pompeii (and rome) water supply...

38
i POMPEII (AND ROME) WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS REPORT OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS (OCTOBER 2010) JUNE 2011

Upload: dodat

Post on 01-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

i

POMPEII (AND ROME) WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS

REPORT OF FIELD OBSERVATIONS (OCTOBER 2010)

JUNE 2011

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This report was prepared by Wayne Lorenz with a detailed review by Erik Baros and Meisha Hunter. The final draft was assembled by Nicole Chancey. Photographs in this report were taken by Wayne Lorenz and Erik Baros. The maps shown in Figures 11 and 18 were prepared by Erik Baros. The Project Team would like to thank Ken Wright, Wright Paleohydrological Institute, and Wright Water Engineers, Inc. for support and encouragement during the study of Roman aqueducts in the Pompeii and Rome Regions.

iii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 3Page

1.1 Authorization – Superintendant of Archaeology ................................................................. 4

2.0 INTERVIEWS WITH EXPERTS....................................................................................... 5 2.1 Giuseppe Illiano .................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Raffaella Bosso ................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Luigi Sorrentino and Marilena Noppi................................................................................... 5 2.4 Giovanni De Feo and Sabino De Gisi ................................................................................. 6 2.5 Pasquale Maiella and Public Works Staff at Avella ............................................................ 7 2.6 Paolo Iandolo ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.7 Direttore Varrone ................................................................................................................. 8 2.8 Dr. Anna Maria Sodo........................................................................................................... 9 2.9 Professore Mattia Crespi .................................................................................................... 9

3.0 SITES VISITED AND MAJOR OBSERVATIONS ........................................................... 9 3.1 City of Pompeii .................................................................................................................. 10

3.1.1 Castellum Aquae ............................................................................................ 10 3.1.2 House of the Hanging Balcony ....................................................................... 13 3.1.3 Pompeii Wells ................................................................................................. 17

3.2 Pompeii Region ................................................................................................................. 18 3.2.1 Tirone – Serino ............................................................................................... 19 3.2.2 Muro d’Arce ..................................................................................................... 21 3.2.3 Acquaro-Pelosi and Urciuoli Springs .............................................................. 22 3.2.4 Avella Springs and the Roman Aqueduct Bridge ........................................... 24 3.2.5 Roccarainaolla Qanats ................................................................................... 25

3.3 Rome Region .................................................................................................................... 26 3.3.1 Traiana Aqueduct at the American Academy in Rome................................... 26 3.3.2 Source Springs and Aqueduct Section – Aqua Claudia and Marcia .............. 27 3.3.3 Source Springs – Virgo ................................................................................... 27

4.0 FUTURE STUDY AND ACTION PLAN ......................................................................... 28 5.0 REFERENCES .............................................................................................................. 30

iv

TABLES

Table 1 Water Quality of the Acquaro-Pelosi Springs Compared to Barbegal Springs .............................. 23

FIGURES

Figure 1. The October 2010 Pompeii Field Trip Team in the Anio River Watershed. From left: Gail Lorenz, Wayne Lorenz, Erik Baros, and Meisha Hunter. ....................................................................... 2

Figure 2. Gruppo Archeologico Avellano – Terra di Palma. From left: Luigi Sorrentino, Wayne Lorenz, Gail Lorenz, Meisha Hunter, Marilena Noppi, and Erik Baros. .................................................. 6

Figure 3. Castellum Aquae at Pompeii. Three Major Supply Pipelines Exited Building at Lower Part of Wall. ......................................................................................................................................... 10

Figure 4. Aqueduct Outlet to the Castellum with Meisha Hunter. ............................................................... 12Figure 5. House of the Hanging Balcony with Support Scaffolding. ........................................................... 13Figure 6. Water Tower Serving the House of the Hanging Balcony. .......................................................... 14Figure 7. Following the Piping into the House of the Hanging Balcony. ..................................................... 15Figure 8. Piping Manifold with Valves – House of the Hanging Balcony. ................................................... 16Figure 9. Survey at the House of the Hanging Balcony. ............................................................................. 16Figure 10. Pompeii Well Structure Located Behind a Public Fountain. ...................................................... 18Figure 11. Schematic Layout of the Serino (Augustan) Aqueduct. (From DeFeo) ..................................... 19Figure 12. Serino Aqueduct (Looking Westerly) at Tirone Showing the South Channel (323 A.D.) on the

Left and North (Old) Channel on the Right. ............................................................................. 20Figure 13. Southern Aqueduct Dimensions. Built by Constantine in 323 A.D. ........................................... 21Figure 14. Acquaro-Pelosi Springs – Round Spring House Showing Water Cascading From Infiltration

Galleries to Clearwell. .............................................................................................................. 23Figure 15. Roman Aqueduct Bridge at Avella. ............................................................................................ 25Figure 16. Inside the Triania Aqueduct underneath the American Academy of Rome. ............................. 26Figure 17. Current Day Water Tower at the Site of the Groundwater Spring Used for the Ancient Virgo

Aqueduct that Served Rome. .................................................................................................. 28Figure 18. Route of Avella and Serino (Augustus) Aqueducts. ................................................................. 29

APPENDIX

A Authorization Letters dated September 19, 2010 and October 25, 2010 from the Superintendant of Archaeology at Pompeii

v

October 2010 Field Trip – Research Sites and Aqueduct Alignment

REPORT OF FIELD INVESTIGATIONS – POMPEII, ITALY (AND ROME) OCTOBER 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 1 June 2011

In October, 2010, the Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. (WPI) conducted field studies in

Italy of water systems associated with the ancient site of Pompeii. This trip to Pompeii was the

initial field visit to the area by WPI with the major purposes of reconnaissance and initial field

measurements of study areas. The team also visited Rome and several major aqueduct sites in

the areas surrounding Rome.

The field team consisted of the following people (the team photograph is Figure 1):

Wayne Lorenz – Director of Roman Aqueduct Research for WPI. Wayne is manager of

the Pompeii research.

Gail Lorenz – Logistics and energy maintenance assistant.

