plant biotechnology, science writing, and public communication

48
Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication Kevin M. Folta Professor and Chairman Horticultural Sciences Department kfolta.blogspot.com @kevinfolta [email protected]

Upload: university-of-florida

Post on 16-Jul-2015

78 views

Category:

Science


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public

Communication

Kevin M. FoltaProfessor and Chairman

Horticultural Sciences Department

kfolta.blogspot.com@kevinfolta

[email protected]

Page 2: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

• Connecting genes to important traits in small fruits using novel genomics approaches

• Marker-assisted breeding

• Examine how light affects plant traits, and use as a non-chemical treatment for enhanced shelf life

• Use of natural fruit volatiles to slow spoilage

• Changing flavor and nutrient content with light treatments

My Research Program

Page 3: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

• Why is there a problem with acceptance of biotech?

• What are the current technologies?

• How do we communicate the science effectively?

• What are our lost opportunities and costs of non-action?

• What can you do to participate?

Page 4: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication
Page 5: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Irony at the Apple Store

We loves new Apple products!

I demand new technology!

The best company on earth!

New improved products!

Don’t want new apple products!

New improved products!

If nature didn’t make it, I don’t want it!!

Down with corporations!

Page 6: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

What Plant Genetic Improvement Is

More varieties

Grow better under given conditions

Improved yields

Safer products

Improved nutrtion

Page 7: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

What Plant Genetic Improvement Is

People t hink

Improved yields

Page 8: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Rel

ativ

e nu

mbe

r in

pop

ulat

ion

Relative scientific understanding

Nonexperts

Farmers, scientists,

Etc.

MOST PEOPLE!!!!

FEAR FACTS

Manufactured Risk!

Page 9: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

What Does the General Public Really Think?

“92% of Americans demand to know what is in their food”

Page 10: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication
Page 11: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication
Page 12: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Why is there even a problem?

Manufactured risk for profit

Political motivations (anti-corporate sentiment)

Well meaning people responding to a compelling bad-science message

Page 13: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Why is there even a problem?

Oz Smith Shiva Adams Mercola Food Babe

There is a lot of money to be made in manufacturing risk around food.

Page 14: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Why is there even a problem?

Page 15: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Why is there even a problem?

How do we fix the problem?

Center for Food Integrity

Page 16: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Fixing the problem.

Who is your audience?

This is not a formula for insincerity.

If you don’t believe it, don’t say it.

These are just hints of how to better communicate science more effectively, and there is a method to earning trust.

Page 17: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

How Do Reach that Middle?

1. FACTS DON’T MATTER.

You have to start from SHARED VALUES.

What are some common themes shared by those that embrace the technology and those that deplore it ?

WHO IS YOUR AUDIENCE?Most of the time these are people that don’t know about science and are concerned about food. Share science with them.

Page 18: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Personalize your message.

Tell your story. Start with your concerns.

Talk about points that everyone can agree upon

Refer to your family, your personal goals.

Page 19: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

State your larger priorities up front

FarmersDeveloping World

The NeedyFood Safety

Environment

Consumers

Page 20: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

How Do Reach that Middle?

2. Plant genetic improvement is not “natural”

Remind audiences that genetic improvement of food is a continuum.

Almost none of the plants we regularly consume originated in North America. Almost all were brought here by humans.

None of the food you eat is like its “natural” form

GM technology is simply the most precise version of an age-old practice of breeding and selection.

Page 21: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Humans have always manipulated crop genetics

Page 22: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication
Page 23: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

How Do Reach that Middle?

3. Plant Biotechnology is an extension of traditional breeding, just much more precise.

Page 24: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

GE vs. Traditional Breeding

Wide crosses exchange hundreds or thousands of genes and gene variants; GE moves only one/few.

Traditional breeding frequently uses plants that could never normally cross, GE uses genes from self or any other organism

GE can monitor the effect of a specific change; breeding seeks to judge the effect on plant productivity and does not address possible effects on individual genes.

Page 25: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

4. Know a Few Central Core Concepts

Humans have always participated in plant genetic improvement.

Transgenic crop technology (familiar “GMO”) is a precise extension of conventional plant breeding.

“The techniques used pose no more risk (actually less risk) than conventional breeding.” (NAS, AAAS, AMA, EFSA many others)

In the 18 years these products have been used, there has not been one case of illness or death related to these products

In the USA there are several traits used in only 8 (- +) commercial crops

Page 26: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

How Do Reach that Middle?

