plato nominalism and patents
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
PLI – PATENT LITIGATION
PLATO, NOMINALISM AND PATENTS
Brad Lyerlawww.marshallip.com
![Page 6: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PRINCIPAL CRITICS -- NOMINALISTS
• “Chair” is just a name.• There is nothing that corresponds to “chairness.”
It is just about how language works.• Plato is a realist. He thinks “chairness” really
exists.• Nominalists think “chairness” does not exist; its
just language.• Plato – metaphysics. Nominalists – linguistics.
![Page 8: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
When we resolve an ambiguity, we have a choice. We can focus on the
invention or we can focus on the words.
![Page 9: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
INVENTION — ADVANTAGES
● Emphasize Technology.● Claim Scope Co-Extensive
with Invention.● Intuitive to Non-Lawyer
Public.● Legitimacy.
![Page 10: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
INVENTION — DISADVANTAGES
• Difficult To Do.• May Not Serve Public
Notice Function.• May ignore Johnson & Johnson (disclosed but not claimed subject matter).
![Page 11: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
WORDS — ADVANTAGES
• Not About Technology.• About a Legal Document.• Public Notice.• Avoid “Reading In”
Limitations.
![Page 12: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
WORDS — DISADVANTAGES
• Disconnected from theInventor’s Contribution.
• Empowers “Patent Trolls.”• Erodes Credibility of Patents.
![Page 13: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
INVENTION — HOW ONE BEHAVES
• Wide-Open Process.• All Probative Evidence.• No Bias Favoring Certain
Types of Evidence.
![Page 14: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
WORDS — HOW ONE BEHAVES
• Tools of a Linguist.• Dictionaries.• Formal Rules of Construction.• Hierarchical. [e.g., UCC § 2-202]
![Page 15: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
PHILLIPS v. AWH CORPORATION
• Baffles – Only Acute or Oblique Angles in Disclosure.
• Defendant’s Baffles Perpendicular.• Trial Court – No Infringement.• Federal Circuit – Affirmed on Different Analysis.• En Banc – Covers Perpendicular Baffles.• Invention or Words?
![Page 16: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
PHILLIPS CREATES A HYBRID• Preference for Invention: “The
patent system is based on theproposition that claims cover onlythe invented subject matter.”
• Texas Digital rejected.• Adopts some tools of a Linguist.
Hierarchical Probativity. Claim Differentiation.
![Page 17: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
WHAT DOES PHILLIPSMEAN BY “INVENTION”
• Not the claims.• The inventor’s contribution to the art.• To discern the contribution, look at the
written disclosure.
![Page 18: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
CONCLUSIONS
• Rejects ideological purity.• Genius of common law method
to reject ideology in favor of what works.
![Page 19: Plato Nominalism And Patents](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022052400/55a1e3291a28ab7d508b4584/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Thank You
Brad Lyerla is a trial lawyer and a partner at Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP. He graduated from the University of Illinois in 1976 where he was elected to Phi Beta Kappa. He obtained his law degree from the University of Illinois College of Law in 1980. He was a member and editor of the Law Review.He is listed in Who’s Who in America, Who’s Who in American Law, America’s Leading Lawyers and Illinois Super Lawyers, among others. He is a Life Fellow of the American Bar Foundation and is a recipient of the John Powers Crowley Justice Award for Pro Bono trial work.He has tried cases for such well-known companies as AM International, Quaker Oats, General Dynamics, MCI, Solo Cup Company, Chris-Craft Industries and US Robotics among many others. Most of his trial work is in trade secret and patent infringement lawsuits.
For further information contact Mr. Lyerla at:[email protected](312) 474-9556