Erik Baros – GIS and GPS specialist formerly with Wright Water Engineers, Inc. and

now with Geospatial Consultants. Erik was invited to be on the field team to address the

GIS aspects of the alignment of the Pompeii Branch and the Serino Aqueducts.

Meisha Hunter – Historical preservation specialist with Li/Saltzman Architects in New

York City. Meisha speaks fluent Italian, studied the Virgo Aqueduct at the American

Academy in Rome, and has contacts in the Rome area.

The purpose of this report is to document the field activities and interviews conducted during the

October, 2010 field study. The dates and general locations of this study were: October 20 to 22

in Rome; October 23 to 25 in Pompeii and the surrounding region; October 26 at University of

Salerno, Avella, and Pompeii; October 27 Avella and Pompeii; October 28 Serino Springs and

Avella.

This report represents only a portion of the field measurements that were conducted on aqueduct

sections and within the City of Pompeii. Further study of the information that was gathered will

be carried out. The results of these further studies will be presented in separate, more detailed,

publications.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 2 June 2011

Figure 1. The October 2010 Pompeii Field Trip Team in the Anio River Watershed. From left: Gail Lorenz,

Wayne Lorenz, Erik Baros, and Meisha Hunter.

There are many highlights of this field visit and much new information obtained. These

highlights include:

• Field surveys and detailed measurements of the water supply serving a house in the City

of Pompeii, the House of the Hanging Balcony (Casa Balcone de Pensile).

• A meeting and discussion with Giovanni De Feo and Sabino De Gisi, leading researchers

on the Serino Aqueduct and professors at the University of Salerno.

• A field visit to the Acquaro, Pelosi, and the Urciuoli Springs. These springs are the

sources of water for the Serino Aqueduct and were used to obtain modern water quality

data of the spring water.

• Visits to the Avella Springs area and meeting with the Town Public Works staff to

understand the ancient use of the springs. The WPI Project Team members were the first

foreigners to visit the Sambuco Spring, near Avella.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 3 June 2011

• Obtained measurements of several Avella and Serino Aqueducts remnants: Tirone, Muro

D’Arce, and the Fontenelle Valley north of Avella.

• Toured the Anio River Valley and the sources of water for several of the great aqueducts

near Rome.

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The Ancient Romans were not the first to build an urban settlement at the site of Pompeii. From

at least the 6th Century, the Greeks, Etruscans, Samnites, and then Romans used this strategic site

for urban development. It is somewhat hard to visualize today, but Pompeii was essentially a

harbor town situated on the River Sarno in the fertile area of Campania. The Greek geographer,

Strabo, claimed that Pompeii served as a port for Nola, Nuceria, and Acherrae (Berry, 2007).

After the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius in 79 A.D., the area surrounding Pompeii was significantly

changed. This included the relocation of the Sarno River to the south of Pompeii.

The long archaeological history and the changes in geography came into focus during our field

visit. There are many archaeological sites that have significance regarding water supply and

transport. The important water structures were no doubt used and restored (many times over) by

earlier peoples, the Romans (both pre- and post-eruption), and by later and more modern

civilizations. This is almost always the case with the study of Roman aqueducts and a

fascinating element that can be studied in detail to weave a story of design and

construction/reconstruction.

The unique aspect of Pompeii, the change in the landscape due to the 79 A.D. eruption, really

only factors in to the investigation of the alignment of aqueducts within a proximity of 5 to 10

kilometers from Mt. Vesuvius and Pompeii.

Water supplies that were used in Pompeii are well documented. It is known that the groundwater

supply was used by the city inhabitants and there are many existing well structures located

within Pompeii for providing water from the supply. Rainwater and roof runoff were also water

supplies that were collected on a household basis. Many of the individual houses in Pompeii

have compluviums (i.e., gutters and holes in the roof) and impluviums (i.e., cisterns) that were

used to collect rainwater. The Sarno River may have also been a source of water, since it was

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 4 June 2011

fed by the Sarno Springs which are located within 13 kilometers (8 miles) northeast of Pompeii.

Finally, aqueducts were used to bring spring water from the nearby Apennine Mountains.

Although it is known that aqueducts were used to bring water to Roman Pompeii, there are some

historical aspects of the aqueducts that are uncertain. The great Serino Aqueduct was

constructed between 12 and 6 B.C.; during the Augustan Age. Therefore, the Serino Aqueduct is

often referred to as the Augustan Aqueduct. It is reported that a branch of the Serino serviced

Pompeii until at least 62 A.D. and may have serviced Pompeii until the eruption in 79 A.D.

Prior to the construction of the Serino, there was an aqueduct and source that serviced Pompeii.

The water source and aqueduct of this earlier Pompeii branch has been the subject of more recent

studies (Ohlig, 2001). We are calling this earlier aqueduct the Avella Aqueduct. The water

source and alignment of this earlier Pompeii branch were of interest to the Project Team during

this site visit.

A major water engineering feature of Pompeii is the distribution system that was constructed to

deliver the aqueduct water to the city’s inhabitants. Prior to the site visit, the Project Team

performed research to identify one dwelling that used aqueduct water for specific study. The

House of the Hanging Balcony was selected, since it is one of the only dwellings in Pompeii

where the lead piping still exists in the house and the piping can be traced back to one of the

nearby water distribution towers.

1.1 Authorization – Superintendant of Archaeology

WPI requested permission from the Superintendant of Archaeology at Pompeii, to study the

water handling system within the city, visit and take measurements of the old Serino Aqueduct

outside of the city, and take GPS measurements. In August, 2010, WPI received an

Authorization Letter from the Superintendant to perform these studies. The Authorization Letter

is included in Appendix A. The authorization was for the month of October, 2010.

Once the Project Team arrived in Pompeii, it was made known that the Superintendent that

signed the WPI Authorization Letter (Prof. Giuseppe Projetti) had been replaced and the

authorization to study in the City was no longer valid.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 5 June 2011

On October 25, 2010, after meetings with the Pompeii Administrative staff (Assistant

Superintendant Varrone) at the site, the team received reauthorization for study and access to

specific areas in Pompeii. The reauthorization was signed by the new Superintendent, Jeannette

Papadopoulos. The authorization for access specifically addressed the House of the Hanging

Balcony. This second Authorization Letter is also included in Appendix A.

