plant physiology preview. published on august 10, 2012, as ... · 8/10/2012 · rothamsted...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Running head: UPDATE ON BSMV-MEDIATED FUNCTIONAL GENOMIC TOOLS
Corresponding author:
Kostya Kanyuka Wheat Pathogenomics Team Plant Biology and Crop Science Department Rothamsted Research Harpenden, AL5 2JQ United Kingdom tel: +44 (0)1582 763133 e-mail: [email protected] Article category: UPDATE
Plant Physiology Preview. Published on August 10, 2012, as DOI:10.1104/pp.112.203489
Copyright 2012 by the American Society of Plant Biologists
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
2
Barley stripe mosaic virus-mediated tools for investigating gene function in cereal plants and
their pathogens: VIGS, HIGS and VOX
Wing-Sham Lee, Kim E. Hammond-Kosack, and Kostya Kanyuka*
Wheat Pathogenomics Team, Plant Biology and Crop Science Department, Rothamsted Research,
Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
3
Footnotes
1 W-S.L., K.K. and K.H.K. are supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research
Council of the UK (BBSRC) through the Institute Strategic Programme 20:20 Wheat®.
* Corresponding author; e-mail [email protected].
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
4
ABSTRACT
Food security is now considered to be a worldwide global priority. It necessitates research aimed to
increase productivity of our major monocot crops including wheat, maize and barley. This aim can
only be achieved through better understanding of crop plant biology, physiology and gene function.
DNA and RNA sequencing is undergoing a revolution, rapidly providing vast amount of novel data for
downstream functional genomics analyses. Here we review the most recent significant and exciting
advances in the development and deployment of Barley stripe mosaic virus vector derived tools,
namely Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS), Host-mediated gene silencing (HIGS), and Virus-
mediated overexpression of heterologous protein (VOX). These tools have high potential to facilitate
identification and functional characterisation of genes in cereal crops that play key roles in various
sustainability traits, as well as genes in crop-associated organisms, such as plant pathogenic fungi,
that play key roles during plant colonisation.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
5
INTRODUCTION
Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV), the Hordeivirus type member, is the most intensely studied virus
that naturally infects two major monocot crops, namely wheat (Triticum aestivum) and barley
(Hordeum vulgare). The tripartite genome of this virus, comprising of RNAα, RNAβ and RNA�, was
sequenced and cloned in the late 1980’s. Since then there have been significant advances in the
understanding of the molecular biology of BSMV and the function of the seven main proteins encoded
by its genome (Jackson et al., 2009) (Figure 1A).
In a field situation, BSMV is easily transmitted from infected to healthy crop through plant-to-plant
contact and on most cultivars it causes mild to moderate mosaic symptoms. The virus is also known
to be efficiently transmitted via the seed (Jackson et al., 2009). In the laboratory, BSMV can be
mechanically transmitted by rub inoculation to maize, oat, Brachypodium and over 250 other species
mostly in the Poaceae (Jackson and Lane, 1981). However, amongst these are several dicot species
including Nicotiana benthamiana, in which BSMV causes mild systemic mosaic, and Chenopodium
spp., a local lesion host.
In recent years, BSMV has become a popular vector for Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) in
barley and wheat (Scofield and Nelson, 2009; Cakir et al., 2010). This arose primarily because of the
availability of full-length infectious BSMV clones and an increasingly detailed knowledge of molecular
and biological function of its various genome components (Figure 1A). VIGS is a powerful functional
genomics tool for the rapid targeted down-regulation of host plant genes (Becker and Lange, 2010;
Senthil-Kumar and Mysore, 2011). It exploits the fact that infection of plants by viruses activates Post-
Transcriptional Gene Silencing (PTGS) defence response (Waterhouse et al., 2001). In VIGS, a short
fragment of a transcribed sequence of a plant gene is inserted into a cloned virus genome and the
recombinant virus is then inoculated onto test plants (Figure 1B). The introduced virus multiplies and
spreads from the site of infection into newly developing regions of the plant and triggers PTGS. The
inserted plant gene sequence also becomes the target for silencing, and so does the corresponding
endogenous gene. This leads to a reduction or in some cases the complete abolition of target plant
gene function, which in turn results in phenotype changes.
Bread wheat is an allohexaploid, containing three copies of each gene representing ancestrally
distinct homoeologous genomes A, B and D. The BSMV-based VIGS system (hereafter referred to as
BSMV-VIGS) is effective in simultaneous silencing of all functionally active homoeologous gene
copies in wheat. It can also target simultaneously at least two unrelated genes (Cakir and Scofield,
2008; Campbell and Huang, 2010). This increases efficiency and is highly cost effective. In these
aspects BSMV-VIGS is similar to the stable transformation-based RNA interference (RNAi), a more
commonly used technique for obtaining information about the function of individual genes in cereals
(Travella et al., 2006; McGinnis, 2010). However, the major advantage of BSMV-VIGS is that it is very
rapid. In addition, it has a moderately high throughput compared to RNAi that requires genetic
transformation. An appropriately replicated single BSMV-VIGS experiment is usually completed in 5-6
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
6
weeks and many different plant genotypes can be tested simultaneously. By comparison, stable
cereal transformation requires a dedicated facility, well trained staff and is also relatively slow. At least
8 months are required to produce the primary transgenic barley or wheat lines (T0 generation), usually
in just a single genetic background. Stable transformation is only low throughput and true breeding
RNAi lines are not available until at least the T3 generation.
Due to its speed and moderately high throughput, BSMV-VIGS allows rapid pre-screening of
candidate genes prior to the use of other, more time consuming techniques to assess gene function
such as the stable RNAi transformation or TILLING (Targeting Induced Local Lesions IN Genomes)
(Comai and Henikoff, 2006).
With food security becoming one of the key strategic research priorities globally, there has been a
recent deluge of available sequence information for the transcriptomes and genomes of major cereal
crop species including rice, wheat, barley and maize, and a model grass species Brachypodium
distachyon (Berkman et al., 2012). The importance of BSMV-VIGS as a research tool for all aspects
of cereal plant research in conjunction with comparative genomics, computational analyses
(bioinformatics) and other currently available reverse genetic tools cannot be underestimated.
