playing the bull market’s final inning(s)...12 june 1, 2012 1.47 1278.04 stock market up: 29.5 %...
TRANSCRIPT
Playing The Bull Market’s Final Inning(s)
Douglas Ramsey, CFA, CMTMid-September 2013
FOR PROFESSIONAL USE ONLY. FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OF THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT PRIOR PERMISSION.
2
This report is not a solicitation or offer to buy or sell securities. The Leuthold Group, LLC provides research to institutional investors. It is also a registered investment advisor that uses its own research, along with other data, in making investment decisions for its managed accounts. As a result, The Leuthold Group, LLC may have executed transactions for its managed accounts in securities mentioned prior to this publication. The information contained in The Leuthold Group, LLC research is not, without additional data and analysis, sufficient to form the basis of an investment decision regarding any one security. The research reflects The Leuthold Group, LLC’s views as of the date of publication, which are subject to change without notice. The Leuthold Group, LLC does not undertake to give notice of any change in its views regarding a particular industry prior to publication of their next research report covering that industry in the normal course of business. The Leuthold Group, LLC may make investment decisions for its managed accounts that are inconsistent with, or contrary to, the views expressed in current Leuthold Group, LLC reports. Weeden Investors, L.P., Weeden & Co., L.P.'s parent company, owns 22% of Leuthold Group’s securities. A Managing Director of Weeden & Co., L.P. is a member of The Leuthold Group, LLC board of directors. Weeden & Co., L.P. member FINRA, NASDAQ, and SIPC.
Disclosures
3
MTI is mildly bullish Net
ReadingIntrinsic Value -215
Economic/Interest Rates/Inflation -7
Attitudinal -146
Supply/Demand 75
Momentum/Breadth/Divergence +435
Ratio of Positive to Negative Points: 1.12
Above 1.05 = BullishBetween 0.95 and 1.05 = NeutralBelow 0.95 = Bearish
Major Trend Index
4
It’s not exactly been a “global”bull market
2010 2011 2012 2013
850
900
950
10001050110011501200
13501400145015001550160016501700175018001850
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700© 2013 The Leuthold Group
United States(S&P 500)
ForeignDeveloped Markets(MSCI World Ex USA)
EmergingMarkets
(MSCI)
5
“The tape” is mostly in gear…
S&P 500 bull market highJuly 22, 2013
2010 2011 2012 2013
30000
35000
40000
x10
1000
150
200
250
600
700800900
1000
350
400
450
500
4000
5000
6000
3500
4000
45005000
1500
Dow JonesTransports
Russell 2000
S&P 500
Dow Jones Utilities
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
S&P 500Financials
Morgan Stanley Cyclical Index
NYSEAdvance/Decline
Line
Dow Jones 65Composite
6
Tape is in gear (cont.)
Market Early Warning Signals: Prior S&P 500 Tops Vs. Today
Subse- Dow 65 Dow Dow Russell S&P 500 MS NYSE TotalDate of quent Composite Transports Utilities 2000 Financials Cyclical A/D Line Number ofBull Market High Decline Warning? Warning? Warning? Warning? Warning? Warning? Warning? Warnings*
July 16, 1990 -19.9 % 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7July 17, 1998 -19.3 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 5March 24, 2000 -49.1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 6October 9, 2007 -56.8 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7
Average: 6.3
Important Highs, March 2009 To DateApril 23, 2010 -16.0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1April 29, 2011 -19.4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1August 2, 2013 -4.6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1
*A warning is issued when an index fails to "confirm" a new S&P 500 bull market price high during the preceding 21 trading days (one month). © 2013 The Leuthold Group
Usually most of these internal market measures will deteriorate beforethe final bull market peak is achieved. But at the August 2nd high,
just one of these seven leading measures (DJ Utilities) had raised a warning flag.
7
Two longer-term warning signs…
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
3600
3700
3800
3900
4000
4100
4200
4300
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500160017001800© 2013 The Leuthold Group
S&P 500
NYSE WeeklyAdvance/Decline Line
The NYSE WeeklyAdvance/Decline Line generally
acts stronger than its daily counterpartthroughout a bull market. But the weekly
version now looks weaker, and hasn'tmade a new high since mid-May.
