plant process design and economic analysis - terpconnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20material and energy...

106
1 Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis of a Proposed Process of a Gas to Liquid Plant (GTL) from Methane Fueled Synthesis Gas via the Fischer-Tropsch Reaction

Upload: vuongkhanh

Post on 10-Apr-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


4 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

1

Plant Process Design and

Economic Analysis

of a

Proposed Process of a Gas to Liquid Plant

(GTL) from Methane Fueled Synthesis Gas via

the Fischer-Tropsch Reaction

Page 2: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

2

Table of Contents

List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. 4

List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 4

List of Equations ............................................................................................................................. 5

Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9

Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 10

Discussion ..................................................................................................................................... 12

Process Description ................................................................................................................... 12

Equipment Design ..................................................................................................................... 14

Syngas Unit............................................................................................................................ 14

Air Separation unit................................................................................................................. 17

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor ........................................................................................................ 17

Hydro-Isomerization Unit...................................................................................................... 23

Product Separations ............................................................................................................... 23

Material and Energy Balance Discussion.................................................................................. 31

Safety and Environmental Summary......................................................................................... 32

Unit Control and Instrumentation Description .......................................................................... 36

Conclusions ................................................................................................................................... 37

Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 38

Project Premises and Assumptions ............................................................................................... 39

References ..................................................................................................................................... 41

Appendix ....................................................................................................................................... 44

Appendix A.1 – Process Flow Diagrams .................................................................................. 44

Appendix A.1.1 – Synthesis Gas Unit....................................................................................... 45

Appendix A.1.2 – Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Unit ..................................................................... 50

Appendix A.1.3 – Diesel and Wax Separation Unit ................................................................. 51

Appendix A.1.4 – Naphtha Separation Unit ............................................................................. 52

Appendix A.2 –Economics Summary ....................................................................................... 69

Appendix A.3 – Equipment Sizing Summary ........................................................................... 72

Appendix A.4 – Computer Simulation Outputs ........................................................................ 79

Page 3: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

3

Synthesis Gas Unit MATLAB Design Function ................................................................... 79

Synthesis Gas Unit MATLAB Design Output ...................................................................... 83

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor MATLAB Design Function .......................................................... 85

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor MATLAB Design Function .......................................................... 92

Appendix A.5 – Supporting Graphs .......................................................................................... 94

Appendix A.6 – Sample Calculations ..................................................................................... 102

Page 4: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

4

List of Figures

Figure 1. Plant Process Flow Diagram ......................................................................................... 44

Figure 2. Synthesis Gas Unit PFD ................................................................................................ 45

Figure 3. ASPEN Diagram for the Syngas Unit Heat Exchangers ............................................... 46

Figure 4. Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Unit PFD ............................................................................... 50

Figure 5. Diesel and Wax Separation Unit PFD ........................................................................... 51

Figure 6. Naphtha Separation Unit PFD ....................................................................................... 52

Figure 7. ASPEN Diagram for Diesel and Wax Separation Unit ................................................. 53

Figure 8. ASPEN Diagram for Naphtha Separation Unit ............................................................. 54

Figure 9. Sensitivity Analysis of the Plant.................................................................................... 78

Figure 10. Syngas Temperature Optimization .............................................................................. 94

Figure 11. Syngas Water to Methane Ratio Optimization ............................................................ 94

Figure 12. Reactor Temperature Optimization ............................................................................. 95

Figure 13. Reactor Cost Optimization .......................................................................................... 95

Figure 14. Graph of Conversion vs. Catalyst Weight in a Single Tube...................................... 100

Figure 15. Graph of Percent of Pressure Drop vs. Weight of Catalyst ....................................... 100

Figure 16. Graph of Temperature vs. Catalyst Weight of a Single Tube ................................... 101

Figure 17. Graph of Molar Flow Rates of Carbon Monoxide, Hydrogen, and Water vs. Catalyst

Weight in a Single Tube ............................................................................................................. 101

List of Tables

Table 1. Economic Summary .......................................................................................................... 8

Table 2. Syngas Effluent and Feed Streams 1-DIOXIDE ............................................................ 47

Table 3. Syngas Effluent and Feed Streams FTR-MP2OUT ........................................................ 48

Table 4. Syngas Effluent and Feed Streams O2TOSYN-TOSYN ............................................... 49

Table 5. Stream Table for Separation Streams 1-6 ....................................................................... 55

Table 6. Stream Table for Separation Streams 7-12 ..................................................................... 56

Table 7. Stream Table for Separation Streams 13-18 ................................................................... 57

Table 8. Stream Table for Separation Streams 19-24 ................................................................... 58

Table 9. Stream Table for Separation Streams 25-30 ................................................................... 59

Table 10. Stream Table for Separation Streams 31-36 ................................................................. 60

Table 11. Stream Table for Separation Streams 37-42 ................................................................. 61

Table 12. Stream Table for Separation Streams 43-48 ................................................................. 62

Table 13. Stream Table for Separation Streams 49-AIR .............................................................. 63

Table 14. Stream Table for Separation Streams FuelAir-Waste H2O .......................................... 64

Table 15. Stream Table for Separation Streams FuelAir-Waste H2O .......................................... 65

Table 16. Stream Table for Heat Integration Cool1-1 to Cool2-3 ................................................ 66

Table 17. Stream Table for Heat Integration Cool2In to LP1Out ................................................ 67

Table 18. Stream Table for Heat Integration MP1In and MP1Out............................................... 68

Page 5: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

5

Table 19. Economic Summary Breakdown .................................................................................. 69

Table 20. Utilities and Credits Breakdown ................................................................................... 70

Table 21. Products Breakdown ..................................................................................................... 70

Table 22. Inflation Effects on Profitability ................................................................................... 71

Table 23. Energy Efficiency ........................................................................................................ 71

Table 24. Economics Summary .................................................................................................... 71

Table 25. Equipotent Costs Summary ......................................................................................... 72

Table 26. Heat Exchanger Sizing Summary, Heat Exchangers 1-8 ............................................. 73

Table 27. Heat Exchanger Sizing Summary, Heat Exchangers 9-16 ........................................... 73

Table 28. Flash Drum Sizing Summary ........................................................................................ 74

Table 29. Decanter Sizing Summary ............................................................................................ 74

Table 30. Distillation Column Sizing Summary ........................................................................... 75

Table 31. Compressor Sizing Summary ....................................................................................... 75

Table 32. Fired Heater Sizing Summary....................................................................................... 75

Table 33. Refrigeration Summary ................................................................................................. 76

Table 34. Reactor Sizing Summary .............................................................................................. 76

Table 35. Syngas Unit Process Control Summary Table ............................................................. 77

Table 36. Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Control Summary Table ....................................................... 77

Table 37. Distillation Control Summary Table ............................................................................. 77

Table 38. Flash Drum Control Summary Table ............................................................................ 78

Table 39. Syngas Flow Rates for Temperature Optimization...................................................... 96

Table 40. Syngas Cost Optimization for Temperature Optimization ........................................... 96

Table 41. Syngas Flow Rates for Water to Methane Ratio Optimization .................................... 96

Table 42. Syngas Costs for Water to Methane Ratio Optimization .............................................. 97

Table 43. Material Balance for Syngas and FTR .......................................................................... 98

Table 44. Material Balance for Syngas and FTR 2 ....................................................................... 99

List of Equations

Equation 1. Steam Reforming Equilibrium Kinetics .................................................................. 102

Equation 2. Water-Gas Shift Reaction Equilibrium Kinetics ..................................................... 102

Equation 3. Anderson-Shulz-Flory (ASF) equation ................................................................... 102

Equation 4. Selectivity of Methane ............................................................................................. 102

Equation 5. Selectivity of Ethane, Propane, and Butane ............................................................ 102

Equation 6. Design Equation for a Packed-Bed Reactor ............................................................ 103

Equation 7. Fischer-Tropsch Rate Equation ............................................................................... 103

Equation 8. Ergun Equation to Model Pressure Drop in Packed-Bed Reactors ......................... 103

Equation 9. Temperature Gradient Calculation .......................................................................... 104

Equation 10. Thickness for Cylindrical Shells ........................................................................... 104

Equation 11. Thickness for Torispherical Heads ........................................................................ 104

Page 6: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

6

Equation 12. Volume of a Torispherical Head ........................................................................... 104

Equation 13. Cost of Steel for a Pressure Vessel ........................................................................ 104

Equation 14. Maximum Vapor Velocity for a Flash Drum ........................................................ 105

Equation 15. Number of Tubes in a Shell ................................................................................... 105

Page 7: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

7

Executive Summary

The use of a gas to liquid plant to produce diesel and naphtha from methane is a viable

operation to bring to market newly discovered natural gas deposits in a remote location.

Production of liquid fuels from a variety of carbon sources via synthesis gas production and

Fischer-Tropsch synthesis has been used in a variety of operations since the early 20th

century.

This design and economic analysis investigates the commercial viability of constructing a gas to

liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel and naphtha via synthesis gas

production and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis.

Synthesis gas production and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis involve the use of many

potentially harmful substances that could endanger employees and the environment if handled

improperly. It is important to ensure that all equipment design and plant layout are developed

with safety and environmental safeguards to protect employees and the environment in the event

of an emergency. All plant personal should be properly trained in the proper use of personal

safety equipment and the safe operation of equipment within the facility.

Synthesis gas production occurs at high temperatures to react methane with steam to

produce synthesis gas. The resulting synthesis gas is composed primarily of carbon monoxide

and hydrogen. The synthesis gas is then fed into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor where a

polymerization reaction takes place to form longer chain hydrocarbons. These longer chain

hydrocarbons contain LPG, naphtha, diesel, and petroleum waxes which are subsequently

separated to be sold commercially.

The proposed plant design has the potential of producing 14.6 million barrels of naphtha

and 10.5 million barrels of diesel per year. Recent trends indicate that liquid fuel prices will

continue to rise which suggests that the conversion of natural gas to liquid fuels will continue to

be viable during the lifespan of the plant. The overall efficiency of the plant is 91% and recovers

99.5% of the diesel and 98.8% of the naphtha produced in the FTR. The economic analysis

suggests that the cash flow payback period will be 2.36 years and has a DCFRR of 42.2%.

Page 8: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

8

Table 1. Economic Summary

A majority of the fixed costs for the project stem from the cost of the reactors while a

majority of the manufacturing costs are associated with separating oxygen for synthesis gas

production. Prior to the construction of the plant an investigation should be completed to

improve the conversion in reactor. If the conversion can be increased the volumetric flow

though the separation would be dramatically decreased as well as increase the efficiency of the

plant. Also, prior to construction it should be investigated that the plant’s utility grid can handle

the increase in demand associated with this process or if new facilities need to be constructed.

Plant Operation Life (years) 15

Total Capital Investment ($) 1,020,494,941.82$

Total Revenue ($/year) 2,920,420,070.88$

Total Manufacturing Costs ($/year) 2,375,953,263.52$

Net Profit ($/year) 364,792,760.93$

Cash Flow ($/year) 432,825,757.05$

DCFRR (%) 42.20%

Cash Flow Payback Period (years) 2.36

Return on Investment (%) 35.75%

Net Present Worth of Plant ($) 2,684,267,901.25$

Economics Summary

Page 9: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

9

Introduction

The recent discovery of a remote natural gas deposit has prompted an investigation into

the feasibility of a gas to liquid plant to bring these resources to market. Recent trends indicate

that rising gasoline and diesel prices in combination with abundant natural gas produces a

favorable environment for such a facility. Production of liquid fuels from a variety of carbon

sources via synthesis gas production and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis has been used in a variety of

operations since the early 20th

century. This report was compiled to determine the feasibility of a

gas to liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day to liquid fuels via synthesis gas and Fischer-

Tropsch synthesis.

Page 10: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

10

Summary

The proposed gas to liquid plant is designed to create valuable liquid fuels from remote

natural gas deposits via synthesis gas production and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Synthesis gas

production is done using steam reforming to produce carbon monoxide and hydrogen from

methane and water. This reaction is endothermic and requires a partial oxidation of methane to

maintain the desired reaction temperature. The proposed design converts 500 MSCF/Day of

natural gas to synthesis gas which is then fed into a packed-bed Fischer-Tropsch reactor where

an ultra-stable cobalt catalyst is used to polymerize long chain hydrocarbons from synthesis gas.

The product dispersion of the reaction is dependent on temperature where lower temperatures

encourage the formation of longer chain hydrocarbons. This reaction is extremely exothermic

and requires close monitoring of the reactor temperature to prevent a runaway reaction and

maintain the desired reaction temperature.

The syngas unit operates at 1950°F to increase the conversion of methane to synthesis

gas and decrease the amount of oxygen necessary to maintain the reactor temperature. The

resulting synthesis gas is used to preheat the fed to the synthesis gas unit and create steam for use

in other parts of the plant. Synthesis gas is then fed into a Fischer-Tropsch reactor that operates

at 425°F to encourage the formation of longer chain hydrocarbons. The reactor temperature is

maintained by varying the pressure on the shell side of the reactor to change the boiling

temperature of the cooling water. Products from the reactor include a wide range of

hydrocarbons including LPG, naphtha, diesel, petroleum wax, and unconverted carbon monoxide

and hydrogen. These products are then fed into a separation system that uses a series of flash

drums, distillation columns, strippers, absorbers, and decanters to separate the various products

to the desired purities. A summary of the equipment specifications can be viewed in Table 25 in

Appendix A.3.

Plant safety and environmental stewardship are major concerns taken into account in the

design of this plant. All plant employees must be trained in the proper use of personal safety

equipment and emergency response procedures. To protect the environment the venting of

hydrocarbons should be avoided during normal operations and any hydrocarbons that are not

used in the final products should be burned in a fired heater to produce steam or electricity for

the plant.

Page 11: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

11

This plant is capable of producing 14.6 million barrels of naphtha and 10.5 million

barrels of diesel per year. The separation process recovers 99.5% of the diesel and 98.8% of the

naphtha produced in the FTR and has an overall plant efficiency of 91%. Total capital

investment for the process was determined to be $1 billion by multiplying the total equipment

costs by a Lang factor of 4.8. The resulting DCFRR for the process is 42.2% with a cash flow

payback period of 2.4 years and a return on investment of 35.75% per year.

Page 12: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

12

Discussion

Process Description

The recent discovery of a remote natural gas deposit has prompted the investigation of

utilizing gas to liquid (GTL) technology to bring these resources to market. This technology

uses a synthesis gas unit to turn 500 MSCF/Day into synthesis gas that will be converted into

liquid fuels and other products using the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. The synthesis gas production

unit uses steam reforming in combination with a controlled partial oxidation of methane to

produce synthesis gas to be fed into the Fischer-Tropsch reactor. In steam reforming, steam and

methane create an equilibrium reaction to produce carbon monoxide and hydrogen. In order to

increase the temperature of the syngas unit to the desired temperature, a controlled amount of

oxygen is fed into the reactor to partially combust the methane into carbon monoxide and water.

There is an additional water-gas shift equilibrium reaction that combines carbon dioxide and

hydrogen to produce carbon monoxide and water. These reactions are shown below in reactions

1, 2, and 3.

Steam Reforming Reaction

Partial Oxidation Reaction

Water-Gas Shift Reaction

These reactions are extremely temperature dependent and a change in temperature can

dramatically change the resulting amounts of carbon monoxide and hydrogen. This makes

controlling the oxygen feed rate and thus the partial oxidation of reaction extremely important in

controlling the conversion for the syngas unit. The synthesis gas effluent is then cooled and fed

into a packed bed Fischer-Tropsch reactor with a cobalt based catalyst to create liquid fuels. The

Fischer-Tropsch reaction is a chaingrowth reaction that polymerizes alkane building blocks to

create longer chain alkanes (Yates & Satterfield, 1991). These reactions are shown below in

reactions 4 and 5

(1)

(2)

(3)

Page 13: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

13

Overall Fischer-Tropsch Reaction

( ) ⇒ ( )

Fischer-Tropsch Mechanism

⇒ ⌊ ⌋

The Fischer-Tropsch reaction is also very temperature dependent and requires close

monitoring of the reactor temperature in order to achieve the desired product distribution. Lower

temperatures encourage the formation of longer alkanes including diesel and petroleum wax,

while higher temperatures encourage the formation of methane and short chain hydrocarbons

including liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and naphtha. The temperature of the reactors is

controlled by boiling pressurized water at the desired ambient temperature to control the

reaction. The resulting reactor effluent is then fed into the separation unit where the various

products are separated.

(4)

(5)

Page 14: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

14

Equipment Design

Syngas Unit

The synthesis gas production unit uses steam reforming in combination with a controlled

partial oxidation of methane to produce synthesis gas to be fed into the Fischer-Tropsch reactor.

In steam reforming, steam and methane create an equilibrium reaction to produce carbon

monoxide and hydrogen. This reaction is very endothermic and requires high temperatures and a

large amount of energy to maintain this reaction. To operate the syngas unit at higher

temperatures beyond the maximum preheater temperatures of 1000⁰F, a partial oxidation of

methane is used to increase the temperature to an operating temperature of 1950⁰F. The amount

of oxygen fed into the reactor is closely controlled to ensure that the desired temperature is

maintained. This reaction is irreversible and it is assumed that all of the oxygen fed into the

reformer is consumed to produce carbon monoxide and water in the reaction. There is an

additional water-gas shift equilibrium reaction that combines carbon dioxide and hydrogen to

produce carbon monoxide and water. These reactions are shown below in reactions 1, 2, and 3.

Steam Reforming Reaction

Partial Oxidation Reaction

Water-Gas Shift Reaction

The synthesis gas production unit is designed to convert 500 MSCF/Day of methane into

carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Prior to being fed into the syngas unit, the feed is preheated

using a series of heat exchangers with the syngas unit effluent. These heat exchangers increase

the temperature of the feeds from 100⁰F to 1000⁰F and reduce the heating requirements for the

process. The alternative to using a heat exchanger would be to preheat the steam using fuel gas

and steam or having to combust more methane using the partial oxidation to control the syngas

unit temperature. A fired heater will still be necessary for transient states and startup procedures.

However during normal operations the heat exchangers will be sufficient to properly preheat the

feeds and will not need any additional utilities. Increasing the amount of methane being partially

(1)

(2)

(3)

Page 15: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

15

oxidized was also not pursued because the oxygen separation accounts for approximately 60% of

the variable costs for the process and was avoided to minimize the oxygen required by the syngas

unit. Separate preheat heat exchanger are provided for the oxygen and methane feeds. This is to

ensure that the methane does not prematurely combust in the heat exchangers and cause a hazard

during the operation of the plant.

The resulting syngas unit effluent composition was determined by developing a

MATLAB file that solves a series of equations to determine the carbon dioxide molar feed rate,

and the extents of the three reactions occurring in the reformer. The MATLAB code can be

viewed in Appendix A.4. This program solves an energy balance around the syngas unit to

determine the necessary extent of reaction two, the partial oxidation reaction and thus the feed

rate of oxygen, to maintain the desired temperature. It was also assumed that the desired effluent

molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide should be equal to two to produce the desired

hydrocarbons. The remaining two equations used in the program were equating the equilibrium

kinetics to the effluent concentrations of the products.

A range of syngas unit operating conditions were considered by varying the temperature,

pressure and steam to methane feed ratio. The temperature was varied between 1600⁰F and

1950⁰F while the steam to methane feed ratio was varied between 0.5 and 1.5. This optimization

can be viewed in Appendix A.5 in Figures 10 and 11 and Tables 39-42.

Due to the constraints of the equilibrium kinetics used for the steam reforming and water-

gas shift reaction, the reactor pressure could not be varied with pressure because the units that

were provided did not include pressure dependence (Wang & Michael, 2009). This means that

the partial pressures of the components could not be used to determine the syngas unit effluent

because the kinetics made it only dependent on temperature. During the design and optimization

of the syngas unit it was assumed that the lowest operating pressure would be the best for

conversion. In the equilibrium there are more moles of products being formed than reactants in

the steam reforming reaction and the water-gas shift reaction had an equal amount of moles for

the both products and reactants. This means that a lower pressure would promote the formation

of the desired products and increase the conversion of methane in the steam reforming reaction,

while a higher pressure would promote the formation of methane and would not affect the water-

gas shift reaction.

Page 16: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

16

In steam reforming, steam and methane create an equilibrium reaction with carbon

monoxide and hydrogen. At higher temperatures the equilibrium kinetics encourage the

formation of carbon monoxide and hydrogen, however this reaction very endothermic with a heat

of reaction of 209.22 kJ/gmol (89,972.08 BTU/lbmol) (Wang & Michael, 2009). At high

temperatures the amount of carbon monoxide and water formed in the reaction is reduced. The

water-gas shift reaction is normally exothermic with a heat of reaction of -42 kJ/gmol (-

17631.1581 BTU/lbmol) (Wang & Michael, 2009). However additional carbon dioxide is fed

into the syngas unit to produce more carbon monoxide and water, making this reaction

endothermic in the reformer. It was assumed that the syngas unit operated isothermally and the

only energy input into the unit came from the two equilibrium reactions and the partial oxidation

reaction occurring within the reformer. The equilibrium kinetics for these reactions is shown in

Appendix A.6 in Equations 1 and 2.

During normal operation, additional water is fed into the syngas unit at a ratio of 0.5

moles of water to every mole of methane fed into the reactor. This is done to prevent any carbon

coking that might occur and protects the unit from requiring additional heat if the carbon coke

accumulated. The additional water also serves to drive the equilibrium kinetics for the steam

reforming reaction to form more carbon monoxide and hydrogen. Additional carbon dioxide is

also fed into the syngas unit to encourage the formation of carbon monoxide and water in the

water-gas shift reaction. The carbon dioxide feed rate is closely controlled to maintain the water-

gas shift reaction to maintain a carbon monoxide to hydrogen ratio of two.

The syngas unit was optimized by trying various operating conditions and plotting the

cost of the utilities against the temperature. Oxygen was the most expensive utility due to the

amount of energy and cooling water necessary to separate the oxygen from air at a cost of

approximately $2/lbmol. The second biggest cost was carbon dioxide at approximately

$0.15/lbmol and the cost of steam was the smallest at approximately $0.09/lbmol. These graphs

can be seen in Appendix A.5 in Figures 12 and 13.

An operating temperature of 1950°F and a water to methane ratio of 0.5 proved to be the

most economical conditions for the syngas unit. At higher temperatures the amount of carbon

monoxide and hydrogen formed from the methane is dramatically increased compared to

conditions at lower temperatures. This shift in the kinetics requires less energy inputs from the

Page 17: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

17

partial oxidation and reduces the oxygen requirements for the reactor. Also, the higher

temperature requires a lower feed rate of carbon dioxide to achieve the desired hydrogen to

carbon monoxide ratio. At these temperatures more carbon dioxide is used in the water-gas shift

reaction to form more carbon monoxide and hydrogen for the same flow rate of methane. This

temperature also has the highest conversion of methane to synthesis gas and consumes more

water in the reaction. This reduces the amount of carbon dioxide and water exiting the syngas

unit makes the subsequent Fischer-Tropsch reactor smaller and reducing cost of the reactors.

Higher water to methane ratios offered a reduced oxygen flow rate however, the additional cost

of steam and carbon dioxide proved to be more expensive.

Air Separation unit

Oxygen for the syngas unit is purchased from a third party oxygen plant for $100 per

short ton of oxygen. The oxygen supplied is 99mol% oxygen and 1mol% nitrogen.

Additionally, the plant is required to provide either electricity of 600 psig steam to power the

compressors used in the separation. It was determined that the steam option was most

economical due to the ability to recycle the steam condensate to produce more steam. 400 gpm

per short ton per day of cooling water is also required by the oxygen separation and is the major

cost for the separation.

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor

Fischer-Tropsch can be used in combination with synthesis gas production to create

liquid fuels from either solids including coal, gases such as methane or other carbon sources such

as biomass. The Fischer-Tropsch reactor used in this design is a packed-bed reactor with an

ultra-stable cobalt based catalyst to polymerize the carbon monoxide and hydrogen into longer

chain hydrocarbons and water (Yates & Satterfield, 1991). This reaction occurs though the

addition of alkane building blocks to an existing chain to create longer chain alkanes (Wang &

Michael, 2009). This reaction is shown in reaction 4 and the mechanism is shown in reaction 5.

Overall Fischer-Tropsch Reaction

( ) ⇒ ( )

Fischer-Tropsch Mechanism

⇒ ⌊ ⌋

(4)

(5)

Page 18: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

18

The alkane selectivity and product distribution of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction is

dependent on temperatures. This product distribution is dictated by the Anderson-Shulz-Flory

(ASF) equation to model the distribution for the C5+ carbon alkanes while the selectivities of

methane though butane is dictated as a function of temperature. The ASF equation was specially

developed to characterize the chain growth and product distribution of alkanes in the Fischer-

Tropsch reaction. The ASF equation can be viewed in Equation 3 in Appendix A.6. The

methane though butane selectivity equations can be viewed in equations 4 and 5 in Appendix

A.6.

Since the ASF equation was not used for all of the components and the selectivity of the

C1 to C4 hydrocarbons were lower than what would be predicted by the ASF distribution, the

selectivities of the products did not sum to one. In order to correct this imbalance the sum of the

selectivities was normalized to equal one by multiplying the selectivities by a correction factor.

The selectivities were then divided by the number of carbons in that component to get the

selectivity into units of per mol of carbon monoxide fed.

The product distribution from the packed bed reactor is determined by the inlet

temperature of the reactor. A temperature range of 390⁰F to 450⁰F was examined to determine

what temperature would yield the most desirable product distribution. To determine the most

profitable operating conditions the values of the products were calculated based on the selectivity

for one mole of carbon monoxide fed. For this optimization it was assumed that the subsequent

separation operated perfect, except for the waxy components. It was assumed that a basis of

30% diesel and 70% wax by weight was fed into the hydro-isomerization unit to determine the

value of the waxy components. This optimization is shown in Figure 12 in the Appendix A.5.