BSMV-VIGS already has an excellent track record for unravelling the function of leaf-expressed
genes in barley and wheat at the vegetative (seedling) stage of development. This research tool has
been used almost exclusively by plant pathologists, for determining the function of plant defence
signalling genes in multiple host-pathogen interactions. Since the two most recent comprehensive
reviews were written (Scofield and Nelson, 2009; Cakir et al., 2010), there have been significant
advances in the development and deployment of BSMV-VIGS in several additional monocot species.
Furthermore, two new applications of the BSMV vector have emerged. The first, named Host-Induced
Gene Silencing (HIGS) (Nowara et al., 2010), permits trans-species silencing and has been
successfully used for analysing the function of genes in plant pathogenic fungi that are expressed
during plant infection. The second enables heterologous protein overexpression in planta and has
been coined ‘VOX’ (Virus-mediated Overexpression) (Roger Wise, personal communication).
Moreover, there has recently been a substantial interest in adoption of BSMV-derived tools by
scientists in other plant disciplines. Here we review all these exciting, very recent published and
unpublished (presented and discussed at the International Cereals VIGS Workshop (ICVW),
Rothamsted Research, UK on 22-24 June 2011) advances and developments.
ADVANCES IN BSMV-INDUCED PLANT GENE SILENCING
Expansion of the host range for BSMV-VIGS
The success of BSMV-VIGS as a tool for functional genomic studies in barley and bread wheat has
led to its adoption and deployment in a number of other monocots. Silencing of phytoene desaturase
(PDS), a gene commonly used as a visual marker in VIGS experiments due to the resulting
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
7
characteristic photobleached phenotype (Figure 2A), has been demonstrated in B. distachyon
(Demircan and Akkaya, 2010; Pacak et al., 2010; Yuan et al., 2011). In Haynaldia villosa, a wild
grass, BSMV-VIGS has already been used for the functional analysis of powdery mildew resistance-
related genes (Wang et al., 2010). Other desirable traits of interest in these species including multiple
disease resistance, strong tillering ability, and high protein seed content can be tested and then
exploited by introgression breeding in commercial cereal crops.
BSMV-VIGS is currently being optimised for other valuable cereals such as millet (Setaria italic),
maize (Zea mays), and several members of the genus Triticum (D. Li, personal communication),
although similar experiments with oats have so far met with only limited success (Pacak et al., 2010).
There has been little work as yet with non-cereal monocots, however a study in culinary ginger
(Zingiber officinale) has successfully targeted PDS for silencing thereby demonstrating the potential
for the extension of BSMV-VIGS to a wider range of monocot hosts (Renner et al., 2009).
Application of BSMV-VIGS to disciplines beyond plant pathology
The BSMV-VIGS tool has been used to investigate the involvement of the WRKY53 transcription
factor and the phenylpropanoid pathway in resistance to aphids in wheat (van Eck et al., 2010). This
was a natural first step because plant virologists frequently collaborate with entomologists to study
insect virus vectors. A number of recent studies have used BSMV-VIGS to explore gene function in
other areas of plant science. In one study, silencing of the monocot-specific P23k gene in barley
resulted in morphological abnormalities such as strong asymmetry and cracks along the leaf margins,
confirming involvement of this gene in secondary cell wall biosynthesis (Oikawa et al., 2007). BSMV-
VIGS was also utilised to investigate the effect of silencing the barley cellulose synthase CesA (Held
et al., 2008), another gene predicted to be involved in cell wall biosynthesis. Interestingly, whilst the
gene silencing construct was designed to specifically target the cellulose synthase gene family, it also
triggered down-regulation of several homologous cellulose synthase-like genes, possibly due to
transitive silencing induced by secondary small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). A third study (Pacak et al.,
2010) demonstrated BSMV-induced silencing of three barley homologs of the Arabidopsis genes
involved in regulation of inorganic phosphate (Pi) uptake and translocation. Silencing of one of these
genes, under conditions of abundantly supplied Pi resulted in excessive Pi accumulation in the leaf
tissues compared to that in control barley plants. This silencing phenotype is reminiscent of the
Arabidopsis pho2 phosphate-accumulator mutant (Delhaize and Randall, 1995), indicating that PHO2
is functionally conserved in barley and Arabidopsis.
Silencing beyond the leaf
BSMV is readily transmitted through seed (Jackson et al., 2009) and also invades the root system (Lin
and Langenberg, 1984). Therefore, due to the biology of this virus, VIGS in flowering tissues, seeds
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
8
and roots should be possible. The first report on successful deployment of BSMV-VIGS in wheat roots
has just been published (Bennypaul et al., 2011). In this work the coronatine insensitive1 (COI1) gene
was targeted, and the silencing (85% decrease in transcript level) resulted in a 26% reduction in root
length.
At the ICVW several teams, including our own, already employing BSMV-VIGS in their research
convincingly reported the successful silencing of target genes in floral tissue in a range of different
wheat cultivars following inoculation of upper leaves at pre-heading (Figure 2B-D). A number of these
teams are interested in identifying host genes involved in susceptibility to Fusarium species that
cause Fusarium ear blight (also known as Fusarium head blight or scab), the globally important
disease of wheat and barley, which leads to deoxynivalenol (DON) mycotoxin contaminated grain at
harvest (Dean et al., 2012). In addition, Kulvinder Gill reported successful deployment of BSMV-VIGS
for analysing function of genes expressed in developing wheat grain and meiotic tissues. Silencing of
the granule-bound starch synthase (GBSS or waxy) gene resulted in substantial reductions in the
amylose content in seeds, whereas silencing of DMC1 (disrupted meiosis cDNA1), a gene involved in
early meiosis in pollen mother cells, led to the disruption of chromosome pairing at metaphase I.
Results of this pioneering study have since been published (Bennypaul et al., 2011). Gene silencing
in floral and reproductive tissues and the grain of wheat has been achieved by applying the
corresponding BSMV-VIGS constructs to older plants with the fully expanded flag leaf. We and others
(Patrick Schweizer, personal communication) have recently discovered that same can also be
achieved in rapid cycling wheat genotypes such as USU-Apogee (Bugbee, 1999) by BSMV vector
delivery to young plants (3-5 leaf stage) (Figure 2E-F).
