PLEASE RESPOND ELECTRONICALLY TO JULIANNA PIERRE 2ND FLOOR, 602-262-4544

To: Departments Concerned Date: February 19, 2020 From: Alan Stephenson

Planning & Development Department Director

Subject: P.H.O. APPLICATION NO. Z-116-78-1 – Notice of Pending Actions by the Planning Hearing Officer

1. Your attention is called to the fact that the Planning Hearing Officer will consider the

following case at its meeting on March 18, 2020. 2. Information about this case is available for review at the Planning and Development

Department on the 2nd Floor of Phoenix City Hall, telephone 602-262-7131, Option 6. 3. Please indicate your course of action, sign and return copy of this notice to the City of

Phoenix Planning and Development Department, Zoning Division, 200 West Washington Street 2nd Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003 by February 26, 2020.

Will arrange to review case file no later than Will resolve problems with the owner and contact you no later than We do not anticipate any problems in connection with the cases listed on this subject

notice. Signature Date DISTRIBUTION (Electronically): Mayor’s Office (Lisa Fernandez) - 11th Floor Council District Office (Penny Parrella) – 11th Floor Aviation (Randy Payne, Sheldon Daisley, Aviation Planning) – 2485 E. Buckeye Rd. Community & Economic Development (Eric Johnson) – 20th Floor Fire Prevention (Brent Allsopp) – 2nd Floor Finance Admin (Barry Page) – 251 W. Washington – 8th Floor Neighborhood Services (Gregory Gonzales) – 4th Floor Parks & Recreation (Natasha Hughes) – 16th Floor Public Transit (Kathryn Boris) – 302 N. 1st Ave., Ste 800 Public Transit/Light Rail Project (Samantha Keating/Special TOD Only) Public Works (Kristina Jensen, Roxanne Tapia, Ray Dovalina, Rudy Rangel) – 5th Floor Water Services (Don Reynolds) – 8th Floor Planning and Development (Alan Stephenson, Joshua Bednarek) – 3rd Floor Planning and Development/Information Services (Ben Ernyei) – 4th Floor Planning and Development (Kevin Weight) – Historic Preservation Office – 3rd Floor Planning Hearing Officer (Tricia Gomes, Adam Stranieri) – 2nd Floor Village Planner (Nick Klimek, North Mountain) Village Chair (Tyler Carrell, North Mountain)

200 W Washington Street, 2nd Floor * Phoenix, Arizona 85003 * Tel: (602) 262-7131 * Fax: (602) 495-3793

APPLICATION FOR PLANNING HEARING OFFICER ACTION

APPLICATION NO: PHO-1-20--Z-116-78-1

Council District: 1 Request For: Stipulation Modification Reason for Request: Deletion of the stipulation permitting a maximum of 80 units. Owner Applicant RepresentativeArizona Housing, Inc. Doug McCord Doug McCord209 West Jackson Street, Ste. 100 1055 East Indian School Road 1055 East Indian School RoadPhoenix AZ 85003 Phoenix AZ 85014 Phoenix AZ 85014(602) 418-4994 (602) 307-5399 P: (602) 307-5399 F: mholleran@azhousinginc.org dmccord@art-team.com dmccord@art-team.com Property Location: Northeast corner of 33rd Avenue and Cochise Drive

Zoning Map: K-6 Quarter Section: 28-21 APN: 149-15-135B Acreage: 2.43 Village: North Mountain

Last Hearing: CC HEARINGPrevious Opposition: No

Date of Original City Council Action: 07/10/1978 Previous PHO Actions:

Zoning Vested: R-4A Supplemental Map No.: 441

Planning Staff: 076885 An applicant may receive a clarification from the city of its interpretation or application of a statute, ordinance, code or authorizedsubstantive policy statement. To request clarification or to obtain further information on the application process and applicablereview time frames, please call 602-262-7131 (option 6), email zoning.mailbox@phoenix.gov or visit our website athttp://phoenix.gov/pdd/licensetimes.html. A Filing Fee had been paid to the City Treasurer to cover the cost of processing this application. The fee will be retained to coverthe cost whether or not the request is granted Fee Fee Waived Fee Date Receipt Purpose$1,080.00 $0.00 01/30/2020 20-0008794 Original Filing Fee Signature of Applicant: _____________________________________________________ DATE: ___________________

Hearing Results Planning Hearing Officer Planning Commission City Council

Date: 03/18/2020 1000 AM Date: Date:Appealed?: Appealed?:

Action: Action: Action:

P 1|1

Principals:

Doug McCord, AIA, LFA, LEEDap

Dev Pawar, AIA, EDAC, LFA, LEEDap

Erica Quintana

Architectural Resource Team, Inc. 1055 E Indian School Rd.