Based on the optimization, the maximum potential profit from the reactor is at an

operating temperature of approximately 400⁰F, however at such lower temperatures the price of

the reactors necessary to achieve the desired conversion becomes extremely expensive compared

to higher reactor temperatures. To compare the price of a reactor to the reactor temperature, the

price reactors at various temperatures were plotted against the corresponding temperature. The

price of the reactors was determined by using the weight of the steel to price the reactors and

assuming 15 year straight line depreciation (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). The price of

catalyst was also factor in by dividing the amount of catalyst needed for the four year life and

Page 19: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

19

dividing the price over a four year span. This comparison can be seen in figure 13 in the

Appendix A.5.

A balance between reactor size and potential product was determined to be around a

reactor temperature of 425⁰F. At this temperature the reactor has the potential to produce an

additional $108 million per year in potential product compared to the highest operating

temperature of 450⁰F. This temperature was chosen because the slope of the revenue per year

decreases as it approaches the optimum temperature. Also, the estimated yearly cost of the

reactor for this temperature was less than half of the cost of a reactor at the optimum

temperature. At the optimum operating temperature of 400⁰F the additional product value

produced is approximately equal to the cost of the new reactors and does not justify the

additional cost.

Modeling of the temperature, conversion, pressure drop, and product accumulation for

the reactor was done using a MATLAB program to model a single tube within the reactor. It

was assumed that all of the tubes within the reactor system would behave similarly the modeled

tube. The MATLAB file solved for three separate differential equations using ode15. The

conversion for a single tube was modeled using the design equation for a packed-bed reactor

(Fogler, 2008). This equation is shown in Equation 6 in Appendix A.4.

The reaction rate for the conversion of synthesis gas to liquid fuels using the Fischer-

Tropsch model was determined to be best fit by the Langmuir-Hinshelwood rate equation. The

rate equation is shown below in Equation 7 in Appendix A.6. It was assumed that the vapor

phase within the reactor contains all of the hydrogen, carbon monoxide, water, methane, and

nitrogen components and 70% of the moles for C2+ hydrocarbons for every mol of CH4 made.

To account for this formation of liquid products within the reactor is was assumed that the total

pressure drop within the reactor was 1.5 times the gas phase pressure drop. It was also assumed

that the density and viscosity of the components was constant though the reactor. The pressure

drop within the reactor was modeled using the Ergun equation because it is analytical equation to

determine the pressure drop in packed-bed reactors (Fogler, 2008). This equation is shown below

in Equation 8 in Appendix A.6.

Page 20: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

20

The temperature gradient within the tubes in the reactor was modeled using an energy

balance (Fogler, 2008). This equation is shown in Equation 9 in Appendix A.6. It was assumed

that the shell side of the reactor operated isothermally and that all of the energy from the reactor

was used to vaporize water in the shell of the reactor. The vaporization of water allows the

ambient temperature of the reactor to be assumed constant and that there is no external

temperature gradients.

Since the temperatures of the components within the tubes were not constant, the

MATLAB file was designed to incorporate heat capacity calculations that would vary with the

internal temperature of the tube. This would allow for more accurate analysis of the reactor

design to account for potential problems that could arise from limitations in the heat transfer of

the tubes. The Fischer-Tropsch reaction is extremely exothermic with a heat of reaction of

70,200 BTU per lbmol of carbon monoxide. If the temperature in the shell of the reactor is not

maintained at the desired operating temperature there is a serious risk of a runaway reaction.

The cooling water for the reactor is preheated to a saturation liquid and pressurized to the

desired pressure before being fed into the reactor. Condensed steam was chosen as the cooling

water because it is already preheated near the desired temperature and is 99.9% pure water. This

is to ensure that the shell of the reactor will not corrode or accumulate any solids that might

hinder the heat transfer capability of the reactor. The boiling temperature of the water is

controlled by changing the pressure inside of the shell. In case of emergency, the pressure of the

shell can be lowered to reduce the boiling temperature of the reactor and cold water can be fed

in. This will cause the water to boil at a lower temperature, cooling the reactor and stopping the

reaction. Once the cooling water is vaporized it can then be used as process steam in other

processes.

Heat transfer within the reactor is a major concern, during the optimization of the reactor

a variety of tube sizes were investigated to determine which tube size could provide an

economical surface area to volume ratio. A larger tube diameter would reduce the number of

tubes necessary to contain the desired amount of catalyst, but offers poor heat transfer from the

tube. A small tube diameter allows for greater heat transfer and temperature control however,

the amount of catalyst within a tube is limited and thus requires a larger number tubes. A 1.25

inch diameter tube was chosen because this offers a balance between heat transfer area and

Page 21: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

21

catalyst volume. The larger heat transfer area allows the ambient temperature of the cooling

water to be higher and help facilitate the reaction when it slows down near the end of the reactor.

Due to the higher concentrations of carbon monoxide and hydrogen at the inlet of the reactor, the

reaction proceeds much quicker than at the end of the reactor where there are fewer reactants

present. This can be seen in Figure 14 in the Appendix A.5.

An ambient temperature of 405.1⁰F was chosen because it allows for a buffer region

before the reaction becomes a runaway reaction while maintaining a high enough temperature to

encourage the reaction to be completed within a reasonable amount of catalyst. This temperature

also keeps the reactor within the 390⁰F to 450⁰F operating range where the methane selectivity is

applicable. Since approximately 45% of the conversion occurred within the hotter portion of the

reactor and the remaining 45% of the conversion occurred in the cooler portion of the reactor, it

was assumed that the product distribution would not be affected by the fluctuations of

temperatures within the reactor. It was then acceptable to assume that the inlet temperature of

the reactor dictated the product distribution from the reactor. The temperature profile of the

reactor can be seen in figure 16 in Appendix A.5.

Typical conversions for Fischer-Tropsch range between 11-70% for a bench scale reactor

(Yates & Satterfield, 1991). The conversion within the full-scale reactor was truncated at

approximately 91% to account for any possible improvements in conversion that might be

associated with scale. However complete conversion is possible based on the reaction kinetics

however, this was avoided to ensure that the subsequent separations could handle possibly large

flows of carbon monoxide and hydrogen though the system. Additionally it was assumed that

the desired molar ratio of hydrogen to carbon monoxide was two however, in actuality it will

need to be slightly higher than two to account for the additional hydrogen molecules at the ends

of the alkanes. This would make hydrogen the limiting reactant for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction

and there would be unreacted carbon monoxide present in the product stream.

An operating pressure of 300 psig was chosen for the Fischer-Tropsch Reactor to

eliminate the cost of compressing the vapors from the syngas unit to a higher pressure. It was

determined that the operating pressure of the Fischer-Tropsch reactor did not have a major effect

on the conversion and that operating the synthesis gas unit at a lower pressure would be more

cost effective for the process. The pressure drop within the reactor is a major concern due to the

Page 22: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

22

decrease in moles from the polymerization of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction and the condensation

of the larger hydrocarbons. The maximum allowable pressure drop was assumed to 50 psi per

reactor. This maximum pressure drop limited the length and the maximum vapor velocity

though the reactors. To minimize the pressure drop within the reactors, the reactors were

arranged in parallel to increase the surface area of the tubes and decrease the superficial gas

velocity though the tubes. Since there was only a 50 psi pressure drop though the reactor,

further pressurization was not necessary in the subsequent separations to separate the heavier

hydrocarbons from the lighter components.

The catalyst being used for this process is an ultra-stable cobalt based catalyst that has

low deactivation rates. This catalyst has a packed bulk density of 0.8 g/cm3 (49.94 blm/ft

3) with a

void fraction of 0.4. The catalyst is assumed to be replaced every 4 years of operation and costs

$10/lbm to purchase. The choice of a cobalt based catalyst improves the alkane selectivity of the

reactor because this catalyst is not very active in the water-gas shift reaction and is thus less

likely to convert water to carbon dioxide compared to iron based catalysts (Yates & Satterfield,

1991).

It was determined that the Fischer-Tropsch Reactor unit requires a total of 43 reactors

arranged in parallel to control the pressure drop within the reactor and achieve the desired

conversion. These reactors are 20 feet in diameter and are 41 feet in length. Each reactor

contains approximately 9,552, 1.25 inch, 16 gauge tubes arranged in an equilateral triangle

configuration (McCabe, Smith, & Harriott, 2005). This configuration allows for the maximum

number of tubes to be placed within a shell while maintaining the desired spacing of 1 inch in-

between tubes. The minimum shell wall thickness was designed based on the ASME Boiler and

Pressure Vessel Code (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). It was assumed that the reactors

would have a 3mm corrosion allowance, a joint efficiency of 0.85 for spot examined, electric

resistance weld, and be made from 316 stainless with a maximum allowable working stress for

operation up to 343°C (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). The minimum shell wall thickness

was calculated to be 4 inches (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). ASME torispherical heads

were chosen for the ends of the reactor to reduce the costs of the reactor (Peters, Timmerhaus, &

West, 2003). Sample calculations for this are shown in Equations 10-12 in the Appendix A.6.

Page 23: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

23

Stainless steel was chosen for the material of construction in order to prevent corrosion to

the system during operation. Even though a majority of the products produced during Fishcer-

Tropsch are n-alkanes there is potential to form reactive alkenes that might harm the reactor.

The reactor was priced using the weight of steel within the reactor (Yates & Satterfield, 1991).

The price of carbon steel was estimated using a correlation for the price of a pressure vessel,

however this correlation is only effective in a weight range from 400 to 50,000 kg (Peters,

Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). For these reactors the price of steel was assumed to be at the

higher end of this range with the price of steel for 50,000 kg of steel. The price of carbon steel

was then multiplied by a cost factor of three to account for the higher price of stainless steel

(Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). A pressure factor of 2.4 was also applied to the cost of the

reactor to account for the pressures of boiling water in the shell (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West,

2003). The final cost of a single reactor was determined to be $2.6 million dollars per reactor or

$112.9 million for the entire system of reactors.

Hydro-Isomerization Unit

The hydro-isomerization unit isomerizes paraffins and petroleum wax is converted into

LPG, naphtha, and diesel. The hydro-isomerization unit converts 100% of the greater than

700°F boiling point material to lighter components. This catalyst is very selective to the greater

than 700°F boiling point material and less is not selective to the less than 700°F boiling point

materials. However, the catalyst is sensitive to water and carbon monoxide and will deactivate

the catalyst. Prior to the hydro-isomerization unit all of the carbon monoxide and water is

removed from the petroleum wax. The hydro-isomerization unit has an overall selectivity of

1.0% wt% methane, 0.5wt% ethane, 3.5wt% propane, and the balance is diesel.

Product Separations

For simplicity the separation of this process was modeled assuming that all of the naphtha

and diesel behaved as a pseduocomponent within the separation. This assumption was made to

simplify the separation and because NRTL predicted that various hydrocarbons formed multiple

azeotropes with water. However, these azeotropes could not be independently verified in

literature and could have a drastic effect on the separation. Additionally, non-random two liquid

(NRTL) model was used to model the separation due to the large amount of water present in the

Page 24: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

24

system. Prior to the construction of the proposed plant, a more rigorous investigation should be

completed to ensure that the separation will operate as intended.

Due to the lower operating temperature of the reactor, very little LPG was produced in

the reaction. The low quantity and value of LPG made it uneconomical to recover LPG from the

system due to the extreme condition necessary to separate LPG from methane, carbon monoxide

and hydrogen. All of the LPG produced by the plant comes from petroleum wax in the hydro-

isomerization unit. It is recommended that prior to the construction of the proposed plant that

further investigation of LPG recovery should be undertaken.

Diesel and Wax Separation

The heavier hydrocarbons that have boiling points greater than 350°F must be kept above

250°F prior to the hydro-isomerization unit to prevent wax crystallization within the equipment.

This fraction includes all of the C20+ hydrocarbons including diesel and petroleum wax. After

the Fischer-Tropsch reactor, the reactor effluent is immediately flashed at conditions similar to

the exiting reactor conditions to separate a majority of the heavier compounds. The reactor

effluent is adiabatically flashed at 408.5°F and 265.4 psia in a cluster of six flash drums. These

flash drums were sized assuming a 10 minute liquid hold up or the maximum vapor velocity to

determine the tank diameter. The height to diameter ratio was assumed to be 3. These equations

are shown in Equation 14 in the Appendix A.6 (Cheresources, 2008). Due to the large

volumetric flow rate in the system, many of the flash drum sizes needed to be broken into

smaller flash drums in order to have a realistic size. These flash drums were priced using the

price of steel similar to the sizing of the reactor. Again stainless steel was used to minimize

potential corrosion. A breakdown of the flash drum sizing and economics are shown in Table 28

in the Appendix A.3.

After this flash the liquid stream is combined with other heavy streams from other flash

drums in the vapor portion of the separation. The resulting stream is throttled down to 1 atm and

combined with more heavy products from the naphtha process streams. The resulting stream is

then preheated in a heat exchanger with the vapor stream from the first flash before is fed into a

vacuum distillation column. Steam ejectors are used in the vacuum distillation column to

maintain an operating pressure around 60mmHg. The use of a vacuum distillation allows the

waxy components to be separated from the diesel prior to being fed into the hydro-isomerization

Page 25: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

25

unit without causing the waxy products to coke. This vacuum distillation completely separates

the diesel from the waxy components and increases the efficiency of the hydro-isomerization

unit so that only the waxy components are fed into the unit. The feed into the hydro-

isomerization unit is 100mol% petroleum wax. A process flow diagram for the diesel and wax

separation is shown in Figure 5 of Appendix A.1.

The first vacuum distillation column is 25 feet in diameter and has 14 stages with 2 foot

spacing in-between stages. Stainless steel was used for the construction material for the vacuum

distillation column to prevent possible corrosion. The reboiler is heated by a fired heater using

fuel gas in order to reach the temperatures necessary to separate the diesel from the waxy

components (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). The condenser is cooled using cooling water

and was sized as a heat exchanger (Peters, Timmerhaus, & West, 2003). It was assumed that the

price of this distillation column would be three times as expensive as a distillation column

operating at atmospheric pressure. The price of this vacuum distillation column is $5.2 million.

A summary of the distillation column sizing and costing can be seen in Table 30 in the Appendix

A.3.

The distillate from the first vacuum distillation column contains primarily diesel and a

small amount of naphtha. Naphtha is separated from the diesel in a second vacuum distillation

column to increase the purity of the diesel and recover the naphtha. The naphtha in the distillate

is then pressurized to atmospheric pressure in a compressor and combined with naphtha from the

naphtha recovery process. Diesel from the second vacuum distillation is 100mol% diesel. This

vacuum distillation column is 25.8 feet in diameter and has 8 stages with 2 foot spacing in

between. The reboiler is heated using 600 psig steam from the plant while the condenser is

cooled using cooling water. This second vacuum distillation column costs $2.3 million to

purchase.

Naphtha Separation

The naphtha separation involves the removal the water and vapors from the naphtha.

After the Fischer-Tropsch reactor effluent is flashed, the vapor stream is used to preheat the feed

into the first vacuum distillation column and the feed to the sixth flash drum. This stream is then

further cooled to 365°F by vaporizing medium pressure steam condensate to produce steam to be

used in the plant. The vapors are then flashed again in a second adiabatic flash at 265.4 psia.

Page 26: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

26

This second flash drum removes a portion of the residual diesel and is combined with the feed to

the vacuum distillation columns to be recovered. After this second flash, the vapor is cooled to

260°F in a heat exchanger with low pressure steam condensate to produce low pressure steam

and then flashed a third time in a decanter and flash drum to remove water from the vapor

stream.

The vapors from this flash drum are cooled with cooling water to 250°F and adiabatically

flashed and decanted in the fourth flash drum to recover any diesel that is present in the system.

The water from the decanter is combined with other waste water streams to be purified. Vapors

from the fourth flash drum are cooled to 95°F using cooling water and adiabatically flashed and

decanted in the fifth flash drum to separate the vapors from the waste water and naphtha. The

waste water phase is combined with other waste water steams to be purified while the naphtha is

refrigerated to 10°F and then used as an absorbent to remove naphtha from the vapor steam in an

absorber. This absorber recovers an additional 14,000 lbm per hour of naphtha that would

otherwise be used as fuel gas. The resulting naphtha stream is then decanted and mixed with

other naphtha streams. A process flow diagram for the naphtha separation is shown in Figure 6

of Appendix A.1.

The water recovered from the third flash drum is combined with other waste water

streams to be purified while the naphtha and diesel from the liquid stream is heated in a heat

exchanger with the vapors from the first flash to 381°F and then adiabatically flashed to

atmospheric pressure. This sixth flash drum separates the diesel from the naphtha and water.

The diesel is then fed into the diesel recovery and the naphtha vapors are then cooled in a heat

exchanger with cooling water to 235°F and adiabatically flashed in the seventh flash drum. The

liquid stream from this flash drum is fed into the diesel recovery and the naphtha vapors are

mixed with the other naphtha streams.

Naphtha from the diesel and wax separation is mixed with the naphtha from the seventh

flash drum and from the decanter. The resulting stream is then cooled in a heat exchanger with

water to 95°F and adiabatically flashed and decanted. This purifies the naphtha stream to

98.6mol% naphtha. The vapor stream from the flash drum still contains a small portion of

naphtha and is then compressed to 265.4 psia and recycled back into the absorber to recover the

naphtha.

Page 27: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

27

Waste Water and Fuel Gas Purification

The vapor stream from the fifth flash drum contains primarily carbon monoxide,

hydrogen, methane, and C2-C4 hydrocarbons. This stream is then cooled using cooling water to

95°F and run through an absorber to remove a portion of the remaining naphtha. The scrubbed

vapors are then throttled to 1 atm and heated to 90°F using a heat exchanger with the waste water

stream. This stream is then fed into a stripper where the gas is used as a stripping agent to

remove volatile hydrocarbons from the waste water. The vapors leaving the stripper are burned

as a fuel gas to power a fired heater to produce steam or electricity.

Waste water produced in the plant is accumulated and then throttled to 1 atm. This water

is then cooled to 95°F in a heat exchanger with cooling water and fed into a stripper. The

stripper uses the fuel gas stream to removes a majority of the volatile hydrocarbons that might be

present in the waste water. It is important to remove these hydrocarbons before they are returned

to the plant’s cooling towers due to the possibility of these hydrocarbons vaporizing in the

cooling process. The resulting water stream is then fed into another stripper where air is blown

in using a blower to remove any remaining volatile hydrocarbons that might be present in the

water. This vapor stream is then used as air to be burned in a fired heater with the fuel gas. The

purified water is 99.4% pure water by volume and can be used as cooling water in the rest of the

plant.

Additional air maybe needed to power the fired heater because the concentration of fuel

gas to air is only 40%. The upper flammability limit of carbon monoxide and hydrogen are 75%

by volume and can be combusted using this volume ratio however, the upper flammability limits

for methane, ethane, propane, and butane are 15%, 12.4% 10.1% and 8.41% respectively. It is

important to ensure that all of the hydrocarbons are completely combusted to prevent any

possible hydrocarbon releases into the surrounding area.

Heat Integration

A majority of the heat produced by this process comes from the partial combustion of

oxygen in the synthesis gas production unit. This makes it difficult to find cold streams that need

to be heated within the process, so a majority of the heat integration in the system comes from

the production of steam that can be used in other processes. A summary of heat exchanger

equipment can be viewed in Tables 26 and 27 in Appendix A.3.

Page 28: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

28

The feed to the synthesis gas production unit is preheated using a heat exchanger with the

effluent. This makes it so that a fired preheater is only needed during transient and startup

conditions. During normal operations the heat exchanger can provide all of the duty necessary to

preheat the feed.

Following the FTR, the reactor effluent is flashed in a flash drum where the vapor stream

is used to preheat the feed into the vacuum distillation column. This heat exchanger preheats the

feed to 410°F and partially vaporizes the feed. The heat exchanger reduces the duty on the

reboiler of the vacuum distillation column as well as the column diameter. After the vapor

stream is used to preheat the vacuum distillation column it is used to preheat the feed into the

sixth flash drum. This allows the subsequent flash to occur adiabatically and helps to separate

the naphtha from the diesel.

After the absorber the vapor stream is heated using the waste water stream. This heat

exchanger reduces the cooling water requirements to cool the waste water while also heating the

vapor stream. Heating the vapor stream makes the vapors a better scrubbing material for the

waste water and helps to vaporize the volatile hydrocarbons present in the waste water.

Partial condensers are used in both distillation columns to reduce the condenser duties

and raise the condenser temperatures on these columns. The lower condenser duties require less

cooling water and the condensers can be smaller due to the increased temperature difference.

Rather than separate the reactor effluent into multiple streams, the process is designed as one

separation unit to allow the distillation columns and other major pieces of equipment to be larger

to reduce the price of the equipment.

A majority of the heat integration was done in the form of steam generation thought out

the process. Following the syngas unit the synthesis gas needs to be cooled from 1950°F to

425°F. After the synthesis gas is used to preheat the feed, it is used to create high pressure and

low pressure steam in a series of heat exchangers. Following these heat exchangers an additional

1.9 million lbm of high pressure steam and 133.5 thousand lbm of medium pressure steam are

produced per hour. Additionally after the vapor stream from the first flash is used to preheat the

feeds into the vacuum distillation column and the sixth flash there is still enough heat to generate

35 thousand lbm of medium pressure steam per hour. Following the second flash drum, low

Page 29: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

29

pressure steam condensate is used to cool the vapor steam to produce an additional 900 thousand

lbm of low pressure steam per hour.

Cooling water was also integrated into the system to reduce the size of the heat

exchangers used in to cool various streams. Cooling water is used to cool the streams that are

needed to be cooled to low temperatures first. After these streams are sufficiently cooled, the

same cooling water is used in later heat exchangers that allow for higher temperatures

differences in these heat exchangers. This increases the temperature difference in the low

temperature heat exchangers because of the much higher flow rate of cooling water and

decreases the surface area needed by these heat exchangers. The later heat exchangers have such

a large temperature difference already that the slight increase in the inlet temperature of the

cooling water does not affect the size of these heat exchangers.

Plant Economics

The expected service life for the plant is expected to be 15 years and has a total capital

investment of $1.02 billion. The total capital investment for the project was calculated by

multiplying the total equipment cost of $212 million by a Lang factor of 4.8. This Lang factor

accounts for any associated direct costs, indirect costs, and working capital. A summary of the

equipment costs can be viewed in Table 25 of Appendix A.2.

A stream factor of 0.92 was applied to the process to account for one month turn around

for catalyst replacement in the Fischer-Tropsch Reactors. The proposed plant design has the

potential of producing 14.6 million barrels of naphtha, 10.5 million barrels of diesel, and 4.2

million pounds of LPG per year. This amounts to an annual revenue of $2 billion with an

additional $879 million from credits. Variable costs including raw materials and utility costs for

the plant account for $1.8 billion per year. A breakdown of the plant economics is shown in

Table 19 of Appendix A.2.

Fixed costs for the plant include yearly operating expenses, depreciation, and the hydro-

isomerization unit and syngas unit capital recovery. The year operating expenses is expected to

be 3% of the total capital investment to cover fixed charges such as plant overhead costs,

administrative costs, distribution and marketing, and research and development. Depreciation

was calculated using straight line depreciation with no salvage value for the service life of the

Page 30: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

30

plant. To cover the cost of purchasing the hydro-isomerization unit and syngas unit, the capital

recovery of this equipment was estimated to be $100 million and $400 million respectively. This

brought the total manufacturing costs to $2.4 billion. A summary of the utilities and credits for

various process units can be seen in Table 20 in Appendix A.2

A tax rate of 33% was applied to the gross profit to calculate a net profit of $365 million

per year. The cash flow was then calculated to be $433 million each year with a DCFRR of

42.2% and a cash flow payback period of 2.36 year. The plant offers a return on investment of

be 35.75% per year with a net present worth of the plant of $2.6 billion, assuming an 8% interest

rate. A summary of the Economics can be viewed in Table 24 of Appendix A.4

A sensitivity analysis for the plant was also calculated to determine the how the plant

economics would respond to variations in product price, capital investment, utility, and raw

material costs. It was determined that the product costs had the largest effect on the economics

of the plant. A decrease in produce price of 20% could severely hurt the profitability of the

plant. Utilities and raw materials accounted for a slight change in the profitability of the plant

but even with a 50% increase in the utility or raw material costs the plant will still be profitable.

The fixed capital remained relatively constant throughout the analysis. The sensitivity analysis

can be viewed in Figure 9 of Appendix A.2

Inflation was assumed to be a constant 3% per year for the lifespan of the plant. The

appreciation of the products and manufacturing costs helped improve the profitability of the

plant. However, inflation does not have an effect on the time value of money and does not affect

depreciation or the net present worth of the plant. A summary of the inflation can be viewed in

Table 22 in Appendix A.2.

Page 31: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

31

Material and Energy Balance Discussion

Material and energy balances were performed though the development of the system to

ensure that the number of carbons and oxygen were constant though out the system. However in

the design of the Fischer-Tropsch reactor is was assumed that for every mole of carbon

consumed, two moles of hydrogen were consumed. This assumption is not accurate since in the

formation of alkanes two additional hydrogen molecules are necessary to complete the reaction.

To account this, a hydrogen balance was not used to measure the mass in this system. A

summary of the material and energy balances can be seen in the stream tables in Appendix A.1.