Silencing in the next plant generations
BSMV is able to invade the reproductive tissues prior to fertilisation and the spread and survival of
this virus in nature is due to its ability to be transmitted through seed in barley and wheat (Jackson et
al., 2009). The inheritance of BSMV-induced gene silencing in the progeny of infected plants was
initially demonstrated for barley (Bruun-Rasmussen et al., 2007). This same phenomenon was
reported for wheat at the ICVW by Kulvinder Gill. This opens up the possibility of using VIGS to target
genes that are expressed during seed dormancy, germination, and early seedling development. The
presence of BSMV appears not to impair seed development and / or appearance (Figure 2G-H).
Recent work from both the Kulvinder Gill laboratory (Bennypaul et al., 2011) and our laboratory on
silencing of PDS indicate that ~ 10-15% of progeny from the inoculated wheat plants display
photobleaching and therefore retain silencing (Figure 2I-J). The efficiency of silencing in next
generations is highly influenced by the genotype (Bennypaul et al., 2011; Lee et al., unpublished). All
the next generation plants showing photobleaching contain BSMV with either the original or shortened
PDS-specific insert (Bruun-Rasmussen et al., 2007; Lee et al., unpublished). The silencing phenotype
in the next generation plants is therefore likely to be initiated by the recombinant BSMV being carried
within the seed rather than involving an epigenetic-based mechanism. Interestingly, the proportion of
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
9
plants showing PDS gene silencing increases with each subsequent generation of self-pollinated
plants and up to 90-100% of the third generation plants display photobleaching (Bennypaul et al.,
2011). Again, striking differences between wheat genotypes to exhibit photobleaching in later
generations were noted.
Vector improvements
Several variations have been made to the original BSMV-VIGS system. Each variation has important
implications for the throughput and ease of use of this research tool. The originally described system
used BSMV cDNA clones under the control of the strong bacteriophage T7 promoter. Capped
transcripts for the three BSMV genomes, RNAα, RNAβ and RNAγ, are produced in vitro,
subsequently mixed together and then rub-inoculated onto individual host plants. Fragments of target
plant genes are introduced into the BSMV RNAγ genome vector via restriction digestion with multiple
restriction enzymes and ligation-based cloning (Holzberg et al., 2002).
In vitro transcription is costly and prompted innovation. One variant system from the Roger Wise
laboratory avoids this expense by replacing the T7 promoter with the 35S promoter from Cauliflower
mosaic virus (CaMV) and introducing a ribozyme sequence downstream of each viral cDNA to
generate the correct 3’-end after transcription. These modifications allow in planta transcription of the
DNA plasmids following their delivery into barley leaf tissues using microprojectile particle
bombardment (Meng et al., 2009). Sap extracted from the transfected barley leaves containing
reconstituted virus can then be used to infect more plants for VIGS studies.
Another variant of the BSMV-VIGS vector retains the T7 promoter but replaces the original cloning
site immediately 3’ to the coding region in the BSMV RNAγ genome with a Ligation-Independent
Cloning (LIC) site in order to facilitate efficient insertion of target gene fragments (Pacak et al., 2010).
The latest report unites the advantages of both systems by coupling a LIC strategy for cloning target
gene fragment inserts with an Agrobacterium-mediated delivery system (Yuan et al., 2011). Here,
BSMV genomes cloned into a binary Ti vector under control of CaMV 35S promoter are first delivered
via agroinfiltration into the leaves of N. benthamiana, an intermediate host susceptible to both A.
tumefaciens and BSMV. Sap is then extracted from the infiltrated leaves and used to inoculate a large
number of monocotyledonous plants. Since this system was first described at the ICVW, there has
been significant interest in its uptake by members of the cereal VIGS community due to its relative
simplicity and low set-up costs.
BSMV FOR GENE SILENCING IN PLANT-ASSOCIATED ORGANISMS
An emerging and exciting new technical advancement is Host-Induced Gene Silencing (HIGS). In
HIGS, silencing that is triggered directly within the plant targets genes in plant pathogens or pests
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
10
(Figure 1Biii). The triggers, as in VIGS, are short double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs). However, in the
case of HIGS, the dsRNAs target pathogen or pest transcripts rather than plant transcripts. Silencing-
inducing dsRNAs are produced in the host plant cells following one of the three delivery methods: (i)
microprojectile particle bombardment of RNAi constructs into plant leaves, (ii) stable plant
transformation with RNAi constructs, or (iii) using a virus vector such as BSMV (Nunes and Dean,
2011). Plants either transiently or stably expressing the dsRNA triggers are then inoculated with the
relevant organism, and the role of a target pathogen or pest gene during the infection can be studied.
Very recently, HIGS has been successfully applied to the investigation of molecular interactions
between obligate biotrophic fungi and cereal crops. In one study (Nowara et al., 2010) both stable and
transient methods of delivery of silencing constructs have been explored. First, seventy-six RNAi
constructs, each targeting one of the genes of the barley powdery mildew fungus Blumeria graminis f.
sp. hordei known to be expressed in planta during infection, were bombarded into the individual
epidermal cells of barley leaves. The ability of the fungus to form a haustorium, a specialised post
infection feeding structure required for absorbing nutrients from the plant, within these epidermal host
cells was then analysed. Remarkably, nearly a quarter of the tested RNAi constructs induced
significant reduction of haustorium formation. The function of two fungal genes, GTF1 and GTF2,
targeted by these constructs was further investigated in transgenic RNAi barley lines (GTF1 only) and
also using BSMV-HIGS. Both approaches proved to be successful, and revealed different roles for
these two genes in fungal development, with GTF1 likely to be involved in initial haustorium formation
and GTF2 in elongation of secondary hyphae, necessary for colony formation. In the second study
(Yin et al., 2011) BSMV-HIGS was used to silence twelve genes of another obligate biotroph, the
stripe rust fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. The genes selected were known to be expressed
during infection of wheat leaves. In these experiments silencing was only observed for genes that
were preferentially highly expressed in haustoria and not in the bulk of the fungal mycelial colony. For
both species, fungal haustoria penetrate mesophyll cells in host leaf tissue and represent the interface
for signal exchange between the fungus and the invaded plant. Presumably RNA silencing was most
efficient in fungal cells in very close proximity to plant cellular cytoplasm and less so in fungal hyphae
which have an extracellular localisation.