2.0 INTERVIEWS WITH EXPERTS

The visits and interviews with Pompeii experts regarding hydraulics and aqueducts were

highlights of the October 2010 studies. We also conducted several interviews of experts that

were located in Rome. The following sections describe each interview in detail and the

highlights of these discussions.

2.1 Giuseppe Illiano

Prior to our trip, we contacted the Italian Institute in Denver to assist us in finding a guide

located in the Pompeii area for our fieldwork. Mr. Giuseppe Illiano was our guide for three days

while we were in the Pompeii area. Giuseppe speaks excellent English, made some very

important appointments for us, and was a tireless worker. He has a degree in Foreigners and

Modern Literatures Languages from the Istituto Universitaro Oreientale in Naples. For this trip,

Giuseppe arranged our appointments with Raffaella Bosso, people from the Gruppo

Archeologico Avellano, Public Works staff at the Town of Avella, and engineers at A.R.I.N. at

the Acquaro, Pelosi, and Urciuoli Springs.

2.2 Raffaella Bosso

We met Ms. Bosso in the ancient City of Pompeii where she provided technical background on

some of the water systems in the city. Ms. Bosso has an advanced degree in Archaeology from

the University of Naples. She is currently researching the possible existence of one of the lead

water storage tanks that stood atop one of the water towers in Pompeii.

2.3 Luigi Sorrentino and Marilena Noppi

Mr. Sorrentino and Ms. Noppi represent the Gruppo Archeologico Avellano – Terra di Palma.

We met Mr. Sorrentino and Ms. Noppi at the Serino Aqueduct archaeological site at Tirone and

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 6 June 2011

Muro d’Arce. Mr. Sorrentino is an engineer and has written a book on archaeology in the Palma

area. Mr. Sorrentino presented us with a complimentary copy of his book during our visit

(Antichita’a Palma Campania). Mr. Sorrentino, Ms. Noppi, Mr. Illiano, and the Project Team

are shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Gruppo Archeologico Avellano – Terra di Palma. From left: Luigi Sorrentino, Wayne Lorenz,

Gail Lorenz, Meisha Hunter, Marilena Noppi, and Erik Baros.

2.4 Giovanni De Feo and Sabino De Gisi

Dr. De Feo and Dr. De Gisi are professors that instruct engineering at the University of Salerno

in Salerno, Italy.

We spent much of a rainy day (October 26, 2010) with De Feo and De Gisi in a meeting room at

the University. During our discussions, we discovered that the majority of De Feo’s work on the

Serino Aqueduct has been a “desktop survey” with very little field work. We discussed several

good references for the Serino Aqueduct research including L’Acqua Del Serino by Ottavaniano

De Biase. Other items discussed at this meeting were:

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 7 June 2011

• The marble epigraph found at the Acquaro-Pelosi Spring which listed the towns that

receive water from the Serino Aqueduct; in order of water amount.

• The Serino Aqueduct is the longest of all Roman aqueducts.

• According to De Feo, the only areas of remnants of the Serino Aqueduct are near Sarno

and Castel San Giorgio.

• De Gisi is an expert on the Roman reservoirs. He discussed the Piscina Mirabilis, the

reservoir at the terminus of the Serino Aqueduct. This reservoir had a storage volume of

approximately 12,600 cubic meters (335,000 gallons).

• The Piscina Mirabilis and Serino Aqueducts were built sometime between 33 and 6 B.C.

(i.e., Augustine).

• The Piscina Mirabilis may have been used for storage of water to supply to Roman ships

since the location of the reservoir is about 150 meters (500 feet) from the harbor.

• De Feo discussed what is called the “Dragon’s Plain” and the “Dragon’s Mouth” where

surface water enters a limestone sinkhole to recharge some of the groundwater springs in

the area. There are concerns regarding water quality of the surface water that enters the

Dragon’s Mouth.

• De Feo told us that Roman engineers built the qanat at Roccaraniola. Qanats are water

supply tunnels with vertical shafts that tap into subterranean water supplies. We later

visited the qanat during our field visit to the Town of Avella.

• De Feo was sure that there was a branch of the Serino Aqueduct that served

Herculaneum, and this branch may have gone from Pompeii to Herculaneum.

2.5 Pasquale Maiella and Public Works Staff at Avella

Pasquale Maiella was most helpful. Mr. Maiella, an architect, is on the Publics Works staff of

the Town of Avella. He arranged for meetings with several townspeople including Nicola

Montanile, Avella’s local historian. These people described the springs that were located above

the town, explained that there were several millstone buildings that used the power of the water

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 8 June 2011

coming from the springs to grind grain, and told us of the Roman aqueduct bridge to the north of

town. They also gave a tour of all of these locations.

In addition, they explained that the rivers in the area had changed their course after the Mt.

Vesuvius eruption in 79 A.D. The Coghinas River, prior to the eruption, connected with the

Sarno River in the general area of Pompeii. After the eruption, the river changed its course

toward Nola and Naples.

During our visit to Avella, we also met the Mayor of the Town, Ms. Carmela Guerriero.

All of the people that we interviewed in the town thought that it was very possible that Pompeii

received water from the Avella Springs since the route for an aqueduct would not have to

traverse mountains and the descent from the springs to Pompeii would have been quite direct.

2.6 Paolo Iandolo

Paolo Iandolo is an engineer with the Naples Water Company (Azienda Risorse Idriche Napoli

[ARIN]). We met Mr. Iandolo at the Acquaro and Pelosi Springs and later visited the Urciuoli

Spring with Mr. Iandolo. He was very helpful with the engineering aspects of the current

delivery system that provided water from the springs to the City of Naples. He also provided

background on the Roman use of the modern day springs.

At our request, Mr. Iandolo provided water quality of the springs after we were back in Denver.

