point loads on concrete slabs during...

22
1 Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Construction Dr Russell Keays Keays Engineering

Upload: nguyendat

Post on 19-Aug-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

1

Point Loads on Concrete Slabs

During Construction

Dr Russell Keays

Keays Engineering

Page 2: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

IntroductionThis paper arose from continuing requests from steel fabricators and

others to tell them which equipment could be used on concrete floors

without fear of cracking the concrete. I found that estimates by others

were simplistic and most restrictive.

• Loads from typical construction equipment

• Metal Tray Slab Capacity

– Punching Shear

– Sagging Moments

– Hogging Moments

– Crack Control

• Reinforced and Prestressed Slabs

• Code & Legislative requirements

• Conclusions.

2

Page 3: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

But first – some cracks

3In-service cracking at a Dan Murphy store.(I must be doing something right – I have no evidence of cracking from construction loads.)

Page 4: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Access Equipment

4

Page 5: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Telehandlers and Forklifts

5

Tyre inflation

pressure is

used to

calculate

footprint.

Page 6: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Spider Lifts

6

Page 7: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Mini Cranes with long outriggers

7

Page 8: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Bubble Cranes & Frannas

8

Page 9: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

This is what happens if you don’t do

calculations!

9

Incident: Friday Morning 26/09/08 – Castle Hill/Sydney Australia

- 9 Day Old 250t Leibherr Crane (never used before)

- $4mill price tag

- Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

- Crane support outrigger punches through slab causing crane to lose

balance and collapse across the site and onto adjoining property

- Crane balanced in the air for approx 1 hour before entire rig & boom

collapse completely across site and rigs falls through to the basement

level.

Amazing that no-one was seriously injured or killed.

Page 10: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Other bits and pieces

10

Scaffold stanchions28kN working

42kN ULS

Panel Props – up/down forces

Best located directly over band beam

Loading DocksDown Loads on edge of slab. Up load

internal.Design props to be stronger than primary beam

strength in case Dock is hit by crane

hook/descending load.

Page 11: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Tower Cranes and

Concrete Pumping Units

11

Usually require change to concrete design.

So position is typically fixed before concrete in placed.

Page 12: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Calculation of

Wheel/Outrigger Loads• Sometimes provided by supplier

• Otherwise:

– Calculate overturning load from load

– Estimate boom weight & its overturning load

– Assume design for stability is 75% of overturning load to get

c.g. of machine’s weight.

– Thence simple maths

12

Page 13: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Summary of Typical Loads

13

Machine Working Ultimate Pad Size Spacings Notes

kN kN* mm m x m

Spider Outrigger 16 24 133 x 133 3.0 x 3.0 Adjacent at 50%

Scissorlift 18 27 250 x 120 2.1 x 4.0 All

Formwork Standard 28 42 150 x 150 2.4 x 1.2 All

Boomlift 10m 34 51 300 x 188 1.7 x 1.7 Adjacent at 50%

Forklift 35 53 250 x 235 0.9 Front Axle

Mini Crawler Crane 42 62 200 x 200 4.5 Adjacent at 50%

Panel Prop 41 62 225 x 140 1.5 typ. Maximum

Telehandler 50 75 603 x 414 1.85 Or 80% at 1.5t max

Boomlift 18m 53 79 400 x 219 2.2 x 2.2 Adjacent at 50%

Bubble Crane 115 172 400 x 400 4.5 Adjacent at 50%

Page 14: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Analysis of Metal-Tray Slabs - Punching Shear

14

1. Assume load uniform over pad (or tyre footprint).

2. No particular rules for metal-tray slabs in AS3600.

3. EuroCode consider along-rib but not across-rib shear.

4. ANSI/SDI C2011 (USA) adopted, but with AS3600 factors.

5. Along ribs – same as AS3600, but add shear strength of ribs.

6. Across ribs – used section depth above ribs, transverse reo used to calculate

capacity.

Page 15: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Sagging Moments

15

Effective width – AS3600 Cl.9.6 gives Pad Width + 30% Span.

Used ½ this following yield line analysis.

Assumed simply supported span of 3m.

Loads are for 18m Boomlift. Bending strength – passes.

Page 16: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Hogging Moments

• If slab is strong enough in sag as a simply supported

beam, then analysis of Hogging Moments is not required.

• Otherwise, it depends on how much fire and crack control

reo is provided.

16

Page 17: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Crack Control

• As a general rule, there should be no wheel or equipment loads on the slab until it reaches

design strength. It might be worth considering a lower strength if calculations show a partly

cured slab can take the design loads.

• If a screed topping is to be added to the slab after steel construction work above is

completed, this should seal any cracks developed during construction. Hence, analysis of

cracking during construction should not be required.

• Detailed analysis depends on the amount of negative reo in the slab.

17

Page 18: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Conclusions on Metal Tray Slabs

• It looks as though a 130 slab in N32 with 1.0mm Bondeck is tough

enough for the normal range of equipment for the steel erector.

• The author has some doubts about whether the effective width in

AS3600 applies to metal tray slabs. Someone should do some

testing!

• ANSI/SDI C2011 (USA) recommends against using metal tray

slabs where fork-lifts are to be used in service.

18

Page 19: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Reinforced & Prestressed Slabs

• Given the wide range of possible configurations of the slabs, it is not so easy

to generalize on their capacity.

• But then there is typically less need for heavy plant for constructing the floor

above. (Except perhaps a forklift for removing formwork.)

• This may not be the case when the Plant Rooms have a steel-framed roof.

However, Plant Room floors are typically designed for 7.5kPa, making them

more likely to be robust enough to take the loads from the steel erection

equipment.

19

Page 20: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Code & Legislative Requirements

• AS/NZS 1170.1 “Actions resulting from construction are not covered in this Standard”. The

Commentary warns of consequences, but provides little further assistance.

• AS3600, Clause 1.4(d) requires design documentation to include “Any constraint on construction

assumed in design”. At face value, that would require the designer to nominate the maximum wheel

loads allowed during construction, but I have never seen that!

• “Safety in Design” legislation in some States requires the permanent works designer to consider

construction needs, but all I have seen is delegation to the builder.

• Is this appropriate? Given the current situation where buildings and bridges are more likely to collapse

during construction, isn’t it time that permanent works structural design engineers paid more attention

to providing a safe working environment for the construction crew?

20

Page 21: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

21

END

© Keays Engineering 2016

Dr Russell Keays

Keays Engineering

367 North Road, Caulfield South

0412 770 700

[email protected]

Point Loads on Concrete Slabs

During Construction

Page 22: Point Loads on Concrete Slabs During Constructionasec2016.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/Russell-Keays.pdf · - Failure of back propping beneath the 200mm thick concrete deck

Other floors

2221PLY 600 SPAN

3FLPL – 600 SPAN