The mechanism(s) by which RNA silencing signals are delivered from the plant cell into fungal cells is
currently a mystery. For obligate biotrophic fungal pathogens like barley powdery mildew it has been
hypothesised that these signals are transported from the plant cell into the haustorial cells (Nowara et
al., 2010). However, these fungal cells are separated from the host cells by the fungal cell wall and
plasma membrane as well as by the extrahaustorial matrix and extrahaustorial membrane derived
from the plant plasma membrane (Panstruga and Dodds, 2009) (Figure 1Biii). Therefore, the silencing
signal (which most probably is a short dsRNA or single-stranded RNA) needs to cross multiple
physical barriers in order to initiate HIGS. One of the suggested transport routes is the exosomal
secretory pathway (Nowara et al., 2010). But clearly further research is required to answer this
intriguing question.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
11
HIGS of fungal genes in stably transformed plant RNAi lines in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus
Glomus intraradices - Medicago truncatula interaction, where the fungal and host cellular membranes
are again in close proximity, has also been demonstrated successfully (Helber et al., 2011). Recently,
another study demonstrated that expression of a β-glucuronidase (gus)-derived dsRNA hairpin in
tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) could trigger specific silencing of this gene in the mycelia of a transgenic
GUS-expressing strain of Fusarium verticillioides during infection (Tinoco et al., 2010). This result is
particularly important because F. verticillioides growth is exclusively extracellular, and this fungus is
not known to produce an intracellular feeding structure.
Within the past two years, a BSMV-based HIGS system has emerged as a viable alternative, or at
least a complementary approach to that of generating numerous fungal gene knock-outs to
investigate the role of fungal genes in plant-fungus interactions (Nunes and Dean, 2011). This method
is particularly useful for studies of important plant pathogens and symbionts for which stable
transformation methods are not yet available, or for obligate plant-associated organisms that cannot
be cultured in vitro.
BSMV FOR OVEREXPRESSION OF HETEROLOGOUS PROTEINS (BSMV-VOX)
Virus-mediated overexpression of heterologous proteins (VOX) using the BSMV vector was first
demonstrated in studies involving the Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) reporter and barley (Haupt et
al., 2001; Lawrence and Jackson, 2001). Although the overall levels of GFP expression from BSMV
was shown to be strong, expression was often reported to be patchy in the systemically-infected
vegetative tissue of monocotyledonous plant hosts. Whilst Lawrence and Jackson (2001) initially
suggested that this may be due to BSMV exiting the vasculature at more than one location in
systemically-infected leaves, forming multiple infection loci, it is probably also due in part to the
relatively large size of GFP (720-nt), and subsequently, the instability of the GFP coding sequence in
the viral genome.
The community consensus is that larger fragments appear to be lost from the BSMV vector more
frequently than smaller fragments (Bruun-Rasmussen et al., 2007). Mutants with a reduced insert size
stand higher chances of establishing systemic infection because they are generally more fit (i.e. they
replicate faster and / or move within the infected plant faster) than their originally sized recombinant
counterparts. As reported by different authors, inserts within the range of 140-bp to 500-bp when
integrated into the RNAγ genome of BSMV are relatively more stable than larger inserts (Holzberg et
al., 2002; Scofield and Nelson, 2009). Indeed, a flavin-based fluorescent reporter protein iLOV that is
approximately half the size of GFP (Chapman et al., 2008), appears to be more stably and more
uniformly expressed compared to GFP when delivered to wheat and barley leaves using BSMV vector
(Figure 3A and Kanyuka et al., unpublished).
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
12
Despite this significant size constraint on BSMV-VOX, it is already a viable strategy for investigating
the function of small proteins, such as those predicted to be fungal effectors. The majority of known
fungal effectors are small (i.e. comparable in size with iLOV), usually cysteine-rich secreted proteins
containing no conserved functional domains (Stergiopoulos and de Wit, 2009). Confirmed fungal
effector proteins are of particular interest, because for some their production in planta is known to be
essential for successful pathogen invasion and colonisation, whilst others are the cues detected by
plants that lead to the triggering of resistance (R) gene mediated defence (Jones and Dangl, 2006).
BSMV-VOX has already been used to express the ToxA effector protein from Pyrenophora tritici-
repentis, the causal agent of tan spot disease in wheat (Tai et al., 2007; Manning et al., 2010).
Previously, it was known that ToxA produced in vitro and purified from the culture filtrate induces
necrosis on wheat cultivars susceptible to the disease when infiltrated into the extracellular spaces of
the leaf (Ballance et al., 1989).
Some fungal effectors may be expected to either suppress plant innate immunity during early
invasion, or stimulate cell death or induction of necrosis at later stages of disease development.
BSMV-VOX has a major advantage over microprojectile particle bombardment, another methodology
for delivery of constructs for transient protein expression in plant leaf cells, in that it avoids tissue
damage caused by bombardment that could be confused with effector-induced cell death. The ease
of inserting protein coding sequences into the BSMV vector also means that this approach could
potentially be used in a forward genetic screen to characterise the large numbers of putative effectors
now predicted from interrogation of the recently sequenced fungal genomes, for example Blumeria
graminis (Godfrey et al., 2010) and Fusarium graminearum (Brown et al., 2012).
In all BSMV-VOX studies to date involving cereal infecting fungal species, heterologous proteins were
expressed as direct C-terminal fusions to the viral γb protein. This approach, at least in some cases,
may be expected to compromise functionality or to affect the cellular localisation pattern of the
expressed protein and / or the viral γb protein. An alternative and more preferable approach involves
the use of self-processing peptide bridges, such as the 18-amino-acid-long catalytic autoproteolytic
2A peptide sequence of picornaviruses (El Amrani et al., 2004), between the fused proteins. This
approach has been successfully used in the past for the expression of GFP as an N-terminal fusion to
the BSMV γb protein (Torrance et al., 2006). We modified the BSMV RNAγ vector by inserting a
synthetic 2A gene at the 3’-terminus of the viral γb for production of C-terminal protein fusions (Figure
1Bii). This, in theory, should allow co-translational self-processing of the fusion protein resulting in
some free heterologous protein, and also permit expression of heterologous proteins with their native
N-termini e.g. proteins such as fungal effectors containing N-terminal signal peptides for secretion into
the plant apoplast. Our preliminary experiments on BSMV-VOX of NIP1, the necrosis-inducing small
secreted effector protein from Rhynchosporium commune (previously known as R. secalis) that
operates in the plant apoplast (Wevelsiep et al., 1991), confirm the above theory, albeit indirectly. R.
commune NIP1 is known to elicit defence reactions specifically in barley genotypes carrying the
cognate Rrs1 resistance gene (Rohe et al., 1995). Indeed, expression of the full-length NIP1 using a
modified BSMV as explained above resulted in genotype-specific Rrs1-dependent cell death. By
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
13
contrast, a truncated version of NIP1 (with the signal peptide removed) incapable of being secreted
failed to induce cell death on barley genotypes with or without Rrs1 (Figure 3B-C and Kanyuka et al.,
unpublished).