The ancient and modern aqueducts took separate paths with the modern aqueduct traveling some

57 kilometers to the City of Naples. The ancient Serino Aqueduct traveled 92 kilometers all the

way to the Piscina Mirabilis located to the northwest of the City of Naples.

2.7 Direttore Varrone

Dr. Varrone is the Director of Excavations at the City of Pompeii. We met briefly with him to

obtain final permission to perform work in Pompeii. He told us that we were welcome to do

work at the Castellum Aquae and the House of the Hanging Balcony; however, we could not

perform any work at the Stabian Baths due to restoration activities being conducted during our

visit.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 9 June 2011

Dr. Varrone also directed us to the work completed by Christoph Ohlig and told us that it was the

best reference for the water/hydraulic work that we were there to perform.

2.8 Dr. Anna Maria Sodo

At the suggestion of Dr. Varrone, we met with Dr. Sodo at the Archaeological Information

System Vesuvius (SIAV) which is part of the Archaeological Superintendent’s Office of

Pompeii, located in the building of the Museum of Bosco Reale. The SIAV is a database that

addresses the details of Pompeii. We were told that, in the coming years, a computer record of

all data relating to archaeological sites around Vesuvius would be available in the SIAV.

We received a significant amount of detailed GIS and AutoCAD data from the SIAV after our

return to Denver.

2.9 Professore Mattia Crespi

On November 3, 2010, Meisha Hunter met with Prof. Crespi and three Ph.D. students in the

Geodesic Engineering Department of the Universita la Sapienza in Rome. Prof. Crespi

mentioned that two of his students are archaeologists (Jolanda Patruno, Nicole Dore) who are

working on radar imaging and creating digital terrain models (DTM) of certain UNESCO sites.

They are also working with coarse version SRTM free NOAA 3x3, and RTK (real time

kinematic). Prof. Crespi and his students were interested in assisting with documenting the

alignment of the aqueduct from Avella to Pompeii, and suggested that some underground points

may be located using ground penetrating radar.

3.0 SITES VISITED AND MAJOR OBSERVATIONS

Much of our time in Italy was spent in the field performing observations and measurements of

the physical remnants. Although we visited some very unique areas in Rome, the major

objective of the field visit was to study the water features in the Pompeii area. So, this section is

organized by the specific sites visited, first in Pompeii and then Rome.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 10 June 2011

3.1 City of Pompeii

Several sites within the City of Pompeii were studied specifically. These include the Castellum

Aquae, House of the Hanging Balcony, and Pompeii Wells.

3.1.1 Castellum Aquae

The Castellum Aquae is located at the Porta del Vesuvio on the north side of the city. This

building is the highest elevation of Pompeii at approximately 42 meters (138 feet). This

structure was the distribution point of the aqueduct water supply entering Pompeii. Once the

water reached the Castellum, it was split into three major pipelines for distribution. We have

learned that the lower, primary part of the Castellum was supposedly built with the initial

aqueduct (i.e., Avella Aqueduct) just after Pompeii became a Roman colony in 80 B.C. Later,

when the Serino Aqueduct was built (12 to 6 B.C.), the Castellum was modified to its existing

shape. A photograph of the outside of the Castellum is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3. Castellum Aquae at Pompeii. Three Major Supply Pipelines Exited Building at Lower Part of Wall.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 11 June 2011

The Castellum has a circular interior layout, approximately 6 meters (20 feet) in diameter. It

contains an interior domed vault and exterior trapezoidal dimensions. On the lower portion of

the southern wall, the three major pipelines exited the Castellum. On the exterior south wall,

there are three arches that have been filled in with brickwork, perhaps rebuilt after 62 A.D., when

the earthquake occurred.

During our visit, we were allowed the special privilege (by permission of Dr. Varone) of entering

the interior of the Castellum to make measurements and then to crawl through the influent tunnel

aqueduct for 16.5 meters (54 feet) to exit from a square vent shaft. This influent tunnel is the

aqueduct that was used as an escape route during the Vesuvius eruption for the main characters

Attilia and Corelia in Robert Harris’ novel Pompeii.

The upstream vent shaft also served as a junction of two tunnel aqueduct sections, one from the

north and a second from the east. The primary aqueduct is oriented from the north. The source

of this second branch from the east is unknown. We made measurements of the shaft and tunnel.

Measurements of the aqueduct section entering the Castellum showed a width of 52 cm (20

inches) and a height of 140 cm (55 inches). The aqueduct width measured at the shaft was also

52 cm (20 inches). There is a smaller channel section at the bottom of the aqueduct that

measures 23 cm (9 inches) wide and 30 cm (12 inches) deep. This smaller section is what was

believed to be used for conveying water with the upper wider channel used for maintenance

access. The aqueduct outlet to the Castellum is shown in Figure 4.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 12 June 2011

Figure 4. Aqueduct Outlet to the Castellum with Meisha Hunter.

There is a wall painting above the aqueduct entrance to the Castellum that includes a garland

(indicative of prosperity), a river, and three nymphs.

We consulted the security guard manning a checkpoint located outside the gates, immediately

north of the Castellum to determine if he had any knowledge of the aqueduct. He was not aware

of any remnants and does not have any idea of the alignment of the aqueduct that most likely

went through his property.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 13 June 2011

3.1.2 House of the Hanging Balcony

In our research prior to the field trip to Pompeii, we discovered that the lead water distribution

pipe system has been completely preserved in only one house in the entire city, Casa del Balcone

Pensile (Jansen, 2001), see Figure 5. So, we chose the House of the Hanging Balcony (the

House) to obtain field measurements and investigate the hydraulics of water service to the

House.

Figure 5. House of the Hanging Balcony with Support Scaffolding.

During our first visit, we were unable to enter the House since it was padlocked and the staff did

not have the key. We came back the next day after the staff had cut the lock. According to the

staff, our team was the first to visit the interior of the House for several years.

Water that served the House was distributed from the Castellum to one of 17 local water towers

in the city, see Figure 6. The water tower that served the House is to the west along Avenue

Vicolo Del Balcone Pensile with the base of the tower at approximately elevation of 32 meters

(105 feet). This is approximately 10 meters (33 feet) less than the elevation of the Castellum.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 14 June 2011

We measured the height of the water tower at 6.27 meters (21 feet) and its location is only 28

meters (92 feet) from the front door of the House. Based on our observations, lead piping ran

from the tower on both sides of the Avenue Vicolo Del Balcone Pensile to the east of the tower.