Phoenix, AZ 85014 V | 602.307.5399

www.art-team.com

Collins Court Phase 2 Addition 01.29.2020

PHO Narrative

Arizona Housing, Inc., a 501c3 non-profit organization, (AHI) is requesting PHO hearing to remove the stipulation imposed during the rezoning of the property in 1978.

STIPULATION

• …subject to the stipulation that a maximum of 80 units be constructed

Rationale: The removal of this stipulation will allow the addition of 36 affordable studio apartments to the existing 80-unit complex which already operates as a permanent affordable supportive housing facility under the oversight of the City of Phoenix Housing Department. The supportive services currently on the property has the capacity to serve additional residents.

The project has been through the pre-application process, been under design and extensive efforts have been made to procure funding for over 2 years. Not until a zoning confirmation letter for the ADOH Funding Application was submitted to the city did it become revealed that a 1978 stipulation existed limiting the number of units on the site to 80. The project at that time was an extended stay motel, and the hypothesis is that the stipulation was crafted for that specific project. The use as well as the profound community benefit has evolved 42 years later, and thus the applicant kindly requests the stipulation to be removed for this fact alone. Collins Court has never had any neighborhood concern regarding the current operations or future plans.

Arizona Housing, Inc. also notes that the City of Phoenix Housing Department is in favor of the proposed expansion.

Background on AHI

In late 2010, the City of Phoenix Housing Department provided funding to AHI to purchase a blighted foreclosed extended stay motel at 10421 North 33rd Avenue with federal funds to create 80 units of permanent affordable supportive housing in a long-term partnership with Arizona Housing, Inc., a non-profit organization. To AHI’s knowledge there was no disclosure of the 1978 stipulation provided during this transaction nor during subsequent work on the project.

In late 2012, after extensive renovations, the property was re-opened as Collins Court Apartments and has provided formerly homeless and/or disadvantaged individuals with a clean, safe and affordable place to call home. The tenants at Collins Court Apartments are unique in that their income must be at or below 50% of the Area Median Income as defined by HUD and the City of Phoenix Housing Department.

Arizona Housing, Inc., a 501c3 non-profit organization, has been in operation twenty-four hours a day, 365 days a year, since 1995 and currently owns and operates 533 permanent affordable supportive housing apartments in Phoenix, AZ.

N33

RDAV

E

W COCHISE DR

PRIVATE

N 32

ND LN

Maricopa County Assessor's Office

Planning & Development Department

PHO-1-20--Z-116-78-1 Property Location: Northeast corner of 33rd Avenue and Cochise Drive

0 100 20050 Feet ´

N33

RDAV

E

W COCHISE DR

PRIVATE

N 32

ND LN

PAD-14

R-4A

C-O

PSC

C-O

Planning & Development Department

PHO-1-20--Z-116-78-1 Property Location: Northeast corner of 33rd Avenue and Cochise Drive

0 100 20050 Feet ´

UP

UP

UPUP

UP

UP

UP

1

2

3

3

4 4 5

5

5 6

7

8

8

9

9

10101010

11 1112

13

14

1315

16

17

18

19

20

21

110.61'

N89°25'34"W

30.00'N89°25'34"W

30.00'

N89°25'34"W30.00'

N89°25'34"W34.47'

N89°55'34"W 510.40'(M)510.11'(R1)410.11'

6' ELECTRICAL EASEMENTDOCKET 14563, PAGE 1066

APN 139-15-135BSUBJECT PROPERTY

2 STORY BUILDING - 13 UNITS2 STORY BUILDING - 10 UNITS AND LAUNDRY FACILITY

2 STO

RY B

UILD

ING

-11 U

NITS

2ND STORY WALKWAY - CATWALK ABOVE SIDEWALK

2 STORY BUILDING - 4 UNITS2 STORY BUILDING - 12 UNITS2 STORY BUILDING - 12 UNITS

2ND STORY WALKWAY - CATWALK ABOVE SIDEWALK

N89°55'34"W 410.11'(M&R1&D1)