Recently, there has been a preliminary (conference) report of a new four-component BSMV vector
system that potentially enables much larger proteins to be stably expressed in planta (Robert
Brueggeman, personal communication). This system is outlined in Figure 4. If this system is indeed
proven to work, it has major implications for the use of BSMV-VOX in gene function studies. For
example, R gene candidates identified in mapping studies could be expressed directly in susceptible
genotypes, and genes from major resistance QTLs screened and identified. This type of vector would
also be highly applicable to gene function investigations through overexpression for a wide range of
predicted cereal proteins.
FINAL REMARKS AND NEW OPPORTUNITIES
The advent of the VIGS technology has revolutionised gene function discovery in many dicots and
has now become a powerful tool for plant science research. For monocots, VIGS is not yet centre
stage. However, recent significant improvements and developments in BSMV-VIGS, which include (i)
marked reduction in cost, (ii) expanded host range, (iii) ability to silence not only leaf genes but also
those expressed in root, floral tissues and the grain, and (iv) maintenance of silencing in the next
generation of plants, will certainly make this research tool more attractive to plant scientists and
present an exciting opportunity for new researchers entering the field. For example, in the near future
we expect to see BSMV-VIGS commonly used in plant research for rapid pre-screening / selecting
candidate genes from various gene cloning projects. BSMV-VIGS will also be very useful in a rapidly
growing number of genomics projects aiming to translate knowledge of gene function from model
plants to crops, such as wheat and barley. In coming years we also foresee expansion of usage of
BSMV as a vector for host-induced silencing of genes in various cereal-infecting plant pathogenic
species, especially for obligate biotrophs that cannot be grown in culture and other species that are
not yet amenable to stable transformation. Effector biology of plant-associated organisms is a
dynamic, new and exciting research area. No doubt BSMV-VOX will play an important role in
identification and functional characterisation of small effector proteins from plant-associated
organisms. Next generation derivatives of BSMV vectors allowing stable expression of larger proteins
are rumoured to become available in near future. When this happens, it will open enormous number
of new possibilities for functional protein analyses through overexpression in planta.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We thank the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council of the UK (BBSRC) for
sponsoring the ICVW (International Partnering Award, ref. BB/I025077/1), and the ICVW co-organiser
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
14
Steve Scofield (USDA-ARS & Purdue University, USA) and other participants for freely sharing their
ideas and unpublished information used in this manuscript. All experiments involving recombinant
BSMV at Rothamsted Research were conducted in biological containment facilities under Defra Fera-
PHSI licence number PHSI 181/6786. We thank Julian Franklin (Rothamsted Biosecurity Officer) as
well as our colleagues Martin Urban, Juliet Motteram, Jason Rudd and Hai-Chun Jing for their help
with experimental and desk work required for obtaining above mentioned plant health licence. We
also thank John Lucas, Alexandre Amaral and Martin Urban for critical reading of this manuscript.
LITERATURE CITED
Ballance GM, Lamari L, Bernier CC (1989) Purification and characterization of a host-selective
necrosis toxin from Pyrenophora tritici-repentis. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 35: 203–213
Becker A, Lange M (2010) VIGS - genomics goes functional. Trends Plant Sci 15: 1–4
Bennypaul HS, Mutti JS, Rustgi S, Kumar N, Okubara PA, Gill KS (2011) Virus-induced gene
silencing (VIGS) of genes expressed in root, leaf, and meiotic tissues of wheat. Funct Integr
Genomics 12: 143–156
Berkman PJ, Lai K, Lorenc MT, Edwards D (2012) Next-generation sequencing applications for
wheat crop improvement. Am J Bot 99: 365–371
Brown NA, Antoniw J, Hammond-Kosack KE (2012) The predicted secretome of the plant
pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum: A refined comparative analysis. PLoS One 7: e33731
Bruun-Rasmussen M, Madsen CT, Jessing S, Albrechtsen M (2007) Stability of Barley stripe
mosaic virus-induced gene silencing in barley. Mol Plant Microbe interact 20: 1323–1331
Bugbee BG (1999) Engineering plants for spaceflight environments. Gravit Space Biol Bul 12: 67–74
Cakir C, Scofield SR (2008) Evaluating the ability of the Barley stripe mosaic virus-induced gene
silencing system to simultaneously silence two wheat genes. Cereal Res Commun 36: 217–222
Cakir C, Gillespie ME, Scofield SR (2010) Rapid determination of gene function by virus-induced
gene silencing in wheat and barley. Crop Sci 50: S77–S84
Campbell J, Huang L (2010) Silencing of multiple genes in wheat using Barley stripe mosaic virus. J
Biotech Res 2: 12–20
Chapman S, Faulkner C, Kaiserli E, Garcia-Mata C, Savenkov EI, Roberts AG, Oparka KJ,
Christie JM (2008) The photoreversible fluorescent protein iLOV outperforms GFP as a reporter
of plant virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 20038–20043
Comai L, Henikoff S (2006) TILLING: practical single-nucleotide mutation discovery. Plant J 45:
684–694
Dean R, van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, di Pietro A, Spanu PD, Rudd JJ,
Dickman M, Kahmann R, Ellis J, Foster GD (2012) The Top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular
plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13: 414–430
Delhaize E, Randall PJ (1995) Characterization of a phosphate-accumulator mutant of Arabidopsis
thaliana. Plant Physiol 107: 207–213
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
15
Demircan T, Akkaya MS (2010) Virus induced gene silencing in Brachypodium distachyon, a model
organism for cereals. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 100: 91–96
El Amrani A, Barakate A, Askari BM, Li X, Roberts AG, Ryan MD, Halpin C (2004) Coordinate
expression and independent subcellular targeting of multiple proteins from a single transgene.
