porter and stern (2002) asserted that firms operating in advanced nations whose economies are...
TRANSCRIPT
Porter and Stern (2002) asserted that firms operating in advanced nations whose economies are innovation-based would not obtain a sustained competitive advantage if they were not able to “create and then commercialize new products and processes and shift the technology frontier as fast as their rivals can catch up” (p. 2).
Does Organizational Training Help Firms Operating and Competing in the Innovation-Based Economy
Innovate? A Survey of Training Professionals
by
Vichet Sum, Ph.D.[Assistant Professor of Management, University of Maryland – Eastern Shore]
www.vichetsum.com
Global Digital Business Association2010 Annual Conference
Abstract
Outline
Problem Statement & Purpose of the Present Study
Research Methods
Research Results
Conclusion & Recommendation for Practice
Questions & Answers
Training Innovation (Measures of Innovation)
Abstract
Relationship: Strategic Integration of Training & Innovation
Findings: Training Contributes to Measures of Innovation
Findings: Statistically Significant Relationship
rs (97) = .566, p < .01
Problem: Training is Strategically Important?
Problem Statement & Purpose
To Contribute to a Greater Understanding of the Impact of Training on the Firm’s Innovation
Question 1: To what extent does organizational training contribute to the firm’s innovation as perceived by training professionals?
Question 2: How do training professionals determine the extent to which organizational training contributes to the firm’s innovation?
Question 3: Is there a relationship between the training professionals’ perceived involvement in the integration of training in their firms’ business strategies and the extent to which organizational training contributes to their firms’ innovation?
Design: Non-Experimental Using Online Survey
Research Methods
Population (N): 6450 Training Professionals
Required Sample Size (n): 376 (n = 6450 / [1 + 6450*(0.05)²] = 376)
Number of Invitations Sent: 450 (One follow-up)
Response Rate: 107 or (107/450)*100 = 23.77%
Instrument Validity : Literature Review & Panel of Experts
Instrument Reliability: Cronbach's α (alpha)
Gender: Male (48) & Female (63)
Research Results: Participants
Age Groups: 21-30 (9); 31-40 (25); 41-50 (34); 51-60 (30); 61-70 (9)
Location of Participants: 20 different US States
Job Title: Training Manager: 28 (25.2%) Training Consultant:19 (17.1%) Training Director: 17 (15.3%) Training Specialist: 16 (14.4%) Trainer:12 (10.8) HR Manager: 8 (7.2%) Instructional Design Manager: 5 (4.5%)
Job Tenure: 1 – 5 Years (62); More than 5 Years (45)
Education: Bachelor (37); Master’s (56); Doctorate (13)
Industry: Service(74); Manufacturing(25); Retailing (10)
Research Results: Participants’ Firms
Size: Small (100 or Less Employees): 26 Medium (101-1000 Employees): 20 Large (1001 or More Employees): 61
Engagement in Global Operations: YES (58); NO (51)
Question 1: To what extent does organizational training contribute to the firm’s innovation as perceived by training professionals?
Research Results: Question 1
Improvement of New Product/Service Design: 2.66 Effective Introduction of New Products/Services to the Market: 2.87 Effective Introduction of New Business Processes: 3.30 Improvement of Current Products/Services: 3.45 Improvement of Current Business Processes: 3.34
n = 107; alpha = .876
5 (Very High) 4 (High)3 (Moderate)2 (Low)1 (Very Low) 0 N/A
Research Results: Question 2
Question 2: How do training professionals determine the extent to which organizational training contributes to the firm’s innovation?
Training Evaluation (3rd) Executive Report (4th) Communication with colleagues and management team (1st) Observation (2nd) Meeting (5th) Other
Research Results: Question 3
Differentiation Strategy: 3.59 (92) Cost Leadership Strategy: 3.24 (84) Focus Strategy: 3.53 (79) Market Penetration Strategy: 3.45 (71) Product/Service Development Strategy: 3.46 (79) Market Development Strategy: 3.25 (68) Diversification Strategy: 2.86 (73)
Alpha: .930
Question 3: Is there a relationship between the training professionals’ perceived involvement in the integration of training in their firms’ business strategies and the extent to which organizational training contributes to their firms’ innovation?
5 (Very High) 4 (High)3 (Moderate)2 (Low)1 (Very Low) 0 N/A
Research Results: Question 3 (Cont’d)
Question 3: Is there a relationship between the training professionals’ perceived involvement in the integration of training in their firms’ business strategies and the extent to which organizational training contributes to their firms’ innovation?
Research Results: Question 3 (Cont’d)
Question 3: Is there a relationship between the training professionals’ perceived involvement in the integration of training in their firms’ business strategies and the extent to which organizational training contributes to their firms’ innovation?
Training Innovation (Measures of Innovation)
Conclusion & Recommendation for Practice
Relationship: Strategic Integration of Training & Innovation
Findings: Training Contributes to Measures of Innovation
Findings: Statistically Significant Relationship
rs (97) = .566, p < .01
Top Management: Needs to Genuinely Recognize Strategic Importance of training
Top Management: Needs to Integrate Training in Every Business Strategy
Training Professionals: Rely More on Objective and Scientific Methods in Evaluating the Impact of Training on the Firm’s Bottom Lines