N00°

34'26

"E 1

58.20

'(M&D

)

N89°52'50"W 445.63'(M) 445.73'(D)

N01°

02'46

"W(M

) 15

8.22'(

M&D)

N89°

25'34

"W20

.19'

N00°

0 4' 26

" E3 0

. 0 0'

N00°

04'26

"E

30.00

'

3' HIGH BLOCKWALLON PROPERTY LINE

158.1

6 '

(M&R1)

6' HIGH BLOCKWALLON PROPERTY LINE

1' HIGH BLOCKWALL

SIGN

8'

8.0'

8'

LANDSCAPE AREA

LAND

SCAP

E AR

EA

2 STORY BUILDING - 12 UNITS

L.S. AREA 2ND

STOR

Y W

ALKW

AY -

CATW

ALK

ABOV

E SI

DEW

ALK

LANDSCAPE AREA

LANDSCAPE AREA

LAND

SCAP

E AR

EA

CONCRETEGARBAGE COLLECTION AREA

LAND

SCAP

E AR

EA

2 STO

RY B

UILD

ING

-6 U

NITS

AND

OFF

ICE

FIRS

T STO

RY W

ALKW

AY

FIRS

T STO

RY W

ALKW

AY

STAI

RWAY

TO 2N

D ST

ORY

STAI

RWAY

TO 2N

D ST

ORY

STAI

RWAY

TO 2N

D ST

ORY

LAND

SCAP

E AR

EA

CONC

RETE

SID

EWAL

K

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

41'

60.0'

R/W

VAR

IES

PER

BK.19

4, PG

.12, M

CR

STAI

RWAY

TO 2N

D ST

ORY

2ND STORY WALKWAY - CATWALK ABOVE SIDEWALK

2ND

STOR

Y W

ALKW

AY -C

ATW

ALK

ABOV

E SI

DEW

ALK

2ND STORY WALKWAY - CATWALK ABOVE SIDEWALK2ND STORY WALKWAY - CATWALK ABOVE SIDEWALK

1ST STORY WALKWAY

1ST STORY WALKWAY

1ST S

TORY

WAL

KWAY

1ST S

TORY

WAL

KWAY

2ND

STOR

Y W

ALKW

AY -

CATW

ALK

ABOV

E SI

DEW

ALK

GAS VALVE

6' HIGH BLOCK WALLON PROPERTY LINE

6' HIGH BLOCKWALLON PROPERTY LINE

6' HIGH BLOCK WALL

3'

LANDSCAPE AREA LANDSCAPE AREALANDSCAPE AREA

31'

4'

4.0'

CONC

RETE

SID

EWAL

K

CONCRETE SIDEWALK

4.3'4.2'

4.5'

4.5'

4.5'

4.5'4.5'

4.5'

6' HIGH METAL FENCEOVERHANG/CONCRETE PADUNDERNEATH

QWEST BOX

TRANSFORMER

6'

6'

4.5'

3'

4.5'

4.5'

STAI

RWAY

TO 2N

D ST

ORY

33RD

AVE

NUE

32N D

LAN E

COCHISE DRIVE

TRANSFORMER

7'

5'

GATE

STAI

RWAY

TO 2N

D ST

ORY

LANDSCAPE AREA BUSHES ALONG BUILDING BUSHES ALONG BUILDING BUSHES ALONG BUILDING

8'P.U.E.

8.0'P.U.E

7 1010 10

93.1'94.4'90.1'23.0'73.3'

20.1'

30' - 0"

30' - 0"

30' - 0"

30' - 0"

NEW APARTMENTS, 2-Story (~6,500SF)14 Units

NEW APARTMENTS, 2-Story (~7,500 SF)16 Units

NEW APARTMENTS, 2-Story (~3,000SF)6 Units

NEW COURTYARDW/ NEW AMENITIES

20' - 0"

15' - 0"

5 PARKING SPOTS (not Incl.)

18 PARKING SPOTS(not incl.)

8' - 6"

20' - 3"

