosequenceinformation.Canuseasufficient**repertoireofwords,phrasesandstructuresindependentlybutwithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageismostlyclear.Canusearepertoireofturntakingphrases(e.g.Whatdoyouthink?Doyouagree?What’syouropinion?Ithinkso,too.Icannotagreecompletely…)
(*)year5and6functionssupplementedby...(**)sufficientreferstothetextstypesandfunctionslistedaboveandinyears5-6Year8Descriptorsfororalproduction Texttypes Communicativefunctions*Cangivedetailedaccountsofexperiences,describingfeelingsandreactions.
descriptions todescribedreams,hopes,plans,ambitions
Canpresentatopicandrespondtofollow-upquestions.
expositorydiscourse toreportaboutatopic
Cangivereasonsforopinionsandplans. personalstatement togivereasonsandexplanations
Descriptorsforspokeninteraction Canexchangerelevantinformationandgivehis/heropiniononfamiliartopics.
argumentativediscourse
toaskfor/giveinformation;toaskfor/expresspreference
Canrespondtosuggestionsandagreeanddisagreewithothers.
argumentativediscourse
toagree/accept/disagree
Cangiveorseekpersonalviewsandopinionsindiscussingtopicsofinterest;canbrieflygivereasonsandexplanations.
informaldiscussion toagree/disagree;toaskfor/expresspreference
Caninitiate,maintainandclosesimple,face-to-faceconversations.
informalconversation
toinitiate,maintainandcloseconversations
LinguisticcompetenceCanusecohesivedevicestosequenceinformation,givereasons,exemplify,orconclude,e.g.‘therefore’,‘forexample’or‘although’(‘sothat’,‘consequently’,‘asaresult’....)Canuseasufficientrepertoireofwords,phrasesandstructureswithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageisclear.Canuseawiderrepertoireofturntakingphrases(e.g.Wouldyouliketocommentonthis?Whatareyourideas….?Idon’ttrustyourarguments.Icouldnotagreemore.)
(*)year5-7functionssupplementedby...(**)sufficientreferstothetextstypesandfunctionslistedaboveandinyears5–7Texttypes-oralproduction
Features Examples
description -identifiesthephenomenon-describesitsparts,qualities,and/orcharacteristics-mostlyusespresenttense,adverbsandadjectives,orcomparisons-pasttenseisusedfordescriptionsofpastevents
descriptionsofthings,people,places,pets,pictures….
expositorydiscourse
-presentsatopicinastaticway-informationislogicallyorganisedaroundatheme-statesaproblem-presentssomearguments-offersasolution(andprobablyanevaluationofthesolution)
positiveandnegativesidesoflifeinthecountry
story/narrative -usesmainlypasttense-presentsaseriesofeventsinalinearsequence-oftenusesdirectspeechtomakethelistenersfeel,think,
trueorinventedstories,retoldstories
18
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
andshareexperiencesthroughtherealdialoguesoftheparticipants(ofteninthepresent)
personalreport -describethefeaturesofeventswithintheexperienceofthetesttakers-followastructureofwhat,when,where,withwhom,why,how-usefactstoexplainsomethingorgivedetailsaboutatopic-canbedescriptive-aremainlydeliveredinthepast-presenttensecanbeusedforritualsinthetesttakers’dailylives
reportsaboutholidays,weekends,sportsweeks,excursions,familymeetings,dailyroutines….
personalstatement -presentsapointofview-statesreasons-explainsplansorfacts-mostlyfeaturespresenttenseorfuturetense(possiblytheconditional)
futureeducation/job/life/idealplacetolive/idealpartnerorfamily/freetimeorholidaypreferencesetc.