The carbon balances around the synthesis gas unit and the Fischer-Tropsch reactor close

to 99.15% while the oxygen balance closes to 100%. Also the carbon efficiency for the system

was calculated assuming that the composition of the naphtha and diesel streams within the

separation maintained the same composition as the FTR effluent. The carbon efficiency of the

system was determined by summing the mass of carbon in the finished products (LPG, Diesel,

and Naphtha) and dividing it by the mass of carbon in the methane feed. Though a carbon

balance the system’s carbon efficiency was determined to 91.3%. A majority of the carbon lost

from the system was burned in the fired heater as carbon monoxide, methane or LPG. The

separation process recovers 99.5% of the diesel and 98.8% of the naphtha produced in the FTR

and has a plant of 91%. If a higher conversion is possible, more liquid products could be

produce which would improve the carbon efficiency of the process. The material balances can

be viewed in Tables 43 and 44 in Appendix A.5 and a summary of the efficiency can be viewed

in Table 23 of Appendix A.2.

Page 32: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

32

Safety and Environmental Summary

It is imperative that every precaution be taken to prevent possible leaks and ensure the

safe operation of the equipment and maintain the safety of employees, the community, and the

environment. This process involves many pieces of equipment that operate at high temperatures

and pressures, in the event of an emergency the plant should be immediately shut down and the

proper action should be taken. It is recommended that plant employees wear person protective

equipment when handling equipment and take the required safety training before working with

or near equipment.

The synthesis gas production unit has operates at a temperature of 1950°F and requires

special attention when performing maintenance and during normal operations. It should be

ensured that the area around the syngas unit is properly marked and cordoned off to prevent any

potential burns that might occur if an employee were to come into contact with the equipment.

The syngas effluent is cooled in a series of heat exchangers that should be properly insulated to

maintain energy efficiency and prevent potential hazards to employees.

The Fischer-Tropsch Reactor has the potential to cause a runaway reaction if the reactor

conditions are not properly maintained. Failsafe valves and close process controls are used to

maintain the reactor conditions and should be regularly inspected and maintained to ensure the

proper measurements are being made. Additionally, the shells and tubes of the reactor should be

inspected whenever necessary to clean away any potential buildup on the tubes that might disrupt

heat transfer of the reactor. In the event of an emergency, the pressure within the reactor should

be dropped to atmospheric pressure and cold cooling water should be used to quench the reaction

immediately. Employees should be trained in emergency and evacuation procedures.

The emission of volatile hydrocarbons should be minimized wherever possible. Methane

has the greenhouse gas potential of 21 times that of carbon monoxide while lighter hydro

carbons are known to produce smog (Agency, 2003). Additionally heavier hydrocarbons can

contaminate the soil and surrounding waterways if released into the environment (Agency,

2003). All plant vessels should have secondary containment in the event of a spill to prevent

endangering the environment.

Page 33: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

33

This process also involves many chemicals that could be hazardous to employee’s health

and safety if not handled properly. A majority of the components within the system are

flammable and potentially explosive at certain conditions. Every precaution should be taken to

ensure that potential ignition sources are kept away from hazardous areas where explosions

could occur. Additionally, operations and employee offices should be located in safe locations

that would not be endangered in the case of emergency whenever possible. Listed below are

chemicals used in the system and the possible hazards they might present.

Methane

Methane is defined as an asphyxiant and personal protective equipment should be used in

case of a leak. In the event of a leak the area should be secured and immediately contact

emergency personnel. The flow of methane should be stopped as soon as possible to contain the

leak if it can be done safely. Methane forms explosive or flammable mixtures with oxygen and

other oxidizers. In case of fire water, carbon dioxide, or dry chemical should be used to

extinguish the blaze. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Methane)

Oxygen

Oxygen is an asphyxiant and an oxidizer. In the event of a release, it is important to

secure the area, use personal protective equipment as soon as possible and contact emergency

personnel. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Oxygen, 2011)

Carbon Dioxide

Carbon dioxide is an asphyxiant and personal protective equipment should be used in

case of a leak. In the event of a leak, the area should be secured and immediately contact

emergency personal. If possible the leak should be immediately contained if it is safe to do so.

(Material and Safety Data Sheet: Carbon Dioxide, 2005)

Carbon Monoxide

Carbon monoxide is extremely toxic and could be fatal if inhaled. Personal protection

equipment should be worn around areas containing carbon monoxide. Carbon monoxide is

extremely flammable and could cause flash fires. In the event of a leak the area should be

Page 34: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

34

secured and immediately contact emergency personnel. In case of fire, water spray, foam or dry

chemical should be used to extinguish the blaze. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Carbon Monoxide,

2010)

Hydrogen

Hydrogen is an asphyxiant and personal protective equipment should be worn in the

event of a leak. Hydrogen is flammable over a wide range of concentrations in air and burns

with an almost invisible flame. In the event of fire use water, dry chemical, or carbon monoxide

to extinguish the blaze. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Hydrogen, 1996)

Ethane

Ethane is extremely flammable and personal protection equipment should be worn in

areas where exposure to ethane is possible. In the event of a leak the area should be secured and

immediately contact emergency personnel. In case of fire, water spray, foam or dry chemical

should be used to extinguish the blaze. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Ethane, 2010)

Propane

Propane is an asphyxiant and is extremely flammable. Personal protection equipment

should be worn in areas where exposure is possible. In the event of a leak the area should be

secured and immediately contact emergency personnel. In case of fire, water spray, foam or dry

chemical should be used to extinguish the blaze. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Propane, 2010)

Butane

Propane is an asphyxiant and is extremely flammable. Personal protection equipment

should be worn when handling butane. In the event of a leak the area should be secured and

immediately contact emergency personnel. In case of fire, water spray, foam or dry chemical

should be used to extinguish the blaze. Use proper disposal procedures in the event of a spill.

(Material Safety Data Sheet: N-Butane, 2010)

Page 35: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

35

Naphtha

Naphtha is a known irritant and is extremely flammable. Personal protection equipment

should be worn when handling naphtha. In the event of a spill the area should be secured and

emergency personnel should be contacted. Avoid spreading the spill and use an inert absorbent

to absorb the spill. Use proper disposal procedures to contain the spill. In the event of a five,

use water, foam or dry chemical to extinguish the blaze (Material Safety Data Sheet: Naphtha,

2010).

Diesel

Diesel is a sever skin and eye irritant and is an asphyxiant. Personal protection

equipment should be worn when handling diesel. Diesel is also extremely flammable and should

be stored away from potential sources of ignition. In the event of a spill the area should be

secured and immediately contact emergency personnel. In case of fire, water spray, foam or dry

chemical should be used to extinguish the blaze. In the event of a spill, proper disposal and

cleanup procedures should be used (Material Safety Data Sheet: Diesel, 2002)

Petroleum Wax

Petroleum Wax can be a skin or eye irritant and can cause thermal burns if ignited. While not

considered “flammable” or “combustible” the material will burn if ignited. If a fire does occur,

use water spray, foam, carbon dioxide or dry chemical to extinguish the blasé. Use proper

disposal and cleanup procedures in the event of a spill. (Material Safety Data Sheet: Petroleum

Wax, 2007)

Page 36: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

36

Unit Control and Instrumentation Description

Process control for the syngas unit is maintained by varying the flow rates of various

streams into the syngas unit to control the feed temperature, operating temperature, H2 to CO

ratio, conversion, and operating pressure. For these streams the fail safe for the control valves

would be fail close in order to cut off the fed into the syngas unit to stop the reaction.

Additional, block valves are placed before and after the syngas unit to close in the event of an

emergency. If pressure is building within the reactor a pressure relief valve is used to alleviate

the pressure back to the desired pressure.

The Fischer-Tropsch reactor is controlled primarily by using the shell side pressure to

change the boiling temperature of water within the shell. This method is used to control the

reactor temperature and conversion. For the inlet streams for the reactor have control valves

with a fail close failsafe. Block valves are also used to block off a reactor in case of emergency.

The control valve for the reactor pressure is designed to fail open in order to drop the pressure

within the reactor shell. This will cause the boiling temperature of water to decrease, decreasing

the temperature of the water within the shell, stopping the reaction. Additionally, the control

valve for the flow rate of water into the jacket has a fail open valve to ensure that in the event of

an emergency the reactor will still be contained in cooling water to prevent a runaway reaction.

The type of control primarily used in this system is PI Control. PI Control offers the

most responsive control type for these types of systems because it has no offset and low

oscillations. Pressure relief valves are also placed on a majority of the process equipment to

ensure that excessive pressure will not cause the unit to rupture and potentially harm employees.

A summary of the unit control and instrumentation can be viewed in Tables 35-38 in Appendix

A.3.

Page 37: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

37

Conclusions

The proposed gas to liquid plant has the potential to economically bring to market remote

natural gas deposits by producing liquid fuels from natural gas. This plant design has the

potential of producing 14.6 million barrels of naphtha, 10.5 million barrels of diesel, and 4.2

million pounds of LPG per year with an annual revenue of $2 billion with an additional $879

million from credits. The product streams produce 100mol% petroleum wax to be converted

into desirable products in the hydro-isomerization unit and 100mol% diesel along with 98.6%

pure naphtha following the separation.

The plant’s efficiency was determined to 91.3% with a majority of the carbon lost from

the system being burned in the fired heater as carbon monoxide, methane or LPG. LPG is

burned with methane and any unreacted carbon monoxide and hydrogen in a fired heater to

ensure that no volatile hydrocarbons are released into the surroundings. The separation process

recovers 99.5% of the diesel and 98.8% of the naphtha produced in the FTR and has a plant of

91%. Waste water produced by the system is stripped of any volatile hydrocarbons that might

vaporize in the plant’s cooling towers to ensure that the process does not endanger the

environment.

Safety is a major concern in the design of the plant and proper safety training in the use

of personal protection equipment is mandatory. Control valves and proper instrumentation is

used to control the process and prevent the potential for emergencies. In the event of an

emergency the temperature of the cooling water within the shell can be reduced by lowering the

pressure within the shell and stopping the reaction.

Though the preliminary design it was determined that the process has a DCRFF of 42.2%

and return on investment of 2.36 years. Recent trends indicate that liquid fuels prices including

naphtha and diesel will continue to increase in coming years while natural gas prices will

decline. The production of liquid fuels from natural gas could offer a chance to produce higher

value products at remote locations. This plant has the potential to safely and economically bring

remote natural gas deposits to market as valuable liquid fuels.

Page 38: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

38

Recommendations

The use of pseduocomponents in the separation is a board assumption and does not

account for possible interactions between these compounds. The NRTL thermodynamic model

predicts that there are multiple azeotropes within the system that could cause a potential problem

in separating the products leaving the FTR. Prior to the construction of the plant a more rigorous

investigation into the separation could be performed to ensure the viability of the plant.

Increasing the number of reactors in the plant could reduce the service factor. Currently

there are 43 reactors in series and one month of downtime is needed to coincide with catalyst

replacement. If additional reactors were added to the system, a section of reactors could be taken

out of service while the process is still in operation. However, prior to adding this to the design

it should be determined if it conditions will be safe to perform maintenance within the reactors

while the rest of the plant is in operation.

A major obstacle for this process is the incomplete conversion of the carbon monoxide

and hydrogen in the reactor. If the reactor can be designed to achieve near complete conversion

the capital and utility costs associated with the costly separation of products from the vapors

phase could be drastically reduced. Additionally if the amount of carbon monoxide and

hydrogen were reduced the recovery of LPG could become more economically viable and add an

additional source of revenue for the plant as well as increase the efficiency of the plant.

To improve the plant efficiency there are a few flash drums that require a large volume

due to the small amount of liquid recovered in these flash drums. The potential removal of these

flash drums could reduce the capital investment of the project, however the effects of the

removal of these flash drums on the subsequent separation and the environment.

Page 39: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

39

Project Premises and Assumptions

Synthesis Gas Production Unit Assumptions

Oxygen fed into the syngas unit is completely combusted

Equilibrium constants for the steam reforming reaction and water-gas shift reaction did not

depend on temperature

The syngas unit would operate most efficiently at lower pressures

The desired hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio was 2

The syngas unit operated isothermally

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Assumptions

The 30% diesel and 70% wax would be fed into the hydro-isomerization unit to optimize the

reactor costs

The price of carbon steel was the same as the maximum weight in the range to price steel

All tubes within the reactor behaved the same as the tube being modeled

The vapor phase in the reactor contained all of the hydrogen, carbon monoxide, water,

methane, nitrogen, and 70% of the other components

The total pressure drop is 1.5 the calculated pressure drop to account for the condensation of

components within the reactor

Shell side of the reactor operated isothermally

Ambient shell temperature is constant

Inlet temperature of the reactor determined the product distribution

The stoicometric coefficient for hydrogen in the Fischer-Tropsch reaction was 2

HI Unit Assumptions

The less than 700°F boiling point material is not affected in the HI Unit

Separation Assumptions

Naphtha and diesel behave as pseduocomponent within the separation

Assumed a heat transfer coefficient for heat exchangers to be:

o Gas-Gas: 5.2833 Btu/ft2-hr-°F

o Gas-Water: 39.625 Btu/ft2-hr-°F

Page 40: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

40

o Water-Water: 396.25 Btu/ft2-hr-°F

Reboilers and Condensers can sized and priced as heat exchangers

Page 41: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

41

References

(n.d.). Retrieved 1 20, 2011, from Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis:

http://www.engr.iupui.edu/me/courses/shellandtube

Material Safety Data Sheet: Hydrogen. (1996, 6 7). Retrieved 2 11, 2011, from BOC Gases:

http://www.fergusongases.com/MSDS_files/HYDROGEN.pdf

Material and Safety Data Sheet: Carbon Dioxide. (2005, 4 11). Retrieved 2 11, 2011, from

Airgas: http://www.airgas.com/documents/pdf/1013.pdf

Wiley Critical Content - Petroleum Technology, Vol 1-2. (2007). John Wiley & Sons.

Cheresources. (2008). Retrieved 1 30, 2011, from

http://www.cheresources.com/questions/equipment_design-98.html

Material Safety Data Sheet: Carbon Monoxide. (2010, 9 2). Retrieved 2 11, 2011, from Airgas:

http://www.airgas.com/documents/pdf/001014.pdf

Material Safety Data Sheet: Ethane. (2010, 4 26). Retrieved 2 11, 2011, from Airgas:

http://www.airgas.com/documents/pdf/001024.pdf

Material Safety Data Sheet: Propane. (2010, 11 10). Retrieved 2 11, 2011, from Airgas:

http://www.airgas.com/documents/pdf/001045.pdf

Material Safety Data Sheet: Oxygen. (2011, 2 2). Retrieved 2 11, 2011, from Airgas:

http://www.airgas.com/documents/pdf/001043.pdf

Agency, U. S. (2003). Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other

Environmental Impacts (TRACI). Washington D.C.: United States Environmental

Protection Agency.

Aspen Technology. (Vers. 2006). Aspen Plus.

Choi, G. N., Kramer, S. J., & Tam, S. S. (1996). Design/Economics of a Once-Trhough Natural

Gas Fischer-Tropsch Plant Weith Power Co-Production. Department of Energy.

Elbashir, N. O., & Roberts, C. B. (2004). Selective Control of Hydrocarbon Product Distribtuion

in Supercritical Phase Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis. Alabama: Auburn Univeristy

Department of Chemical Engineering.

Elliot, J. R., & Lira, C. T. (2009). Introductory Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics (Second

Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR, 2009.

Felder, R. M., & Rousseau, R. W. (2005). Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes (Third

Edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Page 42: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

42

Fogler, S. H. (2008). Elements of Chemical Reaction Engineering (Fourth Edition). Westford

Massachusetts: Prentice Hall.

Gian Paolo, C., & Peter, M. M. (2006). Metal-Catalyst in Industrial Organic Processes. Royal

Society of Chmistry.

Haynes, W. M., & Lide, D. R. (2011). CNC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics (91st Edition).

Yalor and Francis Group.

Higman, C., & Maarten, v. d. (2008). Gasification (2nd Edition. Elsevier.

Letcher, T. M. (2008). Future Energy - Improved, Sustainable and Clean Options for Our

Planet. Elsevier.

Material Safety Data Sheet: Methane. (n.d.). Retrieved 2 11, 2010, from iSOC Technology:

http://www.isocinfo.com/DocumentRoot/13/Methane.pdf

McCabe, W. L., Smith, J. C., & Harriott, P. (2005). Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering

(Seventh Edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2010, Febuary 1). NIST Chemistry WebBook.

Retrieved November 2010, from NIST Standard Reference Databse:

http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry

Perry, R. H., Green, D. W., & Maloney, J. O. (1997). Perry's Chemical Engineers Handbook

(Seventh Edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Peters, M. S., Timmerhaus, K. D., & West, E. R. (2003). Plant Design and Economics for

Chemical Engineers (Fifth Edition). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Rackley, S. A. (2010). Carbon Capture and Storage. Elsevier.

Seader, J. D., & Henley, E. J. (2006). Separation Process Principles (Second Edition). Noboken,

NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Singleton, A. H. (n.d.). Technology Development for Cobalt Fischer-Tropsch Catalyst. Pittsburn

PA: Energy international Corporation.

Storsaeter, S., Aaserud, C., Milmen, A.-.. M., Lindvag, O. A., Bergenes, E., Schankes, D., et al.

(2002). Effect of Water on the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis on Supported Cobalt Catalyst.

Trondheim Norway: Norwegian University of Science and Technology Department of

Chemical Engineering.

Wang, X., & Michael, E. (2009). Advanced Natural Gas Engineering. Gulf Publishing

Company.

Page 43: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

43

Yates, I., & Satterfield, C. (1991). Intrinsic Kinetics of the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis on a

Cobalt Catalyst. Energy and Fuels Vol. 5, 168-173.

Page 44: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

44

Synthesis Gas Unit

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor

Flash 1

Syngas Preheater

Vacuum Distillation 1

Vacuum Distillation 2

Absorber Stripper 1Stripper 2

Oxygen Preheater

HP Steam

MP Steam

Flash 6

Flash 7

Wax

Diesel

Compressor 1

Flash 2

Flash 3

Flash 4

Flash 5

Flash 8

Naphtha

Compressor 2

Refridgration

Fuel Gas

Blower

Waste Water

Fuel Air

DecanterMP Steam

Air

Hydro-Isomerization Unit

LPG

Naphtha

Diesel

LP Steam

Pump

MP Steam

Syngas Unit

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Unit

Diesel and Wax Separation Unit

Naphtha Separation Unit

Appendix

Appendix A.1 – Process Flow Diagrams

Figure 1. Plant Process Flow Diagram

Page 45: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

45

Appendix A.1.1 – Synthesis Gas Unit

High Pressure Steam Boiler

Medium Pressure Steam Boiler

Oxygen Preheater

Feed Preheater

Methane

Carbon Dioxide

Steam

Oxygen

Steam Condensate

Steam Condensate

Syngas Feed54,899.03 lbmol/hr Methane

27,449.52 lbmol/hr Water

17,784.69 lbmol/hr Carbon

Dioxide

Syngas Effluent277.52 lbmol/hr Methane

12,769.58 lbmol/hr Water

0 lbmol/hr Oxygen

10,44.72 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

61,961.48 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

123,922.95 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.65 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

Oxygen Feed16,3000.80 lbmol/hr Oxygen

164.65 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

Synthesis Gas Unit

Operating ConditionsTemperature: 1950

oF

Pressure: 300 psig

Steam to Methane Ratio: 0.5

Feed to Fischer-Tropsch Reactor277.52 lbmol/hr Methane

12,769.58 lbmol/hr Water

0 lbmol/hr Oxygen

10,44.72 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

61,961.48 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

123,922.95 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.65 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

Temperature: 425oF

Pressure: 300 psig

High Pressure Steam to

Other Processes1,878.99 klbm/hr

Temperature: 490oF

Pressure: 600 psig

Medium Pressure Steam

to Other Processes133.49 klbm/hr

Temperature: 353oF

Pressure: 125 psig

Figure 2. Synthesis Gas Unit PFD

Page 46: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

46

Figure 3. ASPEN Diagram for the Syngas Unit Heat Exchangers

Page 47: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

47

Table 2. Syngas Effluent and Feed Streams 1-DIOXIDE

1 2 3 4 5 DIOXIDE

Methane 277.52 277.52 277.52 - 54,899.03 -

Water 12,769.58 12,769.58 12,769.58 - 27,449.51 -

Oxygen - - - 16,300.80 - -

Carbon Dioxide 10,444.72 10,444.72 10,444.72 - 17,784.69 17,784.69

Carbon Monoxide 61,961.48 61,961.48 61,961.48 - - -

Hydrogen 123,923.00 123,923.00 123,923.00 - - -

Nitrogen 164.65 164.65 164.65 164.65 - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane 0.0013 0.0013 0.0013 - 0.5483 -

Water 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 - 0.2741 -

Oxygen - - - 0.9900 - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0498 0.0498 0.0498 - 0.1776 1.0000

Carbon Monoxide 0.2957 0.2957 0.2957 - - -

Hydrogen 0.5914 0.5914 0.5914 - - -

Nitrogen 0.0008 0.0008 0.0008 0.0100 - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

209,541.00 209,541.00 209,541.00 16,465.45 100,133.00 17,784.69

2,684,160.00 2,684,160.00 2,684,160.00 526,219.00 2,157,940.00 782,701.00

16,745,100.00 12,988,700.00 6,860,740.00 501,111.00 1,527,870.00 207,532.00

1,883.77 1,358.07 500.47 1,000.00 336.32 100.00

314.70 314.70 314.70 514.70 514.70 514.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 1.00

Liquid Fraction - - - - 0.08 -

-15,036 -19,284 -25,805 6,961 -75,036 -168,970

-1,174 -1,505 -2,014 218 -3,482 -3,839

-3.1506.E+09 -4.0408.E+09 -5.4071.E+09 1.1462.E+08 -7.5136.E+09 -3.0051.E+09

12.66 10.61 5.77 0.50 -16.45 -6.00

0.99 0.83 0.45 0.02 -0.76 -0.14

0.01 0.02 0.03 0.03 0.07 0.09

0.16 0.21 0.39 1.05 1.41 3.77

12.81 12.81 12.81 31.96 21.55 44.01

172,505.00 172,505.00 172,505.00 14,125.94 70,292.92 15,257.73

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Density (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Temperature (°F)

Pressure (psia)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Stream Number

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Mole Fraction

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Page 48: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

48

Table 3. Syngas Effluent and Feed Streams FTR-MP2OUT

FTR HP1IN HP1OUT METHANE MP2IN MP2OUT

Methane 277.52 - - 54,899.03 - -

Water 12,769.58 104,300.00 104,300.00 - 7,410.00 7,410.00

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 10,444.72 - - - - -

Carbon Monoxide 61,961.48 - - - - -

Hydrogen 123,923.00 - - - - -

Nitrogen 164.65 - - - - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane 0.0013 - - 1.0000 - -

Water 0.0609 1.0000 1.0000 - 1.0000 1.0000

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0498 - - - - -

Carbon Monoxide 0.2957 - - - - -

Hydrogen 0.5914 - - - - -

Nitrogen 0.0008 - - - - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

209,541.00 104,300.00 104,300.00 54,899.03 7,410.00 7,410.00

2,684,160.00 1,878,990.00 1,878,990.00 880,732.00 133,493.00 133,493.00

6,321,430.00 41,344.02 1,729,230.00 640,623.00 2,577.40 461,149.00

425.00 488.96 490.00 100.00 353.04 353.03

314.70 614.70 614.70 514.70 139.70 139.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 - 1.00

Liquid Fraction - 1.00 - - 1.00 0.00

-26,357 -113,670 -100,570 -31,840 -117,390 -101,760

-2,058 -6,309 -5,582 -1,985 -6,516 -5,649

-5.5229.E+09 -1.1860.E+10 -1.0490.E+10 -1.7480.E+09 -8.6986.E+08 -7.5408.E+08

5.17 -27.14 -13.33 -25.95 -30.98 -11.75

0.40 -1.51 -0.74 -1.62 -1.72 -0.65

0.03 2.52 0.06 0.09 2.87 0.02

0.42 45.45 1.09 1.37 51.79 0.29

12.81 18.02 18.02 16.04 18.02 18.02

172,505.00 30,156.60 30,156.60 47,098.63 2,142.48 2,142.48

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Density (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Temperature (°F)

Pressure (psia)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Stream Number

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Mole Fraction

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Page 49: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

49

Table 4. Syngas Effluent and Feed Streams O2TOSYN-TOSYN

O2TOSYN OXYGEN STEAM SYNFEED SYNGAS TOSYN

Methane - - - 54,899.03 277.52 54,899.03

Water - - 27,449.51 27,449.51 12,769.58 27,449.51

Oxygen 16,300.80 16,300.80 - - - -

Carbon Dioxide - - - 17,784.69 10,444.72 17,784.69

Carbon Monoxide - - - - 61,961.48 -

Hydrogen - - - - 123,923.00 -

Nitrogen 164.65 164.65 - - 164.65 -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane - - - 0.5483 0.0013 0.5483

Water - - 1.0000 0.2741 0.0609 0.2741

Oxygen 0.9900 0.9900 - - - -

Carbon Dioxide - - - 0.1776 0.0498 0.1776

Carbon Monoxide - - - - 0.2957 -

Hydrogen - - - - 0.5914 -

Nitrogen 0.0100 0.0100 - - 0.0008 -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

16,465.45 16,465.45 27,449.51 100,133.00 209,541.00 100,133.00

526,219.00 526,219.00 494,511.00 2,157,940.00 2,684,160.00 2,157,940.00

819,585.00 183,555.00 455,097.00 2,456,650.00 17,218,400.00 4,984,230.00

1,000.00 75.00 490.00 306.08 1,950.00 1,000.00

314.70 514.70 614.70 314.70 314.70 314.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.94 1.00 1.00