4

2

13

8

6

57

12

10

911

16

14

131548' - 3"

R 4' - 0

"

EXIT ONLY

(N) THROUGH F.D. ACCESS MIN TYP25' - 0"

EXISTING COURTYARD W/ AMENITIES

IMAGINARY PROPERTY LINE

2222

23

24

6' - 3"

5' - 1"

25

Peoria Ave

Cochise Dr

33rd

AVE

ProjectSite

32nd

Lan

e

VICINITY MAP

PROJECT INFORMATIONCollins Court Phase 2 Addition10421 N 33rd AvePhoenix, AZ 85051

Arizona Housing Incorporated209 W Jackson, Ste 100Phoenix, AZ 85003Contact | Mark Holleran, CEO E | mholleran@azhousinginc.org

Architectural Resource Team, Inc99 E. Virginia, Ste 120Phoenix, AZ 85004V | 602.307.5399Contact: Doug McCord, AIA E | dmccord@art-team.com

2-Story woodframed multi-family affordable housing projecy, Type VA Construction addition to existing apartment building campus. Addition will accommodate 36 new affordable housing units for a total of 116 affordable units on site.

PROJECT:

OWNER REPRESENTATIVE:

APPLICANT:

PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

Total: 79,279 G.S.F. (1.82 ac)

APN 149-15-135B

R-4AR-4A

ALLOWED | PROPOSEDFour Stories, 48' | Two Stories, 28'

ALLOWED | PROPOSEDExisting - Type IIB, Not Sprinklered[16,000 + 75% increase for frontage]28,000 | 23,225 s.f

New - Type VA, Sprinklered 36,000 | 8,500 s.f.

ALLOWED | PROPOSEDEXISTING: 50% | 40%

ALLOWED | PROPOSED158 units | 116 units(R-4a: 1 du/500 sf of site)

BBQ, Gardening Area, Community Room, Courtyard x 2,Shaded Outdoor Seating Areas x 2

REQUIRED | PROPOSEDFront (West): 20' | 20'N Side: 5' | 45' minS Side: 5' | 10'Front (East): 20' | 20' min

REQUIRED: MF Housing = (116) units (<600 sf) x 1 = 116

Total: 116 (5 ADA Required)

PROVIDED: 37 Car Spaces (incl. 3 ADA) NO RESERVED PARKING

SITE AREA:

PARCEL NUMBERS:

EXISTING ZONING:PROPOSED ZONING:

BUILDING HEIGHT:

BUILDING AREA:PER FLOOR

LOT COVERAGE:

DWELLING UNIT DENSITY:

AMENITIES

SETBACKS/PERIMETER STANDARDS:

PARKING:

GENERAL ZONING ANALYSIS

DATE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

ART PROJECT NO.

DRAWING No.

DRAWING TITLE

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND THE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE TEAM, INC. THIS

DRAWING MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, OR REPRODUCTIONS HEREOF USED, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION

99 e. virginia ave, ste 120phoenix, az 85004602-307-5399 | v

www.art-team.com

KIV

A #

16-

3371

A1.1

Conceptual Site Plan- Phase 2

Ariz

ona

Hous

ing

Inco

rpor

ated

Collin

s Cou

rt Ph

ase

2 Ad

ditio

n

DMc

DMc30NOV2017

17016

Concept Design

1042

1 N

33r

d Av

ePh

oeni

x, A

Z 85

051

1" = 20'-0"1 Site - Phase 2 Concept

Keynote Legend1 AUTOMATIC SWINGING GATE WITH 20' CLR OPENING -

RESIDENT ENTRY ONLY BY SECURITY SYSTEM.2 EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURE3 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN GATE4 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN GATE5 EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT6 CIP CURB. MAINTAIN 20'-0" CLEAR FOR FIRE ACCESS7 EXISTING LIGHTED MONUMENT SIGN8 EXISTING FENCE WALL9 EXISTING LANDSCAPE10 ASPHALT PAVING11 ACCESSIBLE ROUTE STRIPING12 WHEEL STOP/CURB, TYPICAL13 FIRE LANE SIGNAGE14 ADA PARKING SIGN, TYPICAL15 6'-0" HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCING P7.16 CROSS HATCH INDICATES CONCRETE WALKS ON

GROUND FLOOR17 ACCESS PAD FOR AUTOMATIC GATE OPERATION18 CONCRETE SIDEWALK19 EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCING AND 3'-0"

PEDESTRIAN GATE WITH SECURE ENTRY20 EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED IN THIS AREA OF

COURTYARD21 PIPE BOLLARD, TYP.22 EXISTING DUAL ADA RAMP23 NEW SIDEWALK CONNECTION24 NEW P1255-1 DRIVE25 NEW GATE, EXIT ONLY. TRAFFIC ACTIVATED.