Texttypes-spokeninteraction
Features Examples
argumentativediscourse
-speakersmaintainopposingpositionsorcomparesimilaropinions-argumentsaresharedinpersonal,socialinteraction-discussantscometoaconclusion
choosingplacesandactivitiesforholidays,sportsweeks;teenageproblemssuchaspocketmoney,goingout…
functionaldiscourse
-featuresconcretesocialfunctions-oftenstatswithandendswithgreeting-aimsatachievingacertaingoal-ismostlyinformalinnature
greetinganddeparting,expressingfeelings,makingarrangementsortransactions,gettinginformation…
informalconversation
-personalinformationisexchanged-informallanguage-speakersusuallyknoweachother
privateconversation
informaldiscussion -presentsargumentsandinformationaboutafamiliartopicfromdifferentpointsofview-phrasesarecommendationastohowtosolveaproblemorreacttoacertainsituation-moreformalthanargumentativediscourse
discussionaboutfamiliartopicsatschool
Speakingrubricyears5&6
Innovating/4.0 Applying/3.0 Developing/2.0 Beginning/1.0
TaskAchievementHoweffectivelyistheinformationconveyed?Howeffectivelyisthethemedeveloped?
-informationcommunicatedcomprehensibly-mainideaslinkedinanarrative
-informationmostlycommunicatedcomprehensibly-mainideassometimeslinked
-limitedinformation,notalwayscomprehensible-simplelistofideas
-verylittleinformation-ideaspresentedrandomly
Howeffectiveisturntaking?
-basicturntakingusingstockphrases
-beginningturntakingusing
-simplequestions -beginninguseofquestions
19
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
stockphrases
Clarity&NaturalnessofSpeechHowlongandconnectedisthespeech?Howfluentisthespeechandhownaturalarethepauses?Howcleararepronunciationandintonation?
-connectedstretchesofspeech-somedegreeoffluencyandsomepausesforplanning-pronunciationclear;veryfewmispronunciations
-beginningstretchesofspeech-beginningfluencydespiteseveralpausesforplanning-pronunciationgenerallyintelligible;occasionalmispronunciations
-shortcontributions-noticeablepausesorfalsestartssometimescausingbreakdown-pronunciationintelligible;mispronunciationssometimesimpairunderstanding
-veryshort,isolatedutterances-muchhesitationfrequentlycausingbreakdown-frequentmispronunciations;understoodwitheffort
LinguisticrangeHowvariedarelexicalelementsandgrammaticalstructures?Howwelldotheysupportthemessageandcontributetothesuccessoftheperformance?
-linguisticrangeappropriateandpurposeful;repetitionsarerare-somesimplecompoundorcomplexsentences
-linguisticrangenotcompletelyappropriate;somerepetitions-somesimplecompoundsentences
-linguisticrangesometimeslimited;frequentrepetitions-simpleisolatedsentences
-limitedlinguisticrange-mainlywordorwordgrouplevel
AccuracyHowcorrectisthelanguage?Domistakes(lexisorgrammar)impairunderstanding?
-languagegenerallycorrect-somemistakesmayoccur;noimpactoncomprehension
-languageoftencorrect-mistakeswithhardlyanyimpactoncomprehension
-languagesometimescorrect-mistakeswithsomeimpactoncomprehension
-languagecorrectenoughtobeunderstoodbyaninternationalaudience
Speakingrubricyears7&8
Innovating=4.0 Applying=3.0 Developing=2.0 Beginning=1.0
TaskAchievementHoweffectivelyistheinformationconveyed?Howeffectivelyisthethemedeveloped?
-detailedinformationcommunicatedreliably-mainideasexpandedandlinkedinanarrative
-concreteinformationcommunicatedcomprehensibly-mainideasmostlylinked
-limitedinformation,notalwayscomprehensible-simplelistofideas
-verylittleinformation-ideaspresentedrandomly
Howeffectiveisturntaking?
-effectiveturntaking(initiating,maintainingand/orclosingdiscourse)
-basicturntaking -effectiveuseofquestionsininformationexchange
-beginninguseofquestionstogetinformation
Clarity&Naturalnessof
-longerstretchesofspeech
-connectedstretchesofspeech
-shortcontributions-noticeablepauses,
-veryshort,isolatedutterances
20
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
SpeechHowlongandconnectedisthespeech?Howfluentisthespeechandhownaturalarethepauses?Howcleararepronunciationandintonation?
-fluentandspontaneouswithnaturalpauses-pronunciationandintonationclearandnatural
-somedegreeoffluencyandsomepausesforplanning-pronunciationandintonationintelligible;mispronunciationsarerare
hesitationsorfalsestartssometimescausingbreakdown-pronunciationintelligible;mispronunciationsoraccentsometimesimpairunderstanding
-muchhesitation,frequentlycausingbreakdown-frequentmispronunciations;onlyunderstoodwitheffort
LinguisticrangeHowvariedarelexicalelementsandgrammaticalstructures?Howwelldotheysupportthemessageandcontributetothesuccessofthetext?