Liquid Fraction - - - 0.06 - -

6,961 -14 -100,570 -75,036 -14,488 -66,146

218 0 -5,582 -3,482 -1,131 -3,069

1.1462.E+08 -2.3079.E+05 -2.7605.E+09 -7.5136.E+09 -3.0358.E+09 -6.6234.E+09

1.48 -6.98 -13.33 -15.54 12.89 -7.04

0.05 -0.22 -0.74 -0.72 1.01 -0.33

0.02 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.01 0.02

0.64 2.87 1.09 0.88 0.16 0.43

31.96 31.96 18.02 21.55 12.81 21.55

14,125.94 14,125.94 7,936.57 70,292.92 172,505.00 70,292.92

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Density (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Temperature (°F)

Pressure (psia)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Stream Number

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Mole Fraction

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Page 50: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

50

Appendix A.1.2 – Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Unit

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Effluent4918.7 lbmol/hr Methane

69138.23 lbmol/hr Water

0 lbmol/hr Oxygen

10444.72 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5592.83 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11185.65 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.65 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

98.37 lbmol/hr Ethane

65.58 lbmol/hr Propane

49.19 lbmol/hr Butane

3184.93 lbmol/hr Naphtha

1245.26 lbmol/hr Diesel

208.58 lbmol/hr C21-C25

91.22 lbmol/hr C26-C29

73.83 lbmol/hr C30-C35

53.43 lbmol/hr C36-C47

12.79 lbmol/hr C48+

Temperature: 408.5oF

Pressure: 265.41 psia

Pump

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor

Operating ConditionsTemperature: 425

oF

Pressure: 300 psig

Shell Side Cooling Water11,570.3 klbm/hr

Temperature: 405.1oF

Pressure: 246.71 psig

Steam to Other Processes11,570.3 klbm/hr

Temperature: 405.1oF

Pressure: 246.71 psig

277.52 lbmol/hr Methane

12,769.58 lbmol/hr Water

0 lbmol/hr Oxygen

10,44.72 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

61,961.48 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

123,922.95 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.65 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

Figure 4. Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Unit PFD

Page 51: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

51

Flash 1

Heat Exchanger 1

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Effluent4918.7 lbmol/hr Methane

69138.23 lbmol/hr Water

10444.72 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5592.83 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11185.65 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.65 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

98.37 lbmol/hr Ethane

65.58 lbmol/hr Propane

49.19 lbmol/hr Butane

3184.93 lbmol/hr Naphtha

1245.26 lbmol/hr Diesel

208.58 lbmol/hr C21-C25

91.22 lbmol/hr C26-C29

73.83 lbmol/hr C30-C35

53.43 lbmol/hr C36-C47

12.79 lbmol/hr C48+

Temperature: 408.5oF

Pressure: 265.41 psia

Compressor 1

Heat Exchanger 16

To Flash 2

Flash 6

Heat Exchanger 10

Flash 7

Hydro-Isomerization Unit

LPG

Naphtha

Diesel

Flash 8

Vacuum Distillation 1

Vacuum Distillation 2

Vacuum Distillation 1 Feed1.71 lbmol/hr Methane

313.46 lbmol/hr Water

6.42 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

1.15 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.39 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.03 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.11lbmol/hr Ethane

0.2 lbmol/hr Propane

0.35 lbmol/hr Butane

327.97 lbmol/hr Naptha

1,239.78 lbmol/hr Diesel

208.48 lbmol/hr C21-C25

91.22 lbmol/hr C26-C29

73.83 lbmol/hr C30-C35

53.43 lbmol/hr C36-C47

12.79 lbmol/hr C48+

Liquid from Flash 60 lbmol/hr Methane

0.46 lbmol/hr Water

0.02 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0 lbmol/hr Ethane

0 lbmol/hr Propane

0.1 lbmol/hr Butane

136.03 lbmol/hr Naptha

332.21 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.13 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Vapor from Flash 63.45 lbmol/hr Methane

69.15 lbmol/hr Water

17.39 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

2.11 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.54 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.06 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.28 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.44 lbmol/hr Propane

0.59 lbmol/hr Butane

586.7 lbmol/hr Naptha

13.11 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Liquid from Flash 70 lbmol/hr Methane

0.09 lbmol/hr Water

0.01 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0 lbmol/hr Ethane

0 lbmol/hr Propane

0 lbmol/hr Butane

44.26 lbmol/hr Naptha

12.58 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Vapor from Flash 73.45 lbmol/hr Methane

69.05 lbmol/hr Water

17.38 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

2.11 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.54 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.06 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.28 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.44 lbmol/hr Propane

0.58 lbmol/hr Butane

542.45 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.53 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Liquid from Flash 11.03 lbmol/hr Methane

123.16 lbmol/hr Water

3.7 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.71 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.24 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.02 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.07 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.11 lbmol/hr Propane

0.19 lbmol/hr Butane

112.15 lbmol/hr Naptha

688.39 lbmol/hr Diesel

202.69 lbmol/hr C21-C25

90.82 lbmol/hr C26-C29

73.76 lbmol/hr C30-C35

53.43 lbmol/hr C36-C47

12.79 lbmol/hr C48+

Vapor from Flash 14,917.67 lbmol/hr Methane

69,015.07 lbmol/hr Water

10,441.02 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,592.12 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11,185.41 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.63 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

98.3 lbmol/hr Ethane

65.47 lbmol/hr Propane

49.0 lbmol/hr Butane

3,072.78 lbmol/hr Naptha

556.87 lbmol/hr Diesel

5.89 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0.4 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0.07 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Liquid from Flash 40.01 lbmol/hr Methane

0.23 lbmol/hr Water

0.06 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.01 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0 lbmol/hr Ethane

0 lbmol/hr Propane

0.1 lbmol/hr Butane

2.57 lbmol/hr Naptha

1.06 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Liquid from Flash 20.66 lbmol/hr Methane

189.5 lbmol/hr Water

2.63 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.44 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.14 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.01 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.05 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.08 lbmol/hr Propane

0.14 lbmol/hr Butane

32.97 lbmol/hr Naptha

205.55 lbmol/hr Diesel

5.67 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0.4 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0.07 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Liquid from Flash 33.45 lbmol/hr Methane

69.6 lbmol/hr Water

17.41 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

2.11 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.54 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.06 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.28 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.45 lbmol/hr Propane

0.6 lbmol/hr Butane

722.74 lbmol/hr Naptha

345.32 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.13 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Waxes to HI0 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.17 lbmol/hr Diesel

208.48 lbmol/hr C21-C25

91.22 lbmol/hr C26-C29

73.83 lbmol/hr C30-C35

53.43 lbmol/hr C36-C47

12.79 lbmol/hr C48+

Diesel0 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.17 lbmol/hr Diesel

208.48 lbmol/hr C21-C25

91.22 lbmol/hr C26-C29

73.83 lbmol/hr C30-C35

53.43 lbmol/hr C36-C47

12.79 lbmol/hr C48+

Naphtha0.44 lbmol/hr Methane

9.38 lbmol/hr Water

18.01 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.1 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.39 lbmol/hr Ethane

2.38 lbmol/hr Propane

6.62 lbmol/hr Butane

3,146.7 lbmol/hr Naptha

6.16 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Vacuum Distillation 1 Distillate1.71 lbmol/hr Methane

313.46 lbmol/hr Water

6.42 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

1.15 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.39 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.03 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.11lbmol/hr Ethane

0.2 lbmol/hr Propane

0.35 lbmol/hr Butane

327.97 lbmol/hr Naptha

1,239.78 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.01 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Vacuum Distillation 2 Distillate1.71 lbmol/hr Methane

313.46 lbmol/hr Water

6.42 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

1.15 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.39 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.03 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.11lbmol/hr Ethane

0.2 lbmol/hr Propane

0.35 lbmol/hr Butane

327.97 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.74 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

From Decanter27.37 lbmol/hr Methane

20.47 lbmol/hr Water

292.12 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

12.99 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

1.76 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.36 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

3.99 lbmol/hr Ethane

8.11 lbmol/hr Propane

11.33 lbmol/hr Butane

2,342.61 lbmol/hr Naptha

4.89 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+To Waste Water0.04 lbmol/hr Methane

330.37 lbmol/hr Water

1.81 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.01 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.04 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.24 lbmol/hr Propane

0.66 lbmol/hr Butane

0 lbmol/hr Naptha

To Absorber32.04 lbmol/hr Methane

63.24 lbmol/hr Water

296.1 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

16.14 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

2.68 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.45 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

3.95 lbmol/hr Ethane

6.13 lbmol/hr Propane

4.97 lbmol/hr Butane

66.32 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

Cooling Water 1 from

Heat Exchanger 3Temperature: 119.3

oF

2,042.96 kgal/hr

Exiting Cooling Water 1Temperature: 120

oF

2,042.96 kgal/hr

Heat Exchanger 14

Cooling Water 3Temperature: 85

oF

68.49 kgal/hr

Exiting Cooling Water 3Temperature: 120

oF

68.49 kgal/hr

Appendix A.1.3 – Diesel and Wax Separation Unit

Figure 5. Diesel and Wax Separation Unit PFD

Page 52: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

52

Absorber

Stripper 1

Stripper 2

Heat Exchanger 9

Flash 2

Flash 3

Heat Exchanger 8

Flash 4Heat Exchanger 6

Flash 5

Compressor 2

Blower

Decanter

Steam Condensate

Steam Condensate

From Flsh 832.04 lbmol/hr Methane

63.24 lbmol/hr Water

296.1 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

16.14 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

2.68 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.45 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

3.95 lbmol/hr Ethane

6.13 lbmol/hr Propane

4.97 lbmol/hr Butane

66.32 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

To Flash 827.37 lbmol/hr Methane

20.47 lbmol/hr Water

292.12 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

12.99 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

1.76 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.36 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

3.99 lbmol/hr Ethane

8.11 lbmol/hr Propane

11.33 lbmol/hr Butane

2,342.61 lbmol/hr Naptha

4.89 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

To Vacuum Distillation 10.66 lbmol/hr Methane

189.5 lbmol/hr Water

2.63 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.44 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.14 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.01 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.05 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.08 lbmol/hr Propane

0.14 lbmol/hr Butane

32.97 lbmol/hr Naptha

205.55 lbmol/hr Diesel

5.67 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0.4 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0.07 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

To Flash 63.45 lbmol/hr Methane

69.6 lbmol/hr Water

17.41 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

2.11 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.54 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.06 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.28 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.45 lbmol/hr Propane

0.6 lbmol/hr Butane

722.74 lbmol/hr Naptha

345.32 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.13 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Heat Exchanger 7

Vapor from Flash 14,917.67 lbmol/hr Methane

69,015.07 lbmol/hr Water

10,441.02 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,592.12 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11,185.41 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.63 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

98.3 lbmol/hr Ethane

65.47 lbmol/hr Propane

49.0 lbmol/hr Butane

3,072.78 lbmol/hr Naptha

556.87 lbmol/hr Diesel

5.89 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0.4 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0.07 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Vapor From Flash 24,917.0 lbmol/hr Methane

68,825.57 lbmol/hr Water

10,438.39 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,591.68 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11,185.27 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.62 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

98.26 lbmol/hr Ethane

65.39 lbmol/hr Propane

48.86 lbmol/hr Butane

3,039.82 lbmol/hr Naptha

351.33 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.23 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0.0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0.0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Medium Pressure Steam

to Other Processes35.13 klbm/hr

Temperature: 353oF

Pressure: 125 psig

Low Pressure Steam

to Other Processes900.76 klbm/hr

Temperature: 260oF

Pressure: 20 psig

Exiting Cooling Water 22,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 120oF

Cooling Water 2 from

Heat Exchanger 62,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 98.37oF

P-44

To Vacuum Distillation 10.01 lbmol/hr Methane

0.23 lbmol/hr Water

0.06 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.01 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0 lbmol/hr Ethane

0 lbmol/hr Propane

0.1 lbmol/hr Butane

2.57 lbmol/hr Naptha

1.06 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Water Phase0.98 lbmol/hr Methane

88.07 lbmol/hr Water

10.48 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.47 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.06 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.01 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.14 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.29 lbmol/hr Propane

0.41 lbmol/hr Butane

0.2 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

Flash 3 Water Phase148.22 lbmol/hr Methane

63,080.66 lbmol/hr Water

748.25 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

90.51 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

23.07 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

2.57 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

11.89 lbmol/hr Ethane

19.19 lbmol/hr Propane

25.66 lbmol/hr Butane

0.53 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.05 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.1 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Flash 3 Vapor3.45 lbmol/hr Methane

69.6 lbmol/hr Water

17.41 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

2.11 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.54 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.06 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.28 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.45 lbmol/hr Propane

0.6 lbmol/hr Butane

722.74 lbmol/hr Naptha

345.32 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.13 lbmol/hr C21-C25

0 lbmol/hr C26-C29

0 lbmol/hr C30-C35

0 lbmol/hr C36-C47

0 lbmol/hr C48+

Cooling Water 2 to

Heat Exchanger 72,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 98.37oF

Cooling Water 2 from

Heat Exchanger 52,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 98.23oF

Flash 4 Water Phase0.8 lbmol/hr Methane

334.44 lbmol/hr Water

4.09 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0.49 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0.12 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.01 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0.06 lbmol/hr Ethane

0.11 lbmol/hr Propane

0.14 lbmol/hr Butane

0 lbmol/hr Naptha

Flash 4 Vapor Phase4,764.52 lbmol/hr Methane

5,340.65 lbmol/hr Water

9,668.58 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,498.58 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11,161.53 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

161.97 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

86.03 lbmol/hr Ethane

45.64 lbmol/hr Propane

22.46 lbmol/hr Butane

2,313.98 lbmol/hr Naptha

4.9 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25Heat Exchanger 5

Cooling Water 2 to

Heat Exchanger 62,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 98.23oF

Cooling Water 2 from

Heat Exchanger 42,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 85.4oF

Flash 5 Water Phase39.09 lbmol/hr Methane

5,241.96 lbmol/hr Water

389.02 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

18.89 lbmol/hr Carbon

Monoxide

2.66 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.52 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

5.26 lbmol/hr Ethane

9.15 lbmol/hr Propane

9.36 lbmol/hr Butane

2.48 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.01 lbmol/hr Diesel

0 lbmol/hr C21-C25

Flash 5 Vapor4,708.08 lbmol/hr Methane

87.32 lbmol/hr Water

9,106.89 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,471.30 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11,157.69 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

161.22 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

78.44 lbmol/hr Ethane

32.43 lbmol/hr Propane

8.95 lbmol/hr Butane

102.51 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

Flash 5 Liquid17.35 lbmol/hr Methane

11.36 lbmol/hr Water

172.68 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

8.39 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

1.18 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.23 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

2.33 lbmol/hr Ethane

4.06 lbmol/hr Propane

4.16 lbmol/hr Butane

2,209.0 lbmol/hr Naptha

4.89 lbmol/hr Diesel

Refridgeration

Exiting RefrigerantTemperature: 95

oF

Incoming RefrigerantTemperature: 5

oF

Absorber Gas Feed4,740.12 lbmol/hr Methane

150.56 lbmol/hr Water

9,402.98 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,487.44 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

11,160.37 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

161.67 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

82.39 lbmol/hr Ethane

38.56 lbmol/hr Propane

13.91 lbmol/hr Butane

168.83 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

Stripper 1 Feed Gas4,729.12 lbmol/hr Methane

108.54 lbmol/hr Water

9,273.06 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

5,482.37 lbmol/hr Carbon

Monoxide

11,159.73 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

161.53 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

80.59 lbmol/hr Ethane

34.22 lbmol/hr Propane

6.34 lbmol/hr Butane

35.02 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

Absorber Liquid Effluent28.35 lbmol/hr Methane

108.54 lbmol/hr Water

302.6 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

13.45 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

1.82 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.37 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

4.13 lbmol/hr Ethane

8.4 lbmol/hr Propane

11.73 lbmol/hr Butane

2,342.81 lbmol/hr Naptha

4.89 lbmol/hr Diesel

Heat Exchanger 2

Heat Exchanger 3

P-54

Cooling Water 1 to

Heat Exchanger 10752.21 kgal/hr

Temperature: 119.3oF

Cooling Water 1 752.21 kgal/hr

Temperature: 85oF

Heat Exchanger 4

Cooling Water 2 2,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 85oF

Cooling Water 2 to

Heat Exchanger 52,042.96 kgal/hr

Temperature: 85.4oF

P-60

Fuel Gas4,888.33 lbmol/hr Methane

1,505.6 lbmol/hr Water

10,074.08 lbmol/hr Carbon

Dioxide

5,579.05 lbmol/hr Carbon

Monoxide

11,183.96 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

164.27 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

93.32 lbmol/hr Ethane

54.46 lbmol/hr Propane

35.8 lbmol/hr Butane

38.22 lbmol/hr Naptha

0.07 lbmol/hr Diesel

Fuel Air29.93 lbmol/hr Methane

1,108.78 lbmol/hr Water

10,480.22 lbmol/hr Oxygen

352.62 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

13.68 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

1.69 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

39,441.98 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

4.67 lbmol/hr Ethane

8.74 lbmol/hr Propane

6.74 lbmol/hr Butane

0.01 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

Stripper 2 Feed Liquid29.93 lbmol/hr Methane

67,623.29 lbmol/hr Water

352.62 lbmol/hr Carbon

Dioxide

13.68 lbmol/hr Carbon

Monoxide

1.69 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

0.37 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

4.67 lbmol/hr Ethane

8.74 lbmol/hr Propane

6.77 lbmol/hr Butane

0.01 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.1 lbmol/hr C21-C25

Waste Water0 lbmol/hr Methane

6,514.5 lbmol/hr Water

19.78 lbmol/hr Oxygen

0 lbmol/hr Carbon Dioxide

0 lbmol/hr Carbon Monoxide

0 lbmol/hr Hydrogen

48.39 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

0 lbmol/hr Ethane

0 lbmol/hr Propane

0.04 lbmol/hr Butane

0 lbmol/hr Naptha

0 lbmol/hr Diesel

0.1 lbmol/hr C21-C25

Air10,480.22 lbmol/hr Oxygen

39,441.98 lbmol/hr Nitrogen

Appendix A.1.4 – Naphtha Separation Unit

Figure 6. Naphtha Separation Unit PFD

Page 53: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

53

Figure 7. ASPEN Diagram for Diesel and Wax Separation Unit

Page 54: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

54

Figure 8. ASPEN Diagram for Naphtha Separation Unit

Page 55: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

55

Table 5. Stream Table for Separation Streams 1-6

1 2 3 4 5 6

Methane 4,917.67 1.03 4,917.67 4,917.67 4,917.00 0.66

Water 69,015.07 123.16 69,015.07 69,015.07 68,825.57 189.50

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 10,441.02 3.70 10,441.02 10,441.02 10,438.39 2.63

Carbon Monoxide 5,592.12 0.71 5,592.12 5,592.12 5,591.68 0.44

Hydrogen 11,185.41 0.24 11,185.41 11,185.41 11,185.27 0.14

Nitrogen 164.63 0.02 164.63 164.63 164.62 0.01

Ethane 98.30 0.07 98.30 98.30 98.26 0.05

Propane 65.47 0.11 65.47 65.47 65.39 0.08

Butane 49.00 0.19 49.00 49.00 48.86 0.14

Naptha 3,072.78 112.15 3,072.78 3,072.78 3,039.82 32.97

Diesel 556.87 688.39 556.87 556.87 351.33 205.55

C21-C25 5.89 202.69 5.89 5.89 0.23 5.67

C26-C29 0.40 90.82 0.40 0.40 0.00 0.40

C30-C35 0.07 73.76 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.07

C36-C47 0.00 53.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

C48+ 0.00 12.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

Methane 0.0468 0.0008 0.0468 0.0468 0.0470 0.0015

Water 0.6563 0.0903 0.6563 0.6563 0.6572 0.4324

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0993 0.0027 0.0993 0.0993 0.0997 0.0060

Carbon Monoxide 0.0532 0.0005 0.0532 0.0532 0.0534 0.0010

Hydrogen 0.1064 0.0002 0.1064 0.1064 0.1068 0.0003

Nitrogen 0.0016 0.0000 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0000

Ethane 0.0009 0.0000 0.0009 0.0009 0.0009 0.0001

Propane 0.0006 0.0001 0.0006 0.0006 0.0006 0.0002

Butane 0.0005 0.0001 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0003

Naptha 0.0292 0.0823 0.0292 0.0292 0.0290 0.0752

Diesel 0.0053 0.5050 0.0053 0.0053 0.0034 0.4690

C21-C25 0.0001 0.1487 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0129

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0666 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0009

C30-C35 0.0000 0.0541 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0002

C36-C47 0.0000 0.0392 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C48+ 0.0000 0.0094 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

105,165.00 1,363.26 105,165.00 105,165.00 104,726.00 438.30

2,427,950.00 341,148.00 2,427,950.00 2,427,950.00 2,373,730.00 54,217.66

3,691,580.00 8,495.44 3,641,110.00 3,493,420.00 3,492,020.00 1,395.42

408.49 408.49 396.69 365.00 365.00 365.00

265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 -

Liquid Fraction - 1.00 0.00 0.00 - 1.00

-89,392 -184,570 -89,518 -89,919 -89,734 -134,250

-3,872 -738 -3,877 -3,895 -3,959 -1,085

-9.4009.E+09 -2.5162.E+08 -9.4142.E+09 -9.4563.E+09 -9.3975.E+09 -5.8841.E+07

-12.20 -368.91 -12.35 -12.83 -12.11 -183.68

-0.53 -1.47 -0.53 -0.56 -0.53 -1.48

0.03 0.16 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.31

0.66 40.16 0.67 0.70 0.68 38.85

23.09 250.24 23.09 23.09 22.67 123.70

58,269.07 6,951.80 58,269.07 58,269.07 57,143.72 1,125.35

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 56: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

56

Table 6. Stream Table for Separation Streams 7-12

7 8 9 10 11 12

Methane 4,917.00 4,765.34 3.45 148.22 4,765.34 4,764.52

Water 68,825.57 5,675.31 69.60 63,080.66 5,675.31 5,340.65

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 10,438.39 9,672.73 17.41 748.25 9,672.73 9,668.58

Carbon Monoxide 5,591.68 5,499.07 2.11 90.51 5,499.07 5,498.58

Hydrogen 11,185.27 11,161.66 0.54 23.07 11,161.66 11,161.53

Nitrogen 164.62 161.98 0.06 2.57 161.98 161.97

Ethane 98.26 86.09 0.28 11.89 86.09 86.03

Propane 65.39 45.75 0.45 19.19 45.75 45.64

Butane 48.86 22.61 0.60 25.66 22.61 22.46

Naptha 3,039.82 2,316.55 722.74 0.53 2,316.55 2,313.98

Diesel 351.33 5.96 345.32 0.05 5.96 4.90

C21-C25 0.23 0.00 0.13 0.10 0.00 0.00

C26-C29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

C30-C35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -

C36-C47 0.00 - 0.00 0.00 - -

C48+ 0.00 - - - - -

Methane 0.0470 0.1209 0.0030 0.0023 0.1209 0.1220

Water 0.6572 0.1440 0.0599 0.9833 0.1440 0.1367

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0997 0.2454 0.0150 0.0117 0.2454 0.2475

Carbon Monoxide 0.0534 0.1395 0.0018 0.0014 0.1395 0.1407

Hydrogen 0.1068 0.2832 0.0005 0.0004 0.2832 0.2857

Nitrogen 0.0016 0.0041 0.0001 0.0000 0.0041 0.0041

Ethane 0.0009 0.0022 0.0002 0.0002 0.0022 0.0022

Propane 0.0006 0.0012 0.0004 0.0003 0.0012 0.0012

Butane 0.0005 0.0006 0.0005 0.0004 0.0006 0.0006

Naptha 0.0290 0.0588 0.6216 0.0000 0.0588 0.0592

Diesel 0.0034 0.0002 0.2970 0.0000 0.0002 0.0001

C21-C25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C30-C35 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 -

C36-C47 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000 - -

C48+ 0.0000 - - - - -

104,726.00 39,413.05 1,162.67 64,150.69 39,413.05 39,068.85

2,373,730.00 1,041,050.00 155,503.00 1,177,170.00 1,041,050.00 1,034,290.00

1,186,210.00 1,155,810.00 4,035.61 21,386.59 1,130,230.00 1,140,840.00

260.00 265.61 265.61 265.61 250.00 262.53

265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41

Phase

Vapor Fraction 0.38 1.00 - - 1.00 1.00

Liquid Fraction 0.62 - 1.00 1.00 0.00 -

-101,090 -70,611 -119,900 -119,480 -70,789 -70,360

-4,460 -2,673 -896 -6,511 -2,680 -2,658

-1.0590.E+10 -2.7830.E+09 -1.3940.E+08 -7.6645.E+09 -2.7900.E+09 -2.7489.E+09

-26.32 -10.17 -211.30 -32.86 -10.42 -10.20

-1.16 -0.39 -1.58 -1.79 -0.39 -0.39

0.09 0.03 0.29 3.00 0.03 0.03

2.00 0.90 38.53 55.04 0.92 0.91

22.67 26.41 133.75 18.35 26.41 26.47

57,143.72 34,509.96 3,440.21 19,193.55 34,509.96 34,396.64

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 57: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

57

Table 7. Stream Table for Separation Streams 13-18

13 14 15 16 17 18

Methane 0.01 0.80 4,764.52 4,708.08 17.35 39.09

Water 0.23 334.44 5,340.65 87.32 11.36 5,241.96

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.06 4.09 9,668.58 9,106.89 172.68 389.02