Plant Physiol 135: 16–24
Godfrey D, Böhlenius H, Pedersen C, Zhang Z, Emmersen J, Thordal-Christensen H (2010)
Powdery mildew fungal effector candidates share N-terminal Y/F/WxC-motif. BMC Genomics 11:
317
Haupt S, Duncan GH, Holzberg S, Oparka KJ (2001) Evidence for symplastic phloem unloading in
sink leaves of barley. Plant Physiol 125: 209–218
Helber N, Wippel K, Sauer N, Schaarschmidt S, Hause B, Requena N (2011) A versatile
monosaccharide transporter that operates in the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus sp is
crucial for the symbiotic relationship with plants. Plant Cell 23: 3812–3823
Held MA, Penning B, Brandt AS, Kessans SA, Yong W, Scofield SR, Carpita NC (2008) Small-
interfering RNAs from natural antisense transcripts derived from a cellulose synthase gene
modulate cell wall biosynthesis in barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 20534–20539
Holzberg S, Brosio P, Gross C, Pogue GP (2002) Barley stripe mosaic virus-induced gene silencing
in a monocot plant. Plant J 30: 315–327
Jackson AO, Lane LC (1981) Hordeiviruses. In E Kurstak, ed, Handbook of Plant Virus Infections
and Comparative Diagnosis. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 565–625
Jackson AO, Lim H-S, Bragg J, Ganesan U, Lee MY (2009) Hordeivirus replication, movement, and
pathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47: 385–422
Jones JD, Dangl JL (2006) The plant immune system. Nature 444: 323–329
Lawrence DM, Jackson AO (2001) Requirements for cell-to-cell movement of Barley stripe mosaic
virus in monocot and dicot hosts. Mol Plant Pathol 2: 65–75
Lin N-S, Langenberg WG (1984) Distribution of Barley stripe mosaic virus protein in infected wheat
root and shoot tips. J Gen Virol 65: 2217–2224
Manning VA, Chu AL, Scofield SR, Ciuffetti LM (2010) Intracellular expression of a host-selective
toxin, ToxA, in diverse plants phenocopies silencing of a ToxA-interacting protein, ToxABP1.
New Phytol 187: 1034–1047
Meng Y, Moscou MJ, Wise RP (2009) Blufensin1 negatively impacts basal defense in response to
barley powdery mildew. Plant Physiol 149: 271–285
McGinnis KM (2010) RNAi for functional genomics in plants. Brief Funct Genomics 9: 111–117
Nowara D, Gay A, Lacomme C, Shaw J, Ridout C, Douchkov D, Hensel G, Kumlehn J,
Schweizer P (2010) HIGS: host-induced gene silencing in the obligate biotrophic fungal
pathogen Blumeria graminis. Plant Cell 22: 3130–3141
Nunes CC, Dean RA (2011) Host-induced gene silencing: a tool for understanding fungal host
interaction and for developing novel disease control strategies. Mol Plant Pathol 13: 519–529
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
16
Oikawa A, Rahman A, Yamashita T, Taira H, Kidou S (2007) Virus-induced gene silencing of P23k
in barley leaf reveals morphological changes involved in secondary wall formation. J Exp Bot 58:
2617–2625
Pacak A, Geisler K, Jorgensen B, Barciszewska-Pacak M, Nilsson L, Nielsen TH, Johansen E,
Gronlund M, Jakobsen I, Albrechtsen M (2010) Investigations of Barley stripe mosaic virus as
a gene silencing vector in barley roots and in Brachypodium distachyon and oat. Plant Methods
6: 26
Panstruga R, Dodds PN (2009) Terrific protein traffic: the mystery of effector protein delivery by
filamentous plant pathogens. Science 324: 748–750
Renner T, Bragg J, Driscoll HE, Cho J, Jackson AO, Specht CD (2009) Virus-induced gene
silencing in the culinary ginger (Zingiber officinale): an effective mechanism for down-regulating
gene expression in tropical monocots. Mol Plant 2: 1084–1094
Rohe M, Gierlich A, Hermann H, Hahn M, Schmidt B, Rosahl S, Knogge W (1995) The race-
specific elicitor, NIP1, from the barley pathogen, Rhynchosporium secalis, determines avirulence
on host plants of the Rrs1 resistance genotype. EMBO J 14: 4168–4177
Scofield SR, Nelson RS (2009) Resources for virus-induced gene silencing in the Grasses. Plant
Physiol 149: 152–157
Senthil-Kumar M, Mysore KS (2011) New dimensions for VIGS in plant functional genomics. Trends
Plant Sci 16: 656–665
Stergiopoulos I, de Wit PJ (2009) Fungal effector proteins. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47: 233–263
Tai Y-S, Bragg J, Meinhardt SW (2007) Functional characterization of ToxA and molecular
identification of its intracellular targeting protein in wheat. Am J Plant Physiol 2: 76–89
Tinoco MLP, Dias BBA, Dall'Astta RC, Pamphile JA, Aragao FJL (2010) In vivo trans-specific
gene silencing in fungal cells by in planta expression of a double-stranded RNA. BMC Biol 31: 27
Torrance L, Cowan GH, Gillespie T, Ziegler A, Lacomme C (2006) Barley stripe mosaic virus-
encoded proteins triple-gene block 2 and γb localize to chloroplasts in virus-infected monocot
and dicot plants, revealing hitherto-unknown roles in virus replication. J Gen Virol 87: 2403–2411
Travella S, Klimm TE, Keller B (2006) RNA interference based gene silencing as an efficient tool for
functional genomics in hexaploid bread wheat. Plant Physiol 142: 7–20
van Eck L, Schultz T, Leach JE, Scofield SR, Peairs FB, Botha AM, Lapitan NLV (2010) Virus-
induced gene silencing of WRKY53 and an inducible phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in wheat
reduces aphid resistance. Plant Biotechnol J 8: 1023–1032
Wang X, Cao A, Yu C, Wang D, Chen P (2010) Establishment of an effective virus induced gene
silencing system with BSMV in Haynaldia villosa. Mol Biol Rep 37: 967–972
Waterhouse PM, Wang M-B, Lough T (2001) Gene silencing as an adaptive defence against
viruses. Nature 411: 834–842
Wevelsiep L, Kogel K-H, Knogge W (1991) Purification and characterization of peptides from
Rhynchosporium secalis inducing necrosis in barley. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 39: 471–482
Yin C, Jurgenson JE, Hulbert SH (2011) Development of a host-induced RNAi system in the wheat
stripe rust fungus Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24: 554–561
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
17
Yuan C, Li C, Yan L, Jackson AO, Liu Z, Han C, Yu J, Li D (2011) A high throughput Barley stripe
mosaic virus vector for virus induced gene silencing in monocots and dicots. PloS One 6: e26468
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
18
FIGURE LEGENDS
Figure 1. The Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) genome and mechanistic models for BSMV-
VIGS, BSMV-VOX and BSMV-HIGS.
