political participation & local government (pl.sc. 422) fiscal choice and expressing “voice”
TRANSCRIPT
Political Participation & Local Government (Pl.Sc.
422)
Fiscal Choice and Expressing “Voice”
Waves of Democracy & Reverse Waves of Authoritarianism
First long wave 1828 – 1926 First reverse wave 1922 – 1944 Second short wave 1943-1964 Second reverse wave 1962-1975
In Latin America
What difference has “Third Wave Democracy Made for how local governments function?
Historic Lima
Third Wave Democracy Begins
Local elections return More government offices fill by
elections Legacy for local government from
decades of central control Aloof Opaque Closed to citizen input
Political Participation Quickly became chief propellant for the
“quiet revolution,” but existed previously Loud course of citizen demands
traditionally targetd specific and highly visual issues Street demonstrations Union movements Organized neighborhood groups
After decentralization, participation became part of the steering mechanism in many local governments
Voices from Below Action From Below: tapping into grassroots opinion
Typically practiced by local authorities by visiting local groups
Inviting them to city hall Town meetings Citizen pannels Polling
Voices from Below Action From Below: mobilizing grassroots groups
Participatory budgeting Porto Alegre (Brazil) model Residents incorporated into decisions about
capital investment in their city Participation: local
implementation/execution Comites de solidaridad (Mexico- supervising
specific projects)) Comites de vigilencia (watchdog groups –
Bolivia) Parroquias in Venezuela
Voices from Below Action From Below: beneficiary contributions
Counterpart contributions (targeted on neighborhood improvement projects)
Targeted tax increases Condominial operation of public
services (sewage systems in Brazil)
Voices from Below Action From Below: citizen-initiated contact
Municipal associations rank/rate municipal governments
Office at which citizens can communicate complaints directly to elected officials
Ombudsman office None of these contact points existed
prior to the “quiet revolution”
Voices from Below Action From Below: electoral and voting systems
Ballot box to change unresponsive local governments
Ballot box to gain support for borrowing and spending
Separation of local and non-local elections
Voices from Below Action From Below: legal and judicial system
Participation through legal and judicial actions in its infancy
Impeachment – rare but some evidence it is now viewed as an option
To be effective requires a complex infrastructure of law, case histories, local courts & professional expertise
Generally absent in Latin America
To Summarize: Common Denominator of post-
decentralization Participation
Officials at many levels of government believed that their interest lay in: tapping into grass roots groups Mobilizing new ones
Goal: expand role of citizen participation in local government
Additional Points: Participation in US vs.
Latin America National, not local capture has long
been important in Latin America Unclear the extent that municipal
orientation has been consolidated Participatory experience during “Quiet
Revolution demonstrate what is possible under new “rules of the game”
Continuing outside engagement may be necessary prevent backsliding
Final Critical Lesson Power sharing and participation mean
that traditional measure of local government performance – where local goods and services are delivered efficiently – is not enough
For strong and vigorous local government to be institutionalized
Local governments must become mechanisms of accountability