Carbon Monoxide 0.01 0.49 5,498.58 5,471.30 8.39 18.89

Hydrogen 0.00 0.12 11,161.53 11,157.69 1.18 2.66

Nitrogen 0.00 0.01 161.97 161.22 0.23 0.52

Ethane 0.00 0.06 86.03 78.44 2.33 5.26

Propane 0.00 0.11 45.64 32.43 4.06 9.15

Butane 0.00 0.14 22.46 8.95 4.16 9.36

Naptha 2.57 0.00 2,313.98 102.51 2,209.00 2.48

Diesel 1.06 0.00 4.90 0.00 4.89 0.01

C21-C25 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00 0.00

C26-C29 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane 0.0030 0.0024 0.1220 0.1523 0.0071 0.0068

Water 0.0574 0.9829 0.1367 0.0028 0.0047 0.9167

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0153 0.0120 0.2475 0.2946 0.0709 0.0680

Carbon Monoxide 0.0018 0.0014 0.1407 0.1770 0.0034 0.0033

Hydrogen 0.0005 0.0004 0.2857 0.3609 0.0005 0.0005

Nitrogen 0.0001 0.0000 0.0041 0.0052 0.0001 0.0001

Ethane 0.0002 0.0002 0.0022 0.0025 0.0010 0.0009

Propane 0.0004 0.0003 0.0012 0.0010 0.0017 0.0016

Butane 0.0005 0.0004 0.0006 0.0003 0.0017 0.0016

Naptha 0.6526 0.0000 0.0592 0.0033 0.9070 0.0004

Diesel 0.2682 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0020 0.0000

C21-C25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000 0.0000

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

3.93 340.27 39,068.85 30,914.81 2,435.64 5,718.40

514.13 6,247.24 1,034,290.00 673,457.00 246,729.00 114,106.00

13.38 113.25 677,484.00 693,332.00 5,907.39 1,842.33

262.53 262.53 95.00 95.00 95.00 95.00

265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41

Phase

Vapor Fraction - - 0.76 1.00 - -

Liquid Fraction 1.00 1.00 0.24 - 1.00 1.00

-117,900 -119,550 -75,500 -63,734 -109,940 -124,450

-902 -6,511 -2,852 -2,926 -1,085 -6,237

-4.6384.E+05 -4.0678.E+07 -2.9497.E+09 -1.9703.E+09 -2.6776.E+08 -7.1164.E+08

-207.02 -32.93 -18.10 -2.43 -174.53 -35.58

-1.58 -1.79 -0.68 -0.11 -1.72 -1.78

0.29 3.00 0.06 0.04 0.41 3.10

38.42 55.16 1.53 0.97 41.77 61.94

130.68 18.36 26.47 21.78 101.30 19.95

11.42 101.90 34,396.64 26,704.74 5,748.94 1,942.96

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 58: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

58

Table 8. Stream Table for Separation Streams 19-24

19 20 21 22 23 24

Methane 4,740.12 17.35 4,729.12 28.35 4,729.12 4,729.12

Water 150.56 11.36 53.39 108.54 53.39 53.39

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 9,402.98 172.68 9,273.06 302.60 9,273.06 9,273.06

Carbon Monoxide 5,487.44 8.39 5,482.37 13.45 5,482.37 5,482.37

Hydrogen 11,160.37 1.18 11,159.73 1.82 11,159.73 11,159.73

Nitrogen 161.67 0.23 161.53 0.37 161.53 161.53

Ethane 82.39 2.33 80.59 4.13 80.59 80.59

Propane 38.56 4.06 34.22 8.40 34.22 34.22

Butane 13.91 4.16 6.34 11.73 6.34 6.34

Naptha 168.83 2,209.00 35.02 2,342.81 35.02 35.02

Diesel 0.00 4.89 0.00 4.89 0.00 0.00

C21-C25 - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane 0.1509 0.0071 0.1525 0.0100 0.1525 0.1525

Water 0.0048 0.0047 0.0017 0.0384 0.0017 0.0017

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.2994 0.0709 0.2990 0.1070 0.2990 0.2990

Carbon Monoxide 0.1747 0.0034 0.1768 0.0048 0.1768 0.1768

Hydrogen 0.3553 0.0005 0.3598 0.0006 0.3598 0.3598

Nitrogen 0.0051 0.0001 0.0052 0.0001 0.0052 0.0052

Ethane 0.0026 0.0010 0.0026 0.0015 0.0026 0.0026

Propane 0.0012 0.0017 0.0011 0.0030 0.0011 0.0011

Butane 0.0004 0.0017 0.0002 0.0041 0.0002 0.0002

Naptha 0.0054 0.9070 0.0011 0.8287 0.0011 0.0011

Diesel 0.0000 0.0020 0.0000 0.0017 0.0000 0.0000

C21-C25 - 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

31,406.83 2,435.64 31,015.35 2,827.11 31,015.35 31,015.35

696,400.00 246,729.00 673,575.00 269,553.00 673,575.00 673,575.00

696,239.00 5,578.30 651,622.00 6,386.33 11,768,300.00 12,449,100.00

90.00 10.00 59.94 87.46 59.94 90.00

265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 14.70 14.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 - 1.00 - 1.00 1.00

Liquid Fraction 0.00 1.00 - 1.00 - -

-64,889 -114,340 -64,436 -112,460 -64,436 -64,201

-2,926 -1,129 -2,967 -1,180 -2,967 -2,956

-2.0379.E+09 -2.7849.E+08 -1.9985.E+09 -3.1795.E+08 -1.9985.E+09 -1.9912.E+09

-2.96 -182.78 -2.60 -161.75 3.15 3.59

-0.13 -1.80 -0.12 -1.70 0.14 0.17

0.05 0.44 0.05 0.44 0.00 0.00

1.00 44.23 1.03 42.21 0.06 0.05

22.17 101.30 21.72 95.35 21.72 21.72

27,209.14 5,748.94 26,699.16 6,258.91 26,699.16 26,699.16

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 59: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

59

Table 9. Stream Table for Separation Streams 25-30

25 26 27 28 29 30

Methane 189.14 189.14 189.14 27.37 0.98 3.45

Water 69,075.50 69,075.50 69,075.50 20.47 88.07 69.15

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 1,153.64 1,153.64 1,153.64 292.12 10.48 17.39

Carbon Monoxide 110.36 110.36 110.36 12.99 0.47 2.11

Hydrogen 25.92 25.92 25.92 1.76 0.06 0.54

Nitrogen 3.12 3.12 3.12 0.36 0.01 0.06

Ethane 17.39 17.39 17.39 3.99 0.14 0.28

Propane 28.98 28.98 28.98 8.11 0.29 0.44

Butane 36.23 36.23 36.23 11.33 0.41 0.59

Naptha 3.21 3.21 3.21 2,342.61 0.20 586.70

Diesel 0.07 0.07 0.07 4.89 0.00 13.11

C21-C25 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00

C26-C29 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00

C30-C35 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00

C36-C47 0.00 0.00 0.00 - - 0.00

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane 0.0027 0.0027 0.0027 0.0100 0.0097 0.0050

Water 0.9778 0.9778 0.9778 0.0075 0.8710 0.0997

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0163 0.0163 0.0163 0.1072 0.1036 0.0251

Carbon Monoxide 0.0016 0.0016 0.0016 0.0048 0.0046 0.0030

Hydrogen 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0006 0.0006 0.0008

Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

Ethane 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0015 0.0014 0.0004

Propane 0.0004 0.0004 0.0004 0.0030 0.0029 0.0006

Butane 0.0005 0.0005 0.0005 0.0042 0.0040 0.0008

Naptha 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.8594 0.0020 0.8456

Diesel 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0018 0.0000 0.0189

C21-C25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - - 0.0000

C30-C35 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - - 0.0000

C36-C47 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - - 0.0000

C48+ - - - - - -

70,643.65 70,643.65 70,643.65 2,725.98 101.11 693.80

1,305,750.00 1,305,750.00 1,305,750.00 267,413.00 2,139.23 67,970.56

2,782,410.00 2,782,410.00 390,711.00 6,354.75 34.51 389,942.00

197.42 197.42 90.00 86.00 86.00 310.00

14.70 14.70 14.70 265.41 265.41 14.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 0.08 0.08 0.01 - - 1.00

Liquid Fraction 0.92 0.92 0.99 1.00 1.00 -

-119,900 -119,900 -122,860 -112,260 -125,690 -85,514

-6,487 -6,487 -6,647 -1,144 -5,941 -873

-8.4702.E+09 -8.4702.E+09 -8.6791.E+09 -3.0602.E+08 -1.2708.E+07 -5.9330.E+07

-32.85 -32.85 -37.62 -166.92 -35.05 -134.88

-1.78 -1.78 -2.04 -1.70 -1.66 -1.38

0.03 0.03 0.18 0.43 2.93 0.00

0.47 0.47 3.34 42.08 61.99 0.17

18.48 18.48 18.48 98.10 21.16 97.97

21,374.49 21,374.49 21,374.49 6,221.39 37.51 1,572.75

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 60: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

60

Table 10. Stream Table for Separation Streams 31-36

31 32 33 34 35 36

Methane 0.00 3.45 3.45 0.00 1.71 1.71

Water 0.46 69.15 69.05 0.09 312.89 312.89

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.02 17.39 17.38 0.01 6.39 6.39

Carbon Monoxide 0.00 2.11 2.11 0.00 1.15 1.15

Hydrogen 0.00 0.54 0.54 0.00 0.39 0.39

Nitrogen 0.00 0.06 0.06 0.00 0.03 0.03

Ethane 0.00 0.28 0.28 0.00 0.11 0.11

Propane 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.00 0.19 0.19

Butane 0.01 0.59 0.58 0.00 0.33 0.33

Naptha 136.03 586.70 542.45 44.26 147.68 147.68

Diesel 332.21 13.11 0.53 12.58 894.99 894.99

C21-C25 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 208.35 208.35

C26-C29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 91.22 91.22

C30-C35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.83 73.83

C36-C47 0.00 0.00 - - 53.43 53.43

C48+ - - - - 12.79 12.79

Methane 0.0000 0.0050 0.0054 0.0000 0.0009 0.0009

Water 0.0010 0.0997 0.1084 0.0016 0.1733 0.1733

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0000 0.0251 0.0273 0.0001 0.0035 0.0035

Carbon Monoxide 0.0000 0.0030 0.0033 0.0000 0.0006 0.0006

Hydrogen 0.0000 0.0008 0.0008 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002

Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

Ethane 0.0000 0.0004 0.0004 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001

Propane 0.0000 0.0006 0.0007 0.0000 0.0001 0.0001

Butane 0.0000 0.0008 0.0009 0.0000 0.0002 0.0002

Naptha 0.2901 0.8456 0.8517 0.7772 0.0818 0.0818

Diesel 0.7085 0.0189 0.0008 0.2210 0.4957 0.4957

C21-C25 0.0003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.1154 0.1154

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0505 0.0505

C30-C35 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0409 0.0409

C36-C47 0.0000 0.0000 - - 0.0296 0.0296

C48+ - - - - 0.0071 0.0071

468.87 693.80 636.86 56.94 1,805.49 1,805.49

87,531.95 67,970.56 60,462.37 7,508.19 395,880.00 395,880.00

2,198.35 323,253.00 323,059.00 193.68 10,270.48 290,232.00

310.00 235.00 235.00 235.00 399.98 385.63

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 265.41 14.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction - 0.92 1.00 - 0.01 0.25

Liquid Fraction 1.00 0.08 - 1.00 0.99 0.75

-145,410 -90,358 -88,136 -115,210 -172,210 -172,210

-779 -922 -928 -874 -785 -785

-6.8175.E+07 -6.2691.E+07 -5.6130.E+07 -6.5604.E+06 -3.1092.E+08 -3.1092.E+08

-288.54 -141.52 -134.96 -214.80 -323.46 -322.45

-1.55 -1.44 -1.42 -1.63 -1.48 -1.47

0.21 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.18 0.01

39.82 0.21 0.19 38.77 38.55 1.36

186.69 97.97 94.94 131.86 219.26 219.26

1,867.46 1,572.75 1,404.01 168.74 8,088.57 8,088.57

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 61: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

61

Table 11. Stream Table for Separation Streams 37-42

37 38 39 40 41 42

Methane 1.71 1.71 1.71 0.00 1.71 0.00

Water 313.46 313.46 313.46 0.00 313.46 0.00

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 6.42 6.42 6.42 0.00 6.42 0.00

Carbon Monoxide 1.15 1.15 1.15 0.00 1.15 0.00

Hydrogen 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.00

Nitrogen 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.03 0.00

Ethane 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.11 0.00

Propane 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.00

Butane 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.00 0.35 0.00

Naptha 327.97 327.97 327.97 0.00 327.97 0.00

Diesel 1,239.78 1,239.78 1,239.60 0.17 0.74 1,238.86

C21-C25 208.48 208.48 0.01 208.48 0.00 0.01

C26-C29 91.22 91.22 0.00 91.22 0.00 0.00

C30-C35 73.83 73.83 0.00 73.83 - -

C36-C47 53.43 53.43 0.00 53.43 - -

C48+ 12.79 12.79 0.00 12.79 - -

Methane 0.0007 0.0007 0.0009 0.0000 0.0026 0.0000

Water 0.1345 0.1345 0.1657 0.0000 0.4804 0.0000

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0028 0.0028 0.0034 0.0000 0.0098 0.0000

Carbon Monoxide 0.0005 0.0005 0.0006 0.0000 0.0018 0.0000

Hydrogen 0.0002 0.0002 0.0002 0.0000 0.0006 0.0000

Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000

Ethane 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0000 0.0002 0.0000

Propane 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0003 0.0000

Butane 0.0001 0.0001 0.0002 0.0000 0.0005 0.0000

Naptha 0.1407 0.1407 0.1734 0.0000 0.5026 0.0000

Diesel 0.5318 0.5318 0.6554 0.0004 0.0011 1.0000

C21-C25 0.0894 0.0894 0.0000 0.4739 0.0000 0.0000

C26-C29 0.0391 0.0391 0.0000 0.2074 0.0000 0.0000

C30-C35 0.0317 0.0317 0.0000 0.1678 - -

C36-C47 0.0229 0.0229 0.0000 0.1215 - -

C48+ 0.0055 0.0055 0.0000 0.0291 - -

2,331.32 2,331.32 1,891.40 439.92 652.53 1,238.87

490,920.00 490,920.00 313,192.00 177,728.00 41,349.53 271,843.00

414,190.00 9,845,150.00 13,995,500.00 4,438.11 3,598,370.00 6,735.60

405.00 354.32 340.32 564.24 136.52 360.94

14.70 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16

Phase

Vapor Fraction 0.27 0.56 1.00 - 1.00 -

Liquid Fraction 0.73 0.44 - 1.00 - 1.00

-159,720 -159,720 -121,660 -239,780 -96,466 -160,360

-758 -758 -735 -594 -1,522 -731

-3.7236.E+08 -3.7236.E+08 -2.3011.E+08 -1.0548.E+08 -6.2947.E+07 -1.9866.E+08

-305.91 -303.83 -222.65 -560.25 -81.60 -330.50

-1.45 -1.44 -1.34 -1.39 -1.29 -1.51

0.01 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18

1.19 0.05 0.02 40.05 0.01 40.36

210.58 210.58 165.59 404.00 63.37 219.43

10,124.77 10,124.77 6,614.31 3,510.46 925.32 5,688.99

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 62: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

62

Table 12. Stream Table for Separation Streams 43-48

43 44 45 46 47 48

Methane 1.71 32.53 1.71 29.93 32.53 4,917.67

Water 313.46 402.98 313.46 67,623.29 402.98 69,015.07

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 6.42 315.92 6.42 352.62 315.92 10,441.02

Carbon Monoxide 1.15 16.25 1.15 13.68 16.25 5,592.12

Hydrogen 0.39 2.68 0.39 1.69 2.68 11,185.41

Nitrogen 0.03 0.45 0.03 0.37 0.45 164.63

Ethane 0.11 4.38 0.11 4.67 4.38 98.30

Propane 0.20 8.75 0.20 8.74 8.75 65.47

Butane 0.35 12.26 0.35 6.77 12.26 49.00

Naptha 327.97 3,213.03 327.97 0.01 3,213.03 3,072.78

Diesel 0.74 6.16 1,239.78 0.00 6.16 556.87

C21-C25 0.00 0.00 208.48 0.10 0.00 5.89

C26-C29 0.00 0.00 91.22 0.00 0.00 0.40

C30-C35 - 0.00 73.83 0.00 0.00 0.07

C36-C47 - - 53.43 0.00 - 0.00

C48+ - - 12.79 - - 0.00

Methane 0.0026 0.0081 0.0007 0.0004 0.0081 0.0468

Water 0.4804 0.1004 0.1345 0.9938 0.1004 0.6563

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0098 0.0787 0.0028 0.0052 0.0787 0.0993

Carbon Monoxide 0.0018 0.0040 0.0005 0.0002 0.0040 0.0532

Hydrogen 0.0006 0.0007 0.0002 0.0000 0.0007 0.1064

Nitrogen 0.0001 0.0001 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001 0.0016

Ethane 0.0002 0.0011 0.0000 0.0001 0.0011 0.0009

Propane 0.0003 0.0022 0.0001 0.0001 0.0022 0.0006

Butane 0.0005 0.0031 0.0001 0.0001 0.0031 0.0005

Naptha 0.5026 0.8002 0.1407 0.0000 0.8002 0.0292

Diesel 0.0011 0.0015 0.5318 0.0000 0.0015 0.0053

C21-C25 0.0000 0.0000 0.0894 0.0000 0.0000 0.0001

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0000 0.0391 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C30-C35 - 0.0000 0.0317 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C36-C47 - - 0.0229 0.0000 - 0.0000

C48+ - - 0.0055 - - 0.0000

652.53 4,015.38 2,331.32 68,041.85 4,015.38 105,164.70

41,349.53 369,225.00 490,920.00 1,235,600.00 369,225.00 2,427,944.93

361,371.00 529,409.00 345,281.00 19,784.54 304,824.00 3,597,379.09

298.72 165.48 366.33 67.63 95.00 386.70

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 265.41

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 0.28 0.24 - 0.18 1.00

Liquid Fraction - 0.72 0.76 1.00 0.82 0.00

-91,875 -105,120 -165,430 -123,150 -109,770 -89,631

-1,450 -1,143 -786 -6,782 -1,194 -3,882

-5.9952.E+07 -4.2210.E+08 -3.8566.E+08 -8.3795.E+09 -4.4077.E+08 -9.4260.E+09

-79.85 -146.59 -312.60 -38.93 -154.34 -12.48

-1.26 -1.59 -1.48 -2.14 -1.68 -0.54

0.00 0.01 0.01 3.44 0.01 0.03

0.11 0.70 1.42 62.45 1.21 0.67

63.37 91.95 210.58 18.16 91.95 23.09

925.32 8,550.72 10,124.77 19,923.82 8,550.72 58,269.07

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 63: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

63

Table 13. Stream Table for Separation Streams 49-AIR

49 50 51 52 53 AIR

Methane 0.04 32.04 4,740.12 32.04 3.45 -

Water 330.37 63.24 150.56 63.24 69.60 -

Oxygen - - - - - 10,500.00

Carbon Dioxide 1.81 296.10 9,402.98 296.10 17.41 -

Carbon Monoxide 0.01 16.14 5,487.44 16.14 2.11 -

Hydrogen 0.00 2.68 11,160.37 2.68 0.54 -

Nitrogen 0.00 0.45 161.67 0.45 0.06 39,500.00

Ethane 0.04 3.95 82.39 3.95 0.28 -

Propane 0.24 6.13 38.56 6.13 0.45 -

Butane 0.66 4.97 13.91 4.97 0.60 -

Naptha 0.00 66.32 168.83 66.32 722.74 -

Diesel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 345.31 -

C21-C25 0.00 - - - 0.13 -

C26-C29 - - - - 0.00 -

C30-C35 - - - - 0.00 -

C36-C47 - - - - 0.00 -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane 0.0001 0.0651 0.1509 0.0651 0.0030 -

Water 0.9916 0.1285 0.0048 0.1285 0.0599 -

Oxygen - - - - - 0.2100

Carbon Dioxide 0.0054 0.6018 0.2994 0.6018 0.0150 -

Carbon Monoxide 0.0000 0.0328 0.1747 0.0328 0.0018 -

Hydrogen 0.0000 0.0055 0.3553 0.0055 0.0005 -

Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0009 0.0051 0.0009 0.0001 0.7900

Ethane 0.0001 0.0080 0.0026 0.0080 0.0002 -

Propane 0.0007 0.0125 0.0012 0.0125 0.0004 -

Butane 0.0020 0.0101 0.0004 0.0101 0.0005 -

Naptha 0.0000 0.1348 0.0054 0.1348 0.6216 -

Diesel 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2970 -

C21-C25 0.0000 - - - 0.0001 -

C26-C29 - - - - 0.0000 -

C30-C35 - - - - 0.0000 -

C36-C47 - - - - 0.0000 -

C48+ - - - - - -

333.18 492.02 31,406.83 492.02 1,162.67 50,000.00

6,082.76 22,942.82 696,400.00 22,942.82 155,502.07 1,442,519.86

100.85 209,789.00 718,734.00 17,747.36 5,030.01 20,434,359.10

124.24 124.24 106.77 432.43 380.99 100.00

14.70 14.70 265.41 265.41 265.41 14.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction - 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.02 1.00

Liquid Fraction 1.00 - 0.00 - 0.98 -

-122,070 -131,900 -64,727 -127,080 -109,666 160

-6,687 -2,829 -2,919 -2,725 -820 6

-4.0673.E+07 -6.4898.E+07 -2.0329.E+09 -6.2525.E+07 -1.2751.E+08 8.0154.E+06

-37.32 -22.66 -2.67 -21.83 -198.51 1.31

-2.04 -0.49 -0.12 -0.47 -1.48 0.05

3.30 0.00 0.04 0.03 0.23 0.00

60.31 0.11 0.97 1.29 30.91 0.07

18.26 46.63 22.17 46.63 133.75 28.85

98.57 504.40 27,209.14 504.40 3,440.20 42,895.68

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 64: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

64

Table 14. Stream Table for Separation Streams FuelAir-Waste H2O

DIESEL FTR FUELAIR FUELGAS NAPTHA WASTEH2O

Methane 0.00 4,918.70 29.93 4,888.33 0.44 0.00

Water 0.00 69,138.23 1,108.78 1,505.60 9.38 66,514.50

Oxygen - - 10,480.22 - - 19.78

Carbon Dioxide 0.00 10,444.72 352.62 10,074.08 18.01 0.00

Carbon Monoxide 0.00 5,592.83 13.68 5,579.05 0.10 0.00

Hydrogen 0.00 11,185.65 1.69 11,183.96 0.00 0.00

Nitrogen 0.00 164.65 39,441.98 164.27 0.00 58.39

Ethane 0.00 98.37 4.67 93.32 0.39 0.00

Propane 0.00 65.58 8.74 54.46 2.38 0.00

Butane 0.00 49.19 6.74 35.80 6.62 0.02

Naptha 0.00 3,184.93 0.01 38.22 3,146.70 0.00

Diesel 1,238.86 1,245.26 0.00 0.07 6.16 0.00

C21-C25 0.01 208.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10

C26-C29 0.00 91.22 0.00 0.00 - 0.00

C30-C35 - 73.83 0.00 0.00 - 0.00

C36-C47 - 53.43 0.00 0.00 - 0.00

C48+ - 12.79 - - - -

Methane 0.0000 0.0462 0.0006 0.1454 0.0001 0.0000

Water 0.0000 0.6490 0.0216 0.0448 0.0029 0.9988

Oxygen - - 0.2037 - - 0.0003

Carbon Dioxide 0.0000 0.0980 0.0069 0.2997 0.0056 0.0000

Carbon Monoxide 0.0000 0.0525 0.0003 0.1660 0.0000 0.0000

Hydrogen 0.0000 0.1050 0.0000 0.3327 0.0000 0.0000

Nitrogen 0.0000 0.0015 0.7666 0.0049 0.0000 0.0009

Ethane 0.0000 0.0009 0.0001 0.0028 0.0001 0.0000

Propane 0.0000 0.0006 0.0002 0.0016 0.0007 0.0000

Butane 0.0000 0.0005 0.0001 0.0011 0.0021 0.0000

Naptha 0.0000 0.0299 0.0000 0.0011 0.9864 0.0000

Diesel 1.0000 0.0117 0.0000 0.0000 0.0019 0.0000

C21-C25 0.0000 0.0020 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000

C26-C29 0.0000 0.0009 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000

C30-C35 - 0.0007 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000

C36-C47 - 0.0005 0.0000 0.0000 - 0.0000

C48+ - 0.0001 - - - -

1,238.87 106,528.00 51,449.06 33,617.15 3,190.18 66,592.79

271,843.00 2,769,090.00 1,477,540.45 743,723.00 340,199.00 1,200,578.74

6,735.60 3,700,070.00 19,751,003.80 13,450,400.00 8,322.56 19,164.66

360.94 408.49 66.05 88.25 124.24 58.18

1.16 265.41 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction - 0.99 1.00 1.00 - -

