population viability analyses (pva) presentation 1 lesson 7

27
Population Viability Analyses (PVA) Presentation 1 Lesson 7

Upload: emmeline-eaton

Post on 26-Dec-2015

239 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Population Viability Analyses (PVA)

Presentation 1

Lesson 7

PVA

Most PVA’s consider internal factors (sex ratio, number of births, survival, etc) and the effect of these internal factors on population persistence

We will study the effect of external factors (habitat, disturbances) in a later class.

Ideas of population persistence

Human the hunter realized that habitat type is important for distribution and abundance of prey

Humans also understood that habitat quality is important

With the advent of agriculture and animal husbandry humans realized that sex ratios, age of individuals, and morphological characteristics were important for reproduction.

Ideas of population persistence (cont.)

Island biogeography showed us habitat quantity is fundamental to survival of a population (even with the best habitat without enough of it population would not survive)

In the 1990s we realized that habitat pattern important (metapopulation theory)

Not only must we have enough good habitat it must be arranged in an appropriate pattern

E.g.: northern spotted owl in NW US and Canada

Review of metapopulation theory

Source and sink dynamics Source = surplus individuals produced migrate

to areas available for them to live Sources have demographics that lead to

population increase Source has habitat suitable for population

increase Sink = space available for migrants

Source and sink dynamics

Studies show that small % of total population may be located in source habitat

As little as10 % of population could be source* Provided new definition for key (or critical)

habitat Key habitat= defined by habitat specific

reproductive success and survivorship not just population density

*Pulliam, H.R. 1988. Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132:652-661

Northern Spotted Owl

Ccourtesy of Eric Forsman, U.S. Forest Service

NW US and B.C.

Non-migratory

Natural low population

Dense timber (old growth)

Thomas et al (1990) used PVA to devise conservation strategy

Purpose of Population Viability Analyses (PVA)

To study how habitat loss, environmental uncertainty, demographic stocasticity, and genetic factors determine extinction probabilities for individual species

Metapopulation theory provides us with the basis to understand these relationships

PVA can be used to tell us how large a population is required for the group to survive for a know period of time, e.g. 95% probability of extinction in 100 yrs.

Application of PVA

We can use PVA to model the probability of a population failing or prospering under a given set of circumstances

Can be used to set size of population required to restore SAR or maintain species of interest.

Can use to find features that make a population vulnerable

Application of PVA

This will provide us answers to management questions:– Where should we concentrate our efforts?– Increasing births?– Reducing deaths of young?– Reducing deaths of old?– Reducing deaths of males?– Reducing deaths of females?

Vulnerability

Small populations are vulnerable because of chance events

Chance operates at several levels:– When organisms die– How many off spring they have– If they find mates– Effects of weather on food, shelter– Effects on genetic makeup of population– Catastrophes

Demographic stocasticity

Environmental stocasticity

Genetic stocasticity

Chance and populations

As general rule:– Genetic and demographic uncertainty important for

viability of small populations (50 - 250 breeding individuals)

– Environmental uncertainty important for populations in the order of 1,000 to 10,000 individuals

– Natural catastrophes important for all population sizes

Vulnerability

Chance events become more important as population becomes smaller

Chance events can reinforce the negative effects of one another

Minimum viable population (MVP)

The smallest isolated population having a 99% chance of surviving 100 years.– Can change % and years depending on objectives– Once we have a MVP can multiply it by the home

range figures to calculate minimum area needed to support MVP

History of PVA

First used by Shaffer (1983) to study grizzly bear in Yellowstone National Park

Used detailed 12 yr data on grizzly population to construct population dynamics by tracking individual bears and incorporating effects of chance events

NPS Photo

Grizzly bears

If you wanted a 95% chance for grizzly bears to survive for 100 years you have to have enough habitat to allow 70-90 bears

If you want a 99% chance or longer time of survival then more bears needed

Study did not model genetic influences or chance natural catastrophes

NPS Photo

History of PVA

Today over 30 PVA studies Theoretical basis for population viability still

developing Do not have models sophisticated enough Do not have life history description and data for

most organisms

Limits of PVA

Only as reliable as inputs! Depends on realism of model’s logic! Need lots of demographic data (not usually

available) Long term projections imply habitat stability

and all else being equal (often not the case in the real world)

Best bets for future

Cannot do PVA for all SAR Identify spp indicative of natural system

(indicator spp or keystone spp) PVA for these will provide area requirements

for others that require the same system These indicators are likely to be top carnivores:

long-lived, slow reproduction, large body

Best bets for conservation

Create multiple populations: single catastrophe cannot destroy spp

Increase size of each population so that genetic, demographic and environmental factors less threatening (very difficult to do)

PVA in harvest regulation

Elements of PVA is used to determine minimum population before harvest is sustainable.

Need information on population dynamics, life history, demographics to determine sustainable harvest levels.

PVA and large populations

Passenger Pigeon(Ectopistes migratorius)

Photo: Cornell U

Photo: NPS

Photo: NPS

Photo: NPS

What can PVA tell us about the sudden demise of large populations?

PVA and large populations

Populations do not exhibit constant population declines

# of

Individuals in population

Time

A

B

PVA and large populations

Under some circumstances populations will exhibit threshold responses = dramatic population changes over short time period

See Lande (1987) for hypothetical responses Thresholds are difficult to predict

PVA and large populations

% landscape agricultural

% suitable habitat occupied

Assume

1) Bird population, juveniles migrate, if suitable habitat found they survive

2) Habitat near agric land less suitable, less food, pesticides

3) Low reproduction near agric land

4) When % agric land increases, reprod lower

5) When reprod = mortality, suitable habitat occupied declines rapidly

Threshold

Modelling populations

A simple population model

Nt+1= Nt + B - M

Nt+1 = Population tomorrow

Nt = Population today

B = Births

M = Mortality

Can put in one average value and come up with one result:

Try these values in the formula:Nt =100B=50M=30What is Nt+1?

Ans: 120

Questions?