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130
1
2
3
4
5
6
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
160017001800© 2013 The Leuthold Group
S&P 500
NYSE High/LowLogic Index*(10-Wk. Avg.)
NYSE new 52-week highs and lows are both at
elevated levels, a sign that market
strength is notas uniform as
indicated by most other measures.
Below 1% - Tape is "in gear"- BULLISH
Above 5% - Tape is "divergent"- BEARISH
Index calculated as the lesser of NYSE Weekly New Highs and New Lows as a percentage of issues traded.
8
A possible sign of “distribution”?
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-130
-120
-110
-100
-90
-80
-70
-60
155160165170175180185190195
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
150160170180
SPDR S&P 500ETF Trust
(SPY)
Morning hype haslately been giving way to
afternoon weakness… a sign the smartmoney may be "distributing" stock.
SPDR Cumulative Opening Price Change(The "Emotional Money")
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
SPDR Cumulative Intraday Price Change(The "Smart Money")
9
Rates and stocks prices can rise together
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
100
200
300400500
700900
1200150019002400
12
34
75
6 98
10 11 12
Stocks & Interest Rates Can SometimesGo Up Together
U.S. 10-Yr. Treasury Bond Yield(weekly close)
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
S&P 500
10
Rising rates/ rising stock prices (cont.)
S&P 50010-Yr. P/E on 5-Yr.Bond Stock Market/ Normalized
Dates Yield S&P 500 Bond Yield Action © 2013 The Leuthold Group EPS1 May 2, 1958 2.89 43.69 Stock Market Up: 38.5 % 15.1
July 31, 1959 4.41 60.51 Bond Yields Up: 152 Basis Points
2 January 11, 1963 3.80 64.85 Stock Market Up: 44.7 % 21.0February 11, 1966 4.86 93.81 Bond Yields Up: 106 Basis Points
3 January 27, 1967 4.47 86.16 Stock Market Up: 25.8 % 21.2November 29, 1968 5.78 108.37 Bond Yields Up: 131 Basis Points
4 November 5, 1971 5.72 94.46 Stock Market Up: 26.8 % 15.2January 5, 1973 6.42 119.73 Bond Yields Up: 70 Basis Points
5 March 3, 1978 8.04 87.04 Stock Market Up: 60.1 % 11.3November 28, 1980 12.72 139.33 Bond Yields Up: 468 Basis Points
6 November 5, 1982 10.48 143.02 Stock Market Up: 19.1 % 8.8July 22, 1983 11.43 170.35 Bond Yields Up: 95 Basis Points
7 April 18, 1986 7.09 242.42 Stock Market Up: 38.9 % 16.5August 21, 1987 8.77 336.77 Bond Yields Up: 168 Basis Points
8 January 19, 1996 5.54 612.79 Stock Market Up: 8.0 % 24.6June 7, 1996 6.93 662.06 Bond Yields Up: 139 Basis Points
9 October 2, 1998 4.31 1002.60 Stock Market Up: 46.1 % 27.8January 14, 2000 6.69 1465.15 Bond Yields Up: 238 Basis Points
10 June 13, 2003 3.13 988.61 Stock Market Up: 34.1 % 23.0May 5, 2006 5.12 1325.76 Bond Yields Up: 199 Basis Points
11 March 20, 2009 2.65 768.54 Stock Market Up: 53.3 % 11.3April 2, 2010 3.96 1178.10 Bond Yields Up: 131 Basis Points
12 June 1, 2012 1.47 1278.04 Stock Market Up: 29.5 % 18.6September 6, 2013 (To 2.94 1655.17 Bond Yields Up: 147 Basis Points
Average Stock Market Gain (Excl. 2012-13): 35.4 % 17.9Median Stock Market Gain (Excl. 2012-13): 36.3 % 17.6
Average Bond Yield Increase (Excl. 2012-13): 170 Basis PointsMedian Bond Yield Increase (Excl. 2012-13): 143 Basis Points
11
Bull markets have frequently topped near current valuations
S&P 500 Normalized
Date Of S&P 500 P/E At BullBull Market Peak Market PeakDecember 31, 1961 22.3 x
February 28, 1966 23.0November 29, 1968 20.6January 31, 1973 20.8September 29, 1976 13.6November 29, 1980 11.3August 31, 1987 22.3 "Normal"July 31, 1990 18.4 S&P 500July 31, 1998 27.7 Bull MarketMarch 31, 2000 32.1 HighOctober 31, 2007 20.9
Median At Modern Era Bull Market Peaks (1957 To Date) 20.9 x 1695
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
1957 To DateAt Bull Market Peaks,
S&P 500 Normalized P/E