5. There are only several biotech crops commercially available and only three traits.

Page 27: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

GM Crops Available Now

10

potato

apple

Page 28: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

What are the Three Main Traits?

Virus Resistance

Insect Resistance

Herbicide Resistance

(how the traits work lecture online – (google “ UF biotechnology literacy day”)

Page 29: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Strengths Limitations

Virus resistance Works great, no foreign material

Has cut insecticide use by 10-70%

Saves time, labor, fuel. Allows conservation tillage

Can spread to nonGM populations

Pockets of developing resistance

Resistant weeds are a problem in areas.

Insect resistance

Herbicide resistance

6. Honestly discuss strengths and limitations.

Page 30: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Glyphosate resistant and insect resistant crops, while helpful to farmers, do not win the hearts and minds of the general public

7. Win back emotional capital with lost opportunities

Page 31: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Golden Rice

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Opposition to golden rice cost $2 billion to farmers in developing countries and 1.4 million human years – Wesseler et al., 2014

Page 32: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Cassava

Virus Resistant Cassava (VIRCA)

Biocassava Plus (BC Plus)

250 million depend on cassava

50 million tons lost to virus.

X

X Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 33: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Allergy-Free Peanuts

Peanut – RNAi suppression Ara h2

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 34: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Low Acrylamide, non Browning Potatoes

X

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 35: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Non Browning ApplesSilencing a gene that leads to discoloration

X

X

Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Small Business!X

Page 36: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication
Page 37: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

BS2 TomatoA pepper gene in tomato eases black spot and wilt.

X

X Farmers

Consumers

Environment

Needy

Page 38: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Stopping Citrus Greening

Spinach defensin

NPR1

Lytic peptides

Many show promise

Earliest deregulation is 2019

Page 39: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

8. Rely on Graphics Over Words

Instead of “glyphosate is relatively harmless- don’t worry about it.”

Page 40: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

9. Communications Barriers

People reject the validity of scientific conclusions if they contradict their deeply held views

“Backfire Effect”- when confronted with evidence that is contrary to their views, people tend to believe that the evidence is distorted. They also “dig in the heels” with their beliefs

Cultural Cognition – belief in trangenic harm as part of a package of beliefs

False Equivalence, “no consensus among scientists”

Page 41: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

More Barriers: Avoid these Mistakes

Avoid “feed the world” rhetoric

Always discuss strengths and limitations

Don’t ever claim it is a single solution.

Don’t discount all facets of “organic” ag

Don’t criticize other forms of genetic improvement…

Never get backed into the “science no”“Can you guarantee that these are absolutely safe?”

Page 42: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

New Barriers– Activists Discrediting Scientists

1.Scientists afraid to engage the public2.Scientists take soft positions on hard science3.Activists get free control of the media/middle4.Huge costs for universities5.Universities urge non-participation6.Damned if you do, damned if you don’t7.Intimidation, harassment

#Science14

Page 43: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

10. Maximizing your e-Real EstateTalking to public audiences – Get Involved!

Encourage your grower clients and producers to get involved.

Obtain a dedicated Gmail account- use their real names.

Sign up for facebook, twitter, instagram, pintrest, etc.

Get a blog space on blogspot.com or wordpress.

Answer questions in comments sections of news articles.

Page 44: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Claiming your e-Real EstateTalking to public audiences – Get Involved!

Plant genetic improvement techniques are safe.

All methods involve some small risk– but all are about the same risk as traditional breeding.

Techniques that breed in traits can take a long time

Directed changes are more precise and more rapidly available, but frequently require regulatory hurdles

Page 45: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Our clients are the solution. Encourage them to Communicate.

Farmers are 1.5% of the population, yet are ~0.001% of the presence in social media.

People are interested in food and farming

They look to social media for answers

Farmers consistently are rated as most credible sources of information

Page 46: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Our farmers are the solution.

Jennie Schmidt

Brian Scott

Sarah Schultz

Page 47: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

SOLUTIONS:

Scientists, industry people and farmers need to get involved in public awareness and education.

We need to stand up for good science that can help farmers, the needy, the environment and give consumers more choice.

It is most important to concentrate on the middle, the people that are unsure about technology, and tend to be influenced by fear.

Talk to them, don’t just push science.

Page 48: Plant Biotechnology, Science Writing, and Public Communication

Thank you

kfolta.blogspot.com@kevinfolta

[email protected]

"There is a path to truth and sincerity that you must guard and defend“

-- Teruyuki Okazaki It is our mission to stand up for the truth that science gives us.

Dr. Jack PayneSVP UF/IFAS

Thanks to Dr. Borlaug