-linguisticrangehelpstoconveymessageeffectively(i.e.choiceofwords,phrasesandstructuresmakethetextinterestingandengaging)-somevariationthroughcompoundandcomplexsentences
-linguisticrangeisappropriateandpurposeful-somecompoundorcomplexsentences
-linguisticrangesometimeslimited-somerepetitions-sentencestructuresshowlittlevariationandarerepetitive
-limitedlinguisticrange-frequentrepetitions-simplesentences
AccuracyDomistakes(lexisorgrammar)impairunderstanding?
-languagegenerallycorrect-somemistakesmayoccur;noimpactoncomprehension
-languageoftencorrect-mistakeswithhardlyanyimpactoncomprehension
-languagesometimescorrect-mistakeswithsomeimpactoncomprehension
-languagecorrectenoughtobeunderstoodbyaninternationalaudience
DESCRIPTORSFORWRITINGYear5Descriptors Texttypes CommunicativefunctionsCanwriteshort,simpletextsonfamiliartopics(e.g.home,classroom,shopping,parties,familyandfriends,seasonsandtime,food,clothes,hobbiesetc.).
informaldescriptionsorreports
todescribeand/ortocomparepeople,places,objects,activities,animals,pets
Canaskfororpassonsimplepersonaldetails(e.g.familyandfriends,hobbies,pets...).
surveys,profilesorpostingsinsocialnetworks
toaskforandgiveinformalinformationaboutpeople,places,objects,activities,pets
Canfillinsimpleinformation(e.g.numbers,dates,ownname,nationality,address,age,dateofbirthetc.).
forms toinform
Canwriteshortsimpletextsaddressedtopeopletheyknow(e.g.familyandfriends).
postcards,textmessages,letters,e-mails
toreport,tosaythanks,toinvite,togiveandaskforinformation,tokeepintouch,toexpressinterestorhope,toaskforsomethingordirections,toannounce
21
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Canwriteshort,simplenarrativesonfamiliartopics,guidedwithpictures,keywords,orphrases.
stories totellandretellpresentandpastevents
Canwriteaboutsimpleplans(e.g.inschoolmagazines,blogs…).
letters,e-mails,informalreports,articles,postingsinsocialnetworks
toinformaboutthenearfuture
LinguisticcompetenceCanlinkwords,groupsofwordsorsimplesentenceswithverybasiclinearconnectorslike‘and’,‘but’or‘because’(‘then’)asasimplelistofpoints.Canuseverysimplesentencestarterslikefirst,thenoratlast(afterawhile,later,finally)tostructureatextandgiveitasenseofbeginning,middle,andend.Canuseaverysimplelearntrepertoireofwords,phrases,andstructureswithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageisusuallyclear.
Year6Descriptors Texttypes Communicativefunctions*Canwritetextsaddressedtopeopletheyknow(e.g.family,friends,teachers,peers)
notes,textmessages,letters,e-mails
toapologise,togivereason,toaskfor/offerhelp,togiveexplanations,toinform
Canwriteshorttextsonfamiliartopics(e.g.articlesinyouthmagazines,schoolwebsite…).
informaldescription,report
toreportaboutordescribepeople,pets,places,objects,eventsorfamiliartopics,toinform
Canwritesimplenarratives. stories,fairytales,legends
toentertain
Canwritesimplelyricaltexts. poems toentertainLinguisticcompetenceCanuseasimplelearntrepertoireofwords,phrasesandstructureswithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageisusuallyclear.Startsusinglexicalandgrammaticalelementsindependentlyandcreatively(withlesscontrol).Cancreatesimplesentencelevelcohesionthroughconjunctionslike‘or’,‘if’,‘when’or‘where’(for,since,if,while,before...),reference(pronouns,demonstratives,comparatives),orsubstitution(one/ones).Canuseparagraphstostructuresimpletexts.