Site Plan Notes: 1. Development and use of this site will conform with all applicable codesand ordinances. 2. All new or relocated utilities will be placed underground.3. Structures and landscapeing within a triangle measured 10' back fromthe property line and 20' along the property line on each side of the driveways' entrances will be maintained at a maximum height of 3'4. Structures and landscapeing within a triangle measuring 33'x33' alongthe property lines will be maintained at a maximum height ot 3'.5. All signage requires separate approvals and permits. No signs areapproved per this plan. 6. Any lighting will be placed so as to direct light away from the adjacentresidential districts and will not exceed one foot candle at the property line. No noise, odor or vibration will be emitted so that it exceeds the general level of noise, odor or vibration emitted by uses outside of the site. 7. Owners of property ajacent to public right-of-way will have theresponisibility for maintaining all landscaping within the rights-of-way in accordance with approved plans.8. All rooftop equipment and satellite dishes shall be screened to theheight of the tallest equipment.9. Barbed, razor, or concertina wire (or similar) shall not be used on thissite where visible from public streets or adjacent residential areas.

Date _____07/12/2017_____________________

I consent to the reproduction of this site plan for the purpose of future amendments provided that if modifications are made, the Architects who make such changes assume full responsibility and liability for the plan.

_______________________________Signature of copyright ownerPrinted name of copyright owner: Doug McCord

PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION (PER TITLE REPORT)

THAT PORTION OF TRACT C, METRO PLAZA, ACCORDING TO BOOK 194 OF MAPS, PAGE 12, RECORDS OF MARICOPACOUNTY, ARIZONA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

BEGINNING AT THE WESTERLY MOST SOUTHWEST COMER OF SAID TRACT C;THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES 00 MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST (RECORD NORTH), ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAIDTRACT C, A DISTANCE OF 158.20 FEET TO A POINT WHICH INTERSECTS AN EXISTING MASONRY WALL;

THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 26 MINUTES 31 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID MASONRY WALL, ADISTANCE OF445.73 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT C;

THENCE SOUTH 01 DEGREES 41 MINUTES 09 SECONDS EAST (RECORD SOUTH 01 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 12 SECONDSEAST), ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT C, A DISTANCE OF 158.22 FEET TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCLE, THECENTER OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF20.00 FEET;

THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 58SECONDS, (RECORD 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF31.25 FEET (RECORD 31.24 FEET) TO THESOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT C;

THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 28 MINUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 410.35 FEET(RECORD 410.11 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE ARC OF A CIRCLE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS 00 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 59SECONDS, A DISTANCE OF20.00 FEET;

THENCE NORTHWESTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES 31 MINUTES 59SECONDS (RECORD 90 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 00 SECONDS) A DISTANCE OF31.60 FEET (RECORD 31.59 FEET) TO A POINTON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT C, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING.

(SURVEYOR'S NOTE: THIS LEGAL DESCRIPTION DOES NOT DESCRIBE A CLOSED MATHEMATICAL FIGURE)

0' 10' 20' 40' 80'

Revision Schedule

No. Date Description

PHO-1-20--Z-116-78-1 Proposed Site Plan Hearing Date: March 18, 2020

First Floor0"

Second Floor10' - 0"

Roof Plan20' - 0"

138138

305

104104

312312319

1A4.11

305

321

104

312312

32419

First Floor0"

Second Floor10' - 0"

Roof Plan20' - 0"

312312324

319

First Floor0"

Second Floor10' - 0"

Roof Plan20' - 0"

1A4.11

305

312312

131402112

322

323

319

318

0'3'

3" =

1'

0'1'

2'

1 1/

2" =

1'

0'1'

2'4'

6'

1/2"

= 1

'

0'2'

4'8'

12'

1/4"

= 1

'

0'4'

8'16

'24

'

1/8"

= 1

'

0'8'

16'

32'

48'

1/16

" =

1'

PLEA

SE R

ECYC

LE

DATE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

ART PROJECT NO.