.ec
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1957-to-DateMedian = 18.6x
1926-to-DateMedian = 16.6x
S&P 500 P/E On 5-Yr. Normalized EPS(1926 To Date - Monthly)
© 2013 The Leuthold GroupGreat Depression earnings wipeout
August 30, 2013 = 20.1x(76th percentile
since 1926)
12
Profit margins have probably peaked for this business cycle…
1947 1951 1954 1957 1961 1964 1967 1970 1974 1977 1980 1983 1987 1990 1993 1996 2000 2003 2006 2009 2013 201
4.04.55.05.56.06.57.07.58.08.59.09.5
10.010.5U.S. Corporate Profits As A Percent Of GDP
[from National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA);Profits are after tax and Include inventory valuation allowanceand capital consumption adjustment]
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
65-Yr. Median = 6.0%
5.5%
4.7%
10.3%
8.6%
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
10.1%(2Q)
13
Implications of high margins…
. 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008 2012 2016 2
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
10.0
9.5
9.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
7.0
6.5
6.0
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.0
1952 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Margins Are An Excellent (But Unfortunately Inverse) Predictor Of
Future Profit GrowthConcept courtesy of Hussman Research & Insight.
© 2013 The Leuthold Group5-Yr. Annualized Growth In NIPA Corporate Profits
(scale at left)
NIPACorporate ProfitsAs A Pct.Of GDP - advanced five years
and shown on invertedscale (right)
Today's profit margins are so inflated thatsubstantially slower profit growth over the next three to five years is almost baked in the cake.
14
The bond bull has been a big driver of margin gains..
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 01011 13 14 152
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
198019601950© 2013 The Leuthold Group
1990 2000 20101970
Moody's BAA Corporate Bond Yield(quarterly average - left scale) best
case
likelypath
Net Interest Expense As APct Of Earnings Before Interest
And Taxes (EBIT)(right scale)
How The Bond Bull Boosted Earnings...
15
“Bookkeepers”have also helped boost margins…
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 01011 13 14 15
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
198019601950 1990 2000 20101970
How Bookkeepers Have Boosted Earnings...
Top Marginal Corporate Tax Rate
47 49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 01011 13 14 15
50
100
150
200
50
100
150
200
Effective Corporate Tax Rate As APercentage Of Statutory Rate
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
19.9%(2Q)
57%(2Q)
66-Yr. Median = 80%
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
Corporate Income Taxes As APercent Of Pretax Corporate Profits
(Effective Tax Rate)
16
Virtually all margin improvement has been “below” the line…
NIPA Income Statement 1997:Q3 2013:Q2Earnings Before Interest & Taxes As Pct. Of "Sales" (i.e., GDP) 15.1% 15.3%Net Interest Payments Pct Sales 4.8% 2.7%Corporate Income Taxes Pct Sales 2.9% 2.5%Net Corporate Profit Margin 7.3% 10.1%© 2013 The Leuthold Group
Margin Expansion:From The Late 1990s Profitability Peak To Today
17
On the positive side, EBIT margins have room to move higher…
1947 1951 1954 1957 1961 1964 1967 1970 1974 1977 1980 1983 1987 1990 1993 1996 2000 2003 2006 2009 2013 201
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18Earnings Before Interest And Taxes (EBIT)As A Percent Of GDP
1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
66-Yr. Median = 13.7%11.9%
16.4%
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
15.3%(2Q)
From National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA);Profits include inventory valuation allowance and capital consumption adjustment.