(*)year5functionssupplementedby...Year7Descriptors Texttypes Communicativefunctions*Canwritedetailedtextsaddressedtopeopletheyknowortoforeignpeoplebutinfamiliarsituations.
personalletters,e-mails
toreportaboutordescribeevents,experiencesandfeelings,toaskfor/giveadvice,tosympathize,tosuggest,toaskfor/giveadvice,topersuade
Canwritetextsonfamiliartopics. factualreportsordescriptions
toreportaboutordescribepeople,pets,places,events,familiartopics,personalexperiences,orfeelings,toinform
Canwriteshort,simpletextsaboutinterestingorfamouspersonalities,ifprovidedwithkeyfacts.
biographies toinform
Canwriteendingstonarrativesonfamiliartopics. stories,fables,fairytales,legends,jokes
toentertain
22
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
Canwriteshorttextsaboutbooks/storiesorfilms. summaries,reviews toinform,toexpresspreference/opinion,todescribefeelings
Candescribesimpleeverydayobjectsandprocesses. factualdescription,processesdescription
togiveinformation/directions/instructions
LinguisticcompetenceCancreatesimpleparagraphlevelcohesionanduseslinkingwordslike‘firstly’,‘lastly’or‘finally’(‘inaddition’,‘afterall’)tosequenceinformation.Canuseasufficient**repertoireofwords,phrasesandstructuresindependentlybutwithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageismostlyclear.
(*)year5and6functionssupplementedby...(**)sufficientreferstothetextstypesandfunctionslistedaboveandinyears5-6Year8Descriptors Texttypes Communicativefunctions*Canwriteconnectedtextsonfamiliartopics. factualdescriptions,
reports,explanation,articlesinyouthmagazine
toreportaboutordescribepeople,pets,places,events,personalexperiences,feelings,reactions,wishes,orfutureplans,toinform,todeclareposition,toexpressopinion,togivereasons/explanations
Canwritenarratives,trueorinvented. stories,fables,legends,fairytales,jokes
toentertain
Canwritenotesforshort,simplepresentationsontopicsofinterest.
mindmaps,notes togiveinformation/directions/instructions,todeclareposition,toexpressopinions/feelings/attitudes
CanwritelettersofapplicationincludingaCV(e.g.toapplyforasummerjob).
application,CV–longandshortversion
toinform,toofferhelp/services
LinguisticcompetenceCancreateparagraphlevelcohesionandusescohesivedevicestosequenceinformation,givereasons,exemplify,orconclude,e.g.‘therefore’,‘forexample’or‘although’(‘sothat’,‘consequently’,‘asaresult’....)Canuseasufficientrepertoireofwords,phrasesandstructureswithenoughcontrolsothatthemessageisclear.
(*)year5-7functionssupplementedby...(**)sufficientreferstothetextstypesandfunctionslistedaboveandinyears5-7Texttypes Features ExamplesapplicationletterincludingCV
-hasaletterhead-beginswithasalutation-listsreasonsforapplyingandqualifications-endswithafinalstatementandsignature-CVlistsinformationinastructuredway(attachment)
applicationforasummerjob
articleinyouthmagazine
-hasaheadline-describes,reports,tellsstoriesordiscussestopics-endswithaconcludingstatement
adventure,fieldtrip,pets,music…
biography -hasatitle (personal)heroes,
23
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
-describescharacteristicfeaturesofaperson/groupofpeople,e.g.physicalappearance,behaviour,activities,preferences-describeseventsinthelife/livesoftheperson/people
sportspeople,celebrities
card -beginswithasalutation-greets,congratulates,invites….someone-endswithanendnote
birthday,invitation,party,farewell,congratulation…..
email -hasasubjectline-canbeginwithasalutation-brieflydescribesplaces,peopleorobjects;reportsaboutactivitiesorevents;respondstoatext(e.g.anotheremail,articleetc.)-endswithanendnote-canuseacronymsandtextmessageshorthand-canbeinteractive(maycontainquestions,replies,requests…)
s.a.