The piping fed other houses and a public fountain approximately 44 meters (144 feet) from the

tower.

Figure 6. Water Tower Serving the House of the Hanging Balcony.

As reported by Jansen, the piping within the House has been preserved from the outside of the

front door to the water feature located inside. The piping has an inside clear diameter of

approximately 30 mm (1.2 inches) and we observed some calcium carbonate scaling on the

inside surfaces of the pipe. We followed the piping from the door into the center area of the

House, where we discovered a manifold with 4 valves to control water flow, see Figures 7 and 8.

The manifold and valve assembly was remarkable since it is very similar to what is used in

modern residential plumbing, see Figure 8. The valves appeared to be made of bronze (due to

the green discoloring of the valve bodies by oxidation since the uncovering).

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 15 June 2011

Figure 7. Following the Piping into the House of the Hanging Balcony.

The water served by the piping system was used in a water fountain statue of a small boy with

water coming out of his hand. Two other pipes went from the manifold system to fountains that

jetted water from curved sections of small lead pipes to a catch basin below the statue. The

statue is no longer in the House, but we have a photo taken of the statue, in situ, just after

excavation of the House (in 1897). Since our trip, we have also located the statue (by letter with

the Superintendent) in the storage area of Pompeii artifacts recovered during excavations that are

not currently on display.

Also, as shown in Figure 9, we borrowed a level instrument from a Spanish archeological team

from the University of Salamanca that was doing work in Pompeii. Based on survey, the House

had a water pressure at the fountain of about 4.8 meters (15.7 feet).

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 16 June 2011

Figure 8. Piping Manifold with Valves – House of the Hanging Balcony.

Figure 9. Survey at the House of the Hanging Balcony.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 17 June 2011

3.1.3 Pompeii Wells

Prior to the aqueduct bringing water to Pompeii, the inhabitants relied on groundwater and

rainwater as supplies. There are 22 deep wells that have been identified in the excavated portion

of Pompeii. Several of these wells were larger than others and served important functions of

providing water to the public baths.

The depth of groundwater beneath Pompeii is between 20 and 37 meters (66 and 121 feet), with

the shallower depth occurring in the lower city surface elevations on the south side and the

deeper groundwater located on the north side.

We inspected several wells during the Pompeii site visit. We visited a well that served the

Stabian Bath (2.90 meters by 2.0 meters by approximately 25 meters deep). This well had

calcium carbonate scaling on the sides where the water was pulled from the well. It is known

that a water lifting mechanism was used to haul up the water from the well into the bath

complex. We were denied detailed study access to the Stabian Bath since a restoration campaign

was in progress. We measured another large well structure with interior dimensions of 2 meters

by 2.4 meters (6.5 feet by 8 feet) at a location behind a public fountain in Pompeii at the

approach of Region VI, from the direction of the Pompeii Forum. A photograph of this well

structure is shown in Figure 10. This well had a foundation of a water tower (outside dimensions

of 1 meter by 1.2 meters) adjacent to the well wall. This suggests that the well may have been

used to provide groundwater to the water tower. Perhaps the water towers were in use before the

aqueducts were constructed?

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 18 June 2011

Figure 10. Pompeii Well Structure Located Behind a Public Fountain.

Two other wells were observed. One was at the Terme Del Foro, also with an adjacent water

tower. This well is also known to have had a lifting mechanism. Another well was a private

house well at Casa Di Sallustio located in the corner of a room towards the front of the house.

3.2 Pompeii Region

The Avella and Serino Aqueduct systems that brought water from outside of the city were a

major focus of our field studies. A schematic layout of the Serino Aqueduct is shown in

Figure 11. We traveled in the Pompeii Region to gather information regarding these systems.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 19 June 2011

Figure 11. Schematic Layout of the Serino (Augustan) Aqueduct. (From DeFeo)

3.2.1 Tirone – Serino

The aqueduct vestiges at Tirone are located about 12.3 kilometers (7.7 miles) north from the

Castellum Aquae. These ruins are in a key location; in the area where the earlier constructed

Avella Aqueduct was intersected with the later Serino Aqueduct. With what we know now, the

Tirone artifacts are the closest remaining aqueduct sections to the city. One of the objectives of

future study will be to determine if there are other remnants that are on a theoretical aqueduct

alignment from Tirone to the Castellum (we have learned that there may be other remnants in

private houses in the Tirone area).

The remnants at Tirone are fenced and accessible by a gate that is normally locked. We were

allowed into the site by Mr. Sorrentino and Ms. Noppi of the Gruppo Archeologico Avellano –

Terra Di Palma. The Tirone site is fascinating in many ways. First, there are two parallel

sections of the Serino, as shown in Figure 12. One section (north) is the older section from the

original Augustan construction. The other (south) section was constructed during a rehabilitation

of the aqueduct in 323 A.D., during the reign of the emperor Constantine. According to Mr.

Sorrentino, the rehabilitation included approximately 15 kilometers (9 miles) of the original

Serino Aqueduct in this area.

Tirone

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 20 June 2011

Figure 12. Serino Aqueduct (Looking Westerly) at Tirone Showing the South Channel (323 A.D.) on the Left and North (Old) Channel on the Right.

Next, the aqueduct was constructed with a gabled roof, which was typical of the aqueduct

sections in this region. The aqueduct width of the south section was measured at 82 cm (32

inches) wide, with no scaling, and 258 cm (101 inches) from the bottom to the apex of the gable.

The north aqueduct section had a width of 71 cm (28 inches) and a total height of 220 cm (87

inches). The south aqueduct and dimensions are shown in Figure 13.