DRAWING No.

DRAWING TITLE

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND THE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE TEAM, INC. THIS

DRAWING MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, OR REPRODUCTIONS HEREOF USED, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION

1055 e indian school rdphoenix, az 85014602-307-5399 | v

www.art-team.com

PRELI

MINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

IF T

HIS

IS N

OT

24"X

36",

IT IS

A R

EDU

CED

PRI

NT

-SC

ALE

AC

CO

RDIN

GLY

4/11

/201

9 1:

49:2

8 PM

A3.11

Building Elevations

AZ

Hou

sing

Inco

rpor

ated

Col

lins

Cou

rt P

hase

2

Checker

Author

Issue Date

19025

conceptual-design

1042

1 N

33r

d A

vePh

oeni

x, A

Z 85

051

KIV

A #

17-2

828

Revision Schedule

No. Date Description

1/8" = 1'-0"1 Building North

1/8" = 1'-0"2 Building East

1/8" = 1'-0"3 Building South

1/8" = 1'-0"4 Building West

Keynote Legend19 REMOVE EXISTING WINDOW, TYPICAL.

104 EXISTING 6'-0" HIGH WROUGHT IRON FENCING P7.112 EXISTING PEDESTRIAN GATE.131 BIKE RACK.138 EXSISTING BUILDING.305 ROOF LINE - BEYOND.312 PAINT EXTERIOR WALLS P5,TYPICAL.318 EXTERIOR DOOR.319 36X48 WINDOW, TYPICAL.321 GUARDRAIL.322 14' GREENSCREEN TO ALIGN WITH RAILING.323 ARCH. MESH RAILING.324 WALL MOUNTED GREEN SCREENS.402 STAIRS.

PHO-1-20--Z-116-78-1 Proposed Elevations Hearing Date: March 18, 2020

First Floor0"

Second Floor10' - 0"

Roof Plan20' - 0"

305 312

312312318 319

Level 10' - 0"

Level 210' - 0"

B.O. ROOF20' - 0"

T.O. Roof24' - 6"

First Floor0"

Second Floor10' - 0"

Roof Plan20' - 0"

1A4.11

305

321

319 318

First Floor0"

Second Floor10' - 0"

Roof Plan20' - 0"

321312312

305

318 319

0'3'

3" =

1'

0'1'

2'

1 1/

2" =

1'

0'1'

2'4'

6'

1/2"

= 1

'

0'2'

4'8'

12'

1/4"

= 1

'

0'4'

8'16

'24

'

1/8"

= 1

'

0'8'

16'

32'

48'

1/16

" =

1'

PLEA

SE R

ECYC

LE

DATE

DRAWN BY

CHECKED BY

ART PROJECT NO.

DRAWING No.

DRAWING TITLE

THIS DRAWING IS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE AND THE PROPERTY OF ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCE TEAM, INC. THIS

DRAWING MAY NOT BE REPRODUCED, OR REPRODUCTIONS HEREOF USED, WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION

1055 e indian school rdphoenix, az 85014602-307-5399 | v

www.art-team.com

PRELI

MINARY

NOT FOR

CONSTRUCTIO

N

IF T

HIS

IS N

OT

24"X

36",

IT IS

A R

EDU

CED

PRI

NT

-SC

ALE

AC

CO

RDIN

GLY

4/11

/201

9 1:

49:4

0 PM

A3.12

Courtyard Elevations

AZ

Hou

sing

Inco

rpor

ated

Col

lins

Cou

rt P

hase

2

Checker

Author

Issue Date

19025

conceptual-design

1042

1 N

33r

d A

vePh

oeni

x, A

Z 85

051

KIV

A #

17-2

828

Revision Schedule

No. Date Description

1/8" = 1'-0"1 C.Y. North

1/8" = 1'-0"2 C.Y. East

1/8" = 1'-0"3 C.Y. South

Keynote Legend305 ROOF LINE - BEYOND.312 PAINT EXTERIOR WALLS P5,TYPICAL.318 EXTERIOR DOOR.319 36X48 WINDOW, TYPICAL.321 GUARDRAIL.