Liquid Fraction 1.00 0.01 - - 1.00 1.00

-160,360 -90,610 -3,526 -68,145 -105,070 -122,987

-731 -3,486 -123 -3,080 -985 -6,822

-1.9866.E+08 -9.6525.E+09 -1.8141.E+08 -2.2908.E+09 -3.3520.E+08 -8.1900.E+09

-330.50 -16.77 0.90 3.13 -186.67 -39.39

-1.51 -0.65 0.03 0.14 -1.75 -2.18

0.18 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.38 3.47

40.36 0.75 0.07 0.06 40.88 62.65

219.43 25.99 28.72 22.12 106.64 18.03

5,688.99 65,220.87 43,520.22 28,149.84 7,947.74 19,299.28

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 65: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

65

Table 15. Stream Table for Separation Streams FuelAir-Waste H2O

WAX

Methane 0.00

Water 0.00

Oxygen -

Carbon Dioxide 0.00

Carbon Monoxide 0.00

Hydrogen 0.00

Nitrogen 0.00

Ethane 0.00

Propane 0.00

Butane 0.00

Naptha 0.00

Diesel 0.17

C21-C25 208.48

C26-C29 91.22

C30-C35 73.83

C36-C47 53.43

C48+ 12.79

Methane 0.0000

Water 0.0000

Oxygen -

Carbon Dioxide 0.0000

Carbon Monoxide 0.0000

Hydrogen 0.0000

Nitrogen 0.0000

Ethane 0.0000

Propane 0.0000

Butane 0.0000

Naptha 0.0000

Diesel 0.0004

C21-C25 0.4739

C26-C29 0.2074

C30-C35 0.1678

C36-C47 0.1215

C48+ 0.0291

439.92

177,728.00

4,593.45

564.24

1.16

Phase

Vapor Fraction 0.00

Liquid Fraction 1.00

-239,780

-594

-1.0548.E+08

-560.25

-1.39

0.10

38.69

404.00

3,510.46

Stream Number

Mole Fraction

Pressure (psia)

Temperature (°F)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Density (lbm/ft3)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Page 66: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

66

Table 16. Stream Table for Heat Integration Cool1-1 to Cool2-3

COOL1-1 COOL1IN COOL1OUT COOL2-1 COOL2-2 COOL2-3

Methane - - - - - -

Water 344,850.00 344,850.00 344,850.00 929,600.00 929,600.00 929,600.00

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide - - - - - -

Carbon Monoxide - - - - - -

Hydrogen - - - - - -

Nitrogen - - - - - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane - - - - - -

Water 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide - - - - - -

Carbon Monoxide - - - - - -

Hydrogen - - - - - -

Nitrogen - - - - - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

344,850.00 344,850.00 344,850.00 929,600.00 929,600.00 929,600.00

6,212,569.31 6,212,569.31 6,212,569.31 16,747,004.30 16,747,004.30 16,747,004.30

102,491.35 100,555.61 102,524.06 271,121.98 273,037.01 273,104.55

119.34 85.00 119.90 85.39 98.23 98.67

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Liquid Fraction - - - - - -

-122,104 -122,688 -122,094 -122,682 -122,466 -122,458

-6,778 -6,810 -6,777 -6,810 -6,798 -6,797

-42,110,000,000 -42,310,000,000 -42,100,000,000 -114,000,000,000 -113,800,000,000 -113,800,000,000

-38 -39 -38 -39 -38 -38

-2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -2

3 3 3 3 3 3

61 62 61 62 61 61

18 18 18 18 18 18

99,708 99,708 99,708 268,778 268,778 268,778

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Density (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Temperature (°F)

Pressure (psia)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Stream Number

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Mole Fraction

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Page 67: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

67

Table 17. Stream Table for Heat Integration Cool2In to LP1Out

COOL2IN COOL2OUT COOL3IN COOL3OUT LP1IN LP1OUT

Methane - - - - - -

Water 929,600.00 929,600.00 31,400.00 31,400.00 50,000.00 50,000.00

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide - - - - - -

Carbon Monoxide - - - - - -

Hydrogen - - - - - -

Nitrogen - - - - - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

Methane - - - - - -

Water 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000

Oxygen - - - - - -

Carbon Dioxide - - - - - -

Carbon Monoxide - - - - - -

Hydrogen - - - - - -

Nitrogen - - - - - -

Ethane - - - - - -

Propane - - - - - -

Butane - - - - - -

Naptha - - - - - -

Diesel - - - - - -

C21-C25 - - - - - -

C26-C29 - - - - - -

C30-C35 - - - - - -

C36-C47 - - - - - -

C48+ - - - - - -

929,600.00 929,600.00 31,400.00 31,400.00 50,000.00 50,000.00

16,747,004.30 16,747,004.30 565,679.79 565,679.79 900,764.00 900,764.00

271,064.22 276,383.75 9,156.00 9,335.55 16,209.20 11,129,643.60

85.00 119.99 85.00 119.96 258.86 260.00

14.70 14.70 14.70 14.70 34.70 34.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 -

Liquid Fraction - - - - - -

-122,688 -122,093 -122,688 -122,093 -119,478 -102,481

-6,810 -6,777 -6,810 -6,777 -6,632 -5,689

-114,100,000,000 -113,500,000,000 -3,852,000,000 -3,834,000,000 -5,974,000,000 -5,124,000,000

-39 -38 -39 -38 -34 -10

-2 -2 -2 -2 -2 -1

3 3 3 3 3 0

62 61 62 61 56 0

18 18 18 18 18 18

268,778 268,778 9,079 9,079 14,457 14,457

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Density (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Temperature (°F)

Pressure (psia)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Stream Number

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Mole Fraction

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Page 68: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

68

Table 18. Stream Table for Heat Integration MP1In and MP1Out

MP1IN MP1OUT

Methane - -

Water 1,950.00 1,950.00

Oxygen - -

Carbon Dioxide - -

Carbon Monoxide - -

Hydrogen - -

Nitrogen - -

Ethane - -

Propane - -

Butane - -

Naptha - -

Diesel - -

C21-C25 - -

C26-C29 - -

C30-C35 - -

C36-C47 - -

C48+ - -

Methane - -

Water 1.0000 1.0000

Oxygen - -

Carbon Dioxide - -

Carbon Monoxide - -

Hydrogen - -

Nitrogen - -

Ethane - -

Propane - -

Butane - -

Naptha - -

Diesel - -

C21-C25 - -

C26-C29 - -

C30-C35 - -

C36-C47 - -

C48+ - -

1,950.00 1,950.00

35,129.80 35,129.80

678.26 120,546.16

353.04 353.03

139.70 139.70

Phase

Vapor Fraction 1.00 0.01

Liquid Fraction - -

-117,390 -101,869

-6,516 -5,655

-228,910,359 -198,645,173

-31 -12

-2 -1

3 0

52 0

18 18

564 564

Entropy (Btu/lbm-R)

Density (lbmol/ft3)

Density (lbm/ft3)

Average Molecular Weight

Liquid Volume, 60°F (lbm/ft3)

Temperature (°F)

Pressure (psia)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbmol)

Enthalpy (Btu/lbm)

Enthalpy (Btu/hr)

Entropy (Btu/lbmol-R)

Stream Number

Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Mole Fraction

Total Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)

Total Mass Flow Rate (lbm/hr)

Total Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

Page 69: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

69

Appendix A.2 –Economics Summary

Table 19. Economic Summary Breakdown

Revenue

Unit Price ($) Units per Year Yearly Profit ($/year)

Products

LPG (C3, C4) ($0.30/lb.) 0.30$ 4,161,649.73 1,248,494.92$

Naphtha (C5 - C10) ($75.00/bbl.) 75.00$ 14,567,835.50 1,092,587,662.17$

Diesel (C10 - C20) ($90.00/bbl.) 90.00$ 10,524,316.93 947,188,523.57$

Total Product Revenue 29,253,802.16 2,041,024,680.65$

Credits

600 psia, 490°F HP Steam ($4.00/klbm) 4.00$ 15,088,319.41 60,353,277.64$

120 psia, 353°F MP Steam ($3.00/klbm) 3.00$ 94,263,783.12 282,791,349.37$

20 psia, 260°F LP Steam ($2.50/klbm) 2.50$ 7,233,134.92 18,082,837.30$

Electricity ($0.03/kW-h) 0.03$ - -$

Fuel Gas ($2.00/MBTU) 2.00$ 22,021,992.58 44,043,985.17$

Steam Condensate (99.9% v/v pure) ($2.00/klbm) 2.00$ 21,045,670.68 42,091,341.37$

Process/Cooling Tower Water (95% v/v Pure) ($0.35/kgal) 0.35$ 1,234,378,855.35 432,032,599.37$

Total Credits Revenue 1,394,031,756.08 879,395,390.22$

Total Revenue 2,920,420,070.88$

Variable Costs

Unit Price ($) Units per Year Yearly Cost ($/year)

Raw Materials Costs

Methane Feed ($2,000/MSCF) 2,000.00$ 167,291.67 334,583,333.33$

Hydrogen ($0.06/lb.) 0.06$ 7,984,590.67 479,075.44$

Carbon Dioxide (500psig, 100°F) ($400/MSCF) 400.00$ 54,194.59 21,677,835.89$

Oxygen ($100/short ton) 100.00$ 4,188,496.24 418,849,623.65$

Catalyst ($10/lb.) 10.00$ 3,450,922.88 34,509,228.77$

Total Raw Materials Costs 15,845,496.04 810,099,097.09$

Utilities

600 psia, 490°F HP Steam (klbm/hr) ($5/klbm) 5.00$ 24,966,493.34 124,832,466.70$

125psia, 353°F MP Steam (klbm/hr) ($4/klbm) 4.00$ 50,102.66 200,410.65$

20 psia, 260°F LP Steam (klbm/hr) ($3.5/klbm) 3.50$ - -$

Electricity (kw-hr/hr) ($0.04/kW-hr) 0.04$ 33,049,801.20 1,321,992.05$

Fuel Gas (MBTU/hr) ($3/MBTU) 3.00$ 737,297.85 2,211,893.54$

Steam Condensate (99.9% v/v pure) ($2.00/klbm) 2.00$ 111,386,648.86 222,773,297.72$

Process/Cooling Tower Water (95% v/v Pure) (kgal/hr) ($0.5/kgal) 0.50$ 1,231,732,522.81 615,866,261.40$

Waste Water Treatment (75% v/v Pure) (kgal/hr) ($6/kgal) 6.00$ - -$

Total Utility Costs 1,401,922,866.72 967,206,322.06$

Total Variable Costs 1,777,305,419.14$

Fixed Costs

Yearly Operating Expenses 30,614,848.25$

HI Unit Capital Recovery 100,000,000.00$

Syngas Unit Capital Recovery 400,000,000.00$

Depreciation 68,032,996.12$

Total Fixed Costs 598,647,844.38$

Total Manufacturing Costs 2,375,953,263.52$

15 Year Service Life, No Salvage

3% of total Capital Investment

Page 70: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

70

Table 21. Products Breakdown

Unit Price

From HI Unit

(Units/Hour)

Syngas Unit

(Units/hr)

From Air

Separation Unit

(Units/Hour)

Waste Water

(Units/hr)

Miscellaneous

(Units/Hour)

Distillation

Columns

(Units/Hour)

Heat

Exchangers

(Units/Hour)

Fuel Gas

(Units/Hour)

Total

(Units/Hour)

Boiler Makeup

and Cooling

Water Makeup Total ($/hr)

Methane (MSCF/hr) ($2000/SMCF) 2,000.00$ - 20.83 - - - - - - 20.83 - 41,666.67$

Hydrogen (lbm/hr) ($0.06/lbm) 0.06$ 994.35 - - - - - - - 994.35 - 59.66$

Carbon Dioxide ($400/MSCF) 400.00$ - 6.75 - - - - - - 6.75 - 2,699.61$

Oxygen (Short Ton/hr) ($100/Short Ton) 100.00$ - 260.80 260.80 - - - - - 521.61 - 52,160.60$

Nitrogen (lbm/hr) ($0.05/lbm) -$ - - - - - - - - - - -$

-

-

600 psia, 490°F HP Steam (klbm/hr) ($5/klbm) 4.00$ - 494.51 2,608.03 - - 6.61 - - 3,109.15 - 12,436.61$

125psia, 353°F MP Steam (klbm/hr) ($4/klbm) 3.00$ 6.24 - - - - - - - 6.24 - 18.72$

20 psia, 260°F LP Steam (klbm/hr) ($3.5/klbm) 2.50$ - - - - - - - - - - -$

Electricity (kw-hr/hr) ($0.04/kW-hr) 0.04$ 1,559.86 - - - 2,555.93 - - - 4,115.79 - 164.63$

Fuel Gas (MBTU/hr) ($3/MBTU) 3.00$ 49.92 - - - - 41.90 - - 91.82 - 275.45$

Steam Condensate (99.9% v/v pure) (klbm/hr) ($2.00/1000 gal) 2.00$ - - - - 253.37 - 13,617.95 - 13,871.31 - 27,742.63$

Process/Cooling Tower Water (95% v/v Pure) (kgal/hr) ($0.5/kgal) 0.50$ 187.18 - 150,222.53 - - 117.97 2,863.66 - 153,391.35 - 76,695.67$

Waste Water Treatment (75% v/v Pure) (kgal/hr) ($6/kgal) 6.00$ - - - - - - - - - - -$

-

-

600 psia, 490°F HP Steam (klbm/hr) ($4.00/1000 lbm) 4.00$ - - - - - - 1,878.99 - 1,878.99 - 7,515.97$

120 psia, 353°F MP Steam (klbm/hr) ($3.00/1000 lbm) 3.00$ - - - - - - 11,738.95 - 11,738.95 - 35,216.86$

20 psia, 260°F LP Steam (klbm/hr) ($2.50/1000 lbm) 2.50$ - - - - - - 900.76 - 900.76 - 2,251.91$

Electricity (kw-hr/hr) ($0.03/kW-h) 0.03$ - - - - - - - - - - -$

Fuel Gas (MBTU/hr) ($2.00/MBTU) 2.00$ - - - - - - - 2,742.46 2,742.46 - 5,484.93$

Steam Condensate (99.9% v/v pure) (klbm/hr) ($2.00/1000 gal) 2.00$ 6.24 - 2,608.03 - - 6.61 - - 2,620.88 (78.63) 5,241.76$

Process/Cooling Tower Water (95% v/v Pure) (kgal/hr) ($0.35/1000gal) 0.35$ 187.18 - 150,222.53 144.68 253.37 117.97 2,795.17 - 153,720.90 (3,764.40) 53,802.32$

Waste Water Treatment (75% v/v Pure) (kgal/hr) ($6/kgal) 6.00$ - - - - - - - - - - -$

213,920.25$

Utilities and Credits Breakdown

Total

Raw Materials

Utilities

Credits

Unit Price Unit per Hour Total ($/hr)

LPG (C3, C4) ($0.4/lbm) 0.40$ 12,438.31 4,975.32$

Naptha (C5 - C10) ($75/bbl) 75.00$ 1,814.18 136,063.22$

Diesel (C11 - C20) ($90/bbl) 90.00$ 1,310.62 117,956.23$

258,994.77$

Products Breakdown

Products

Total

Table 20. Utilities and Credits Breakdown

Page 71: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

71

Table 22. Inflation Effects on Profitability

Table 24. Economics Summary

year Revenue ($/year) Manufacturing Costs ($/year) Depreciation ($/year) Cash Flow ($/year)

0 2,920,420,070.88$ 2,307,920,267.40$ 68,032,996.12$ 432,825,757.05$

1 3,008,032,673.01$ 2,377,157,875.42$ 68,032,996.12$ 445,137,003.10$

2 3,098,273,653.20$ 2,448,472,611.68$ 68,032,996.12$ 457,817,586.53$

3 3,191,221,862.79$ 2,521,926,790.03$ 68,032,996.12$ 470,878,587.47$

4 3,286,958,518.68$ 2,597,584,593.74$ 68,032,996.12$ 484,331,418.43$

5 3,385,567,274.24$ 2,675,512,131.55$ 68,032,996.12$ 498,187,834.32$

6 3,487,134,292.46$ 2,755,777,495.49$ 68,032,996.12$ 512,459,942.69$

7 3,591,748,321.24$ 2,838,450,820.36$ 68,032,996.12$ 527,160,214.31$

8 3,699,500,770.87$ 2,923,604,344.97$ 68,032,996.12$ 542,301,494.08$

9 3,810,485,794.00$ 3,011,312,475.32$ 68,032,996.12$ 557,897,012.24$

10 3,924,800,367.82$ 3,101,651,849.58$ 68,032,996.12$ 573,960,395.94$

11 4,042,544,378.85$ 3,194,701,405.07$ 68,032,996.12$ 590,505,681.16$

12 4,163,820,710.22$ 3,290,542,447.22$ 68,032,996.12$ 607,547,324.93$

13 4,288,735,331.53$ 3,389,258,720.63$ 68,032,996.12$ 625,100,218.02$

14 4,417,397,391.47$ 3,490,936,482.25$ 68,032,996.12$ 643,179,697.90$

15 4,549,919,313.22$ 3,595,664,576.72$ 68,032,996.12$ 661,801,562.17$

Inflation Effects on Profitability

Down Time (Months) 1

Service Factor 0.92

Operating Life (Years) 15

Tax Rate (33%) 0.33

Total Equipment Costs ($2010) 212,603,112.88$

Lang Factor 4.8

Total Capital Investment ($2010) 1,020,494,941.82$

Depreciation 68,032,996.12$

Revenue ($/year) 2,920,420,070.88$

Manufacturing Costs ($/year) 2,375,953,263.52$

Gross Profit ($/year) 544,466,807.36$

Net Profit ($/year) 364,792,760.93$

Cash Flow ($/year) 432,825,757.05$

DCFRR (%) 42.20%

Cash Flow Payback Period (years) 2.36

Return on Investment (%/year) 35.75%

Interest Rate (%) 8%

Future Value of Earnings ($2010) 11,752,134,266.21$

Present Value of Earnings ($2010) 3,704,762,843.07$

Net Present Worth of Plant ($2010) 2,684,267,901.25$

Economics Summary

Table 23. Energy Efficiency

Metahne Carbon (lbm/hr) 659,375.78

Diesel Carbon (lbm/hr) 226,225.73

Naphtha Carbon (lbmC/hr) 230,294.46

HI Unit Carbon (lbmC/hr) 145,842.37

Carbon Efficency (%) 91%

Energy Efficiency

Page 72: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

72

Appendix A.3 – Equipment Sizing Summary

Table 25. Equipotent Costs Summary

Fischer-Tropsch Reactors Separation

Reactors (43) 112,941,932.69$ Flash Drums

112,941,932.69$ Flash Drum 1 15,077,467.40$

Flash Drum 2 24,982,093.40$

Heat Integration and Steam Generation Flash Drum 3 1,145,707.06$

Heat Exchanger 1 619,713.84$ Flash Drum 4 16,105,093.61$

Heat Exchanger 2 34,315.66$ Flash Drum 5 1,236,657.18$

Heat Exchanger 3 4,256,875.63$ Flash Drum 6 110,971.38$

Heat Exchanger 4 305,247.34$ Flash Drum 7 116,036.98$

Heat Exchanger 5 2,133,654.58$ Flash Drum 8 47,271.07$

Heat Exchanger 6 25,602.86$ 58,821,298.07$

Heat Exchanger 7 1,082,934.26$

Heat Exchanger 8 5,939,158.30$

Heat Exchanger 9 995,320.55$ Decanter 1 38,950.49$

Heat Exchanger 10 12,987.46$ Total 38,950.49$

Heat Exchanger 11 377,255.89$

Heat Exchanger 12 638,453.56$

Heat Exchanger 13 4,003,341.68$ Distillation Column 1 5,162,589.48$

Heat Exchanger 14 44,495.26$ Distillation Column 2 2,331,833.54$

Heat Exchanger 15 719,040.64$ Absorber 617,227.81$

Heat Exchanger 16 385,149.88$ Stripper 1 900,839.18$

21,573,547.38$ Stripper 2 1,798,965.39$

Total 7,494,423.02$

Refrigeration

Compressor 80,000.00$

Condenser 331,260.89$ Compressor 1 231,595.27$

Evaporator 39,702.05$ Compressor 2 198,510.23$

450,962.94$ Fired Heater 10,587,212.46$

Blower 264,680.31$

Total 11,281,998.28$

Total Equipment Costs 212,603,112.88$

Distillation Columns

Decanter

Cost ($2010)

Miscellaneous Equipment

Total

Total

Total

Total

Page 73: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

73

Table 26. Heat Exchanger Sizing Summary, Heat Exchangers 1-8

Table 27. Heat Exchanger Sizing Summary, Heat Exchangers 9-16

Heat Exchanger 1

(Vacuum)

Heat Exchanger 2

(Absorb)

Heat Exchanger 3

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 4

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 5

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 6

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 7

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 8

(LP Steam)

Pressure (psia) 265.41 14.70 14.70 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41 265.41

Pressure (kPa) 1,829.93 101.33 101.33 1,829.93 1,829.93 1,829.93 1,829.93 1,829.93

Thin (⁰F) 408.49 197.42 196.38 107.61 262.52 265.61 322.89 365.00

Thout (⁰F) 396.69 196.38 90.00 90.00 95.00 250.00 260.00 322.89

Tcin (⁰F) 366.34 58.97 85.00 85.00 85.39 98.23 98.37 258.86

Tcout (⁰F) 405.00 90.00 119.34 85.39 98.23 98.37 119.99 260.00

Duty (Q) (Btu/hr) 13,298,509.80 7,508,704.81 201,448,612.00 6,087,116.51 200,820,741.00 7,048,922.85 339,500,782.00 849,852,921.00

Uo (Btu/hr-ft2-°F) 39.62 39.62 39.62 39.62 39.62 39.62 39.62 39.62

LMTD (⁰F) 12.42 121.80 26.34 11.54 54.49 159.38 181.49 82.84

Area (ft2) 27,015.78 1,555.79 192,997.01 13,306.94 93,014.44 1,116.13 47,209.39 258,911.40

Number of 6000ft3 Heat Exchangers 4.50 0.26 32.17 2.22 15.50 0.19 7.87 43.15

Cost of Heat Exchanger ($2010) 619,713.84$ 34,315.66$ 4,256,875.63$ 305,247.34$ 2,133,654.58$ 25,602.86$ 1,082,934.26$ 5,939,158.30$

Heat Exchanger 9

(MPSteam)

Heat Exchanger 10

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 11

(HP Steam)

Heat Exchanger 12

(MPSteam)

Heat Exchanger

13 (SynFeed)

Heat Exchanger 14

(Water)

Heat Exchanger 15

(SynFeed)

Heat Exchanger 16

(Naphtha Sep)

Pressure (psia) 265.41 265.41 614.70 314.70 314.70 14.70 314.70 265.41

Pressure (kPa) 1,829.93 1,829.93 4,238.18 2,169.75 2,169.75 101.33 2,169.75 1,829.93

Thin (⁰F) 396.69 310.00 1,358.07 500.47 1,883.77 165.28 1,950.00 396.69

Thout (⁰F) 365.00 235.00 500.47 425.00 1,358.07 95.00 1,883.77 386.70

Tcin (⁰F) 353.00 119.34 488.96 353.04 306.08 85.00 75.00 265.61

Tcout (⁰F) 353.00 119.90 490.00 353.03 1,000.00 119.97 1,000.00 380.99

Duty (Q) (Btu/hr) 42,164,981.60 3,360,858.23 115,783,640.00 116,053,926.00 890,187,130.00 18,682,218.10 114,847,111.00 11,897,607.00

Uo (Btu/hr-ft2-°F) 39.62 39.62 39.62 39.62 5.28 396.25 5.28 39.62

LMTD (⁰F) 24.52 149.81 198.17 105.23 965.44 23.37 1,333.62 51.59

Area (ft2) 43,389.96 566.17 14,744.76 27,832.72 174,521.50 2,017.31 16,299.83 5,820.55

Number of 6000ft3 Heat Exchangers 7.23 0.09 2.46 4.64 29.09 0.34 2.72 0.97

Cost of Heat Exchanger ($2010) 995,320.55$ 12,987.46$ 377,255.89$ 638,453.56$ 4,003,341.68$ 44,495.26$ 719,040.64$ 385,149.88$

Page 74: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

74

Table 28. Flash Drum Sizing Summary

Table 29. Decanter Sizing Summary

Flash 1 Flash 2 Flash 3 Flash 4 Flash 5 Flash 6 Flash 7 Flash 8

Vessel Diameter (ft) 25.8989899 28.09742619 20.7219173 24.65322086 21.54593783 6.219369156 6.219369156 6.366149563

Vessel Height (ft) 77.70 84.29 62.17 73.96 64.64 18.66 19.10 30.79

Vessel Volume (ft3) 40931.68421 52264.97572 20965.29341 35304.66827 23567.16505 566.8264956 580.2039012 979.9377014

Pressure (psia) 265.409475 265.409475 265.409475 265.409475 265.409475 265.409475 265.409475 14.695949

Temperature (°F) 408.493586 408.493586 408.493586 408.493586 408.493586 408.493586 408.493586 95

Number of Flash Drums 6.00 12.00 1.00 10.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

Total Cost of Vessel ($2010) 15,077,467.40$ 24,982,093.40$ 1,145,707.06$ 16,105,093.61$ 1,236,657.18$ 110,971.38$ 116,036.98$ 47,271.07$