Another aspect of the aqueduct sections at Tirone is that the calcium carbonate scaling on the

aqueduct walls are quite different when comparing the two sections. The older, north section has

very little scaling. The Constantine (south) section shows more water use with a buildup of scale

of 13 to 15 cm (5 to 6 inches) thick on each wall of the aqueduct channel. In addition, the

thickness of scaling varies with the depth of the channel with the maximum thickness at the mid-

depth of the channel. From mid-depth, the thickness tapers both higher and lower than mid-

depth. This indicates that the depth (and flow) of water in the channel varied considerably

during the operation of the aqueduct. This may have been due to the seasonal variation of flow

from the springs.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 21 June 2011

Figure 13. Southern Aqueduct Dimensions. Built by Constantine in 323 A.D.

We have calculated the slope of an aqueduct that would stretch from the Tirone area to the

Castellum at S = 0.0005.

3.2.2 Muro d’Arce

Located approximately 3.4 kilometers (2 miles) southeast of the Tirone site is Muro d’Arce (wall

of Arce). The site is so named because the aqueduct was located on top of a long wall located on

a former farm called d’Arce. The Muro d’Arce follows the topography along a steep hillside and

a portion is supported by a retaining wall engineered by the Romans.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 22 June 2011

The aqueduct at this location carried the Serino with flow occurring from southeast to northwest.

We were able to visit only the northwest section of this site, in an olive grove, since we received

permission from only this property owner. The Muro d’Arce has suffered significant

degradation due to natural forces on a slope, farming activities, and development.

A major aspect of this location was the Roman engineering use of a unique semi-circular (in

plan) design for foundation support of the aqueduct on a steep hill. We measured the radius of

the circular portions of the structure at one meter (3.3 feet) and the supporting buttresses between

the semi-circular portions at 1.1 meters (3.6 feet) thick.

3.2.3 Acquaro-Pelosi and Urciuoli Springs

Visiting the source water location of the Serino Aqueduct was a major objective of our research

site visit. Mr. Paolo Iandolo, ARIN, was a gracious host at the site and provided us much

information.

The source of water to the ancient Roman Serino aqueduct was in the southern Apennine

Mountains near the modern town of Serino, Italy. The Acquaro and Pelosi Springs are located at

an elevation of 375 meters (1230 feet) when compared to the elevation of the Castellum Aquae at

44 meters (145 feet). This is a drop of 341 meters (985 feet) over a projected ancient aqueduct

length of 60 kilometers (37 miles). This calculates to an average slope of 0.0057.

The springs are still very productive and originate from the Terminio Karst Aquifer of the

Apennine’s. The springs are a major potable water supply for the modern City of Naples. Water

is transported to Naples through a 2 meter (6.6 feet) diameter pipeline for a length of 72

kilometers (43 miles).

At the time of our visit, the Acquaro-Pelosi springs were producing about 500 to 600 liters per

second (18 to 21 cubic feet per second) and can produce 1,000 liters per second (35 cfs) in the

winter rainy season. The springs are, in fact, two long horizontal infiltration galleries (700

meters and 800 meters, respectively) that are constructed at a depth of about 30 meters. The

infiltration galleries flow into a round spring house (9 meters in diameter), see Figure 14. One of

the highlights of our visit was that we were able to visit the interior of the spring house (which is

not common because of security reasons). The visit was arranged by Mr. Illiano.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 23 June 2011

Figure 14. Acquaro-Pelosi Springs – Round Spring House Showing Water Cascading From Infiltration

Galleries to Clearwell.

The water quality of the springs was provided to us by Mr. Iandolo and is presented in Table 1

along with water quality of spring water from Southern France near Barbegal. The quality of the

Acquaro-Pelosi shows slightly hard water with a calcium carbonate scaling potential. This

explains the calcium carbonate depositions that are evident on the walls of the ancient Serino

Aqueduct.

Table 1 Water Quality of the Acquaro-Pelosi Springs Compared to Barbegal Springs

Parameter Southern France – Barbegal Acquaro-Pelosi Springs, Italy

Hardness (mg/L) 310 214

Calcium (mg/L) 110 64

Magnesium (mg/L) 9.5 13

Sodium (mg/L) 10 7

Chloride (mg/L) 10 9

Sulfate (mg/L) 38 9

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 24 June 2011

When the Acquaro-Pelosi Springs were developed for the modern Naples water supply, a Roman

marble epigraph was discovered and is on display in the spring house. The epigraph explains the

restoration of the Serino Aqueduct under the Emperor Constantine and lists the towns that the

aqueduct served. The date on the epigraph is 323 A.D. Of course, the list of towns served does

not include Pompeii, since it was buried under the volcanic material of the Mt. Vesuvius eruption

in 79 A.D.

The Urciuoli Springs are separate and located approximately 5 kilometers from the Acquaro-

Pelosi Springs. These springs were more productive at 1,380 liters per second (49 cfs) during

our visit. These springs may not have been used in the Serino Aqueduct and were known to be a

source of water to the ancient City of Benevento with an aqueduct that followed the path of the

nearby Sabato River. This separate ancient Roman aqueduct was called the Sannitico Aqueduct.

A section of the Sannitico Aqueduct survives, located near the Urciuoli Springs. The section is

similar to the Serino section with a gabled top. We took measurements of the Sannitico

Aqueduct section: 61 centimeters (24 inches) wide and 168 centimeters (66 inches) to the top of

the section.

3.2.4 Avella Springs and the Roman Aqueduct Bridge

The Avella Springs were a source of water for the Roman inhabitants in the area. Whether or not

the Avella Springs supplied water to Pompeii is a question that we seek to investigate in our

future studies.

The springs are located in a valley to the northeast of the modern Town of Avella in the

Apennine Mountains. There are many small springs in this valley and we visited four of them

with the Town Public Works staff. The range of flow rates at each of these springs at the time of

our visit ranged from 5 to 45 liters per second (0.2 to 1.6 cfs). All of these springs are being used

as a water supply for the Town of Avella.

The remote spring we visited was the Sambuco Spring. A spring house was constructed over the

spring with water coming from a hillside cave.