PHO-1-20--Z-116-78-1 Proposed Elevations Hearing Date: MArch 18, 2020

City Council Minutes

k

L

·O.

:ONDED

L) -~11

:it .ise

lSe Jn-

- 3-

July 10, 1978

ZONING CASES SCHEDULED FOR RATIFICATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION

Mr. O' Dell MOVED to ratify the following nine Appli ­cations; this was SECONDED by Mrs . Carter.

There was no one present in opposition.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY .

JAY C. STUCKEY , JR .

Application No . 85 - 78 - Request of Jay C. Stuckey , Jr ., on behalf of Bel l Road Three and Warren Brown , to rezone a parcel on the north side of Bell Road extending 1, 397 ' east from a point which is 318 ' east of Black Canyon Freeway to a depth of 300' from County R- 5 (Approved City C- 0) and R- 5 to C- 2 .

The Planning Commi s sion recommended approval .

JACK LAKE

App l ication No . 108- 78 - Request of Jack Lake , on behalf of Burt P. Hann , to rezone 928 East Culver Street from R- 3 to R- 5 .

The Planning Commission recommended approval.

GEORGE MCGRATH

Application No . 109- 78 - Request of George McGrath, on behalf of Ann Steinburg and K. 0 . Trotter , to rezone 441 4- 22 North 36th Street from R- 3 to PAD- 14 .

The Planning Commission recommended approval with stipulations .

DALE RUSSELL

Application No. 110- 78 - Request of Da l e Russell , on behalf of Southwest Conference of . the United Church of Christ , to rezone the northeast corner of 47th Avenue and Thomas Road from Rl - 6 to C- 0 .

The Planning Commission recommended approval .

GEORGE WENDELKEN

App l icati on No. 112 - 78 - Request of George Wendelken , on behalf of George Wende l ken and Best Candy and Tobacco Company, to rezone 22 - 34 East Jones Avenue from R- 4 to C- 2.

The Planning Commission recommended denial , as filed , but approval of C- 2 for Lots 6 and 7 . P-1 for Lot 8 .

KNOELL BROS . CONSTRUCTION, INC .

Application No . 113- 78 - Request of Knoell Bros . Con struct i on , Inc ., to rezone the northwest corner of Tierra Buena Lane extended and 12th Str eet extended (40 acres) from S- 1 to Rl- 10 .

The Planning Commission recommended approval.

City Counciil Minutes- q-

July 10, 19 78

C . MICHAEL PIERCE

App lication No . 116- 78 - Request of C . Michael Pierce , on behalf of Jo s an Investment Company, to rezone t h e northeast side of 33rd Avenue and Cochise Drive (approximately 2 . 45 acres) from R- 4 to R- 4A.

The Planning Commission recommended a pproval with stipulations.

TED SMITH

Application No . 11 7- 78 - Request of Ted Smith , on behalf of Mutschler Investment Company , to re zone the north side of Hatcher Road , lying east of 12th Street and west of 14th Street (approximate l y 4 acres) from Rl - 6 to R- 3.

The Planning Commissio n recommended approval with right- of - way needs .

FRANCIS J . SLAVIN , JR.

Application No . 83 - 78 - Request of Francis J . Slavin , Jr ., o n behalf of Arizona Title and Trust , to rezone the east side of 19th Avenue , beginning 1,320 ' north of Thunderbird Road (approximate l y 54 . 668 acres) as fo llows : approximate l y 15 acres to PAD-14 and approximately 39 . 668 acres to Rl-8 (Zoned S- 1).

The Planning Commission recommended approva l with stipulations .