essay -hasatitle-startsbyoutliningthetopic-describesitemsrelatedtothetopicintheirrightorder-explainshowtheitemsrelatetoeachotherandtothetopic-endswithaconcludingstatement-canincludevisualimages,e.g.pictures,flowchartsordiagramstosupportthetext
topicpresentation
factualdescription
-hasatitle-beginswithanintroductorystatement-systematicallydescribesdifferentaspectsofthesubject-endswithaconcludingstatement-isobjective(nopersonalopinion)
hometown
factualreport -hasatitle-beginswithageneralclassificationordefinition-includesbackgroundinformationaboutwho,whenorwhere-listsasequenceofactivitiesorevents-endswithaconcludingcomment-isobjective(nopersonalopinion)
schoolproject,historicalreport
film/book/playsummary
-hasatitle-describessetting,charactersandplot
film/book/play
film/book/playreview
-hasatitle-brieflydescribessetting,charactersandplot-describeshowthewriterfeelsaboutanovel,film,bookorplay-listswhatdidanddidnotappealtothewriterorprovidesapersonalcommentonthecharactersorevents
film/book/play
form -requiresshortanswersmostlyfollowingagivenstructure-canuseacronyms
membershipforms
informaldescription
-hasatitle-beginswithanintroductorystatement-describesdifferentaspectsofthesubjectorobject-mayincludethewriter’sopinion-endswithaconcludingstatement
people,objects,animals,landscapes
informalreport
-hasatitle-beginswithanintroductorystatement-includesbackgroundinformationaboutwho,whenorwhere-describesasequenceofactivitiesorevents-mayincludethewriter’sopinion-endswithaconcludingstatement
activities,events
letter -beginswithasalutation-describesplaces,peopleorobjects;reportsaboutactivitiesorevents;respondstoatext(e.g.anotherletter,articleetc.)
penpals,holiday,complaint,invitation,planning,
24
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
-endswithanendnote-isinteractive(maycontainquestions,replies,requestsetc.)
lettertotheeditor(youthmag)
note -canbeginwithasalutation-verybrieflydeliversamessage-canendwithanendnote-canusetelegraphese,acronymsandtextmessageshorthand
homelate,wheretofindfood
poem -hasatitle-textmayrhyme-doesnothavetofollowrulesofgrammarorpunctuation
postcard -canbeginwithasalutation-brieflydescribesplaces,peopleorobjectsand/orreportsaboutactivitiesorevents;-canusetelegraphese
holiday,weekendtrip
processdescription
-hasatitle-beginswithastatementofthegoal(canbethetitle)-canlistmaterials/ingredientsneeded-givesaseriesofsteps(instructions)inchronologicalorder
pizzarecipe
story,legend,fairytale,fable
-hasatitle-hasabeginning,middle,andend-time,place(setting)andcharactersareintroduced-hasastoryline/plot-maycontainamessage/moral-mayberealorinvented
picturestories,adventure,fantasy,sciencefiction,crimeandsuspense
surveyoutline -hasatitle-beginswithastatementofthegoal(canbethetitle)-listsquestionstobeasked
useofmobilephonesinclass
surveyreport -hasatitle-beginswithastatementofthegoal(canbethetitle)-canlistquestionsthatwereasked-givesasummaryofresults(canbedoneindiagrammaticform)
useofmobilephonesinclass
textmessage -usesacronymsandtextmessageshorthand-isinteractive(s.a.)
s.a.
Writingrubricyears5&6
Innovating/4.0 Applying/3.0 Developing/2.0 Beginning/1.0
TaskAchievementHowwelldoesthewriterconveytheconcretemessage?Arethereanyconcretedetails?Doesthewritersticktothetextfeatures?
-message/contentmeaningfulandsuccessful-somedetails-goodlayout&format-textfeaturesmet
-message/contentmeaningfulandmostlysuccessful-fewdetails-layout&formatappropriate-textfeaturesmostlymet
-message/contentsometimesunclear-hardlyanydetails-layout&formatmessy-textfeaturesnotcompletelymet
-message/contentoftenunclear-nodetails-layout,formatnotappropriate-beginningtousetextfeatures
CoherenceandcohesionHowwellisthetextorganised?Arebeginning,middleandendclearlyand
-textorganisedwithbeginning–middle-end-severalsentencestarters,linkingwords-ideasclusteredinparagraphs;notalwaysmarked
-textorganisedwithsenseofbeginningandend-somesentencestartersandlinkingwords-ideassometimes
-someideaofbeginningorend-somelinkingwords,e.g.‘and’,‘but’,‘because’-ideasnotlinked
-isolatedsentences-somesentenceco-ordinationwith‘and’or‘but’
25
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
effectivelymarked?Isthetextcoherentonsentencelevel?Areparagraphsvisiblymarked?
linked
LinguisticrangeHowvariedarelexicalelementsandgrammaticalstructures?Howwelldotheysupportthemessageandcontributetothesuccessofthetext?