Several years ago, a Roman aqueduct vestige was discovered during the construction of a

modern pipeline near the Bontino 6 Spring. It appears that the aqueduct carried the spring water

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 25 June 2011

down the valley and, according to the Town staff; the remnants of four water powered mills have

been identified. We visited three of the four sites with initial observations that were inconclusive

as to whether these were mill sites.

The Roman aqueduct bringing the water out of the valley included a bridge to carry the water

over the Clanio River. We visited the bridge and it is a superb single arch bridge with a span of

8.6 meters (28 feet) and is fully intact, see Figure 15. We measured the width of the channel

over the bridge at 60 centimeters (24 inches).

Figure 15. Roman Aqueduct Bridge at Avella.

3.2.5 Roccarainaolla Qanats

During our visit with the Avella Public Works staff, they suggested that we visit an ancient

tunneled site in the area of Roccarainaolla, west of Avella. As we learned from Prof. De Feo,

these were qanats that may have been constructed prior to the Roman colonization of the area.

We inspected a tunnel section that was not familiar to us as a typical Roman aqueduct. The

tunnel was dug through the existing geologic strata with no trace of mortar or stones or rubble or

hydraulic concrete. However, there were vertical air shafts that were constructed from stone and

mortar. We visited seven of these shafts over a distance of several hundred meters. The shafts

were circular in section with a diameter of 49 centimeters (19 inches).

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 26 June 2011

3.3 Rome Region

We visited Rome for two days and photographed some of the iconic aqueduct sites in and around

the city. One of our goals was to visit the ancient spring water sources in the Anio River Valley.

3.3.1 Traiana Aqueduct at the American Academy in Rome

The Aqua Traiana was an aqueduct built in the 1st Century by the Emperor Trajan and

inaugurated on 24 June 109 AD. During our visit with Dr. Cory Brennan and fellow John

Matteo, we were invited to inspect a section of the aqueduct that has been preserved under the c.

1913 villa at the American Academy in Rome (Academy). We entered the aqueduct section by a

hatchway built into the floor of the cryptoporticus. The Traiana section had dimensions of 181

centimeters (71 inches) from floor to apex and 98 cm (39 inches) wide, see Figure 16.

Because of Meisha Hunter’s past study at the Academy, we were able to spend some time in the

library to do some research. Here, we obtained copies of several papers addressing Pompeii

hydraulics.

Figure 16. Inside the Triania Aqueduct underneath the American Academy of Rome.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 27 June 2011

3.3.2 Source Springs and Aqueduct Section – Aqua Claudia and Marcia

The water sources for the great Aqua Claudia and the Marcia (also the Aqua Anio Novus) are

located in the Anio River Valley approximately 50 kilometers (31 miles) east (straight line) of

ancient Rome. The Aqua Claudia was about 69 kilometers (43 miles) long along the aqueduct

route. This compares to the Serino Aqueduct at 96 kilometers (about 60 miles).

The geology in the Anio River Valley is similar to the geology of the more southern section of

the Apennine Mountains at the Acquaro-Pelosi Springs that served the Serino Aqueduct at

Pompeii. The spring sources for the Claudia and Marcia are from the Simbruini Mountains,

which are in the central section of the Apennines. The limestone and karst landscape, with the

fissures and caves that provide storage for the rainfall on the mountains, is also similar to the

geology in the Alpilles Mountains that served as the water source supply at Barbegal in Southern

France.

We went as far as Nero’s Villa, where the Roman Emperor constructed dams on the Anio River,

which later became the source of the Anio Novus. We visited modern day springs (Marano

Equo) where the local people come and fill jars for their home supply.

The springs in the Anio Valley are currently used to supply potable water to Rome. We stopped

at a maintenance facility for the springs and talked with a man with the Azienda Comunale

Energia e Ambiente (ACEA) who informed us that the current capacity of the springs that

delivered water to Rome was at 5,000 liters per second (176 cfs).

We also made a stop at the San Cosimato Tunnel where the Claudia Aqueduct crossed the Anio

River (the location is Map 14, Aicher 1995). We were able to measure the aqueduct width at 98

centimeters.

3.3.3 Source Springs – Virgo

Meisha Hunter studied the 21 km long, gravity fed, Virgo Aqueduct during her fellowship year

at the Academy. Thus, we had a personal tour of the source springs and detailed history of the

Virgo during our visit.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 28 June 2011

The Virgo was dedicated in 19 B.C. after both the Aqua Claudia and the Marcia; however, the

source spring water at the Sorgente di Salone was much closer to the city, see Figure 17.

Figure 17. Current Day Water Tower at the Site of the Groundwater Spring Used for the Ancient Virgo

Aqueduct that Served Rome.

4.0 FUTURE STUDY AND ACTION PLAN

The research and data obtained during this field visit will be developed with the goal of

authoring papers and articles for submittal to civil engineering and water history journals and

magazines. Currently, the following subjects are planned for papers:

1. The Hydraulics of Water Supply to the House of the Hanging Balcony.

2. Groundwater Well Supply at Pompeii.

3. Ancient Roman Water Supplies from Karstic Landscapes: Similarities from Pompeii,

Rome, and Gaul (Southern France).

Additional field work is needed in the Pompeii region. One priority of study is for research and

investigation of site archeological remains to confirm the route of the Avella and Serino

Aqueducts, as shown in Figure 18.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 29 June 2011

Figure 18. Route of Avella and Serino (Augustus) Aqueducts.

Within the City of Pompeii, work remains to inventory and measure the public fountains, wells, and water towers. In addition, the use

of wells and mechanisms for pumping water to the Pompeii public baths is an area of desired research.

Report of Field Investigations – Pompeii, Italy (and Rome) October 2010

991-999.1121 Wright Paleohydrological Institute, Inc. Page 30 June 2011

5.0 REFERENCES

Aicher, Peter J. 1995. Guide to the Aqueducts of Ancient Rome. Bolchazy – Carducci Publishers,

Wauconda, Illinois.

Berry, Joann. 2007. The Complete Pompeii. Thames and Hudson Publishing, New York.

Jansen, 2001. Water Pipe Systems in the Houses of Pompeii in A.O. Koloski-Ostrow (ed.) Water Use and Hydraulics in the Roman City. Dubuque, I.A. Kendall Hunt: 27-40.