ZONING CASES SCHEDULED FOR PUBLIC HEARING

CITY OF PHOENIX PLANNING COMMISSION

The Council held public hearing on Applicat i on No . 3 4- 75 - (Cont i nued f r o m December 12, 19 77) - Request of the City of Phoenix Planning Commission that Sections 102-A and 60 1- B , 1 of Ordinance No . G- 44 9 , " The Zoning Ordinance of the Ci ty of Phoenix, " as amended be amended in the fol lowing manner :

Amend Section 102- A, to r ead :

A. I n its interpretation. and applicat i on , the provisions of t his ordinance sha l l be held to be minimum require ­ments adopted £e~-the-~~emetieft-ef TO : IMPLEMENT AND PROMOTE a comprehensive plan; aftcl-clesi~ftecl to l essen con gestion in the streets; TO PROVIDE SAFE ACCESS TO STREETS FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY ; t o secure safety from f ire , panic and other dange rs; to prov i de adequate light and a i r ; to preven t the ove rcrowding of land; to avoi d undue conce ntration of population , to faci l ­i tate the adequate provision of t rans portat i on , water, sewerage , schoo l s , parks and other public requirements ane ; to promote the pub l ic . intere st , health , comfort , convenience , safety e~ and genera l welfare; TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE PROPERTY VALUES ; TO ASSURE ORDERLY COM­MUN I TY GROWTH ; TO REGULATE THE USE OF BUILDINGS , STRUCTURES AND LAND AS BETWEEN AGRICULTURE, RESIDENCE , INDUSTRY , BUSINESS AND OTHER PURPOSES ; TO REGULATE THE LOCATION , HEIGHT , BULK , NUMBER OF STORIES AND SIZE OF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES ; TO REGULATE THE SIZE AND USE OF LOTS , YARDS , COURTS AND OTHER OPEN SPACES ; TO REGU LATE THE PERCENTAGE OF A LOT WHICH MAY BE OCCUPIED

A: n·

1

t

d 1 c t d t

i t t h a

Planning Commission Minutes

-June 14, 1978

Application No.: 116-78 Applicant: C. Michael Pierce (Owner: Josam Investment Company) Subject: To rezone the northeast side of 33rd Avenue and Cochise

(approximately 2.45 acres) from R-4 to R-4A. The granting of this application will increase the number of dwelling units allowed on this parcel from 71 to 107, approximately.

Drive

\ l

Mr. Atonna read the staff r.ecommendation which was for approval wi'th stipu-' ·lations. There are no right of way needs for this property. A letter had. been received from the Deer Valley Planning Committee recommending denial of this application.

Mr. Michael Pierce spoke representing the owner of the property. He ex­plained the City Council had recommended approval of R-4 zoning for a motel on this property in October of 197~. The staff report at that time showed 90 units being allowable; the application and site plan depicted 80 units; the project engineer computed 90 allowable units. When the applicant filed for building permits, it was discovered the site actually only permitted 71 units. This would result in a 13% deferentiation in the financial outlay to build the motel which had the same overhead costs. This application would correct an error made at that original hearing. The plan being presented was the same one presented on the first application; nothing had changed.

Mr. Pierce thought that unless the Commission did not remember would not make. an extensive presentation since it would be the before, and which was approved by both Commission and Council. in agreement with staff's suggested stipulation.

the case, he same as heard

They were

There was no one present to speak in favor of this application. Mr. Charles Michaels, Chairman of the Deer Valley Planning Comm1ttee, spoke in opposition. He stated this application had been considered at their meeting of June 1, 1978 and unanimously recommended denial. The committee had opposed this application as originally filed 'and continued in that opposition.

I Mr. Kennelly refreshed everyone's memory regarding this application. It had originally been denied by the Commission, but approved by Council for 80 units. The request now was to grant the additional units needed to make that amount. He asked Mr. Michaels if this situation altered the committee's feelings. Mr. Michaels stated that the additional units did not make them favor the change.

Mr. Bendalin asked if this should be treated as a new application or did the fact that the applicant already had a zone and wished to increase the number by 9 make it different. Mr. Atonna stated this was a totally new zone, tec.h­nically. Staff had originally opposed this application, however, now that the policy had been set by Council, they felt 9 units should not be quibbled over.

Mr. Pierce stated there was a petition available from the owners surrounding

:i63

Planning Commission Minutes

• •• June 14, 1978

the subject property in favor of the rezoning.

There were no questions and no further discussion.

Mrs. Roberts made a MOTION to forward application 116-78 to the City Council with a recommendation for approval subject to the stipulation suggested by staff.

Mr. Jackson SECONDED the motion.

There was no discussion of the motion. Mr. Kennelly called for a vote and the MOTION PASSED unanimously.

Stipulation

A maximum of 80 units to be constructed.

* * * * *

364