Flash Drum Summary

Flash 1

Vessel Diameter (ft) 3.577339635

Vessel Height (ft) 10.73

Vessel Volume (ft3) 107.8677597

Pressure (psia) 265.409475

Temperature (°F) 408.493586

Number of Flash Drums 1.00

Total Cost of Vessel ($2010) 38,950.49$

Decanter Summary

Page 75: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

75

Table 30. Distillation Column Sizing Summary

Table 31. Compressor Sizing Summary

Table 32. Fired Heater Sizing Summary

Distillation 1 Distillation 2 Absorber 1 Stripper 1 Stripper 2

Column Diameter (ft) 25.121 25.8033 13.2 28.64176 25.94875

Column Height (ft) 28 16 14 16 26

Number of Stages 14 8 7 8 13

Column Pressure (psia) 1.1602033 1.1602033 265.409475 14.695949 14.695949

Tray Type Sieve Sieve Sieve Sieve Sieve

Condenser Temperature (°F) 340.316 230 230 230 230

Condenser Duty (Btu/hr) 5137357.3 36306024 0 0 0

Condenser Surface Area (ft2) 432.8270914 5731.23527 0 0 0

Reboiler Temperature (°F) 564 360 400 400 400

Reboiler Duty (Btu/hr) 698,373.88 130.00 90.00 90.00 90.00

Reboiler Surface Area (ft2) 0 3 6 9 12

Reboiler Steam Required (klbm/hr) 0 6.611063346 0 0 0

Reboiler Fuel Gas Required (MBTU/hr) 41.90 6,611.06 - - -

Condenser Cooling Water Required (kgal/hr) 0 117.9709322 0 0 0

Number of Columns 1 1 1 1 2

Total Column Cost ($2010) 5,162,589.48$ 2,331,833.54$ 617,227.81$ 900,839.18$ 1,798,965.39$

Distillation Column Summary

877.89

231,595.27$

695.48

198,510.23$

36,781,846.50

19,851.02$ Cost of Blower ($2010)

Compressor Summary

Compressor 1 Duty (kW)

Cost of Compressor 1 ($2010)

Compressor 2 Duty (kW)

Cost of Compressor 2 ($2010)

Volumetric Flow Rate (ft3/hr)

2,742.46

10,587,212.46$

Fuel Gas Duty (MBTU/hr)

Cost of Fired Heater ($2010)

Fired Heater Summary

Page 76: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

76

Table 33. Refrigeration Summary

Table 34. Reactor Sizing Summary

982.56

264,680.31$

Evaporator

Thin (⁰F) 95.00

Thout (⁰F) 20.00

Tcin (⁰F) 10.00

Tcout (⁰F) 10.00

Duty (Q) (Btu/hr) 10,728,433.00

Area (ft2) 2,040.85

Cost of Evaporator 39,702.05$

Condenser

Thin (⁰F) 114.00

Thout (⁰F) 95.00

Tcin (⁰F) 85.00

Tcout (⁰F) 110.00

Duty (Q) (Btu/hr) 13,410,541.25

Area (ft2) 13,653.28

Cost of Condenser 331,260.89$

Cooling Water Necessary (kgal/hr) 253.37

Compressor Duty (kW)

Cost of Compressor ($2010)

Refrigeration Summary

Reactor Diamter (ft) 20

Reactor Lenggth (ft) 40.98

Reactor Pressure (psig) 314.6959488

Tube Outer Diameter (in) 1.25

Number of Tubes per Reactor 9552.367547

Shell Wall Thickness (in) 4.056950235

Weight of Steel Required (lbm) 791,106.70

Cost of Stainless Steel ($2010/lbm) 3.32$

Cost of Reactor ($2010) 2,626,556.57$

Number of Reactors In Parallel 43

Cost of Reactor System ($/2010) 112,941,932.69$

Volume of Catalyst (ft3) 276392.4086

Cost of Catlyst ($/lbm) 10

Catalyst every 4 years (lbm) 13803691.51

Cost of Catalyst every 4 years ($2010) 138036915.1

Cost of Catalyst per year ($/year) 34509228.77

Cooling Water Flow Rate (kgal/hr) 1619.605829

Reactor Summary

Page 77: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

77

Table 35. Syngas Unit Process Control Summary Table

Table 36. Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Control Summary Table

Table 37. Distillation Control Summary Table

Expected Disturbance Controlled Variable Manipulated Variable Manipulated Variable Response Type of Valve Fail Safe Alarms

Low inlet temperature Temperature of Inlet Stream Fired Heater Fuel Gas Flow Turn on Fired Heater PI Control Fail Close

High Inlet Temperature Temperature of Inlet Stream Oxygen Flow Rate Decrease Oxygen Flow PI Control Fail Close

Low Operating Temperature Operating Temperature Oxygen Flow Rate Increase Oxygen Flow PI Control Fail Close

High Internal Temperature Operating Temperature Oxygen Flow Rate Decrease Oxygen Flow PI Control Fail Close

H2 to CO ratio below 2 H2 to CO Ratio Carbon Dioxide Flow Rate Decrease Carbon Dioxide Feed PI Control Fail Close

H2 to CO ratio above 2 H2 to CO Ratio Carbon Dioxide Flow Rate Increase Carbon Dioxide Feed PI Control Fail Close

Low Conversion Operating Temperature Oxygen Flow Rate Increase Oxygen Flow PI Control Fail Close

High Conversion Operating Temperature Oxygen Flow Rate Decrease Oxygen Flow PI Control Fail Close

High Pressure Operating Pressure Inlet Flow Rate Open Pressure Release On-Off Control Fail Open High Pressure Alarm

Synthesis Gas Unit Control

Expected Disturbance Controlled Variable Manipulated Variable Manipulated Variable Response Type of Valve Fail Safe Alarms

Low Reactor Temperature Reactor Temperature Shell Side Pressure Increase Shell Side Pressure PI Control Fail Open

High Reactor Temperature Reactor Temperature Shell Side Pressure Decrease Shell Side Pressure PI Control Fail Open

Low Cooling Water Temperature Reactor Temperature Shell Side Pressure Increase Shell Side Pressure PI Control Fail Open

High Cooling Water Temperature Reactor Temperature Shell Side Pressure Decrease Shell Side Pressure PI Control Fail Open

Low Conversion Reactor Temperature Shell Side Pressure Increase Shell Side Pressure PI Control Fail Open

High Conversion Reactor Temperature Shell Side Pressure Decrease Shell Side Pressure PI Control Fail Open

High Feed Temperature Feed Temperature Medium Steam Condensate Flow Rate Increase Steam Condensate Flow Rate PI Control Fail Open

Low Feed Temperature Feed Temperature Medium Steam Condensate Flow Rate Decrease Steam Condensate Flow Rate PI Control Fail Open

High Pressure Reactor Pressure Inlet Flow Rate Open Pressure Release On-Off Control Fail Open High Pressure Alarm

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor Control

Expected Disturbance Controlled Variable Manipulated Variable Manipulated Variable Response Type of Valve Fail Safe Alarms

Low Reboiler Temperature Reboiler Temperature Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate Increase Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate PI Control Fail Close

High Reboiler Temperature Reboiler Temperature Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate Decrease Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate PI Control Fail Close

High Cooling Water Temperature Condenser Temperature Cooling Water Flow Rate Increase Cooling Water Flow Rate PI Control Fail Open

Low Cooling Water Temperatuer Condenser Temperature Cooling Water Flow Rate Decrease Cooling Water Flow Rate PI Control Fail Open

High liquid Level Liquid Level Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate Increase Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate PI Control Fail Close Flood Alarm

Low Liquid Level Liquid Level Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate Decrease Steam or Fuel Gas Flow Rate On-Off Control Fail Close Flood Alarm

Distillation Column Control Control

Page 78: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

78

Table 38. Flash Drum Control Summary Table

Figure 9. Sensitivity Analysis of the Plant

Expected Disturbance Controlled Variable Manipulated Variable Manipulated Variable Response Type of Valve Fail Safe Alarms

High Inlet Temperature Flash Drum Temperature Cooling Flow Rate Increase Cooling Flow Rate PI Control Fail Open

Low Inlet Temperature Flash Drum Temperature Cooling Flow Rate Decrease Cooling Flow Rate PI Control Fail Open

High Pressure Flash Drum Pressure Inlet Flow Rate Open Pressure Release On-Off Control Fail Open High Pressure Alarm

Flash Drum Control Control

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%

100.00%

120.00%

50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 120% 130% 140% 150%

DC

FRR

(%

)

Percent Change in Price (%)

Sensitivity Analysis

Raw Materials

Utilities

Fixed Capital

Products

Page 79: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

79

Appendix A.4 – Computer Simulation Outputs

Synthesis Gas Unit MATLAB Design Function

function SynGasDesign

clc

function Tinput = T Tinput = 1950; %F end

function Tpre1 = Tpre Tpre1 = 1000; %F end

function Pinput1 = P Pinput1 = 314.6959488; %psia end

function WtoCH4ratio1 = WtoCH4ratio WtoCH4ratio1 = 0.5; end

%Calculation of Enthalpies from NIST function h = H(i,T) Th = ((T-32)*(5/9)+273.15)/1000;

% [CH4 (298-1300) H2O(500-1700) O2(700-2000) CO2(1200-6000) CO(298-

1300) H2(1000-2500) N2(500-2000)] A = [ -0.703029 30.092000 30.032350 24.997350

25.567590 33.0661780 19.505830 ]; B = [ 108.47730 6.8325140 8.7729720 55.186960

6.0961300 -11.363417 19.887050 ]; C = [ -42.52157 6.7934350 -3.988133 -33.69137

4.0546560 11.4328160 -8.598535 ]; D = [ 5.8627880 -2.534480 0.7883130 7.9483870 -

2.671301 -2.7728740 1.3697840 ]; E = [ 0.6785650 0.0821390 -0.741599 -0.136638

0.1310210 -0.1585580 0.5276010 ]; F = [ -76.84376 -250.8810 -11.32468 -403.6075 -

118.0089 -9.9807970 -4.935202 ]; G = [ 158.71630 223.39670 236.16630 228.24310

227.36650 172.707974 212.39000 ]; H = [ -74.87310 -241.8264 0.0000000 -393.5224 -

110.5271 0.00000000 0.0000000 ];

h = (A(i)*Th+(B(i)*Th^2)/2+(C(i)*Th^3)/3+(D(i)*Th^4)/4-E(i)/Th+F(i)-

H(i))*0.94805*453.59237; %BTU/lbmol end

%Heats of Formation from NIST function f = Hf(i)

Page 80: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

80

% [ CH4 H2O O2 CO2 CO H2 N2 ] f1 = [ -74.87 -241.83 0 -393.5224 -110.5271 0 0 ]; f = f1(i); end

function c = Cp100(i) % [ CH4 H2O O2 CO2 CO H2

N2 ] c1 = [ 80.49370 44.41339 35.84960 56.79109 34.40867

31.22951 33.96532]; c = c1(i); end

function F = equationsolve(x)

% function x1 = x(i) % x2 = [43400.4031864778 11498.370384958 -6801.2208055209

24581.8491447255]; % x1 = x2(i); % end

%Intial Flow Rate of Methane R = 10.73159; %ft^3-psi/R-lbmol Tstand = 60+459.67; %R Pstand = 14.6959488; %psia CH4Feed = 500000000; %SCF/Day FCH4 = (Pstand*CH4Feed)/(R*Tstand); %lbmol/Day

%Reaction Kinetics from Reference 1 (Gas-To-Liquid) Ksyn = exp(30.53-4.85E4/T+2.42E6/T^2+2.49E9/T^3); Kwater = exp(-2.93+3.61E3/T+5.04E6/T^2+1.82E9/T^3); H2toCOratio = 2; %Desired Hydrogen to CO ratio

%Heat of Reaction Calculation Tref = 298.15; %K Tk = (T-32)*(5/9)+273.15; %K Hrxn1input = 226.1; %kJ/gmol from Reference 1 Hrxn2ref = (Hf(5)+2*Hf(2))-(Hf(1)+(3/2)*Hf(3)); %kJ/gmol Hrxn2input = Hrxn2ref+((Cp100(1)+(3/2)*Cp100(3))*(Tref-

Tk)+(Cp100(5)+2*Cp100(2))*(Tk-Tref))/1000; %kJ/gmol Hrxn3input = -41; %kJ/gmol from Reference 1

Hrxn1 = Hrxn1input*0.94805*453.59237; %Btu/lbmol Hrxn2 = Hrxn2input*0.94805*453.59237; %Btu/lbmol Hrxn3 = Hrxn3input*0.94805*453.59237; %Btu/lbmol

%Inlet Flow Rates FCH4in = FCH4/24 %lbmol/hr FH2Oin = WtoCH4ratio*FCH4in %lbmol/hr FO2in = (3/2)*x(2) %lbmol/hr FCO2in = x(4) %lbmol/hr FCOin = 0; %lbmol/hr FH2in = 0; %lbmol/hr FN2in = (FO2in/0.99)*0.01; %lbmol/hr Ftotalin = FCH4in+FH2Oin+FO2in+FCO2in+FCOin+FH2in+FN2in; %lbmol/hr

Page 81: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

81

%Outlet Flow Rates FCH4out = FCH4in-x(1)-x(2) %lbmol/hr FH2Oout = FH2Oin+2*x(2)-x(1)-x(3) %lbmol/hr FO2out = 0; %lbmol/hr FCO2out = FCO2in+x(3) %lbmol/hr FCOout = x(1)+x(2)-x(3) %lbmol/hr FH2out = 3*x(1)+x(3) %lbmol/hr FN2out = FN2in %lbmol/hr Ftotalout = FCH4out+FH2Oout+FO2out+FCO2out+FCOout+FH2out+FN2out; %lbmol/hr

%Oulet mole fraction yCH4 = FCH4out/Ftotalout; yH2O = FH2Oout/Ftotalout; yO2 = FO2out/Ftotalout; yCO2 = FCO2out/Ftotalout; yCO = FCOout/Ftotalout; yH2 = FH2out/Ftotalout; yN2 = FN2out/Ftotalout; Sumy = yCH4+yH2O+yO2+yCO2+yCO+yH2+yN2;

%It is assumed that the second reaction goes to completion and there is no %oxygen remaining in the system

%Energy Balance Setup

Hin =

FCH4in*H(1,Tpre)+FH2Oin*H(2,Tpre)+FO2in*H(3,Tpre)+FCO2in*H(4,Tpre)+FCOin*H(5,

Tpre)+FH2in*H(6,Tpre)+FN2in*H(7,Tpre) %Btu/hr Hout =

FCH4out*H(1,T)+FH2Oout*H(2,T)+FO2out*H(3,T)+FCO2out*H(4,T)+FCOout*H(5,T)+FH2o

ut*H(6,T)+FN2out*H(7,T) %Btu/hr Hrxntotal = x(1)*Hrxn1+x(2)*Hrxn2+x(3)*Hrxn3 %Btu/hr

%Energy Balance eqn1 = Hin+Hrxntotal-Hout

%H2 to CO Ratio eqn2 = FH2out/FCOout-H2toCOratio

%Extent of Reaction 1 Trank = T+459.67; %R eqn3 = ((yCO*yH2^3)/(yCH4*yH2O))-Ksyn

%Extent of Reaction 3 eqn4 = (yH2*yCO2)/(yH2O*yCO)-Kwater

F = [eqn1; eqn2; eqn3; eqn4]

end

x0 = [43400.4; 11498.37; -6801.22; 24581.8];

options = optimset('Display','iter','TolX',1E-6,'MaxIter',4000);

Page 82: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

82

[x,fval,exitflag] = fsolve(@equationsolve, x0, options)

%Oxygen Balance OxygenBalance = FH2Oin+FO2in*2+FCO2in*2+FCOin-

(FH2Oout+FO2out*2+FCO2out*2+FCOout)

%Carbon Balance CarbonBalance = FCH4in+FCO2in+FCOin-(FCH4out+FCO2out+FCOout)

end

Page 83: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

83

Synthesis Gas Unit MATLAB Design Output

FCH4in =

54899.0304437681

FH2Oin =

27449.5152218841

FO2in =

16300.7992377292

FCO2in =

17784.6908452316

FCH4out =

277.523275520134

FH2Oout =

12769.5760933577

FCO2out =

10444.7212809684

FCOout =

61961.4767325112

FH2out =

123922.953465022

FN2out =

164.654537754841

Hin =

1109755700.2328

Hout =

3012849499.00076

Hrxntotal =

1903093795.463

eqn1 =

-3.30496740341187

eqn2 =

4.44089209850063e-016

eqn3 =

-1.9077166371062e-006

eqn4 =

4.15068710513111e-008

F =

-3.30496740341187

4.44089209850063e-016

Page 84: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

84

-1.9077166371062e-006

4.15068710513111e-008

14 75 8.36554e-017 0.000567478 2.6e-008

3.81e+003

Optimization terminated: first-order optimality is less than options.TolFun.

x =

43754.3076764285

10867.1994918195

-7339.96956426318

17784.690580219

fval =

0

4.44089209850063e-016

9.14633346837945e-009

5.10702591327572e-015

exitflag =

1

OxygenBalance =

2.91038304567337e-011

CarbonBalance =

1.45519152283669e-011

Page 85: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

85

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor MATLAB Design Function

function FTRDesignFinal

clc

function Tinput = T Tinput = 425; %F end

function Pinput2 = P0 Pinput = 314.6959488; %psia Pinput2 = Pinput*0.068045964; %atm end

function NTinput = NT NTinput = 410000; %Number of Tubes end

function Twinput = Twater Twinput = 405.1; %F end

[W Z] = ode15s(@eqn,[0 14],[0 1 T]);

%Calculation of Heat Capacities from NIST function c = Cp(i2,T) TCp = ((T-32)*(5/9)+273.15)/1000;

% [CH4(298-1300) H2O(500-1700) CO2(298-1200) CO(298-1300) H2(298-

1000) N2(100-500)] A = [ -0.703029 30.092000 24.997350 25.567590

33.0661780 28.986410 ]; B = [ 108.47730 6.8325140 55.186960 6.0961300 -

11.363417 1.8539780 ]; C = [ -42.52157 6.7934350 -33.69137 4.0546560

11.4328160 -9.647459 ]; D = [ 5.8627880 -2.534480 7.9483870 -2.671301 -

2.7728740 16.635370 ]; E = [ 0.6785650 0.0821390 -0.136638 0.1310210 -

0.1585580 0.0001170 ]; F = [ -76.84376 -250.8810 -403.6075 -118.0089 -

9.9807970 -8.671914 ]; G = [ 158.71630 223.39670 228.24310 227.36650

172.707974 226.41680 ]; H = [ -74.87310 -241.8264 -393.5224 -110.5271

0.00000000 0.0000000 ];

c =

(A(i2)+B(i2)*TCp+C(i2)*TCp^2+D(i2)*TCp^3+(E(i2)/(TCp^2)))*(453.59237*(9/5)/10

55.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F end

%Calculation of Hydrocarbon Heat Capacities (CpC) %BTU/lbmol-F function b = CpC(i3) %Note: These Cp values are for 500K

Page 86: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

86

if i3 >= 11 b = (34.780167*i3+8.622333)*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); elseif i3 == 1 b = 46.63*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 2 b = 77.94*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 3 b = 112.59*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 4 b = 148.66*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 5 b = 182.39*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 6 b = 217.28*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 7 b = 252.09*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 8 b = 286.81*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 9 b = 321.54*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F elseif i3 == 10 b = 356.43*(453.59237*(9/5)/1055.05585); %BTU/lbmol-F end end

function Scorr2 = Scorr(T) Tk = (T-32)*(5/9)+273.15; T4 = exp(250*(1/Tk-1/473)); T3 = exp(-10000*(1/Tk-1/473)); alpha = 0.93*T4; v(1) = 0.03*T3; v(2:4) = 0.04*0.03*T3; for i = 5:1:60 v(i) = (1-alpha)*alpha^(i-1); end Scorr2 = 1/sum(v); end

function S2 = S(n,T) Tk = (T-32)*(5/9)+273.15; T4 = exp(250*(1/Tk-1/473)); T3 = exp(-10000*(1/Tk-1/473)); alpha = 0.93*T4; if n >= 5 S2 = ((1-alpha)*alpha^(n-1))/n*Scorr(T); elseif n >= 2 S2 = (0.04*0.03*T3)/n*Scorr(T); elseif n == 1 S2 = (0.03*T3)/n*Scorr(T); end end

for i10 = 1:1:60 Scheck(i10) = (S(i10,T))*i10; end

Page 87: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

87

Scheck = sum(Scheck)

function dz = eqn(w,z)

T1 = exp(-4492*(1/((z(3)-32)*5/9+273.15)-1/473)); T2 = exp(8237*(1/((z(3)-32)*5/9+273.15)-1/473)); T3 = exp(-10000*(1/((z(3)-32)*5/9+273.15)-1/473));

%Inital Flow Rates

FCH4 = 277.523275520134; %lbmol/hr FH2O = 12769.5760933577; %lbmol/hr FCO2 = 10444.7212809684; %lbmol/hr FCO = 61961.4767325112; %lbmol/hr FH2 = 123922.953465022; %lbmol/hr FN2 = 164.654537754841; %lbmol/hr Ftotalin = FCH4+FH2O+FCO+FH2+FCO2+FN2; %Total molar flow (lbmol/hr)

ThetaCH4 = FCH4/FCO; ThetaH2O = FH2O/FCO; ThetaCO = FCO/FCO; ThetaH2 = FH2/FCO; ThetaCO2 = FCO2/FCO; ThetaN2 = FN2/FCO;

%Densities from ASPEN rhoCH4 = 9.307358; %kg/m^3 rhoH2O = 10.45173; %kg/m^3 rhoCO2 = 25.5327; %kg/m^3 rhoCO = 16.25228; %kg/m^3 rhoH2 = 1.169532; %kg/m^3 rhoN2 = 16.25228; %kg/m^3 rhogas

=((FCH4*rhoCH4+FH2O*rhoH2O+FCO2*rhoCO2+FCO*rhoCO+FH2*rhoH2+FN2*rhoN2)/Ftotali

n)*(2.20462262/(3.2808399^3)); %lbm/ft^3

%Viscosities from ASPEN muCH4 = 0.0166811; %cP muH2O = 0.0169866; %cP muCO2 = 0.232632; %cP muCO = 0.025402; %cP muH2 = 0.0124972; %cP muN2 = 0.0254666; %cP mugas =

((FCH4*muCH4+FH2O*muH2O+FCO2*muCO2+FCO*muCO+FH2*muH2+FN2*muN2)/Ftotalin)*0.00

1*((3600*2.20462262)/3.2808399); %lbm/ft-hr

%Molecular Weights from NIST MWCH4 = 16.0425; %lbm/lbmol MWH2O = 18.0153; %lbm/lbmol MWCO2 = 44.0095; %lbm/lbmol MWCO = 28.0101; %lbm/lbmol MWH2 = 2.01588; %lbm/lbmol MWN2 = 28.0134; %lbm/lbmol

Page 88: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

88

MWgas =

(FCH4*MWCH4+FH2O*MWH2O+FCO2*MWCO2+FCO*MWCO+FH2*MWH2+FN2*MWN2)/Ftotalin;

%lbm/lbmol

%Delta Calculation for h = 1:60 g(h) = (1+1/h-(2+1))*S(h,z(3))*h; end delta = sum(g); yCO = FCO/Ftotalin; epsilon = yCO*delta; PCO0 = yCO*P0; %atm

StoichH2 = 2; %Depending on Source, 2 or (11/5)

FCOTube = FCO/NT; %lbmol/hr

phi = 0.4; %Void Fraction rhobulk = 0.8*62.428; %Catalyst Bulk Density (lbm/ft^3) rhocat = rhobulk/(1-phi); %Catalyst Density (lbm/ft^3) Doinput = 1.25; %Outter Tube Diamter (inches) Do = Doinput/12; %ft Do2 = Doinput*2.54; %cm Diinput = 1.12; %Inner Tube Diamter (inches) Di = Diinput/12; %ft

Ac = (pi/4)*Di^2; %cross-sectional area of one tube (ft^2) G = (Ftotalin*MWgas)/(Ac*NT*phi); %superficial mass velocity of

thru one tube (lbm/ft^2-h) G2 = G*(453.59237/(30.4862^2)); %g/hr-cm^2

gc = 32.174*3600^2; %Gravitational Constant (lbm-ft/h^2-lbf) Dp = (1/16)/12; %Particle Diameter (ft) k = 0.0173*(453.59237/(453.59237*0.8)); %lbmolCO/hr-lbmcat-atm^2 k2 = 4.512; %atm^-1

Hrxn = 70200; %BTU/lbmolCO a = 4/Do; %Heat exchange per unit volume of reactor (ft^-1)

B0 = (G*(1-phi)/(rhogas*gc*Dp*phi^3))*(150*(1-phi)*mugas/Dp+1.75*G);

%lbf/ft^3 B02 = B0*(1/(144*14.7)); %atm/ft alpha = 2*B02/(Ac*rhocat*(1-phi)*P0); %1/lbm PCO = PCO0*((ThetaCO-z(1))/(1+epsilon*z(1)))*z(2); %atm PH2 = PCO0*(ThetaH2-StoichH2*z(1))/(1+epsilon*z(2)); %atm rCO = k*T1*PH2*PCO/(1+k2*T2*PCO)^2; %lbmolCO/hr-lbmcat

Uo = (0.385*G2^0.8)/Do2^0.2; %BTU/ft^2-hr-F

%ODE45 Differential Equations %z(1) = Conversion %z(2) = Percentage of Pressure Drop %z(3) = Temperature dz = zeros(3,1); dz(1) = (rCO*NT)/FCO; %1/lbmcat

Page 89: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

89

dz(2) = -alpha/(2*z(2))*(1+epsilon*z(1))*z(3)/((T-

273.15)*9/5+32)*1.5; %1/lbmcat

SumFCp =

((FCOTube*((ThetaCH4+S(1,z(3))*z(1))*Cp(1,z(3))+(ThetaH2O+z(1))*Cp(2,z(3))+(1

-z(1))*Cp(4,z(3))+... (ThetaH2-

2*z(1))*Cp(5,z(3))+ThetaCO2*Cp(3,z(3))+ThetaN2*Cp(6,z(3))+...