-linguisticrangeiscompletelyappropriateandpurposeful-simplecompoundandoccasionallysomecomplexsentences
-linguisticrangeappropriate-somerepetitions-sentencestructuresshowsomevariationbutarerepetitive
-linguisticrangesometimeslimited-severalrepetitions-sentencestructuresoftenrepetitive
-limitedlinguisticrange-sentencestructurehighlyrepetitive
AccuracyHowcorrectisthelanguage?Domistakes(lexisorgrammar)impairunderstanding?
-languagealmostalwayscorrectandalwayscomprehensible-minormistakesmayoccur
-languagemostlycorrectandalmostalwayscomprehensible
-languagesometimescorrectandtobeunderstoodmostofthetime
-languagecorrectenoughtobeunderstoodbyaninternationalaudience
Writingrubricyears7&8
Innovating/4.0 Applying/3.0 Developing/2.0 Beginning/1.0
TaskAchievementHowwelldoesthewriterconveythemessage?Arethereanydetails?Doesthewritersticktothetextfeatures?
-message/contentmeaningfulandcompletelysuccessful-severalrelevant/interesting/creativedetails-layout&formatoutstanding-textfeaturesmet-wordlimitmetorexceeded
-message/contentmeaningfulandmostlysuccessful-somedetails-layout&formatappropriate-textfeaturesmet-appropriatelength
-message/contentsometimesunclear-hardlyanydetails-textfeaturesmetbuttextshorterthanexpected
-message/contentoftenunclear-nodetails-layout,formatnotappropriate;-textfeaturesnotcompletelymet;limitedlength
CoherenceandcohesionHowwellisthetextorganised?Arebeginning,middleandendclearlyandeffectivelymarked?Doesthetextflow,i.e.isitcoherentonsentenceandparagraphlevel?Areparagraphs
-textwellorganisedwithstrongbeginning–middle-strongend-sentencestarters,linkingwordsusedeffectively-goodsentencelevelcoherence-paragraphslargelycoherent
-textorganisedwithsenseofbeginning–middle-end-sentencestartersandlinkingwordsusedthroughout-somesentencelevelcohesion-paragraphsclearlymarked
-textlooselyorganised-somelinkingwords-verylittlesentencelevelcohesion-ideasclusteredinparagraphsbutnotalwaysmarked
-isolatedsentences-somesentenceco-ordination,e.g.with‘and’,‘but’or‘because’
26
R&E-SOURCEhttp://journal.ph-noe.ac.atOpenOnlineJournalforResearchandEducationAusgabe5,April2016,ISSN:2313-1640
coherentandvisiblymarked?LinguisticrangeHowvariedarelexicalelementsandgrammaticalstructures?Howwelldotheysupportthemessageandcontributetothesuccessofthetext?
-linguisticrangehelpstoconveymessageeffectively(i.e.choiceofwords/phrases/structuresmakethetextinteresting/engaging)-consistentvariation(compoundandcomplexsentences)
-linguisticrangeisappropriateandpurposeful-somevariationthroughcompoundandcomplexsentences
-linguisticrangesometimeslimited-somerepetitions-sentencestructuresshowlittlevariationandarerepetitive
-limitedlinguisticrange-frequentrepetitions-sentencestructuresimpleandhighlyrepetitive
AccuracyHowcorrectisthelanguage?Domistakes(lexisorgrammar)impairunderstanding?
-languagealmostalwayscorrectandalwayscomprehensible-minormistakesmayoccur
-languagemostlycorrectandalmostalwayscomprehensible
-languagesometimescorrectandtobeunderstoodmostofthetime
-languagecorrectenoughtobeunderstoodbyaninternationalaudience