positive accounting
DESCRIPTION
Positive Accounting TheoryTRANSCRIPT
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-1
Chapter 8
Economic Consequences and
Positive Accounting Theory
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-2
Positive Accounting Theory (PAT)
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-3
What is PAT?• Studies Managers’ Accounting
Policy Choices, As Part of the Overall Process of Corporate Governance
• That Is, Accounting Policies are Chosen Strategically
• Positive, Not Normative. Tries to Understand and Predict Managers’ Accounting Policy Choices.
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-4
ASSUMPTIONS OF PAT• Managers are Rational (Like
Investors) Conflict (Between Interests of Managers and Investors)
• Efficient Securities Market• Efficient Managerial Labour Market
– But may be inside information about manager effort and ability (moral hazard problem)
– A second major role for financial reporting--to report on manager effort and ability
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-5
The 3 Hypotheses of PAT
• Bonus Plan Hypothesis– Derives from managerial incentive
contracts• Debt Covenant Hypothesis
– Derives from debt contracts• Political Cost Hypothesis
– Very large firms minimize political “heat”
• NB: Contacts are Rigid
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-6
Managing Reported Earnings
• Ways to Do It– Changing accounting policies– Managing discretionary accruals– Timing of adoption of new accounting
standards– Changing real variables--R&D,
advertising, repairs & maintenance– SPEs (Enron), capitalize operating
expenses (WorldCom)–
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-7
Managing Reported Earnings Through
Discretionary Accruals• NI = OCF ± Net Accruals
= OCF ± Net Non-Discretionary Accruals ± Net Discretionary Accruals
• Examples of Discretionary Accruals– Allowance for doubtful accounts– Provision for reorganization
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-8
Estimating Discretionary Accruals
• Use Total Accruals as Proxy– Healy (1985)
• Examine Specific Accounts– Accounts receivable &
allowance•McNichols & Wilson (1988)
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-9
2 Versions of PAT• Opportunistic Version
– Managers choose accounting policies for their own benefit
• Efficient Contracting Version– Managers choose accounting
policies to attain corporate governance objectives of the firm
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
8-10
Distinguishing Opportunistic v.
Efficiency Versions of PAT, Concl.
• Conclude: Significant Evidence in Favour of Efficiency Version of PAT
• This Implies that the Inherent Conflict Between Investor and Manager Interests is Reasonably Controlled– How this is done is subject of Chapter
9