16.7%
15.1%
12.2%
18
Breadth of earnings gains has narrowed dramatically in last year…
1990 2000 2010
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
Percent OfCompanies With Rising
Year-Over-YearEarnings*
6 yrs. of strongearnings breadth
4+ yrs. Ofstrong earnings
breadth
2 yrs. ofstrong
earningsbreadth
*Based on tabulation of all earnings reports published inInvestor's Business Daily.
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
60% =recessionalert
19
Earnings breadth & the leadership “inversion”
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 201350
52
54
56
58
60
62
80
100
120
140
160
180
70
80
90
100
110
120
130
140
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
February 17, 2011:Peak in earnings breadth
Earnings Breadth & Stock Market Leadership
Percent OfCompanies With Rising
Year-Over-Year Earnings
Ratio,Russell 2000 to
S&P 500
Ratio,S&P 500
High Beta/Low Volatility
Index
Ratio,Morgan StanleyCyclical Index/
ConsumerIndex
20
Industry groups are enjoying “positive feedback”
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
250
300
350
400
450
500
550
600
650
700750800850900950
10001050
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
Ratio, Strong To Weak Global Industries(Relative price performance of top to bottom quintile of MSCI World Level III industry porfolios formed monthly on trailing 12-mo. price momentum.)
2009 bearmarket low
The stock market is in a "positive feedback" loop in
which winning industry themes tend to keep winning
over the short- to intermediate-term. This is
likely to continue on a relative basis until well into
the next bear market.
2002bear market
low
2011correction
low
21
Momentum strategies work best near the end of a bull market…
Stocks With Stocks WithDate Of Monthly High Price Low PriceBull Market High Momentum MomentumAugust 1929 68.3 20.1February 1937 34.6 18.6October 1938 8.1 10.3May 1946 61.1 31.4July 1956 24.4 11.2December 1961 27.3 19.7January 1966 33.9 4.3November 1968 22.9 23.8December 1972 23.7 6.5September 1976 26.1 26.6November 1980 76.2 15.9August 1987 30.0 39.8June 1990 19.3 1.8June 1998 35.3 19.5March 2000 38.7 3.7October 2007 25.6 8.7Average 34.7 % 16.4 %Number Of TimesWith Highest Return 12 4Monthly total returns for large-cap stocks based on Fama-French Momentum Portfolios, Tuck School of Business.Boxes highlight higher return in last year of bull market.
Last 12 Months Of Bull MarketsPerformance Of Price Momentum In
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
22
…And momentum even wins during bear markets!
Stocks With Stocks WithBear Market Dates High Price Low Price(Monthly) Momentum MomentumSep 1929 - Jun 1932 -77.3 -94.5Mar 1937 - Mar 1938 -51.2 -56.3Nov 1938 - Apr 1942 -24.2 -28.7Jun 1946 - Jun 1949 -16.0 -26.3Aug 1956 - Oct 1957 -12.6 -19.1Jan 1962 - Jun 1962 -21.5 -30.2Feb 1966 - Sep 1966 -11.4 -16.2Dec 1968 - Jun 1970 -31.3 -35.3Jan 1973 - Sep 1974 -39.8 -64.0Oct 1976 - Feb 1978 4.2 -20.7Dec 1980 - Jul 1982 -21.8 -13.2Sep 1987 - Nov 1987 -30.4 -19.3Jul 1990 - Oct 1990 -12.1 -31.9Jul 1998 - Aug 1998 -14.6 -17.8Apr 2000 - Sep 2002 -38.1 -56.4Nov 2007 - Feb 2002 -48.3 -68.8Average -27.9 % -37.4 %Median -21.8 -28.7Number Of TimesWith Highest Return 14 2Monthly total returns for large-cap stocks based on Fama-French Momentum Portfolios, Tuck School of Business.Boxes highlight better performer during bear market.
