pmd testing in modern networks” - het koninklijk instituut …€¦ ·  · 2016-09-16“pmd...

24
PMD Testing in modern networks” Mike Harrop [email protected] September 2016

Upload: tranphuc

Post on 10-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

“PMD Testing in modern networks”

Mike Harrop

[email protected]

September 2016

2 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Table of Contents

1 Quick review of PMD

2 Impacts & limits

3 Impact of coherent systems

4 Challenges/Reducing the risk

5 Solutions

3 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Polarization Mode Dispersion Basics: DGD (1st order PMD)

DG

D (

ps)

Optical frequency

t t

Power Power

Fast

Slow

When an optical pulse with two equal polarization components

propagates through a fiber, the birefringence causes differential

group delay (DGD) between the polarization states which

results in pulse distortion/broadening.

Optical Pulse

launched at 450

from PSP

1st order can be assumed to

be wavelength independent

for optical pulses with narrow

line-width.

4 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Polarization Mode Dispersion Basics: 2nd order PMD

DG

D (

ps)

Optical frequency

<PMD>

DG

D (

ps)

Optical frequency

5 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Impact of PMD on BER

5 5

Physical Layer

Transport Layer

“Business Layer”

6 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

System Limits

Increasingly tight limits

Effect of DSP

7 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Coherent v/s Noncoherent

Coherent Receiver: contains a local oscillator (laser) for phase modulated signals (like DP-QPSK)

Polarization

controller

Signal

Local oscillator

Hybrid

Balanced

detector

Balanced

detector

ADC

DSP

Direct detection (noncoherent): contains a photodiode for on-off keying

signals

ADC

ADC

ADC

8 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

PMD is also Random and not Deterministic in Real Fibers

Because of the dynamic nature of

PMD, it doesn't have a single fixed

value for a given section of fiber.

λ @ 1533.5 nm

9 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Polarization Varies with Time in Fiber-Optic Systems

Free space: Polarization does not change with time

Fiber: Stresses → fiber birefringence variation → State of polarization variations

Sources of fiber stress › Inherent asymmetry from manufacturing

› Temperature (Slow)

› Pressure (Slow)

› Macro/Micro bending (Slow)

› Wind-caused vibration (Fast)

› Mechanically induced acoustic vibration (Fastest)

Fairly

constant

Dynamic

and random

10 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved..

High PMD Section

Vibration examples

High PMD Section

Fast changing Input

SOP

11 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Vibration examples

In central Europe ~30 strikes/100km OPGW

12 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Effect of vibration & shock

›Vibrations, thermal & mechanical shock may induce

›A very fast rate of change of PMD which the PMD tracking is unable to

keep up with.

›A PMD greater than the system can tolerate.

t

PMD

Time

Sudden PMD Jump

13 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Reducing the risk

›Plenty of 10G still being used and also now being used in new application

spaces (mobile back haul & Front haul, Metro, Broadband access)

›Even coherent systems are susceptible to fast PMD (changes) & very high

PMD.

Start with a low PMD network the probability of a PMD related impact is much

reduced.

Testing PMD is still vital as part of a links characterization.

14 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

The Situation

15 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

PMD Accumulation

Example: link built from concatenation of 4 fiber sections.

PMD for each section is: 15ps, 2ps, 1ps and 6ps.

PMDtotal2 = 225ps2 + 4ps2 + 1ps2 + 36ps2 = 266ps2

PMDtotal = sqrt(266) = 16.3ps

i

itotal PMDPMD 2

Remove 6 ps section … PMD = 15.2 ps (BAD)

vs.

Remove 15ps section … PMD = 6.4 ps (GOOD)

2 ps

6 ps 15 ps

1 ps

16 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Distributed PMD: Inside The Equipment

Polarization Beam Splitter

1520 nm to 1580 nm

Pair of close lambdas,

random SOP in FUT Scrambler

Wide Band

Source

Tunable Filter

(Wavelengths Selector)

SOA

Detectors

Circulator

Semiconductor Optical Amplifier

Output

PMD by SOP Analysis

17 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Inside The Equipment

Wavelength [nm]

18 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Inside The Equipment

• Repeat process at other Lambda Pairs & SOP’s

• Compute RMS Difference

•Uses Rayleigh Backscattering instead of end reflection

•And LOTS of data processing…!

19 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Output - Graph

OTDR trace

Cumulative PMD

20 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Output - Graph

Click on section

Details for that section

21 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Output – Contribution Histogram

22 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Conclusion

22

Modern coherent systems are very tolerant of PMD, but fast

changing or large abrupt changes may still cause problems.

Plenty of 10G being used and still being deployed.

Start with a low PMD network the probability of a PMD related

impact is much reduced.

Several tests in field can help identify PMD issues before they

happen and therefore reduce outage probability

Using standard PMD test equipment gives total PMD but no

indication where high PMD may be

Using distributed PMD equipment will help pinpoint any

problems.

23 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved.

Thank You

24 © 2016 EXFO Inc. All rights reserved..

Plattegrond (Stand nummer 17)

24