Ohlig, Christoph P.J. 2001. De aquis Pompeiorum. Das Castellum Aquae in Pompeji: Herkunft, Zuleitung und Verteilung des Wassers. Circumvesuviana, Volume 4. Nijmegen: Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt.

Z:\Project Files\GO\991-999\991-999.1121\Deliverables\Trip Report - 2010\Pompeii Trip Report June.doc

APPENDIX A Authorization Letters Dated

September 19, 2010 and October 25, 2010

10 /0 9 2010 1 2' 41 FAI 0818575310 SOPRINTENDE'V. PO~lPEI

Prot. n. Risposra a IIDTlI n. /Ii! Ns. Prol. N. 29896 Class.l8.I 3.07

ft -;Ministero per i lJJeni e re j( ttività Culturali Soprinterufenza Speciak peri rBeni)ln;lieoCogici

tfì :Napoli e <Pompei

SERVIZIO I . S'lf'tmo Sdottifiro

Ali. n. dci 28.08.2010 del 31.08.]010

Int.

MBAC-SSBA·NA PROTARCPOM

003112310/09/2010 CI. 28. I 3.07/5

---l> AI Dr. Wayue F. Lorem: Wright WaIrc EngineeI>, Jru: DENVERICO Fu 303 - 480 1020

E, p.C. AlI. Società AretIrusa BigIktteria Scavi

All'Ufficio Scavi di Pompei

OGGETTO: Scavi di Pompei. Aworizzazione visita e misurazioni, oon ingresso gratuito. Periodo: oMbre 2010,

~OO l

A riscontro deU.e-mail deI28agosto2010enell .ambitodellostudiosull .usodell .3ajll3aIIticaegestionedelleac<[ue.si autorizzano il dott. Wa)''''' F, Lon:az, direttore dell ' Istituto Romano di Ingegneria Idraulica pre'so il PaIeobydrological Wrigt di De:nver (Colorado) e cinque collaborJItori, ad accedere gralllitamell1e agIJ Scavi di Pompei, per osservare le caratteristiche dell'acqua alI'ink;mo della città antica, individuare i resti dell' acquedotto Serino all' estemo della città e prendere mi!.ure GPS.

Si prega prendere preventivi contatti oon l 'Ufficio Scavi di Pompei (0039 081 8575403-4(0) per definire le modalilà deUe visite da effettuare.

rr

SEP 10 201 0 03'51

IL lOPJ>~ENfE PF 'Gilijf Proietti

Pi.:u:zaM_ 19 - 80135 - Nopoli. Id Pb~ +39081-44l2111- FIl"; +3;081440013 Vi, villb driMid.mi, 2 - 80045 Pompo:" CNA) - Tal. -Pbx .39081,51S1 \ l; F iIX +35081861318'3

Cod.!c..c; fiIW., 9} 102.1606)4 a'?+n.i@hgnjcu! luraljìr, hp,p 'i/Wl!J" camp:jIljabçnje!JNtoli jl; WP"j/yr1rryt pq""""";il'l.!l),gr;

0818575310 P;1GE .01

25 / 10 2010 14 :09 FAX 0818575 310 SOPRINTENDE,ZA POMPEI ~001

DA : C01'JM ISSAR ID DELEGQTO PDr1PE I N.FAX :0216575234 12 GEN. 201023: 32 P1

l'mi. n. RUpoSla D norD n, Rif. /1, •• Pro, N. 35682 CI=.28.11.07

9rii1Ustero per i (JJmi e re JI ttività Quftw-a/i Scprinterufen.za Speciak peri lBen(71,,.dico(ogiçi

di !Napofi e !Pompei

SERV1Z10 I - S~",,(,riu Sdottifica

All. II . d,I 14.10.20/0 del 19.10.2010 l.,

Pompei

AIWP!

MBAC·SSBA·NA ?ROTARCPOM

0036410 25/10/20- O CI. 26.13.07/5

WI'igh! Pakohydrologica1lnstitut c.a. Prof. Wayoe F. Lo,..". Derrver - Colorodo Fm: 001303 480 1020

E, p.c. AlJ. Società Arothusa Biglù:ttJ:,ria Scavi

AlJ 'UfIielo Sc2vi di Pompei

OGGETTO: Scavi di Pompei. Aut<>ri1zazione visita e ingII'aso grntuito. Poriodo: 2~ -29 oItob ... 2tJIO.

A risconlTO dell'i&1anz:l del 14 otUlbre 2010 • nell'lIt11blto di un viaggio di studio, si 'otoriz2J!no i riccn;atori Wayoo Lorcl\2, Gai] Loronz, MoishA H\lJ\lOr • Erik Baros ad accedere flIlIrui1lUru:111t: agli Scavi Pompei ocl periodo indkalo in ogg.:rto, P'" visimre ed dn:ttuare riJIIl"< fotografiche degli impianti idrici dci seguenti "",ghi.

C!\SA dol BoI"",," Pensile e fontano vane.

Siamo sp1acerrti di comunicare che, a causa di !a\'ori in cor.;o. non è possibile autori.zz:m! la vi&im allo Terme Stabiant.

Si prc:ga ptt:ndrn: p'avontivi contatti con l'Ufficio Scavi di Pompei (<cl . 081 &575403.4(0), por definire le modalità dc113 vi9ira da etJ'ettuare,

lJf

OCT 25 2013 05 : 19

lL~~~NTE Je~r~ulc5

Pì ... z:u M\IK'O. l'' - 8013' - N, poIl- Tol Pblt +)~ll ""2~ 1' 1_ l-' 1llI +::;901 146L111 13 v,ovUlo dei M!lMD. Z -B~ l'ompcl(NA)' Tol. -J'tr.!!; +31108115"1 11; FILI: +J~la6UU)

ç,ç,dio:' J'j,,~~1c: 95HT.!7C:06,Jo ""t;.Q..r41rc:t1!Q\I!{uu.h,l!. taw~ b:tP~npm:yi"jk'W

0618575310 P~GE. 0 1