During Cyclical Bear MarketsPerformance Of Price Momentum
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
23
New bull markets see the “Revenge of the Nerds”
Stocks With Stocks WithDate Of High Price Low PriceBear Market Low Momentum MomentumJune 1932 100.4 % 287.7 %March 1938 25.1 62.4April 1942 66.6 61.1June 1949 40.9 38.3October 1957 31.9 31.6June 1962 38.1 26.9October 1966 39.7 34.2May 1970 39.6 64.3October 1974 37.7 52.4March 1978 27.5 18.5August 1982 66.3 64.1December 1987 20.5 32.5October 1990 37.6 74.0August 1998 43.4 49.2October 2002 14.9 51.1February 2009 35.5 116.7Average 41.6 % 66.6 %Number Of TimesWith Highest Return 7 9Monthly total returns for large-cap stocks based on Fama-French Momentum Portfolios, Tuck School of Business.Boxes highlight higher return in first year of bull market.
First Year Of New Bull MarketsPerformance Of Price Momentum In
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
24
Investors remain in love with yield, at a time it scarcely exists…
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 20101.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
Total Yield On A 60/40 Portfolio(60% S&P 500/40% 10-Yr. Treasurys)
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
1878-To-DateMedian =
4.15%
August 30, 2013 = 2.43%
25
A sober portfolio forecast…
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
10.5
11.0
11.5
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21Total Yield On A 60/40 Portfolio Vs. 10-Yr. Total Portfolio Return
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
Total Yield On 60/40 Portfolio
10-Yr. Trailing
Return On 60/40
Portfolio
Correlation Coefficient(1878 To Date) =
0.66
(advanced 10 yrs. - left scale)
(right scale)
1880 19101890 1900 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
26
The bipolar modern history of bonds…
1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Annualized Real Total Return,Jan26 - Sep81 = +0.01%
Annualized RealTotal Return,
Oct81 - Jan13 =+6.67%
U.S. 10-Yr. Treasury BondReal Total Return Index
(Cumulative Total Return Deflated By CPI)1926 To Date
Annualized RealTotal Return,
Jan26 - Jan13 =+2.38%
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
September 30, 1981 -the best date in U.S. historyto retire…
27
A simple way to forecast bond returns
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Current Bond Yields Have Historically Been An Excellent EstimateOf Bonds' 10-Yr.
Future Total Return Potential...
U.S. 10-Yr. Treasury Bond Yield,Advanced 10 Years
10-Yr. U.S. Treasury Bonds10-Yr. Annualized
Total Return
Correlation,January 1930 To Date =
0.96
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
28
Bond market symmetry!
940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 20
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
September 1981 yield peak =15.32%
The BondBull Market Has Essentially BeenThe Mirror ImageOf The Previous
Bear!
Sep41-Sep81:U.S. 10-Yr. Treasury
Bond Yield(mo. avg.)
Oct81-Sep21:"Mirror Image"of 1941-1981U.S. 10-Yr.
T-Bond Yield(mo. avg.)
To preserve its near-perfect symmetry with the preceding bear market, the secular bond bull begun in
September 1981 would need to last until July 2017.
Oct81-To-DateActual U.S. 10-Yr.
T-Bond Yield(mo. avg.)
Correlation Between Actual Yield and "Mirror Image" Forecast,October 1981 To Date =
0.92
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
29
30
A Simple, Single-Asset Annual Allocation Strategy:Invest Using Last Year's Performance Rank, 1973-2012