S(2,z(3))*CpC(2)*z(1)+S(3,z(3))*CpC(3)*z(1)+S(4,z(3))*CpC(4)*z(1)+S(5,z(3))*C

pC(5)*z(1)+S(6,z(3))*CpC(6)*z(1)+...

S(7,z(3))*CpC(7)*z(1)+S(8,z(3))*CpC(8)*z(1)+S(9,z(3))*CpC(9)*z(1)+S(10,z(3))*

CpC(10)*z(1)+S(11,z(3))*CpC(1)*z(1)+...

S(12,z(3))*CpC(12)*z(1)+S(13,z(3))*CpC(13)*z(1)+S(14,z(3))*CpC(14)*z(1)+S(15,

z(3))*CpC(15)*z(1)+S(16,z(3))*CpC(16)*z(1)+...

S(17,z(3))*CpC(17)*z(1)+S(18,z(3))*CpC(18)*z(1)+S(19,z(3))*CpC(19)*z(1)+S(20,

z(3))*CpC(20)*z(1)+S(21,z(3))*CpC(21)*z(1)+...

S(22,z(3))*CpC(22)*z(1)+S(23,z(3))*CpC(23)*z(1)+S(24,z(3))*CpC(24)*z(1)+S(25,

z(3))*CpC(25)*z(1)+S(26,z(3))*CpC(26)*z(1)+...

S(27,z(3))*CpC(27)*z(1)+S(28,z(3))*CpC(28)*z(1)+S(29,z(3))*CpC(29)*z(1)+S(30,

z(3))*CpC(30)*z(1)+S(31,z(3))*CpC(31)*z(1)+...

S(32,z(3))*CpC(32)*z(1)+S(33,z(3))*CpC(33)*z(1)+S(34,z(3))*CpC(34)*z(1)+S(35,

z(3))*CpC(35)*z(1)+S(36,z(3))*CpC(36)*z(1)+...

S(37,z(3))*CpC(37)*z(1)+S(38,z(3))*CpC(38)*z(1)+S(39,z(3))*CpC(39)*z(1)+S(40,

z(3))*CpC(40)*z(1)+S(41,z(3))*CpC(41)*z(1)+...

S(42,z(3))*CpC(42)*z(1)+S(43,z(3))*CpC(43)*z(1)+S(44,z(3))*CpC(44)*z(1)+S(45,

z(3))*CpC(45)*z(1)+S(46,z(3))*CpC(46)*z(1)+...

S(47,z(3))*CpC(47)*z(1)+S(48,z(3))*CpC(48)*z(1)+S(49,z(3))*CpC(49)*z(1)+S(50,

z(3))*CpC(50)*z(1)+S(51,z(3))*CpC(51)*z(1)+...

S(52,z(3))*CpC(52)*z(1)+S(53,z(3))*CpC(53)*z(1)+S(54,z(3))*CpC(54)*z(1)+S(55,

z(3))*CpC(55)*z(1)+S(56,z(3))*CpC(56)*z(1)+...

S(57,z(3))*CpC(57)*z(1)+S(58,z(3))*CpC(58)*z(1)+S(59,z(3))*CpC(59)*z(1)+S(60,

z(3))*CpC(60)*z(1))));

dz(3) = ((Uo*a)/rhobulk*(Twater-z(3))+rCO*Hrxn)/SumFCp; %1/lbmcat end

figure(1) plot(W,Z(:,1),'b') xlabel('Weight of Catalyst (lbm)') ylabel('Percent of Conversion (%)') title('Conversion vs. Catalyst Weight') legend('Conversion (%)')

figure(2)

Page 90: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

90

plot(W,Z(:,2),'r') xlabel('Weight of Catalyst (lbm)') ylabel('Percent of Pressure (%)') title('Pressure Drop vs. Catalyst Weight') legend('Pressure Drop (%)')

figure(3) plot(W,Z(:,3),'g') xlabel('Weight of Catalyst (lbm)') ylabel('Temperature (°F)') title('Temperature vs. Catalyst Weight') legend('Temperature (°F)')

weight = W(:); conv = Z(:,1); FCOexit = FCO*(1-conv); %Flow Rate of CO (lbmol/hr) FH2exit = FH2-FCO*StoichH2*conv; %Flow Rate of H2 (lbmol/hr) FH2Oexit = FH2O+FCO*conv; %Flow Rate of H2O (lbmol/hr)

figure(4) plot(weight,FCOexit,'b',weight,FH2exit,'r',weight,FH2Oexit,'g') xlabel('Weight of Catalyst (lbm)') ylabel('Molar Flow Rate (lbmol/hr)') title('Molar Flow Rate vs. Catalyst Weight') legend('Carbon Monoxide','Hydrogen','Water')

%Exiting Conditions CatalystperTube = W(end) %lbm Conversion = Z(end,1) PDrop = (1-Z(end,2))*P0*14.695949%psia TotalCatalystWeight = CatalystperTube*NT; %lbm Temperature = Z(end,3) %F Pressure = Z(end,2)*P0*14.695949 %psia;

%Reactor Design CTP = 0.93; %For a One Tube Pass CL = 0.87; %For a 30-60 Equilateral Tri Pitch PT = Do+(1/12); %3inches inbetween tubes with an inch spacing (ft) Ds = 20; %Shell Diamter (ft) A1 = CL*PT^2; %ft^2 TubesperReactor = CTP*(pi*Ds^2)/(4*A1) RequiredLength = CatalystperTube/rhobulk/Ac %ft ReactorsParallel = NT/TubesperReactor ReactorsSeries = RequiredLength/60

HeatTransArea = NT*RequiredLength*2*pi*(Do/2) %ft^2 LMTD = (T-Twater) %F Q = Uo*HeatTransArea*LMTD %Btu/hr HvapH2O = 821.453; %BTU/lbm CoolingWater = Q/HvapH2O %lbm/hr

%Exiting Flow Rates Methaneout = FCO*S(1,T)*Z(end,1) %lbmol/hr H2Oout = FCO*(ThetaH2O+Z(end,1)) %lbmol/hr

Page 91: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

91

CO2out = FCO*(ThetaCO2) %lbmol/hr COout = FCO*(1-Z(end,1)) %lbmol/hr H2out = FCO*(ThetaH2-2*Z(end,1)) %lbmol/hr N2out = FCO*(ThetaN2) %lbmol/hr Ethaneout = FCO*S(2,T)*Z(end,1) %lbmol/hr Propaneout = FCO*S(3,T)*Z(end,1) %lbmol/hr Butaneout = FCO*S(4,T)*Z(end,1) %lbmol/hr Naphthaout = FCO*(S(5,T)+S(6,T)+S(7,T)+S(8,T)+S(9,T)+S(10,T))*Z(end,1);

%lbmol/hr Naphthabreak = [FCO*S(5,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(6,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(7,T)*Z(end,1)

FCO*S(8,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(9,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(10,T)*Z(end,1)] %lbmol/hr Dieselout =

FCO*(S(11,T)+S(12,T)+S(13,T)+S(14,T)+S(15,T)+S(16,T)+S(17,T)+S(18,T)+S(19,T)+

S(20,T))*Z(end,1); %lbmol/hr Dieselbreak = [FCO*S(11,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(12,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(13,T)*Z(end,1)

FCO*S(14,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(15,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(16,T)*Z(end,1)... FCO*S(17,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(18,T)*Z(end,1) FCO*S(19,T)*Z(end,1)

FCO*S(20,T)*Z(end,1)] %lbmol/hr Waxout =

FCO*(S(21,T)+S(22,T)+S(23,T)+S(24,T)+S(25,T)+S(26,T)+S(27,T)+S(28,T)+S(29,T)+

S(30,T)+S(31,T)+S(32,T)+...

S(33,T)+S(34,T)+S(35,T)+S(36,T)+S(37,T)+S(38,T)+S(39,T)+S(40,T)+S(41,T)+S(42,

T)+S(43,T)+S(44,T)+S(45,T)+S(46,T)+...

S(47,T)+S(48,T)+S(49,T)+S(50,T)+S(51,T)+S(52,T)+S(53,T)+S(54,T)+S(55,T)+S(56,

T)+S(57,T)+S(58,T)+S(59,T)+S(60,T))*Z(end,1); %lbmol/hr C21_25 = FCO*(S(21,T)+S(22,T)+S(23,T)+S(24,T)+S(25,T)) %lbmol/hr C26_29 = FCO*(S(26,T)+S(27,T)+S(28,T)+S(29,T)) %lbmol/hr C30_35 = FCO*(S(30,T)+S(31,T)+S(32,T)+S(33,T)+S(34,T)+S(35,T)) %lbmol/hr C36_47 =

FCO*(S(36,T)+S(37,T)+S(38,T)+S(39,T)+S(40,T)+S(41,T)+S(42,T)+S(43,T)+S(44,T)+

S(45,T)+S(46,T)+S(47,T)) %lbmol/hr C47plus =

FCO*(S(48,T)+S(49,T)+S(50,T)+S(51,T)+S(52,T)+S(53,T)+S(54,T)+S(55,T)+S(56,T)+

S(57,T)+S(58,T)+S(59,T)+S(60,T))*Z(end,1) %lbmol/hr

%Carbon Balance for i1 = 1:60 CarbonOut(i1) = FCO*S(i1,T)*Z(end,1)*i1; end

CarbonBalance = FCO-(sum(CarbonOut)+COout); CarbonBalancePercent = CarbonBalance/FCO*100

end

Page 92: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

92

Fischer-Tropsch Reactor MATLAB Design Function

Scheck =

0.999999999999999

CatalystperTube =

14

Conversion =

0.909737058557914

PDrop =

49.2864790016159

Temperature =

408.493586202037

Pressure =

265.409475022285

TubesperReactor =

9552.3675474669

RequiredLength =

40.972757411597

ReactorsParallel =

42.921296522842

ReactorsSeries =

0.682879290193283

HeatTransArea =

5497404.43848456

LMTD =

19.9

Q =

9504481354.07364

CoolingWater =

11570328.8612661

Methaneout =

4918.69638501423

H2Oout =

69138.2276798971

CO2out =

10444.7212809684

COout =

5592.82514597183

H2out =

11185.6502919433

N2out =

164.654537754841

Ethaneout =

98.3739277002845

Propaneout =

65.5826184668564

Butaneout =

49.1869638501423

Naphthabreak =

Columns 1 through 5

Page 93: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

93

903.312630623071 686.289450785425

536.3039801511 427.828349886977 346.710922525941

Column 6

284.485751419763

Dieselbreak =

Columns 1 through 5

235.786166056751 197.05172739996

165.832109974795 140.389436105665 119.459775080001

Columns 6 through 10

102.104164419589 87.6122842094676

75.4383022632208 65.1570325012516 56.4332924050259

C21_25 =

208.583960967908

C26_29 =

91.2247745637791

C30_35 =

73.8309007924141

C36_47 =

53.4343525987551

C47plus =

12.793340144485

CarbonBalancePercent =

1.17427117587818e-014

Page 94: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

94

Appendix A.5 – Supporting Graphs

Figure 10. Syngas Temperature Optimization

Figure 11. Syngas Water to Methane Ratio Optimization

$38,000.00

$38,200.00

$38,400.00

$38,600.00

$38,800.00

$39,000.00

$39,200.00

$39,400.00

$39,600.00

$39,800.00

$40,000.00

$40,200.00

1780 1800 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960

Op

era

tin

g C

ost

s p

er

year

($

/ye

ar)

Syngas Operating Temperature (F)

Syngas Operating Costs vs. Temperature

Total ($/hr)

$39,000.00

$40,000.00

$41,000.00

$42,000.00

$43,000.00

$44,000.00

$45,000.00

$46,000.00

$47,000.00

0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1

Op

era

tin

g C

ost

s p

er

year

($

/ye

ar)

Water to Methane Ratio

Syngas Operating Costs vs. Water to Methane Ratio

Total ($/hr)

Page 95: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

95

Figure 12. Reactor Temperature Optimization

Figure 13. Reactor Cost Optimization

$1,740.00

$1,760.00

$1,780.00

$1,800.00

$1,820.00

$1,840.00

$1,860.00

$1,880.00

$1,900.00

$1,920.00

380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460

Re

ven

ue

pe

r ye

ar (

$/y

ear

)

Mill

ion

s

Reactor Operating Temperatuer (F)

Revenue per Year vs. Reactor Temperature

Revenue per Year

$-

$20.00

$40.00

$60.00

$80.00

$100.00

$120.00

$140.00

$160.00

380 390 400 410 420 430 440 450 460

Re

acto

r C

ost

s p

er

year

($

/ye

ar) M

illio

ns

Reactor Temperature (F)

Cost of Reactor ($/year)

Cost of Reactor ($/year)

Page 96: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

96

Table 39. Syngas Flow Rates for Temperature Optimization

Table 40. Syngas Cost Optimization for Temperature Optimization

Table 41. Syngas Flow Rates for Water to Methane Ratio Optimization

1800 54,899.03 27,449.52 16,664.50 24,705.53 1,402.95 14,004.82 17,983.18 60,218.43 120,436.86

1850 54,899.03 27,449.52 16,652.00 21,773.50 805.23 13,589.00 14,843.00 61,023.70 122,047.00

1900 54,899.03 27,449.52 16,513.60 19,526.00 468.24 13,180.50 12,392.00 61,565.30 123,130.60

1950 54,899.03 27,449.52 16,300.80 17,784.70 277.52 12,769.60 10,444.72 61,961.50 123,922.95

Syngas Temperature Optimization Flow Rates

FCOout

(lbmol/hr)

FH2out

(lbmol/hr)

FH2Oout

(lbmol/hr)

FCO2out

(lbmol/hr)

FCH4out

(lbmol/hr)T (°F)

FCH4in

(lbmol/hr)

FO2in

(lbmol/hr)

FH2Oin

(lbmol/hr)

FCO2in

(lbmol/hr)

1800 2,472.56$ 33,701.02$ 3,750.15$ 39,923.72$

1850 2,472.56$ 33,675.74$ 3,305.08$ 39,453.38$

1900 2,472.56$ 33,395.85$ 2,963.93$ 38,832.33$

1950 2,472.56$ 32,965.50$ 2,699.61$ 38,137.67$

Syngas Temperature Optimization

FH2Oin ($/hr) FO2in ($/hr) FCO2in ($/hr) Total ($/hr)T (°F)

0.5 54,899.03 27,449.52 16,664.50 24,705.53 1,402.95 14,004.82 17,983.18 60,218.43 120,436.86

0.6 54,899.03 32,939.40 16,357.00 31,211.78 978.70 18,802.00 24,143.00 60,989.00 121,978.00

0.7 54,899.03 38,429.00 15,977.80 37,733.00 727.20 23,618.00 30,327.00 61,577.00 123,154.00

0.8 54,899.03 43,919.00 15,561.00 44,262.00 563.00 28,445.00 36,525.00 62,072.00 124,144.00

0.9 54,899.03 49,409.00 15,125.00 50,796.00 450.97 33,277.00 42,730.00 62,514.00 125,028.00

1 54,899.03 54,899.00 14,675.00 57,332.00 369.00 38,112.00 48,939.00 62,922.00 125,845.00

1.1 54,899.03 60,388.90 14,216.00 63,871.00 308.00 42,950.00 55,151.00 63,309.00 126,619.00

1.2 54,899.03 65,878.80 13,752.70 70,410.00 261.00 47,790.50 61,366.00 63,682.00 127,364.00

1.3 54,899.03 71,368.00 13,284.00 76,950.00 224.00 52,631.00 67,582.00 64,043.00 128,087.00

1.4 54,899.03 76,858.00 12,812.00 83,492.00 194.00 57,472.00 73,799.00 64,397.00 128,794.00

1.5 54,899.03 82,348.00 12,339.00 90,033.00 170.00 62,314.00 80,016.00 64,745.00 129,490.00

FH2out

(lbmol/hr)

FCOout

(lbmol/hr)

FCO2out

(lbmol/hr)

FCH4in

(lbmol/hr)

FO2in

(lbmol/hr)

FCO2in

(lbmol/hr)

Syngas Water to Methane ratio Optimization Flow Rates

WtoCH4

FH2Oin

(lbmol/hr)

FCH4out

(lbmol/hr)

FH2Oout

(lbmol/hr)

Page 97: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

97

Table 42. Syngas Costs for Water to Methane Ratio Optimization

0.5 2,472.56$ 33,701.02$ 3,750.15$ 39,923.72$

0.6 2,967.07$ 33,079.16$ 4,737.76$ 40,783.98$

0.7 3,461.55$ 32,312.29$ 5,727.64$ 41,501.48$

0.8 3,956.07$ 31,469.39$ 6,718.70$ 42,144.15$

0.9 4,450.59$ 30,587.65$ 7,710.52$ 42,748.76$

1 4,945.11$ 29,677.61$ 8,702.64$ 43,325.36$

1.1 5,439.62$ 28,749.36$ 9,695.22$ 43,884.20$

1.2 5,934.13$ 27,812.42$ 10,687.80$ 44,434.35$

1.3 6,428.58$ 26,864.55$ 11,680.53$ 44,973.67$

1.4 6,923.10$ 25,910.02$ 12,673.57$ 45,506.69$

Syngas Water to Methane ratio Optimization

WtoCH4 FH2Oin ($/hr) FO2in ($/hr) FCO2in ($/hr) Total ($/hr)

Page 98: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

98

Table 43. Material Balance for Syngas and FTR

Species

To Preheater

(lbmol/hr)

To Syngas Unit

(lbmol/hr)

To FTR

(lbmol/hr)

To Separations

(lbmol/hr)

Methane (CH4) 54,899.03 54,899.03 277.52 4,918.70

Water 27,449.52 27,449.52 12,769.58 69,138.23

Oxygen 16,300.80 16,300.80 - -

Carbon Dioxide 17,784.69 17,784.69 10,444.72 10,444.72

Carbon Monoxide - - 61,961.48 5,592.83

Hydrogen - - 123,922.95 11,185.65

Nitrogen 164.65 164.65 164.65 164.65

Ethane (C2H6) - - - 105.11

Propane (C3H8) - - - 70.07

n-Butane (C4H10) - - - 52.56

n-Pentane (C5H12) - - - 193.04

n-Hexane (C6H14) - - - 733.29

n-Heptane (C7H16) - - - 573.04

n-Octane (C8H18) - - - 457.13

n-Nonane (C9H20) - - - 370.46

n-Decane (C10H22) - - - 303.97

n-Undecane (C11H24) - - - 251.94

n-Dodecane (C12H26) - - - 210.55

n-Tridecane (C13H28) - - - 177.19

n-Tetradecane (C14H30) - - - 150.00

n-Pentadecane (C15H32) - - - 127.64

n-Hexadecane (C16H34) - - - 109.10

n-Heptadecane (C17H36) - - - 93.61

n-Octadecane (C18H38) - - - 80.61

n-Nonadecane (C19H40) - - - 69.62

n-Icosane (C20H42) - - - 60.30

C21 - - - 52.36

C22 - - - 45.56

C23 - - - 39.73

C24 - - - 34.72

C25 - - - 30.38

C26 - - - 26.64

C27 - - - 23.38

C28 - - - 20.56

C29 - - - 18.10

C30 - - - 15.95

Page 99: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

99

Table 44. Material Balance for Syngas and FTR 2

Species

To Preheater

(lbmol/hr)

To Syngas Unit

(lbmol/hr)

To FTR

(lbmol/hr)

To Separations

(lbmol/hr)

C31 - - - 14.07

C32 - - - 12.43

C33 - - - 10.99

C34 - - - 9.72

C35 - - - 8.61

C36 - - - 7.63

C37 - - - 6.77

C38 - - - 6.01

C39 - - - 5.34

C40 - - - 4.75

C41 - - - 4.22

C42 - - - 3.76

C43 - - - 3.35

C44 - - - 2.98

C45 - - - 2.66

C46 - - - 2.37

C47 - - - 2.11

C48 - - - 1.89

C49 - - - 1.69

C50 - - - 1.51

C51 - - - 1.35

C52 - - - 1.20

C53 - - - 1.08

C54 - - - 0.96

C55 - - - 0.86

C56 - - - 0.77

C57 - - - 0.69

C58 - - - 0.62

C59 - - - 0.56

C60 - - - 0.50

Total (lbmol/hr) 116,598.69 116,598.69 209,540.91 106,062.80

Carbon Balance 72,683.72 72,683.72 72,683.72 72,069.32

Oxygen Balance 95,620.49 95,620.49 95,620.50 95,620.50

Page 100: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

100

Figure 14. Graph of Conversion vs. Catalyst Weight in a Single Tube

Figure 15. Graph of Percent of Pressure Drop vs. Weight of Catalyst

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

Weight of Catalyst (lbm)

Perc

ent

of

Convers

ion (

%)

Conversion vs. Catalyst Weight

Conversion (%)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140.84

0.86

0.88

0.9

0.92

0.94

0.96

0.98

1

1.02

Weight of Catalyst (lbm)

Perc

ent

of

Pre

ssure

(%

)

Pressure Drop vs. Catalyst Weight

Pressure Drop (%)

Page 101: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

101

Figure 16. Graph of Temperature vs. Catalyst Weight of a Single Tube

Figure 17. Graph of Molar Flow Rates of Carbon Monoxide, Hydrogen, and Water vs. Catalyst Weight in a

Single Tube

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14405

410

415

420

425

430

435

440

Weight of Catalyst (lbm)

Tem

pera

ture

(°F

)Temperature vs. Catalyst Weight

Temperature (°F)

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 140

2

4

6

8

10

12

14x 10

4

Weight of Catalyst (lbm)

Mola

r F

low

Rate

(lb

mol/hr)

Molar Flow Rate vs. Catalyst Weight

Carbon Monoxide

Hydrogen

Water

Page 102: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

102

Appendix A.6 – Sample Calculations

Equation 1. Steam Reforming Equilibrium Kinetics

[

]

Equation 2. Water-Gas Shift Reaction Equilibrium Kinetics

[

]

Where,

T = Temperature in degrees Fahrenheit

Equation 3. Anderson-Shulz-Flory (ASF) equation

[

( )

]

Or

( )

Where,

α = ASF Chain Growth Parameter

Wn = Relative Weight Fraction of Carbon Number n

Mn = Relative mol fraction of carbon number n

( )

[ (

)]

Where,

T = Reactor Temperature, in Kelvin

Equation 4. Selectivity of Methane

( )

Equation 5. Selectivity of Ethane, Propane, and Butane

( )

( )

[ (

)]

Where,

T = Reactor Temperature, in Kelvin

Page 103: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

103

Equation 6. Design Equation for a Packed-Bed Reactor

Where, FCO = Carbon monoxide Molar Flow Rate

Equation 7. Fischer-Tropsch Rate Equation

( )

( )

( )

( )

( )

Where,

k = 0.0173 gmolCO/hr-cm3catalyst-atm

2

k2 = 4.512 atm-1

X = Conversion

PH2 = Partial Pressure of Hydrogen

PCO = Partial Pressure of Carbon Monoxide

PCO0 = Intial Pressure of Carbon Monoxide

y = Percentage of Pressure Drop

yCO0 = Initial Partial Pressure of Carbon Monoxide

δ = Total Change in Moles

Equation 8. Ergun Equation to Model Pressure Drop in Packed-Bed Reactors

( )

( )

( )

[ ( )

]

Where,

T = Temperature

T0 = Initial Temperature

Φ = Porosity

gc = 32.174 lbm-ft/s2-lbf

G = Superficial Mass Velocity

Ac = Cross-Sectional Area

Page 104: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

104

Dp = Diameter of Particle in Bed

ρc = Density of Catalyst

μ = Viscosity of Gas

Equation 9. Temperature Gradient Calculation

( )

Where,

Uo = Overall Temperature Coefficient

ρb = Density of bed

Ta = Ambient Temperature

D = Tube Diameter

G = Inlet Gas Mass Velocity

Equation 10. Thickness for Cylindrical Shells

Equation 11. Thickness for Torispherical Heads

Equation 12. Volume of a Torispherical Head

(

)

Where,

P = Pressure of the Vessel

S = Maximum Allowable Working Stress

ri = Inside Radius of Shell Before Corrosion Allowance

Cc = Corrosion Allowance

OD = Outside Diameter of Shell

a = 2 for thicknesses less than 0.0254m and 3 for thicknesses greater than 0.0254m

La = Inside Radius of Head

Equation 13. Cost of Steel for a Pressure Vessel

( ) ( )

Where,

Wv = Weight of Steel

Page 105: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

105

Equation 14. Maximum Vapor Velocity for a Flash Drum

[

]

Where,

ρL = Liquid Density

ρV = Vapor Density

k = 0.35

Equation 15. Number of Tubes in a Shell

Where,

Nt = Number of Tubes

CTP = 0.93 for One Tube Pass

CL = 0.87 for 30&60 Equilateral Triangular Pitch

PT = Tube Pitch

Ds = Diameter of Shell

Depreciation

Future Value

( )∑( )

Present Value

( )

Net Present Value

( )

Page 106: Plant Process Design and Economic Analysis - TerpConnect€¦ ·  · 2017-04-20Material and Energy Balance Discussion ... liquid plant to convert 500 MSCF/Day of natural gas to diesel

106

Revenue

( )( )

Gross Profit

Net Profit

( )

Cash Flow

Borrowed Working Capital

( )( )

∑( )

Return on Investment

Cash Flow Payback Period

Inflation

[ ( ) ( ) ]( )

Where,

dj = Depreciation

φ = Tax Rate

s = Revenue

c = Manufacturing Costs

j = Year Number

i = Inflation Rate