The BSMV genome is comprised of three RNAs that are capped at the 5’-end and form a tRNA-like
hairpin secondary structure at the 3’-terminus. RNAα encodes the αa replicase protein containing
methyl transferase (MT) and helicase (HEL) domains. RNAβ encodes βa (coat protein), and the βb,
βc and βd movement proteins (also known as TGB1, TGB3 and TGB2, respectively). RNAβ also
encodes a minor protein βd’ (alias TGB2’), which is expressed by translational read-through of the βd
ORF. RNA� encodes �a, the polymerase (POL) component of replicase, and the cysteine-rich �b
protein involved in viral pathogenicity. B) For BSMV-VIGS, BSMV-VOX and BSMV-HIGS,
heterologous sequences of interest are typically inserted directly downstream of the stop codon of the
�b ORF. For each experimental scenario, the modified RNA� is mixed with RNAα and RNAβ (not
shown) and inoculated onto host plants. Bi) In BSMV-VIGS, a fragment from the plant gene of interest
is cloned into BSMV RNA� usually in the antisense orientation, downstream of the stop codon of the
�b ORF. After the virus enters a host plant cell, long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) formed during
viral replication are recognised by host Dicer-like enzymes (DCLs) that cleave it into 21-22-nt small
interfering RNAs (siRNAs). One strand of each siRNA is then incorporated into host RNA-induced
silencing complexes (RISC). RISC mediates endonucleolytic cleavage of single stranded RNAs with
sequence complementary to the incorporated siRNA strand. As some of these siRNAs will have been
generated from the plant gene fragment inserted in the BSMV genome, they will also guide RISC to
plant mRNAs with sequence complementarity, resulting in silencing of the target endogenous gene(s).
Bii) For BSMV-VOX, the coding sequence for the protein of interest is inserted immediately upstream
the in-frame stop codon of the �b ORF. In a new system, a small synthetic 2A gene encoding an
autoproteolytic peptide has been inserted between the 3’-terminus of the �b ORF and the gene
sequence coding for the heterologous protein. This enables self-processing (not shown) of the
ensuing �b fusion protein during translation of the virally-encoded proteins, which occurs very soon
after the entry of BSMV to the plant cell, thus releasing the free heterologous protein. Biii) In BSMV-
HIGS, a fragment of a fungal gene of interest is inserted in antisense orientation into RNA�
downstream of the stop codon of the �b ORF. RNA silencing signals generated within the plant cell
can then trigger gene silencing in fungal cells in intimate contact to these modified host cells, such as
fungal haustorial cells separated from plant cell membranes by only the extrahaustorial matrix (EHM).
The mechanism(s) by which HIGS occurs are not yet known, but fungal-specific siRNAs generated by
plant DCLs activity are likely to be involved.
Figure 2. Silencing of phytoene desaturase (PDS) in wheat leaves, ears and in the second plant
generation.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
19
A) Upper uninoculated leaves taken from plants infected with either BSMV:asGFP control (top) or the
BSMV:asPDS showing the resulting photobleached phenotype (bottom) at 28 days post inoculation
(dpi). B-D) Inoculating the flag and / or the penultimate leaf of pre-heading wheat plants can induce
silencing in the ears. The control BSMV:asGFP infected ears appear to develop normally (panel B).
Silencing of PDS in the ears (panels C and D) results in visible photobleaching of the glumes, awns
and rachis. Photographs were taken at 28 dpi. E-F) Inoculation of lower leaves of younger wheat cv.
Apogee plants at the 3-5 leaf stage often induces silencing in the flag leaf and ear. The control
BSMV:asGFP infected plants appear to develop normally (panel E), whereas the BSMV:asPDS
inoculations (panel F), induces almost complete photobleaching in the flag leaf, and partial
photobleaching in the ear. The plants were photographed at 28 dpi. G-H) Grain from uninfected plants
(panel G) and the BSMV:asPDS inoculated plants (panel H) are comparable in size and appearance.
I-J) A proportion (10-15 %) of the progeny from BSMV:asPDS infected plants also display partial
photobleaching of the leaves within 12 days of seed germination.
Figure 3. Barley stripe mosaic virus mediated over-expression of small heterologous proteins.
A) A fragment of wheat leaf infected with recombinant BSMV expressing a fluorescent reporter
protein iLOV. Image was obtained using confocal laser microscopy. Plant cell walls are coloured
purple and chloroplasts are in blue, whereas cells containing iLOV fluoresce green. B) Recombinant
BSMV expressing full-length Nip1 protein of Rhynchosporium commune induces cell death on leaves
of barley cv. Atlas 46 expressing the cognate resistance gene Rrs1. C) Recombinant BSMV
expressing full-length Nip1 protein of R. commune induces cell death on leaves of cv. Atlas 46
containing the cognate resistance gene Rrs1, but not on a near isogenic line Atlas devoid of Rrs1
(top). Truncated Nip1, with the N-terminal signal peptide removed (no SP), is unable to induce cell
death on barley. All photographs were taken at 7 days post inoculation.
Figure 4. A new, four component BSMV vector system for expression of larger sized
heterologous proteins.
The system comprises the wild-type BSMV RNAα and RNAβ, and two differently modified RNA�
(RNA�1 and RNA�2). RNA�1 has retained the functional �a replicase gene but a large deletion in
the �b coding region renders this gene non-functional. The almost complete deletion of the �b gene
is required to ensure the retention of, and heterologous protein expression from, the recombinant
RNA�2. The latter has large deletion in the �a coding region, which allows sequences of up to 2-kb
to be inserted into this region, whilst sequences downstream of �a including the �b gene have been
left intact. During plant infection it is anticipated that the intact ya coding region and yb coding region
expressed from the two differently modified RNA� will be able to function in this ‘trans’ configuration
and thereby generate infectious BSMV expressing larger sized, potentially up to approximately 65
kDa, heterologous proteins of interest.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 1
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 1. The Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) genome and mechanistic models for BSMV-VIGS, BSMV-VOX and BSMV-HIGS.