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Best P
erform
ing Ass
et
Second B
est
Third B
est
Fourth B
est
Fifth B
est
Sixth B
est
Worst Perf
orming A
sset
S&P 500
TOTAL
RETURN
(%)
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
31
BridesmaidAsset ClassOwned During
Year Year1973 -14.7 % Commodities 75.0 % 95.11974 -26.5 Gold 66.3 47.51975 37.2 Commodities -17.2 -33.11976 23.8 Large Caps 23.8 30.31977 -7.2 REITs 19.1 6.01978 6.6 Gold 37.0 21.71979 18.4 EAFE 6.2 25.21980 32.4 Small Caps 38.6 17.91981 -4.9 Large Caps -4.9 8.31982 21.4 Govt. Bonds 39.3 22.01983 22.5 REITs 25.5 29.91984 6.3 REITs 14.8 11.81985 32.2 REITs 5.9 18.11986 18.5 Large Caps 18.5 5.61987 5.2 Govt. Bonds -2.2 -10.81988 16.8 Commodities 27.9 30.01989 31.5 Commodities 38.3 31.61990 -3.2 Large Caps -3.2 4.71991 30.5 Govt. Bonds 18.8 10.81992 7.7 REITs 12.2 0.21993 10.0 REITs 18.5 20.01994 1.3 Small Caps -1.8 -6.41995 37.4 Commodities 20.3 21.71996 23.1 Small Caps 16.5 27.01997 33.4 Commodities -14.1 15.91998 28.6 Small Caps -2.5 24.01999 21.0 EAFE 27.4 19.42000 -9.1 EAFE -14.0 -24.32001 -11.9 REITs 15.5 13.52002 -22.1 Govt. Bonds 15.4 26.12003 28.7 Gold 20.9 12.42004 10.9 EAFE 20.7 22.62005 4.9 EAFE 14.0 5.02006 15.8 Gold 22.5 26.82007 5.5 EAFE 11.6 8.62008 -37.0 Gold 4.3 14.12009 26.5 Gold 26.5 24.02010 15.1 REITs 27.6 11.92011 2.1 REITs 7.3 -15.92012 16.0 Gold 5.9 16.32013 EAFE1973-2012, AnnualizedTotal Return: 9.8 % 15.6 % 14.2 %Std. Deviation: 18.1 % 19.0 % 20.2 %
No. Yrs Matching Or Exceeding S&P 500: 28/40 23/40Correlation With S&P 500 (Annual Returns): -0.11 -0.09© 2013 The Leuthold Group
Bridesmaid
Total ReturnS&P 500
Total ReturnAsset Class)
Year's Runner-Up(Own Previous
Strategy
(Using 12-Mo.Momentum)
BridesmaidStrategy
With MonthlyRebalancingBuy last year’s
“Bridesmaid” asset class!
2012
REITs (NAREIT Index) 20.1 %MSCI EAFE 17.9Russell 2000 16.4S&P 500 16.0Gold 5.910-Yr. U.S. Treasury Bonds 2.8Commodities (GSCI) 0.1
Total Return
32
BridesmaidSector Strategy With
Bridesmaid Monthly S&P 500 Bridesmaid Strategy Rebalancing
Total Sector (Last Year's Total (Using 12-Mo.Return Second Best Sector) Return Momentum)
1991 30.5 % Consumer Staples 41.7 % 45.71992 7.6 Financials 23.3 13.51993 10.1 Consumer Discretionary 14.6 19.21994 1.3 Industrials -2.4 1.41995 37.6 Health Care 58.0 82.81996 23.0 Financials 35.2 22.51997 33.4 Financials 48.2 58.11998 28.6 Health Care 43.9 35.31999 21.0 Telecom Services 19.1 19.12000 -9.1 Materials -15.7 -2.52001 -11.9 Health Care -11.9 -14.02002 -22.1 Consumer Discretionary -23.8 2.32003 28.7 Materials 38.2 20.42004 10.9 Materials 13.2 7.62005 4.9 Utilities 16.8 16.82006 15.8 Utilities 21.0 22.92007 5.5 Energy 34.4 7.22008 -37.0 Materials -45.7 -35.82009 26.5 Health Care 19.7 24.52010 15.1 Materials 22.2 23.82011 2.1 Industrials -0.6 3.02012 16.0 Consumer Staples 10.8 0.92013 Consumer Discretionary
1991-2012 Annaulized:Total Return 9.1 % 13.3 % 14.6 %Std. Deviation 18.7 % 25.3 % 24.5 %
No. Yrs. Outperforming S&P 500: 13/22 15/22Correlation With S&P 500 (Annual Returns): 0.94 0.86
Results assume annual rebalancing of S&P 500 sectors; numbers include dividends, but exclude transactions costs.
© 2013 The Leuthold Group
2012Total
S&P 500 Sectors ReturnFinancials 28.8 %Consumer Discretionary 24.1Telecom Services 18.3Health Care 17.9Industrials 15.3Materials 15.0Information Technology 14.8Consumer Staples 10.8Energy 4.6Utilities 1.3S&P 500 16.0 %
“Bridesmaid” has been a winning sector strategy, too