A) The BSMV genome is comprised of three RNAs that are capped at the 5’-end and form a tRNA-like hairpin secondary structure at the 3’-terminus. RNAα encodes the αa replicase protein containing methyl transferase (MT) and helicase (HEL) domains. RNAβ encodes βa (coat protein), and the βb, βc and βd movement proteins (also known as TGB1, TGB3 and TGB2, respectively). RNAβ also encodes a minor protein βd’ (alias TGB2’), which is expressed by translational read-through of the βd ORF. RNAɣ encodes ɣa, the polymerase (POL) component of replicase, and the cysteine-rich ɣbprotein involved in viral pathogenicity. B) For BSMV-VIGS, BSMV-VOX and BSMV-HIGS, heterologous sequences of interest are typically inserted directly downstream of the stop codon of the ɣb ORF. For each experimental scenario, the modified RNAɣ is mixed with RNAα and RNAβ (not shown) and inoculated onto host plants. Bi) In BSMV-VIGS, a fragment from the plant gene of interest is cloned into BSMV RNAɣ usually in the antisense orientation, downstream of the stop codon of the ɣb ORF. After the virus enters a host plant cell, long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) formed during viral replication are recognised by host Dicer-like enzymes (DCLs) that cleave it into 21-22-nt small interfering RNAs (siRNAs). One strand of each siRNA is then incorporated into host RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISC). RISC mediates endonucleolytic cleavage of single stranded RNAs with sequence complementary to the incorporated siRNA strand. As some of these siRNAs will have been generated from the plant gene fragment inserted in the BSMV genome, they will also guide RISC to plant mRNAs with sequence complementarity, resulting in silencing of the target endogenous gene(s). Bii) For BSMV-VOX, the coding sequence for the protein of interest is inserted immediately upstream the in-frame stop codon of the ɣb ORF. In a new system, a small synthetic 2A gene encoding an autoproteolytic peptide has been inserted between the 3’-terminus of the ɣb ORF and the gene sequence coding for the heterologous protein. This enables self-processing (not shown) of the ensuing ɣb fusion protein during translation of the virally-encoded proteins, which occurs very soon after the entry of BSMV to the plant cell, thus releasing the free heterologous protein. Biii) In BSMV-HIGS, a fragment of a fungal gene of interest is inserted in antisense orientation into RNAɣ downstream of the stop codon of the ɣb ORF. RNA silencing signals generated within the plant cell can then trigger gene silencing in fungal cells in intimate contact to these modified host cells, such as fungal haustorial cells separated from plant cell membranes by only the extrahaustorial matrix (EHM). The mechanism(s) by which HIGS occurs are not yet known, but fungal-specific siRNAs generated by plant DCLs activity are likely to be involved.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 2
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 2. Silencing of phytoene desaturase (PDS) in wheat leaves, ears and in the second plant generation.
A) Upper uninoculated leaves taken from plants infected with either BSMV:asGFP control (top) or the BSMV:asPDS showing the resulting photobleached phenotype (bottom) at 28 days post inoculation (dpi). B-D)Inoculating the flag and / or the penultimate leaf of pre-heading wheat plants can induce silencing in the ears. The control BSMV:asGFP infected ears appear to develop normally (panel B). Silencing of PDS in the ears (panels C and D) results in visible photobleaching of the glumes, awns and rachis. Photographs were taken at 28 dpi. E-F) Inoculation of lower leaves of younger wheat cv. Apogee plants at the 3-5 leaf stage often induces silencing in the flag leaf and ear. The control BSMV:asGFP infected plants appear to develop normally (panel E), whereas the BSMV:asPDS inoculations (panel F), induces almost complete photobleaching in the flag leaf, and partial photobleaching in the ear. The plants were photographed at 28 dpi. G-H)Grain from uninfected plants (panel G) and the BSMV:asPDS inoculated plants (panel H) are comparable in size and appearance. I-J) A proportion (10-15 %) of the progeny from BSMV:asPDS infected plants also display partial photobleaching of the leaves within 12 days of seed germination.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Barley stripe mosaic virus mediated over-expression of small heterologous proteins.
A) A fragment of wheat leaf infected with recombinant BSMV expressing a fluorescent reporter protein iLOV. Image was obtained using confocal laser microscopy. Plant cell walls are coloured purple and chloroplasts are in blue, whereas cells containing iLOV fluoresce green. B) Recombinant BSMV expressing full-length Nip1 protein of Rhynchosporium commune induces cell death on leaves of barley cv. Atlas 46 expressing the cognate resistance gene Rrs1. C) Recombinant BSMV expressing full-length Nip1 protein of R.commune induces cell death on leaves of cv. Atlas 46 containing the cognate resistance gene Rrs1, but not on a near isogenic line Atlas devoid of Rrs1(top). Truncated Nip1, with the N-terminal signal peptide removed (no SP), is unable to induce cell death on barley. All photographs were taken at 7 days post inoculation.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
Figure 4
Figure 4. A new, four component BSMV vector system for expression of larger sized heterologous proteins.
The system comprises the wild-type BSMV RNAα and RNAβ, and two differently modified RNAɣ (RNAɣ1 and RNAɣ2). RNAɣ1 has retained the functional ɣa replicase gene but a large deletion in the ɣb coding region renders this gene non-functional. The almost complete deletion of the ɣbgene is required to ensure the retention of, and heterologous protein expression from, the recombinant RNAɣ2. The latter has large deletion in the ɣa coding region, which allows sequences of up to 2-kb to be inserted into this region, whilst sequences downstream of ɣa including the ɣb gene have been left intact. During plant infection it is anticipated that the intact ya coding region and yb coding region expressed from the two differently modified RNAɣ will be able to function in this ‘trans’ configuration and thereby generate infectious BSMV expressing larger sized, potentially up to approximately 65 kDa, heterologous proteins of interest.
https://plantphysiol.orgDownloaded on November 24, 2020. - Published by Copyright (c) 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.